You’ll soon be able to send texts on your Chromebook

Google could be following Apple’s lead with iMessage by linking Android Messages to Chrome OS. Evidence of a native texting client appears on a new commit in Chromium Gerrit although there are no specific details about how the integration will work. A separate commit describes pairing a Chromebook with an Android device that’s handled “in the browser process.” 

With Apple’s hardware, iMessage for iOS and Message for MacOS rely on Apple’s cloud to synchronize messages between the two. These clients can be associated with a phone number or an Apple ID. For instance, if the recipient has an iPhone and iPad, all messages are tied to the phone number even though they also appear on the iPad. If the recipient switches to an Android phone but still has the iPad, texting via iMessage and Message are tied to the recipient’s Apple ID address instead, and don’t show up on the Android phone. 

Meanwhile, Google is still pushing for a final messaging solution within Android. Typically, texting apps are at the discretion of the manufacturer, such as how Samsung’s lackluster in-house Messages app installed as the default SMS client on Galaxy smartphones. Android Messages isn’t exactly stellar either, but it’s the closest Google has come to an integrated iMessage alternative. Allo is feature-rich, relying on Google Assistant, but it’s not meant for SMS texting (currently on hold too). 

That said, the texting aspect of Android is still somewhat of a mess. Adding to Google’s pile is the Rich Communication Services platform, or simply Chat, that’s a new initiative aiming to replace SMS messaging. It will offer everything you use now, such as image inserts, group chats, read receipts, and so on, but promises a “richer” experience. This service will be provided by AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon possibly by the end of the year, and baked into Google’s Android Messages app. 

Google is also bringing Android Messages to the web. Evidence of the browser-based version appeared in Android Messages 2.9, showing that a browser could be used to pair a PC running the online client with Android Messages installed on a phone by scanning a QR code. Linking to your Google Account is also part of the pairing process. 

With Messages for Chrome OS, Google appears to be taking a Mac approach with a dedicated texting client. But given the platform’s web-centric roots, it will probably be no different than using the browser-based version, only you won’t need a browser to use the service. You’ll likely be provided with a QR code to pair the native web app with Android Messages on your smartphone.  

When Google’s native messaging client will actually appear in Chrome OS is unknown for now, but the company is supposedly inching toward a finalized web-based version as seen in Android Messages 3.2. Digging into the code shows that you’ll have the ability to temporarily disable notifications on your phone if you’re currently using the web-based client. In addition to Chrome, the platform will support Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Opera, and Safari. 

Editors’ Recommendations

• Google code offers hints that Android Messages is coming to a desktop near you
• How to send a text message from a computer
• Google wants to replace texting
• What is RCS messaging? Here’s all you need to know about SMS’ successor
• Android vs. iOS: Which smartphone platform is the best?

Google done weaponizing A.I., will still work with military and governments

CEO Sundar Pichai outlined Google’s principles and objectives for artificial intelligence applications on the corporate blog on Thursday, June 7.

Pichai’s public statement follows complaints and a letter signed by more than 4,000 Google employees. The employees wanted the company to stop working on Project Maven, which involved developing A.I. for military applications assessing video footage taken by autonomous drones. Google has since reportedly agreed not to renew the Project Maven contract.

Referring to the potential societal impact of A.I., Pichai wrote, “As a leader in A.I., we feel a deep responsibility to get this right. So today, we’re announcing seven principles to guide our work going forward. These are not theoretical concepts; they are concrete standards that will actively govern our research and product development and will impact our business decisions.”

Here are Google’s published objectives for A.I. applications, as written:

• Be social beneficial.
• Avoid creating or reinforcing unfair bias.
• Be built and tested for safety.
• Be accountable to people.
• Incorporate privacy design principles.
• Uphold high standards of scientific excellence.
• Be made available for uses that accord with these principles.

Aware that the above principles are subject to interpretation, Google also outlined A.I. applications the company will not pursue. Pichai’s statement disavowed Google’s pursuit of technologies that cause harm, cause or support injury to people, perform surveillance that violates accepted norms, or contravene international laws and human rights.

Clarifying the assessment of causing harm, the statement of principles reads, “Where there is a material risk of harm, we will proceed only where we believe that the benefits substantially outweigh the risks, and will incorporate appropriate safety constraints.”

