ASUS’ photo-centric ZenFones head to India first
Back at Computex in June, we got a first glimpse of ASUS’ upcoming ZenFone Selfie and the then-unnamed ZenFone 2 Laser, both being the first phones to switch back to Qualcomm’s chipset after ASUS’ streak of Intel-powered mobile devices. Today, the company has finally chosen India as the first country to get the Selfie and the Laser, as well as a few surprise devices. Let’s talk about the Laser first: It’s obviously all about the speedy laser auto-focus on the 13-megapixel, f/2.0 main camera with dual-tone flash. Its also comes in three sizes: 5 inches (not launching in India just yet), 5.5 inches (from 9,999 Rupees or about $160) and 6 inches (from 17,999 Rupees or about $280); all with Gorilla Glass 4 and resolution of up to 1080p. Chipset-wise, these models range from the low-end quad-core Snapdragon 410 with 2GB RAM up to the octa-core Snapdragon 615 with 3GB RAM.
As for the Selfie, it’s essentially the 5.5-inch version of the Laser slapped with a more powerful front-facing wide-angle camera: 13-megapixel resolution and f/2.2 aperture, but no laser on this side. It’s powered by an octa-core Snapdragon 615 chipset and retails for 15,999 Rupees or about $250.

Launching alongside the Selfie and the Laser is the ZenFone 2 Deluxe, which is quite the looker thanks to its cool multifaceted polygonal back covers (hopefully ASUS will sell these separately for existing ZenFone 2 users). Underneath that, it’s just the top spec ZenFone 2 with 128GB of internal storage, 4GB RAM, a 2.3GHz 64-bit Intel Atom chip and the same-old fast charge technology — from zero to 60 percent in just 39 minutes. This one goes for 22,999 Rupees or about $360 which is pretty aggressive, especially given that the OnePlus 2 comes with just 3GB of RAM and 16GB of built-in storage for the same price in India.
For those who are looking for a new Android tablet, ASUS is also bringing the affordable Intel-powered ZenPads to India, with the 7-inch model going for 11,999 Rupees or about $190, and the 8-inch version for 14,999 Rupees or about $240. Better yet, for an extra 3,000 Rupees (about $50), you can get the quirky Audio Cover for some surround sound action on these slates.
Filed under:
Cellphones, Tablets, Mobile, ASUS
Tags: android, asus, india, intel, mobilepostcross, phone, smartphone, tablet, zenfone, zenfone 2 deluxe, zenfone 2 laser, zenfone max, zenfone selfie, zenpad, zenui
ASUS put an insanely large battery in the ZenFone Max
During its big launch event in India today, ASUS decided to throw in a surprise for those who are into phones with a massive battery: the ZenFone Max. This is one of the very few smartphones that come with a generous — or perhaps overly generous — 5,000 mAh cell, and you can even use the phone as a power bank to charge other devices. Like the ZenFone 2 Laser, the Max has a 13-megapixel f/2.0 main camera with laser auto-focus plus dual-tone LED flash, as well as a 5-megapixel front-facing imager and Gorilla Glass 4 on the 5.5-inch screen, though there’s no word on the display resolution. The downer is the entry-level Snapdragon 410 chip with just 2GB of RAM, as if the battery life isn’t already long enough.
Alas, it’ll be a while until the ZenFone Max enters the market in October, so ASUS is keeping other details — including the price — under wraps for now. But just for reference, Gionee’s mid-range Marathon M4 has the same battery capacity and goes for 15,499 Rupees or about $240, and then there’s the $290 Innos D6000 with an even bigger 6,000 mAh battery plus a slightly more powerful Snapdragon 615 chip, so it’ll be a tough fight for ASUS.
Filed under:
Cellphones, Mobile, ASUS
Tags: android, asus, india, mobilepostcross, phone, smartphone, zenfone max, zenui
ASUS ZenWatch now on sale for $129.99 through Best Buy and Amazon
The ASUS ZenWatch is now on sale for $129.99 through Best Buy and Amazon. While the ASUS ZenWatch 2 is available, the original ZenWatch is still a great performer, especially at this price point.
While it’s always fun to have the latest and greatest, the ZenWatch is perfect for those that still aren’t sure about smartwatches. It works well and it’s cheap, making it a low-risk for those that want to take Android Wear for a test.
As a quick refresher, the ASUS ZenWatch features a 320 x 320 AMOLED display, a Snapdragon 400 CPU, 512MB of RAM, 4GB of internal storage, and it’s running Android Wear 5.1.1.
The device previously went through a short and similar sale like this on the Google Store.
Even though it has a successor, it’s still a premium looking smartwatch and has a classy feel to it. However, if you’re looking for something for style, it might be best to hold off and wait for the Huawei Watch.
Either way, if you want to pick yourself up a ZenWatch, be sure to hit one of the source links below.
Come comment on this article: ASUS ZenWatch now on sale for $129.99 through Best Buy and Amazon
Deal: ASUS ZenWatch available for just $129.99 from Best Buy and Amazon

