Skip to content

Archive for

9
Apr

Google said to be close to getting Android Wear watches to work with iPhones


Sure, the Apple Watch is just around the corner, but that’s not going to stop Google from continuing work on getting Android Wear to work with iOS.

It’s been rumored and reported for a while now that Google was working to get Android Wear to be properly compatible with the iPhone, and it appears that they’re rapidly approaching the point of actually seeing a release.

9
Apr

How to retouch images in Photos for OS X


Ever taken a really great photo only to notice a small blemish or distracting object after the fact?

We’ve all done it. Luckily, retouching a photo is a lot easier than going and retaking it. Photos for OS X offers a retouch tool that lets you quickly remove small imperfections such as skin blemishes, and even a small object that wasn’t supposed to be in the image to begin with. It may not be as powerful as spot healing tools in software editing programs such as Photoshop, but in a pinch, it gets the job done!

How to quickly retouch an image in the Photos app on your Mac

  1. Launch the Photos app on your Mac running OS X Yosemite or newer.
  2. Find the photo you need to retouch and open it.
  3. Click on the Edit button in the upper right hand corner.
  4. Select Retouch in right hand menu.
  5. You can zoom into your image using the zoom tool in the top menu if you need to.
  6. Adjust the size of the retouch tool in the right hand menu if you need to.
  7. Click on the area that you need to retouch. If it’s a larger area, you can click and drag as well.
  8. You also have the option of holding down the option key on your keyboard and clicking to select a pattern. You can the area you’d like to match that target and it will be applied
  9. If you ever need to Undo a retouch, just hit Command + Z on your keyboard to step back.
  10. When you’re happy with the results, click Done in the upper right hand corner.

9
Apr

HERE suite updated with bug fixes for sign-in and favorites sync issues


The HERE suite on Windows Phone has been updated today, bringing fixes for HERE account sign-in issues and other bug fixes to HERE Drive+, HERE Maps, HERE Transit, and HERE City Lens.

9
Apr

Waltr for Mac lets you drag-and-drop Flash video files and more onto your iPhone


Waltr, a Mac app that lets you drag-and-drop multiple file formats such as MKV and FLAC onto your iPhone or iPad, has received a large update, adding full subtitle support and new format compatibility.

In addition to MKV and FLAC, Waltr supports MP3, MP4, AVI, CUE, WMA, M4R, AAC, M4V, M4A, and ALAC, many of which aren’t supported in iTunes. Waltr will load these files directly into your iPhone’s native Music and Video apps. With version 1.5, the app adds support for several new formats, including FLV, MPEG, and WEBM for video, and AIFF, WAV, and OGG for audio.

Also supported in this version are SRT and ASS subtitle files. The app also features a retouched design, and the developer has said that automatic metadata, Wi-Fi transfer, and picture support are all in the works.

You can download Waltr for free with a 14-day trial, after which you can purchase a license for $29.95.

9
Apr

How to use an external editor with Photos for OS X


If you’re more comfortable in Photoshop, Pixelmator, Acorn, or another image editor, your instinct might immediately be to ‘Edit with…”

That way you way you don’t have to worry about photo-specific workflows, you can get right down to nudging pixels. Apple’s new Photos for OS X, however, doesn’t include support for external editors, at least not yet. So, if you really want to move your images out of Photos and into your favorite image editor for Mac, what can you do?

The answer is to manually round-tip them.

That’s because not only is there now “Edit with…” option in Photos for OS X, currently you can’t even drag directly from Photos and into another editor. You have to save out, open in, save out, and open back. It’s inefficient, absolutely, but if there’s a filter, effect, or pixel-level edit you can only make in an external editor, it’s the only way to get it done. For now, at least.

How to move an image out of Photos and into Photoshop, Pixelmator, Acorn, or other external editor

  1. Click on the photo you want to edit.
  2. Go to the File > Export > Export Unmodified Original menu item. (If you don’t care about the highest quality possible, you can simply drag and drop the photo to your desktop.)
  3. Save the photo to your desktop.
  4. From your desktop, drag the photo into your favorite image editor. (Or control/right click the icon and choose “Open with…” and then your favorite image editor.)

How to bring and edited image back into Photos for OS X

  1. Save or Export the edited image back to your desktop.
  2. From your desktop, drag the image back into Photos for OS X. (Or choose the File > Import menu item and then select the image to import.)

