Galaxy S6 Edge battery life review – 28 days later

The Galaxy S6 Edge may tick a lot of boxes, but on paper, there’s at least one area where Samsung’s curved flagship could be undone: the battery life. The handset is powered by a 2600 mAh battery and unlike past Samsung devices, it’s not removable.
Samsung claims the handset will survive an entire day in the right conditions, but just how good is the battery life? Since the handset launched on April 10th, I’ve been testing the battery life; I’ve already shared my first experience followed by an update a few days later but now it’s time to look back at the past four weeks and answer the real question everyone has been asking – just how long can you expect the battery to last?
My initial experience with the battery life was that, like with most smartphones, the first few days can be misleading. At first it lasted 14 hours, then dropped rapidly to 8 hours as soon as the brightness was turned up then rose up to just shy of 24 hours as the screen brightness was reduced. So for this piece I am trying to give you a better idea of what the average battery life on the S6 Edge is.
Average battery life
When considering how best to determine the average battery life, I thought about how the average consumer – i.e. the mass market, which is Samsung’s target market – would use the handset. From my knowledge, this often means using their phone in the morning and on the way to work, at lunch and then after work, through until the end of the day.
Average of 14 to 18 hours battery life
Using this average use case an example, the Galaxy S6 Edge average battery life is 14 to 18 hours battery life with screen auto brightness set to between 40 and 60 percent. Now this includes between 3 and 4 hours of screen-on-time (a topic I’ll touch on below) and various email accounts, information streams and social networks syncing all day.
There’s one big issue with the Galaxy S6 Edge though: using the handset for gaming or video playback does drain the battery. I’ve found that watching a movie for two hours at full brightness can use 35 percent of your battery or more. This reduces average total battery life to 13 hours, which wouldn’t be enough in our average use case.
As another use case, I’ve found that on days where I’ve been spending days at events and sharing images on social media, the battery life has been significantly worse. In fact, all camera usage results in lower battery life as opening the camera automatically puts the handset at full brightness. This was definitely a problem during the recent trip to Malta for the IFA 2015 GPC but one potential solution to this is Quick Charge-enabled portable chargers.
Screen on time
I mentioned screen on time and this leads me to a debate that appeared on the most recent FDP episode of the AA podcast. As we discussed, screen on time is highly subjective and often a number that gets branded about without being clearly explained. From my experience, an average screen on time of 3 to 4 hours on the S6 Edge is satisfactory from a full day’s use as I don’t spend the entire day on my handset.
If you happen to use your display more often, I’ve found that an increase in screen on time to between four and five hours will reduce the overall battery life by about three hours. If you increase the brightness to full brightness but keep auto brightness on, the total battery life drops to an average of between 14 and 16 hours while full brightness can halve the total battery life or worse.
.rvs_wrapper
width: 335px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
#page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
Wrap up
The battery life on the Galaxy S6 Edge has certainly been interesting, and, as a Samsung user, the lack of removable battery was always going to be a challenge. Yet it’s proved easier to handle that I thought mainly due to Quick Charging, which has meant I can charge the handset quickly when I need to.
While I’ve been testing the battery life, there have been times where I couldn’t charge overnight and I’d wake up with nowhere near enough for a full day. This is where Quick Charging comes in; a 30-minute charge can add up to 50 percent to the battery life, while you can charge to full in 80 minutes or less.
Yes it’s certainly not perfect and yes, it won’t be good enough for everyone, but, for me, I’m willing to make the small sacrifice of battery life for the other positives – and there’s a lot of them – of the S6 Edge. If this average battery life won’t work for you, luckily not all OEMs have dropped removable batteries and the LG G4 is probably the best alternative to the Galaxy S6 Edge.
Let us know your thoughts. What’s your average battery life and screen on time from your experience so far?
China’s smartphone market reaching saturation as Apple takes top spot

