How LaLiga is making Barcelona and Real Madrid games high-tech

LaLiga, Spain’s professional football (soccer) league, is home to two of the biggest clubs in the world: Barcelona and Real Madrid. And those teams are each anchored by Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo, respectively, who are the two biggest players in the sport. While that alone is a reason to keep up with LaLiga every season, the league isn’t resting on its laurels and is working hard to make the game experience for fans more interactive — particularly those watching at home. Through a partnership with Intel, LaLiga is now letting TV viewers have access to 360-degree replays, thanks to the same True View tech that was recently implemented in the NBA and NFL.

To bring that to life, LaLiga and Intel have to place 38 cameras around a stadium, which then transform a series of stitched, 2D videos into one video that gives you a multi-angle view of highlight plays, like a goal or a penalty kick (which is enhanced by a pulley SkyCam hanging from above). Right now, the True View setup is only in place in Barcelona’s Camp Nou and Real Madrid’s Santiago Bernabeu stadiums, but soon it’ll be ready in Atletico Madrid’s and Sevilla’s, as well.

LaLiga is also using True View to create what it calls the “Laser Wall,” an overlay graphic that displays a virtual straight line that gives viewers a clear picture during offside calls — the 38 cameras make it more accurate to help avoid any controversies. “Be The Player,” for its part, offers a birds-eye view of a player controlling the ball in live broadcasts. This is perfect for hardcore fans because it lets them see plays from the perspective of Messi, Ronaldo or other LaLiga players. Down the road, LaLiga said it could make specific plays available to watch on demand after a match so people can tinker with them. That would be better having the Be the Player videos shown just as replays, controlled by the TV production team.

Naturally, LaLiga is investing in 4K and HDR. At the moment, the league says it is producing two games every week of the season in UHD resolution and with high-dynamic range support, but it varies by country where people are actually able to watch them. In the US, for instance, BeIN Sports, the official provider of LaLiga there, doesn’t offer a 4K or HDR channel, so people in the states are out of luck for now. That said, LaLiga says it hopes this changes soon, since that’s the only thing holding it back from offering this to fans all over the US.

As it did with True View, LaLiga is following in the NBA’s footsteps by experimenting with virtual reality. The league showed me a couple of VR experiences at MWC 2018, powered by Samsung’s VR, that focus on 360-degree video replays and a digital room where you can watch games and see stats in real-time. The experiences themselves are fun, since you get a more immersive view compared to watching on TV, but it’s no secret that sports can look pretty terrible in VR. That’s not LaLiga’s problem though, as it’s only working with the tech that’s available to them. Call me old fashioned, but I’d rather watch a Barcelona vs Real Madrid game on TV.

What LaLiga didn’t talk about at its showcase in Barcelona was Video Assistant Referee (VAR), which was surprising considering it is FIFA’s, the sport’s governing body, first major adoption of technology. That said, a LaLiga spokesperson told Engadget that it’s still planning to start the 2018-2019 season with VAR, though the final decision will be up to the Spanish Football Federation (RFEF) and its referees. Assuming nothing major happens, though, LaLiga will soon be the latest European league to have VAR in place, along with others around the world such as the US’ Major League Soccer.

Once that’s in place, and combined with things like True View and 4K HDR, LaLiga is setting itself up to be one of the most high-tech professional — not just in football, but sports in general.

Catch up on the latest news from MWC 2018 right here.

German court rules Google isn’t required to vet websites

Do search engines have an obligation to make sure every website obeys the law before listing it? They certainly don’t in Germany. The country’s Federal Court of Justice has ruled that Google isn’t required to vet sites for defamatory material before they appear in its results. Two people had demanded that Google create filters to avoid showing sites where the complainants had been verbally attacked, but the court determined that search firms like Google only had to take action when notified that a site has clearly violated someone’s rights.

Asking a search provider to vet each and every site would make it “impossible” to get much use out of the internet, according to the court. There’s an “unmanageable flood of data” online, and requiring companies like Google to ensure that every site is legal would “seriously call into question” the very nature of a search site’s business model despite its legality.

