Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘Reviews’

9
Jun

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro review: checking the right boxes


The Bottom Line

PROS
  • Fantastic build quality
  • Thin and sleek design
  • Sharp and vibrant display
  • Snappy and responsive performance
  • Intuitive software
  • Quick charging
CONS
  • Poor low light camera performance
  • No expandable storage
  • Subpar battery life
  • Only available in China
8.7

The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro checks all the right boxes in key aspects, and proves to be a worthy competitor to the current crop of Android flagships out there, making it a shame that the device, at least for now, isn’t available outside of China.

(function($)
$(document).ready(function()
$(“#aa_bottom_line .aa_bl_pros_cons”).each(function()
var aa_bl_pc=$(this).find(“.aa_bl_pc”);
var aa_bl_pros=$(this).find(“.aa_bl_pros”).height();
var aa_bl_cons=$(this).find(“.aa_bl_cons”).height();
if(window.innerWidth > 480 && aa_bl_pros != aa_bl_cons)
if(aa_bl_pros > aa_bl_cons)
aa_bl_pc.height(aa_bl_pros);
else
aa_bl_pc.height(aa_bl_cons);

)
);
)(jQuery);

Editor's Choice Update 2015An ongoing trend that we’re seeing lately is manufacturers releasing better spec’d versions of their current flagship, usually taking the “Pro” or “Plus” moniker. Xiaomi is somehow different, as the up and coming Chinese company announced its Mi Note and Mi Note Pro at the same, although the Note Pro arrived to market a few months later.

With Xiaomi basically taking the Mi Note and putting it on steroids, does the Mi Note Pro bring enough to the table to compete with the current crop of Android flagships? We find out, in this in-depth review of the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro!

Design

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-6

The Mi Note Pro can be considered the bigger brother of its namesake, but that is true mostly in terms of the specifications, with things remaining largely identical when it comes to the physical appearance and build quality. The Mi Note Pro features the same metal and glass construction, with a 2.5D glass up front and its gentle curves along the edges, as well as the 3D glass on the back, that brings with it a more pronounced curve along the left and right sides. All of this is held together by a metal frame with chamfered edges. The most noticeable difference in terms of design has to do with the metal frame, which has been treated with a gold finish, compared to the silver finish of the Mi Note. The ring around the camera and the Mi logo are also coming with the matching gold color. The design isn’t overly flashy, and overall, the Mi Note Pro is a beautiful, elegant looking device, that also feels great in the hand.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-9

That said, like most phones with a glass panel on the back, the device does tend to feel slippery, and is very prone to smudges. The chamfered edges along the metal frame do help with grip though. One handed usability is also surprisingly good, despite what the display size of 5.7-inches might suggest. Of course, there’s no denying that this is a large smartphone by any standard, and some hand gymnastics will be required to reach every corner of the display, but the thin bezels along the sides of the display and the thin profile of the device allow for a better handling experience than you may think.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-10

Taking a look around the device, the power button and volume rocker are located on the right side within easy reach. The buttons are also made of metal, and are easy to press with a good tactile feedback, adding to the high-end nature of the device. The headphone jack is up top, the microUSB port and single speaker unit is placed at the bottom, and the SIM card slot is found on the left side. Up front are the capacitive keys below the display, with a multi-colored LED notification light next to the front-facing camera, earpiece, and other typical sensors, at the top.

Display

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-3

As mentioned, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro comes with a 5.7-inch display, which is a good size for media-consumption and playing games. The resolution has been bumped to Quad HD as well, with a pixel density of 515 ppi, making for a screen that is extremely sharp. The display also offers rich and vibrant colors, high contrast, and some very deep blacks beyond what you’d generally expect from an IPS LCD display, along with really good viewing angles. While the default, out of the box settings are already good, Xiaomi has included some color calibration settings to tweak the display more to your liking, but in all likelihood, you won’t find the need to make many changes.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-25

There is a reading mode available that helps reduce the strain on your eyes if you are planning to look at the screen for long periods of time. The screen also does a great job at reducing glare, making the display very easy to see in broad daylight. This can be attributed to what Xiaomi calls a “Sunlight Display,” which actually makes adjustments at the hardware level to each individual pixel, for better real time contrast and outdoor visibility, as opposed to the otherwise standard practice of just ramping up the brightness of the display.

Performance and hardware

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-13

Under the hood, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is packing the Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 processor, clocked at 2 GHz, and backed by the Adreno 430 GPU and 4 GB of RAM. The Snapdragon 810 has received a bit of flak since its launch when it comes to overheating, but regardless, is still one of the most powerful chipsets currently available. The Mi Note Pro is also one of a handful of devices to boast 4 GB of RAM, which is of the LPDDR4 variety, said to be almost twice as fast and more power efficient when compared to the older DDR3.

#gallery-1
margin: auto;

#gallery-1 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-1 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-1 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

High-end flagships are getting so fast nowadays that it is really hard to notice much of a difference from one to another in terms of performance,  and the Mi Note Pro can also more than hold its own against the best of the competition. In day to day usage, the device was extremely fluid and responsive, despite this particular review unit still running software in its beta iteration. Everything from navigating around the various elements of the UI, opening, closing, and switching between applications, and playing games is a pleasant experience. Of course, multi-tasking is an absolute breeze as well, as you would expect with the 4 GB DDR4 RAM that the device is packing.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-20

It has to be mentioned though that when playing games, or while watching a lot of videos, the Mi Note Pro did start to get a little warm, and you can definitely feel the heat dissipating through the metal frame. It doesn’t get to the point where the device becomes uncomfortable to hold or downright unusable, and is not necessarily a huge concern, but rather something to be aware of.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-5

The Mi Note Pro comes with 64 GB of on-board storage, which is the only configuration available, and should be more than enough for most users. That said, expandable storage via microSD card is not an option, if you were hoping for it to be available. The device also comes with a standard suite of connectivity options, including 4G LTE support, but is unfortunately not compatible with the LTE networks in the US. While internet access was restricted to HSPA+ on the T-Mobile network, that still proved to be fast enough.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-12

Speaker quality from the bottom mounted speaker is also quite good, as it gets plenty loud for a single driver without sounding distorted. As with any other bottom firing speaker though, it can be very easy to muffle when holding the device in landscape orientation, and the sideways firing audio does create a lopsided listening experience.

#gallery-2
margin: auto;

#gallery-2 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 33%;

#gallery-2 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-2 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Another aspect that stays identical between this device and the Mi Note is the capacity of the battery, with both devices coming with 3,000 mAh units. The bump in screen resolution from 1080p to Quad HD, as well as the general bump in specifications, without an increase in the battery capacity to compensate means that the battery life of the Mi Note Pro leaves a lot to be desired. A full day of use is possible with light to moderate use, which includes staying away from activities like gaming or watching a lot of videos, but for the most part, you may find yourself reaching for the charger around halfway through your day. On the bright side, the Mi Note Pro does comes with Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0 support, which promises a charge up to 70% in just an hour.