A new smartphone market share report says that smartphone shipments in China fell 4.3 per cent in the first quarter compared with a year ago. Since 2011 China has been the world’s largest smartphone market and was in many ways a green field sector. Most people buying smartphones in China have, until now, been first time buyers. But now it seems that the market has reached saturation and from here in China is now an upgrade market.
The new numbers come from research conducted by International Data Corp (IDC). Other, rival surveys, suggest that China’s smartphone market continued to grow during the quarter, but at much slower levels than previously. Either way, it is clear that this is a turning point.
![]()
According to Apple’s financial results for Q1 2015, the Cupertino company sells more iPhone in China than it does in the USA. Now, the new data shows that Apple has pushed Xiaomi off the top spot to become China’s largest smartphone maker by market share. It was IDC that ranked Xiaomi as the top smartphone OEM in China for Q4 2014, with the company taking a 13.7% market share. At the time IDC reckoned that Apple had a 12.3% market share.
IDC also reports that Samsung has fallen to fourth place in China for Q1, a big drop from its #1 position of a year ago.
Xiaomi has traditionally focused on the low-end of the Chinese smartphone market, however recently it has also been targeting the top end. Just last week the company launched its $480 Mi Note Pro. The new device features a 5.7 inch Quad HD LCD display, a Snapdragon 810 processor, 4GB of RAM, 64GB of internal storage, a 13MP camera, a 3090 mAh battery, and LTE category 9. The company has also been working to expand beyond China.

