Skip to content

Archive for

30
Dec

Twitter slammed for hiring Apple’s (white) head of diversity


Twitter is one of the Silicon Valley companies most criticized for a lack of diversity, and its latest hire isn’t helping that image. The company recently announced that Jeffrey Siminoff will replace Janet Van Huysse as vice president of diversity and inclusion. Siminoff, who is white and male, was previously Apple’s head of diversity and is a strong promoter of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender rights. However, the move was criticized by diversity proponents like Mark S. Luckie, who didn’t take issue with Siminoff himself, but rather the decision. “Not saying a white guy can’t be head of diversity, but for a company that hires a majority white guys [sic] it sends the wrong message,” he tweeted.

Twitter publicly promised to increase the number of women and under-represented minorities in 2015 after seeing declining numbers the year before. However, in a recent Medium post, the company’s formerly highest-ranking black employee, Leslie Miley, said that Twitter’s diversity problem won’t be easy to fix. “There was very little diversity in thought and almost no diversity in action.” He said that includes an “over-reliance on a limited number of schools and workplaces for talent, [which] has caused a type of group-think to dominate.”

Civil rights leader Jesse Jackson pointed out that “Blacks and Latinos over-index on using Twitter, but their board of directors and C-suite leadership remain all white,” according to USA Today. Recent statistics show that 30 percent of Twitter users, but only six percent of Twitter employees are black or Hispanic. That also brought up another criticism — Siminoff, like most Twitter execs, isn’t exactly a prolific user, with only 800-plus tweets in five years. In fact, the only senior Twitter employee who tweets very much is CEO Jack Dorsey. And critics like Erica Joy think that Siminoff’s tenure as diversity chief will be doomed unless Dorsey himself becomes extremely hands-on with the issue. “Nobody but the CEO is going to be able to fix [diversity problems],” she said in a Medium post.

Via: USA Today

Source: Twitter (Twitter)

30
Dec

The prose at the end of the universe


For over a decade, Canadian poet Dr. Christian Bök has toiled to create living prose. Bök calls the project The Xenotext and, should he be successful in his attempts, he will have done something truly special. The idea, at its core? To encipher poetry within an immortal bacterium’s genome. Poetry that will last forever.

“A big concern is the protection of valuable information in the case of a nuclear catastrophe,” Pak Chung Wong told the New Scientist in 2003. Wong, then an information technologist at the Pacific Northwestern Laboratory, had just enciphered some lyrics from “It’s a Small World” into the genome of Deinococcus radiodurans, a bacterium that can survive in extreme conditions. Wong theorized that the DNA of bacteria, and perhaps even hardy organisms like cockroaches and types of weed, could be used to preserve our data for future generations.

Wong’s work made waves, but the full concept for The Xenotext didn’t come until later. Shortly after the paper was published, astrophysicist Paul Davies mused that SETI’s efforts to discover extraterrestrial intelligence through radio waves might be misguided. Davies posited that, due to the vastness of space, the most astute way to communicate across interstellar distances would be to build self-replicating and -maintaining robots that could slowly explore the universe.

The idea wasn’t particularly novel, but Davies’ interpretation of it was: He said there were already such “robots” on our planet. Viruses and bacteria, he suggested, were capable of replicating and repairing themselves using resources in close vicinity. What if an alien had, in fact, programmed information into a hardy bacterium and sent it across the universe? What if sitting on our planet, neatly gift-wrapped in a bacterial casing, was a message from the stars, waiting for a lifeform of sufficient intelligence to recognize and decode it? Bök was enthralled by the possibility. “I thought both of these speculations were extremely extravagant, but yet, the technology that would be involved in this endeavor works,” he told me.

What if sitting on our planet, waiting to be decoded, was a message from across the universe?

Current research suggests that Earth was in the first eight percent of habitable planets to form. We may be one of the first civilizations to leave our atmosphere in search of the unknown. If Davies’ hypothesis is possible, humans could be the first civilization to put it in motion. But what might that communication look like? NASA’s Voyager probe famously included a Golden Record — a message in a bottle with a map to our planet and an audio snapshot of our world. If and when it’s discovered by intelligent lifeforms, our world may be long gone. But they will know that we once existed.

https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https3A//api.soundcloud.com/playlists/129030648&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true

A single bacterium can store vastly less information than NASA’s Golden Record. If we as a species can leave a single message behind, what text should we choose to represent our world? “Surely poetry should be at the core of such an experience, such a technological advancement,” Bök said. And so The Xenotext was born.

Bök

Christian Bök is not a typical poet. His work is beautiful, of that there can be no doubt, but it’s perhaps better described as fastidious, or even self-flagellatory. He calls his first major work, Crystallography, “a pataphysical encyclopedia about the metaphor of crystals as a conceit for poetry.” Bök was fascinated with crystals as a lyric poet, leaning on them for imagery and metaphors, and the book is both a thorough study of that fascination and beautiful collection of poetry in its own right.

After Crystallography came Euonia, and a mainstream success rarely seen in the poetry world. Named for the shortest word in English to contain all five vowels, Euonia comprises five chapters, each containing only one vowel. The work took seven years to complete. On release in 2001, it became the first book of poetry to appear on the Canadian Globe and Mail best sellers list, and was awarded the Griffin Poetry Prize the following year. It also saw international success, breaching the UK charts upon its release. Any poetry book reaching such heights would have been special; such an experimental work doing so was unprecedented. “It made my reputation as a poet,” Bök admits.

“Writing is inhibiting. Sighing, I sit, scribbling in ink this pidgin script. I sing with nihilistic witticism, disciplining signs with trifling gimmicks — impish hijinks which highlight stick sigils. Isn’t it glib? Isn’t it chic? I fit childish insights within rigid limits, writing schtick which might instill priggish misgivings in critics blind with hindsight. I dismiss nitpicking criticism which flirts with philistinism. I bitch; I kibitz – griping whilst criticizing dimwits, sniping whilst indicting nitwits, dismissing simplistic thinking, in which philippic wit is still illicit.”

An excerpt from ‘Euonia.’

“These two books are, I guess, interested in ‘beautiful thinking,’ in the form of perfection, in careful thought. Structurally rigorous in its presentation, and beautifully rendered in its speech, cadences and musicality.” Bök speaks like this; every phrase has a rhythm, each sentence is a potential stanza. He has an air of supreme confidence, a swagger that could easily be mistaken for arrogance. And conviction is important when you’re trying to create undying poetry.

The Xenotext

The Xenotext is an extreme endeavor. It seems so simple at first, but each element relies on another, opening a rabbit hole of complexity. It starts with a couplet, two lines of poetry entwined and meant to be read in tandem, written by Bök:

“Any style of life
is prim

The faery is rosy
of glow”

In a literary sense, the lines talk, each reflecting the other in structure, letter length and content. Tonally, the first is “masculine” and assertive, while the second is “feminine” and ephemeral. Bök calls them Orpheus and Eurydice, from the famous Greek tragedy of the man who traveled to the underworld in an attempt to bring his lover back to the land of the living.