Camera

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-14

The Mi Note Pro also comes with the same 13 MP rear camera with OIS as the standard Mi Note, and Xiaomi is quite proud of the fact they were able to keep the camera unit flush with the body, despite the phone being just 7 mm thick.

The camera application is quite simplistic, with a simple swipe down or to the left revealing a slew of filters that you can play around with. A swipe in the opposite direction is where you’ll find the list of standard shooting modes, that include a manual mode and panorama, along with a few others like Beautify and Refocus, that lets you refocus your shot after the fact. You can tap on the viewfinder to change the point of focus, just like with any other smartphone, but being able to adjust the exposure at the same time through the on-screen exposure dial is definitely one of the most intuitive aspects of Xiaomi’s camera UI. The camera software also allows you to make adjustments to the exposure settings, contrast, saturation, and sharpness, for more granular control over the image quality.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-2

Speaking of image quality, it’s just as good as it was on the Mi Note, which isn’t really surprising, given that it is the same sensor and camera software. The shutter speed is nice and quick, allowing you to easily take a shot, and the images in general are vibrant, rich in color, with a good amount of contrast and dynamic range in both indoor and outdoor situations. The camera is also capable of taking some rather impressive macro shots, with a very clear subject of focus in the foreground, and a nice and clean bokeh effect in the background. Auto HDR is also available on this camera to help take out the guess work on when to use HDR, and the HDR processing itself does a great job of bringing out some extra details in the shadows, while adding a nice boost in saturation, without appearing unnatural.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-22

Where this camera struggles the most is in low light and night time photography. The increase in digital noise is to be expected, but there’s just a lot of noise reduction going on in the post processing, that results in softer details, and highlights that tend to get blown out. The camera also tends to hunt for focus more often than I’d like, and many of the images will have some noticeable artifacting. Overall though, this is really not a bad camera to have in your pocket. 4K video recording is also possible with the Mi Note Pro, and the OIS does the great job of keeping the footage stable when you’re walking or moving around. The continuous autofocus is very quick when moving between close and far away subjects, and manual control over focusing is also available by just tapping on the viewfinder.

With the front camera Xiaomi chose to not go with a higher megapixel count, and instead took HTC’s approach by going with a lower resolution 4 megapixel sensor with a larger pixel size of 2 microns. This allows for more light to enter the camera and better quality images, so if selfies are your thing, than the front camera is not going to disappoint.

Software

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-26

On the software front, the Mi Note Pro runs the MIUI OS based on Android 5.0 Lollipop, but you’ll be hard pressed to find any material design elements in this user interface. The UI is actually quite similar to what you’d see from most Chinese OEMs, with colorful square icons, and the noticeable lack of an app drawer, which can take some getting used to and leaves users dependent on folders to stay organized.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro-24

There is actually not much in the way of pre-installed bloatware though, and while MIUI is a distinct departure from Google’s vision of Android, it does add more to the experience than it takes away. It will understandably be a very different experience for first time users, but Xiaomi’s take on Android isn’t overbearing in any way. More than that, the UI brings with it a handful of useful features, such as HiFi audio, that allows for better quality audio when listening via headphones, and a one-handed mode that lets you shrink the screen from anywhere between 3.5-inches to 4.5-inches, just by swiping outwards on the home button in either direction.

#gallery-3
margin: auto;

#gallery-3 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 50%;

#gallery-3 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-3 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

MIUI also offers one of the most robust theme engines available on any Android skin. There are hundreds of different themes to choose from, so you’re bound to find at least a few that suit your tastes. These themes alter pretty much every part of the OS, from the System UI, lockscreen, icons, wallpapers, and even the default applications like the Dialer and the messaging app.

Specifications

Display 5.7-inch IPS LCD
Quad HD, 515 ppi
Processor 2 GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 810
Adreno 430 GPU
RAM 4 GB DDR4
Storage 64 GB
not expandable
Camera 13 MP rear camera with OIS and dual LED flash
4 MP front-facing camera
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, WiFi Direct, hotspot
Bluetooth 4.1, GPS + GLONASS
microUSB 2.0
Networks 3G / 4G LTE (only in select markets)
Software Android 5.0 Lollipop
Battery 3,000 mAh
Dimensions 155.1 x 77.6 x 7 mm
161 grams

Gallery

Pricing and final thoughts

Editor's Choice Update 2015The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is currently available in China for the equivalent of around $480, but that is the only market the device has launched in so far, and you will likely end up paying a hefty premium to import the device. It will also be wise to first check for LTE compatibility with your home networks, if you do decide to pick it up. Until the Mi Note Pro is officially available in other markets, opting for the other flagship devices may be the more viable option.

So there you have it for this in-depth look at the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro! Xiaomi claims that the Mi Note Pro is the best smartphone in the world, and while that statement is certainly subjective, the device does manage to impress in key aspects, with regards to build quality, performance, the camera, software, and the overall user experience. The Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is definitely a worthy competitor to the current crop of Android flagships, and it is actually quite a shame that, at least for now, more people won’t be able to get their hands on it.

8
Jun

Runtastic’s new Leg Workout Trainer app review


Like many people, I don’t really consider myself in “shape”. I don’t have the 6 pack abs, bouncing pectorals, or buns of steel. I do however; have a need to improve my health. So when the opportunity came up to review Runtastic’s new Leg Workout Trainer app, I jumped at the opportunity.

The app’s user interface follows the Android design language. I found that the app was very intuitive and easy to use.

There are 3 ways to use the app.

The first is a dedicated training plan. The plan spans approximately 3 months and has 15 pre-planned training sessions that start off pretty easy, but increase in difficulty over time.Even though I said they start of easy, to someone who is out of shape like myself, they will still prove challenging.3D avatar “Angie” demonstrates the workout, while a male voice guides you through it.If you download Runtastic’s Music app, you can create playlists to play in the background as you workout. This adds a nice element of customization.This is the ideal mode for beginners. Screenshot_2015-05-08-14-16-14
The second way to use the apps is though the my workouts section. This section allows you to select from either the 5 pre-programmed workouts, or you can create your own.When you create your own workout, you must select from the exercise videos in the library, how many sets, repetitions, and how long of a rest before the next video.Like the training plan, you can listen to music through Runtastic’s music app, but it must be changed through the training plans interface.People that work out on a more regular basis will appreciate this mode. Screenshot_2015-05-08-14-25-32
The third way to use the app is by watching the individual workouts. The videos seamlessly loop non-stop.They can be filtered by the muscle groups that will be worked out or your favorited videos. Screenshot_2015-05-08-14-19-56

What they got right:
In a word, simplicity. This app is dead simple to use. If your familiar with Android’s UI, then you won’t have any problems navigating the application.