Over the past year, Xiaomi made the jump to its first markets outside China, and is now operating in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, and India. It entered the Indian market in July 2014, and it has managed to become an established player in that cutthroat market, having sold a million devices in the first six months.
Now the $46 billion company is looking towards another large, dynamic market: Brazil. Talking to the press in Taiwan, Hugo Barra (a native of Brazil) said Xiaomi will begin selling its affordable devices in Brazil within three months.
IDC also reports that Samsung has fallen to fourth place in China for Q1, a big drop from its #1 position of a year ago. However Samsung is still optimistic about its sales in China. “While there are signs that the explosive growth of smartphones in China will slow this year, the vast majority of China’s 885 million mobile users are using low-end and mid-range smartphones,” Samsung said in a statement. “This leaves plenty of room for upgrades to high-end phones as China’s market matures.”
China’s smartphone market is big, but it isn’t getting bigger
China’s such a big country that there’ll always be an insatiable demand for smartphones, right? Not according to research firm IDC, which believes that the nation’s phone market has contracted by four percent in the last year. The outfit’s merry band of spreadsheet-wranglers believes that the majority of Chinese people now own a mobile device, and as such, will only buy a phone when they want to upgrade.
The company has also drilled down into the winners and losers for the first quarter of the year, with no surprises as to who has come out on top. Apple is sitting comfortably on the number one spot, having shipped nearly 15 million devices in the first three months of the year. Sitting just behind it, however, are local brands Xiaomi and Huawei, which shipped 13.5 and 11.2 million phones in the same period. It’s a sadder tale for Samsung and Lenovo, both of which saw its shipments fall by a painful 53 and 22 percent, respectively.
[Image Credit: Getty]
Filed under: Cellphones, Apple, Samsung, Lenovo
Via: TechCrunch, WSJ
Source: IDC
This is probably Samsung’s Galaxy Tab S2
Several months ago rumors began to mention the next generation Galaxy Tab S products. In particular, the talk of the town was teaching us that Samsung would be utilizing a 4:3 aspect ratio, premium materials (a metal frame essentially) and the latest and greatest specs. As the weeks have passed, information has slowly leaked out, and now we find ourselves with what might be a first look at the finished product. Albeit it a press render.
This leaks comes to us via @onleaks, and as you can see, the tablet looks… A lot like the Galaxy Tab A series which has already been announced and released in several key markets around the world. Assuming this is the final product, it raises a somewhat odd question coming from Samsung: why does this premier premium product look like a baseline-budget one? Last year’s Galaxy Tab S series featured an exclusive design (reminiscent of the Galaxy S5) that looked night-and-day different from the Galaxy Tab 4, Galaxy Tab Pro, and Galaxy Note 10.1 2014/Pro 12.2 devices which came before it.
When last we heard, it is expected that in addition to a QHD SuperAMOLED screen, the Tab S2 series will come with an Exynos 5433 32-Bit CPU, but it may be replaced with the 7420 given the latter’s 64-bit processing — something that will come in handy with the Android 5.0.2 Lollipop build that they will be running on. Category 6 LTE will be supported on cellular models. The device will include 3GB of RAM and 32GB of on-board storage with microSD support up to 128GB. The 8-inch model will have a 3,580 mAh battery, the 9.7 inch, a 5,870 mAh unit. Both models will have an 8 megapixel rear camera and 2.1 front camera, according to the leaks.
Galaxy Tab S
.rvs_wrapper
width: 335px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
#page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
Assuming this leak is genuine, could Samsung be standardizing its tablet offerings? Might we be missing something (like the possibility of a glass back)? Moreover, what would this mean for Samsung products released later this year? Will they look similar to the S6?
Android Authority this week – May 10, 2015
Android fans, this week brought us the kind of news we all love and anticipate: the firsts sighting of a new Android version. Buried inside the Google I/O schedule is a clear reference to Android M, all but confirming that Google will at least preview Lollipop’s successor later this month. The week also brought us a juicy report on Huawei’s upcoming Nexus; the Galaxy S6 was again in the spotlight, for reasons good and bad; Google launched interesting new features for its apps and services; Oppo teased its latest flagship; Sony launched the selfie-centric Xperia C4; ZTE raised the ante with the luxurious Nubia Z9; and info about the OnePlus 2 leaked out.
Inside AA HQ
If you follow our YouTube channel, you probably spotted a video from a new contributor, Bailey Stein. Bailey is a student and lives in Michigan, and like the rest of our team, he is incredibly passionate about mobile technology. He will be contributing videos regularly and this BLU Selfie review is his first. Make him feel welcome!
SoundGuys.com has a new brand new design! We think it’s cleaner and nicer and it will make reading the excellent news and reviews by Kris Wouk’s and Adam Molina’s even nicer. Plus, there’s infinite scrolling and a couple of other goodies. Let us know what you think.
This week we reviewed the LG G4, and we were positively impressed. Josh gave the device an excellent 9 out 10 score, putting LG’s curved creation in very select company. The G4 is yet to go on sale, but you can win it already in our beloved weekly giveaway! Good luck!
Android Authority Podcast
The stuff you shouldn’t miss
- Gift guide: It’s not too late to buy Mom something nice. Here are some nice ideas
- Review: The LG G4 is here! How does it fare against the competition? Find out in our review
- Camera shootout: The results of our blind camera test are in: Galaxy S6 vs Honor P8 vs One M9
- Review: How about a new smartwatch to go with that LG G4? We review the LG Watch Urbane

Top news of the week
And here are the top news in the Android world this week:
Google updates
- Google is experimenting with Dart to create faster, smoother Android apps
- Google tests converting websites so they load 4x faster over slow connections
- Google’s latest acquisition will help make Calendar, Inbox and other apps ‘smarter’
- Google Plus introduces new Pinterest-like feature, Collections
- Google Hangouts Chrome app could be in line for a redesign
- Google adds food delivery option to search results

Galaxy S6 in the news
- Yes, a special Galaxy S6 Edge Iron Man edition is coming!
- Galaxy S6 features either ISOCELL or Sony image sensors, here’s the difference
- Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge reportedly getting camera improvements with Android 5.1.1
- Some Galaxy S6 owners are seeing a purple speck on photos taken with the front-facing camera
- Galaxy S6 getting performance improving update in Europe

Oppo R7 teasers

Android M: first sighting
Android M will supposedly be revealed at Google I/O 2015
Google to unveil Voice Actions at I/O: control any app with just your voice
The official Google I/O 2015 schedule is now available

