PMA vs WPC and the future of wireless charging

Two of the biggest players in the wireless charging industry are the Power Matters Alliance (PMA) and the Wireless Power Consortium (WPC), the latter of which owns well established Qi standard. Both are backed by a number of big names in the mobile industry and these two standards are supported in Samsung’s new Galaxy S6, a sure sign that market appears to be moving away from solely relying on Qi.

Furthermore, PMA and the Alliance for Wireless Power (A4WP), the third largest group in the space, signed a collaborative deal earlier in the year. The agreement sees the two companies exchange patents, technologies and systems in order to facilitate a faster evolution and adoption of wireless charging technology. While the PMA prefers inductive charging, which is similar to Qi, A4WP’s Rezence standard makes use of magnetic resonance charging. We’ve taken a look at the key technological differences before, so we’ll just quickly recap the major points.

The wireless charging industry is expected to reach revenue levels of $1.7 billion this year

Both the PMA and Qi are based on inductive charging, which operates over short distances, less than 1cm, and usually uses magnets to hold your phone in the right place.

Resonance charging, by comparison, operates over longer distances at the expense of less power as the distance increases, up to a couple of inches. This enables the technology to easily charge multiple devices at once. Each of these three standards delivers around 5W of power to your smartphone, which is roughly equivalent to using a 1 Amp wall charger. While slower than new Quick Charge technologies, this is still far faster than charging via computer USB connection.

The Qi standard also now supports resonance charging from a supported transmitter pad. Legacy devices are supported, but the technology was researched and implemented post the release of Qi, meaning that there are some subtle differences in between it and A4WP’s standard.

Samsung’s Galaxy S6 supports both Qi and PMA standards, but the charger it sells is still based on inductive technology.

A4WP communicates between your smartphone and charging pad using a Bluetooth Low Energy link, which controls power levels, identifies valid loads and is used to protect non-compliant devices from receiving power they can’t handle. This is especially useful when charging multiple devices, as power can be directed to empty devices and not wasted on ones which are full. Qi, on the other hand, uses backscatter modulation, using the transmitted power to also communicate a signal. This still allows for intelligent control over charging characteristics, but a single source cannot so readily receive signals from multiple devices at once. If you’re looking to charge low power wearables alongside a smartphone and tablet, clear communication and power management is important.

When it comes to home use, PMA/A4WP and Qi are both quite suitable, although charging multiple devices from a single mat or platform, at greater distances, sounds more promising. We’ll just have to wait for resonance based products to hit the market later this year.

While home users are probably just eager for a common standard to be applied to all their devices, commercial implementations are more likely to have the final say in deciding the main standard. You have probably heard about PWA’s deal to bring wireless charging to Starbucks and McDonalds, and Qi stations making their way into hotel chains. However, it’s hard not to feel that technologies suited to charging multiple devices at once have the best chance of succeeding in the business space.

This is where ideas like Energous’ WattUp, which is a member of the PMA, and Ossia Cota could come into their own. These technologies allow for charging at much greater distances, up to 30 feet, and can intelligently charge numerous devices at once. Although the power supplied to devices is lower than inductive and resonance charging methods. Larger WiFi-esque hubs, rather than docks or mats, are used to target compatible devices with pockets of energy composed of thousands of high frequency signals. The hub nature also opens these platforms up to smart power management, multi-device support and remote charging schedules. Although these two technologies are different, they could end up offering similar benefits to consumers and businesses.

Walking into a coffee shop or office and leaving your phone to charge up while still in your pocket is much more convenient than having to secure yourself a seat near one of the designated charging spaces. Much like the multi-hub approach being adopted for future LTE technologies, wireless power could end up topping up your mobile devices continuously from multiple hubs located in busy areas.

Technologies suited to charging multiple devices have the best chance of succeeding in the business space

Not to mention the cost aspect associated with embedding numerous single charging stations in a premises, rather than a single or couple of hubs that can charge multiple devices. Ideas like WattUp and Cota may require a larger up front cost for a single unit, but they scale up much more economically than inductive docking stations, when it comes to catering for a larger number of people.

Most consumers don’t want the hassle on installing fiddly accessories. The winner in the wireless power battle will likely be the company with the most convenient embedded solution.