European Union countries have a “right to be forgotten” that lets residents scrub search results with outdated or irrelevant info, such as a criminal case where the charges were dropped. However, the German ruling makes it clear that this right doesn’t extend to people hurling verbal abuse, and certainly doesn’t cover preemptive screening — Google doesn’t have to ensure that you only see kind words. And while Google can set up general filters for clearly illegal content, the sheer volume of content added to the internet every day would make it utterly impractical to guarantee that every search result honors the law.

Source: Reuters

Fitbit’s Adidas-branded smartwatch will cost you $330

Last year, Fitbit announced it had entered a multiyear deal with Adidas — a partnership that would result in a new edition of the Fitbit Ionic and exclusive personal training programs to go along with it. Today, the company announces that the product of that collaboration is now available for presale. The Fitbit Ionic: Adidas edition is a running-focused smartwatch that comes with a breathable sport band, an Adidas-designed clock face inspired by race bibs and the Adidas Train app, which includes six workouts aimed at improving your running performance.

The workouts are short, on-screen routines, between five and 15 minutes long and include exercises aimed at improving strength, stability and speed, boosting your metabolism and guiding you through proper pre- and post-workout stretches. You can also expect to find all of the features included in the original Ionic, our review of which you can check out here.

Yesterday, the company said during an earnings call that it would be working on a “family” of smartwatches this year and that they would be produced with mass appeal in mind. Fitbit lost $277.2 million last year and saw a 32 percent drop in the number of devices it sold compared to 2016.

The Fitbit Ionic: Adidas edition comes with an Ink Blue and Ice Gray band and is priced at $330. You can preorder it starting today through Fitbit.com and a handful of online retailers. It will become available in stores — including Amazon, Best Buy, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Kohl’s, Macy’s and Nordstrom — on March 19th.

Source: Fitbit

Apple’s Stock Price Reaches All-Time High Above $180 After Warren Buffett Praises iPhone Maker

Apple’s stock price has established a new all-time high in the company’s history, as shares exchanged hands for slightly above the previous record of $180.10 in intraday trading today following several weeks of gains.

AAPL has been on the rise since bottoming out at $150.24 on February 9, one day after the Dow Jones plunged over 1,000 points. The broader selloff in the stock market proved to be short lived, as many technology stocks have since rebounded, and the Dow Jones is up nearly eight percent compared to a few weeks ago.

The all-time high comes after billionaire investor Warren Buffett said his company Berkshire Hathaway has purchased more shares of Apple than any other stock over the past year. Berkshire Hathaway increased its Apple holdings by 23.3 percent, to 165.3 million shares, according to recent filings with the SEC.

Apple shares have technically traded for higher prices, but today’s all-time high accounts for multiple stock splits that have occurred over the years. Apple now has a market capitalization of well over $900 billion.

Tag: AAPL
Discuss this article in our forums

Apple Reportedly Hires Former Twitter Engineer Michael Abbott, Who is ‘Captivated’ by AR and AI

Apple has reportedly hired engineer Michael Abbott for an unspecified role within the company, according to information obtained by MacGeneration [Google Translate]. Abbott’s job history includes vice president of engineering for Twitter, team lead for the Azure cloud platform at Microsoft, and senior vice president of apps and services at Palm, where he helped create webOS.

More recently, Abbott served as a venture capitalist at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, and invested in numerous start-ups and companies over the years, including Snapchat. In a personal update blog post shared last August, he explained that he would be stepping away from VC investing “over the next couple of months,” and instead focus on his engineering passions again.

Michael Abbot via Recode

Ultimately, my desire to discover and invest in the next new thing became eclipsed by my desire to get my hands dirty again and build the next new thing. I have come to understand that my real passion lies in the grappling to understand, develop and build new technologies. Like you, perhaps, I am captivated by what AR could enable, and fascinated by ‘real’ applications of AI/ML, or how security techniques from the world of geopolitics are influencing enterprise technologies.

I was born and raised here in Silicon Valley. I grew up seeing and being inspired by the big names we take for granted today. Now with some graying hairs (but still a full head of hair for now!), a daughter in elementary school, and enough time since I last built a new technology and company, I am ready to do it again. I have more to build.

