Intel and Micron Unveil New Memory Class That’s 1,000 Times Faster Than Current Technology
Intel and Micron today announced 3D Xpoint, a new class of memory that the companies are calling a “major breakthrough in memory process technology.” 3D Xpoint (pronounced cross point) is said to be up to 1,000 times faster and more durable than the NAND Flash storage that’s currently used in mobile devices and solid state drives. It’s the first new memory chip to come to the market in 25 years.
Intel and Micron say that 3D Xpoint was built to create a non-volatile, high-performance high-capacity storage and memory solution that was also affordable. In addition to being faster than NAND Flash, it’s also 10 times denser than the DRAM chips used in computers, which means much more data can be stored closer to the processor and accessed quickly.
A smartphone equipped with 3D Xpoint technology would potentially see much faster performance than a smartphone using existing technology, and because a single die can store 128GB of data, more storage fits into a smaller and more energy efficient package. 3D Xpoint is also versatile — fast enough to replace DRAM and stable enough to be used for long term storage.

The innovative, transistor-less cross point architecture creates a three-dimensional checkerboard where memory cells sit at the intersection of word lines and bit lines, allowing the cells to be addressed individually. As a result, data can be written and read in small sizes, leading to faster and more efficient read/write processes.
Intel and Micron provide several use cases for 3D Xpoint technology, suggesting it will let retailers quickly detect fraud patterns in financial transactions and allow healthcare researchers to process and analyze larger data sets in real time. For consumers, 3D Xpoint will allow “faster interactive social media” and more immersive gaming experiences.
“One of the most significant hurdles in modern computing is the time it takes the processor to reach data on long-term storage,” said Mark Adams, president of Micron. “This new class of non-volatile memory is a revolutionary technology that allows for quick access to enormous data sets and enables entirely new applications.”
As a nascent technology, 3D Xpoint is designed to complement existing NAND Flash and DRAM options because it will likely be too expensive to serve as a standalone option at launch, but in the future, it has the potential to introduce dramatic performance improvements in mobile and desktop products.
According to Intel and Micron, 3D Xpoint samples will be available later this year to select customers, but mainstream use may be a ways off. It is not clear if Apple will adopt 3D Xpoint when it first becomes available, but the company does often aim to implement cutting edge technology in its devices for maximum speed and performance.
Moto X Style hands-on and first impressions
It’s been a great couple of days for Android smartphone fans around the world, with users getting their first look at the highly-anticipated OnePlus 2 yesterday, with its great feature set and impressive price point. Today, Motorola took the wraps off its latest high-end offering, that continues everything we loved about its predecessors – fantastic design and build quality, high-end specifications and features, optimized software experience, and lots of customization options. So today we’re going hands-on and giving you our first impressions on the Moto X Style!
Don’t miss: Moto X Style vs Play: what’s the difference?
Design

Motorola is not one for dramatic departures in the design department, and so, the Moto X Style retains a lot of the design language of its predecessors. In a lot of ways, this device looks like a slightly smaller version of the Motorola-manufactured Nexus 6, with a solid metal frame, and heavily curved back and sides, and identical placements at the center of the headphone jack and SIM slot, and microUSB port, at the top and bottom respectively. Things remain largely the same up front as well, with a slew of sensors to help with the Active Display and gesture features, and the 5 MP front-facing camera is also coupled with a flash this time around. The larger size may take some getting used to, but the 76% screen to body ratio will allow for a slightly better feel.

As always, customization is a key part of the Moto X experience, so users will be given the choice to change the color and material of the backing to suit their liking, and as rumored, there will also be a gold and white version. Material choices for the rear back plates include a coated silicon rubber in various colors, premium Horween leather, and natural wood. You also get to play around with the color of the metal frame and accent on the back, for a truly customized device, along with the ability to have a personal message engraved.

A new addition is the metal accent on the back that houses the rear camera, dual LED flash, and the Motorola logo, which is much more subtle and classy than the large, in-your-face, logo and dual flash ring around the camera seen with the Moto X 2014. Motorola has never strived for offering the thinnest and lightest devices around, and this current generation Moto X has a significant thickness and heft to it, which isn’t actually a bad thing though, and allows for a very substantial and comfortable feel in the hand.
Display

The display size has seen a bump up to 5.7-inches, with the resolution also going up to Quad HD, resulting in a pixel density of 515 ppi. The jump to Quad HD certainly brings the Moto X Style up to par with current generation flagships. This display is vivid and colors do pop, viewing angles and brightness are also as expected, and overall, media and gaming-centric users will certainly appreciate the additional real estate the device provide.
It also should be noted that Motorola opted for a TFT LCD display this time around, unlike the AMOLED displays found in the Nexus 6 and past Moto X devices. We’re not sure if the company’s Moto Display feature will drain battery life more than usual now that there’s a different panel, though we’ll definitely test this out in our full review.
Hardware

Under the hood, the Moto X Style packs a Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 processor, clocked at 1.8 GHz, and backed by the Adreno 418 GPU, and 3 GB of RAM. The Snapdragon 808 may feel like a step back, but as we have seen with the LG G4, it’s all about software optimization, which is something that Motorola is known for. As such, the performance is still as smooth as ever, and any differences between the 808 and the 810 aren’t easily evident in real world use, helped along by Motorola’s fluid and light software experience.