What could be improved:
I find myself having to stretch to find improvements for this app. If there was anything that could be improved, it would be customization within the app. I’m not referring to the workouts. As you read earlier, there is a high degree of  workout customization available within the app. I’m referring to being able to change the avatar or the voice that guides you though the workout. I would also love to see this app on Amazon’s Fire TV.

Overall this app has a broad appeal. Whether your a beginner or en experienced athlete, this app has something for you.

The post Runtastic’s new Leg Workout Trainer app review appeared first on AndroidGuys.

8
Jun

iClever 6-port Travel Wall Charger review


With all the advances that we as human beings have seen in regards to technology over the years, one thing has disbelievingly not seen much change. The act of still having to charge our devices. Wouldn’t it be nice if we could buy a product, say a tablet, and it would have a battery life expiration date of, lets say three years, before we either had to get a new device or switch out the old battery. Now, I know, I speak words of a madman, but who knows, maybe in a decade or two we may reach that point. In the meantime though, we still need to keep our devices charged and iClever has a great 6-port travel wall charger that aims to assist. Does it succeed, let’s find out (Insert ominous music)

Design

The iClever 6-port travel wall charger comes in a rectangular shape with the exception of the rounded top. It is coated in black, matte finish that will keep pesky fingerprints at bay and making holding the device a pleasure. There is very little print on the iClever 6-port travel wall charger as the only words you will find on it are the iClever logo, voltage information on the left side, and technical specifications on the bottom.

51OBBu6DSCL._SL1100_

There are six USB ports that make up most of the input slots of the iClever 6-port travel wall charger on the left side, all with their specific voltage output written on the bottom in white. As a matter of fact, all the printed words and small design aesthetics of the iClever 6-port travel wall charger are in white, which go great with the black finish of the charger. Moving on to the other side of the iClever 6-port travel wall charger, you get only one port, where the cord that connects the device to the power outlet will go. Overall, the iClever 6-port travel wall charger is a very slim device with a great modern look that does not detract from its purpose, to charge your devices.

Performance

So how well does the iClever 6-port travel wall charger work? Quite well, if I do say so myself. The iClever 6-port travel wall charger comes with SmartID which iClever states will automatically determine the appropriate amp speed of your device and charge it at maximum speed. While we can’t determine if that is the case or not, we can say for certain that the iClever 6-port travel wall charger charged the devices that were hooked up to it quite quickly. I plugged the charger to the outlet next to my desk and hooked up my Droid Turbo, Acer Tablet, Pebble Steel and my Moto 360 to it and they all charged normally. I can’t really say they charged any faster than if I had used a different charger, but they definitely did not charge any slower.

61C+99JQEML._SL1200_

Final Thoughts

The iClever 6-port travel wall charger is a great little charger that can make a great gift to the tech aficionado or anyone else that regularly travels and needs to charge multiple devices. Heck, even if they don’t travel, with the slim profile and sleek appearance, you can just as easily place it on a desk and it would fit right in.

The post iClever 6-port Travel Wall Charger review appeared first on AndroidGuys.

8
Jun

LG G4 vs Samsung Galaxy S6 / S6 Edge


setTimeout(function()
brightcove.createExperiences();
,
3000);

The first half of the 2015 flagship season brought high-end releases from all the major players in the Android world, and, while many of the upgrades were iterative, these latest offerings are all compelling in their own way. LG and Samsung had very different approaches this time around — the former maintained their winning formula, while the latter attempted to rethink the game altogether.

How do the current flagships from the two Korean giants fare against each other? We find out, as we take a closer look at the LG G4 vs Samsung Galaxy S6/Edge!

Design

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (8 of 28)

Looking at the two phones, it’s obvious that while LG stuck to their guns, only adding new tricks to their existing formula, Samsung took things in a pretty different direction from before.

The Samsung flagships are no longer made of plastic, a much-needed change for a lot of users who weren’t happy with the existing standard, but the move was unfortunately not without sacrifices. Previously staple features like the replaceable battery and microSD card expansion were omitted in favor of the metal and glass unibody design, and that’s still a point of contention among Samsung fans. While the regular Galaxy S6 retains the flat design of its predecessors, in the case of its Edge counterpart, Samsung went all in with the curved display, putting edges on both sides of the display. This turns out to be a great choice in terms of handling, as the screen coming down to meet the palm makes for an accessible device. A prominent metal lip plays a role here of course, so that the screen isn’t all you are touching on the sides.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (9 of 28)

Despite the significant departure from the norm, there’s no mistaking either the Galaxy S6 or the S6 Edge as anything other than a Samsung device, with both devices retaining key signature elements, with classic layout of a physical home button flanked by Back and Recent Apps keys still found up front, along with the power button and volume rocker found on their usual sides, to the right and left respectively. Finally, colors are translucent behind the glass, giving every version of the device a very glossy look. It’s definitely a new direction for the Samsung Galaxy S line, and one that we’re actually quite pleased about, with the device now offering the premium look and feel expected from a high-end flagship, even if that means giving up some features.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (3 of 28)

On the other hand is the LG G4, with a design language that is very similar to LG releases of the past year. Despite being the larger of the two flagships, a few key aspects do help with the overall handling experience. The button layout on the back falls squarely where index finger would rest, a signature LG element that remains a unique and functional take on the typical button placement. Curves are also a part of the LG G4, but to a lesser extent when compared to the LG G Flex 2. The curve on the front is subtle, but is far more pronounced on the back, which gives a comfortable feeling in the hand, and makes the device more durable compared to normal smartphones.

lg g4 color comparison aa (1 of 11)

Of course, the main addition when it comes to the LG G4 is the new leather back covers, with numerous options available in a variety of colors and a few textures. If you have a problem with the source of the material though, plastic options are also available. What is more important, however, is that the back cover is removable, something that is rarely seen in high-end devices nowadays,which enables the inclusion of a removable battery and a microSD card slot.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (10 of 28)

Both devices leverage the curved display to a certain extent, with the Galaxy S6 Edge focusing on features, compared to the G4, that prioritizes durability. The Samsung flagships understandably offer more when it comes to the handling experience, mostly due their comparatively smaller sizes, and the drastic departure from the norm in terms of build quality and design are a welcome change. On the other hand, while the LG G4 does get style points for the leather backings, the device can otherwise be best described as a worthwhile update to previous editions of LG’s high-end models. If you’re looking for phones that have moved forward from past design iterations, these two have definitely made the right steps forward.