Structurally, the letters in the first poem correspond to those in the second — it’s a monoalphabetic substitution cipher. That means “L” is encoded as “R,” “I” is encoded as “O,” and so on. Such ciphers are common, but it’s extremely difficult to create one that allows for functional words on both sides, let alone attractive or meaningful poetry.

Going deeper down the rabbit hole, the poetry corresponds to genetics, with each of the cipher’s letter pairings representing a DNA codon and an amino acid. DNA is represented in science by four letters, the programming units of life: G, A, T and C. A codon is a three-letter string combining any of those letters. For example, in the cipher, “N” equals “H” and a codon (i.e. ATG), while “H” equals “N” and an amino acid. (There are 21 amino acids, which can combine to make every type of protein there is.)

With the first poem enciphered in Gs, As, Ts and Cs, it’s then inserted into the genome of bacteria that can outlive humans. But this isn’t just a random message like “It’s a Small World.” Instead, it sets in motion two things: The bacteria glow red, and they produce protein.

And when deciphered, the protein’s amino acid string reads as the second line of the poem. Oh, and the reason for it glowing red? It’s a “self-reflective fulfillment,” a reference to the poem it’s writing, and its faery’s “rosy glow.”

Christian Bök speaking at The Power Plant in Toronto, Canada.

At this juncture it’s worth taking a moment to consider Bök’s background. He has a doctorate in English language and is an associate professor at the University of Calgary’s creative writing faculty. While certainly an accomplished academic, one thing he cannot be described as is a biochemist.

Bök has a doctorate in English Literature, not Biochemistry

Bök has taught himself everything he needs to know in order to succeed. That includes studying genetics to create the cipher, studying proteomics in order to engineer the protein, and learning computer programming languages in order to run virtual models of his experiments before paying a lab to do them for him.

Despite completing this considerable feat, Bök is fairly blasé about his achievement. “That’s always been my joke: If it’s written in English I should be able to figure out how to understand it. It’s just words. Concepts that I can understand,” he explained. “If I don’t understand the meaning of the word, I look up the meaning of the word. If I don’t understand the meaning of the words in the definition I look them up. It’s honestly, it’s just an exercise in immersion. A way of learning a new set of skills.”

The bacteria

After spending years learning enough to write Orpheus and Eurydice, Bök turned his attention to the prevalent bacteria Escherichia coli (E. coli) as a host for his initial experiments. Best known as the bringer of serious food poisoning, E. coli is cheap and simple to grow in labs, making it a perfect test subject. Actually turning theoretical ideas into physical proof required yet more learning, and more patience. It wasn’t until 2011, almost a decade after the journey began, that the breakthrough happened.

The Xenotext works!“, an excited Bök announced to Poetry Foundation readers. “Yesterday, I received confirmation from the laboratory at the University of Calgary that my poetic cipher, gene X-P13, has in fact caused E. coli to fluoresce red in our test-runs. … My poem does, in fact, cause the bacterium to write, in response, its own poem.” It had taken Bök around a year to write the gene, and it had worked. But this was just an experiment. A precursor to the real test: Deinococcus radiodurans.

The lifeform to be entrusted with Bök’s prose is Deinococcus radiodurans, an extremophilic bacterium. It was first described in the ’50s, when it survived what was then thought to be a life-obliterating dose of radiation. Although that’s its most famous quality — its species name is Latin for “radiation surviving”; its genus translates as “terrible berry” — D. radiodurans has many skills. It’s fine taking an acid bath, for one. It’s also adept at dealing with dehydration, extreme cold, and it can survive in a vacuum. In ideal conditions, it’s biologically immortal.

These are hardy bacteria, for sure. But D. radiodurans’ most spectacular facet is its unique (in current scientific knowledge) ability to repair huge portions of its own DNA. Because its chromosome is repeated many times over, it’s able to recognize if a segment is destroyed, and repair it. Think of its genome like a RAID drive configuration in a server or a computer: a loop of redundancies that’s always watching for errors.

D. radiodurans could still be around after we’re gone, waiting for the sun to explode and consume the world

Because of its qualities, D. radiodurans is the subject of much research — it’s been touted as potentially invaluable for the fight against cancer, the search for immortality and even as a possible link to life on Mars. Regardless of our own abilities to bend it to our will, there is every chance that D. radiodurans will be around after we’re gone, sitting there, waiting for the sun to explode and consume the world. For Bök, it was the perfect host for his latest opus. One that will protect his poetry from the jaws of eternity with every picogram of its being.

The trouble with D. radiodurans

D. radiodurans’ ability to look after itself has proved a problem. After reworking the code for the new bacterium, Bök has run two experiments, both of which have failed. “From a scientific standard, my scientific collaborators believe I’ve succeeded,” he elaborated. But, despite his nascent expertise in the subject, Bök is not a scientist, he’s a poet. And his poem is being destroyed.

There are three things that Bök needs to achieve for his The Xenotext to be a success. First, he has to prove the gene sequence has been integrated into D. radiodurans’ genome. Second, D. radiodurans has to, in response, build the protein and glow red. Finally, he has to read the protein’s genome and decipher it as the Eurydice poem. The first two have been checked off — the final has not. “Every time we look for the protein we only detect part of it,” Bök lamented. “[D. radiodurans is] destroying the protein too quickly for us to be able to read the entire poem.”

Why this is happening is a mystery — if Bök had the answer, he would have devised a solution by now. That’s not to say a solution can’t be found. The protein destruction was “a chronic problem” in his early E. coli experiments, but he managed to solve it. When it came to reworking the experiment for D. radiodurans, he “simply transplanted that construct into the new organism,” but that didn’t work as planned. He is now dedicated to revising the process so that Eurydice will be readable.

Even if Bök “succeeds,” he may not have actually created an undying poem. When questioned, Bök acknowledges the hyperbole: “Short of designing something that benefits the organism or enhances its survivability, there’s probably no way to really guarantee that the poem persists.” So, as stable an organism as we think this is, evolution must still play a factor in some way, even if D. radiodurans is capable of repairing its own DNA and preserving it against mutational drift.

Book 1

After the successful E. coli experiments, Bök began work on his first book since Euonia. Published in October, The Xenotext: Book 1 is at once a collection of apocalyptic poetry and a scientific primer in genetic and proteomic engineering.

“The work I’ve written is tantamount to a poet trying to render the song, the poem, the lyrical effort as immortal. To render a poem deathless, capable of surviving in the face of its own extinction.” A complex and self-referential work, it examines the threat of human extinction juxtaposed against art’s ability to transcend generations.

It’s not coincidence that The Xenotext itself is named for Orpheus and Eurydice, the former so bold that he rode into Hades to rescue his lover, only to turn around and see her disappear. They’re doomed to spend eternity in each other’s hearts, but not arms, just as the bacterium and its protein will spend a lifetime calling one another’s names. “[Book 1] addresses the degree to which we are good stewards of the planet, the degree to which we can ethically preserve our culture heritage against planetary disaster. The degree to which we’ve done a good job of being custodians of life on the Earth.”