The Moto X Style comes with 16, 32, and 64 GB of on-board storage options, but with expandable storage available via microSD card, by up to 128 GB. While the device doesn’t come with the water resistance like what’s available with the new Moto G, there is a water repellant coating, which should help with splash protection when out in the rain. It won’t be a good idea to take the phone for a swim though. Also great is the availability of dual front-facing stereo speakers, which should allow for a quality audio experience. The Moto X Style will be available in an unlocked iteration in the US, and the great news is that the device comes with universal LTE banding, which means that the same device will work on every network in the US, like Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, and T-Mobile.

The other big story here is with regards to the battery, with the Moto X Style packing a massive 3,000 mAh cell, which should provide for some long-lasting battery life. With that said, battery life is something we can find out only during the full review treatment. The device does comes with “Turbo25” fast charging capabilities, which Motorola claims is the fastest implementation of this tech in the world, and so, if you do run out of battery, you’ll be up and running once again in no time.
Camera

On the camera front, the Moto X Style packs a 21 MP rear shooter with dual LED flash, similar to what was seen with the Motorola Droid Turbo, as well as a 5 MP front-facing shooter, which also comes with an LED flash. Images captured by the camera as shown in the presentation were certainly fantastic, and Motorola guarantees that this will be the best in-class camera. Of course, more thorough testing will be required, and we can’t wait to put this camera through its paces.
Related: Moto X Style’s camera is right behind the Galaxy S6 Edge, according to DxOMark
Software

As has Motorola has always done, the software is perfectly optimized to make for a smooth and fluid experience. While retaining a lot of Material Design elements of Android 5.1.1 Lollipop, Motorola’s extras are also available, such as gestures, and the Moto Display, hands free mode, and a lot more. Other than the few Motorola add-ons, things remain as close to stock Android as ever, and as always, keeping it simple certainly helps keep it fast. Motorola will also be releasing a Moto X Pure Edition in the US, which allows for the “Nexus experience” with Moto X Style hardware, and will be running stock Android 5.1.1 Lollipop, and will also be one of the first recipients of future software updates.
Specs
| Display | 5.7-inch display Quad HD resolution, 515 ppi |
| Processor | 1.8 GHz hexa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 processor Adreno 418 GPU |
| RAM | 3 GB |
| Storage | 16/32/64 GB expandable via microSD up to 128 GB |
| Camera | 21 MP rear camera with dual LED flash 5 MP front-facing camera with wide angle lens and front-facing flash |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi a/b/g/n/ac Universal LTE bands Bluetooth 4.1 NFC GPS+GLONASS |
| Battery | 3,000 mAh |
| Software | Android 5.1.1 Lollipop |
| Colors | Moto Maker Coated Silicon Rubber Horween leather and natural wood Metallic accents Engraving |
Gallery
Pricing and availability
It all comes down to price though, and the Moto X Style definitely impresses in this regard. Flagship specifications and features will be available to you at a price point around $200 to $300 cheaper than other current generation high-end smartphones, and we already know that the Moto X Pure will be priced starting at just $399, which is just fantastic.
Stay tuned with Android Authority as we continue to bring you more great coverage from today’s Motorola event, and of course, for the upcoming full review of the Moto X Style, Moto X Play, Moto G (3rd generation), and a lot more.
Windows 10 review: the best of Windows 7 and 8
The best thing about Windows 10 is that it’s simply Windows, through and through. It’s as if Microsoft realized that devaluing the desktop in Windows 8 was akin to sacrilege, and Windows 10 is its penance. At its core, it’s a union of the best qualities of Windows 7 and Windows 8 — the desktop features of the former with some of the touch-friendly aspects of the latter. It’s no wonder Microsoft is calling it an operating system that’s both fresh and familiar. It’s easy to use with a keyboard and mouse, but it’s even better with touchscreen computers. The Start menu is back! And new features like Microsoft’s Cortana virtual assistant and Edge browser breathe new life into Windows. Microsoft is framing the OS as “Windows as a Service,” meaning it’s never quite done and constantly evolving. Most importantly, Windows 10 proves that Microsoft’s dream of delivering a single OS that can work across computers, tablets and phones might actually come true.
![]()
I don’t blame Microsoft for trying to sacrifice some sacred cows with Windows 8. It’s hard to truly innovate when you’re tied to a decades-long history. And as far as operating systems go, Windows’ interface is one of the oldest, with a core design that goes all the way back to 1995. But the real mistake with Windows 8 was that it was built for touch computing at a time when most people were still dealing with keyboards and mice (or trackpads). Adding insult to injury, it made the experience of using Windows worse for people without touchscreens. Now that touch-enabled laptops and multi-function devices like the Surface are more commonplace, Windows 8’s touch innovations seem a lot more useful. But given the ill will that OS built up over the past three years, it also made sense for Microsoft to start fresh. (There’s still no clear reason why Microsoft skipped the “Windows 9″ name, but I like to think it was because it needed to distance itself from Windows 8 as much as possible.)
Getting started