Display

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (15 of 28)

Both Samsung and LG are well-known for their display prowess, and each company brings their pedigrees to these phones, with very specific, but different, focuses.

Starting with the S6, the Super AMOLED panel builds on Samsung’s years of improvements, boasting a Quad HD resolution despite being just 5.1-inch in size and that high saturation Samsung has been know for a long time. Very high pixel densities are found here, so all the elements on this screen are really sharp. What sets the Edge variant apart is the ability to use the two curves on the sides of the display for a handful of interesting features: the sides can show a ticker-like information stream, they can glow a certain color when your favorite contacts are calling, or they can stay on to function as a night clock. It’s still up for discussion how useful these features are, but that doesn’t take away from the fact that both the Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge are some of the finest smartphone displays around.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (4 of 28)

The LG G4 brings an update to one of the first Quad HD displays on the market, found on last year’s LG G3, and goes in a very different direction compared to Samsung’s screens. To ensure color accuracy, LG adhered to the DCI color standard, which  is commonly used in the TV industry; the G4 supposedly hits 98% of that standard, rather than going way over it, as Samsung routinely does. This is achieved by enhancing the IPS panel into what is called a Quantum Display, giving LG’s typical panel a boost in color gamut and saturation. The G4’s 5.5-inch size is great for media consumption, and with the very high pixel density, text and other elements are very sharp as well.

The claims about color saturation might be a bit too specific for common users, but it’s not difficult to see that the Quantum Display definitely is significantly less saturated compared to the Super AMOLED screens on the S6 and S6 Edge. It comes down to whether sensory overload, for lack of a better term, is important to you or not, as we’ve found the Super AMOLED display to be just that little bit more pleasing than other displays. The LG G4 does bring more real estate with it though, which is great for media consumption and gaming, and it certainly manages to make up for the ground lost in the color department.

Performance

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (20 of 28)

Again, the G4 and S6/Edge go in different directions when it comes to performance.

Samsung decided to move away from the Snapdragons of the world, instead using the Galaxy S6 as the global coming-out party for the Exynos 7420 processor, aided by 3 GB of RAM. What is most important here is how Samsung optimized the latest iteration of TouchWiz UI with their in-house processing package, making for a device that flies through the various elements of the user interface. You can see this in action when double pressing the home button to launch  the camera incredibly fast. Gaming is an absolute breeze as well, as everything from 2D games to more processor-intensive ones like Dragon Quest VIII running smoothly and easily. Multi-tasking is smooth even when using features like Multi-Window or S Window, and the Recent Apps screen is just as fast as you’d expect from a current generation flagship.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (16 of 28)

LG, on the other hand, strengthened their relationship with Qualcomm, and adopted the Snapdragon 808 processor. Like Samsung, LG focused on optimization this time around, resulting in a fast version of the LG UI. Backed by the Adreno 418 GPU and 3 GB of RAM, the 808 may not sound like the best processor available, but it certainly feels like one. The LG UI continues to be quite saturated with features, but the optimization seems to have worked well to make this a very reliable and snappy daily driver. Multi-tasking is quite smooth, and LG’s own shortcut for launching the camera is fast as well, even if it doesn’t always work as expected. There were a few instances of stutter when playing games like Dragon Quest VIII, but it’s not clear if this is due to the processor or some other issue.

Performance issues are, for the most part, a non-issue with either of these devices, and you’d be hard pressed to call one that much faster than the other. Disparities that occur in situations like gaming are still minor, and they can probably be attributed to software, as the LG UX is certainly more bloated when compared to the more spartan iteration of TouchWiz. As daily drivers, you’re still getting the best that either of these companies can offer this year, and 2015 certainly feels like a bit of a renaissance in Android performance.

Hardware

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (17 of 28)

Like with displays and design, there are significant differences in terms of the hardware features of the LG G4 and Samsung Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge, which hasn’t always been the case with previous generations.

LG decided to retain two key features that many people were disappointed to see removed from Samsung’s flagship phones. Out of these two features, expandable storage is probably the main point of contention, though the 32 GB base option that the Galaxy S6 comes with should be more than enough. (Of course, there are higher storage capacity options available as well, for those that are willing to shell out more.)

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (19 of 28)

The battery is no longer removable on the Galaxy S6, so those who appreciated the convenience of swapping batteries on the go should look elsewhere. That said, the battery can offer a full day of use with moderate usage, but power users may need to keep additional charging options on hand. Wireless charging is built into the Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge, and the devices are compatible with the two major wireless charging standards, something you don’t see on other devices. There’s also support for fast charging, which should make it easier to cope with the average battery life of the S6.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (14 of 28)

Samsung does manage to pack something extra into their devices every time though, and on the S6 it’s a heart rate monitor and a fingerprint scanner. The heart rate sensor, found on the back next to the camera unit, work better this time around because of the change to a vertical orientation. The fingerprint scanner, embedded into the physical home button up front, allows for some convenient security, as you just have to press the button and hold it to unlock the device. That’s a far better implementation compared to what was on the S5.

There’s no fingerprint scanner or hear rate monitor on the LG G4, but you do get a removable battery and expandable storage. Knock Code returns to help with the security side of things, but it simply isn’t as easy as Samsung’s fingerprint reader. 32 GB of on-board storage is also standard, but the ability to use microSD cards is a big bonus, especially for those looking to take advantage of the RAW photo capture capabilities of the G4 camera. Finally, the LG G4 packs a 3,000 mAh unit that offers long battery life even for heavy users, but it’s still hard to get a second day of usage. While the option to carry around a spare battery is always available, there’s no fast charging and getting wireless charging requires buying a special cover fitted with the necessary coil.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (12 of 28)

Despite the lack of two hardware features plenty of users have taken for granted, the Galaxy S6 still brings something different to the table, with a couple of unique features. The LG G4, on the other hand, doesn’t stray from the standard, but it makes it up by including features that most other manufacturers are phasing out.