Since his move to Apple hasn’t been confirmed, speculation suggests Abbott could be working on Siri development under Craig Federighi. His blog post also directly references being “captivated” by augmented reality and “real” applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning — all areas that Apple and CEO Tim Cook have repeatedly referenced as being of great interest for the company.

The last few well publicized hires made by Apple have been mainly focused on the company’s burgeoning streaming TV service, with Apple obtaining talent from Amazon, Hulu, and Legendary.
Discuss this article in our forums

Energy storage breakthrough could boost EV range and slash charge time

Electric cars could soon have as much range as petrol and diesel cars — and recharge in a matter of minutes — thanks to what researchers are calling a “breakthrough” in energy storage technology. Teams from Bristol University and Surrey University have created a new material for supercapacitors, which store electric charge, that could see EVs recharge in as little as 10 minutes compared to the eight hours it can take for EVs with lithium-ion batteries. And according to the researchers, it boasts enough energy density to see EVs surpass even the top range of current leading models, such as Teslas. Elon Musk himself has previously said a breakthrough in EV technology would likely come from supercapacitors, rather than batteries.

The technology was originally being developed for mobile devices — researchers wanted to create a transparent polymer for Google Glass-like applications — but once the team discovered the energy storage potential of the material it refocused its efforts. Now it believes the polymer could be more energy-dense than lithium ion, holding 180 watt-hours per kilogram, while lithium ion holds around 100-120 watt-hours per kilogram.

However, the technology has some drawbacks. Its capacity to charge quickly means it loses charge relatively rapidly, too. Leaving a supercapacitor car on your driveway for a month would see it lose most of its charge, for example. So it’s likely the first cars offering this tech would come with a small conventional battery, too. Nonetheless, while it may still be early days, this technology has the potential to eradicate some of the biggest barriers to EV take-up. According to Dr. Donald Highgate, research director for company Superdielectrics, which worked with the universities on the project, “It could have a seismic effect on energy, but it’s not a done deal.”

Via: Guardian

Source: Surrey University

Apple will open its own medical clinics for employees

Apple is launching its own medical clinics called “AC Wellness,” in a move that will allow it to take employee healthcare into its own hands. Following similar news about Amazon’s venture with Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway, Apple plans to offer what it calls the “world’s best health care experience” to workers. It quietly published a website for the venture with a careers page seeking a primary care doctors, nurses, an exercise coach, “care navigator,” and on-site lab test personnel.

The company will build two clinics in Santa Clara, describing them as “multiple, stunning state-of-the-art medical centers” in the job listings. One will be built inside its “spaceship” Apple Park headquarters, while the other will be located just north it. Several employees who previously worked at Stanford Health Care have already started working for AC Wellness, according to CNBC.

Apple said it will provide a “unique concierge-like healthcare experience … enabled by technology.” It has already gone heavily into the industry via its Apple Watch health tracking, and creating its HealthKit and ResearchKit platform to aid researchers and doctors in tracking employee and patient health.

On top of providing doctors, nurses and other medical staff, it looks like Apple will focus equally on prevention, via diet and exercise programs for employees. As such, it’s looking for “designers” who will put together programs aimed at promoting healthy living.

Apple has over 120,000 employees, and US tech firms spend more per employee on healthcare than most other industries. At the same time, US medical spending tops every other nation in the world by a long shot. Apple should thus be able to save a lot of money and increase the quality of care by bringing its medical services in-house. There are very few companies with the means to launch their own private medical systems, so it’s not surprising that among the first to do it are Amazon and Apple.

Via: The Guardian

Source: AC Wellness

Panasonic’s GH5s is perfect for video shooters and no one else

Panasonic was the first company to embrace mirrorless camera video with the GH1, helping to change the way low-budget movies could be made. Finally, videographers had a (reasonably) large sensor camera that could handle autofocus, external microphones, and 1080p video. The company raised the bar with each subsequent model, introducing 4K video with the GH4, and internal 10-bit 4K with the GH5.

With the launch of the GH5s, however, Panasonic made a gutsy move by launching a mirrorless camera that prioritizes video in a way that none of its rivals have. As a fan of large-sensor video, I was curious to test it out, especially for low-light shooting. My conclusion? It produces the best video of any mirrorless camera on the market. But many folks considering it — like documentary makers, event videographers and vloggers — will likely prefer the GH5, which has built-in stabilization and costs $400 less.