Xperia C4 is here

Nubia Z9

Testing the waters for OnePlus 2

Huawei Nexus details
Sound off
We always want to hear your feedback. Whether it’s criticism or praise, feel free to tell us what you think about Android Authority’s content, design, and community. Comment here or get in touch with us on our social channels:
Happy Sunday!
Possible image of Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 leaks
Samsung has been working on some new tablets to be released in June to be the successors to the Galaxy Tab S devices. The new devices are expected to be named the Galaxy Tab S2 and will come in both 8-inch and 9.7-inch sizes with both WiFi-only and WiFi+cellular variants. A new leak from Twitter tipster @OnLeaks claims to reveal an image of the larger, 9.7-inch version of the Galaxy Tab S2.
One of the design cues that stands out in the image is the use of metal frame giving the tablet some flat, squared off edges. Samsung retains a physical home button, which some are wondering if a fingerprint sensor may be included it the button. The front of the device also appears to include a front-facing camera and an ambient light sensor.
Judging by the relative dimensions, it looks like Samsung may be going down the 4:3 display ratio path instead of 16:9. The new tablets are also expected to come equipped with at least Android 5.0 Lollipop out of the box.
source: @OnLeaks
Come comment on this article: Possible image of Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 leaks
Blind camera shootout – the votes are in…