Before we dive into the nitty-gritty of Windows 10, it’s worth exploring the upgrade experience. In short, it’s pretty painless! Gone are the days where we had to devote hours and enlist the help of Windows specialists just to upgrade to a new OS (or, in my case, be the one to get recruited). Microsoft has steadily made upgrading easier with Windows 7 and 8, but with Windows 10, the process is even smoother. If you’re a current Windows user, you just need to click the “Get Windows 10″ app in the system tray and click “Reserve Your Free Upgrade” to join the queue. If you don’t see that app, make sure you have all of the current Windows Updates. Microsoft is making Windows 10 available to its Insider testers first starting on July 29, so you might have to wait a bit before you can upgrade.
Most of us will just be upgrading right from within Windows, but you can also boot off an external hard drive or USB drive to get it going. The entire installation process takes anywhere from 20 to 40 minutes, depending on your setup, and it’s mostly hands-free.
Once your installation is complete, you’re prompted to add in some personalization details and log in with your Microsoft Account. On a modern computer with a solid-state hard drive, Windows 10 typically boots within 10 to 15 seconds, about the same as Windows 7 and 8. (If you don’t have an SSD yet, now is the time to make that upgrade!) The login screen will probably look no different to you. But if you’ve got a computer that supports Windows Hello — that is, one with a fingerprint sensor, eye scanner or infrared camera (like Intel’s RealSense 3D camera) — you can also log in almost instantly with biometric authentication. There aren’t many Windows Hello-capable devices out there right now — the few include the Dell Inspiron 15 5548, HP Envy 15t and Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 15 — but from the demos we’ve seen, it looks like a logical evolution from just typing in passwords. Like many aspects of Windows 10, expect the mere act of logging in to get more intriguing over time.
If you’ve used any previous version of Windows, you’ll be right at home with Windows 10. The desktop is once again front and center, rather than being shoved off to the side like it was in Windows 8. The Start menu replaces the blocky Start screen from Windows 8, which was one of the many reasons that kept users from upgrading. Even Windows 8’s modern apps got something new: They can actually be used in their own windows! Before, they were either full-screen or took up a vertical slice of your display.
After spending the past few years with Windows 8, using Windows 10 felt like being thrown back into the past — but in a good way. I never quite got used to the way the last OS treated keyboards and mice as an afterthought, and I’ve heard the same from plenty of other Windows power users. So you can imagine how satisfying it was to feel a return to Windows 7 levels of desktop productivity. For example, when you tap the Windows key on your keyboard, the Start menu pops up immediately. In Windows 8, it took a bit longer for the Start screen to appear. So now the simple task of hitting the Windows key and immediately typing to search for something — one of the things I do most often — feels significantly improved.
It wasn’t long until I was back in my familiar Windows groove, with a desktop filled with multiple applications, browser tabs and random windows, all in a sort of ordered chaos. Similarly, being able to use modern apps in traditional windows is transformative. I used to avoid those apps entirely in Windows 8 since they were really meant for full-screen use, and they always felt like a huge waste of space on my 24-inch monitor. Full-screen apps make sense for tablets, but not so much for laptops and desktops. Now that I can actually move and resize modern apps on a whim, they suddenly feel more useful.
Design wise, Microsoft stuck with the sharp corners and tile-like look it’s been using since the debut of the Zune HD and Windows Phone, but there’s also much more flair than Windows 7 and 8. The Start menu and settings menu (accessible by swiping in from the right side of the screen, or the notifications button in the system tray) feature a hint of transparency, while applications like the File Explorer are built out of clean lines and plenty of white space. The default dark theme felt a bit more mature than Windows 8, and you can also flip on an option that automatically pulls an accent color from your current desktop wallpaper. Overall, Windows 10 looks and feels modern yet welcoming, which is exactly the right balance Microsoft needs if it wants to appeal to everyone.
Start menu, we missed you

Like most of Windows 10, the Start menu’s return should appease longtime fans and newcomers who are more used to Windows 8. It features your most-used applications (something resurrected from several Windows versions ago), and you can click through to get to all of your applications. But the bulk of the Start menu is made up of Live Tiles, those blocky icons Microsoft can’t seem to get enough of. I didn’t care for them much on the Windows 8 Start screen, but on Windows 10 they’re more functional, especially since you don’t need to completely leave your desktop to see them. Both the Live Tiles and the Start menu itself are customizable, so you can make them as small or as big as you’d like. At its largest, the menu is practically indistinguishable from the Windows 8 Start screen, but don’t tell that to Windows 7 holdouts.
While it’s a bit more work to find applications in the Start menu, I’ve honestly given up on the whole hunting and pecking thing. You’re better off just hitting the Start button (or even better, the Windows key on your keyboard) and typing to bring up a specific program.
And what if you’re the rare Windows 8 user who actually liked that Start screen? You can just switch over to that instead. Really, though, I’d suggest giving the new Start menu a shot, as it’s far more useful than the Start screen in desktop mode.
Continuum makes Windows more than meets the eye

One of the best things about Windows 10 is its ability to transform itself from a touch-focused platform to traditional desktop platform easily. Microsoft calls that feature “Continuum,” because of the seamless transition between different work environments. It’s really meant for multi-function computers like the Surface, which can be both a tablet and laptop depending on which accessories are connected. But it could also be useful if you want to connect a keyboard and mouse to your Windows 10 tablet. The tablet mode simplifies the taskbar, makes every application full-screen and enables a Windows 8-style Start screen. Windows 10 can automatically switch interfaces when it detects your keyboard has been removed, or you can choose to make the swap manually from the settings menu.
Looking ahead, Continuum has the potential to completely change the way we compute. In early demos, Microsoft showed off how a Windows 10 phone can be plugged into an external monitor — either wirelessly or with an HDMI dongle — and display a desktop-like interface. That could be a fun way to distract kids with videos when you’re on vacation, but in the future when our phones get even more powerful, it could have an even bigger impact. It could mean the end of lugging around laptops for some people.
While testing Windows 10 on a Surface Pro 3 over the past few months — first with the preview builds and finally with the complete release — I grew to appreciate Continuum as I moved between typical work tasks and more fun things, like reading digital comics with Comixology. It’s certainly better than how Windows 8 handled the difference between tablets and traditional computers.
Cortana brings virtual assistants to the desktop

