What’s the best future for Samsung’s present situation?

Since the release of the very first Galaxy S device, Samsung has been – arguably – the proverbial face of Android. No other OEM can move as many units worldwide. In many ways, the Galaxy brand is Android, at least for the mainstream consumer.
Things are changing though, at least in countries like China and India, two of the largest markets in the world. Whereas the Korean-based conglomerate once held high court among the people’s purchases, the emergence of highly aggressive competition has significantly altered the landscape. Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo, OnePlus, ZTE, Lenovo, and various other Chinese companies are quickly becoming household names in their home market, and many have plans to expand their empire elsewhere or have already begun to do so. The Galaxy S5 certainly proved this point.
Samsung has found itself in a rather curious case as of late, for its products are being “attacked” from all angles. On the premium end, keen Chinese competition has seen the production of devices with specs on-par with the Galaxy S or Note series but at much lower price points, while Apple finally has a modern sized smartphone. The pressure is just as strong at the budget-friendly side of things, perhaps even more so.
The well-received Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge have bought Samsung some time, but one successful flagship won’t offer much protection against the larger forces at play.
Samsung today
The Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge have done very well in key markets. In others, there are some startling surprises, as well as those more anticipated. Regardless of whether the company can sell 70 million units or not, the response to the Galaxy S6 family has been very positive, even if damage control is in order. The lack of a removable battery and microSD card support notwithstanding, the glass and metal build has seen the S6 accepted as a truly premium device, comparable with the One series or the iPhone, complete with a top-notch display and camera.
It’s not just the Galaxy S6. The Galaxy A series has received good press as well for its all-metal build, another first for Samsung. While the A3 and the A5 are more mid-ranged affairs in terms of specs and price, the A7 is much closer to a genuine flagship. These three phones were once believed to be a progenitor for the Galaxy S6, though for reasons unknown (possibly related to production yield problems) glass was selected instead.
The Galaxy A7: one of Samsung’s growing number of products in 2015, despite claims of a “reduction”.
But it’s not all just sunshine and roses. While the more high-profile Galaxy devices are now made of metal, things aren’t all premium. The Galaxy E for example, while featuring a metal back, is a standard “old Samsung” type of product, as is the new Galaxy J. These products have low specs and are very much aimed at price conscious consumers, despite costing more than their Chinese competitors with equal-or-better internals. The same goes for the puzzling Galaxy Tab A series, which has a metal build yet truly sub-premium specs.
Having budget devices at budget pricing is a necessity if Samsung wants to compete with Chinese players and other brands that are dominating this space. The question is, just how long can Samsung play this game?
Samsung tomorrow
The Samsung of tomorrow will be a direct result of the decisions made today, and this is where a bold decision might be necessary to maintain prosperity. Alas questions about the path for progress are myriad.
Focus entirely on premium products
One possibility for the future of Samsung is to focus exclusively on high-end products. In a sense, there is just no point trying to pursue the low-end market. Smartphones have begun to exist as a commodity, and indeed, any generic company is now capable of putting out a random product with some decent specs. Add this to the fact that the various Chinese OEMs mentioned at the start of this piece are dominating several key Asian markets with their cut-throat price points.
Samsung would be wise to just stop playing this destructive game entirely. It will never be able to compete unless it severely reduces prices, thus negatively affecting the bottom line with diminished profits. Even if Samsung does cut prices, just how long can it resist the onslaught of smaller, more nimbler competitors with little to lose?
While the Galaxy S6 may have done a great deal to establish Samsung as a “premium” company with premium products, the low-end devices mentioned earlier almost completely lack prestige. When it comes to mid-to-low end products, Samsung is still the Samsung of old, and that isn’t going to help it one bit.
To offer up some support for such a surprising suggestion, look no further than this graphic showing the Chinese market share evolution over the past year:
Consider that Apple has done quite well by focusing exclusively on the high end market, and even its Apple Watch – despite reports of diminished sales predictions – can’t stymie the huge number of pre-orders received, for a smartwatch of all things. There are definitely people with money to burn, and if Samsung can be seen as a company with products on par with Apple, suddenly even the fruit might start shivering.
Produce the un-producible
Even the flattest foldable still needs a power source…
With respect to the focus on premium, Samsung has a lot of potential: the Edge display technology (curved AMOLED), the Galaxy S and Galaxy Note series, and whatever bendable, foldable, or flexible product it may seek to bring to market in the next year or so. It also has a lot of potential with its upcoming “Gear A,” the company’s first wearable to feature a circular display and with a unique interface that has presented itself in patent applications from earlier this year. In particular, the focus on making curved products will ensure that the company literally has no competition (save from LG), as currently there are no rivals that produce consumer electronics with such technology.
Even if Japan Display were to begin manufacturing such panels in the next few years (a large rival to be sure), there is seemingly no threat from Chinese OEMs and related component suppliers given the advanced nature of this kind of product. To illustrate this situation, look no further than the numerous Galaxy S6 clones, yet the lack of any Galaxy S6 Edge replicas. You can’t clone what you can’t make, and as such Samsung can definitely make a mainstay out of the proverbial impasse. The company has poured large amounts of financial resources into flexible technology, and it had best make the most of it to ensure its success.
Samsung has curved televisions already on sale, yet the price to purchase one is prohibitive.
One problem to consider, however, is that anything bendable or foldable is most certainly going to cost quite a pretty penny, as well as attract the inevitable ire of more conservative-minded consumers. That no one else can make a product like Project Valley might be is well-and-good, but if it retails for upwards of $1000 upon release, even high-end spenders might hesitate, less they be tech-heads. Add that to the fact that the first few products that make use of some new technology tend to have bugs or limitations involved: look no further than the original HDTVs and their high prices yet back-light burnout, or plasma TV burn-in. Suffice to say that Samsung’s gigantic curved 4K televisions are definitely high-end, yet they don’t seem to be flaying off the shelves.
Less is more
Realistically, Samsung’s capacity to simply “abandon” the budget market isn’t going to happen any time soon, at least not if investors and board members have anything to say about it: Despite the diminishing returns, something is still better than nothing, and thus even if the former top dog were to fall to the 10th rank spot in China or India, given their large populations, there is still a lot of money to be made.
A less dramatic solution then, might be to do away with the “one device for every and any possible need” mentality. Last year alone, Samsung released five tablet lines: Galaxy Tab PRO, Galaxy Note PRO, Galaxy Tab 4, Galaxy Tab S, and Galaxy Tab Active. Save for the Note PRO and Tab Active, the remaining lines each ranged from 4-6 different core variants (i.e. LTE or Wi-FI) when all available sizes were factored in. Is this really necessary? Perhaps nowhere could this be seen more questionable than the Tab PRO series, which was released only to be reduced to irrelevancy just a few months later when the superior Tab S line hit stores.
Samsung has pledged to streamline its future catalogs, yet there doesn’t seem to be any evidence of this. It’s now June, and the OEM has already released the: Galaxy A7, Galaxy S6, Galaxy S6 Edge, Galaxy E, Galaxy J, Samsung Z, with new rumors of even another flip phone for China now cropping up. We already know there will be a Galaxy S6 Active and a Galaxy Note 5 (presumably with a Note Edge 2) and of course inevitably more low-end devices as well. Do we really need a low-low end (J) and a standard low-end (E) product? Given the extremely low costs of making such products, there is still too much overlap, seemingly just to put as many devices in front of shoppers as possible.
Tout Tizen
Samsung’s bigger picture for Tizen.
The final main possibility is for Samsung to simply accept the inevitable: it will never regain the soaring heights it reached in the recent past simply because times have changed. Sony has been confronting this for the better part of the 21st century and less the Korean giant wants to fall into a similar pitfall, it needs to accept this and find a new strategy. There is a lot of logic to the desire to push Tizen as a major brand, and in that regard there is promise of a brighter future. Google, you see, is the real winner when it comes to AOSP Android: it doesn’t care who makes official builds of the OS (forked variants like the Kindle Fire not included) because it stands to benefit from the end result. Samsung, on the other hand, will end up being just another money making generator for Google, perhaps reversing the previous situation wherein Google, paradoxically, was largely the catalyst that ignited Samsung’s smartphones fortunes.
