Skip to content

Archive for

24
Dec

Unlocked Motorola Moto G (2015) receiving Android 6.0 Marshmallow in the US


Moto G 2015 Hands On-11

Following the rollout of Android 6.0 Marshmallow for the Moto X Style, Moto X Pure Edition (2015) and Moto X Pure Edition (2014), it looks like Motorola has begun pushing out the big update to the unlocked Moto G (2015) in the United States. If you own this variant of the budget-friendly device, the update should be waiting for you.

As previously noted, the update to Android 6.0 Marshmallow will bring a ton of new improvements and features, including Doze mode, more granular app permission controls, Google Now on Tap, Android Pay, and much simpler volume controls. Also, Motorola will be taking away a few features with the Marshmallow update, including Moto Assist, Motorola Migrate, and the Google Chrome extension for Motorola Connect. Motorola claims that there is no need to pre-install these features on their devices anymore because Google provides similar functionality in Android. The company says it wants to compliment Android, not compete with it.


Android 6.0 marshmallow logo DSC_0126See also: Android 6.0 Marshmallow updates roundup – December 18, 201588

Interested in finding out more about the Moto G (2015)? Be sure to check out our full review.

If you have yet to receive the update, head to Settings>About phone>System updates to check manually. Has your Moto G been updated yet? Do you have a different Motorola device that’s gotten the update? If so, be sure to let us know how you’re liking it in the comment section below.

Next: Best cheap Android phones

24
Dec

Confessions of an ab-toning addict


I always thought that those as seen on TV-style ab-toning belts were a con, with only the most credulous of fools being taken in by them. “That’s not a way to get fitter,” scoffed my internal monologue, “it’s a bunch of hocus-pocus and flim-flam.” When Slendertone launched Connect, a smartphone-orientated reinvention of the technology, it seemed like the ideal time to torpedo the concept once and for all. Except I can’t, because I’m increasingly certain that my thinner, flatter stomach is down to wearing this and using it each day. In fact, I’ve gone from being the archetypal doubter to being a stone-cold convert, maybe even an addict.

Slendertone is probably the biggest brand in the niche world of consumer electrical muscle stimulation. It’s a technique predicated upon the fact that passing a current through your muscles will cause them to contract. It’s an FDA-approved process that’s designed to strengthen muscles and has been used by athletes to help improve muscle resistance and blood flow. Its reputation as a practical, effective tool has been tarnished by companies that promise that wearing one of these will help you lose weight or get abs like Brad Pitt’s in Fight Club. They won’t, precisely because the issue isn’t the size of your abdominals, but the quantity of fat that sits in front of them.

The Connect is Slendertone’s latest device that wraps around your stomach in order to juice up your insides. Up front, you’ll find a detachable controller that recharges over micro-USB, while on the other side are three metal electrodes onto which you attach gel pads. These pads conduct the energy from the controller into your guts with a series of short or long pulses, depending on the program that you’ve set. Thankfully, rather than having to use the controller to manually adjust the intensity, you can now use your iPhone (via Bluetooth), giving you much finer control.

The app itself has a variety of set-ups for various programs with anodyne names like Essential Toning, Fitness, Advanced and Upcoming Event. Each of these lasts for six weeks, and you’re expected to wear the belt for five sessions, which normally shake out to be up to 30 mins long. As you progress, you’ll be given FIT Points, which are earned by completing sessions and increasing the intensity beyond what’s expected of you. You’re handed a target of, say, 22 a week, and if you’re prepared for some extra discomfort, can push well past that — I’m on 31.1 for the past seven days.

You know when a doctor tells you, shortly before an injection, that you’re about to feel a slight scratch? That same sort of half-truth applies here, too, since EMS at any useful intensity is kinda-sorta unpleasant, at least initially. Imagine someone grabbing your love handles and shaking your flab at an impossibly high frequency, but the gloves in question have a few metal pins sticking into your flesh. It all sounds a bit nasty, although you very quickly get used to it while sat (or, in my case, stood) at your desk. I’m no masochist, but if I take a day off, I actually start missing the sensation.