<!–*/

<!–*/

<!–*/

.devicebox
background-color: #5CB8DB;
border: 1px solid #E2E9EB;
float: right;
display: block;
margin: 0 0px 10px 10px;
max-width: 350px;
overflow: hidden;
width: 50%;

.devicebox h3
background: #8D98BD;
font-family: “camptonmedium”,sans-serif;
font-size: 20px;
margin-bottom: 0;
margin-top: 0;
padding: 0;
text-align: center;

.devicebox h3 a
display: block;
line-height: 30px;
padding: 0 10px;

.devicebox h3 a:hover
background: #7e88aa;
text-decoration: none;

.devicebox .video
margin: auto;

.devicebox p,
.entry-content .devicebox p > img,
.devicebox img
margin: 0px;
max-width: 100%;
padding: 0px;

div .devicebox *,
div .devicebox li,
div .devicebox a:active,
div .devicebox a:hover,
div .devicebox a:link,
div .devicebox a:visited
color: #fff;

.devicebox a:hover
text-decoration: underline;

.devicebox p,
.devicebox ul li,
.devicebox ol li
font-size: 16px;
padding: initial;

.devicebox ul
margin: 0;
padding: 0.5em 1em 1em 30px;

.devicebox ul li
display: list-item;
line-height: 24px;
list-style: disc outside none;

.devicebox ul li:before
display: none;

.devicebox p ~ p
padding: 0px 15px 15px;
line-height: 1.25;

.devicebox p:first-of-type + p
padding: 15px;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox
float: none;
margin: 0 auto 30px;
max-width: 700px;
min-height: 225px;
position: relative;
width: 100%;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox .video,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox .video
bottom: 0px;
left: 50%;
position: absolute;
right: 0px;
top: 30px;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox .video_iframe,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox .video_iframe
height: 100%;
padding: 0px;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox h3 + p,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox h3 + p
bottom: 0;
left: 50%;
overflow: hidden;
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 30px;
width: 50%

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox h3 + p img,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox h3 + p img
float: right;
height: 100%;
width: auto;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox ul,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox ul,
div *:last-of-type + .devicebox p,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox p
width: 43%;

@media all and (max-width: 500px)
.devicebox
float: none;
margin: 0 0 30px;
max-width: 100%;
width: 100%;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox .video,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox .video
left: 0;
position: relative;
top: 0;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox .video_iframe,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox .video_iframe
padding-bottom: 56.25%;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox h3 + p,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox h3 + p
left: 0;
position: relative;
top: 0;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox ul,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox ul
width: auto;

/*–>*/

/*–>*/

/*–>*/

9
Apr

Apple Watch and accessibility: First look


Apple’s message that Apple Watch is “the most personal and intimate device we’ve ever created” resonates with me in two ways.

First, regarding the Apple Watch as an object, as a timepiece and fashion accessory: It’s been years since I regularly wore a watch, but Apple Watch is pushing to change that. From everything I’ve seen and heard about the watch, I would be thrilled to wear it every day. As with Apple’s other products, the watch seemingly strikes a good balance of form and function. Secondly, the Watch as a device — how it works and how one interacts with it — is bound to have far-reaching effects on users with disabilities. As a person with visual and motor delays, I’ve wondered myself how accessible the Watch will be, especially in context of the size of watch displays.

Ever since Apple unveiled the Watch last September, I’ve heard from many in the accessibility community who have expressed trepidation in their enthusiasm for the watch. The common refrain is that the usability story of it for, say, a blind person is unknown. As I said, we with special needs need reasonable assurance that Apple Watch will be usable, particularly in light of the introduction of the digital crown and Taptic Engine.

I met with Apple for a hands-on briefing of the watch and its accessibility features. My aim with this article is to run down what’s available on Apple Watch, accessibility-wise, as well as share a few observations I have on their potential impact on watch wearers.

The accessibility of WatchOS

Apple Watch borrows numerous accessibility options from iOS. They include:

  • VoiceOver
  • Large Dynamic Type
  • Extra Large Watch Face
  • Reduce Motion
  • Reduce Transparency
  • Zoom
  • Grayscale
  • Mono Audio
  • Bold Text
  • On/Off Labels
  • Accessibility Shortcut

That’s a lot of bullet points, but I’m glad to know the Watch supports so much out of the box. In general, the features that were demoed to me (VoiceOver and Reduce Motion were but two) work more or less the same way they do on iOS, albeit on a much smaller canvas. The watch’s accessibility features are available on the device itself and on the companion Apple Watch app for iPhone.