The dark themes it deals with could so easily make it inaccessible, but the beauty and precision of the prose is the perfect counterweight. That Bök has also weaved the basic principles of the experiment, and a primer in the sciences, is truly impressive. “The first book is me clearing my throat. It’s kind of a movie trailer for the second book,” he mused. In fact, the entire book is itself a metaphor, an Orphic volume about poetry, the poet, sciences and the experiment. Next will be the Eurydicean book, which will dive into the poetry’s response through a sci-fi horror exploration of the bacteria themselves.

Book 2

It’s when talking of Book 2 that Bök’s confidence in his own abilities begins to waver. He managed to obtain funding for his project, proving that despite his nonscientific background he had the knowledge to see his proposal through. The problem is that funding is finite. “I’ve got just enough money to try again maybe once or twice more,” Bök said. Unfortunately, the lab team he was working with has moved onto new projects, so he’ll have to rebuild that from scratch.

Before he can hope to find a solution, though, Bök needs a hypothesis for why it’s not working. “I still think I can figure it out,” he asserted. “If I do so, then I’ll undoubtedly publish the book to much fanfare.” With well over a decade of work on The Xenotext behind him, it’s clear that Bök never stopped learning. He’s likely studying the obscurities of proteomics as you read this, searching for his answer.

But what if the answer never arrives? “I’m worried that I’ll end up having to sigh in failure and say, ‘Well, here’s the outcome of the project as it stands to far,’” he said. “That would be, I think, the worst outcome for me. That I have to present the testament to its failure.”

‘The Xenotext: Book 1’ is available from Coach House Books in paperback, e-book, or PDF.

Image credits: Dr. Michael Daly (Deinococcus radiodurans, modified); International Festival of Authors (Bök portrait); Coach House Books (‘The Xenotext’ graphic, modified).

30
Dec

Engineer creates functional concrete ‘Satisfaction’ record


German engineer Ricardo Kocadag has developed what he claims is the “first concrete record,” built from a high-performance concrete developed for high-rise buildings and bridges. The idea was not to dramatically increase the weight of your music collection, but rather to show that the load-supporting material can also be finely finished and detailed. A type of “ultra high-performance concrete,” or UHPC, it’s often used on unusually-shaped, detailed structures like the Fondation Louis Vuitton in Paris.

As such, he appropriately chose a piece of the Rolling Stones’ (I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction to cut into the 6mm slab (music concrète might have been more appropriate if not so obscure). We hate to harsh out the good vibes, but in fact the “first concrete record in human history” was already made by another company, and we doubt even that was the first. Nevertheless, the sound quality on Kocadag’s mini-LP is superior, and is playable on a regular turntable, as you can see in the video from BFM.FM below.

Via: Fact Mag

Source: BAM (German)

30
Dec

Google will not use Java APIs in Android N


Google has announced that it will move away from Java application programming interfaces (APIs) in favor of OpenJDK from Android N onwards. It is noteworthy that OpenJDK is an open-source version of Oracle’s Java Development Kit, whereas the search engine giant was facing a copyright infringement suit over the use of Java APIs.

The move may not bring any visible changes for an average Android user, but a common Java codebase is supposed to make app development a much simpler task.

“As an open-source platform, Android is built upon the collaboration of the open-source community. In our upcoming release of Android, we plan to move Android’s Java language libraries to an OpenJDK-based approach, creating a common code base for developers to build apps and services. Google has long worked with and contributed to the OpenJDK community, and we look forward to making even more contributions to the OpenJDK project in the future.”                                                                                 – Google spokesperson

In 2010, Oracle had dragged Google to court over the improper use of its Java APIs. A court decision in 2012 had ruled in favor of Google, who had argued that the Java APIs were essential for software innovation. In 2014, a Federal court, however, reversed that decision.

While Google recently revealed that its dispute with Oracle hasn’t settled yet, it refused to comment on whether the code change is related to that. If you ask us, the code change is a good news indeed for a common Android user as new apps will be developed easily and app updates will be faster.

Via: Android Authority

The post Google will not use Java APIs in Android N appeared first on AndroidGuys.

30
Dec

Charge, store, and more with the Mosaic (Review)


As we continue to keep more and more of our lives on our devices, we realize that the majority of them are lacking when it comes to two big areas: storage and battery life. With many of us keeping tons of movies, pictures, documents, and more on our phones, tablets, and other devices, we are taking up more storage and using more battery than ever before.

Of course, the amount of times we have actually accessed these items are pretty low. We keep movies on our phone for long car rides, plane trips, and times when we don’t have an internet connection and need some entertainment. We keep photos so we can look back and remember moments in our lives. However, we don’t normally need these things on a daily basis, but we still like to keep them with us for one reason or another.

So what do you do? You can keep them on your phone and use up that valuable storage, you can offload them to the cloud which will require you to waste data to view them, or you can put them on a microSD card or microUSB flash drive. This last method is what many people do, but there are fewer and fewer phones with microSD card slots and having a flash drive hanging out of your phone isn’t the most elegant solution.

Enter, the Mosaic from PowerStick. It is the end-all, be-all for your storage and power needs. Not only is the Mosaic a power bank, but it also serves as a wireless storage device and even works as a WiFi extender for when you need a signal boost.

Design and Build Quality

The design of the Mosaic is minimalistic with a white plastic body and a soft plastic underside to keep it secure in a table. The Mosaic logo is on the top of the device in a chopped up style that is simple but eyecatching. Overall, it is fairly small with a 5″x3″ body that stands less than an inch tall. This plus its light weight make it easy to toss in a bag and carry with you without taking up much space or weighing you down.

Mosaic contentsThere is a single button on the left side along with three LEDs for indicating battery level, transfer mode, and WiFi mode. On the back, you’ll find the USB type-A port for charging your devices, and on the front, you can see the USB type-C port for charging the Mosaic itself.

The Mosaic comes with a rigid case with room for the charging cable, tablet charger adapter, and user guide. It’s rigid outside and soft inside means this case will also help protect your Mosaic from any drops or damage.

Using the Mosaic

The Mosaic can do many things, but let’s take them one at a time. First off, it serves as either a 4500mAh or 7000mAh power bank (depending on your configuration) to keep your devices fully charged throughout the day. With that much power at your disposal, you can fully charge almost any phone or tablet out there at least once with many able to fully charge two times or more. This means that you should never find yourself with a dead device during a camping trip or long car ride.

Mosaic frontThe Mosaic charges with a USB type-C connector, but it comes with a USB type-A to USB type-C cable for those of you (like me) who don’t have any devices that use USB type-C. Don’t worry though, the port used to charge your device from the Mosaic is still USB type-A so all of your microUSB cables will work. The remaining battery percentage is displayed by an LED light on the side that turns from green to red when the battery drops to 20%.