The real benefit doesn’t make itself apparent until long after the session has ended, like when you stretch your arms over your head and realize your torso is burning. The muscles, after such an intensive workout are now aching, knitting themselves back together as if you’d spent your morning doing nothing but stomach crunches. It’s the sort of endorphin-bringing discomfort that gym rats and Instagram braggers love to talk about and I’m enjoying it for precisely zero effort. Buried beneath the layers of flab that still adorn my frame, there’s a thinner and significantly more jacked Dan Cooper working hard at his own reinvention. That guy’s so smart and attractive he’s probably a hit with everyone and wears nice suits, which means I already hate him.

As you read this, you’ll be tucking into turkey and booze with only the vaguest of intentions of losing weight after January 1st. You’ll be wondering if this piece of hardware is worth investing in to shed your holiday flab? Yes, although nobody but you is likely to feel the benefit unless you lay off the chips and soda from now on. I’ve been using this device for the better part of eight weeks, racking up more than 22 hours of strength training. With almost no change in my diet, I’ve started to notice my hanging gut recede, at least by half a centimeter. When I suck my stomach in, the effect is so pronounced that it looks as if I don’t have much of a belly at all. Again, this isn’t because ab toning is making me lose weight, but because there’s more muscle behind it to pull the fat in. It’s all anecdotal evidence, too, but I’m certainly going to persist with this to see how far I can go.

Here’s the downside, at least for now: Slendertone Connect isn’t yet available in the US, and the firm has yet to respond to my queries about that situation changing. Here in Europe, it’s available for £179.99 ($267), but we imagine the price will be closer to $179.99 if and when it does make its journey across the Atlantic. For now, Americans will have to make do with the $199 Abs7, which offers a rechargeable battery and built-in controller, but can’t interact with your smartphone. But if you’re in dire need of a way to jumpstart your own revolution, there are few easier ways.

Source: Slendertone

24
Dec

Firefox OS may live on in a TV stick and Pi-powered keyboard


Shortly after Mozilla said that it was done with Firefox OS smartphones, it confirmed that the OS would live on in connected devices. We might now have a better idea of what that means, thanks to a leak from Hipertextual. The Spanish site unearthed several internal Mozilla documents showing a Firefox keyboard, stick, hub and, most unusually, a Raspberry Pi powered keyboard. When queried by Venture Beat, Mozilla confirmed that the devices were “early product concept work by one of our developers,” but wouldn’t say if they were still under development.

The router and TV stick are aimed at the connected home market, a niche where Firefox OS already has a toehold with Panasonic Smart TVs. The goal with the Firefox Stick is to “bring the Firefox OS TV experience to any TV,” in much the same way that NVIDIA’s shield gives a regular TV similar capabilities to, say, the Sony X900C. An earlier attempt at building a Firefox OS stick failed, however, and Firefox conceded that the device “must have DRM and content partnerships to be successful.” The router, meanwhile, would give users a hackable product with built-in privacy controls, and could also function as a web server and connected home devices hub.

The tablet would be “just a web browser,” according to Mozilla, and be targeted at late adopters and the elderly. It wouldn’t be the first Firefox OS slate on the market, but would be an inexpensive, highly pared-back version, lacking an app store, mobile connection and other frills. The keyboard is a more interesting idea, as it would be equipped with a Raspberry Pi, and “dedicated to using and making the web.” Mozilla pointed out that it could be plugged into a spare TV or monitor, making it a cheap computer in nations like India with millions of obsolete TVs. It would be equipped with Mozilla’s Webmaker kit and be useful for web creators, educators and makers.

Mozilla stressed that “we are still at the early stages of exploring and prototyping new use cases for Firefox OS in the world of connected devices as an open source project.” However, as shown in the video below, the company does have concrete plans to develop connected devices similar to the ones leaked here. As for what form they’ll take, we’ll have to wait to find out more — hopefully, in about two weeks, when CES 2016 starts.