Last month the original ZenWatch was offered on the Google Store for just $129.99, a significant discount from the normal $199.99 asking price. At the time it was unclear if this was a permanent or temporary price cut, but it turned out to be the later. If you missed this opportunity, the good news is that Amazon and Best Buy are now offering the ZenWatch for the same discounted price of $129.99.
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;
While the ZenWatch was usurped by the ZenWatch 2 not too long ago, the original is still a great looking watch and could be well worth the money if you’ve been considering picking up your first Android Wear device but don’t want to commit a ton of money.
Don’t miss: Our list of the best Android Wear smartwatches
As a recap, the ASUS ZenWatch features a 320×320 AMOLED display, a Snapdragon 400 processor, 512MB of RAM and 4GB of internal storage. It was also one of the first Android Wear devices to receive the big Android 5.1.1 update, bringing along with it a ton of notable features. The ZenWatch also comes with a premium feeling leather band, which still makes it one of the best-looking Android Wear devices on the market.
If you’re interested in picking one up for yourself, be sure to check out our full review. For those ready to buy, you can grab the watch from Amazon or Best Buy now!
ASUS Zenfone 2E review
Earlier this year, ASUS surprised us with a fantastic device with their flagship Zenfone 2, which has received a lot of appreciation from the tech world and consumers alike. Joining the three variants of the ASUS Zenfone 2 is another entry-level edition, dubbed the Zenfone 2E, that will be available from AT&T exclusively for their prepaid GoPhone customers. With its much lower price point, and specifications reflecting that, how does budget-friendly Zenfone 2E fare? We find out in this review!
Design

Despite its smaller size, the Zenfone 2E retains a lot of the design language of its flagship counterparts. Like its larger sibling, the power button is placed up top, which does feel a little out of place given that most phones now have it on the sides, but given the overall smaller size of the Zenfone 2E, it isn’t hard to reach.

The volume rocker is on the back, and while the implementation isn’t as refined as on LG’s smartphones, it is still well positioned, allowing for the index finger to land easily on the buttons. The rocker doesn’t offer as much of a tactile feel as we would have liked, but there have been no issues with input throughout my usage. Even the front buttons are all capacitive, with a small faux brushed metal area underneath them, giving the phone a little extra texture.

A much appreciated design feature of this phone is the removable back cover, allowing users to swap between the available white and black options. The back cover is easy to remove, and underneath it is where the slots for the SIM card and the microSD card can be found.

Though the 5.5-inch Zenfone 2 didn’t feel cumbersome despite its larger size, the smaller footprint of the Zenfone 2E obviously makes for a far better handling experience. The curve on the back is also a contributing factor, as the device sits really well in the palm, and helps angle the phone for side to side operations. The design of the Zenfone 2E is best described as spartan, with its lack of any obvious bells and whistles around the body. But the device retains all the nice design elements of the Zenfone 2, and we think GoPhone customers will appreciate it.
Display

The smaller display comes with a smaller resolution, but casual users won’t have much to complain about, as far as the performance of the display is concerned. The 5-inch IPS LCD display comes with a 720p resolution, resulting in a pixel density of 294 ppi. This is lower than on the Zenfone 2, but it makes perfect sense considering the price of this device. The lower pixel density reduces the sharpness for text reading, but it isn’t the worst performer that we’ve seen.

That said, the difference in overall quality is noticeable when compared to the Full HD and Quad HD screens out there, but that is nothing to fault this budget-friendly device for. Viewing angles happen to be pretty good, and the general color temperature tends to be on the warmer side. This can be changed with a built-in screen color mode selector, where you can chooses between some preset options or manually adjust the temperature. Text loses a bit of sharpness with the drop in resolution though, making this, at best, a decent performer in the scope of the total market.

Colors remain pretty good, and brightness does benefit from the underlying IPS technology, allowing for an enjoyable media consumption experience, as long as you aren’t looking for the most clarity or highest resolution. As a budget GoPhone, having a 720p resolution screen is pretty standard, making the Zenfone 2E the kind of performer the frugal user will be happy with.
Performance

Under the hood, the Zenfone 2E packs a dual-core Intel Atom Z2560, backed by the PowerVR SGX544MP2 GPU and 1 GB of RAM. This processing package is a big step down from the one found with the Zenfone 2. It’s easy to blame it for the less than ideal performance, but the paltry 1GB of RAM has a lot to do with it as well, potentially causing frustration even for the most casual of users.