Mosaic AppThe biggest draw of the Mosaic is its wireless storage capabilities. The Mosaic emits its own wireless signal, and once you connect to it in you WiFi settings, you can access all that you have stored on it through the companion app. This means you can watch movies stored on the Mosaic without having to connect it to your phone.
The Mosaic comes in several configurations so you can select the storage that you need. You can get a 7000mAh power bank with storage options from 16GB all the way to 256GB.

One awesome part about this wireless storage is that it allows up to seven people to access different items at one time. So if your kids are going to be stuck in the car for a long time, you can give them each a phone or tablet and they can all watch different movies all stored on the Mosaic. There are tons of scenarios where this wireless file access would be useful.

I used the Mosaic to store pictures, a movie, and some documents, and I found that accessing them was extremely easy and simple. Unfortunately, you must use a computer to add and delete files from the Mosaic which means you cannot upload pictures and videos you take on your phone directly to the Mosaic. This was slightly disappointing, but it did not detract from how well the Mosaic acts as a wireless storage device.

The Mosaic app has storage divided up into videos, pictures, photos, and documents. You can connect it to your computer and store your files in their respective group to make sure they are easier to find. When it came to watching videos off the Mosaic, I found that while most major formats will play back just fine, MP4 seems to play back the best. I had one or two slight pauses in other video formats.

Mosaic side

As an added bonus, the Mosaic can act as a WiFi extender to give you an extra signal boost when you cannot get closer to your router. My room is on the other end of the house from the router, and the Mosaic provided a noticeable signal improvement. I usually suffer from some connection drops, but the signal stayed strong when connected through the Mosaic.

After using the Mosaic for a few weeks, I have been extremely impressed with how well it has handled being a power bank, storage device, and WiFi extender in one. It went from something I was skeptical about to a device that has a permanent spot in my bag. I do wish that I could transfer files from my phone to the Mosaic without using a computer, but that has been my only problem with the Mosaic so far.

If you like to keep lots of movies, photos, documents, or anything else with you but don’t want to take up precious storage in your phone, I would highly recommend taking a look at the Mosaic. It is sleek, portable, and powerful. While it is considerably more expensive than a regular power bank or microSD card with the lowest storage model starting at $130, the convenience of wireless storage plus having everything wrapped into one makes it well worth it. You can get the Mosaic by Powerstick in any of its configurations by clicking on the corresponding button below!

Get your 16GB Mosaic!Get your 32GB Mosaic!Get your 64GB Mosaic!Get your 128GB Mosaic!Get your 256GB Mosaic!

 

The post Charge, store, and more with the Mosaic (Review) appeared first on AndroidGuys.

30
Dec

Charge, store, and more with the Mosaic (Review)


As we continue to keep more and more of our lives on our devices, we realize that the majority of them are lacking when it comes to two big areas: storage and battery life. With many of us keeping tons of movies, pictures, documents, and more on our phones, tablets, and other devices, we are taking up more storage and using more battery than ever before.

Of course, the amount of times we have actually accessed these items are pretty low. We keep movies on our phone for long car rides, plane trips, and times when we don’t have an internet connection and need some entertainment. We keep photos so we can look back and remember moments in our lives. However, we don’t normally need these things on a daily basis, but we still like to keep them with us for one reason or another.

So what do you do? You can keep them on your phone and use up that valuable storage, you can offload them to the cloud which will require you to waste data to view them, or you can put them on a microSD card or microUSB flash drive. This last method is what many people do, but there are fewer and fewer phones with microSD card slots and having a flash drive hanging out of your phone isn’t the most elegant solution.

Enter, the Mosaic from PowerStick. It is the end-all, be-all for your storage and power needs. Not only is the Mosaic a power bank, but it also serves as a wireless storage device and even works as a WiFi extender for when you need a signal boost.

Design and Build Quality

The design of the Mosaic is minimalistic with a white plastic body and a soft plastic underside to keep it secure in a table. The Mosaic logo is on the top of the device in a chopped up style that is simple but eyecatching. Overall, it is fairly small with a 5″x3″ body that stands less than an inch tall. This plus its light weight make it easy to toss in a bag and carry with you without taking up much space or weighing you down.

Mosaic contentsThere is a single button on the left side along with three LEDs for indicating battery level, transfer mode, and WiFi mode. On the back, you’ll find the USB type-A port for charging your devices, and on the front, you can see the USB type-C port for charging the Mosaic itself.

The Mosaic comes with a rigid case with room for the charging cable, tablet charger adapter, and user guide. It’s rigid outside and soft inside means this case will also help protect your Mosaic from any drops or damage.

Using the Mosaic

The Mosaic can do many things, but let’s take them one at a time. First off, it serves as either a 4500mAh or 7000mAh power bank (depending on your configuration) to keep your devices fully charged throughout the day. With that much power at your disposal, you can fully charge almost any phone or tablet out there at least once with many able to fully charge two times or more. This means that you should never find yourself with a dead device during a camping trip or long car ride.

Mosaic frontThe Mosaic charges with a USB type-C connector, but it comes with a USB type-A to USB type-C cable for those of you (like me) who don’t have any devices that use USB type-C. Don’t worry though, the port used to charge your device from the Mosaic is still USB type-A so all of your microUSB cables will work. The remaining battery percentage is displayed by an LED light on the side that turns from green to red when the battery drops to 20%.

Mosaic AppThe biggest draw of the Mosaic is its wireless storage capabilities. The Mosaic emits its own wireless signal, and once you connect to it in you WiFi settings, you can access all that you have stored on it through the companion app. This means you can watch movies stored on the Mosaic without having to connect it to your phone.
The Mosaic comes in several configurations so you can select the storage that you need. You can get a 7000mAh power bank with storage options from 16GB all the way to 256GB.

One awesome part about this wireless storage is that it allows up to seven people to access different items at one time. So if your kids are going to be stuck in the car for a long time, you can give them each a phone or tablet and they can all watch different movies all stored on the Mosaic. There are tons of scenarios where this wireless file access would be useful.

I used the Mosaic to store pictures, a movie, and some documents, and I found that accessing them was extremely easy and simple. Unfortunately, you must use a computer to add and delete files from the Mosaic which means you cannot upload pictures and videos you take on your phone directly to the Mosaic. This was slightly disappointing, but it did not detract from how well the Mosaic acts as a wireless storage device.

The Mosaic app has storage divided up into videos, pictures, photos, and documents. You can connect it to your computer and store your files in their respective group to make sure they are easier to find. When it came to watching videos off the Mosaic, I found that while most major formats will play back just fine, MP4 seems to play back the best. I had one or two slight pauses in other video formats.

Mosaic side

As an added bonus, the Mosaic can act as a WiFi extender to give you an extra signal boost when you cannot get closer to your router. My room is on the other end of the house from the router, and the Mosaic provided a noticeable signal improvement. I usually suffer from some connection drops, but the signal stayed strong when connected through the Mosaic.