Via: Venture Beat

Source: Hipertextual

24
Dec

LG’s V10 is selling well in the U.S.


lg_v10_logo_att_closeup_TA

In 2015, LG released two flagships to maintain consumer interest in the brand; however, little space was left between them. The V10 followed the G4 in a release that came less than six months later. There were many analysts that felt the V10, which is a bit pricy, would have no place in the market. And the handset actually got off to a poor start in LG’s homeland of South Korea. But the same cannot be said for the V10 in the United States as LG has revealed its sales of the handset in the United States.

lg_v10_front_top_closeup_second_screen_TA

LG is proud to announced that 450,000 units of the V10 were sold in the handset’s first 45 days of availability. What attributed to the strong start in sales for the V10, according to the company, were interest in larger phones and an active young customer base. Nearly 40% of V10 owners in the United States are 25-34 years old, indicating that the commercial featuring Joseph Gordon-Levitt is working with decent effectiveness.

Source: LG

Click here to view the embedded video.

Come comment on this article: LG’s V10 is selling well in the U.S.

24
Dec

Deal: buy the Phonejoy GamePad 2 bluetooth controller for 22% off


phonejoy-gamepad-2

It’s one thing to get funded on Kickstarter, but making it to our best Android gifts under $100 and best Bluetooth controllers lists is a whole other feat. PhoneJoy introduced its first Bluetooth controller back in 2012.

We now have the second iteration in the market, and it just so happens to be a very worthy successor. But as we all know, Bluetooth gamepads can get expensive, so it’s a good idea to take advantage of offers like today’s. The AA Deals Store is currently selling the PhoneJoy GamePad 2 for $59.99, a 22% discount over the original price.

Phonejoy featured in:

The PhoneJoy design is quite unique, as it wraps around the phone or tablet to provide maximum comfort while holding both the controller and device. It blends your device and controller, turning them into a single unit.

And don’t even worry about long gaming sessions. This thing will last up to 14 hours alive with active playing on a single charge. And with support for over 200 games, you will likely need all that time.

It’s a hell of a controller. I happen to like the fact that it can be so versatile. It’s portable when you close it down, but comfortable to hold when expanded. It’s definitely a good investment for the serious gamer. Swiping and tapping can only take you so far.

Buy the Phonejoy GamePad 2 for $59.99

24
Dec

HTC One X9 officially announced in China


htc one x9 official

The HTC One X9 has been officially announced in China. Powered by an octa-core MediaTek processor, the One X9 is a premium smartphone that doesn’t command a premium price tag. Equipped with a 5.5-inch display, the One X9 features a good-looking design that’s been combined with a metal unibody. HTC claims that it takes more than 300 hours and 50 advanced steps to assemble one of these beauties.

On the inside of the One X9 ticks MediaTek’s high-end Helio X10 processor, which is comprised of 8x Cortex A53 cores clocked at 2.2GHz. The 64-bit chipset is paired with a PowerVR G6200 GPU clocked at 700MHz, 3GB of RAM, and 32GB of internal storage. The One X9 has an UltraPixel front camera, great for low-light conditions and selfie lovers. Turn the device around and you’re greeted by a 13MP camera that’s armed with OIS and capable of 4K video recording. There’s also support for RAW image capture, which serious mobile photographers are sure to appreciate.

The One X9 comes with a large 3000mAh battery, which HTC claims can last about 15 hours of voice calls over 3G, 10 hours of high-definition video playback, and 40 hours of uninterrupted music playback. Support for fast charging is present, which is said to be 30% faster than charging with a regular 5V, 1A charger.

htc one x9 image

Just like most other high-end HTC handsets, the One X9 has powerful BoomSound speakers on the front side, which when coupled with Dolby Audio makes for an immersive audio experience. Also, the speaker holes are such that they are effectively water- and dust-proof. The handset is capable of powering professional hi-fi headphones, thanks to the in-built amp that can drive power output of up to 0.98V.