Whereas the original (unreleased) Samsung Z had decent specs, the Z1 is truly a budget product through-and-through.
If Tizen can be truly established as a major platform, Samsung can gradually shift its focus and slowly redirect its loyal customers to its in-house OS. In theory, there is no reason it couldn’t make a Galaxy S6 Tizen Edition similar to how HTC made an HTC One M8 for Windows Phone. If it cost less than the Google variant, yet still featured the same specs and hardware, it would be of immense interest to those who want the product but aren’t willing to spend for it. Likewise, the prevalence of a diverse range of Tizen devices would mean that its scope could be expanded beyond India and Bangladesh (the two countries where the Samsung Z1 is currently on sale) and the Gear smartwatch series.
Samsung, in theory, could become a company like Apple or Google, or Microsoft. In theory.
Wrap up
Samsung needs to do something, and soon, less it quickly runs the risk of parroting Sony’s serious situation.
Samsung is in a curious position, and one that could very well determine its fortunes over the next year. The budget market is becoming increasingly controlled by Chinese manufacturers, and unless Samsung can cut corners or pinch prices, there seems little possibility of it ever topping the sales charts again when it comes to the Galaxy series in countries like China or India.
One potential area of hope could be in truly budget friendly products like the Tizen-running Samsung Z1, which interestingly enough became the top selling phone in Bangladesh for Q1 2015. Still, as far as Android goes, we feel it might be time for the Korean conglomerate to finally accept the changing times and devote itself to making top-notch Android products with the best hardware, software, and support, or else truly slim down the pickings.
Any thoughts? Be sure to leave a comment below and let us know!
LG G4 vs Samsung Galaxy S6 / S6 Edge – Camera Shootout
The LG G4 and Samsung Galaxy S6/edge are currently some of the best Android phones you can get your hands on. Both handsets have received no shortage of compliments, and deservedly so. We’ve already pit the flagships from the two Korean giants against each other in a comprehensive comparison but, as promised, today we’re going to focus on one particular aspect that makes both these devices amazing: the camera experience.
#gallery-1
margin: auto;
#gallery-1 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-1 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-1 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
- Samsung Galaxy S6
- LG G4
Kicking things off with their respective self-portrait taking capabilities, looking at the image above and in the video, it’s obvious that the LG G4 does tend to overexpose some parts of these photos, and the field of view of the 8 MP front-facing shooter is somewhat narrow. The 5 MP front-facing unit of the Galaxy S6 does comes with a wider angle lens, and also benefits from a Wide Selfie Mode that allows you to use a panoramic motion in order to get more people into your shot. On the other hand, the LG G4 comes with a slew of gestures in order to make taking selfies a little more exciting, but the most useful of the lot is the ability to bring down the phone to a viewing angle that automatically lets you see the selfie you just took.
#gallery-2
margin: auto;
#gallery-2 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-2 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-2 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
- Galaxy S6
- LG G4
Moving onto the rear cameras, the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S6 Edge pack 16 MP rear shooter with a f/1.9 aperture and OIS, while the LG G4 also features a 16 MP unit with f/1.8 aperture and OIS+, as well as a laser guided auto-focus system and a color spectrum sensor that flank the camera.
#gallery-3
margin: auto;
#gallery-3 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-3 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-3 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
- Samsung Galaxy S6
- LG G4
In lower light situations, the G4 still ends up over exposing the shot a little too much, and when there is a prominent light source on the subject, it will tend to be more blown out. Testing these cameras out during a concert, with the band members on stage being under very bright lights, you can see that even with spot metering you’re not going to be able to get a very good shot in the basic mode. That is where the Pro Modes comes in.
#gallery-4
margin: auto;
#gallery-4 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-4 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-4 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
- Samsung Galaxy S6
- LG G4
The Pro Mode of the Galaxy S6 isn’t very robust, and there aren’t a whole lot of settings that you can manipulate, but you can bring the exposure compensation slider down, for example to -2, that does make for a somewhat better shot. The G4 did a better job with the exposure, despite the fact that, with the faster shutter speed that ISO had to compensate for, there ended up being a lot of grain in the shot. So in this situation, you’ll have to take your pick between a shot that is a little bit more overexposed with the Galaxy S6, or a better looking photo in terms of color and exposure with the LG G4 but with a lot more grain in the image.
As you may have noticed in the videos taken during the concert, taking a video makes the settings revert to what you get with the auto mode, and it is disappointing that the manual settings don’t have any effect on the video content.
#gallery-5
margin: auto;
#gallery-5 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-5 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-5 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
- Samsung Galaxy S6
- LG G4
Moving to the outdoors and other well-lit situations, both cameras do an excellent job, but unsurprisingly, the Galaxy S6 does tend to oversaturate the shots a little bit. In some instances, this means the availability of deeper blacks and more contrast, and the punch in the colors can get to be a little much, even if some people do prefer that. In the case of the LG G4, the color reproduction is a lot more accurate because of the color spectrum sensor.
#gallery-6
margin: auto;
#gallery-6 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-6 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-6 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
- Samsung Galaxy S6
- LG G4
There were a few rare instances where the G4 actually saturated the photo a little bit more than the Galaxy S6, as you can see in the second set of images above. The G4 also lets you cater the shot more to you liking with the more robust Manual Mode that it features, and of course, you also have the ability to shoot in the RAW format, and use the RAW capture photo in a program like Lightroom to make it look exactly the way you want it.
#gallery-7
margin: auto;
#gallery-7 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-7 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-7 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
- Samsung Galaxy S6
- LG G4
Apart from the image quality possible with both cameras, a mention has to be made with regards to the picture taking experience itself. Samsung introduced a new shortcut with the Galaxy S6 that allowed you to double tap the home button up front to bring up the camera app and start shooting right away. The LG G4 has its own shortcut as well, a double tap of the volume down button, but this isn’t just to launch the camera app, as it also ends up taking a photo. Now, if you haven’t already framed the scene correctly without the viewfinder, or if there is nothing to take at the time, the camera will still take a picture, and only then can you begin to cater your shot, making the G4 just a little bit slower in going from the prone position to actually being able to take photos.
#gallery-8
margin: auto;
#gallery-8 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-8 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-8 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
- Samsung Galaxy S6
- LG G4
Testing the optical image stabilization available with either device, you can see in the video above that the larger sensor of the G4 and the enhanced OIS does a great job in keeping things stable, while the resulting video with the Galaxy S6 is not as steady in comparison, and is a really big feather in the cap of the LG G4.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Camera Samples
While the Galaxy S6 tends to oversaturate, and the LG G4 has a penchant for overexposure, when it comes to capturing detail, both of these devices do a fantastic job. It’s only when you really zoom in to the photos that some disparities might come up, but is nothing significantly noticeable. You may see that the post processing that goes on results in a slight loss of sharpness in the case of the LG G4, but is something that is noticeable only when really zooming in to the shot.
LG G4 Camera Samples
So there you have it for this in-depth look at the LG G4 vs Samsung Galaxy S6 / S6 Edge camera! As you may have noticed throughout the video, the Galaxy S6 does tend feature very punchy colors, but the color reproduction with the LG G4 is far from bland, and the shots still look really nice. Bottom-line, users will likely be happy regardless of which smartphone camera they end up choosing. It cannot be emphasized enough how great both of these cameras are, and we’ve come to a point in the Android world where the smartphone tech is getting more than good enough to replace regular point and shoot cameras. This is a wonderful thing to happen, and it will only continue to get better over the course of this year and beyond.
Galaxy S6 memory leak reportedly fixed