The heart of the difference between the GH5 and GH5s is the sensor. Panasonic reverted to the old days of the GH1 and GH2 by using a multi-aspect sensor with an optical low-pass filter (OLPF). It has a true 10.2-megapixel resolution, the perfect size to capture DCI Cinema 4K (4,096 × 2,160) without pixel binning or line skipping. While that ensures crisp, sharp video, it means that it actually has a lower resolution than an iPhone for photos.

The GH5s is also missing the GH5’s in-body stabilization (IBS), a big negative for photographers. That might be because, many video shooters don’t rely on that for hand-held shots. It simply doesn’t smooth things out enough and can cause unwanted lag and glitches in pans, dollies and other camera moves. It can do that even if you turn it off, because in cameras with built in IBS, the sensor is never rigidly fixed.

Reducing resolution and eliminating stabilization has further benefits. With larger pixels, the sensor can gather more light, making the GH5s a better night shooter than the GH5. That’s further aided by the “dual native ISO” design that allows for less noisy video at higher ISO settings.

And with no bulky stabilization electronics around the sensor, it has a slightly wider field of view than its photo-centric sibling, with a 1.8x crop factor instead of 2.0x for DCI 4K. That’s a huge plus, considering that micro four-thirds is the bottom rung in sensor sizes compared to full-frame and APS-C — the more you can get out of it, the better. Also, with a multi-aspect sensor, the field of view is the same regardless of which aspect ratio you choose, including for 17:9 Cinema 4K (DCI).

For video, the GH5s can’t be touched. You can shoot 4,096 x 2,160 at up to 60 fps, with 10-bit (a billion) colors and professional 4:2:2 color subsampling. Choose between long-GOP, MPEG-type codecs at up to 150 Mbps, or for easier editing, ALL-I, frame-by-frame video at a stellar 400 Mbps.

All of that jargon means that you can grab very high-quality, HDR video and change it substantially afterwards. Aiding that further is the “VLog-L” color profile that will give editors the maximum dynamic range to tweak colors. (That was available on the GH5 too, but cost around $100 extra.) If slo-mo is more your thing, the GH5s can capture DCI 4K at reduced 8-bit, 4:2:0 quality levels at up to 60fps, or 1080p at a time-stopping 240 fps.

No other mirrorless or DSLR cameras, including models like Sony’s A7R III and the Nikon D850, offer 4K with 10-bit internal recording. That’s a shame, because Sony’s large-sensor cameras offer a much different look for video than the GH5s, but the lower recording quality limits their usefulness for video. If you want to relate it to stills, it’s like offering only JPEGs instead of RAW.

There are a few other changes from the GH5. The GH5s supports 14-bit RAW photos, better than the 12-bit GH5, so there is that nod to photographers. The GH5s retains the GH5’s 3.5mm microphone input, but supports phantom power and line levels so that you can use professional microphones. The EVF runs at a faster 120fps, and picky cinema folks can even output images with look-up table (LUT) presets. Oh, and there’s that “rec” button colored bright red so you don’t mix it up with the shutter release, and to differentiate it visually from the GH5.

Engadget/Steve Dent

Now that you know about the GH5s specs, what’s it like? Let’s get one thing out of the way: The GH5s is a great video camera and a joy to use. I shot with both it and the Sony A7S II together at a couple of events in Paris to get a feel for the handling and image quality.

Panasonic’s menu system is much better than Sony’s. All video settings are stored in one place, so it’s easier to find things like the audio level adjustments. The GH5s also offers video scopes, a “shutter angle” option, waveforms, zebras, focus peaking and other videography aids. There’s even a “focus transition” that lets you select up to three focus zones and switch between them while you shoot. It’s a poor man’s focus puller that works very well, as long as you don’t bump the camera when using it. (Panasonic needs to add this to the remote function for manual operation, to prevent vibrations.)

If you’re familiar with the GH5, there’s not a lot of difference in handling, as the GH5s has an identical body, controls and menu structure. The biggest change that might affect how you work is the lack of IBS. That forces you to rely on a tripod, dolly or external stabilizer like DJI’s Ronin, unless your hands are steadier than mine.

