Yahoo Aviate gains new powers with ‘Smart Stream’
Yahoo’s Aviate home screen launcher gets even smarter this week with the introduction of a new Smart Stream feature. Not unlike what Google Now does for users, Smart Stream adjusts itself throughout the day to deliver timely and relevant information to the user. What’s more, it can also offer up details and tidbits based on location.
Aviate is designed to replace the stock app launcher for your Android phone. Owned by Yahoo, it’s a different approach to the stuff you might find preloaded on your handset. Aviate is a free download and works with devices running 4.1 Jelly Bean or higher.
“Imagine you’re walking downtown in San Francisco on a Saturday around noon. We’ll surface nearby restaurants so that you can find a yummy place to eat. When the Giants game starts at 1pm, we’ll bring you live sports scores. If you plug in your headphones, we’ll pull your music apps up to the top of your Smart Stream. If there’s ever a specific card you’re looking for, you can always access it with the Focus menu, located in the search bar on your homescreen.“
If you are looking for a different approach to launching apps and games, Aviate should be high on your list. It gets smarter with each update and the configuration options are quite user-friendly. We’re fond of this one and think you’d enjoy it.
The post Yahoo Aviate gains new powers with ‘Smart Stream’ appeared first on AndroidGuys.
Pebble Time review
Once the pioneer of the smart wearable, Pebble has managed to find continued and impressive success in the face of ever-growing competition in this market from Google, Apple, Samsung and others. The company is back again with their latest smartwatch offering that, despite what the competition is doing, doesn’t divert too far from Pebble’s traditional path, which is something that consumers don’t seem to mind, if their hugely successful Kickstarter campaign is any indication. So is the latest Pebble
So is the latest Pebble smartwatch deserving of a place on your wrist? We find out in this comprehensive Pebble Time review.
Design

The most important feature of the Pebble Time is the update to the design, and though this is the original edition that is made of hard plastic materials, a Steel version with the same general aesthetic will soon be on its way to Kickstarter backers as well. In a stark contrast from the taller overall design of the original Pebble, the face of the Pebble Time is more symmetrical and looks quite a bit like a very tiny old-school TV on the wrist. Contributing to the rather wide body of the watch is a significant bezel around the display, that adds further distance from the edges of the screen to the edges of the watch itself.

The sides of the body house the button layout, with the selection button flanked by the up and down navigation keys on the right, with a back button towards the top on the left side. A water resistant microphone is just below the buttons on the right, that can be used for any voice input. The buttons start off squishy, but end with a strong click at the end, and feel pretty sturdy all around. The availability and usage of the buttons is one of the main differences between Pebble devices and the other smartwatches out there, with Pebble still favoring this implementation over complete touchscreen control.

For those who like to customize their watch, the usual 22 mm prongs are available at the top and bottom, which should allow users to replace the included strap with any of their own choice. That said, the fact that they tend to stick out quite a bit makes it difficult to find a replacement watch strap that doesn’t end up looking a bit weird. Cuts in the strap will tend to stick out, and don’t fill the blank space between the body and the watch enough to look stylish. The back of the Pebble Time houses the charging and expansion port, through which we will hopefully see smartstraps become a reality. Underneath the port is a clear indication that this particular version is a Kickstarter edition of the watch, with a big “Kickstarter Backer” label as a reminder that I was an early adopter.

Design has been one of the most polarizing aspects of the Pebble Time, and it is somewhat obvious as to why. While this watch is quite the departure from what the original Pebble looked like, it is also quite far from a traditional timepiece, something that other smartwatch makers have been at least attempting to achieve. Despite the usage of the word watch, it is perfectly alright for some smartwatches to feature a unique aesthetic, which the Pebble Time does, and what it does well is present the screen with enough room around it to express itself, in a simple and elegant way.

With just enough space for the buttons to be of a comfortable size, the Pebble Time isn’t particularly thick, and is quite light on the wrist as well. It is so light, in fact, that you might actually forget you are wearing the device throughout the day. The search for a better watch strap might prove to be a bit of a nuisance, but the original band available helps keep it inconspicuous at first glance, though the device itself will lead to some curiosity on the double take.
Display

The Pebble Time brings with it an upgrade to the e-paper display, which now provides color, resulting in a new level of character being added to the applications in the Pebble ecosystem. The colors are really muted however, but this isn’t unexpected, given the nature of this display. Though the colors allow for an easy distinction among different elements, you certainly won’t be amazed by this enhancement the way you might by the color displays featured on Android Wear devices and other competitors.