Okay, virtual assistants are nothing new these days, but Cortana brings plenty of notable features to Windows 10. While setting it up, you can choose to have Cortana always listen for your commands (enabled by saying “Hey Cortana!”). You can ask her about basic things like the current weather or what’s on your schedule, or you could have her search the web using Bing. Cortana can answer some queries without even launching a web browser (you wouldn’t believe how old Tom Cruise really is). If you’re not a fan of voice commands, you can also type in queries into the Cortana search box on the taskbar, and you can choose to have her only activate voice commands when you hit a button.
If you’re worried about having Cortana always listening for your commands, perhaps over latent fears about AI taking over the world, I’d suggest getting over it. Cortana’s true strength, much like Alex on Amazon’s Echo, is her ability to handle voice commands at any moment. If you’re in the middle of a work document, for example, you can tell Cortana to set a quick reminder or look something up without interrupting your workflow. Siri requires manual activation, unless your iOS device is plugged in, and while Google Now has become more widely available for voice commands on Android phones, it’s still not as reliable as an always-on assistant.

Inspired by actual assistants, Microsoft also gave Cortana a notebook that contains all of your personal preferences. Many of them she learns over time, but you can also hop straight into the notebook and tell Cortana things like your food preferences, and what sort of restaurant you prefer. All of that will help her return more personalized answers for future queries. Cortana is also part of Microsoft’s plan to bring its services to all of your devices: Microsoft is bringing it to Android soon and iOS eventually, and in each case the app will include Cortana’s notebook of your preferences.
Cortana handles voice commands about as well as Siri and Google Now. It’s pretty accurate when it comes to recognizing your voice input (although that also depends heavily on the quality of your microphone), and in many cases it even fetched more useful results than Siri. It’s not nearly as preemptive with information as Google’s offering, though. That assistant is smart enough to warn me when I should leave for my next meeting, or when my latest Amazon orders have arrived. Those are things we’ll eventually see on every virtual assistant, but at the moment Google Now remains the smartest one overall, even if it’s not much of a conversationalist. Cortana is the most human-sounding assistant; so there’s that.
Edge: Sayonara, Internet Explorer

If you ever wanted Microsoft to just give up on Internet Explorer and create a web browser from scratch, Edge may be just what you’re looking for. It forgoes all of the legacy protocols, like ActiveX, that turned Internet Explorer into a slow and insecure beast. And it takes a few lessons from Google’s Chrome with a minimalist style and speedy browser engine. In fact, I ended up preferring Edge to Chrome in my testing, mainly because Google’s browser has become a major memory hog over the years.
Edge may be the most elegant piece of software to come from Microsoft. Its interface is simple: tabs on the top; back, forward and refresh buttons below; and an address bar. The latter is smarter than other browsers as it also features Cortana (without the voice commands). You can type in questions and often get them answered right within Edge’s location bar — no need to hit Enter to complete your search. That’s something Google has been dabbling with in Chrome, but Edge takes it to another level.
You can manage your Favorites, Reading List entries (articles you save to read later), History and Downloads from Edge’s Hub, which mostly stays out of the way until you need it. Microsoft also gave Edge annotating capabilities: You can highlight and mark up web pages any way you like (the Surface’s stylus comes in handy for this) and send them off to Evernote with just a few clicks. Those marked-up pages also retain your notes when you visit them again.
A much better Xbox app

While the Xbox app was a decent way to stay connected to your gaming friends in Windows 8, now it’s actually useful for gaming. Windows 10 can stream games from any Xbox One on your home network (and eventually Xbox 360s) — all you need to do is plug an Xbox One controller into your PC and hit the streaming button on the Xbox app. The games still run on your Xbox One; it’s just spitting out a real-time video feed to your computer rather than just your TV. As you can imagine, such a feature requires pretty strong network capabilities, so I’d recommend plugging either your Xbox or computer into Ethernet (ideally both) to use it. Streaming over WiFi is possible, but even with a strong router, I ran into issues testing out this feature.
My Surface Pro 3 refused to hold a stream for more than a few seconds (I think it may not be playing nicely with my 5GHz 802.11n wireless network), while my desktop gaming PC (also connected to my 5GHz N network with a large external antenna) handled it just fine. I was able to race in Forza Horizon 2 and play some Destiny matches with the same amount of control as I had on the Xbox One. There are some video artifacts, and the connection occasionally cut out, so it’s not ideal for truly important gaming scenarios. Still, these are early days, and I can imagine Microsoft will continue to optimize how Windows 10’s game streaming works on typical home networks. If you’ve got a high-end AC router, you’ll probably have fewer issues.
The Xbox app also serves as a single hub for all of the games on your computer; it even managed to find Broken Age, which I installed via Steam, and you can manually add games as well. You can also start a party chat with people on your friends list, as well as share clips from your Game DVR library on Xbox Live. Overall, it’s simply a much more functional offering than the Windows 8 Xbox app.
Other apps

Windows 10 also features redesigned versions of core apps, like Mail, Calendar, Maps and the Windows Store. They all adopt the minimalist aesthetic from Windows 10, but what’s really interesting about them is that they’re universal apps, meaning they’re the exact same apps that will run on Windows 10 phones later this year. We’re still waiting to see how third-party developers latch onto Microsoft’s universal apps — those that can be written once and run across multiple devices — but the company has at least proven they’re possible with Windows 10.
Apps were a big focus at Microsoft’s Build developer conference, and for good reason. One of Windows 8’s big issues was that it didn’t attract a healthy developer community like iOS and Android, even though Microsoft has been talking about the idea of universal apps even before that OS launched. To that end, Microsoft also announced that developers will be able to recompile their iOS and Android apps to work on Windows 10. In fact, that’s how King brought Candy Crush Saga over to Windows. There are also new developer tools for iOS and Linux, so developers don’t even need to run Windows to build Windows apps.