Pichai also wrote that while Google will not develop A.I. for use with weapons, the company will work with governments and military on other applications, particularly those that “keep service members and civilians safe.” Specific beneficial applications for A.I. mentioned include cybersecurity, training, military recruitment, veteran’s healthcare, and search and rescue.

Acknowledging there are many opinions in the uses of artificial intelligence, Pichai pledged to “promote thoughtful leadership in this area, drawing on scientifically rigorous and multidisciplinary approaches.”

The A.I. principles blog post closed with a look back to Google’s 2004 Founders’ Letter, written by Larry Page and Sergey Brin on the occasion of the company’s initial public offering (IPO). Two principles stand out as guiding principles in the 2004 letter: “Making the world a better place” and “Don’t be evil.”

Under the heading “Don’t be evil,” Page and Brin wrote, “We believe strongly that in the long term, we will be better served — as shareholders and in all other ways — by a company that does good things for the world even if we forgo some short-term gains. This is an important aspect of our culture and is broadly shared within the company.”

The Open letter Google employees sent to Pichai in April asking that Google cancel its participation in Project Maven referenced the principles stated in the Founders’ Letter.

Editors’ Recommendations

• Google co-founder’s letter focuses on the dangers and promises of A.I.
• Google reportedly plans to end involvement with Project Maven
• Apple’s latest hire just might make Siri seriously smarter
• Does Project Maven’s use of Google’s A.I. tech violate ‘Don’t Be Evil’ credo?
• Can A.I. make self-driving cars a reality? Waymo reveals the future

MIT trained an A.I. using morbid Reddit captions, and it became a psychopath

MIT

Science fiction has given us many iconic malevolent A.I. characters. However, these are often figures like Terminator’s T-800 or Alien’s Ash who commit emotionless murder to pursue an end goal. Those which exhibit more unhinged paranoid behavior, like 2001: A Space Odyssey’s HAL 9000, frequently do so because of a fault in their programming, rather than through design.

That’s what makes MIT’s “Norman” project so intriguing. Named after Psycho’s Norman Bates, it’s a newly created artificial intelligence billed as the “world’s first psychopath A.I.” Shown randomly generated inkblot tests, it offers disturbing interpretations like “man shot dead in front of his screaming wife” or “man gets pulled into dough machine.” What caused it to have this terrible view of the world? Access to Reddit, of course.

Norman was trained on image captions from the infamous subreddit r/watchpeopledie, dedicated to documenting real instances of death. Due to ethical and technical concerns, as well as the graphic content of the videos contained in it, the A.I. was only given captions describing the pictures. However, since it has only observed horrifying image captions, it sees death in whichever subsequent picture it looks at. Think of it a bit like that saying about how, for someone with a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. Except that instead of nails, it sees people beaten to death with hammers.

MIT

If you’re wondering why on earth this would be close to a good idea, it’s because it’s meant to illustrate a problem concerning biased data sets. Essentially, the idea is that machine learning works by analyzing vast troves of data. Feed it biased data and you get algorithms that spit out the wrong responses — whether that be systemically racist results or, well, this kind of thing.

“Our group is currently releasing a new project to fight against machine learning-based bias and discrimination,” the researchers told Digital Trends.

In another possible future research direction, they are interested in expanding the inkblot aspect of the project to use data mining to see if there’s an explanation for why people see different things in inkblot tests. So far, they have collected more than 200,000 user responses. “We are hoping to analyze this data to see what kind of clusters these responses create,” they said. “For example, are there specific groups of people who respond to the inkblots quite differently than others?” (And are those people by any chance regular visitors of r/watchpeopledie, just like Norman?)

To be honest, we’re just relieved to hear that none of them are planning to apply any of Norman’s lessons to, say, making the next generation of Roomba more efficient. A murder-happy vacuum cleaner sounds like a really bad idea!

Apple’s USB-C MagSafe adapter will make you want to live the ‘dongle life’

iPopba/123RF

When Apple launched the MacBook, it decided to embrace the future by ditching all legacy ports — even the beloved MagSafe charging connector — in favor of adopting the lone USB Type-C port. As it turns out, Apple didn’t need to abandon the MagSafe port when it went all-in with USB Type-C.

A patent filing with the United States Patent Office from early 2016 reveals that Apple had been working on an adapter that would allow the company to still fully embrace the USB Type-C port while still delivering the benefits of a magnetic MagSafe connector. The MacBook — and by proxy, the MacBook Pro — would still ship with the standard USB Type-C port, but Apple’s patent filing with the shows that a magnetic adapter could be plugged into the USB Type-C port to deliver the functionality of a MagSafe connector.