A measure of stutter is observed even in the homescreens, and there is a delay when attempting to load most applications. It’s understandable that graphic-intensive games don’t work all that well here, but it’s a bit disheartening to see that even a middle-of-the-road game like Combo Crew crash consistently. We don’t really see more than just the typical point and click games like Candy Crush working on a consistent basis here, and, depending on what games you play, your experience may vary. It’s not surprising that an app cleaner is prominently shown in the recent apps screen and the notification dropdown, and of course, there are some limits to what this phone’s processing power can handle.
Hardware

The entry-level nature of the Zenfone 2E is apparent from other specifications as well, starting with the substandard 8 GB of built-in storage, which can be filled up very easily. Fortunately, a microSD card slot is available for expandable storage of up to 64 GB, which you will definitely have to rely on for your media and picture storing needs.

Since the Zenfone 2E is available exclusively from AT&T, connections and call quality is dependent on the strength of the network in your area. In my experience, phone calls were quite clear with no drops, and the 4G LTE network was reliable. The device also packs a standard suite of other connectivity options, with the exception of NFC. The rear facing speaker is pretty standard fare, offering a somewhat tinny noise that doesn’t get too loud, and lacks in the lower-middle to lower ends.

When it comes to the battery, the 2,500 mAh unit performs about as well as expected. While not the largest battery capacity, the lower-end specifications and 720p display help make this battery last for at least a single day of work, and possibly even more with light usage and activated power saving modes. Heavier usage, like using GPS navigation and music streaming, may result in you needing to reach for the charger before the end of your day though. While the battery isn’t a terrible performer, you will probably find yourself scrambling for ways to have power in order to get through the day.
Camera

The Zenfone 2E packs an 8 MP rear camera, and features some extra modes that might not be expected with an entry-level smarpthone, such as HDR, a miniature mode, and even a smart removal mode, along with videos modes that include a timelapse at 1080p resolution. While self-portraits can be taken using the 2 MP front-facing camera, the dedicated selfie mode using the rear shooter is great. Using user-defined face detection, the rear facing camera will snap three photos based on how many faces it finds, and this will be a pretty good mode to use for anyone that wants a better selfie from this phone.

Image quality is unfortunately, but expectedly, low. Sharpness is poor, made much worse when zooming in, and colors are quite muted, with brighter parts of pictures typically getting blown out. HDR tends to be a better choice in these situations, as it does lower exposure a bit on those blown out spots but, more importantly, adds a healthy amount of saturation to all colors.

What probably hurts the experience the most is the slower speed of capture. It takes a long time between the moment you press the shutter button and the moment the image is saved, not to mention that the slow shutter speed often adds blur to photos that already lack in sharpness. Videos show the same problems, especially blowing out highlights, and showcasing that shutter speed that results in high stutter throughout. For capturing the moment, the camera of the Zenfone 2E tries to be a good companion, but quality remains proportional to the low price that this phone comes at.
Software

On the software side of things, the Zen UI brings its generally oversaturated interface to this budget-minded device, providing a lot of features that the casual user might not really take advantage of. There are the different customization apps, like the screen color tweaker, and a bunch of tools, including even a Do It Later task app. Customizations continue with plenty of options for the homescreens, including icon packs, different animations for scrolling, and smart grouping of applications in the app screen.

All of this is on top of the Android 5.0.1 Lollipop, so Material Design elements are given a much more colorful and somewhat cartoony feel. Though perhaps that impression can be due to the 720p display, which can make items look a little more bloated that displays with higher resolutions.

What is most striking about the Zen UI is that it tries to provide a lot of options no matter where you are in the interface. But, with lower specifications and only 1GB of RAM, having so many options might not make a lot of sense, because the device can only really run so much before slowing down. As we keep saying, the highly casual daily user will find the Zenfone 2E to be a decent overall performer, but going the extra mile is not what this budget GoPhone was made for.
Specifications
| Display | 5-inch IPS LCD display 720p resolution, 294 ppi |
| Processor | 1.6 GHz dual-core Intel Atom Z2560 processor PowerVR SGX544MP2 GPU |
| Storage | 8 GB expandable via microSD up to 64 GB |
| RAM | 1 GB |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi b/g/n Bluetooth 4.0 GPS microUSB 2.0 |
| Software | Android 5.0 Lollipop |
| Camera | 8 MP rear camera with LED flash 2 MP front-facing camera with wide angle lens |
| Battery | 2,500 mAh |
| Colors | black, white |
| Dimensions | 148.1 x 71.4 x 10.9 mm 155.1 grams |
Gallery
Pricing and final thoughts
At a very affordable $119.99, the price point is definitely the best aspect of the ASUS Zenfone 2E, making this one of the easiest entry points into the world of Android. Not a lot of smartphones feature such a low price tag, and even those that are commonly considered budget-friendly, including the Moto G, will set you back at least $50 more.