One of the biggest issues in Android Lollipop – which we’ve discussed on our Friday Debate Podcast several times – is the RAM management issue, otherwise known as the memory leak. The issue affects all Lollipop devices – albeit with varying effects on different devices – and on the Galaxy S6, it’s one of the biggest issues plaguing the handset.
However, S6 owners who have rooted their handsets may be able to fix the issues, with a post on XDA-Developer reportedly showing you how to fix the issue by tweaking your build.prop settings. Here’s how to fix your S6 RAM issues (all instructions courtesy of XDA-Developers):
setTimeout(function()
brightcove.createExperiences();
,
3000);
In your build.prop under #DHA Properties change these two lines:
ro.config.dha_cached_max=12
ro.config.dha_empty_max=36
Add these 4 lines:
ro.config.dha_th_rate=2.3
ro.config.dha_lmk_scale=0.545
ro.config.sdha_apps_bg_max=70
ro.config.sdha_apps_bg_min=8
Scroll down beyond the DHA properties where the other properties are stored and remove duplicate entires of
ro.config.dha_cached_max=
ro.config.dha_empty_max=
ro.config.dha_th_rate=
ro.config.dha_lmk_scale=
Finally this one will change your LMK values:
ro.config.oomminfree_high=7628,9768,11909,14515,16655,20469
As with all fixes like this, you’ll need root access and we’d certainly not recommend doing this if you are not comfortable with the risks, which include potentially bricking your handset and leaving you without a working device.
S6 vs the rest
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
According to the comments on the XDA thread, the build.prop fix results in massive memory improvements but when using apps like Chrome or apps calling webpages via Webview (or Tinfoil for Facebook), the memory management is still really bad. This is kernel related meaning it requires flashing a kernel to your handset but again, only do this if you are really comfortable with the steps involved.
S6 in video:
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
The Galaxy S6 might be the best handset this year but like all Lollipop devices, the memory leak issue is a concern. On the Galaxy S6 and the S6 Edge, the optimised software – which includes a lack of bloatware – offers one of the fastest experiences on the market and fixing the build.prop reportedly makes it much faster as well. For those who don’t want to edit the build.prop, the memory leak issue is expected to be included in the Android 5.1 Lollipop update, which will bring a range of new features as well.
People upgrading to a Samsung Galaxy S6 are mostly coming from other Samsung devices (55%) or Apple (40%)
style=”display:block”
data-ad-client=”ca-pub-8150504804865896″
data-ad-slot=”8461248232″
data-ad-format=”auto”>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();
Not long ago, we took a look at HTC One M8 not really wanting to update to the HTC One M9 (for various reasons). Thanks to the hard work of mobile trade-in sites CompareMyMobile UK and GadgetValuer USA, we now also have statistics for the Samsung Galaxy S6 and what devices its customers are coming from. After surveying customers from April 10th, the survey has found that 18.5% of them upgraded to a Samsung Galaxy S6 – not a bad percentage seeing as how many other devices there are out there.
Of that 18.5%, CompareMyMobile and GadgetValuer say that 55.17% of those converting to a Galaxy S6 have elected to do so after owning another Samsung device, and a whopping 40.69% of them were coming from an Apple device. This is especially surprising seeing as last year, Sony and Nokia converters to the Galaxy S5 made up about 25% of trade-ins, whereas anyone not called Samsung or Apple has made up less than 5% of this year’s trade-ins to a Galaxy S6.
If you’re wondering which devices were the actual top trade-ins for the Galaxy S6, they were:
- Samsung Galaxy S4
- Apple iPhone 5
- Samsung Galaxy S5
- Apple iPhone 5C
- Apple iPhone 5S
The Galaxy S4 topping the list is no surprise at all, but I’m genuinely surprised that so many iPhone users are making the jump to the Galaxy S6 – guess Samsung’s strategy is paying off after all.
What do you think about this data about people upgrading to a Samsung Galaxy S6? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Source: CompareMyMobile, GadgetValuer
The post People upgrading to a Samsung Galaxy S6 are mostly coming from other Samsung devices (55%) or Apple (40%) appeared first on AndroidSPIN.
Does your smartphone need to be rugged?