Camera

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (18 of 28)

When it comes to the camera, LG is trying to one-up the f/1.9 aperture of the Samsung cameras by offering a f/1.8 aperture and a large sensor, which means more light can be captured from a scene, resulting in more accurate rendition. The fast laser-guided autofocus also returns, this time backed up by a color spectrum sensor, which analyzes the scene for proper white balance interpretation.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (27 of 28)

The one-upmanship continues with the manual mode: the G4 camera app provides everything from a histogram, to a full Kelvin white balance gamut, along with plenty of ISO stops and shutter speeds. The camera interface is pretty intuitive, and any seasoned photographer will feel at home in. That said, pretty much anyone can get some great photos with the fast and responsive simple mode, where you can snap a picture just by tapping on the subject.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (26 of 28)

The front-facing camera is another case of LG trying to get the edge, with its gesture-based shots bolstered by an 8 MP sensor, compared to the 5 MP sensor found on the front of the Samsung flagships. The picture quality is quite good with either though, and the wide-selfie feature of the Galaxy S6 is a little more useful than the gesture shot of the G4. It’s nice to be able to easily check the selfie you just took by simply bringing the phone down to a normal viewing angle though.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (28 of 28)

Coming to the Samsung camera, the f/1.9 aperture is still good for some nice depth-of-field shots, and doesn’t lose its footing to the G4 in that regard. The manual mode in the Samsung camera app isn’t nearly as robust though, and while some manual controls are available, they are certainly not in terms of minute adjustments. HDR can be kept on auto at all times, like in the G4, but this is also true for the front facing camera, which also comes with an  f/1.9 aperture.

Samsung Galaxy S6 camera samples

A more in-depth camera shootout is coming, but we can say that these two cameras are high up on the list of best Android shooters. It looks like Samsung finally understood that post-processing can make or break an image, and in looking closer at the Galaxy S6 photos, the grain is largely left alone. These photos also get a bump up in saturation, making for some really vivid photos in almost any situation.

LG G4 camera samples

While the saturation isn’t quite as high for the LG G4, the device does a good job of interpreting proper white balance levels, resulting in pretty accurate photos most of the time. The f/1.8 aperture doesn’t make it that much better in low light situations, but we prefer it over Samsung in these cases. The LG G4 has a bit more post processing and noise reduction going on though, and that can result in smudgier images. That said, this can be countered by shooting in RAW format, allowing for post production work using programs like Lightroom, which is a great feature for the budding shutter bug.

As already mentioned, these are two of the best Android cameras we’ve used and either of these phones will be great companions to have in the pocket. The G4 might be a bit faster in its auto mode, but the Samsung pictures are just that bit more pleasing to the eyes with their punchy colors.

Software

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (13 of 28)

When it comes to the software side of things, once heavily bloated operating systems finally get the optimizations needed to create speedy and reliable daily drivers.

In the case of the LG G4, some of the features that felt overwhelming on previous generations can still be found, but they are hidden in this iteration of the UX, based on Android 5.0 Lollipop. Certain features like Smart Bulletin still need to be turned off from the get go, and Smart Notice, despite its rather simple look, doesn’t prove particularly useful. The QSlide apps are tucked away from the Quick Settings menu, unless you really need them. Even the enhanced calendar application and the categorized gallery don’t really add up to big additions.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (24 of 28)

Certain elements that have been retained, such as Knock Code and the ability to customize the softkey layout, do add to the overall experience though, with features like Dual Window helping with multi-tasking. Ultimately, this is a typical LG take on Android, that manages to not be very harsh on the eyes. What is most important, though, is that even when jumping among recent apps, sliding menus to and fro, and scrolling between the various elements, the experience remains smooth and snappy, which is great, and a testament to LG’s optimization work with Qualcomm. The relationship with Google also shines through — Google Chrome is the default browser, and users get 100 GB of free Google Drive storage for two years.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (6 of 28)

On the other hand, Samsung not only optimized their OS for the Exynos processor, but also slimmed it down. Most tutorial screens that used to be particularly annoying are not to be found anymore, and certain software features can easily be hidden if you don’t need them. Multi-Window continues to be as useful as ever, but that cannot be said for the S Finder and S Window capabilities, so it’s great that the latter can be turned off. Samsung’s own applications have been updated as well, including S Health, which looks better and takes advantage of the heart rate monitor. The curved sides of the Galaxy S6 Edge house a few features as well, like a quick notification view, and information tickers for things like Twitter and news feeds. Their best usage though is still as a night clock, which displays a faint clock during user-defined hours.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (25 of 28)

At the end of the day, the main story here is that, while both the G4 and the S6 offer a lot of features, they are as quick and smooth as they need to be. Both companies have received a lot of flak for stutter and lag on previous iterations of TouchWiz and LG UX, but complaints are few and far between this time around, and that is a wonderful development.

Specs Comparison

  Samsung Galaxy S6 / S6 Edge LG G4
Display 5.1-inch Quad HD Super AMOLED display
577 ppi
5.5-inch Quad HD Curved Quantum display
534 ppi
Processor 2.1 GHz octa-core Exynos 7420 processor
Mali-T760
1.8 GHz 64-bit hexa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 processor
Adreno 418 GPU
RAM 3 GB 3 GB
Storage 32/64/128 GB
not expandable
32 GB, expandable up to 128 GB
Network 4G / LTE / HSPA+ 21/42 Mbps 4G / LTE / HSPA+ 21/42 Mbps
Connectivity Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth 4.1, NFC, A-GPS / Glonass, USB 2.0 Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth Smart Ready (Apt-X) 4.1, NFC
SlimPort, A-GPS / Glonass, USB 2.0
Camera Rear 16 MP with OIS.
Front 5 MP wide angle lens
Rear 16 MP with OIS+
Front 8 MP
Software Android 5.0.2 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop
Battery 2,600 mAh – S6 Edge
2,550 mAh – S6
3,000 mAh
Dimensions 142.1 x 70.1 x 7 mm
132 grams – S6 Edge
143.4 x 70.5 x 6.8 mm
138 grams – S6
148.9 x 76.1 x 9.8 mm
155 grams

Gallery

Pricing and final thoughts

The LG G4 and Samsung Galaxy S6/Edge will both come in at a premium price on-contract or unlocked, and will be available from all the network carriers in the US.

samsung galaxy s6 edge vs lg g4 aa (2 of 28)

So there you have it, for this in-depth look at the LG G4 vs Samsung Galaxy S6/S6 Edge! If you want the best Android flagships available right now, both of these phones tick a lot of the right boxes.

Those who want a larger device will go for the LG G4 with its 5.5-inch screen, that provides the real estate needed for work and play. The Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge are still fun in their smaller size, but it is at the expense of expandable storage. For a unique looking device, the S6 Edge is clearly a head-turning device, but the leather back of the LG G4 gives it a real measure of style. Either camera will bring the kind of quality users will want for capturing the moment. As daily drivers, these are speedy Android phones that are less bogged down by gimmicks compared to previous generations.

Ultimately, your needs will dictate which one is better for you, but what’s great about these Korean powerhouses is that, where one doesn’t succeed, the other likely does.

5
Jun

Lara Croft: Relic Run – an intense runner game review


lcrr logoLara Croft, this very name will remind anybody of Angelina Jolie as the adventurous treasure hunter. And that’s what this game is about. If you like to spend hours on endless running games and still come back for more then Lara Croft: Relic Run is the game to have on your device.