After using the Mosaic for a few weeks, I have been extremely impressed with how well it has handled being a power bank, storage device, and WiFi extender in one. It went from something I was skeptical about to a device that has a permanent spot in my bag. I do wish that I could transfer files from my phone to the Mosaic without using a computer, but that has been my only problem with the Mosaic so far.

If you like to keep lots of movies, photos, documents, or anything else with you but don’t want to take up precious storage in your phone, I would highly recommend taking a look at the Mosaic. It is sleek, portable, and powerful. While it is considerably more expensive than a regular power bank or microSD card with the lowest storage model starting at $130, the convenience of wireless storage plus having everything wrapped into one makes it well worth it. You can get the Mosaic by Powerstick in any of its configurations by clicking on the corresponding button below!

Get your 16GB Mosaic!Get your 32GB Mosaic!Get your 64GB Mosaic!Get your 128GB Mosaic!Get your 256GB Mosaic!

 

The post Charge, store, and more with the Mosaic (Review) appeared first on AndroidGuys.

30
Dec

Samsung to show off three Creative Lab projects at CES 2016


Samsung Creative Lab rink

Samsung will be showcasing three projects to have come out of its Creative Lab (C-Lab) initiative at CES in just a few days’ time. The company will be gathering feedback on its rather oddly named WELT, rink and TipTalk ideas. Samsung’s C-Lab projects are basically the results of giving a number of the company’s engineers free reign to flex their creative muscles.

We’ll start with WELT, a smart wearable health and fitness tracker that looks like a belt. WELT features the familiar step counting and eating habit features from other fitness trackers, but can also monitor your waist size and the amount of time that you spend sitting down.

rink builds on Samsung’s work in the emerging virtual reality platform, offering up a hand-motion controller for mobile VR devices that presumably works something like a slimmed down Wii remote. However the device isn’t held, instead it wraps around your hands.

C-Lab_welt1_Main
C-Lab_tiptalk1_Main

Finally, TipTalk. Another oddly named product but it’s probably the most intriguing one out of the three. TipTalk appears like any ordinary watch strap but actually contains its own communication device. It syncs up to a smartphone and plays back speech or music without the need for a headset or headphones. Instead you simply touch your finger to your ear, secret agent style, and presumably some form of bone conduction is used to transmit sound to your inner ear. Samsung says that this is particularly useful in noisy environments.

These three Creative Lab projects will be showcased at Eureka Park, the destination for startups at CES, from January 6th to 9th. Samsung has plenty more creative projects in the works too.

30
Dec

Report: Samsung and LG to supply AMOLED panels for new iPhones


AMOLED, OLED, EL, SAMOLED, YOUM, POLED: whatever abbreviation one chooses to give organic display technology, they all describe the same basic results: deep inky blacks, vibrant colors, and near infinite contrast. Samsung has made a name for its Galaxy S and Galaxy Note series in part, because of the Super AMOLED panels the devices make use of. Even LG has gotten into the game with its G Flex series, and smartwatches. Now however, it seems that both companies are going to be working hard to put out panels for…Apple.

According to a new report published today by Korean site etNews, the contracts have been finalized and are simply awaiting signatures to officiate. The possibly pending production won’t come cheap however, and will apparently require Samsung and LG to invest a total of $12.8 billion over the next 2 or 3 years, some of which Apple itself may help finance.

LG’s lines

LG Display 18-inch flexible OLED panel

The source goes on to state that LG Display, which already has experience in supplying displays for Apple, “has had relatively smooth contract discussions” and is simply awaiting a signature to solidify the deal. Furthermore, LG may now begin to “reduce…investments for facilities by changing current LCD lines to flexible OLED lines.”

LG Display may begin by first supplying 30,000 panels per month on a Generation 6 board. Upon reaching a stable production yeild, the Korean OEM will then increase supply of anywhere between 45,000 to 60,000 sheets per month. Given the relatively small numbers being discussed – for reference iPhones sell tens of millions – , it is stated that:

Because flexible OLEDs that are produced from Gen 4.5 (E3) Line in Paju do not have any experience in 6th Generation, LG Display is planning to start small and gradually expand its size. From 1 sheet of Gen. 6 glass substrate, 288 5-inch cellphone panels can be produced. If LG Display increases production capability up to 60,000 sheets in the future, it will be able to mass-produce 200 million 5-inch OLED panels per year.

Samsung’s story

super-amoled-technical-details

On the other side of the competitive aisle, Samsung is quoted at receiving 30% more allocation than LG Display because of its current production facilities that already allow for high yields. Specifically, Samsung is quoted with a figure of around 90,000 sheets each month, for a 2 or 3 year period.

EtNews goes on to state that,

Negotiation between Samsung and Apple is not going too smoothly. It is heard that both businesses’ stances are considerably tense on unit cost of products, technical cooperation, advance investments, and others. Because unit cost that Apple is requesting is excessively low while level of technical cooperation is high, there can be a chance where somehow Samsung’s major know-hows can flow into Apple.

Cost is cited as a major factor here, noting that:

Samsung Display was able to collect considerable amount of operating profit as it was supplying Smartphone OLEDs to China. Smartphone OLED is a major profitable product that has higher profit rate than LCD. However as Apple is requesting one-digit percent margin, negotiation is not progressing too smoothly.

Other problems listed include Apple’s well-publicized “hands on” approach to product development, something that Samsung is allegedly concerned with as it may ultimately allow competitors to reap the benefits in terms of production know-how.

Galaxy S6 Edge AMOLED display

The piece then ends with a quote from an unspecified person within the industry:

Although Samsung Display and LG Display are planning to start supply their OLEDs to Apple starting from 2018, they can start supplying OLEDs as early as 2017…Although Apple is requesting large amount of supplies from the start, they are carefully going over size of investments for facilities because panel manufacturers can be financially burdened since there will be more supplies than demands in the future.

The situation room

While the idea of Apple adopting AMOLED display panels has been floating around the rumor mills for seemingly ages now, this is arguably one of the most solid assertions that such a transitioning phase has begun. Just weeks ag

AMOLED is also a potentially big source of money for both Samsung and LG, two companies that have fallen on harder times given the intense, keen competition from smartphone and tablet manufacturers in China and India. Both companies have seen their market share erode over the past two years, and both have taken more dramatic steps to try and find a profitable picture beyond end-user product sales.

Flexible AMOLED revenue forecast

LG recently reorganized itself to allow its display division greater speed and agility. Samsung’s CEO even went all out and basically warned of a path to ruin less the company makes major changes now. In addition to this, on another tangent, a rumor has broken out suggesting neither company will make the jump to 4K displays in their 2016 flagships and Samsung in particular, allegedly opting to release a Galaxy S7 that has very little visual differences going on compares with this year’s model.

Meanwhile, AMOLED was recently reported with having its most profitable quarter yet, and Samsung taking a lion’s share of the profits, with 95.8% of the market. HTC has used an AMOLED panel in its One A9, OnePlus uses them for the X one, Apple uses them in the Apple Watch units, LG uses them in its LG G Watch R and Urbane series as well as the – possibly discontinued – G Flex series. Even Samsung has made it a proper priority to place these panels in plenty of its non pinnacle of premium products.