The One X9 is HTC’s smallest 5.5-inch device ever, as specified on their website, having a width of only 75.9mm. The display, which boasts 170-degree wide viewing angles and high contrast for good daylight visibility, is protected by Corning’s Gorilla Glass. HTC opted for a Full HD (1920 x 1080 pixels) panel instead of Quad HD or 4K. The resultant improvement in battery life is sure to be appreciated by end users.

HTC’s website doesn’t mention the Android version running on the One X9, but seeing that the One A9 released with Marshmallow out-of-the-box, we would be surprised if it weren’t the same case with their new smartphone. Perhaps one of the best part about the One X9 is its price, which is 2399 yuan in China, or roughly $370. Keep in mind the phone is currently a Chinese exclusive, but let’s hope that HTC introduces the One X9 to other markets across the globe at the same aggressive price point.

24
Dec

HTC unveils the affordable but powerful One X9


We knew it was coming. Last week, HTC’s upcoming handset, the One X9, bared all in a leaked photo shoot. The Taiwanese manufacturer has now decided to let the cat out of the bag.

HTC-One-X9_official

The suspicions about the One X9 were on point. As of late, HTC has been focusing on strong midrange smartphones (see One A9) and the X9 lines up with that strategy. Let’s take a look at the specs:

  • Display: 5.5″ 1080P
  • SoC: MediaTek Helio X10 (octa-core, 2.2GHz) and 3GB of RAM
  • Storage: 32GB on-board and microSD expandable up to 2TB
  • Camera: 13MP rear (OIS, f/2.0 aperture) and 5MP front (f/2.0)
  • Battery: 3,000 mAh

htc-one-x9-camera

HTC doesn’t specify the display technology in the X9. The A9 uses an AMOLED panel, so we can make a guess. Additionally, we don’t know what version of Android the X9 will ship with, but Marshmallow supplemented with the latest HTC Sense UI would be a good guess.

The reversion back to capacitive navigation buttons is certainly interesting. HTC may feel like it’s a cleaner look than with the infamous black logo bar. Lastly, BoomSound makes a return. The X9 packs dual, front stereo speakers that are enhanced with Dolby Audio.

htc-one-x9-official-7-630x456

If you like what you see, it’s unfortunate that we have no idea if the One X9 will be offered worldwide. We only know that it’s slated for the Chinese market. The X9 will launch at 2,399 yuan (~ $370 USD), which is no doubt a great value.

Source: HTC

The post HTC unveils the affordable but powerful One X9 appeared first on AndroidGuys.

24
Dec

Toshiba Radius 12 review: A 4K laptop with compromises


Toshiba hasn’t always made the best laptops. The company is perhaps known for the sort of bargain-basement machines you’ll find at big-box stores like Best Buy, and when it has dabbled in flagship systems, its efforts have sometimes fallen short. The Radius 12 could be different, though. It ticks off almost all the right boxes, with a 4K, Technicolor-certified screen option and a 2.9-pound design — particularly impressive for a convertible like this with a 360-degree hinge. And though the entry-level $1,000 model makes do with a lower-res, lower-tech screen, even that configuration offers some impressive specs for the money. All good things, and yet, I can’t recommend it — not now, anyway.

Hardware

The Radius 12 is a halo product, but you wouldn’t necessarily know it at first glance, with the machine powered down. Though the lid is fashioned out of faintly brushed metal, the smooth, plasticky surfaces throughout make the device feel less than premium.

Then you pick it up. The machine is so light that it nearly excuses the drab design. (I say “nearly” because there are, in fact, machines like the 12-inch MacBook that weigh even less and manage to feel more luxurious in-hand.) And while it might not be much to look at, it’s well-built underneath its ho-hum surface; the screen doesn’t wobble when touched, and the palm rest doesn’t flex when you grip it between your fingers.

On a practical level, too, the chassis is home to a useful selection of ports, including a full-sized HDMI socket, two USB 3.0 connections, a smaller USB Type-C port, a full-sized SD card reader, a headphone jack and a volume rocker for when the device is in tablet mode. Compare that to the MacBook, which makes do with one measly USB Type-C connection, and doesn’t even come with a dongle in the box.