After many rumours and leaks, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active was finally announced today! The update brings most of the specs of the Galaxy S6, with the addition of dust and water resistance and a few other minor changes.
Samsung first experimented with ruggedness in the Galaxy S4 Active – and the experiment failed – before adding it to their flagship in the Galaxy S5 (although they did release the Galaxy S5 Active at a later date). Fast forward to the Galaxy S6 and Samsung dropped the feature again. Clearly the Galaxy S6 Active is designed to offer the rugged features some may be looking for in a flagship, but is dust and water resistance important to you?
Pros of dust and water resistance
The biggest advantage to ruggedness is that it protects against everyday incidents such as water damage from rain – which can void your warranty incidentally – or dust particles affecting performance if you live in an area like the Middle East, where sandstorms are common. While some phones are water resistant and can be used in a shower or while swimming, snorkelling or diving, others are only splash proof and can’t be submerged underwater.
setTimeout(function()
brightcove.createExperiences();
,
3000);
An example of this is the Sony Xperia Z3, which can be placed up to 1.5 metres underwater for up to an hour while the Apple Watch – which is only splash resistant – can’t even be worn in the shower.
The other benefit to adding ruggedness is the extra thickness provided by the protection means there’s often room for OEMs to add a larger battery or additional features that wouldn’t have been possible in other handsets due to a lack of available space.
setTimeout(function()
brightcove.createExperiences();
,
3000);
As an example, the Galaxy S6 features a 2550 mAh battery and is 6.8mm thick but the Galaxy S6 Active has a much-larger 3500 mAh battery, despite being just 0.1mm thicker. It also has a quick action button on the left hand side, allowing you to launch apps like the flashlight, compass or other apps from the phone’s “Activity Zone”.
Sure the S6 Active does drop a few other features (see below) but the battery benefits are certainly tempting, especially given the average Galaxy S6 battery performance. That’s a couple of the benefits but there’s also a couple of disadvantages to consider.
Cons of dust and water resistance

The biggest disadvantage of adding ruggedness is that it has a marked effect on the design of your smartphone. Looking at the Galaxy S6 and the Galaxy S6 Active side-by-side, the metal and glass design from the S6 is replaced by a new Active body that’s available in colors like Camouflage Blue and Gray. The impressive metal and glass design is one of the key selling points of the Galaxy S6 and – without actually trying the Galaxy S6 Active in hand – it’s difficult to see whether the Galaxy S6 Active offers this same premium experience.
The decision around design is related mostly to Samsung as Sony’s Xperia devices offer advanced ruggedness with the same omnibalance glass and plastic design that the company has always used. It’s more than likely that once Samsung produces a few Active smartphones, the design of its rugged smartphones will improve somewhat.
setTimeout(function()
brightcove.createExperiences();
,
3000);
Another disadvantage is that certain features – such as a fingerprint sensor, microSD card expansion slot or removable battery – are also left out as they won’t work well in water. The fingerprint sensor in the Galaxy S6 is built into the home button and with the bottom row being replaced by active buttons, the fingerprint sensor has also disappeared. The expandable storage and removable battery are certainly no surprise but could be a drawback if these features are important to you.
Poll: Is dust and water resistance important to you?