So there you have it for our look at the ASUS Zenfone 2E! This device is a good choice for the starter smartphone user that is looking to save money. While it is easy to criticize this smartphone for not going the extra mile compared to the competition and the higher-end market, that’s not the point of the Zenfone 2E. Rather, this is for the user that needs the cheapest way to experience a smartphone without breaking the bank. Granted, you do get what you paid for, but, for the casual gamer, the occasional media streamer, and the user that needs a cell phone with smartphone capabilities, the Asus Zenfone 2E is one of the cheapest ways to get there.
Asus ZenWatch on sale for $130 at Best Buy
If you’ve been waiting for current Android smartwatches to become more affordable before jumping on board, you may now want to consider the Asus ZenWatch. It is currently listed at Best Buy online for $129.99, down $70 from the regular price.
There’s no word on how long this deal will last, so better decide if you think this might be the one for you.
To recap the specs, we’re looking at:
- Display: 1.63″ 320×320 AMOLED
- SoC: Snapdragon 400 (1.2 GHz)
- Memory: 512 MB of RAM
- Storage: 4GB
- Features: 2.5D curved Gorilla Glass 3, Water resistance with IP55 rating
- Color: Silver and rose gold, with brown leather strap
- OS: Android Wear
For reference, the price is at $173 on Amazon, so Best Buy has a good deal going here.
Source: Best Buy
The post Asus ZenWatch on sale for $130 at Best Buy appeared first on AndroidGuys.
We have the ASUS ZenFone 2E: ask us anything!

There’s plenty of content on the ASUS ZenFone 2 out there, but not everyone knows about the ZenFone 2E. This AT&T prepaid phone was announced with a $119.99 price point, surely a cost that will raise some eyebrows. It’s much cheaper than the average ZenFone 2, which was already considered super affordable!
Is there a catch? Will this phone fulfill your needs? It does sport a nice set of specs for the price, including an Intel Atom processor, 1 GB of RAM and a 5.0-inch screen. It could be the perfect phone for the casual user who doesn’t like contracts.
#gallery-1
margin: auto;
#gallery-1 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;
#gallery-1 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-1 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Curious about the phone? You will want to keep it tuned to Android Authority. Our very own Joshua Vergara got a hold of this device and is getting ready to put a review together. Meanwhile, we just wanted to take the time and let you ask us anything about the ZenFone 2E. If you want to know any specific details about the handset, just hit up our ASUS ZenFone 2E forum page and shoot us any questions. Josh and other Android Authority team members will be checking in frequently. You can also leave your doubts here and we will do our best to clear them!
Mid-range smackdown: Oppo R7, Samsung A7, Asus ZenFone 2, and Sony Xperia M4 Aqua

OPPO R7, the company’s mid-range champion.
Not too long ago, it was surprisingly difficult to find an unlocked, capable smartphone for an affordable price point. To get a mobile device that worked properly, it wasn’t uncommon that users would need to spend anywhere around $500-$800. Luckily for everyone, a number of device manufacturers have been releasing smartphones that are capable of handling everyday tasks, but still won’t break the bank.
Specifically, lesser known but rapidly growing smartphone companies such as OPPO and Asus have been releasing some great devices, and so have well-known manufacturers like Samsung and Sony. But how do the most prominent mid-tier smartphones from these companies compare? While this is not a complete list by any means, we decided to pit just a few mid-range handsets against one another to see how they fare.
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;
Specifications
Today we’ll be comparing the OPPO R7, Samsung Galaxy A7, ASUS ZenFone 2, and the Sony Xperia M4 Aqua. It should be noted early on that we haven’t reviewed the Galaxy A7, though given its comparable specifications to the competition, we thought it to be a good device to add to the comparison. Although these smartphones bring somewhat similar specifications and price points to the table, many of them still differ from one another when it comes to overall user experience. Before we get too far into the details, let’s take a look at the specification list below:
| OPPO R7 | Samsung Galaxy A7 (A700FD) | Sony Xperia M4 Aqua | ASUS ZenFone 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.0-inch Super AMOLED display with 1080 x 1920 resolution | 5.5-inch Super AMOLED display with 1080 x 1920 resolution | 5.0-inch IPS LCD display with 720 x 1280 resolution | 5.5-inch IPS LCD display with 1080 x 1920 resolution |
| Processor | 1.5 GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 | 1.5 GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 | 2.3GHz quad-core Intel Atom Z3580 (4GB RAM), 1.8GHz quad-core Intel Atom Z3560 (2GB RAM) |
| RAM | 3GB | 2GB | 2GB | 2/4GB |
| Storage | 16GB, expandable up to 128GB | 16GB, expandable up to 64GB | 8/16GB, expandable up to 128GB | 16/32/64GB, expandable up to 64GB |
| GPU | Adreno 305 | Adreno 405 | Adreno 405 | PowerVR G6430 |
| Camera | 13MP rear f/2.2 8MP front-facing f/2.4 |
13MP rear camera 5MP front camera |
13 MP rear camera 5MP front camera |
13MP rear camera 5MP front camera |
| Software | Color OS 2.1, Android 4.4.2 KitKat | Samsung TouchWiz, Android 5.0.2 Lollipop | Android 5.0 Lollipop | Zen UI, Android 5.0 Lollipop |
| Battery | 2,320mAh, non-removable | 2,600mAh, non-removable | 2,400mAh, non-removable | 3,000mAh, non-removable |
| Dimensions | 143 x 71 x 6.3mm, 147g | 151 x 76.2 x 6.3mm, 141g | 145.5 x 72.6 x 7.3mm, 136g | 152.5 x 77.2 x 10.9mm, 170g |
| Fast charging | Yes | No | No | Yes |
Display