So far in our tour we haven’t yet powered on the Radius 12, but now would be a good time: The optional 4K display is likely the reason you’re considering buying this in the first place. The glass stretches virtually from edge to edge, with the skinniest of bezels acting as a nominal buffer between the display and the rest of the machine. I remain unconvinced that 3,840 x 2,160 resolution is necessary on a display this small — a slightly lower pixel count would still look sharp and would be less devastating on battery life, and there’s not yet much 4K content to watch anyway. Even so, there’s no question that the pixel density helps make the screen as gorgeous as it is.

Just as important, perhaps (or more so): The 4K version of the display (not the entry-level 1080p one) is Technicolor-certified, which means when you boot up the Radius 12 for the first time, you’ll be hit not just with super crisp images, but vibrant, saturated colors. It reminds me of how I felt years ago when I tested the first phones and tablets with Super AMOLED screens: The Radius 12’s panel is stunning in a way that most other laptops haven’t yet come close to matching. Fortunately, though, color-accurate screens are becoming more common, and perhaps one day we’ll even begin to take them for granted.

The audio doesn’t disappoint either. For the Radius 12, Toshiba went with Harman Kardon, which it only does on its highest-end machines; for everything else, it uses Skullcandy’s tech, which doesn’t sound as good. In this case, the sound comes out of a speaker on the backside of the hinge, which means you should get unobstructed sound regardless of the mode you happen to be using the laptop in. Aside from the fact that the speakers aren’t muffled on the bottom, the audio is balanced and the volume loud; I rarely had to pump it past the halfway mark when alone in my apartment.

Keyboard and trackpad

The Radius 12’s keyboard is more comfortable than it looks. With a flat profile, and a handful of undersized buttons, including the Caps Lock, Ctrl, Shift and arrow keys, it’d be easy to write off as poorly designed. Somehow, though, I enjoyed typing on it in spite of myself. In fact, this thousands-of-words-long review you’re reading was composed on the Radius 12. Even with the shrunken-down buttons, I rarely hit the wrong one when touch-typing, which isn’t always the case — the Lenovo Yoga 900 also has a few undersized keys, and the typing experience was at times so frustrating that I implored the company to reconsider the design on next year’s model.

I also found that although the Radius 12’s keyboard is flat, it feels sturdy; no matter how fast or vigorously I typed, the keys bounced right back. Whereas on other machines I might have to mash the buttons to make sure my presses register, that wasn’t a problem here. I appreciate too how relatively quiet it is. The backlighting came in handy as well, though that’s of course standard fare on notebooks in this price range.

If only I liked the touchpad as much. (What is it with this resurgence of bad laptop trackpads, by the way? I feel like I’ve hated every one I’ve tested in recent months.) The cursor doesn’t always go where I want, and I found myself accidentally rearranging my pinned browser tabs (ugh!) many, many times. Even single-finger tapping frequently went awry: I’d try to hit send on an email or select messages to delete, and my tap wouldn’t register. Two-finger scrolling can also be choppy.

It got to the point where I used my fingers to scroll when possible, and even used my finger where I really wasn’t meant to — things like the small “select” boxes in Gmail. Interfaces like that may have been designed primarily for a mouse, but ultimately, I found that my own digits were usually the more accurate input tool.

Performance and battery life

PCMark7 PCMark8 (Creative Accelerated) 3DMark11 3DMark (Sky Diver) ATTO (top reads/writes)
Toshiba Radius 12 (2.5GHz Intel Core i7-6500U, Intel HD 520) 5,458 3,684 E2,865 / P1,622 3,605 552 MB/s / 489 MB/s
HP Spectre x2 (1.2GHz Core M7-6Y75, Intel HD 515) 3,395 3,307

E1,884 / P1,148 / X331

2,737 554 MB/s / 281 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 (2.4GHz Core i5-6300U, Intel HD 520) 5,403 3,602

E2,697/ P1,556/ X422

3,614 1.6 GB/s / 529 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 900 (2.5GHz Core i7-6500U, Intel HD 520) 5,368 3,448