What the Pebble Time does bring forward from its predecessor is with regards to visibility, with a mostly positive effect. In broad daylight, it is really easy to see what is on the screen, and in well-lit scenarios it is a treat to have this always-on display when compared to some of the competition — which have displays that must first be triggered on before they will display. Where the display falls short though is in lower light situations, with the backlight not having been engineered to its best potential.

Though bright enough for easy viewing, a hard flick of the wrist is needed to trigger it, and apart from the fact that the movement is quite jarring, it doesn’t work 100 percent of the time. When it does work, the backlight stays on for only a short amount of time, which can become very frustrating. While there is a third-party app available in the store that helps remedy this issue, it is a shame that this kind of functionality isn’t better implemented out of the box. Hopefully, a substantial firmware update in the future will help make the backlight better.
Performance

When it comes to performance, the Pebble Time performs as well as its predecessor, which is a very good thing, even if speed and snappiness aren’t too difficult to come by when applications are given a simple, but effective, platform to work on. Under the hood, an updated ARM Cortex processor is accompanied by a larger amount of storage, allowing for a bump in the number of apps you can have installed from 8 to as many as 50 this time around. Getting through a large app list may prove too annoying though, but that is about all that will slow down Pebble Time users.

Animations when transitioning between screens don’t take too long to finish, but does keep tasks from feeling instantaneous like before. This short loading time is easy to forgive though, as these animations to add some character to the overall experience. The only real slowdown is with the new Pebble Time application for Android, which still takes some time to load lists of apps and watch faces. Once you find what you are looking for however, adding it to the watch requires a very short transfer time.
Hardware

On the hardware side of things, some new additions help add to the overall experience and usability, bringing it up to the mark with what you’d expect from a current generation smartwatch. To start with, the Pebble Time comes with resistance to dust and water and a Gorilla Glass 3 panel to protect the display and help keep it scratch-free.

The big enhancement in its capabilities is in voice. The microphone nestled below the right buttons does require Android Wear to be installed though, allowing the Pebble Time to take advantage of Wear’s API for voice input. While it can’t be triggered at any point to perform a search on Google, it does provide the useful opportunity to respond to messages using your voice, which works about just as well as it would on any Android Wear device.

Another highlight of the original Pebble was battery life, and it’s great to see that feature carry over to the Pebble Time as well. Not a lot of devices that claim to offer incredible battery life live up to that claim, but that is certainly not the case here. The Pebble Time can comfortably last close a full week of usage, which includes a lot of vibrations and backlight usage throughout the day. The cherry on top is the fact that the charging time is also short, and just an hour of having the device tethered to the magnetic cable is enough to get the device back to a full charge. The fact that it doesn’t need to be removed and placed on a dock every night is great, and even when it does need to be, it wouldn’t have to be off the wrist for very long.
Software

When it comes to the software side of things, the underlying foundation of the Pebble Time is exactly the same as the original. All the applications installed using the Android app are transferred over to the watch, with now up to 50 apps allowed to be installed, compared to the 8 with its predecessor.

Not all the applications have been updated for the color screen or for the new Timeline feature, but all of them can still be installed and used, and will simply be presented in their original monochrome iterations. Of course, notifications remain a key part of this platform, as any notification you get on your phone from any and all applications appear in previews on the watch, making it very easy to decide whether you actually need to reach for your phone. Notification handling is definitely the main point of a smartwatch, and is one of those features that you must feel for yourself to really the huge advantage it offers.

The biggest addition to the way the Pebble Time software feels is the Timeline, which is an agenda-based UI that can be triggered by going up or down from the main watch face. You can see what is coming up on your schedule, see what you might have missed recently, and also whether you’re approaching sunrise or sunset. The overall functionality is being expanded all the time as well, and there is already an app that can create a custom Timeline entry for a simple reminder. This is a fantastic feature for anyone that is wholly dependent on their calendar, and as mentioned, this will only continue to get better with more apps adding information like sports scores and travel times.

What makes the new Pebble firmware standout is its character, and that is exactly what colors and new animations bring. Initially, the extra time needed to even show these quirky animations felt like time lost, but it really doesn’t matter once you get used to them. Once the task is triggered via a button press, you are likely not going to stick around to watch them all happen anyway. If you do, however, you’ll see a charming and quirky animation that will bring a smile to your face, like a star that tells you that you’re all set, or an ostrich digging its head into the ground when notifications are muted.