Pwned by OLED?

Despite the claims of OLED panels offering superior battery life thanks to individual pixel backlighting and thus blacks require none whatsoever, the results are oddly polarizing. While some absolutely love AMOLED and refuse to buy anything that’s not making use of it, others have a decidedly different perspective, calling it oversaturated, cartoonish, or undesirable.

HTC One A9 Display Settings

HTC One A9 (unlocked, international) has a Color profile setting with four different options.

While Samsung has featured “Screen Mode” settings for years now, even HTC and Google have gotten in on the action. Perhaps dye to the requirements of finding the correct menu selection setting however, most users still seem to be unaware the “hyper” realistic color schemes can be reduced.

In a recent poll on Google Plus, Android Authority community users were asked which they preferred, AMOLED or LCD. As of the time of publishing, 1,341 users had participated and the results were split with 86% favoring the former, and just 14% liking the latter.

AMOLED Poll

It is almost a given that Apple users will take to AMOLED should this news pan out, especially considering that many already cite the use of laminated glass as giving the devices fantastic color reproduction as is due to the lack of air between the glass and display.

And about Android?

Bringing this piece back to Android, two potential points are worth mentioning:

  1. By the time Apple finally does manage to implement AMOLED displays into its iPhones – many state it wouldn’t happen until at least 2017 – Android OEMs may very well be widely using the panels. Currently Samsung, LG, OnePlus, Huawei, HTC, and Motorola have released products in the past year that make use of them, and potentially more in the year to come.
  2. In the event OEMs aren’t using AMOLED by the time Apple does, it is highly possible they may switch over due to the general public’s inevitable “wake up call” to the technology.

An increase in AMOLED use may in turn have other effects on Google’s mobile OS. For example it would be conceivable that Google could formally introduce Night Mode to capitalize on the technology’s use of black colors to save power. Likewise, it might follow that “Active Notification” options become more standard for Android.

Moto X Active Display and Notifications

Moto X: Active Display and Active Notifications | Image Credit: Android Police

Increased competition in the AMOLED market might also ultimately spur Samsung and LG to create new types of screens and further advance the progression of bendable, foldable, and wearable displays.

LCD prices would possibly fall if demand shifts to AMOLED, which might increase the quality of panels seen on lower-end smartphones, devices that typically avoid things such as IPS LCD due to the extra costs involved. It is worth mentioning that Quantum Dot, Pixel Eyes, and IGZO are all competitors to AMOLED, and that – as ASUS often does – it’s also possible to include color profile adjustment settings on LCD displays as well.

On the other hand, should Apple start buying large quantities of AMOLED panels in bulk, it might drive up the price for the technology considerably, a cost that might be passed onto the customer. It might also mean that OEMs go for inferior AMOLED panels to save money.

It is actually worth posing the question: why did Motorola drop AMOLED from the Moto X Style (Pure Edition) when both the original Moto X and the Moto X (2014) made use of it. Could it be due to pricing/cost related issues? Notice the Moto X Force (Droid Turbo 2) makes use of an AMOLED panel, yet costs considerably more.

Wrap Up

LCD vs AMOLED

The idea of Apple transitioning to AMOLED panels is nothing new, but the news of a possible contracted agreement to begin the process is a very big development. It is highly unlikely Apple itself would make a press release of the venture given the tendencies it has to keep non-internal component related business dealings as low key as possible. Consider that the company, to this day, still does not mention Gorilla Glass, nor does it make a point to mention the companies who supply the components for its products. The list includes Samsung, LG, Sony, Sharp, and many more, yet all the mainstream public hears about is Apple’s A9 Soc or Apple’s camera.

We are eager to hear your take on this matter. Does Apple’s potentially making use of AMOLED have a collective benefit in the business, or will it make things worse? Is Apple eager to make use of the power saving features, or does it just want to “copy” Android OEMs? Would an AMOLED iPhone potentially spell trouble for LCD Android devices in terms of the mainstream consumer’s decision making process?

Please leave your comments below and let us know!

(function ()
document.getElementsByTagName(‘body’)[0]).appendChild(opst);
());

30
Dec

Pixel, See? Why Google’s latest tablet is (mostly) all it’s cracked up to be


Pixel C-14

Since it was first announced in September, the Pixel C has confounded customers, if not the industry-at-large. Why isn’t Google releasing a new Nexus tablet, yet is releasing a Pixel tablet? The former goes hand in hand with Android, the latter with Chrome OS. To this day there exists confusion among customers who are unclear as to what operating system the new product runs.

Reviews and editorials for the Pixel C have also been highly divisive. While some sites have praised the product profoundly, others have taken a far more critical, analytical view. We have also offered our own take on the product. Given the dual dichotomy of dissent going on here, it seems particularly pertinent to analyze the Pixel C with respect to the nature of criticism it has received.

Let’s get started with a look at why the Pixel C is actually not as bad as some might suggest.

Pixel C

.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;

.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;

.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;

@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;

@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;

body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;

body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;

The “premier” Android tablet?

To this day there exist very few Android tablets that can truly go head-to-head with Apple’s iPad, at least in terms of design and build quality. This is not to suggest Cupertino has a superior offering mind you, rather just the reality that is demonstrated time and time again by mainstream consumer’s overwhelming decision to purchase iPads over anything else.

samsung-galaxy-tab-s2-8-3

Samsung’s 2015 flagship tablet, the Galaxy Tab S2, does indeed pack some super solid specs, yet it’s ultimately still using a plastic back and running TouchWiz which is decidedly not everyone’s cup of tea. Google itself has released some very popular tablets over the years, namely the Nexus 7 (2012) and Nexus 7 (2013), as well as some more overlooked considerations, the Nexus 10 and Nexus 9. The criticism has always been about the build quality though: they are just not on-par with an Apple offering.

The Pixel C is, hands down, the most solid and solidified tablet Google has produced. With an all-metal casing, the device feels substantial in the hands – a bit too heavy perhaps – and has stereo speakers as well as USB C connectivity. It truly looks less like a traditional tablet and more like a convertible tablet computer, something that evidence suggests may have been Google’s original intention.

In defense of Google: the Pixel C is “perfect” (almost)

While comments relating to Pixel C’s lack of multitasking and software bugs are valid ones, it may be that – especially with the former of the two – critics are being a bit too harsh with the product. Let’s explore why.

Pixel C’s intended market

Nexus 9 Keyboard Folio-16

The Nexus 9 with its official Folio Keyboard.

Much of the criticism for the Pixel C has stemmed from a perception that its new tablet is specifically targeting a productivity-minded customer. The reason? It has an expensive keyboard add-on. And yet. The Nexus 9 also has an expensive keyboard add-on, and yet that tablet seemingly didn’t receive anywhere close to the near-universal trashing of the product’s productivity in reviews. For that matter, just about every tablet on the market has some form of keyboard add-on, be it Bluetooth or otherwise; official or not.