E2,707 / P1,581

3,161 556 MB/s / 511 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book (2.4GHz Core i5-6300U, Intel HD 520) 5,412 3,610

E2,758 / P1,578 / X429

3,623 1.6 GB/s / 571 MB/s
Microsoft Surface Book (2.6GHz Core i7-6600U, 1GB NVIDIA GeForce graphics) 5,740 3,850

E4,122 / P2,696

6,191 1.55 GB/s / 608 MB/s
HP Spectre x360 (2015, 2.2GHz Intel Core i5-5200U, Intel HD 5500) 4,965 N/A

E1,667 / P932 / X265

N/A 555 MB/s / 270 MB/s
Dell XPS 13 (2015, 2.2GHz Intel Core i5-5200U, Intel HD 5500) 4,900 N/A

E2,114 / P1,199 / X330

N/A 515 MB/s / 455 MB/s

It would be inaccurate to say that Toshiba didn’t cut corners — it clearly made some tradeoffs here — but when it comes to certain key specs, like display quality and internals, the company clearly wasn’t messing around. The configuration I tested (valued at $1,300) makes use of a 2.5GHz dual-core Core i7-6500U CPU, along with 8GB of RAM, integrated Intel HD 520 graphics and a 512GB solid-state drive.

And it’s just as fast as you’d expect it to be. The machine boots into the desktop in just eight seconds, while the SSD (made by Toshiba itself), reaches peak read speeds of 552 MB/s and top writes of 489 megabytes per second. While those read speeds are typical for a flagship laptop, the write rates are exceptional: Other machines can achieve little more than half those speeds. Need benchmarks? I’ve put some scores in the table above. As you can see, the Radius 12 delivers numbers that are just as good if not slightly better than similarly specced machines, like the Yoga 900.

Battery life

Toshiba Radius 12 5:12
Surface Book (Core i5, integrated graphics) 13:54 / 3:20 (tablet only)
MacBook Air (13-inch, 2013) 12:51
HP Spectre x360 11:34
Surface Book (Core i7, discrete graphics) 11:31 / 3:02 (tablet only)
Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, 2015) 11:23
iPad Pro 10:47
Chromebook Pixel (2015) 10:01
Lenovo Yoga 900 9:36
Microsoft Surface 3 9:11
Apple MacBook (2015) 7:47
Dell XPS 13 (2015) 7:36
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 7:15
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 7:08
HP Spectre x2 6:43

Toshiba rates the battery life at up to nine hours on the 1080p edition, and up to six and a half on the 4K model. Unfortunately, I only got to test the higher-res edition, which didn’t quite live up to its six-and-a-half hour claim, at least not in my tests. With video looping and fixed brightness, I got five hours and 12 minutes. That’s not surprising — it is a taxing test, after all — but even lowering the brightness to 50 percent from 65 didn’t help; the machine still managed just five hours and four minutes. As I read reviews written by my colleagues at other tech publications, I see they encountered short runtime as well. Not surprising, I guess: a bright, super-high-res panel will do that.

So that’s a shame. If you otherwise find the Radius 12 appealing, perhaps you’ll consider the 1080p version, with the idea that you’d be exchanging some pixels for longer battery life. I too would be interested to test the entry-level model. If I do, I’ll be sure to update this review with my findings.

Configuration options and the competition

As of this writing, the Radius 12 is available in two configurations on Toshiba’s website. The cheaper one is listed at $1,000 (after instant savings) with a Core i5 processor, 8GB of RAM, 1080p screen and a 256GB solid-state drive. The second option is the one I tested, currently retailing for $1,300 with a Core i7 CPU, 8GB of RAM, a larger 512GB SSD and, of course, that higher-res 4K display. Either way, the inclusion of 8GB of memory and 256GB of storage is notable, especially at this starting price.