A few days in Malta a couple of weeks ago for the IFA 2015 GPC presented the opportunity for an impromptu smartphone camera shootout between four heavyweights of the smartphone industry: the Huawei P8, the Honor 6 Plus, the Galaxy S6 Edge and the HTC One M9.
AA camera shootouts:
.rvs_wrapper
width: 335px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
#page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
Unlike past shootouts, we didn’t tell you which handset took each picture and instead, over the past week, thousands of you have cast your vote for which handset you think took the best picture. Now, the results are in but before we reveal the winner, let’s take a closer look at each of the scenes and I’ll let you know which handset I think took the best picture (in my unprofessional opinion).
Scene 1
#gallery-1
margin: auto;
#gallery-1 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-1 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-1 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
In the scene capturing the Bank of Valletta building in the capital of Malta, Phone C was most accurate in capturing the scene but Phone B was a little less oversaturated.
Winner: Phone C
Scene 2
#gallery-2
margin: auto;
#gallery-2 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-2 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-2 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Phone D captured the flag with most accuracy but Phone C compensated best for the varying colours of the building.
Winner: Draw (Phone C / Phone D)
Scene 3
#gallery-3
margin: auto;
#gallery-3 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-3 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-3 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
The winner here is actually Phone A as it captured enough detail in the sky and compensates for the white balance most accurately. Phone C was a close run second, Phone C did well to capture the building but failed to capture the sky and Phone D was somewhat accurate in portraying the building and sky.
Winner: Phone A
Scene 4
#gallery-4
margin: auto;
#gallery-4 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-4 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-4 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
It’s tough to pick a winner here as none of the images are completely accurate. Phone A doesn’t capture a lot of colours, Phone B has a weird hue, Phone C doesn’t compensate for the light in the scene and Phone D also fails to capture a lot of the colours. Having to pick a winner, I’d say that Phone C comes closest.
Winner: Phone C
Scene 5
#gallery-5
margin: auto;
#gallery-5 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-5 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-5 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
This scene was quite interesting as it was a gift to Queen Elizabeth and Phone B captured the colours most accurately. Phone A is a very close second while Phone D comes third and Phone C rounds off the list.
Winner: Phone B
Scene 6
#gallery-6
margin: auto;
#gallery-6 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-6 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-6 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
This was an interesting test of focusing on a large scene and the results are quite close between Phone B and Phone C. While Phone B is very good, Phone C depicts the sky and handles the changing scene the best and wins this round.
Winner: Phone C
Scene 7
#gallery-7
margin: auto;
#gallery-7 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-7 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-7 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
An interesting test as it was pointing each camera upwards and trying to focus on the chandelier in the iconic Manoel Theatre. Interestingly, Phone B wins this but Phone D is the best at capturing the individual parts of the chandelier and not being affected by the light rays from the chandelier.
Winner: Phone B
Scene 8
#gallery-8
margin: auto;
#gallery-8 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-8 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-8 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
This test actually showed how each phone handled a complex scene with subjects both near and far. Overall Phone B and Phone C are really close but Phone B wins it thanks to a little more detail in the sky.
Winner: Phone B
Scene 9
#gallery-9
margin: auto;
#gallery-9 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-9 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-9 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
A clear winner for me here is Phone B which captures detail in all parts of the image.
Winner: Phone B
Scene 10
#gallery-10
margin: auto;
#gallery-10 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-10 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-10 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Phone C has the least saturation and most life-like colours so it wins this scene. Phone A comes quite close, Phone B captures a lot of detail but oversaturates almost all parts of the image and Phone D comes a distant fourth.
Winner: Phone C
Scene 11
#gallery-11
margin: auto;
#gallery-11 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-11 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-11 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Phone A wins this scene for me as it appears to be the most life-like, while Phone B is slightly oversaturated and Phone C just appears to be a little dull.
Winner: Phone A
Scene 12
#gallery-12
margin: auto;
#gallery-12 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-12 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-12 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
This was an interesting test as there were rays of sunshine from the left and each device had to capture detail in both near and far. The winner for me is Phone B as it was the one which captured both parts of the scene but also depicted individual rays of sunshine.
Winner: Phone B
Scene 13
#gallery-13
margin: auto;
#gallery-13 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-13 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-13 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Nothing quite like an image that might gross you out. It’s difficult to pick a winner for this one as Phone C has the most detail but doesn’t fully compensate for the lack of light while Phone B picks up the light but loses a little detail in the cockroach leg. I’ll probably give this to Phone C with Phone B a very close second.
Winner: Phone C
Scene 14
#gallery-14
margin: auto;
#gallery-14 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-14 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-14 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
This is an interesting test and all four devices do well but the winner is Phone B as it keeps the colour of the building while also saturating the sky to make an overall nice image. Phone A and C come second as the former captures the building while the latter captures the scene well but is slightly oversaturated. Phone D is the most saturated for both the sky and the building.
Winner: Phone B
Scene 15
#gallery-15
margin: auto;