It’s worth noting that Apple feels the Taptic Engine — a new form of physical feedback that feels akin to a tap on the wrist — is a feature that will be very beneficial to those who are deaf or hard of hearing. I agree. As I wrote for MacStories about the accessibility ramifications of haptic feedback on users with disabilities, Apple’s embrace of this technology is profound because it will help someone with a hearing loss, for example, become more aware of what’s happening on his or her watch by supplementing the audio stimulus with a tactile one. (Just like an doorbell or telephone for the hearing impaired is equipped with a flashing light to indicate ringing. The phone still rings like normal, but it also simultaneously flashes.)

There are two accessibility features of the Apple Watch that stand out to me: Extra Large Watch Face and Zoom. Regarding the Large Watch Face, it does what it says: shows the time in a ginormous font. It’s very well done, although for my needs, I’m confident that I can get by just as well with Large Dynamic Type. Overall, however, Large Watch Face will be great for those who need the clock to be extra big in order to read it. Likewise, the Zoom feature was helpful for me in identifying icons on the Home screen, as they’re a tad small at normal size. I found that Zoom works best for me using the digital crown, as the two-finger pan was more difficult to do using my partially-paralyzed right hand (caused by my cerebral palsy).

The Apple Watch app

The Apple Watch app is yet another one of those unintentional accessibility wins — it’s a great accessibility tool.

As I mentioned above, the Apple Watch’s accessibility features are available both on the device and in the Apple Watch app. Since the watch and the iPhone talk with each other, it’s possible to, for instance, turn on Grayscale in the app and have it instantly enabled on the watch. This is important for a couple reasons.

The first, most obvious, reason is that the watch app is running on a big screen. Especially for a person with low vision, it’s so much easier to fiddle with the Accessibility settings on the iPhone than it is on the watch. The same applies to organizing Home screen icons, setting friends for Digital Touch, and more. It saves on squinting, which ultimately saves on eye fatigue and strain.

The second reason is one of dexterity. My fine-motor mobility isn’t the greatest, especially on my right side. I’d much rather complete the “housekeeping duties” for the watch in the app than on the device. My fingers have more room to move, and the margin for error (missed taps, etc) is lesser on the phone.

Of course, the Apple Watch app benefits the fully-abled too. Apple made a smart design decision to offload much of the grunt work to the phone. Not only does it relieve the watch of technical stress, but even those with 20/20 vision and impeccable fine-motor skills can appreciate not having to exclusively navigate such a small display.

The Apple Watch

  • I got an opportunity to try on an Apple Watch. Despite being left-handed, I prefer wearing watches on my left wrist, for two reasons. (1) my left side is strongest, so I have more movement and muscle strength in my arm; and (2) as well, my left eye is strongest, and I felt more comfortable viewing the watch with my dominant eye. I realize the convention is to wear a watch on the opposite hand (from the hand with which one writes), but this feels most comfortable to me.

  • The digital crown is a lot easier to move than I anticipated. There’s a fluidity to it that makes it easy to turn even with the slightest touch of my finger. A definite lubriciousness to it. By contrast, I’ve always had trouble with traditional crowns on watches, since it takes more force to turn being that they’re not nearly as lubricious as the watch’s digital crown.

  • One of the questions I’ve had surrounding the watch is how easily someone with motor delays would be able to unfasten and re-fasten the various bands. The watch I saw had a white Sport band, and I was pleasantly surprised at how easy the so-called “pin-and-tuck” method is to manipulate. I had no issues taking it on or off, nor with adjusting the fit. I’m very interested to find out how something like the Modern Buckle or Milanese Loop works in this context, especially since the loop bands (Leather, too) use magnets.

The beginning

As I said at the outset, what you see here is just an overview of Apple Watch’s accessibility. The real test will come, of course, when I get a chance to live with the Watch for a while. I’m very much looking forward to assimilating the Watch into my daily life.

<!–*/

<!–*/

<!–*/

.devicebox
background-color: #5CB8DB;
border: 1px solid #E2E9EB;
float: right;
display: block;
margin: 0 0px 10px 10px;
max-width: 350px;
overflow: hidden;
width: 50%;

.devicebox h3
background: #8D98BD;
font-family: “camptonmedium”,sans-serif;
font-size: 20px;
margin-bottom: 0;
margin-top: 0;
padding: 0;
text-align: center;

.devicebox h3 a
display: block;
line-height: 30px;
padding: 0 10px;

.devicebox h3 a:hover
background: #7e88aa;
text-decoration: none;

.devicebox .video
margin: auto;