As for those new Windows 10 apps, they all look and function better than their Windows 8 counterparts. Mostly, that’s because you can actually run them in traditional windows. The Mail and Calendar apps, in particular, are good enough that I’ll likely be sticking with them for the time being. They’re fast, relatively lightweight and attractive — the sort of thing you normally had to rely on non-Microsoft developers to create. The News app is also more useful than I thought it would be. It’s basically Microsoft’s spin on news readers like Feedly, except built right into the OS. News did a decent job of alerting me to interesting tidbits, like when NASA discovered an Earth-like exoplanet, and even without much training it highlighted news it knew I would be interested in.
The upgraded Windows Store app also makes it much easier to locate and install new apps. Again, since you’re not forced to navigate it in fullscreen, you can actually use it without completely disrupting your workflow. It feels more like Apple’s Mac Store app now, which is a huge improvement over Windows 8. Many Windows users still have to get used to the notion of using an app store to find software, and this redesigned Store app goes a long way towards making that happen.
Pricing and system requirements

Microsoft surprised everyone when it announced that it would be giving away Windows 10 for free (specifically for existing Windows 7 and 8 users). It showed that, for once, it was more interested in getting people to use Windows than it was in forcing people to pay for yet another upgrade. Instead, Microsoft made it clear that it was far more important to actually get people on Windows 10, which would make it a more viable platform for developers, as well as a gateway to its many online services. Windows 10 is more than a piece of retail software; it’s the basis of Microsoft’s future Windows empire.
After that first year, Windows 10 Home will cost $120, while the Pro version will go for $200. I wouldn’t be surprised if Microsoft ends up extending its free offer even further though, especially if Windows 10 really ends up taking off. As usual, the Home version of Windows 10 is the one meant for most consumers, while the Pro version adds advanced features like Active Directory support. There are also editions meant for enterprise users and schools, and of course we’ll see it hit mobile devices later this fall. (Side note: Microsoft also removed Windows Media Center in Windows 10, so be prepared for that shocker if you actually used it.)
As far as basic requirements go, Windows 10 is pretty much the same as Windows 8: You’ll need at least a 1GHz processor and 1GB of RAM (2GB for the 64-bit version), as well as 16/20GB of free hard drive space for the 32-bit/64-bit editions. Basically, just about anyone can run Windows 10. You can’t buy a computer these days that doesn’t meet those specs.
Wrap-up