Bringing a great price tag and solid specs, the Asus ZenFone 2 is one of the best mid-range options on the market.
To begin, let’s talk about the display. Mid-tier smartphones have come a long way on the display front, with many options now hitting the market with Full HD panels – and that’s true for the ZenFone 2, the Oppo R7 and the Samsung Galaxy A7. The big difference between these displays, however, is that the R7 and A7 both feature Super AMOLED displays instead of an LCD. AMOLED vs. LCD is still an ongoing debate, but much of the time you’ll find more vivid colors with AMOLED technology and there are certainly a number of folks that prefer AMOLED over LCD.
Unfortunately, Sony chose to go with a 5.0-inch 720p panel on their device, which might upset a few users hoping to get the clear 1080p resolution out of their mid-tier smartphone. Even though having a device with a lower resolution display might result in a tad better battery life, we’re sure most users would choose Full HD over this option if given the chance.
Performance

With a Snapdragon 615, the OPPO R7 stands towards the top when it comes to performance.
When it comes to performance, none of these smartphones are particularly poor at handling everyday tasks, though a few still manage to stand out from the rest. The OPPO R7 and ZenFone 2 both performed really well in our full reviews, largely due to their impressive internals.
Featuring 3GB of RAM and a Snapdragon 615 CPU, the R7 is quite the competitor to the ZenFone 2 with 4GB of RAM and Atom Z3580 CPU. Both devices handle gaming quite well, and they do a great job at performing everyday tasks. The Snapdragon 615 found in both the R7 and A7 has proven itself to be quite a capable processor overtime, making both OPPO’s and Samsung’s offerings a great option for those looking for a device with a reliable processor. It should be noted, however, that we have not posted a full review of the A7, so we aren’t as informed on this device as we are with the others. As for the Atom Z3580, while it might perform similarly, Qualcomm processors tend to have better app compatibility and simply have a better rep (810 overheating drama aside).
Last on the list is the Xperia M4 Aqua. While this device features the same 615 processor found in the R7 and A7, our reviews have found that Sony’s offering tends to overheat relatively easily when playing games, which is one of our biggest points of contention with the device.
Camera

The M4 Aqua stands out when it comes to camera performance.
Oddly enough, all four of the devices we’re comparing today feature 13MP rear-facing cameras, though there’s still a big difference when it comes to image quality.
No matter which device you pick out of the lot, you won’t be disappointed in the camera department. But if you want a mid-range smartphone with a camera that stands above the rest, we’d suggest going with the Xperia M4 Aqua. In our full review, Sony’s offering consistently produced shots with great detail and with vivid colors. Sony’s camera app is quite simplistic and doesn’t come with too many features, though more can be downloaded separately.
Next up we have the OPPO R7 and ASUS ZenFone 2, which both produced average shots in our full reviews. Although we haven’t tested the A7’s camera for ourself, Samsung devices in the past have consistently produced well-balanced, accurate photos. Like most other smartphone cameras, these devices perform best in well-lit areas, with a noticeable decline in quality when moved into low-light situations. Ultimately, the R7 struggles in the post-processing department, while the ZenFone 2 fails to provide an acceptable amount of dynamic range.
All of the extras