.devicebox p,
.entry-content .devicebox p > img,
.devicebox img
margin: 0px;
max-width: 100%;
padding: 0px;

div .devicebox *,
div .devicebox li,
div .devicebox a:active,
div .devicebox a:hover,
div .devicebox a:link,
div .devicebox a:visited
color: #fff;

.devicebox a:hover
text-decoration: underline;

.devicebox p,
.devicebox ul li,
.devicebox ol li
font-size: 16px;
padding: initial;

.devicebox ul
margin: 0;
padding: 0.5em 1em 1em 30px;

.devicebox ul li
display: list-item;
line-height: 24px;
list-style: disc outside none;

.devicebox ul li:before
display: none;

.devicebox p ~ p
padding: 0px 15px 15px;
line-height: 1.25;

.devicebox p:first-of-type + p
padding: 15px;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox
float: none;
margin: 0 auto 30px;
max-width: 700px;
min-height: 225px;
position: relative;
width: 100%;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox .video,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox .video
bottom: 0px;
left: 50%;
position: absolute;
right: 0px;
top: 30px;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox .video_iframe,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox .video_iframe
height: 100%;
padding: 0px;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox h3 + p,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox h3 + p
bottom: 0;
left: 50%;
overflow: hidden;
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 30px;
width: 50%

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox h3 + p img,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox h3 + p img
float: right;
height: 100%;
width: auto;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox ul,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox ul,
div *:last-of-type + .devicebox p,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox p
width: 43%;

@media all and (max-width: 500px)
.devicebox
float: none;
margin: 0 0 30px;
max-width: 100%;
width: 100%;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox .video,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox .video
left: 0;
position: relative;
top: 0;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox .video_iframe,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox .video_iframe
padding-bottom: 56.25%;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox h3 + p,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox h3 + p
left: 0;
position: relative;
top: 0;

div *:last-of-type + .devicebox ul,
div *:last-of-type + div ~ .devicebox ul
width: auto;

/*–>*/

/*–>*/

/*–>*/

9
Apr

Intel ‘reference’ based tablets promise Nexus-fast Android updates, but would you buy one?


intel android logo mwc 2015

Back in September, we first learned of the Intel Reference Design for Android program, which aimed to create a set of standardized components, centered around an Intel Atom processor, which OEMs could apply to their own tablets and smartphones. The idea was that having set, compatible specs would make it easier than ever to rollout Android updates, with Intel promising that IRDA devices would get new Android updates in as little as two weeks after Google released the code to developers.

Devices based on Intel’s IRDA program will get new Android updates in as little as two weeks after Google released the code to developers.

Fast-forwarding to today, only two devices (that we’re aware of at least) are built on the IRDA platform. First, there’s the German-based TrekStor xintron i 7.0. And more recently, there’s a 7-inch tablet from a Philippine company called Cloudfone. While that’s certainly a modest start, Intel promises that many other OEMs are working on IRDA-based tablets such as smaller players like ECS, ChipHD, and Malata. Unfortunately, none of the bigger OEMs have signed up just yet. Of course, this could change.

Lenovo and Dell are just two well known brands that tend to favor Intel chips for their tablets. If either of these brands jump onboard the IRDA program, this could be a big win for Intel while also giving Lenovo or Dell the advantage of lightening quick updates. The big question though is whether consumers would be willing to embrace x86 processors from Intel, even if Intel is able to make good on its promise of super fast Android updates. After all, ARM processors have a more established rep in the Android world, and while Intel processors actually play relatively nice with Android these days, compatibility issues can still sometimes arise for certain apps.

So how about it, if Google and Intel could deliver 2 to 3 week update turn-arounds for Intel-based tablets — would you pick one up? Or would you rather stick to ARM, even if odds are you won’t get nearly as quick of updates unless you go the Nexus route?

// <![CDATA[
(function ()
document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(opst);
());
// ]]>

206
9
Apr

TSMC announces plans for compact 16nm and 10nm manufacturing


ARM Silicon CPU SoC HiSilicon-1

TSMC has announced a compact, lower-power version of its upcoming 16nm FinFET manufacturing process and has revealed details about its roadmap to even smaller process nodes. With Samsung ramping up production of its 14nm Exynos processor, TSMC is looking to forge ahead with its 10nm fabrication next year.

The Taiwanese semiconductor company is expected to ramp up 16nm FinFET production this summer, to begin competing with smaller manufacturing nodes offered by rivals Samsung and Intel. This is particularly important for mobile, where low-power and cooler chip footprints are becoming increasingly important as processor speeds increase. The foundry will have more than 50 tape-outs by year’s end, covering applications processors, GPUs, automotive and network processors, according to TSMC president and co-CEO Mark Liu.