Apple’s watch OS features an elegant but ultimately predictable look and feel, and Google’s OS offers a somewhat sterile information based system, but what the Pebble Time brings to the table is a different kind of take, and one that isn’t afraid to look a little goofy while still getting the job done admirably. It speaks to what kind of community the Pebble team knows it has, and makes the Pebble Time a platform for the company to be clear on what makes it different from the rest, which is the way it expresses itself. All in all, the software might get a couple new abilities and some color, but what gives the Pebble such a loyal following is how unique it is, inside and out.
Gallery
Pricing and Final Thoughts
Though I pledged $179 on the Kickstarter, the Pebble Time is available for pre-order and will come to Best Buy stores by the end of July with a price tag of $199.

So there you have it for this in-depth look at the Pebble Time! $199 might seem like a lot, considering there are some high quality Android Wear watches coming down in cost. Even the original Pebble watches are easy to find in retail stores for $99, which sounds like quite a steal these days for a full featured smartwatch. That said, for anyone that already supported Pebble before, the pledge price, and perhaps even this retail price, makes perfect sense, because the Pebble ecosystem makes more sense to them than the competition, and I think I fall in that category.
If you are looking to be convinced, there is a lot going in favor of the Pebble Time when you consider some of the pitfalls associated with almost any other smartwatch out there. Touchscreens can be fidgety, where tactile input is very reliable. Battery life on full LCD screens don’t go much further than 2 days, let alone 7. Finally, while Apple and Google stick to their guns in terms of look, feel, and also compatibility, the Pebble is functional across both platforms and gets tasks done just as well, while not taking itself too seriously. Smartwatches are still on the bubble between need and want, but among the smart wearables I have, it doesn’t take much time for me to decide which one I prefer on the daily.
Sony’s Cast-friendly speakers offer high-res and multi-room audio
If you’re a fan of using Google’s Cast tech, AirPlay or Spotify Connect to handle your wireless speaker duties, Sony announced a trio of audio gadgets that play nice with all three. Continuing its affinity for alphanumeric product names, the company’s SRS-X77, SRS-X88 and SRS-X99 speakers also feature a Sonos-like multi-room experience thanks to the Song Pal app. The pricier two of the lot, the SRS-X88 and SRS-X99, add in support for high-resolution audio via USB and a thumb drive or direct connection to your computer. If you prefer to go that route, you can expect compatibility with AAC, FLAC, WAV and other file formats that offer better sound quality over a regular ol’ MP3. The SRS-X88 and SRS-X99 also pack in a S-Master HX digital amplifier and LDAC tech that’s said to keep Bluetooth streams sounding top notch (from compatible devices, natch). The difference main between the two? Power. The SRS-X88 has five speakers at 90 watts and the SRS-X99 houses seven with 154 watts. I guess it really just depends on how loud you want to blast “Hells Bells.”
So, what about that SRS-X77? You’ll still get the wireless chops of AirPlay, Cast and Connect, but this is more of an entry-level device, so it doesn’t offer those features that audiophiles may be looking for. That being said, it’s also the most affordable at $300 while the SRS-X88 and SRS-X99 are priced at $400 and $700, respectively. All three speakers are available for pre-order now, and will arrive later this month at Amazon, Best Buy and the Sony online store.
Filed under: Portable Audio/Video, HD, Sony
The cable box might solve the Internet of Things’ biggest problem
The issue with the Internet of Things (IoT) and the connected home is that they’re not even remotely connected. At least not seamlessly. Thanks to competing communication protocols and manufacturers building closed ecosystems, you need a new app every time you add something “connected” to your house. But developer Alticast has proposed another solution. One that uses something that’s already in the home: your cable box.
Other than the fact that it gives you access to hundreds of channels and videos-on-demand, your cable box is about as exciting as a doorknob. It’s a gateway to somewhere else, and it’s forgotten as soon as you step through that door. But that bland portal to the entertainment world could also be the answer to fixing the hydra of IoT hubs from Belkin, Lowe’s, Quirky, Philips and others needed to create a connected home. Alticast proposed in a recently published white paper that the cable box could become a protocol-agnostic Internet-of-Things hub. It would bring all your devices together into a single ecosystem that lets your lights talk to your oven that talks to your garage door that talks to your security camera. Everything working together like a truly connected home with a single app and the bonus of your TV being a giant notification center.
Imagine your TV pausing and throwing up a video feed from a security camera in your garage that’s tripped by a connected garage door opener. This would be possible if your cable box (or set-top box) aggregated all your devices into a single ecosystem. An ecosystem that not only lets you control your home, but also lowers the risk of your home being hacked because you’ve reduced the access points to a single device. You’re only as secure as your weakest access point and with multiple hubs tied to your network, all it takes is one of those devices to be compromised and suddenly someone is turning off your lights and turning up your fancy, new connected stove.
As always, though, there’s likely to be a catch: If the cable industry does go full-tilt into the Internet of Things, expect an additional surcharge on your cable bill. Comcast already offers a security system to its customers starting at an additional $40 a month. By adding a connected home service, it could pull in extra revenue and keep some folks from jumping ship and joining the world of cord-cutters. But even if you said to hell with cable TV, the cable companies that also deliver your internet access could add connected-home functions to the modems they rent to ISP customers. Either way, the cable company makes money on the tech world’s inability to get it together and agree on a standard.
It’s not like some in the tech world are ignoring the fragmentation issue. Qualcomm has been working on creating a standard with others in the industry with the AllSeen Alliance to create a universal framework. While it’s gaining partners, there are still enough device makers in the market that would rather create their own closed ecosystem.