“An illustrative embodiment of the present invention may provide a connector adapter having a connector insert and a magnetic connector receptacle,” Apple said of its innovation in its patent application. “The magnetic connector receptacle on the adapter may receive a corresponding magnetic connector insert that may be connected to a charger through a cable. The connector insert of the adapter may be inserted into a connector receptacle on an electronic device.”

The end that is inserted into the device could be fitted for micro USB, USB Type-C, or other types of port. The adapter itself could be constructed in a number of ways with various different materials. The non-conductive housing could be made from “silicon or silicone, rubber, hard rubber, plastic, nylon, elastomers, liquid-crystal polymers (LCPs), ceramics, or other nonconductive material or combination of materials” using “injection or other molding, 3-D printing, machining, or other manufacturing process,” Apple said, while the conductive portion would be made from metals.

Such a solution wouldn’t be as elegant as having a dedicated MagSafe charging port on the device, like on the MacBook Air and older MacBook Pro, but it would give users access to all their ports for connecting other peripherals and accessories when the laptop isn’t charging. The adapter works in a similar manner to Grffin’s magnetic adapter and USB Type-C cable, a third-party accessory that retails for $40, Forbes reported.

Apple’s MagSafe connector was well loved because it made charging effortless. When you need to recharge Apple’s older MacBook Pro, the magnets guide the cable to the port and snaps into place. However, the main draw with MagSafe is that if someone trips over your power cord, the magnets would unlatch and break away from your laptop. The alternative is that your expensive laptop would fly to the ground.

Given that Apple’s invention is for an adapter for the USB Type-C port, rather than a native solution that’s built into the company’s notebook, perhaps someday Apple would release this accessory as yet another dongle. A previous Apple patent revealed the company was working on stackable MagSafe accessories.

Editors’ Recommendations

• Apple’s first-generation MacBook is Amazon’s Deal of the Day
• Huawei sweetens the MateBook X Pro’s U.S. launch deal with gift card offer
• Incase’s ProConnected smart carry-on is a rolling power station for hungry devices
• What is USB OTG? Here’s how to use USB drives and more on your Galaxy S9
• The best USB-C cables to keep your gadgets powered

Best Waterproof Pouches for Android Phones

Brace your phone. Summer is coming.

Whether you’re heading somewhere awesome and wet for your vacation like the Bahamas, or you’re intending to bring your phone along as you go tubing on the Comal River, a waterproof pouch is an easy way to protect your phone from electronics’ biggest enemy: water.

IPX8 cases are widely prevalent, come in many styles, colors, and sizes to accommodate phones both big and small, and since they’re usually big enough for a driver’s license and some cash, they go from unitasker to waterproof purse. Whatever you’re looking for in a waterproof pouch, you can probably find it in one of these.

• Mpow
• CaliCase Floating Waterpoof Case
• JOTO
• FITFORT

A few notes before we get started:

• You can’t use a fingerprint scanner through a waterproof pouch. Be prepared to unlock your phone via password or PIN, or use Smart Lock to keep the device unlocked.
• You can use the buttons and for most newer model pouches you can interact with the touchscreen through the plastic, but you’ll probably want to open the camera app before you go underwater and you’ll definitely want to use the volume buttons as the shutter buttons to take photos.
• Most of these pouches are secured to a lanyard using a “Quick Release” mechanism. If someone yanks your pouch, the pouch will probably detach and the quick release mechanism can break. Be warned, be alert, and if you want some extra protection, swap it out for a beefier lanyard with a carabiner.
• Most of these pouches do not float on their own so that they don’t try to float away from you while you’re in the pool or snorkeling. If you want your pouch to float, consider getting a floating strap to use with your waterpoof pouch.

Mpow

There are a lot of cases out there to choose from, but Mpow’s cases are by far the most prevalent and some of the most popular. They usually come in packs of two to four, in different colors so the whole family can tell their phones apart, and work well enough to last an entire vacation. Now, this isn’t to say they’re infallible, but so long as you’re gentle when getting your phone in or out of it, they can be reusable. This pouch can fit phones with up to a 6-inch diagonal screen, though for phones on the larger end of that scale you may need to remove their case before you put them in.

Mpow ($11.99 for 3)

CaliCase Waterproof Floating Case

At $16 a pop, the CaliCase is one of the more expensive pouches here, but it also offers a few things over the competition. It’s double-layered, which means leaks have to get through two layers of plastic instead of one and should last longer for enthusiasts looking to not replace your waterproof pouch after two months of weekend kayaking. CaliCase also comes with a Lifetime Warranty.

CaliCase floats, which will work against you a little if you’re using it while snorkeling, but if you’re kayaking or tubing, your phone won’t sink to the bottom of the lake. It also secures via lockable carabiner to keep it strapped to your lanyard, kayak, or backpack. There are some color variants of the CaliCase that are Glow in the Dark, so can find it on a dark beach. There are also non-glowing colors, including an American flag design of the original CaliCase, but not in the Extra-Large version that fits the Google Pixel 2 XL.

Just keep in mind that the Clear CaliCase does not float, and that the colored versions of this case do not show the full back of the phone, but rather have a clear porthole for about the bottom third of the case for the camera.

CaliCase Extra-Large Waterproof Floating Case ($15.99 each)

JOTO

JOTO’s cases have over 20,000 reviews on Amazon and still have a 4.5-star rating. It is the #1 waterproof pouch on Amazon. Its pouches have been trusted and used by hundreds of thousands of users over the years, and while the pouches may not be made to last forever, JOTO will get you through your watery vacation so long as you’re gentle getting when you open and close the pouch when removing cash or taking out your phone to charge.

These pouches have colored borders, both sides of your phone are fully visible inside the case. The color options here aren’t quite as sexy as the Mpow or CaliCase, but they get the job done and offer enough colors to let everyone in the family have their own shade. The JOTO pouch can fit phones with up to a 6-inch diagonal screen, though for phones on the larger end of that scale, you may need to remove their case before you put them in.

JOTO ($8-$10 each)

FITFORT

FITFORT offers a fluorescent ring around their pouches, making it easier to spot the colored versions when wearing them at beachside concerts or during an early morning kayak. In addition to the normal twist-to-lock seal, FITFORT also has a press-to-seal zipper between the top clip and the pouch, another barrier that water has to work through before reaching your phone. The 4-pack is for up to 5.5″ inch phones, will make it a little easier for smaller phones like a Pixel 2, but there’s also a 2-pack available of floating pouches that fit phones up to 6″ phones. The 4-pack features plastic clips attaching the pouches to lanyards while the 2-pack use Quick-Release lanyard clips.

FITFORT ($13.99 for 4)

FITFORT Floating Pouch ($10.99 for 2)

How do you stay dry?

Got a favorite waterproof pouch for your Android phone? Do you want a floater or a sinker? Do you prefer a bright color or is black fine so long as it keeps your phone dry? Let us know which one you use in the comments.

Play online with a full year of PlayStation Plus for just $50

It Only Does Everything.

Sony’s got 12 months of PlayStation Plus for just $49.99. A year of the service is normally $60, and discounts directly from Sony are pretty rare. This is part of Sony’s “Days of Play” event, so it will probably expire June 18 when the event does. You can read more about “Days of Play” here, including information about a limited edition PlayStation 4 Pro console. You might find this deal on Amazon eventually, too, although it’s currently $60 there.

If you’re already a PlayStation Plus member, you can extend your current subscription for $10 cheaper with this deal. If you’re new, then this will open you up to a whole new world with PlayStation. Not only will you be able to play games online with friends and strangers alike, you’ll also get access to exclusive PlayStation Plus discounts and free games that are released every month. The two free games for the PS4 this month include Trials Fusion and XCOM 2, which are both very fun.

See at PlayStation Store

Of course Facebook ‘shared’ data with phone makers — but only because you let it happen

It’s not surprising that data was ‘shared,’ but it’s surprising that people didn’t realize what was going on.

Fresh Facebook news broke on Tuesday that the company has built decade-long partnerships with a handful of phone makers and other technology companies to more deeply integrate Facebook services and data into phones and websites. The deals offered phone makers the opportunity to integrate Facebook services directly into the contacts, dialer and launcher apps, among others — and of course in exchange also provided the companies with deeper hooks into user profile information than the typical Facebook APIs would offer.

This was taken as yet another bombshell revelation of how Facebook has been playing fast and loose with customer data — but I didn’t see it that way at all, and wasn’t even surprised to hear that these deals were made or continue to operate.