In much the same was as free WiFi acts as an opportunity for businesses to put offers directly before consumers, companies connecting to consumers via Bluetooth to offer free charging in exchange for a little marketing is a viable business proposition. Something which PWA have been keen to promote, although some are concerned about businesses further tracking consumer habits. There’s also a huge potential market for this type of technology in medicine, the automotive industry, and as low power, wireless internet-of-things devices become more common.

The wireless charging industry is expected to reach revenue levels of $1.7 billion this year, with industry revenue anticipated to jump as high as $15 billion by 2024. However, there’s still no clear industry consensus on a universal standard and there are some interesting new technologies entering the field which could shake up the current leaders.

Android 5.1.1 builds spotted for the Nexus 9 and Nexus 7 2013

With Android 5.1 out for most GPE and Nexus devices, attentions have moved on to the next version of Android and it looks like Google is getting ready to deliver. While not as exciting as the idea of Android 5.2 or 6.0, it looks like Google is readying 5.1.1, at least for two devices so far.

The Nexus 9 doesn’t have 5.1 officially yet but it looks like Google has 5.1.1 testing on the tablet under build LMY47S. The WiFi Nexus 7 2013 is also testing a 5.1.1 build under LMY47W. The 5.1.1 build is present on Android.com so it will be interesting to see if this rolls out officially here soon. The builds are from Feb. 16, and we’re not sure if we’ll see a newer build officially drop.

We’ll keep you posted if and when they do.

source: Android Police

Come comment on this article: Android 5.1.1 builds spotted for the Nexus 9 and Nexus 7 2013

Frederick’s of Hollywood closes stores in shift to web-only sales

One of the big names in bedroom wear is closing all of it’s retail stores and moving forward on the web. Frederick’s of Hollywood announced this week that it plans to close all of it’s physical shops and transition to an online-only business. The name might be synonymous with lingerie and other intimates shopping for some, having been around for decades, but Frederick’s fell way behind the competition — like Victoria’s Secret and others. Moving from brick-and-mortar locations to just selling goods on the web is a move we’ve seen before, and it’s becoming increasingly more common. However, not being able to benefit from curious foot traffic means a massive shift in marketing, which some experts believe was Frederick’s problem in recent years.

[Image credit: Steve Rhodes/Flickr]

Filed under: Internet

Comments

Source: Los Angeles Times

Disney Research has a 3D printer that can sew bunnies for you

3D printing has resulted in solid solutions like cartilages, organ replicas and even tortoise shells. But Disney Research now has a printer that can create soft, bendable objects – think 3D printing stuffed toys. The mechanics of the printer are similar to conventional machines that use plastics or metals, except this one works with fabric to create flexible and functional objects. Most additive 3D printers are designed to deposit materials in a specific spot, but fabric requires an alternative technique that imitates sewing or layering.

The researchers came up with a two-step printing process suited to fabric. First, a laser beam cuts through a sheet to create 2D shapes. The process retains the fabric surrounding the designated shape so it’s easier for the sheets to sit on top of each other in the next step. Every laser-cut sheet is then layered and fused together with a heat sensitive adhesive that’s commonly used in sewing. When printing is complete, the excess fabric is peeled off to reveal the object. For now, the researchers printed a bright red bunny prototype that demonstrates the cuddly possibilities and also a touch sensor with conductive materials that could join the next generation of interactive devices.

[Image credit: Disney Research]

Comments

Source: Disney Research

Japanese maglev train breaks its own world speed record

The Central Japan Railway company reports that its magnetic levitation bullet train topped 366 miles per hour on Thursday during a test run along a length of test track in the Yamanashi prefecture. This was enough to break its own 12-year-old, 361 mph world record set back in 2003. The train reportedly carried 29 engineers during its run. Unfortunately, the record is only expected to last until next Tuesday when JR Central hopes to spur the magnetically-propelled commuter train past 372 mph (600 kph).

Also unfortunate is the fact that normal passengers will likely never be able to experience these exhilarating speeds — unless something goes horribly wrong. The rail company plans to limit the trains to a pokey 313 mph for regular service when they come online in 2027. But even at these speeds, commuters could make it from Tokyo to Nagoya in about 40 minutes (less than half the time today’s fastest bullet trains require). The company even has aspirations to export this technology to America — specifically as a high-speed rail line running between New York City and Washington DC.

Filed under: Transportation

Comments

Via: Wall Street Journal

Source: JR Central (Japanese)