Spec-wise, then, the Radius 12 isn’t a bad deal, while the keyboard, lightweight design and colorful screen also make it worth a closer look. That said, the battery life and finicky touchpad will be a dealbreaker for some, in which case there are several other worthy options waiting in the wings. The most obvious comparison is Apple’s 12-inch MacBook ($1,299 and up), which weighs just two pounds and features a 2,304-by-1,440, 226-pixel-per-inch screen. This too is a compromised machine. The battery life is significantly longer, offering nearly eight hours of video playback, but it comes at the expense of watered-down performance. Also, while the MacBook has a leg up in certain areas, like its easier-to-use touchpad, it’s a step back in other ways, like that shortage of ports I mentioned earlier.

If you were looking for a Windows machine, particularly one with a convertible design, the Radius 12 is notable for how thin and light it is (a 360-hinge and touchscreen do add heft, after all). That said, if you can stomach a slightly heavier design, you’ll be rewarded with much longer battery life. Case in point: HP’s 13.3-inch Spectre x360 ($900-plus) starts at a heavier 3.17 pounds, but lasted about 11 and a half hours in our tests (and that was with last-generation processors; I’m sure it does even better with Intel’s new sixth-gen Core CPUs). Throw in a comfortable keyboard, well-made design and bright screen, and it’s one of our favorite Windows notebooks of 2015.

Another convertible to consider is Lenovo’s Yoga 900 ($1,200 and up). At 2.8 pounds, it’s actually slightly lighter than the Radius 12, despite having a larger 13-inch screen. It also competes with the Radius 12 on specs, with the base model including the same Core i7 processor, 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage, plus a 3,200 x 1,800 display. The battery life is longer, though: about nine and a half hours in our tests. If I could change anything, I’d have Lenovo correct those undersized keys I alluded to earlier, and issue an update for the wonky touchpad. As with the Radius 12, where I have some similar concerns, it’s more an annoyance than a dealbreaker.

Lastly, there’s the Dell XPS 13 ($800-plus), my favorite Windows laptop of the year. The only reason I didn’t mention it sooner is that it has a fixed screen, which may come as a disappointment to people dead-set on a convertible 2-in-1 design. Fixed or no, though, it’s a very nice display: The glass extends nearly edge to edge, flanked by some very thin 5mm-thick bezels. That smart use of the screen real estate also means that the XPS 13 has a more compact footprint than other 13-inch laptops. Additionally, I like the build quality; I enjoy the comfortable keyboard and bright screen; and the performance is fast. Here, too, the touchpad can be a bit jumpy, and while the battery life is respectable, it’s not best in class. Those shortcomings aside, it deserves its high rating.

Wrap-up

I like the Toshiba Radius 12 more than I thought I would. When confronted with the poor battery life results early in my testing process, it was easy to assume that between that, the flat-looking keyboard, and Toshiba’s unimpressive track record in ultraportables, that the company had taken another wrong turn. In fact, the keyboard is more comfortable than photos would suggest, and while the runtime is indeed short, the Radius 12 can still lay claim to fast performance, a generous selection of ports and one stunning display.

With the battery life being as short as it is, it’s still impossible for me to give the Radius 12 my highest recommendation, or maybe even a strong recommendation at all. But Toshiba got enough things right that even if you choose not to buy the Radius 12 now, it’s still worth keeping an eye on. Perhaps as chip technology improves, Toshiba will be able to put out a machine that’s just as light, and just as fast, with just as nice a screen, but that can last longer on a charge. That would really be something.

24
Dec

Pre-order this vaporware hoverboard now for only $19,900


We don’t like that those small, self-balancing and oft-exploding scooter things have come to be called “hoverboards” any more than you do. After all, they don’t even hover. Today, though, ARCA Space Corporation claims to be the latest company to have developed something worthy of the name, though it’s not what Back to the Future promised us exactly. If Lexus’ version of the hoverboard was an exercise in physics (using quantum levitation on grand scale), then ARCA’s is an exercise in engineering, and elegant it is not. The ArcaBoard uses good, old-fashioned upthrust to float in mid-air, with 36 electic fans kicking out 272 horsepower. And one can (almost certainly not) be yours for the meagre pre-order price of $19,900.