Meanwhile, don’t expect anything resembling an IoT hub from Roku and Apple — two of the biggest players in the streaming-box game — any time soon. A Roku spokesperson told Engadget, “Roku’s core focus is delivering the best streaming-TV experience. Currently there are no plans to serve as a central hub for the connected home.” And while people seem to expect the Apple TV to become a connected HomeKit hub, in reality, it’s just an access point to Apple’s secure iCloud service. In fact, Apple introduced the HAP (HomeKit Accessory Protocol) over iCloud at WWDC so hardware developers could create their own secure connection to iCloud without the use of an Apple TV.
Roku or Apple could change their mind. It’s happened before with Apple. Or other hardware makers (Google, TiVo, Amazon) could step up and tackle the problem. But if they don’t, this leaves a huge opportunity for cable companies (organizations that don’t tend to have many fans) to swoop in and control the connected home. Imagine Comcast being in charge of your lighting and connected appliances. Yeah, it’s a scary thought. But more and more connected devices are being introduced without a way to truly connect them all. It would be a substantial coup if cable companies save the day while tech giants are still trying to figure out which networking protocol to support.
But, like the tech companies, there are no immediate plans from cable operators to help solve the fragmented IoT mess. However, Alticast Director of Product Management Susan Crouse points out that CableLabs is working to aggregate the competing protocols. So the work is being done; it’s up to some company to seize the opportunity to make IoT less of a headache without adding another one-trick-pony device to a home network. And if it ends up being a cable company, I’ll begrudgingly pony up a few extra bucks a month to make my home more like The Jetsons.
In the meantime, we’ll continue to open one app to turn off our lights and launch another to set the temperature in our homes — because, so far, the future is a home connected to apps and not to itself.
[Photo credit: AP Photo/Matt Rourke, file (Cable box)]
Filed under: Misc, Peripherals
Watch the extended ‘Uncharted 4’ demo at 11am PT on Twitch
Fans of the Nathan Drake saga are going to want to tune in to Twitch at 11 am Pacific today. Naughty Dog has announced that it will stream the extended E3 press conference demo of Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End.
Filed under: Internet
Source: NaughtyDog (Twitch)
Disney Infinity might make its way to Microsoft’s HoloLens
It’s only natural for an entertainment corporation as massive as The Walt Disney Company, with IP holdings that span the likes of Pixar, Marvel and Lucasfilm, to be exploring the potential of virtual reality. It’s something John Vignocchi, VP of Production at Disney Interactive, the division behind toys-to-life platform Disney Infinity, confirmed when we chatted a few weeks back. But when it comes to Infinity, the future focus seems to be weighted more towards augmented reality. “We’ve had multiple meetings and discussions with Oculus; multiple meetings and discussions with Sony about Morpheus; multiple meetings and discussions with Microsoft about HoloLens. We’re very interested in that space,” Vignocchi said. “There’s the socialization problem right now with VR, but augmented reality is very exciting.”
The issue of isolation in VR isn’t new. It’s a hurdle Sony PlayStation addressed onstage during its E3 presentation last month and one Worldwide Studio head Shuhei Yoshida is determined to overcome with a range of new Morpheus demos (see: RIGS). But despite the inroads being made towards socializing VR gameplay, Disney Interactive head John Blackburn remains unconvinced it’s the way forward for the local co-op baked into the family-friendly Infinity.
“My own experience with these devices right now is that I feel like they almost cut directly against what we’re trying to do which is experiences that can involve you with somebody else,” Blackburn said. “…The idea of kind of creating that family memory and playing it together is really core to the experience we’re trying to build. And so when you put a lot of these headsets on, it’s almost isolating in a way. Until we can get over that piece of the technology, it’s not as interesting to me.”
Which is why Blackburn hinted that if infinity were to pick a side in the VR vs AR battle, it’d likely come out as a HoloLens project. And when you consider the parallels between the crafting of Infinity‘s Toy Box creation mode and Microsoft’s recently announced HoloLens Minecraft project, the prospect doesn’t seem too far-fetched. Though, that’s not to say Disney Interactive’s completely ruling out VR.
“You kind of look at Microsoft’s HoloLens stuff where you can kind of see through,” said Blackburn. “And that one’s kind of interesting from that perspective because I can see everybody else around me. But yes, we’re absolutely interested in that space because the toybox itself is kind of a very interesting concept of ‘I’m in the world I built.’
Snapchat’s ‘tap to view’ takes your fingers off the screen
Snapchat announced a host of new features for its messaging app on Wednesday. The biggest change is the new “tap to view” feature that, as the name implies, allows users to simply tap the screen to play a video or story rather than continuously press and hold. Additionally, Snapchat now offers two-factor authentication, which you should enable right now. The app has also rejiggered the ways you can add friends. The new Add Nearby function will allow groups of people in close proximity to add one another to their friends list en masse while the addition of a selfie into the center of your snapcode lets people immediately know it’s you.
[Image Credit: shutterstock]
Filed under: Internet
Source: Snapchat
New LG G4 promotion gets you a free battery, charging cradle, and leather backing through July in the US
LG hasn’t been shy about prodding your temptation to buy their G4. The flagship’s initial promotion included an extra battery and microSD card, and even received an extension to run until the end of June. But now that it has ended, LG is quick to renew the deal and see if another goody might get you to make the leap.
The new promotion still includes a free battery and charging cradle, but forgoes the microSD card for a leather back cover. You get to choose between five different colors for the leather: light sky blue, orange, pink, yellow, or red.
How it works is after you purchase a G4 (between July 1st and July 31st), submit your purchase details to LG (at least by Aug. 14th) and they will mail you the extras, within 4-6 weeks. You must purchase your G4 from ‘participating’ retailers in the US, which does include the major carriers and common stores.
If you’re into leather back covers, did LG’s new promotion just strike a chord? You have a month to decide.
Source: LG
The post New LG G4 promotion gets you a free battery, charging cradle, and leather backing through July in the US appeared first on AndroidGuys.
New LG G4 promo includes free leather back and second battery

Back in June, LG gave US residents a really good incentive to purchase the LG G4. They were giving away a free 32GB microSD card, an extra battery, and a battery charging cradle. At first the offer was only available until June 21 but then LG extended it to the end of June. Don’t worry if you missed that offer because there is a new one.
LG will give you a free premium leather back for your G4 and a second battery with charging cradle. The offer is open throughout July to anyone living in the US, and all submissions must be received by LG by August 14. LG is giving you two methods of submission: online or mail-in.
Before you submit, you’ll need to gather a few things that LG will use to verify the legitimacy of your purchase. You will need to provide them with a copy of your receipt, and a picture of your box showing the IMEI number. Then comes the difficult part: as they make you choose between a light sky blue, orange, pink, yellow, or red leather backing. You can become eligible for the offer by purchasing the G4 from major carriers as well as authorized retailers. Will this offer make you more inclined to purchase the LG G4? Let us know in the comments.
Redeem your incentive here!
LG G4 S leak: renders of a slightly-lesser flagship
When it was announced a few months ago, the LG G4 attracted both its fair share of praise and punishment. As our team found however, the device was every bit the flagship we expected, though according to some reports sales have been less than originally projected. Now it seems LG is keen on offering a slightly-stymied follow-up in the form of the LG G4 S, at least as a new leak would lead us to believe:
Despite the visual similarity to the G4, the source asserts that the G4 S will step down from a QHD, 5.5-inch screen to a more standard 5.2-inch, FHD display instead, with In-Cell Touch technology included. Also taking a lower seat to its big brother is the rear camera, which will be only 8-megapixels (though laser autofocus and dual-LED flash are present) and an unknown 1.5GHz octa-core processor for the CPU.
It is unknown for which markets this lower-end G4 will be aimed at, assuming the leak is legitimate, as it is if there will be an assortment of premium back covers a la the luxurious leather on the standard G4. At the very least it’s curious that LG might opt for a CPU of even “lower” status than the controversial decision it made to include the Snapdragon 808 (as opposed to the 810) in the flagship-proper. The phone is said to launch in the second half of July.
LG G4
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
Would you consider buying the G4 S if it comes in at a much lower price point than it’s sibling? Would the spec decreases be too much to put up with, or are they more than enough for most modern needs? Leave us a comment below with your thoughts.




