I had high hopes for Windows 10 after Microsoft’s Build conference, where I noted that, for once, the company was acting as a leader, not a follower. Windows 10 delivers the most refined desktop experience ever from Microsoft, and yet it’s so much more than that. It’s also a decent tablet OS, and it’s ready for a world filled with hybrid devices. And, barring another baffling screwup, it looks like a significant step forward for mobile. Heck, it makes the Xbox One a more useful machine.
It’s nice, for once, to be able to recommend a new version of Windows without any hesitation. If you’ve got a Windows 7 or 8 machine, there’s no reason not to take advantage of Microsoft’s free upgrade offer. And if, for some reason, you have a machine that’s older than Windows 7, Windows 10 is good enough to justify getting a new computer.
Twitter is making more money while signing up fewer users
Twitter’s got a new temporary boss in Jack Dorsey (who’s actually the old boss) while it continues to search for a replacement for ex-CEO Dick Costolo as it dropped its second quarter earnings today. The bright spot is that its second quarter revenue was $502 million, a 61-percent year-over-year increase from last year. But the white-dude-in-charge switcheroo didn’t do much to supercharge Twitter’s monthly active users. The social network’s users only grew slightly from its first quarter number 308 million to 316 million this quarter which is a 15 percent increase from last year at this time. These numbers include SMS Fast Followers who Twitter did not include in its user numbers last quarter.
In today’s release, Interim CEO Jack Dorsey stated, “our Q2 results show good progress in monetization, but we are not satisfied with our growth in audience.” Dorsey also stated that the company needs to improve in three areas that include, “ensure more disciplined execution, simplify our service to deliver Twitter’s value faster, and better communicate that value.” Whatever that means.
While the revenue numbers are good (even though the company is still not profitable), the user growth is disappointing and the company continues to shed executives. Vice President of Product Management, Christian Oestlien announced that he was going to YouTube a few minutes before the results were released.
I am thrilled to be joining @YouTube! I can’t wait to start work with the team and our partners building the future of video together.
– Christian Oestlien (@christianism) July 28, 2015
Product Director Todd Jackson also announced he was leaving the company minutes before the results were released.
Excited for what’s next – joining @Dropbox to lead product and work alongside an incredible team!
– Todd Jackson (@tjack) July 28, 2015
During the live call, Dorsey noted that the Twitter team needs to focus and that the company will continue to question the reverse chronological timeline. Which is an odd statement because that’s basically how Twitter works.
There was also talk of integrating Vine, Periscope and Twitter into a single experience. While there is no update about that right now, CFO Anthony Noto said connecting the three experiences is a goal. In the meantime, Dorsey has a vision for the social network.
He stated that for users, Twitter should be, “as easy as looking out your window to see what’s happening, delivered first before anyone else, direct from the source. Twitter also has to be the most powerful microphone in the world.”
But getting people to use that microphone has been difficult. According to Twitter research, Noto said, “the number one reason that users don’t use twitter is that they don’t understand why to use Twitter.”
As for finding a new Twitter CEO, Dorsey said, “we do not have an update to provide today.”
[Image credit: Shutterstock]
Filed under: Internet
Source: Twitter
German privacy watchdog orders Facebook to stay out of usernames
Facebook’s authentic name policy was meant to make the social media platform a safe place where “pretending to be anything or anyone isn’t allowed.” But, ironically the policy bred harassment instead of curtailing it. Most recently, Facebook blocked a German user’s account (as it often does) for using an alias, asked her to provide a copy of her ID and swapped her pseudonym with her real name without her consent. The user filed a complaint, claiming she had picked a fictitious name to avoid unwarranted business queries. The Hamburg Data Protection Authority responded and stepped in to protect her privacy rights. According to a Reuters report, the German agency has ordered Facebook to let users pick pseudonyms. The company can no longer control or change the usernames. What’s more, it can’t ask users for their IDs.
Facebook isn’t pleased with the order. So far, the company’s argued the Irish defense. Back in 2011, when a privacy agency in Ireland concluded that the company’s new name policy did not interfere with their laws, it validated the company’s justification that the tool was designed to protect users from online abuse. Ever since, the social media giant reportedly maintained that with a headquarters in Ireland it should only be obligated to abide by Irish laws. With this new order, the commissioner of Hamburg’s Data Protection Authority has taken a stand against that argument. He told Reuters: “For that matter Facebook cannot again argue that only Irish Data Protection law would be applicable … anyone who stands on our pitch also has to play our game.”
Filed under: Facebook
Source: Reuters
Amazon proposes a delivery drone flight plan
Following the FAA’s recent relaxation of commercial drone flight regulations, Amazon is forging ahead with plans to employ the machines for deliveries. But first, the company has proposed some ground rules to keep the fledgling industry flying safely and out of the way of manned aircraft. Currently the FAA only allows drones to climb to 400 feet and they must remain within the pilot’s line of sight. They also cannot be operated within five miles of an airport. Amazon’s proposal builds off these initial restrictions with faster, long-range drones flying between 200 and 400 feet up. Slower and short-range drones would operate below 200 feet.
The biggest challenge is making sure that these machines don’t run into obstacles, airplanes, helicopters or each other. As such Amazon wants every drone to file the UAV equivalent of a flight plan prior to takeoff, just like manned aircraft already do. The drones would also need to maintain an internet connection in case they need to receive emergency instructions (i.e. “Thunderstorm ahead. Land now.”) as well as obstacle avoidance and sensing systems to keep them from crashing into trees, birds, utility poles or just sideswiping one another.
It’s basically a mirror of the current (and exceedingly safe) system employed by the FAA for commercial airliners. What’s more, Amazon wants to create a neutral central computer system to handle all of these flight plans and location data that any participating company could freely access. This access would extend from hobbyists flying homebrew quadcopters to tech giants like Amazon, Google and Facebook along a tiered flightpath scheme. “It’s completely doable,” Gur Kimchi, Amazon’s VP of drone delivery, told Bloomberg News. “We think it’s something feasible that everyone can rally around.”
[Image Credit: Amazon/Associated Press]
Filed under: Wireless, Science, Apple, Google, Amazon, Facebook
Source: Bloomberg
HBO Now comes to Verizon’s internet customers
Cablevision isn’t the only big US internet provider offering HBO Now — Verizon* is also joining the fray. Anyone with broadband on Big Red can now use their existing account to sign up for the cord cutter service, complete with the usual 30-day trial run and $15 per month subscription. It’s ultimately not much different than subscribing yourself, and you’ve probably already done that if you were determined to watch Game of Thrones or Veep without paying for traditional TV. Look it at this way, though: if nothing else, it’s a token kindness from a telco that’s known for trying to stifle net neutrality and otherwise limit the success of internet video services.
Filed under: Home Entertainment, Internet, HD, Verizon
Source: Verizon
VSCO Cam goes social with latest update
VSCO Cam, a third-party camera app for mobile photography, has released an update that adds a bit of a social media component to the platform. VSCO Cam now has a “Collections” feature that will let users share images with their friends who also have the app.
Along with the ability to publish images to Collections, users can connect and check out other’s Collections. VSCO Cam also added a new double tap option that will publish particularly inspiring images to a Collection.
VSCO Cam updated the user interface to incorporate a redesigned sign-in process and updated icons, menus and other graphical elements. As usual, there are bug fixes and other issues addressed in the update.
To check for the updated version or to install and try VSCO Cam, use one of the download links below.
Come comment on this article: VSCO Cam goes social with latest update
Mid-range smackdown: Oppo R7, Samsung A7, Asus ZenFone 2, and Sony Xperia M4 Aqua