Facebook has been baked into nearly every Android phone since 2010.

Anyone who’s been around Android even half as long as I have knows that Facebook is baked into just about every Android phone sold today. The integration ranges from pre-installed Facebook and Instagram apps up to system-installed non-removable Facebook app (which often updated itself outside of the Play Store) and deep integration into your contacts and dialer. This was far more common back around 2010 when the Facebook app was … bad, but is still an extremely common occurrence. Each phone did (and does) it slightly differently, so it’s no surprise that it took a unique partnership with each company to get Facebooks features and data integrated into the operating system the way each company wanted. Yes, that’s going to mean data is being shared to, and stored on, the phone — that’s how this works.

Remember when it was revealed that Facebook kept call logs and messages from Android phones? Yeah, it’s kind of like that. From the point of view of Facebook and the phone maker, deep Facebook integration into the phone is of value to consumers, and so that’s what they offered — even if it led to more-than-usual amounts of personal information being “given” (although the specifics are debatable) to these companies.

Each company had slightly different data access requirements for their system — that’s just how this works.

So why is anyone surprised that Facebook made individual deals with companies to integrate the service into phones and in return offer deep access to data? This was blatantly obvious for years with early Android phones. Perhaps what really trigged the outrage was that Huawei was listed as one of the smartphone manufacturer partners for this program (alongside other Chinese OEMs like Lenovo, Oppo and TCL), which is, of course, embattled with the U.S. government over national security concerns. Huawei, for its part, claims it never stored the data on servers and it remained on the device — but regardless, looking at this one company is a red herring; data being offered up to any company without your explicit consent isn’t a good look.

But given the way that we know Facebook operates, and particularly how it operated in the past, that people are shocked and appalled by this news is just hilarious. None of this is surprising in the least, nor should anyone have expected that Facebook would have proactively disclosed that these deals were made. This sort of data sharing and private API access is the type of thing you undoubtedly agree to in a lengthy terms of service page for both Facebook and the phone you’re using. Not to mention that this is the sort of partnership for data sharing many companies partake in regularly with pre-installed apps and services other than Facebook. Shouting about how Facebook needs to be held to some new standard is unrealistic and misguided.

No, the real way to fix this problem is to simply not install Facebook on your Android phone. And if your phone comes with Facebook pre-installed, as so many do, disable whatever portions you can and never sign into your Facebook account on that device. You just made that entire partnership between Facebook and the phone manufacturer useless.

Yes, Facebook could have been more forthcoming about what companies it had deep sharing arrangements with. (And we can’t overlook that the phone companies could’ve made a clear disclosure.) But Facebook can only share data with your phone system if you have the app installed and your account logged in. You are the last line of defense here — don’t think for a second that you can install an app like Facebook and have complete control over what it collects and where that information is shared within the system. That’s just not how things work right now, nor has it been for the past 10 years.

Allow me to quote myself from that article about Facebook keeping call logs:

You gave Facebook access to that information. Android’s shaky and overly broad permissions settings gave Facebook a massive helping hand to accomplish this, but you installed the app and you pushed the button to allow the permissions as part of the installation. Facebook didn’t “steal” anything or operate outside of the parameters set by the Android Market and Google Play, it just used them to their fullest extent.

The story, and who’s responsible for your information, hasn’t changed since then.

You can use the Pixelbook’s power button as a two-factor authentication key

The functionality is available now in the Developer Channel.

Being safe and secure online is critical these days, and one of the best ways to go about that is by using two-factor authentication. USB security keys are one of the safest ways to use 2FA, but if you’ve got a Pixelbook, you can mimic a USB key’s functionality with its power button.

As spotted by 9to5Google, there’s a new option within the Chrome OS Developer Channel that allows you to turn the Pixelbook’s power button into a physical U2F (Universal 2nd Factor) key.

Once you’re in the Developer Channel, you’ll want to enter u2f_flags g2f into a Chrome Shell (hold down Ctrl + Alt + T at the same time). After that, you’re good to go.

You can technically enter this command on any Chromebook, but the Pixelbook is the only one that appears to actually work. Furthermore, it’s worth noting that the Developer Channel in Chrome OS can often be buggy and unstable due to its experimental nature. As such, it’d be worth picking up a backup USB key anyways just in case something goes awry with your Pixelbook.