Since the introduction of Temple Runcountless running games have been released. Each offering something different, but all the more a same running style sequence where you collects coins and duck or jump to keep running. Also, the usual power ups. It gets boring after a while and we stop playing them. Lara Croft: Relic Run is all that and much more. It will keep you coming back for more. It’s got weapons, ATV’s and motorcycles and of course our dear Lara.

2015_06_03_20.57.42It’s a whole new twist to behind-the-back running games. Every time, I played the game it showed me something new. The variety of obstacles is absolutely crazy! This game is incredibly well made and you’ll find yourself parkouring over obstacles , wall-running over pits, and riding a motorcycle or even an ATV! You may even ride a T-Rex at some point in the game (No, I’m not kidding). There are also some boss fights and light combat. The game has you find and collect relics. Each relic requires some components to complete, all of which have to be found in one single run. If Lara dies, you have to start over again.

2015_06_03_21.04.30Lara Croft: Relic Run totally beats the crap out of some popular runner games like Spider-Man Unlimited and Despicable Me: Minion RushThose games are great, agreed. But none of them have the character firing weapons at prehistoric lizard people or even battling a damn T-Rex! I have got to give credit to SQUARE ENIX Ltd for developing such an awesome game.

With all that being said, the game currently has two maps, with more to come soon. Its also got a wide range of items in the store such as diamonds, weapons, armour and health packs. Almost everything can be purchased with coins and upgrades are fairly easy to get. There is also something called ‘Resurrection Ankh’ which keeps Lara from dying and can be purchased with diamonds. Also, there are no other characters, but different outfits can be bought from the store so you can customize Lara.

Onto the issues, the game is a tad hard to play. Twisty paths, with the game constantly shoving new obstacles in your face will make you lose concentration and die very quickly. It requires instant reflexes. Also, I experienced a slight lag sometimes with the game not registering my swipes when I did them quickly.

Lara Croft: Relic Run has surely given new meaning to its genre of games. A challenging runner game which shows a lot of promise. Enhancing the gameplay and variety to another level, giving new legs to the endless running spectacle.

What we like:

  • Nice graphics
  • Immersive gameplay
  • Variety in playability

What needs improvement:

  • Game optimization
  • Difficulty level

Did you check out Lara Croft: Relic Run? Tell us what you thought in the comments!

Screenshots

2015_06_03_21.19.01
2015_06_03_21.05.33
2015_06_03_21.04.30
2015_06_03_20.57.42
2015_06_03_21.42.20
2015_06_03_21.41.53
2015_06_03_21.41.30
2015_06_03_21.19.49

The post Lara Croft: Relic Run – an intense runner game review appeared first on AndroidGuys.

5
Jun

Organize your life with Centrallo, a fresh look


Just about eight and a half months after my original Centrallo review, Centrallo has released a material design update. I am going to take a fresh look at the app with its updated design!

Centrallo is an organizational app that aims to add order to your life.

It is actually an ingeniously simple concept. You can add lists and notes. Each list can contain more lists and notes.

Usage

The Good

The simplicity of the app is the real attraction here. Centrallo has the easiest to use interface. Everything is intuitive to use, but some of the glyphs for images are a bit tough to decipher. After playing around, it is very easy to use.

Centrallo is perfect for organizing projects or thoughts.

As stated in the previous review, the cross platform usability is also a nice plus. It works on desktop, iOS and Android devices. Another thing being done right is each app has been specifically designed for the particular platform.

The Android app isn’t an iOS port, it is a full fledged app with material design and all things that Android users love.

The Middle Ground

Sharing capabilities could be better still. While people can now view lists or notes without a Centrallo account, the in-app sharing is a bit buggy. This will most likely be fixed in future builds.

Actually, sharing doesn’t work at all. I have to copy the link provided and share that to others. It isn’t a bad thing, it is just that there is an option for sharing to things like Facebook or Google Plus, but they don’t actually work. Yet.

Update: The sharing functionality now works as it would be expected to! Once again, the Centrallo team is very quick when it comes to user concerns and suggestions..

The Bad

There really isn’t anything that bad. The only thing I miss is a checklist type function. You can make lists, but there is no real way to make it a checklists.

In order to make a checklist, I have to use lists and notes. From there, I change all items that are done to one color and the items not done to another color. It is a crude but effect solution.

You can always archive or delete items that are done, but I prefer to keep them so that I know what I have and haven’t accomplished.

Interface

The Good

Material design! Really, is there anything else to say about it? A year after Android L previews and material design debuted, material design is still hard to come by. Only two of my daily apps have material design implemented excluding Google apps and including Centrallo.

The interface is snappy and beautiful. It actually makes the app even more enjoyable to use.

The Middle Ground

There really isn’t middle ground to be had about material design. Some love it, some hate it. Some really don’t care. It is just kind of like “Tada, I’m pretty now!”, and Centrallo is definitely that, pretty.

The Bad

The update to material design removes the ability to change the color scheme. That isn’t a big deal though because the current look is amazing and has no need to change.

Only other thing I have to complain about is the timing. Really? An entire year? Oh well, I guess it takes time to look this good.

Screenshot_20150604-231844[1]
Screenshot_20150604-231758[1]
Screenshot_20150604-231754[1]
Screenshot_20150604-231744[1]

The post Organize your life with Centrallo, a fresh look appeared first on AndroidGuys.

4
Jun

PowerSkin Pop’n 3 review


I

put the new PowerSkin Pop’n 3 through its paces, recently. Pop’n 3 is a new (to me) take on portable smartphone chargers. It boasts “state-of-the-art, patented dual suction adhering technology to stick right onto the back of smartphones for an easy to hold, seamlessly integrated charging experience.”

6166dGurxcL._SL1236_Simply put, the Pop’n 3 sticks to the back of your phone via a center sticky pad and 24 mini suction cups. The coolest, most practical feature isn’t even that, but the attached power connector (Micro-USB in this case, but they also have an iOS Lightning version). Since the power cable is attached to the unit, you’ll never lose the cable. It’s also only long enough to reach from the bottom of the Pop’n 3 to your phone and fits into a slot at the bottom, eliminating the hassle of the power getting tangled in anything.

In “real life” usage, the suction did a competent job of holding on and charging while I made calls and performed other tasks on the phone. After a few attachments and removals, however, there suction begins to weaken. The manual suggests moistening the center sticky pad to rejuvenate the unit’s hold, which did work, but each time the hold felt a little weaker than before.