TSMC’s compact version of 16nm FinFET is known as 16FFC and is designed for mid-to-low-end smartphones, wearables and other consumer electronics. The process aims to reduce power consumption by a further 50 percent and should make the company’s factories more appealing for low-power chip designs, especially in the mobile space.

Following that, TSMC is targeting 10nm manufacturing, with construction of its fab scheduled to begin next year. TSMC suggests that its 10nm process will have 2.1 times the logic density of 16nm, resulting in a 20 percent speed improvement and 40 percent power reduction.

“We think 10nm will be the long-lasting technology node and for TSMC to be accelerating 10nm, I think that is a very good sign for the industry,” – International Business Solutions CEO Handel Jones

TSMC’s 10nm production is expected to be ready near the end of 2016. The company has previously announced a collaboration with ARM to bring the ARMv8-A processor IP to TSMC’s future 10nm FinFET manufacturing process and suggests that more than 10 partnerships are in the works.

While Samsung may be TSMC’s immediate competition in the mobile space, the race to 10nm will see the company competing directly with the industry leader – Intel. Samsung is also working on 10nm technology, but a manufacturing timetable has not been announced. Intel’s 10nm production is expected to ramp up in the next 12 to 18 months, putting the two head to head by the start of 2017, providing that development remains on schedule.

85
9
Apr

Japan’s best smartphone is hiding an “awful” secret (hint: it’s Korean)


IMAG0002_1

A collection of Galaxy devices from an NTT docomo store in Nakano, Tokyo.

Yesterday, April 9th, Japanese mobile carriers have finally announced the release of the Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge. This potent pair of products have been off the radar from all carriers with only Samsung itself having posted bare minimal PR information on its website. As if the consumer apathy isn’t apparent enough, Japan stands to receive arguably the most abridged line-up of all, while trying desperately to hide the fact that a Korean company, has made the product: Samsung’s name has been absolutely stripped from the device, front and back, right down to the promotional materials.

Two carriers will offer Samsung’s latest and greatest, but only one will carry both the Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge. Neither will sell a device in a 128GB storage option.

  • NTT docomo, the largest carrier, has announced the pair, however the line up itself is significantly stymied. The S6 will be available exclusively in a 32GB storage option, and only in Gold and Black color variants. The S6 Edge in turn, will be available exclusively in a 64GB option, in Gold and Green coloring only.
  • KDDI au, on the other hand, will be releasing only the Galaxy S6 Edge, with either 32GB or 64GB of storage, and in Black, White, or Gold colors.

Suffice to say, this lack of choice in storage size, coloring, and even standard design is a bit disappointing. All the more so given that docomo’s questionable parring of Edge color options are decidedly not to everyone’s liking.

Subjugating Samsung

Both carriers have removed all traces of the Samsung name, something which KDDI has done before but is new for docomo, which typically left the Samsung logo on the rear cover, despite reduced visibility. Let’s explore, beginning with the beginning:

docomo Galaxy Box

In the beginning… docomo wasn’t exactly trying to outright hide the fact that Samsung made the Galaxy S.

The Focus

In truth, this is a rather puzzling reality that arguably began when NTT docomo released the original Galaxy S in November 2010: the Samsung logo wasn’t hidden but it was removed from the front entirely and moved to the lower half of the rear.

docomo_galaxy_s_white

While the front face contained the docomo logo as per most devices, the back cover offered Samsung’s as well, though pushed to the bottom.

Now take a look at what had happen as of Summer 2014: no carrier logo at all on the front, and absolutely no Samsung logo period. From the KDDI au variant of the Galaxy S5:

Galaxy S5 KDDI au

The KDDI au Galaxy S5 line up: the first Samsung phone released in Japan without any carrier branding on the front whatsoever. The Samsung logo is also missing from the rear, as it was on the NTT docomo variant.

Curiously the NTT docomo variant opted to keep the carrier logo on the front and left the Samsung logo on the back side, though it was extremely small.

gsmarena_001

Now take a gander at the Galaxy S6 Edge. This next screen capture comes via Samsung UK’s product page:

スクリーンショット (39)

Samsung UK’s product page for the Galaxy S6 Edge. Note the prominent branding on the front and back of the device.

And now Japan. Here is the front of the device with the KDDI au variant pictured. See the caption for details:

スクリーンショット (35)

The front of the device is devoid of anything for KDDI au (pictured), but for NTT docomo will have the carrier’s logo under the earpiece.

Here we have the rear side. I have specifically chosen the docomo variant as NTT had previously left Samsung’s logo, despite it being relegated to a lower positioning and smaller text. It is nowhere to be seen here, rather the word “Galaxy” is present. Bizarrely enough the Qi wireless charging logo appears.

スクリーンショット (37)

Here we have the backside, which contains not a mention of Samsung, yet has the word “Galaxy” and even the Qi logo.

As if this wasn’t odd enough, Samsung’s logo appears absolutely nowhere in NTT docomo’s 32-page product booklet for the S6 and S6 Edge. In fact, the company’s name doesn’t even appear until page 29 and 30, where it’s used for legal reasons. For all intents and purposes, “Galaxy” might as well be the manufacturer. This is indeed what Samsung appears to be doing however, as a customer representative from the company, Retsu Segawa, mentioned the desire to focus on the brand name when contacted earlier this year.

Galaxy S6 Japan 3

Try as you might, not a single Samsung logo is anywhere in sight.

Jaded with Japan

Behind the scenes, there is the underlying pretense that Japan, as a collective, is unwilling to accept the fact that Korea has surpassed it in terms of mobile technology. This extends to the deployed network infrastructure, wherein Japan is just now getting Category 6 LTE, something that South Korea had almost a year ago.

This is absolutely shocking given that NTT docomo was the first carrier in the world to deploy 3G network infrastructure and for ages Japan’s feature phone market was light-years beyond anything the outside world could even comprehend: NFC was introduced over a decade ago, 1SEG wireless digital TV broadcasting had been a staple from around the same time, and Japan had access to full-featured mobile e-mail services whereas the world-at-large had to make due with SMS and MMS.

Arguably, there is not a single domestically produced piece of hardware that has specs comparable with Samsung’s Galaxy. This is especially true of display technology, where Korea has not only made significant use of OLED panels, but has for the past year been curving them. Meanwhile, companies like Sony continue to rely on LCD technology; at least Sharp has made some progress with the development of its IGZO display technology. Despite all this, we have the following:

Apple-Japan-Nov-2014 Counterpoint

Fujitsu has a larger amount of market share than Samsung. Sharp arguably does as well. Sony has over double that. This jaw dropping astonishment is actually par-for-course in Japan, where it’s quite common to hear things like “I buy Sony because it’s Japanese.” Ironically even Japan’s patriotism doesn’t seem to hold much water when it comes to the iPhone however, with Apple once again dominating.

Wrap up

Japan is, for better or worse, a rather xenophobic country. This is largely, if not entirely, based on the fact that as a collection of islands, it’s therefore isolated. While the people here may indeed love foreign things such as Hollywood movies, American TV shows, French food, German medical practices and so on, with technology things have been largely a domestic affair. Given the unrivaled dominance of companies like Sony, Panasonic, Sharp, Toshiba, and NEC during the 80’s, 90’s and even part of the 00’s, this makes sense.

With that said, it is a bit frustrating to see the manner in which Samsung is being treated here. The company should be proud to offer such a fantastic product as the Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge, yet instead its being made to hide behind its own branding. Can’t we all just… get along?



9
Apr

Early Galaxy S6 sales almost double the Galaxy S5’s, says T-Mobile


samsung galaxy s6 edge unboxing aa (19 of 20)

The Galaxy S6 could become Samsung’s most popular flagship smartphone yet, according to analyst forecasts and early sales indications from T-Mobile. The US carrier says that sales of the Galaxy S6 are already “nearly double” those of the Galaxy S5 during the first 10 days.

The Galaxy S5 is currently T-Mobile’s best-selling Galaxy flagship smartphone, but globally that title belongs to the Galaxy S4, which sold around 45 million units in its first year. Analysts are expecting that the Galaxy S6 may exceed that figure in its first year, partly due to overwhelming positive reviews.

A strong launch for the Galaxy S6 series is exactly what Samsung needs if it wants to improve upon its declining quarterly profits this year. Although we will have to see if the temporary limited available of the Galaxy S6 Edge will have any impact on Samsung’s second quarter sales figure.

T-Mobile also stated that HTC One M9 sales surpassed those of the One M8 during its first 10 day period, but the handset doesn’t appear to have seen the same leap in popularity as Samsung’s latest flagship.

Technically, the Samsung Galaxy S6 doesn’t launch until tomorrow, but T-Mobile is including pre-orders in its figures. What’s more, it’s likely that Galaxy S6 sales could reach even higher numbers when it becomes publicly available in stores on April 10th.