One of Sony’s signature features is waterproofing, and so it is great to see this present in the Xperia M4 Aqua.
Design and build quality are two big areas where manufacturers are shifting focus in the mid-range market, and all four of these smartphones surely don’t disappoint on that front. Whether you choose to go with the familiar design language of Sony’s Xperia M4 Aqua or the premium-feeling OPPO R7, we’re sure most of you won’t have to sacrifice too much when it comes to overall design.
OEMs are also noticeably focusing on their software experiences, too. All of these devices feature software that’s been toned down significantly throughout the past few months, which has been a big pain point for mid-rangers in the past. OPPO’s simplified ColorOS provides a much smoother overall experience, while the ZenFone 2, Xperia M4 Aqua and Galaxy A7 are much more feature-rich than the others. When it comes to software, it ultimately comes down to which OEM skin you prefer, but you really can’t go wrong with any of these options.

Quick charging? Yes please!
All four of these devices come with non-removable batteries, but that actually may not be a deal breaker. These mid-range offerings can all last around a full day on a single charge, though not much more than that. What’s more, you don’t have to worry about running out of space on your device, because all of them also come with microSD card slots.
The differences begin to really stand out when we take into account other attractive features such as IP68 water and dust resistance or quick charging technology. For instance, I’d much rather recommend the Sony option to anyone who spends the majority of their summer days sitting next to the pool, but I’d rather recommend the OPPO R7 or ZenFone 2 to someone who needs to charge their battery in half the time thanks to integrated quick charging.
Pricing and final thoughts

OPPO R7’s design and performance put it towards the top of the list, though ZenFone 2 and the others follow close behind.
Choosing the right smartphone isn’t always an easy decision, and it can take some time to figure out what best suits your needs. Out of the pack, the OPPO R7 seemingly stands out above the rest if you’re looking for a powerful handset with an ultra-premium build and high-end features like quick charging. The ZenFone 2 certainly follows close behind, though many may be turned off by its choice of an Intel processor and its somewhat less attractive design (though that last point is completely subjective).
The Samsung Galaxy A7 also seems like a capable enough device, though we think it’s price tag may be too high for most users looking for a solid mid-range offering. As for the Sony Xperia M4 Aqua? Special features like waterproofing are great, though we certainly are a bit alarmed by the device’s apparent overheating issues.
Related: Best Android phones (June 2015)
All in all, this post is meant to condense our full reviews down to make it easier for you to decide on which phone is right for you. However, that’s not always the easiest way to get information across, so we’ve also linked our full reviews down below. Feel free to let us know which device you think is worth your hard-earned cash, and why the other smartphones won’t find their way into your pocket anytime soon.
More on these great devices
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;
Check out our full reviews:
ASUS Chromebook Flip review: small, solidly built, well-priced
I’m sick of reviewing Chromebooks. What was once the source of fierce debates about the future of computing is now a commodity: Most models have the same specs, the same internals and more or less perform the same. There are a lot of them, and most aren’t particularly good or particularly bad. They’re forgettable; unremarkable. That cranky preamble aside, I did want to test the Chromebook Flip. This machine, made by ASUS, is notable on a few counts. With a 10-inch screen, it’s one of the smallest around, even if it does hearken back to the days of the netbook. It’s one of the few with a 360-degree rotating touchscreen. The build quality is better than most, thanks to an all-metal chassis. The battery life is longer too, at 10.5 hours. Lastly, it’s cheap for what it is: just $249. Yes, there’s a catch — several, even — but all told, I recommend it anyway.
Hardware
![]()
I’m hardly the first person to compare Chromebooks to netbooks, but in this case, the comparison is apt: The Flip has a 10-inch screen and weighs less than two pounds, the same size as many of the first mini notebooks. The keyboard, too, is a throwback to ASUS’ Eee PC series, with small, island-style buttons, some of them not much bigger than a fingernail. In absolute terms, it’s not as comfortable to type on as the sort of keyboard you’d find on a larger machine. All things considered, though, the buttons feel generously spaced, considering the deck itself measures just 10.6 inches wide. None of the buttons are too small either — Enter, Shift and Backspace are all plenty big — and the underlying panel stands up well to vigorous typing. As it happens, I wrote much of this review on the Flip, not to mention: surfed the web and answered who-knows-how-many emails. Like I said, I don’t think I’ll ever prefer a 10-inch keyboard over, say, a 13-incher, but this one is at least decent. And if there’s anyone who can make a miniature keyboard people might actually want to use, it’s netbook granddaddy ASUS.
If there’s one way in which the Flip is different from netbooks of yore, it’s build quality. Forget the fact that netbooks never used to have 360-degree hinges like this, much less touchscreens — or that this form factor is still uncommon on modern-day Chromebooks. This thing is also more solidly built than I’d ever expect from a $249 machine. The machine is all metal, with subtle brushed detailing on the palm rest that both looks nice and helps mask smudges. I’ve also noticed that when I pick up the laptop in one hand — which I do often, since it’s so light — I don’t feel any flex in the palm rest where I’m gripping it.

The one exception to this durability seems to be the screen, which tends to wobble a bit. You might not notice it so much in everyday use, but I got a big taste of it when I used the Flip on a bumpy Amtrak trip; every time the train jostled, so did the panel. Speaking of the display, you sort of get what you pay for here. The 1,280 x 800 resolution isn’t as high as many standalone tablets at this size (many of which are more expensive anyway), and the bezels are unusually thick for a touchscreen. That said, colors are accurate and although the screen washes out when you dip it forward, the IPS panel did a good job minimizing glare when I used it next to an open window on my recent train ride.
Still, the hinge is sturdy enough that I felt confident flipping the screen back into tablet mode or — more likely — Tent and Stand modes. I say “more likely” because Chrome OS was primarily designed to be used with a mouse and keyboard — precisely why we’ve yet to see any proper tablets running the software. I personally didn’t have much use for it as a makeshift slate (although the screen size was about right). I do like having the option of putting the keyboard under and watching Netflix with the screen in front of me — a particularly handy feature in confined spaces like a cramped coach seat. Let’s be real, though: I mainly used this in classic notebook mode, and I didn’t even have to use the touchscreen much, just because the touchpad was already precise. Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad that the convertible form factor also happens to come with solid build quality, but I probably would have been just as happy to have a standard clamshell without a touchscreen.
Finishing our tour of the hardware, the Flip is well-stocked with ports, most of which are stacked along the right-hand side. These include two full-sized USB connections, a micro-HDMI socket, a microSD slot, a headphone jack and, on the other side, a volume rocker and power port.
Performance and battery life
| SunSpider v.1.0.2* | Google Octane | Mozilla Kraken* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASUS Chromebook Flip | 700ms |
6,748 |
5,527ms |
| Chromebook Pixel (2015, Core i5, Intel HD 5500) | 298ms |
23,907 |
1,428ms |
| Toshiba Chromebook 2 (Celeron N2840, 4GB RAM) | 967ms |
7,714 |
4,284ms |
| Samsung Chromebook 2 (11-inch, Celeron N2840, 2GB RAM) | 525ms |
7,223 |
3,936ms |
| Acer Chromebook 13 (NVIDIA Tegra K1, 2GB RAM) | 609ms |
7,051 |
4,816ms |
| Lenovo N20p (Celeron N2830, 2GB RAM) | 567ms |
7,288 |
4,287ms |
| ASUS C200 Chromebook (Celeron N2830, 2GB RAM) | 483ms |
7,198 |
4,291ms |
| Acer C720 Chromebook (Celeron 2955U, 2GB RAM) | 342ms |
11,502 |
2,614ms |
| Dell Chromebook 11 (Celeron 2955U, 4GB RAM) | 340ms |
11,533 |
2,622ms |
|
*SunSpider and Kraken: Lower scores are better. |
|||
Let’s recap: So far, we have a machine with mostly good build quality, a mediocre display and a low price. ASUS had to cut corners somewhere to make it all work, and it would appear that “somewhere” was performance. The Flip runs a quad-core Rockchip processor — a presumably cheaper option than the Intel Atom or NVIDIA Tegra chips that power most other Chromebooks. Though the base $249 model has 2GB of RAM, we recommend you pony up an extra $30 to get the 4GB edition, which is the one I tested. Even then, it’s still slower than other Chromebooks (not that any of them are really fast). In benchmarks, it trails machines like the Toshiba Chromebook 2 that have a newish Intel Celeron N2840 CPU, though its SunSpider JavaScript scores aren’t the worst we’ve seen. In everyday use, I was easily able to juggle 10 tabs at a time, but with the lack of screen real estate I often didn’t even want to push it that far.
Startup is pretty quick: about nine seconds to the login screen. The only odd thing there is that much of that time is actually eaten up by a long pause before you even see the “ASUS” splash screen. By the time you see the company’s logo flash before you, you’re actually almost done booting up.
As I said in my recent review of Google’s second-gen Chromebook Pixel, Chrome has become more usable as an OS, partly thanks to a steady stream of improvements to the software itself, and partly because more and more services are now available in the browser (think: Skype, Spotify, Photoshop and popular messaging apps like Slack). As for Chrome, Google has steadily expanded the list of things you can do offline, so that you no longer need an internet connection for Gmail, Google Calendar, Drive, Google Play Music or Google Play Movies & TV. Many third-party web apps such as Pocket and Amazon Kindle Cloud Reader are now offline-capable, and there’s even a section of the Chrome Web Store set aside for apps that don’t need an internet connection. As I always say, the Chromebook setup will never be for everyone; there will always be people who need a proper Windows PC or Mac to install apps like Steam or iTunes. But personally, I’ve found I can survive on Chrome alone much better than I could even a few years ago, and I’m sure many mainstream users would agree.
|
Battery life |
|
|---|---|
| ASUS Chromebook Flip | 10:49 |
| MacBook Air (13-inch, 2013) | 12:51 |
| HP Spectre x360 | 11:34 |
| Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, 2015) | 11:23 |
| ASUS C200 | 11:19 |
| Acer Chromebook 13 | 10:07 |
| Chromebook Pixel (2015) | 10:01 |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | 9:11 |
| Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus | 8:44 |
| Samsung Chromebook 2 (13-inch) | 8:22 |
| Apple MacBook (2015) | 7:47 |
| Dell XPS 13 (2015) | 7:36 |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro | 7:36 |
| Acer Aspire S7-392 | 7:33 |
| Lenovo LaVie Z | 7:32 |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | 7:08 |
| Lenovo LaVie Z 360 | 6:54 |
| Toshiba Chromebook 2 | 6:34 |
| Acer C720 Chromebook | 6:27 (Core i3) / 5:57 (Celeron) |
| ASUS Transformer Book T300 Chi | 5:51 (Quad HD)/6:14 (Full HD) |
The Flip is rated for nine hours of battery life, which I’d say is actually conservative estimate. In Engadget’s standard rundown test, which involves looping a full HD video at a fixed screen brightness, the machine lasted 10 hours and 49 minutes. In other words, it outlasted me in what was already a very long workday. With a more conservative screen setting and more intermittent use, I’m sure you could do even better. Even so, that nearly 11-hour showing is better than most Chromebooks we’ve seen, even battery life champs like the Acer Chromebook 13 and Google’s latest “Pixel.” Other than those two outliers, there’s otherwise a steep drop-off between the Flip and other Chromebooks, with some models struggling to even break seven hours. Basically, then, the Flip might be underpowered compared to the competition, but it makes up for it with outstanding endurance.
Wrap-up