Where is it explicitly stated Pixel C is specifically aimed at corporate customers or those who want a laptop replacement? Just because Google launched it showcasing the keyboard should not automatically imply it will have all kinds of modified software components to significantly alter the Android user experience for the tablet.

Pixel C’s actual market

Microsoft Surface Book 2

Why do some people seem to think the Pixel C is supposed to be Google’s Surface Book?

Despite the vocal crowd typically commenting on tech-related stories and coverage, the mainstream majority of the world’s population doesn’t actively care about tech. They don’t actively follow tech sites and check for updates multiple times throughout the day. In fact, even mainstream Apple customers don’t necessarily know their company has announced a new product until it’s literally in front of them at a store or a major headline on a general news site.

It is well established that the Nexus line has never achieved mainstream success, with some evidence suggesting it doesn’t even achieve niche success. There is a very limited number of customers who want such products, especially in the face of a thousand other OEMs making their own. Those who want a Nexus device are very much about having the cleanest, most simplistic form of Android possible. Those who want a Nexus are also, more likely than not, individuals who are more knowledge about devices than the average customer, and/or who actively follow Google related news.

Jide Remix Ultra Surface tablet keyboard

Would the Jide Remx Ultra be a better crowd pleaser for those upset with the Pixel C?

The Pixel C, at the moment at least, is not being sold in stores. The Pixel C is, at the moment at least, only available directly from Google. To this end, there is an extremely limited number of consumers who will potentially even know about it, much less who will want it, and even less still who will actually purchase it.

Criticism of a $500 device not having adequate software is subjective at best when considering that those who purchase the product arguably know what they’re getting from the get-go. Google never promised multitasking support, nor did it ever mention an optimized Android experience for the Pixel C. Just because Microsoft and Apple have something hardly means Google must suddenly unveil it as well.

The Android environment

Android-Tablets-Sizes-Compared

Perhaps the most fundamental defense of Google’s Pixel C is the competition, specifically within the Android hardware community. There are hundreds of tablets on the market, and with that means hundreds of Android on tablet experiences. Those who absolutely must have multitasking now can easily get a Samsung Galaxy Tab S2, or an Xperia Z4 Tablet, or many others for that matter.

The brilliance of Android is, and has always been, choice. If you don’t like one, get another instead. If you want a specific feature, buy a specific product. Simple and sublime. And you know what? Google knows this and therefore doesn’t need to care if its custom made creation is up your alley…or not.

Irrational Wants

Pixel C-39

I want that one!

Ironically this particular idea can best be seen in a recent opinion piece Engadget had about the difficulty reviewers often have in actually purchasing a product. In it, Managing Editor, Dana Wollman, muses that:

I’ve come to love gadgets, and have strong opinions about them. Which is why I’m not good at shopping for them. I suppose some of my readers are equally picky. For each of you who chooses on principle to be an early adopter, there are some who have been putting off a purchase for months, or years, all because you’re too discerning for your own good. You’re not gadget reviewers, but perhaps you too have done a little too much research. And perhaps like me, you’re perpetually waiting for a product that doesn’t yet exist.

Her story is perhaps shared by many in the tech-enthusiast crowd. The idea that people are always waiting for a perfect product is definitely a sound one, as is the notion that for every early adopter there can be just as many who agonize for ages to buy but one “simple” smartphone. As applied to the Pixel C it also works wonders: the reviewers around the globe are being too callous to Google’s creation. They are blasting it for expectations of what they want and believe a product should be, even if that’s not the product Google itself sought to create.

For every reviewer that may blast the perceived missing features in this new tablet, there may just as well be scores of potential customers who don’t give a crap and absolute adore the Pixel C for everything it is. A premium tablet. A Google tablet. An Android tablet. A Pixel tablet. The same even holds true to the iPad Pro: reviewers quickly chastised it for not running a “full OS” and cited wasted space and other issues. Yet it’s safe to bet most people who buy the extra-large fruit form won’t care in the slightest.

Pixel C-24

Although…

It is worth mentioning, for the sake of argument, that the “C” in the Pixel C, means “Convertible”. It implies that the device is meant to be used in two different ways. Perhaps even more importantly, in the AMA on reddit, the Pixel C team itself dropped some bombshells in terms of mentioning multitasking support and other tid-bits. Clearly there is a concerted effort to do perhaps more with the product, but for whatever reason, things didn’t work out for the launch.

At the very least, Google could have included the keyboard with the product if it really wanted to push the convertibility factor.

The earlier idea comes back up though: just because the Pixel C can’t do multitasking and doesn’t come with a keyboard doesn’t make it a bad tablet.

Wrap up

Pixel C-35

The Pixel C is a fascinating new product from Google, yet one that many might argue fails to live up to its potential. Unfortunately said commentary is largely based on a self-perceived notion that the device should have “standard” features like multitasking and an included keyboard. Funny how Microsoft also showcases the Surface tablets with their respective Smart Cover keyboards and yet doesn’t include one in the box.

It may be a fair consideration that Google has yet to make Android for tablets a truly productive environment, but that argument should not be the basis on which one seeks to knock the Pixel C. It is a rare, truly premium Android slate that has excellent battery life, a high resolution display, runs the latest build of the OS, and won’t break the bank to buy.

The Pixel C may not be truly a perfect device, but who is to say it’s not every bit the sum of its parts?

(function ()
document.getElementsByTagName(‘body’)[0]).appendChild(opst);
());

30
Dec

Pixel, See? Why Google’s latest tablet is (mostly) all it’s cracked up to be


Pixel C-14

Since it was first announced in September, the Pixel C has confounded customers, if not the industry-at-large. Why isn’t Google releasing a new Nexus tablet, yet is releasing a Pixel tablet? The former goes hand in hand with Android, the latter with Chrome OS. To this day there exists confusion among customers who are unclear as to what operating system the new product runs.

Reviews and editorials for the Pixel C have also been highly divisive. While some sites have praised the product profoundly, others have taken a far more critical, analytical view. We have also offered our own take on the product. Given the dual dichotomy of dissent going on here, it seems particularly pertinent to analyze the Pixel C with respect to the nature of criticism it has received.

Let’s get started with a look at why the Pixel C is actually not as bad as some might suggest.

Pixel C

.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;

.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;

.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;

@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;

@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;

body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;

body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;

The “premier” Android tablet?

To this day there exist very few Android tablets that can truly go head-to-head with Apple’s iPad, at least in terms of design and build quality. This is not to suggest Cupertino has a superior offering mind you, rather just the reality that is demonstrated time and time again by mainstream consumer’s overwhelming decision to purchase iPads over anything else.

samsung-galaxy-tab-s2-8-3

Samsung’s 2015 flagship tablet, the Galaxy Tab S2, does indeed pack some super solid specs, yet it’s ultimately still using a plastic back and running TouchWiz which is decidedly not everyone’s cup of tea. Google itself has released some very popular tablets over the years, namely the Nexus 7 (2012) and Nexus 7 (2013), as well as some more overlooked considerations, the Nexus 10 and Nexus 9. The criticism has always been about the build quality though: they are just not on-par with an Apple offering.