When the Galaxy S4 Active came out, we saw Samsung go head to head with Sony in the rugged market and it looked like dust and water resistance would become a key feature in smartphones going forward. However, fast forward a couple of years and the demand for rugged features has somewhat fizzled out.
In the past two years – Sony devices aside – there have only been a couple of rugged smartphones announced and rival OEMs including LG, HTC and Huawei have shown no interest in offering rugged smartphones. Some rugged devices come at a premium to non-rugged competition and a perceived lack of trust in the feature may be a couple of reasons that rugged devices aren’t the big seller that many expected. But is it important to you?
Rugged devices in video:
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
There are certainly positives and negatives to rugged devices but do you need a rugged device? If you found the perfect phone but found it didn’t offer rugged features, would that put you off? Let us know your views in the comments and by voting in our poll below.
// <![CDATA[
(function () document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(opst); ());
// ]]>
LG G4 vs Samsung Galaxy S6 / S6 Edge
setTimeout(function()
brightcove.createExperiences();
,
3000);
The first half of the 2015 flagship season brought high-end releases from all the major players in the Android world, and, while many of the upgrades were iterative, these latest offerings are all compelling in their own way. LG and Samsung had very different approaches this time around — the former maintained their winning formula, while the latter attempted to rethink the game altogether.
How do the current flagships from the two Korean giants fare against each other? We find out, as we take a closer look at the LG G4 vs Samsung Galaxy S6/Edge!
Design

Looking at the two phones, it’s obvious that while LG stuck to their guns, only adding new tricks to their existing formula, Samsung took things in a pretty different direction from before.
The Samsung flagships are no longer made of plastic, a much-needed change for a lot of users who weren’t happy with the existing standard, but the move was unfortunately not without sacrifices. Previously staple features like the replaceable battery and microSD card expansion were omitted in favor of the metal and glass unibody design, and that’s still a point of contention among Samsung fans. While the regular Galaxy S6 retains the flat design of its predecessors, in the case of its Edge counterpart, Samsung went all in with the curved display, putting edges on both sides of the display. This turns out to be a great choice in terms of handling, as the screen coming down to meet the palm makes for an accessible device. A prominent metal lip plays a role here of course, so that the screen isn’t all you are touching on the sides.

Despite the significant departure from the norm, there’s no mistaking either the Galaxy S6 or the S6 Edge as anything other than a Samsung device, with both devices retaining key signature elements, with classic layout of a physical home button flanked by Back and Recent Apps keys still found up front, along with the power button and volume rocker found on their usual sides, to the right and left respectively. Finally, colors are translucent behind the glass, giving every version of the device a very glossy look. It’s definitely a new direction for the Samsung Galaxy S line, and one that we’re actually quite pleased about, with the device now offering the premium look and feel expected from a high-end flagship, even if that means giving up some features.

On the other hand is the LG G4, with a design language that is very similar to LG releases of the past year. Despite being the larger of the two flagships, a few key aspects do help with the overall handling experience. The button layout on the back falls squarely where index finger would rest, a signature LG element that remains a unique and functional take on the typical button placement. Curves are also a part of the LG G4, but to a lesser extent when compared to the LG G Flex 2. The curve on the front is subtle, but is far more pronounced on the back, which gives a comfortable feeling in the hand, and makes the device more durable compared to normal smartphones.

Of course, the main addition when it comes to the LG G4 is the new leather back covers, with numerous options available in a variety of colors and a few textures. If you have a problem with the source of the material though, plastic options are also available. What is more important, however, is that the back cover is removable, something that is rarely seen in high-end devices nowadays,which enables the inclusion of a removable battery and a microSD card slot.

Both devices leverage the curved display to a certain extent, with the Galaxy S6 Edge focusing on features, compared to the G4, that prioritizes durability. The Samsung flagships understandably offer more when it comes to the handling experience, mostly due their comparatively smaller sizes, and the drastic departure from the norm in terms of build quality and design are a welcome change. On the other hand, while the LG G4 does get style points for the leather backings, the device can otherwise be best described as a worthwhile update to previous editions of LG’s high-end models. If you’re looking for phones that have moved forward from past design iterations, these two have definitely made the right steps forward.
Display

Both Samsung and LG are well-known for their display prowess, and each company brings their pedigrees to these phones, with very specific, but different, focuses.
Starting with the S6, the Super AMOLED panel builds on Samsung’s years of improvements, boasting a Quad HD resolution despite being just 5.1-inch in size and that high saturation Samsung has been know for a long time. Very high pixel densities are found here, so all the elements on this screen are really sharp. What sets the Edge variant apart is the ability to use the two curves on the sides of the display for a handful of interesting features: the sides can show a ticker-like information stream, they can glow a certain color when your favorite contacts are calling, or they can stay on to function as a night clock. It’s still up for discussion how useful these features are, but that doesn’t take away from the fact that both the Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge are some of the finest smartphone displays around.

The LG G4 brings an update to one of the first Quad HD displays on the market, found on last year’s LG G3, and goes in a very different direction compared to Samsung’s screens. To ensure color accuracy, LG adhered to the DCI color standard, which is commonly used in the TV industry; the G4 supposedly hits 98% of that standard, rather than going way over it, as Samsung routinely does. This is achieved by enhancing the IPS panel into what is called a Quantum Display, giving LG’s typical panel a boost in color gamut and saturation. The G4’s 5.5-inch size is great for media consumption, and with the very high pixel density, text and other elements are very sharp as well.
The claims about color saturation might be a bit too specific for common users, but it’s not difficult to see that the Quantum Display definitely is significantly less saturated compared to the Super AMOLED screens on the S6 and S6 Edge. It comes down to whether sensory overload, for lack of a better term, is important to you or not, as we’ve found the Super AMOLED display to be just that little bit more pleasing than other displays. The LG G4 does bring more real estate with it though, which is great for media consumption and gaming, and it certainly manages to make up for the ground lost in the color department.
Performance

Again, the G4 and S6/Edge go in different directions when it comes to performance.
Samsung decided to move away from the Snapdragons of the world, instead using the Galaxy S6 as the global coming-out party for the Exynos 7420 processor, aided by 3 GB of RAM. What is most important here is how Samsung optimized the latest iteration of TouchWiz UI with their in-house processing package, making for a device that flies through the various elements of the user interface. You can see this in action when double pressing the home button to launch the camera incredibly fast. Gaming is an absolute breeze as well, as everything from 2D games to more processor-intensive ones like Dragon Quest VIII running smoothly and easily. Multi-tasking is smooth even when using features like Multi-Window or S Window, and the Recent Apps screen is just as fast as you’d expect from a current generation flagship.