#gallery-15 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-15 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-15 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Another interesting test of the zoom capabilities of each handset and the winner is Phone C as it picks up the detail of the structure, the dome and the red IFA boxes attached to the dome. Phones B and D come a close second while Phone A finishes the collection.
Winner: Phone C
Scene 16
#gallery-16
margin: auto;
#gallery-16 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-16 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-16 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
The second last scene and the first test of the night capabilities. The test proved interesting but the winner is Phone C as it was the only one to capture detail in the brickwork without noise. Phone B comes a close second, Phone D is third and Phone A – which has a fair amount of noise and a lack of detail – comes in fourth.
Winner: Phone C
Scene 17
#gallery-17
margin: auto;
#gallery-17 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;
#gallery-17 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-17 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Now to the final scene and one of my favourite as the test is see whether each smartphone can capture the IFA 2015 sign – before it takes centre stage in a fireworks display – just in front of the red steps. It’s almost a dead heat between Phone A and Phone C but the former wins it because Phone C overcompensates the white balance and produces a lighter scene that’s doesn’t accurately capture the colour of the steps.
Winner: Phone A
The winner is…
So according to my results, the overall winner is Phone C, which is closely followed by Phone B. Phone A comes in third and Phone D brings up the rear. That’s my opinion but how did YOU vote?
Over the past week, over 3000 votes have been cast in the shootout and here’s how they stacked up at the time of writing:
So the Galaxy S6 Edge takes it from the Honor 6 Plus, which is closely followed by the Huawei P8 and rounding off the contest in last place is the HTC One M9. The Galaxy S6 Edge winning the contest is no surprise as the camera is very capable but the Honor 6 Plus in second deserves a special mention: at a price of £299 ($450), it’s almost half the price of the other contenders but beats them all to second place.
You might like…
.rvs_wrapper
width: 335px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
#page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
The Huawei P8 has a fabulous camera and it’s interesting that both of Huawei’s devices have registered almost the same number of votes. For many years, Huawei’s cameras have been progressively getting better and the latest modules are capable of producing fantastic photos that can rival most smartphones.
As for HTC – well it’s a tough one. I’ve been rather critical of the Taiwenese manufacturer but I do think that the new 20MP module in the HTC One M9 was always going to be challenge to optimise properly. Hopefully the woes of the M9 camera – many of which were pointed out in the comments on the original post – can be fixed with software updates but this remains to be seen.
Thanks for voting in the blind comparison and we’ve got another one planned for you! We’ve listened to some of the feedback and our next comparison – which will be up next week – will see the iPhone 6 Plus pitted against the LG G4 and the Galaxy S6 Edge with a DSLR as a control photo. As always, it promises to be epic so stay tuned!
Now check out the full reviews:
.rvs_wrapper
width: 335px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
#page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
Samsung’s round smartwatch to be debuted alongside Galaxy Note 5
<ins class="adsbygoogle"
style=”display:block”
data-ad-client=”ca-pub-8150504804865896″
data-ad-slot=”8461248232″
data-ad-format=”auto”>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();
After we found out that Samsung is enticing developers to adopt their SDK and develop apps for a round smartwatch, we started to wonder when Samsung’s round smartwatch would eventually be announced. If today’s latest rumour is anything to go by, this round smartwatch is going to be debuted alongside the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, expected to be announced at IFA 2015, because that’s when it’s announced every year. This makes a lot of sense given that a smartwatch has been announced there the last few years with a Note device, so this rumour is logical at the very least.
However, as with all rumours, this one should be taken with a grain of salt. The device is expected to be called the Samsung Gear A, though it’s possible the naming might change between now and when it’s released. Samsung has been remarkably quiet following the release of the Apple Watch, as no doubt they consider the Apple device to be their biggest competition in the wearable space. We just hope Samsung makes their devices a little more open this time so that Android users without Samsung devices can use them too.
What do you think about Samsung’s round smartwatch so far? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Source: SamMobile via Phone Arena
The post Samsung’s round smartwatch to be debuted alongside Galaxy Note 5 appeared first on AndroidSPIN.
Quick Look: Samsung Wireless Charging Pad with MicroUSB Charger
style=”display:block”
data-ad-client=”ca-pub-8150504804865896″
data-ad-slot=”8461248232″
data-ad-format=”auto”>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();
One feature that Samsung packed into the Samsung Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S6 Edge that they have never offered as a built-in function is wireless charging. It was easy enough to pick up one of their wireless charging cases, or one of a handful of others out there though. There were even a few go getters that created a wireless charging adapter that went behind the rear cover of the device. While some worked better than others, it wasn’t until the most recent flagship that Samsung made it a standard built-in ability. This function now lets users use a variety of Qi wireless charging pads, pucks, stands as anything that is Qi enabled will charge your device. here I will show you a quick look at the Samsung Wireless Charging pad.
In the box:
- Qi compatible wireless charging pad
- USB cable
- 2.0A wall block
- Quick start guide and warranty
The charging pad is a round puck style pad that is constructed of a hard plastic. Sitting in the middle is a raised rubber pad that helps the device stay in place. It is also useful for not scratching the rear gorilla Glass 4 too.
Around the outer edge is a clear plastic halo. There is a LED light that illuminates to show you the charging state. Blue means it is charging and green means your phone is charged.
I distinctively remember the first iteration of wireless chargers being horribly slow at charging a device. This was many years ago and the technology has come a long way. I ran the same battery charge tests that I do for other chargers and battery banks to see how it performed. To best test its charge rates I ran a 10 minute charge with all the usual connections still active. I did the same charge using the stock wall plug.
The stock charger that is included with the wireless charger along with all cellular connections, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi and location services connected offered up approximately 7% charge in 10 minutes. The device was naked without a case. Mind you, the charger that it comes with the unit does not enable fast charging.