A big, big “con” to this unit, and one they should have either addressed or at least mentioned, is the suction is completely useless if you have a protective phone case on your Android. In my case it was an Otter Box, and the Pop’n gave 0% hold to the case. Taking off your phone case is the first step to having a busted phone or shattered screen so this isn’t worth the risk – when the case was on my phone, I just charged the phone without attaching the Pop’n.61jVyYxL0AL._SL1500_

Charging the unit itself is done via a provided Micro-USB cable. It would have been nice if the inbound charging cable was also attached and retractable, since these tend to get borrowed/swiped around these parts. Charging speed was pretty average, but another great feature is that you can have the Pop’n’s outgoing charger connected to your phone, and its incoming charger attached to a power source, and the charge will pass through (and charge your phone first, then itself). This is perfect if you can remember to leave them both hooked up together and charge them both up overnight.

At its current price, $39.99 on PowerSkin’s site or $49.99 on Amazon, the Pop’n 3, drawbacks and all, is still a great deal compared to other, more well-known, portable chargers such as the Mophie series. If your case is compatible with the suction system or you don’t mind going without a phone case to use this unit, it’s certainly worth adding to your day-to-day mobile artillery.

– Chris S.

http://ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&OneJS=1&Operation=GetAdHtml&MarketPlace=US&source=ss&ref=ss_til&ad_type=product_link&tracking_id=andrguys-20&marketplace=amazon&region=US&placement=B00RMPCAL8&asins=B00RMPCAL8&linkId=SPNSEZ67PCOXJRNI&show_border=true&link_opens_in_new_window=true

The post PowerSkin Pop’n 3 review appeared first on AndroidGuys.

4
Jun

Android Auto Review – Hyundai Sonata 2015


In Google’s attempt to be a part of almost every aspect of your life, they are now moving into the automotive realm, and while it took more than a year, if the recent mention at Google I/O 2015 is any indication, we can expect to find Android Auto in a slew of vehicles by the end of 2016. Last week, Hyundai announced that they were the first car manufacturer to feature Android Wear on production vehicles, starting with the Hyundai Sonata 2015, which is what we have on hand today.

We find out exactly what it brings to the table, or rather, to the car, in this in-depth Android Auto review!

Android Auto Features

android auto hyundai sonata aa (2 of 9)

Before getting started, it has to be mentioned that there are two versions of the Hyundai Sonata that can be seen in the video above. The silver car is the one that features Android Auto, but I was also sent a white version about a month ago, which didn’t come with Android Auto, but helped me familiarize myself with the other features of the Sonata that were already built-in.

android auto review aa (13 of 16)

Android Auto isn’t an independent system, and does require the phone to be connected to the in-built system in the car, which is done using a microUSB cable, and not Bluetooth as some might expect. Pairing the phone to the system is very simple via the Android Auto app that can be downloaded from the Google Play Store. The Play Store also features a list of apps that work with Android Auto, and is also the case with Android Wear, if an app you already have installed on your phone is compatible, it will automatically show up on the dashboard menu.

android auto review aa (3 of 16)

The Android Auto interface is fairly simplistic, taking on the familiar form of Google Now cards. If you have searched for any locations using Google or Google Now, or have any locations, such as Home or Work, already saved, those particular cards will show up, tapping on which will begin navigation to that destination. Of course, the full functionality of Google Now isn’t there, but apart from navigation, other key information such as missed calls, messages, and weather at your location are all available.

android auto review aa (1 of 16)

Jumping over to the media side of things, any compatible apps that are installed on your phone will show up on the list, which in my case, include Google Play Music, HeartRadio, NPR One, and Pocket Casts, the interfaces of which are also in a more basic form. For example, opening Google Play Music gives you direct access to player controls, with a menu on the left corner available to navigate through the various options such as Playlists, Albums, Listen Now, and more.

android auto review aa (5 of 16)

When it comes to the call functions, tapping on the phone button shows you a list of contacts, with the most recent call information at the top, followed by all the Starred contacts, giving you quick and easy access to anyone you might want to get in touch with. The menu gives you the option to access your call history, view missed calls, dial a number, or listen to your voicemail. Tapping on the microphone icon at the top right corner allows you to use voice commands to call a person as well, just as you would using Google Now on your phone.

Performance

android auto review aa (12 of 16)

When the car is parked, you can type out and search for a destination, but voice control is available here as well. Just say the name of the location, and once Google finds out, you can start navigation. The Google Maps section has a menu as well, with sections including categories, suggestions, and traffic information.

android auto review aa (11 of 16)

As mentioned, making a call is very simple, and the call quality is as good as expected. What is interesting though, and very useful, is how Android Auto handles text messages. When receiving a message, it shows up as a heads up notification, and when you click on it, the messages will be read out to you, including, hilariously, emoticons. Tapping on the microphone button and saying reply will let you answer the last message you received, using voice dictation to do so.

android auto review aa (6 of 16)

As you may have seen in the video, using Android Auto can lead to some frustration, because of the dependency on your phone and its internet connection. If you’re phone isn’t working, or you are in a location with a spotty wireless connection, the functionality of Android Auto is severely limited as well. That said, when it does work, it works really well, and sending a text message is also fairly uncomplicated.

Is it worth it?

android auto review aa (9 of 16)

The big question with regards to Android Auto is whether it is that much better than the navigation and infotainment systems already in place, which is honestly a very difficult question to answer. When it comes to the built-in system of the Sonata, you can connect your phone to it via Bluetooth, giving you easy access to the media on your phone. Also useful is the steering wheel integration, letting you control everything from it.

android auto review aa (10 of 16)

Android Auto does let you change the application you are using, so if you were listening to music and wanted to switch over to a podcast, that can easily be done using Android Auto. Answering and making calls is also very easy to do, but text messaging isn’t possible with the Hyundai system, which is a plus for Android Auto.

android auto review aa (8 of 16)

The navigation system also seems more robust with the built-in system, with a lot more options available within easy access. Similar options are available with Android Auto as well, but does require a few extra taps to go into the menu and find the various categories, and the implementation on the built-in system is a lot better. Android Auto is wholly dependent on your Google searches, while the Hyundai system is a lot more fleshed out, with maps that can be updated using SD cards, and location searches also powered by Google, without having to rely on your phone to do everything.

android auto review aa (15 of 16)

Car manufacturers have spent years building robust navigation and infotainment systems for their vehicles that do a great job. Android Auto doesn’t seem to bring much more to the table, and for now, isn’t much more than a very nice add-on. If you’re looking to do everything the Google way, the option is available to you, but if you’re already having a good time with the built-in navigation system, Android Auto, in its current iteration, isn’t yet ready to completely replace what is already available.