How to change your software channel on Chrome OS

Chromebooks

• The best Chromebooks
• Chromebooks in education: Everything you need to know
• Should you buy a Chromebook?
• Chromebook Buyers Guide
• Google Pixelbook review
• Join our Chromebook forums

Google Assistant vs. Cortana: Which is better for you?

Google Assistant and Cortana are both great at the basics of being a smart assistant, but there are some differences when it comes to platform and home automation support.

If you’re back and forth between Google’s and Microsoft’s ecosystems, one of the bigger sticking points can be the virtual assistant that each company offers. Yes, both will be able to tell you the weather, stock information, and help you navigate. But, the assistants differ when it comes to where they’re supported, and accessories you can use with them.

Here’s how Google Assistant and Cortana stack up.

Where are they supported?

Of course, it doesn’t matter what Google and Microsoft include with Assistant and Cortana if they aren’t available where you live. Google Assistant will be available in 52 countries by the end of 2018. Meanwhile, Cortana is available in 13 countries and seven languages. Do note that the capabilities of each assistant will vary from region to region and language to language.

What platforms are they supported on?

The next trick to finding out which assistant is best for you is finding out what platforms each is supported on. Cortana is available on Windows 10, Xbox, iOS and Android. Cortana is also built into the Harmon Kardon Invoke speaker. For even better integration, Android users can set Cortana as the default voice assistant.

Google Assistant is available on iOS, Android, Android TV, Android Auto, Wear OS watches, Smart Displays, connected headphones and speakers, and the Google Pixelbook, though there is evidence to suggest it will come to other Chromebooks in the future. There’s also evidence to suggest Google Assistant will be coming to the Xbox One.

More: Here’s every device with Google Assistant built-in

What can you do with each one?

Both assistants are great for the basics of answering questions, completing web searches, setting reminders and checking the weather. Both assistants also work will smart appliances, including building your own IFTTT recipes. Google Assistant does have an advantage in this field by working with a lot more brands than Cortana does.

More: Comprehensive list of Cortana commands on Windows 10

More: Every smart home device that works with Cortana

More: These products are services work with Google Assistant

More: Our favorite IFTTT recipes for Google Assistant

Which one is best?

Deciding which smart assistant is best for you comes down to the other services you use. If your main PC runs Windows, you use Microsoft services like OneNote and Office 365, and your Xbox is your main entertainment system, Cortana is going to be a better fit for you. Meanwhile, if you’re mostly using Google services — even if you have a Windows PC or Xbox — Google Assistant is going to be better for you.

If you’re completely neutral, Google Assistant will be the better choice because it’s supported by more home automation vendors, more smart speaker vendors, and is available in more countries.

What say you?

So which assistant do you think is a better match for you? Let us know down below!

Google Hardware

• Google Wifi review
• Google Home review
• Chromecast Ultra: all you need to know
• Which Chromecast should you buy?

Google Wifi: Google
Amazon
Google Home: Google
Best Buy
Chromecast Ultra: Google
Best Buy

Angela Ahrendts Announces New App Prototyping ‘Today at Apple’ Sessions Coming Later in June

Senior vice president of Apple Retail, Angela Ahrendts, today tweeted out an announcement for a new “Today at Apple” session focused on app prototyping for aspiring developers. News of the session arrives as Apple’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference comes to an end today, after first kicking off with a keynote in San Jose, California on Monday.

Ahrendts describes the new program as a way to help app makers get started with prototyping, which she describes as “one of the most important steps of the design process.” The session itself is based on a popular talk from WWDC, and events for the prototyping lessons will begin at Apple retail locations later in June.

We’re launching a new #TodayatApple session to help aspiring app makers get started with one of the most important steps of the design process — prototyping. The session is based on a popular #WWDC talk. Sessions start later this month https://t.co/NMAVfZrdT3

— Angela Ahrendts (@AngelaAhrendts) June 8, 2018

Ahrendts has spearheaded Today at Apple sessions since the program expanded globally in May 2017, after originally beginning at Apple’s flagship store in Union Square in San Francisco. Today at Apple offers free sessions to teach skills in photography, videography, music, coding, art, and design, all using Apple products like iPad and Mac.

You can find Today at Apple sessions near you by visiting the company’s website, although it appears to be too early for the new prototyping sessions to be listed.

Tags: Angela Ahrendts, Today at Apple
Discuss this article in our forums