You apparently steer this “revolutionary breakthrough for transportation” using your smartphone, though you can disable the stabilization system and use your body weight instead if you’re feeling particularly extreme. The ArcaBoard has a software-limited top speed of 12.5MPH, which you can enjoy for all of six minutes before the batteries run dry, or only three if you’re a heavier rider requiring the “Enhanced Thrust Version.” A full recharge takes six hours, but the optional $4,500 ArcaDock accessory will cut that down to just 35 minutes.

We could go on, regurgitating every bit of information ARCA’s website has to offer, but it’d probably be a waste of breath. The ArcaBoard has vaporware written all over it, and is most likely the worst kind of attention-grabbing PR stunt. The concept itself is pretty simple, of course: Enough upthrust plus many individual fans for stability equals hoverboard. Aside from the fact you’d be silly to spend almost 20 grand on a slab that can float for three to six minutes, the product and company are one enormous red flag.

First, there’s the timing of this announcement. Utter the word hoverboard on one of the slowest news days of the year and journalists will be falling over themselves to cover it. Then there’s all the accompanying marketing materials, which are suspiciously slick and full of cringe-inducing, inspirational accounts of the development process. Even the idea for the ArcaBoard itself began as the dream of a child, because of course it did. The glossy, to-good-to-be-true vibe is inescapable, leading us to bet the ArcaBoard won’t really begin shipping in April 2016 as the company has promised. And can you really move around on this thing as the company claims, because the footage appears to show a pretty unstable, wandering block of fans and batteries?

Lest we forget, what is ARCA Space Corporation anyway? Well, it used to be a non-governmental organization based in Romania, established in 1999 to develop rockets and other aerospace technology. Moving to Las Cruces, New Mexico last year, it adopted the name ARCA Space Corporation. The company’s currently developing rocket systems and serious, commercial drones (that seem to be behind schedule), but its history is a bit mysterious for our liking. In more than 15 years, it’s performed numerous tests of aerospace technology, but we can’t see that the outfit has ever really done, made or sold anything. Thus, we reckon it’s incredibly unlikely that the first commercial product ARCA Space Corporation will actually deliver is going to be an overpriced hoverboard no one wants.

Via: Las Cruces Sun-News

Source: ARCA Space Corporation

24
Dec

Leaked document reveals Firefox OS devices of the future


FireFox_OS_TA (2)

Mozilla has put an end to plans to produce smartphones running their Firefox OS, but some newly leaked documents reveal this is not the end of the line for the operating system. Depending on how aggressive Mozilla gets moving forward, it looks like the company envisions production of several Firefox OS powered devices including a tablet, a keyboard computer device, a streaming stick dongle, and a “hub” device.

The tablet, tentatively dubbed the Firefox Pad, appears to be a stripped down 10-inch tablet aimed at late adopters or others who may be hesitant to use new technology. The device is simple in that it will not come loaded with apps and no app store will be available. Mozilla will only supply their web browser, so users will just have access to web sites and and web-enabled apps they happen to run across while browsing.

The Firefox Pi is built on Raspberry Pi hardware as a “keyboard computer” that users can plug into a TV or a monitor if need be. The leaked documents note that India has “millions of obsolete analog TVs” so the device may make sense there. Another area where it might be welcome is in an education setting for technology students.

The Firefox Hub device is described as being patterned after Google’s OnHub device and provides a means to improve network security via the Firefox firewall. The device would also let users run their own web server hosting their own internal content.

Finally, the Firefox Stick is an HDMI connected dongle for televisions that runs the Firefox OS TV platform. This gives users the ability to stream content from the web to their television. According to the leaked documents, Firefox is also working with content producers to establish partnerships and ensure compliance with DRM requirements.

Mozilla states the leaked information is a “concept work by one of its developers” so it is unclear how close to reality any of these devices may be.

firefox_os_devices_leak

source: Gadgets 360

Come comment on this article: Leaked document reveals Firefox OS devices of the future