Galleries

Android Auto

Hyundai Sonata

Final Thoughts

android auto review aa (14 of 16)

So there you have it for this in-depth look at Android Auto! The version that is seen in the video is what you’ll get with all other car manufacturers as well, and that is a nice feature of Android Auto. While Android Auto isn’t quite ready to be a complete replacement for what is already available, it does bring some useful features to the table, such as media app integration and text messaging using voice dictation, which can be great tools while on the road. Some polish is certainly required, but Android Auto is still in its very early stages, and will only get better over time.

4
Jun

Soen Audio Transit XS – One of the best portable speakers you can buy


If you are a follower of Androidguys, you know we review a lot of bluetooth speakers.  It is one of the most popular accessories for mobile devices that you can buy, and therein lies the problem. There are hundreds of speakers to choose from and the freedom to choose can be time intensive if you want to spend your money wisely.

I’ve used at least 10 different bluetooth speakers over the past couple of years, and I can say, if portability is your most important factor when buying a speaker, then this speaker is the one to buy. In general, many speakers are relatively small, but are simply too big to carry around on a regular basis.  If it can’t fit in your pocket, then it just isn’t that portable unless you want to throw the speaker in a backpack or purse wherever you go.  That’s where the Soen Audio Transit XS Ultra Slim speaker fits in.  When you think of “ultra slim” you tend to think of devices like the Macbook Air, Samsung Galaxy S6, or the Samsung Tab S.  Those devices are really thin.  If you think the Soen Audio Transit XS is going to be that thin, then think again.  Its thickness measures at 1 inch, which is not thin for a phone or a tablet, but it is really thin for a bluetooth speaker.  It isn’t quite the slimmest bluetooth speaker on the market, but it is thin enough to throw into a back pocket, and that is definitely portable if it can fit into pocket at a meager weight of only .6lb.  Compare that to the Bose Soundlink Mini at a hefty 1.5 pounds, and you’ll realize the Bose speaker needs to go on a diet.

Drivers(speakers) require space to drive sound and that is why it is hard to shrink bluetooth speakers.  For as small as the Soen Audio Transit speaker is, it doesn’t sacrifice on loudness or sound quality.  It isn’t as loud and it doesn’t have the detail of some of the larger speakers, but that is to be expected as this is a small device.  Surprisingly, the bass response is actually quite nice, and that is due to the patented Momentum Port on the side of the speaker that allows for that chamber to let the bass flow.  Soen takes pride in their revolutionary acoustic technologies and I see no fault in that as the speaker truly does deliver rich sound.

Given the small size, the Transit doesn’t have a ton of room for a large battery but it does support up to 8 hours of playback.  In my tests(not at all scientific) I averaged about 6-7 hours of use, but that is probably due to the fact that I play my music loud.  The battery life is respectable, but nothing to write home about.  Four mini LED lights show the battery level on the side of the speaker which is nice so you know when to recharge.  As with most portable speakers, Soen sticks with the micro-usb standard for charging so you won’t need to lug a proprietary charger around with you.

Another simple feature, yet highly important, is the easy-mount connector.  The Transit comes with a standard mount that attaches to 1/4″ camera mounts, which means you can use any standard mount that is used for photography.  There are tons of mounts that would allow you to strap this speaker to a bike, motorcycle, or even a tree for when you are outdoors.

Being that the Transit is designed for true portability, they coated the speaker with a protective rubber armor.  The feel of the rubber is very nice and provides plenty of grip.  The Transit comes in five colors, red, black, white, blue and purple, and can be had for $129.95.    I have no doubts this speaker will stand up to being dragged around with me due to the superior and thoughtful build quality.

Overall, for a speaker of this size, the Soen Transit XS is an incredible device if you are looking in the portable speaker category.  By portable, I mean it can be thrown into a pocket.  I have not heard a better performing speaker of this size, most in this size range sound tinny and distorted at higher volumes.  The Transit XS has full sound, including incredible bass response.  On top of great sound quality you get a well thought out build with the rubber coating and ability to mount this speaker to standard mounts.  The Transit comes in five colors, red, black, white, blue and purple, and can be had for $129.95.    I have no doubts that this speaker will stand up to being dragged around with me, due to the superior and thoughtful build quality.

I used the speaker for 6 weeks before writing this review.

You can purchase the Soen Transit-XS on Amazon.com or directly through Soen Audio.

 

The post Soen Audio Transit XS – One of the best portable speakers you can buy appeared first on AndroidGuys.

3
Jun

Battle of Toys: an easy to play fighting game (review)


battle of toys logoHave your ever imagined what would happen if toys came alive? Well, this is not Toy Story. How about raging toys with heated battles, beating the plastic parts off each other? Sounds cool, doesn’t it? Battle of Toys is exactly what you need.

A 3D turn based battle game which will take you on adventure filled trip to the world of toys. Starting off with one toy, players can build up their collection buying from a wide selection of killer toys with a huge selection of upgrades and costumes to improve the attack power. The controls are very simple and require reflex based actions to execute them successfully.

Players enter into a 30 second battle and are required to stop the indicator in one of the green zones to trigger an attack. There are three indicator styles that appear randomly in battle. It also contains several interactive mini-games, that pop-up to help maximize the damage of a combo after triggering an attack.

Since there is no defensive ability in the game, players have the option to switch characters mid-battle allowing a team of up to 6 toys, which can be strategically used to win the battle.

battle of toys (3)

Each battle earns the player some coins and sometimes, the more desired, diamonds. Different battle locations keep up the spice of the game. Difficulty level of the game can be adjusted to gain greater coin rewards, but there is no indicator telling how the current toy will fare in the battle. Upgrades and special combos are a must as players progress through the story.

New toys can be purchased using the coins earned in the battles, but the best toys can be purchased by using a large number of diamonds only (bought using in-app purchases) which seems a bit pushy. Even though there is a leaderboard, there is no multiplayer option to play with friends or have a random online battle.

battle of toys (6)

Although, it lacks a definitive storyline, the game is still fun to play. Battle of Toys is simply a fast paced fighting game without the complexities of similar titles like Injustice or Mortal Kombat, which contain elaborate upgrades and exhaustive gameplay. Nevertheless, its a good way to kill time and beat some toys in the process.

What we liked:

  • Quick to start playing
  • Graphics are nice
  • Controls are simple and easy to learn
  • Enjoyable gameplay

What needs improvement:

  • More ways to earn diamonds
  • Multiplayer support
  • Character customization
  • No definitive storyline

Did you check out Battle of Toys? Tell us what you thought in the comments!

Screenshots

Battle of Toys
Battle of Toys
Battle of Toys
Battle of Toys
Battle of Toys
Battle of Toys
Battle of Toys
Battle of Toys

The post Battle of Toys: an easy to play fighting game (review) appeared first on AndroidGuys.