LG, on the other hand, strengthened their relationship with Qualcomm, and adopted the Snapdragon 808 processor. Like Samsung, LG focused on optimization this time around, resulting in a fast version of the LG UI. Backed by the Adreno 418 GPU and 3 GB of RAM, the 808 may not sound like the best processor available, but it certainly feels like one. The LG UI continues to be quite saturated with features, but the optimization seems to have worked well to make this a very reliable and snappy daily driver. Multi-tasking is quite smooth, and LG’s own shortcut for launching the camera is fast as well, even if it doesn’t always work as expected. There were a few instances of stutter when playing games like Dragon Quest VIII, but it’s not clear if this is due to the processor or some other issue.
Performance issues are, for the most part, a non-issue with either of these devices, and you’d be hard pressed to call one that much faster than the other. Disparities that occur in situations like gaming are still minor, and they can probably be attributed to software, as the LG UX is certainly more bloated when compared to the more spartan iteration of TouchWiz. As daily drivers, you’re still getting the best that either of these companies can offer this year, and 2015 certainly feels like a bit of a renaissance in Android performance.
Hardware

Like with displays and design, there are significant differences in terms of the hardware features of the LG G4 and Samsung Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge, which hasn’t always been the case with previous generations.
LG decided to retain two key features that many people were disappointed to see removed from Samsung’s flagship phones. Out of these two features, expandable storage is probably the main point of contention, though the 32 GB base option that the Galaxy S6 comes with should be more than enough. (Of course, there are higher storage capacity options available as well, for those that are willing to shell out more.)

The battery is no longer removable on the Galaxy S6, so those who appreciated the convenience of swapping batteries on the go should look elsewhere. That said, the battery can offer a full day of use with moderate usage, but power users may need to keep additional charging options on hand. Wireless charging is built into the Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge, and the devices are compatible with the two major wireless charging standards, something you don’t see on other devices. There’s also support for fast charging, which should make it easier to cope with the average battery life of the S6.

Samsung does manage to pack something extra into their devices every time though, and on the S6 it’s a heart rate monitor and a fingerprint scanner. The heart rate sensor, found on the back next to the camera unit, work better this time around because of the change to a vertical orientation. The fingerprint scanner, embedded into the physical home button up front, allows for some convenient security, as you just have to press the button and hold it to unlock the device. That’s a far better implementation compared to what was on the S5.
There’s no fingerprint scanner or hear rate monitor on the LG G4, but you do get a removable battery and expandable storage. Knock Code returns to help with the security side of things, but it simply isn’t as easy as Samsung’s fingerprint reader. 32 GB of on-board storage is also standard, but the ability to use microSD cards is a big bonus, especially for those looking to take advantage of the RAW photo capture capabilities of the G4 camera. Finally, the LG G4 packs a 3,000 mAh unit that offers long battery life even for heavy users, but it’s still hard to get a second day of usage. While the option to carry around a spare battery is always available, there’s no fast charging and getting wireless charging requires buying a special cover fitted with the necessary coil.

Despite the lack of two hardware features plenty of users have taken for granted, the Galaxy S6 still brings something different to the table, with a couple of unique features. The LG G4, on the other hand, doesn’t stray from the standard, but it makes it up by including features that most other manufacturers are phasing out.
Camera

When it comes to the camera, LG is trying to one-up the f/1.9 aperture of the Samsung cameras by offering a f/1.8 aperture and a large sensor, which means more light can be captured from a scene, resulting in more accurate rendition. The fast laser-guided autofocus also returns, this time backed up by a color spectrum sensor, which analyzes the scene for proper white balance interpretation.

The one-upmanship continues with the manual mode: the G4 camera app provides everything from a histogram, to a full Kelvin white balance gamut, along with plenty of ISO stops and shutter speeds. The camera interface is pretty intuitive, and any seasoned photographer will feel at home in. That said, pretty much anyone can get some great photos with the fast and responsive simple mode, where you can snap a picture just by tapping on the subject.

The front-facing camera is another case of LG trying to get the edge, with its gesture-based shots bolstered by an 8 MP sensor, compared to the 5 MP sensor found on the front of the Samsung flagships. The picture quality is quite good with either though, and the wide-selfie feature of the Galaxy S6 is a little more useful than the gesture shot of the G4. It’s nice to be able to easily check the selfie you just took by simply bringing the phone down to a normal viewing angle though.

Coming to the Samsung camera, the f/1.9 aperture is still good for some nice depth-of-field shots, and doesn’t lose its footing to the G4 in that regard. The manual mode in the Samsung camera app isn’t nearly as robust though, and while some manual controls are available, they are certainly not in terms of minute adjustments. HDR can be kept on auto at all times, like in the G4, but this is also true for the front facing camera, which also comes with an f/1.9 aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S6 camera samples
A more in-depth camera shootout is coming, but we can say that these two cameras are high up on the list of best Android shooters. It looks like Samsung finally understood that post-processing can make or break an image, and in looking closer at the Galaxy S6 photos, the grain is largely left alone. These photos also get a bump up in saturation, making for some really vivid photos in almost any situation.
LG G4 camera samples
While the saturation isn’t quite as high for the LG G4, the device does a good job of interpreting proper white balance levels, resulting in pretty accurate photos most of the time. The f/1.8 aperture doesn’t make it that much better in low light situations, but we prefer it over Samsung in these cases. The LG G4 has a bit more post processing and noise reduction going on though, and that can result in smudgier images. That said, this can be countered by shooting in RAW format, allowing for post production work using programs like Lightroom, which is a great feature for the budding shutter bug.
As already mentioned, these are two of the best Android cameras we’ve used and either of these phones will be great companions to have in the pocket. The G4 might be a bit faster in its auto mode, but the Samsung pictures are just that bit more pleasing to the eyes with their punchy colors.
Software

When it comes to the software side of things, once heavily bloated operating systems finally get the optimizations needed to create speedy and reliable daily drivers.
In the case of the LG G4, some of the features that felt overwhelming on previous generations can still be found, but they are hidden in this iteration of the UX, based on Android 5.0 Lollipop. Certain features like Smart Bulletin still need to be turned off from the get go, and Smart Notice, despite its rather simple look, doesn’t prove particularly useful. The QSlide apps are tucked away from the Quick Settings menu, unless you really need them. Even the enhanced calendar application and the categorized gallery don’t really add up to big additions.