Leaving the same connections on and placing the device on the Samsung wireless charger it pulled in approximately 5% battery charge in roughly 10 minutes. Again, the device was naked.
While it certainly will take your new flagship a little longer to reach full charge, having wireless charging certainly is a bit more convenient and should help keep extra strain off your USB port. Particularly at the office, in the living room, kitchen or wherever a quick set down is usual. However, there is a flaw in the whole process. Once your device hits 100% the charging pad shuts off and doesn’t resume. In a nutshell, you wouldn’t want to use this as an overnight bedside charging option as you will wake up to less than a full charge on your device. I can’t compare this to others out there as this is the only Qi charging pad I have ever used, but if there are other options that will keep it trickle charging overnight please leave a comment.
I gave it a charge test with the two cases I have sitting here, one being the Samsung Flip View cover and the other being the Rokform Crystal V3. I expected the Samsung case to have no issue as it is fairly thin, I was pleasantly surprised that the phone still charged with the thicker Rokform case on as well. The thicker Rokform case did charge much slower than the slimmer Samsung Flip View though. With the Rokform it slowed to 4 – 5 % per 10 minutes. Not a huge deal if you aren’t looking to grab large amounts of power in a short period of time.
The Samsung Wireless Charger is landing in stores all over the globe right now. Here in the US you can find them for $49.99. If you registered your device you should have received a 30% coupon in your email which knocks the price down to $35 + shipping unless you order something else to get your total over $50, then you get free shipping. Alternatively you can pick them up through Amazon for a little less.
http://ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&OneJS=1&Operation=GetAdHtml&MarketPlace=US&source=ac&ref=qf_sp_asin_til&ad_type=product_link&tracking_id=wwwandcom-20&marketplace=amazon®ion=US&placement=B00UCZGS6S&asins=B00UCZGS6S&linkId=WZGDTUABMWOXKIAQ&show_border=true&link_opens_in_new_window=truehttp://ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&OneJS=1&Operation=GetAdHtml&MarketPlace=US&source=ac&ref=qf_sp_asin_til&ad_type=product_link&tracking_id=wwwandcom-20&marketplace=amazon®ion=US&placement=B00UCZGS36&asins=B00UCZGS36&linkId=NQWJJ2XXOJZORGGI&show_border=true&link_opens_in_new_window=true
The post Quick Look: Samsung Wireless Charging Pad with MicroUSB Charger appeared first on AndroidSPIN.
Samsung Gear VR Innovator Edition for Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge now available for $200

If you’re an early adopter of the Galaxy S6 or S6 Edge and want to get your hands on Samsung’s next generation virtual reality headset, now’s your chance. The Gear VR Innovator Edition headset, built specifically for Samsung’s two newest flagships, can now be ordered online from either Best Buy or Samsung for $199.99. The headset will also be available in-store at select Best Buy stores beginning Friday, May 15th, if you’d rather purchase it that way.
Related Videos
.rvs_wrapper
width: 335px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
.rvs_wrapper
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
#page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
display: inline-block;
float: none;
vertical-align: top;
Samsung announced the updated version of the headset back at MWC 2015, bringing with it a few notable improvements over the Galaxy Note 4-specific model. The version built for the Galaxy S6 is 15% smaller overall, and is significantly lighter and more comfortable, as well. The touchpad on the side of the device has been recessed, making it easier to locate, and the back button is now more tactile than before.
We went hands-on with the headset at the big trade show, and we’d suggest checking out our first impressions video if you’re considering purchasing one. If you’re interested, follow the links below.


























































































