Skip to content

September 28, 2014

Science shows why real space battles would be more Asteroids than Star Wars

by John_A

X-Wings and Y-Wings at Star Wars' Battle of Yavin

You’re probably aware that most sci-fi space battles aren’t realistic. The original Star Wars‘ Death Star scene was based on a World War II movie, for example. But have you wondered what it would really be like to duke it out in the void? PBS is more than happy to explain in its latest It’s Okay To Be Smart video. As you’ll see below, Newtonian physics would dictate battles that are more like Asteroids than the latest summer blockbuster. You’d need to thrust every time you wanted to change direction, and projectiles would trump lasers (which can’t focus at long distances); you wouldn’t hear any sound, either.

For that matter, even close-up combat might not happen. Given the sheer distances and the limits of the speed of light, it might look more like classic naval warfare, which was defined by limited ship-to-ship communication and long-range shots based on estimates. It wouldn’t make for riveting entertainment, then, but that’s fine — despite the name, sci-fi is more about telling a good story than maintaining absolute realism.

Filed under: , ,


Via: Geeks Are Sexy, Neatorama, Gizmodo

Source: It’s Okay To Be Smart (YouTube)

.CPlase_panel display:none;

Read more from News

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

%d bloggers like this: