Spotify builds a war chest to compete with Apple Music

Now that Apple is launching a streaming music service, Spotify is going door-to-door to drum up backing for its forthcoming war. Of course, it doesn’t need moral support as much as cash, and investors must think it’s a safe bet, since they’ve stumped-up $526 million to the company’s fighting fund. As the Wall Street Journal reports, that means that finance-orientated types believe that Spotify is worth more than $8.5 billion — a pretty penny for a business that’s never made a profit.

Spotify doesn’t just have the looming threat of Apple on its mind, since the company recently opened-up its service to podcasts and video. Rather than simply being a place where you can get a big chunk (but not all) of the tunes you want for a monthly fee, the firm has an eye on a more radical transformation. It’s entirely plausible that the Spotify of the future is a one-stop shop for all of your video and audio needs like a mutant cross of YouTube and iTunes.

The company also wants to win the hearts and minds of its users by going on something of a positive PR campaign. The first official missive from the outfit is to reveal that it has more than 75 million users and 20 million subscribers, not to mention that it has paid out more than $3 billion in royalties for their music.

We won’t bore you with the list of which equity funds and bored rich people have kicked in the moolah, since we haven’t heard of any of them either. Oh, except for TeliaSonera, which is the biggest phone company in both Sweden and Finland. Given that Spotify was founded in Stockholm, that’s not exactly the biggest surprise — after all, you’ve gotta cheer on your hometown hero.

Filed under: Portable Audio/Video, Internet, Apple

Comments

Source: WSJ

Apple Maps Vehicles Collecting ‘Street View’ Data in US, UK and Ireland

Apple has published a support document on its website confirming that it has been using a fleet of vehicles to collect street-level imagery for Apple Maps. Apple outlines that it will blur faces and license plates on images, as Google Maps does for Street View, and lists where Apple Maps vehicles will be driving in the United States, England and Ireland between June 15 to June 30.

“Apple is driving vehicles around the world to collect data which will be used to improve Apple Maps. Some of this data will be published in future Apple Maps updates. We are committed to protecting your privacy while collecting this data. For example, we will blur faces and license plates on collected images prior to publication.”

Apple has been driving around fifth-generation Dodge Caravans equipped with LiDAR camera equipment on the roof to collect street-level imagery in the United States, starting with major cities and metropolitan areas in the south, northeast and midwest regions of the country. The mapping vehicles have been spotted in at least a dozen states to date as they continue moving further inland.

Apple Map vehicle collecting street-level imagery in New Jersey in May 2015
MacRumors has been tracking Apple Maps vehicles in the United States for the past several months, with the first sightings occurring in New York City in August 2014. Since then, using verified photos with GPS metadata, we have confirmed Apple Maps vehicle sightings in Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Francisco and many other areas. Many of those locations are listed below.

Click on the map for an interactive view of Apple Maps vehicle sightings in the U.S.

Sunnyvale, California

Apple confirms many of these locations in the support document, while adding Oahu, Boston, Detroit, St. Louis, Seattle, Tucson and surrounding counties as additional U.S. regions it will be surveying in the second half of June. Apple Maps vehicles will also head overseas to collect street-level imagery in Birmingham, Dublin, Essex, Kent, London and several other cities in England and Ireland.

Apple is sending cars to help build its own Street View

Google’s Street View cars are well known, but you may also soon see vehicles from its biggest rival: Apple. The company today confirmed that in order to improve Apple Maps, it’s embarking on a mission to drive cars all over the world, starting in the US, UK and Ireland. It’s created a dedicated website detailing the locations it intends to visit and when it expects to be there, which may allow you to “accidentally” get snapped by one of its vehicles. From June 15th, Apple will visit a number of US states and cities, including California, Florida and New York, as well as London, Birmingham and Essex in the UK.

Transparency appears to be Apple’s aim here, so it’s listing areas before the cars actually arrive. The company also says that it will “blur faces and license plates on collected images prior to publication,” which suggests that the company isn’t just mapping directions, but that it’s also building a Street View service of its very own. It comes just days after Apple announced a number of Maps improvements, which includes the roll out of transit directions in a number of US and international cities, reiterating Apple’s desire to beat Google at its own game.

Filed under: Transportation, Internet, Apple

Comments

Via: The Guardian

Source: Apple Maps Vehicles

Phil Schiller Talks 16 GB iPhones and Thinness vs Battery Life Tradeoffs

A day after the WWDC keynote address, Apple SVP of Marketing Phil Schiller joined Daring Fireball’s John Gruber on Gruber’s podcast, The Talk Show. The episode has not yet been posted, but The Verge was on hand to document the interview. Schiller addressed concerns about 16 GB iPhones, the decision between thin devices and battery life and the single USB port on the MacBook.

Gruber suggested to Schiller that the Cupertino company’s iOS devices should come with larger storage capacities on the low end, as the 16 GB of storage provided in the base iPhone 6 or 6 Plus is harder to live with with the current size of apps. Schiller countered that services like iCloud could make up the difference.

“The belief is more and more as we use iCloud services for documents and our photos and videos and music,” he said, “that perhaps the most price-conscious customers are able to live in an environment where they don’t need gobs of local storage because these services are lightening the load.”

Schiller also said that using 16 GB storage for lower-end models allows Apple to save money for use on higher-end components in other parts of the device, like the camera.

When asked about the relationship between the thickness of a phone and battery life, and whether maintaining the thickness of its devices could lead to more power-efficient internals and bigger batteries, Schiller said that Apple has the right balance with its devices. He points out that a device with a larger battery and thickness becomes heavier and takes longer to charge. Schiller notes that Apple tries to figure out the tradeoffs with every device it makes, and he thinks the company has made “great choices” in those tradeoffs.

The Apple SVP also acknowledged that the new MacBook, with its one USB-C port and new keyboard, isn’t for everyone. However, he said he believes that Apple is a company that needs to release forward-thinking products like the new MacBook, which is an effort to push the world into a place where users don’t plug things into their laptops. Schiller said he wants an Apple that’s “bold and taking risks and being aggressive.”

Apple has faced criticism for its “bold decisions” in the past, with users unsure of whether a 16 GB device is enough for a daily driver, concern about whether new devices will have improved battery life with thinner designs and products with new technology that come with heavy initial limitations.

While the episode has not yet debuted online yet, it should be available on Daring Fireball in due time.

New York and Connecticut Officials Investigate Apple Music for Possible Antitrust Violations [Mac Blog]

Government officials in New York and Connecticut are investigating the deals Apple and major record companies established for Apple Music to determine whether there were any antitrust violations, reports The New York Times. Eric T. Schneiderman and George Jepsen, attorneys general in the two states, are suspicious Apple tried to convince record labels to abandon free, ad-supported music services like those offered by Spotify and YouTube.

The attorneys general wanted to know whether Apple pressured the music labels — or whether the labels conspired with Apple and one another — to withdraw support for popular “freemium” services offered by companies like Spotify in favor of Apple’s paid music subscriptions.

Spotify offers a freemium ad-supported music tier that lets listeners access music at no cost, provided they also listen to ads. Apple Music does not include such a free tier, instead requiring all users to pay $9.99 per month for an individual plan or $14.99 per month for a family plan.

There have been rumors suggesting Apple asked record labels to discontinue allowing services like Spotify to offer music at no cost, which has led to scrutiny from the European Commission, the United States Department of Justice, and the United States Federal Trade Commission. Apple Music would, of course, be a much more appealing option should other services not be able to offer music for free, but it remains unclear whether Apple executives did indeed push labels to change their deals.

According to The New York Times, Universal Music Group is cooperating with the investigation and has told the attorneys general via letter that it has no agreements with Apple or other record labels that “impede the availability of free or ad-supported music streaming services” and it has no intention to enter any such agreements.

In a statement, Connecticut attorney general George Jepsen said he was satisfied with the response he received from UMG. “We will continue to monitor that market to ensure that consumers and competition are protected,” he said. Schneiderman’s office made a similar statement, saying “It’s important to ensure that the market continues to develop free from collusion and other anticompetitive practices.”

Jepsen and Schneiderman have been involved in Apple’s affairs several times in the past. Jepsen led a lawsuit against Apple during the e-book price fixing scandal and has questioned Apple about Apple Watch privacy concerns. Schneiderman has been involved with smartphone anti-theft measures and was one of the main proponents of a “kill switch” for smartphones.

Apple Music debuted yesterday at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference. It will launch to the public on June 30 alongside iOS 8.4.

Eddy Cue and Jimmy Iovine Talk Apple Music in Series of Interviews

Following yesterday’s debut of Apple Music, Jimmy Iovine and iTunes Chief Eddy Cue sat down with Billboard to discuss the new service and app, which combine on-demand streaming music with 24/7 radio and a social networking platform where artists can interact with fans.

According to Cue, the $9.99 individual price point for Apple Music wasn’t a sticking point for the company as some earlier reports suggested, but the company was invested in negotiating a reasonable family subscription price. Apple Music lets up to 6 family members share an account for $14.99, a price point that Cue says will get entire families on board with the service.

I think the cost of an album for a month of subscription is fair. Could you argue, $7.99 or $8.99? Who cares. I think where subscription is missing the boat is on the family — you have a spouse, boyfriend, girlfriend kids … the concept of signing up for these individual subscription plans multiple times is just not going to happen so we spent a lot of time with the labels to convince them that the real opportunity here is to get the whole family. With that, all boats rise.

On the subject of streaming music cannibalizing iTunes downloads, Cue says he expects some of the customer base to subscribe instead of buying music, but he believes downloads will “go on for a long, long time.” “There are lots of people who are very happy downloading,” he said. “And I think they’ll continue to.”

Explaining the reasoning behind a 24-hour human-curated radio station, Iovine explained that over the past 15 years, radio’s become manufactured, something he’d like to change. “It’s either genre-based or beat-driven or research-driven,” he said. “So I said, let’s build something that’s got none of that that just plays music because it’s great.”

Cue and Iovine also did interviews with The Wall Street Journal and The Guardian, sharing much of the same information, but in the latter interview, the duo also spoke on Apple Connect, the social networking component of Apple Music. The point of Apple Connect and Apple Music in general, said Cue, was to give artists and labels control over content sharing.

“Our viewpoint was very simple: let the artist and label control it. They can put it up on Connect for free if they want to, or they can put it up behind the [subscription] paywall, or they can make it available on the iTunes Store for sale. They’re in control of their music and how they want to distribute it,” says Cue.

Iovine added commentary suggesting a music service needs to be “a win for everybody.” “We wanted to give artists a place where there’s a rhyme and a reason,” he said. “Where there’s a payoff! And not just a financial payoff, but an emotional payoff. A creative payoff.”

Apple Music, with its on-demand streaming service, Beats 1 radio station, and Apple Connect platform, will officially launch on June 30, as part of the iOS 8.4 update. As previously mentioned, it will be priced at $9.99 for individuals and $14.99 for families. Existing Beats subscribers will be able to transition their subscriptions to Apple Music.