As I said from the outset, you’ll be hard-pressed to find another Chromebook with this kind of convertible design. Lenovo had the similar N20p, for example, but it got lukewarm reviews and is no longer available on the company’s site. That leaves a couple worthy competitors, none of them with a 360-degree hinge. Some favorites include the larger Acer Chromebook 13 ($350), which offers long battery life, a 1080p screen and a more spacious keyboard. We also like the 13-inch Toshiba Chromebook 2 (now $230), which has a low-glare IPS display (also full HD), along with fast WiFi and decent audio. Those models have more robust NVIDIA and Intel processors, respectively, allowing for slightly better performance than the Flip.
That said, the Chromebook Flip comes out to be nearly as good a choice, thanks to its versatile and extra-lightweight design, long battery life and surprisingly good build quality. Even if you rarely use the touchscreen, those attributes make it worth a close look. As a warning, its smaller-than-average keyboard might be a turnoff to some, but it’s still usable, especially if you treat this as a secondary computer, perhaps a travel machine to use on the go. That shortcoming aside, the Flip is still a good deal even if you spring for the pricier $279 model.
AT&T announces the ASUS ZenFone 2E for prepaid GoPhone subscribers

AT&T and ASUS have just introduced a new smartphone called the ZenFone 2E for the budget-conscious crowd. This device is the newest in AT&T’s prepaid GoPhone lineup and only costs $119.99.
The ZenFone 2E a 5.0-inch IPS LCD display with 1280 x 720 resolution, a dual-core Intel Atom processor, 1GB of RAM, 8GB of on-board storage and microSD expansion up to 64GB. It’s also 4G LTE-capable, and has an 8MP rear-facing shooter, a 2MP front camera, and a 2500mAh non-removable battery. It runs ASUS’ ZenUI software overlay atop Android 5.0 Lollipop, and comes in both Black and White color options with swappable back plates.
Take a quick look at the video below to see the device in action.
The ZenFone 2E is now available in both Walmart and Target retail locations in the United States, though it won’t be available in AT&T stores until Friday, July 24th. Best Buy will also have the device on sale starting August 2nd. Considering the list of decent specifications, $119.99 for the off-contract price of the phone really isn’t too bad at all. We’ll let you know when the device becomes more available, but for now, feel free to check out the press release by following the source link below.
