OPPO R7, the company’s mid-range champion.
Not too long ago, it was surprisingly difficult to find an unlocked, capable smartphone for an affordable price point. To get a mobile device that worked properly, it wasn’t uncommon that users would need to spend anywhere around $500-$800. Luckily for everyone, a number of device manufacturers have been releasing smartphones that are capable of handling everyday tasks, but still won’t break the bank.
Specifically, lesser known but rapidly growing smartphone companies such as OPPO and Asus have been releasing some great devices, and so have well-known manufacturers like Samsung and Sony. But how do the most prominent mid-tier smartphones from these companies compare? While this is not a complete list by any means, we decided to pit just a few mid-range handsets against one another to see how they fare.
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;
Specifications
Today we’ll be comparing the OPPO R7, Samsung Galaxy A7, ASUS ZenFone 2, and the Sony Xperia M4 Aqua. It should be noted early on that we haven’t reviewed the Galaxy A7, though given its comparable specifications to the competition, we thought it to be a good device to add to the comparison. Although these smartphones bring somewhat similar specifications and price points to the table, many of them still differ from one another when it comes to overall user experience. Before we get too far into the details, let’s take a look at the specification list below:
| OPPO R7 | Samsung Galaxy A7 (A700FD) | Sony Xperia M4 Aqua | ASUS ZenFone 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.0-inch Super AMOLED display with 1080 x 1920 resolution | 5.5-inch Super AMOLED display with 1080 x 1920 resolution | 5.0-inch IPS LCD display with 720 x 1280 resolution | 5.5-inch IPS LCD display with 1080 x 1920 resolution |
| Processor | 1.5 GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 | 1.5 GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 | 2.3GHz quad-core Intel Atom Z3580 (4GB RAM), 1.8GHz quad-core Intel Atom Z3560 (2GB RAM) |
| RAM | 3GB | 2GB | 2GB | 2/4GB |
| Storage | 16GB, expandable up to 128GB | 16GB, expandable up to 64GB | 8/16GB, expandable up to 128GB | 16/32/64GB, expandable up to 64GB |
| GPU | Adreno 305 | Adreno 405 | Adreno 405 | PowerVR G6430 |
| Camera | 13MP rear f/2.2 8MP front-facing f/2.4 |
13MP rear camera 5MP front camera |
13 MP rear camera 5MP front camera |
13MP rear camera 5MP front camera |
| Software | Color OS 2.1, Android 4.4.2 KitKat | Samsung TouchWiz, Android 5.0.2 Lollipop | Android 5.0 Lollipop | Zen UI, Android 5.0 Lollipop |
| Battery | 2,320mAh, non-removable | 2,600mAh, non-removable | 2,400mAh, non-removable | 3,000mAh, non-removable |
| Dimensions | 143 x 71 x 6.3mm, 147g | 151 x 76.2 x 6.3mm, 141g | 145.5 x 72.6 x 7.3mm, 136g | 152.5 x 77.2 x 10.9mm, 170g |
| Fast charging | Yes | No | No | Yes |
Display

Bringing a great price tag and solid specs, the Asus ZenFone 2 is one of the best mid-range options on the market.
To begin, let’s talk about the display. Mid-tier smartphones have come a long way on the display front, with many options now hitting the market with Full HD panels – and that’s true for the ZenFone 2, the Oppo R7 and the Samsung Galaxy A7. The big difference between these displays, however, is that the R7 and A7 both feature Super AMOLED displays instead of an LCD. AMOLED vs. LCD is still an ongoing debate, but much of the time you’ll find more vivid colors with AMOLED technology and there are certainly a number of folks that prefer AMOLED over LCD.
Unfortunately, Sony chose to go with a 5.0-inch 720p panel on their device, which might upset a few users hoping to get the clear 1080p resolution out of their mid-tier smartphone. Even though having a device with a lower resolution display might result in a tad better battery life, we’re sure most users would choose Full HD over this option if given the chance.
Performance

With a Snapdragon 615, the OPPO R7 stands towards the top when it comes to performance.
When it comes to performance, none of these smartphones are particularly poor at handling everyday tasks, though a few still manage to stand out from the rest. The OPPO R7 and ZenFone 2 both performed really well in our full reviews, largely due to their impressive internals.
Featuring 3GB of RAM and a Snapdragon 615 CPU, the R7 is quite the competitor to the ZenFone 2 with 4GB of RAM and Atom Z3580 CPU. Both devices handle gaming quite well, and they do a great job at performing everyday tasks. The Snapdragon 615 found in both the R7 and A7 has proven itself to be quite a capable processor overtime, making both OPPO’s and Samsung’s offerings a great option for those looking for a device with a reliable processor. It should be noted, however, that we have not posted a full review of the A7, so we aren’t as informed on this device as we are with the others. As for the Atom Z3580, while it might perform similarly, Qualcomm processors tend to have better app compatibility and simply have a better rep (810 overheating drama aside).
Last on the list is the Xperia M4 Aqua. While this device features the same 615 processor found in the R7 and A7, our reviews have found that Sony’s offering tends to overheat relatively easily when playing games, which is one of our biggest points of contention with the device.
Camera

The M4 Aqua stands out when it comes to camera performance.
Oddly enough, all four of the devices we’re comparing today feature 13MP rear-facing cameras, though there’s still a big difference when it comes to image quality.
No matter which device you pick out of the lot, you won’t be disappointed in the camera department. But if you want a mid-range smartphone with a camera that stands above the rest, we’d suggest going with the Xperia M4 Aqua. In our full review, Sony’s offering consistently produced shots with great detail and with vivid colors. Sony’s camera app is quite simplistic and doesn’t come with too many features, though more can be downloaded separately.
Next up we have the OPPO R7 and ASUS ZenFone 2, which both produced average shots in our full reviews. Although we haven’t tested the A7’s camera for ourself, Samsung devices in the past have consistently produced well-balanced, accurate photos. Like most other smartphone cameras, these devices perform best in well-lit areas, with a noticeable decline in quality when moved into low-light situations. Ultimately, the R7 struggles in the post-processing department, while the ZenFone 2 fails to provide an acceptable amount of dynamic range.
All of the extras