Certain elements that have been retained, such as Knock Code and the ability to customize the softkey layout, do add to the overall experience though, with features like Dual Window helping with multi-tasking. Ultimately, this is a typical LG take on Android, that manages to not be very harsh on the eyes. What is most important, though, is that even when jumping among recent apps, sliding menus to and fro, and scrolling between the various elements, the experience remains smooth and snappy, which is great, and a testament to LG’s optimization work with Qualcomm. The relationship with Google also shines through — Google Chrome is the default browser, and users get 100 GB of free Google Drive storage for two years.

On the other hand, Samsung not only optimized their OS for the Exynos processor, but also slimmed it down. Most tutorial screens that used to be particularly annoying are not to be found anymore, and certain software features can easily be hidden if you don’t need them. Multi-Window continues to be as useful as ever, but that cannot be said for the S Finder and S Window capabilities, so it’s great that the latter can be turned off. Samsung’s own applications have been updated as well, including S Health, which looks better and takes advantage of the heart rate monitor. The curved sides of the Galaxy S6 Edge house a few features as well, like a quick notification view, and information tickers for things like Twitter and news feeds. Their best usage though is still as a night clock, which displays a faint clock during user-defined hours.

At the end of the day, the main story here is that, while both the G4 and the S6 offer a lot of features, they are as quick and smooth as they need to be. Both companies have received a lot of flak for stutter and lag on previous iterations of TouchWiz and LG UX, but complaints are few and far between this time around, and that is a wonderful development.
Specs Comparison
| Samsung Galaxy S6 / S6 Edge | LG G4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.1-inch Quad HD Super AMOLED display 577 ppi |
5.5-inch Quad HD Curved Quantum display 534 ppi |
| Processor | 2.1 GHz octa-core Exynos 7420 processor Mali-T760 |
1.8 GHz 64-bit hexa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 processor Adreno 418 GPU |
| RAM | 3 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage | 32/64/128 GB not expandable |
32 GB, expandable up to 128 GB |
| Network | 4G / LTE / HSPA+ 21/42 Mbps | 4G / LTE / HSPA+ 21/42 Mbps |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth 4.1, NFC, A-GPS / Glonass, USB 2.0 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth Smart Ready (Apt-X) 4.1, NFC SlimPort, A-GPS / Glonass, USB 2.0 |
| Camera | Rear 16 MP with OIS. Front 5 MP wide angle lens |
Rear 16 MP with OIS+ Front 8 MP |
| Software | Android 5.0.2 Lollipop | Android 5.1 Lollipop |
| Battery | 2,600 mAh – S6 Edge 2,550 mAh – S6 |
3,000 mAh |
| Dimensions | 142.1 x 70.1 x 7 mm 132 grams – S6 Edge 143.4 x 70.5 x 6.8 mm 138 grams – S6 |
148.9 x 76.1 x 9.8 mm 155 grams |
Gallery
Pricing and final thoughts
The LG G4 and Samsung Galaxy S6/Edge will both come in at a premium price on-contract or unlocked, and will be available from all the network carriers in the US.

So there you have it, for this in-depth look at the LG G4 vs Samsung Galaxy S6/S6 Edge! If you want the best Android flagships available right now, both of these phones tick a lot of the right boxes.
Those who want a larger device will go for the LG G4 with its 5.5-inch screen, that provides the real estate needed for work and play. The Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge are still fun in their smaller size, but it is at the expense of expandable storage. For a unique looking device, the S6 Edge is clearly a head-turning device, but the leather back of the LG G4 gives it a real measure of style. Either camera will bring the kind of quality users will want for capturing the moment. As daily drivers, these are speedy Android phones that are less bogged down by gimmicks compared to previous generations.
Ultimately, your needs will dictate which one is better for you, but what’s great about these Korean powerhouses is that, where one doesn’t succeed, the other likely does.
Deal: Galaxy S6 is now just £485 in the UK

While many people probably buy Android smartphones on contract, some people prefer to buy their handset outright and if you’ve been waiting for a deal on the Galaxy S6 in the UK, you’re in luck; Amazon UK have dropped the price of the Galaxy S6 32GB to under £485 presumably for a limited amount of time, although we’ve not been able to confirm this yet.
setTimeout(function()
brightcove.createExperiences();
,
3000);
As spotted by Gavin, the deal is for the 32GB white Galaxy S6 UK variant SIM-free and unlocked for use on any network. Amazon has plenty of listings for the Galaxy S6 but on one listing (which is for a marketplace seller), the company is listed as another seller and is offering a brand-new handset at the reduced price of £484.99. By way of comparison, Samsung still sells the Galaxy S6 for £559 and a 13 percent saving is certainly a good deal for a brand new smartphone.
Galaxy S6 in video:
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
The Galaxy S6 is Samsung’s latest flagship smartphone and arguably its best flagship device ever. The handset comes with a 5.1-inch Quad HD Super AMOLED display offering a whopping 577 pixel per inch density and it’s powered by Samsung’s own octa-core Exynos 7420 processor that tops the benchmark charts along with 3GB RAM and 32GB storage; there’s also 64GB and 128GB options available and none are expandable.
On the back, it comes with an all-new 16MP camera equipped with Optical Image Stabilisation, 4K Ultra HD video recording and a 5MP front facing snapper that can shoot Quad HD video. Under the hood, its powered by a 2550 mAh battery that can’t be removed but has dual wireless charging built in and also onboard is a fingerprint scanner, heart rate monitor, revamped and optimised user interface. The best thing about the handset is the new metal and glass build that offers a premium experience that’s been lacking from past plastic Samsung flagships.
Interested in picking up this deal before it increases in price? Hit the big button below and be quick; while it’s not confirmed that it’s a limited-time deal, it’s almost certain to rise in price, especially as the handset only launched a couple of months ago!
AT&T teases imminent Galaxy S6 Active release