The Pixel C is, hands down, the most solid and solidified tablet Google has produced. With an all-metal casing, the device feels substantial in the hands – a bit too heavy perhaps – and has stereo speakers as well as USB C connectivity. It truly looks less like a traditional tablet and more like a convertible tablet computer, something that evidence suggests may have been Google’s original intention.

In defense of Google: the Pixel C is “perfect” (almost)

While comments relating to Pixel C’s lack of multitasking and software bugs are valid ones, it may be that – especially with the former of the two – critics are being a bit too harsh with the product. Let’s explore why.

Pixel C’s intended market

Nexus 9 Keyboard Folio-16

The Nexus 9 with its official Folio Keyboard.

Much of the criticism for the Pixel C has stemmed from a perception that its new tablet is specifically targeting a productivity-minded customer. The reason? It has an expensive keyboard add-on. And yet. The Nexus 9 also has an expensive keyboard add-on, and yet that tablet seemingly didn’t receive anywhere close to the near-universal trashing of the product’s productivity in reviews. For that matter, just about every tablet on the market has some form of keyboard add-on, be it Bluetooth or otherwise; official or not.

Where is it explicitly stated Pixel C is specifically aimed at corporate customers or those who want a laptop replacement? Just because Google launched it showcasing the keyboard should not automatically imply it will have all kinds of modified software components to significantly alter the Android user experience for the tablet.

Pixel C’s actual market

Microsoft Surface Book 2

Why do some people seem to think the Pixel C is supposed to be Google’s Surface Book?

Despite the vocal crowd typically commenting on tech-related stories and coverage, the mainstream majority of the world’s population doesn’t actively care about tech. They don’t actively follow tech sites and check for updates multiple times throughout the day. In fact, even mainstream Apple customers don’t necessarily know their company has announced a new product until it’s literally in front of them at a store or a major headline on a general news site.

It is well established that the Nexus line has never achieved mainstream success, with some evidence suggesting it doesn’t even achieve niche success. There is a very limited number of customers who want such products, especially in the face of a thousand other OEMs making their own. Those who want a Nexus device are very much about having the cleanest, most simplistic form of Android possible. Those who want a Nexus are also, more likely than not, individuals who are more knowledge about devices than the average customer, and/or who actively follow Google related news.

Jide Remix Ultra Surface tablet keyboard

Would the Jide Remx Ultra be a better crowd pleaser for those upset with the Pixel C?

The Pixel C, at the moment at least, is not being sold in stores. The Pixel C is, at the moment at least, only available directly from Google. To this end, there is an extremely limited number of consumers who will potentially even know about it, much less who will want it, and even less still who will actually purchase it.

Criticism of a $500 device not having adequate software is subjective at best when considering that those who purchase the product arguably know what they’re getting from the get-go. Google never promised multitasking support, nor did it ever mention an optimized Android experience for the Pixel C. Just because Microsoft and Apple have something hardly means Google must suddenly unveil it as well.

The Android environment

Android-Tablets-Sizes-Compared

Perhaps the most fundamental defense of Google’s Pixel C is the competition, specifically within the Android hardware community. There are hundreds of tablets on the market, and with that means hundreds of Android on tablet experiences. Those who absolutely must have multitasking now can easily get a Samsung Galaxy Tab S2, or an Xperia Z4 Tablet, or many others for that matter.

The brilliance of Android is, and has always been, choice. If you don’t like one, get another instead. If you want a specific feature, buy a specific product. Simple and sublime. And you know what? Google knows this and therefore doesn’t need to care if its custom made creation is up your alley…or not.

Irrational Wants

Pixel C-39

I want that one!

Ironically this particular idea can best be seen in a recent opinion piece Engadget had about the difficulty reviewers often have in actually purchasing a product. In it, Managing Editor, Dana Wollman, muses that:

I’ve come to love gadgets, and have strong opinions about them. Which is why I’m not good at shopping for them. I suppose some of my readers are equally picky. For each of you who chooses on principle to be an early adopter, there are some who have been putting off a purchase for months, or years, all because you’re too discerning for your own good. You’re not gadget reviewers, but perhaps you too have done a little too much research. And perhaps like me, you’re perpetually waiting for a product that doesn’t yet exist.

Her story is perhaps shared by many in the tech-enthusiast crowd. The idea that people are always waiting for a perfect product is definitely a sound one, as is the notion that for every early adopter there can be just as many who agonize for ages to buy but one “simple” smartphone. As applied to the Pixel C it also works wonders: the reviewers around the globe are being too callous to Google’s creation. They are blasting it for expectations of what they want and believe a product should be, even if that’s not the product Google itself sought to create.

For every reviewer that may blast the perceived missing features in this new tablet, there may just as well be scores of potential customers who don’t give a crap and absolute adore the Pixel C for everything it is. A premium tablet. A Google tablet. An Android tablet. A Pixel tablet. The same even holds true to the iPad Pro: reviewers quickly chastised it for not running a “full OS” and cited wasted space and other issues. Yet it’s safe to bet most people who buy the extra-large fruit form won’t care in the slightest.

Pixel C-24

Although…

It is worth mentioning, for the sake of argument, that the “C” in the Pixel C, means “Convertible”. It implies that the device is meant to be used in two different ways. Perhaps even more importantly, in the AMA on reddit, the Pixel C team itself dropped some bombshells in terms of mentioning multitasking support and other tid-bits. Clearly there is a concerted effort to do perhaps more with the product, but for whatever reason, things didn’t work out for the launch.

At the very least, Google could have included the keyboard with the product if it really wanted to push the convertibility factor.

The earlier idea comes back up though: just because the Pixel C can’t do multitasking and doesn’t come with a keyboard doesn’t make it a bad tablet.

Wrap up

Pixel C-35

The Pixel C is a fascinating new product from Google, yet one that many might argue fails to live up to its potential. Unfortunately said commentary is largely based on a self-perceived notion that the device should have “standard” features like multitasking and an included keyboard. Funny how Microsoft also showcases the Surface tablets with their respective Smart Cover keyboards and yet doesn’t include one in the box.

It may be a fair consideration that Google has yet to make Android for tablets a truly productive environment, but that argument should not be the basis on which one seeks to knock the Pixel C. It is a rare, truly premium Android slate that has excellent battery life, a high resolution display, runs the latest build of the OS, and won’t break the bank to buy.

The Pixel C may not be truly a perfect device, but who is to say it’s not every bit the sum of its parts?

(function ()
var opst = document.createElement(‘script’);
var os_host = document.location.protocol == “https:” ? “https:” : “http:”;
opst.type = ‘text/javascript’;
opst.async = true;
opst.src = os_host + ‘//’ + ‘www.opinionstage.com/polls/2320073/embed.js’;
(document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0] ());