One of Sony’s signature features is waterproofing, and so it is great to see this present in the Xperia M4 Aqua.
Design and build quality are two big areas where manufacturers are shifting focus in the mid-range market, and all four of these smartphones surely don’t disappoint on that front. Whether you choose to go with the familiar design language of Sony’s Xperia M4 Aqua or the premium-feeling OPPO R7, we’re sure most of you won’t have to sacrifice too much when it comes to overall design.
OEMs are also noticeably focusing on their software experiences, too. All of these devices feature software that’s been toned down significantly throughout the past few months, which has been a big pain point for mid-rangers in the past. OPPO’s simplified ColorOS provides a much smoother overall experience, while the ZenFone 2, Xperia M4 Aqua and Galaxy A7 are much more feature-rich than the others. When it comes to software, it ultimately comes down to which OEM skin you prefer, but you really can’t go wrong with any of these options.

Quick charging? Yes please!
All four of these devices come with non-removable batteries, but that actually may not be a deal breaker. These mid-range offerings can all last around a full day on a single charge, though not much more than that. What’s more, you don’t have to worry about running out of space on your device, because all of them also come with microSD card slots.
The differences begin to really stand out when we take into account other attractive features such as IP68 water and dust resistance or quick charging technology. For instance, I’d much rather recommend the Sony option to anyone who spends the majority of their summer days sitting next to the pool, but I’d rather recommend the OPPO R7 or ZenFone 2 to someone who needs to charge their battery in half the time thanks to integrated quick charging.
Pricing and final thoughts

OPPO R7’s design and performance put it towards the top of the list, though ZenFone 2 and the others follow close behind.
Choosing the right smartphone isn’t always an easy decision, and it can take some time to figure out what best suits your needs. Out of the pack, the OPPO R7 seemingly stands out above the rest if you’re looking for a powerful handset with an ultra-premium build and high-end features like quick charging. The ZenFone 2 certainly follows close behind, though many may be turned off by its choice of an Intel processor and its somewhat less attractive design (though that last point is completely subjective).
The Samsung Galaxy A7 also seems like a capable enough device, though we think it’s price tag may be too high for most users looking for a solid mid-range offering. As for the Sony Xperia M4 Aqua? Special features like waterproofing are great, though we certainly are a bit alarmed by the device’s apparent overheating issues.
Related: Best Android phones (June 2015)
All in all, this post is meant to condense our full reviews down to make it easier for you to decide on which phone is right for you. However, that’s not always the easiest way to get information across, so we’ve also linked our full reviews down below. Feel free to let us know which device you think is worth your hard-earned cash, and why the other smartphones won’t find their way into your pocket anytime soon.
More on these great devices
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;
Check out our full reviews:
What is the Moto X Pure Edition?
Today we saw the announcement of three new devices from Motorola: the Moto X Style, Moto X Play, and the new Moto G. However, for consumers in the US, we are only getting the Moto X Style. For whatever reasons, Motorola is not advertising it as such here in the states.
A quick trip to motorola.com/us/home leads you to some new banners and such, advertising the new Moto G (seeing as it’s the only phone of the aforementioned three available now). Glancing down the page you see something that says “Express yourself with Moto X Pure Edition” with a link to “Learn More”. After today’s announcement, many Android blogs and websites seem to be confusing things for consumers here in the US regarding what exactly they should be looking forward to. Hopefully I can clear that up!
What is the Moto X Pure Edition?
“Moto X Pure Edition” is not a new term used by Motorola. For last year’s flagship, that was the version of the phone purchased directly from Motorola’s website that was unlocked, off-contract, with no carrier branding, ready to use on any carrier using GSM radios (mostly nerd-talk, if you don’t understand that just ignore it). That is essentially what is happening with the newest Moto X, except this time Motorola is taking it a step further.
Now, in the US at least, the Moto X Pure Edition is the only Moto X you can buy, and refers to the Moto X Style announced this morning. This means that Motorola’s newest flagship will not be available in carrier stores, only on motorola.com, amazon.com, and bestbuy.com. The only brick-and-mortar store the Moto X Pure Edition will be available in is Best Buy stores. Furthermore, the Moto X Pure Edition can be used on any carrier. Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, or any other carrier that sells SIM cards can be used with this phone.
Motorola says that most consumers care more about their Android smartphone being “pure” than anything else. So, Motorola is taking this to the furthest places it can, by selling the Moto X Pure Edition.
Any other reason I should care?
Short answer: yes.
Motorola’s new flagship is openly embracing the no-contract model carriers have been introducing, and are essentially snubbing any carrier’s desire to have a version of their phone made specifically for them. No longer do you need to have the right Moto X to use on your carrier, because that doesn’t exist. The implications are huge.
For those concerned about how much this will cost, don’t fret. The new Moto X Pure Edition starts at $399. No, that is not a typo.
For those concerned about dropping $399 right away, you also shouldn’t fret. Motorola for awhile has been offering ways to set up a payment plan for their phones, and Best Buy has similar options as well.
Too Long; Didn’t Read: The Moto X Pure Edition is the only Moto X available in the US (the one announced as the Moto X Style this morning), and is not being sold by individual carriers, but rather is available online and in Best Buy, unlocked and ready to use for whatever carrier you’d like.
Thoughts? Drop us a comment below.
The post What is the Moto X Pure Edition? appeared first on AndroidGuys.