The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has been leaked enough times for us to know it’s certainly happening but we still don’t actually known the handset will launch. If AT&T’s tweet is anything to go by however, we should see the rugged version of the Galaxy S6 launched any day now.
Only one thing is missing from your workout. It’s almost time to activate your full power. pic.twitter.com/PzgOS6SATJ
— AT&T (@ATT) June 4, 2015
AT&T’s teaser has followed on from several leaks, including Samsung revealing all the details on its support website. Taken straight from that website, we know the Galaxy S6 Active will have the following specs:
- Display: 5.1 inch Super AMOLED Quad HD (2560 x 1440 pixels)
- CPU: Octa-core Exynos 7420 chipset (4 x 2.1GHz and 4 x 1.5GHz cores)
- Storage: 32GB with possible microSD card expansion
- Camera: 16MP rear camera, 4K video recording, Optical Image Stabilisation, 5MP front camera (Quad HD video)
- Connectivity: Bluetooth v4.1, dual-band Wi-Fi ac, GPS, NFC, Heart Rate Sensor, IR blaster
- Battery: 2550 mAh battery, presumably with both types of wireless charging built in
- OS: Android 5.0 Lollipop with latest TouchWiz UI
- Dimensions: 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches
- Weight: 138 grams
setTimeout(function()
brightcove.createExperiences();
,
3000);
Looking at the specs list, there’s very little difference between the Galaxy S6 Active and the Galaxy S6 but the key change isn’t listed here; the handset is expected to bring rugged features, hence the “Active” name. The other difference is that the Active drops the fingerprint sensor, which was presumably necessary as the S6 Active should be able to stay submerged in water for long periods of time.
While the Galaxy S6 bought a large range of features, it was missing anything resembling ruggedness and the Active will look to change this by adding a case that can take a beating. The rumours of a microSD card expansion slot will certainly be frustrating to anyone who has bought the Galaxy S6 or S6 Edge and needs expandable storage. The interesting thing about Samsung’s support site is that it suggests the Galaxy S6 Active will have the same weight and dimensions as the Galaxy S6. This does seem like an error however, as the Active is expected to be thicker and heavier to account for the rugged features, which will bring a high IP rating for dust and water resistance.
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
The Galaxy S6 Active certainly doesn’t have the style or design of the Galaxy S6 but the specs sheet suggests that finally, we have a rugged handset that doesn’t feature a reduced specs list. If you’re looking for a rugged handset, chances are you’ll end up with the Galaxy S6 Active as it will be, by far, the best specced rugged smartphone on the market.
Features of Android 5.1.1 for Galaxy S6 revealed in video of early build
SamMobile has obtained an early build of the Android 5.1.1 firmware for the Galaxy S6 and published a brief video showing the new features coming to the build.
The caveat is this is build is still early in the development process, and some things can change between now and its expected rollout later this month or in July.
The biggest changes are coming to the Galaxy S6’ camera app, which gains support for shooting pictures in RAW mode, as well as lower ISO values, and a more intuitive way to adjust the manually exposure when taking a picture. The latter feature is demonstrated in the video above; basically, going through exposure brackets is as simple as swiping a slider.
The Galaxy S6 will also gain support for guest users, according to an older report from SamMobile.
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
The video goes through some of the more subtle changes coming to the Galaxy S6’ user interface, which include a toggle for disabling the S Finder and Quick Connect buttons from the Quick Settings interface, a more visible shortcut to the Themes Store in the Themes menu, and an option to give the wallpaper a parallax effect.
Google launched Android 5.1 on March 9, bringing bug fixes and a handful of new features, including Device Protection, which keeps the device locked even when the phone is reset, support for HD voice, and better quick settings tiles.
5.5-inch Galaxy S6 Plus makes alleged appearance in MKBHD video

Rumors of a larger version of the Galaxy S6 Edge have been swirling for a while, but now we’ve got some resemblance of proof thanks to beloved YouTuber Marques Brownlee, a.k.a MKBHD.
First, let’s back up a little. SamMobile first reported about a month ago on a device known initially as Project Zen, and then as Project Zero 2. This Project Zero 2 device bears the SM-G928 code number and is reportedly a larger version of the Galaxy S6 Edge, featuring a 5.5-inch display. This device was initially rumored to launch during IFA, in September.
Earlier this week, Italian tech blog HDBlog claimed that Project Zero 2 would launch in the coming weeks under the Galaxy S6 Plus moniker. Given the rather vague nature of the report and the fact that there was no evidence supporting it, we decided to skip it.
Now Galaxy S6 Plus makes a surprise appearance at the end of a MKBHD video on the HTC One M9+.
Marques says he receives the images from an anonymous source, without offering any further details. With that said, the YouTuber seems certain that this is indeed the Galaxy S6 Plus.


Now MKBHD is highly trustworthy when it comes to reviews, but he’s not known as someone who breaks news and leaks unannounced products. And the images are very ambiguous – it’s hard to tell whether this is indeed a new, larger device, or just the Galaxy S6 Edge. The only different detail that we spotted is the chrome ring around the flash/HRM module, which is more rounded in the MKBHD image, compared to the squarish design of the Edge. But even that is hardly conclusive proof that we’re looking at a new device.
According to SamMobile, the Zero 2 will feature a ~5.5-inch display Quad HD dual-edge AMOLED screen and a Snapdragon 808 processor. That’s the same processor as in the LG G4, and a move from the homemade Exynos processor powering the Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge.
The question remains, why would Samsung want to release a new flagship in the size gap between the S series and the Note series? It’s possible that the Korean giant is trying to capitalize on the success of the S6 Edge (which, reports claim, is selling much better than Samsung has anticipated) by releasing a larger phone of the same design.
Again, there’s still zero conclusive evidence that the Galaxy S6 Plus is coming. But say it’s a real product, what are your thoughts on it?
