Ironically, the small form factor, flippable screen and video features should make the GH5s perfect for run-and-gun shooting and vlogging. But without stabilization, those things are made more difficult. Panasonic probably had to ditch it to include the multi-active sensor, but if you really need IBS, it’s still supported on most of Panasonic’s Vario lenses, among others.

The GH5s’ two main rivals are the Sony A7S II and its sibling, the GH5. As others have noted, it crushes the GH5 in low-light, with substantially reduced grain at higher ISO settings. That’s down to the larger pixels and dual ISO on the 4K-optimized sensor.

Panasonic GH5s 4K 10-bit video frame grab

Engadget/Steve Dent

The GH5s produces very clean video at ISOs as high as 6400. It also looks good beyond that, up to 25,600 (max ISO is 208,000) but the noise reduction is more aggressive. Beyond 25,600, video starts to get unusable.

Against the Sony A7S II, it’s more complicated than just noise and ISO. Panasonic itself clearly sees that model as its main competition, as the company showed journalists a number of A7S II comparison videos during the launch.

Here’s the thing: The A7S II does have less noise in low light, but even then, I’d rather use the GH5s (to a point). For instance, I shot a concept car in 4K with moderate lighting, using ISOs in the 1600-3200 range. There was no real difference in noise, but the output from the GH5s looked richer, with better colors and more detailed blacks. That’s likely down to the higher quality, 10-bit, 150 Mbps 4:2:2 codec, compared to the A7S II, which records internally at 8-bit, 100 Mbps, 4:2:0.

Cranking it beyond 6400, Sony’s A7S II has increasingly lower noise than the GH5s. But again, the GH5s appears to have better color and blacks. So you have to decide which of those things you want, and for me, a little more noise isn’t a huge deal, but muted colors and muddy blacks are.

At the upper ISO ranges, the GH5s can’t hold a candle, as it were, to the A7S II. The latter camera is arguably usable up to 204,800, at which point the GH5s video falls apart completely. However, it’s mostly an academic exercise at that point, as folks rarely, if ever, need to shoot in pitch black.

Sony’s camera can pull that off because its much larger sensor has pixels with an 8.4 micron pitch, while the GH5s pixels are 4.5 microns — nearly half. That brings up another key advantage of the A7S II: The full-frame sensor is a big draw for videographers looking for more bokeh and narrower depths of field. It’s not just an arty trick with video, but an important tool for, say, shifting focus from one subject to another.

At the same time, sometimes you need a deep depth of field for video, and a smaller sensor actually helps there. On the A7S II, you might need an aperture setting of f/4.0 to keep items in a scene in focus, compared to f/2.8 on the Panasonic. In that case, the Sony loses some of its low-light advantage.

A few other things: Sony’s A7S II has a bad reputation for rolling shutter, aka jello effect, especially at 4K. Panasonic claims the GH5s reduces rolling shutter by 25 percent compared to the GH5, which was already better than the A7S II. And again, if you need to shoot slow motion or high frame rates, the Panasonic is the only game in town for 4K at 60fps and can manage the feat in DCI 4K, which Sony doesn’t even support.

In sum, Panasonic has really done a great job targeting the video crowd with the GH5s. By switching back to a multi-active sensor, it squeezed the most out of the micro four thirds format, which should give pause to folks considering an APS-C model like the Sony A6500 or Fujitsu’s new X-H1. It also blows away nearly every camera, save Sony’s A7S II, in low-light performance. And even where it falls down there, the GH5s’ excellent video codec and high bit rates can save the day.

But will it convince Sony or even Canon 5D mark IV video shooters to switch? I’m not so sure about that. People who like large sensors would very reluctantly go down to one half the size in exchange for a more robust codec, in my opinion. And the GH5s is still limited to contrast detect focus. It seems to work a bit better for video than the GH5, but Canon’s dual-pixel, phase-detect autofocus is the gold standard — it’s much faster and more reliable.

It’ll also be tough to get GH5 shooters on board. Many of those folks are not pleased about the lack of IBS on the GH5s, especially the vlogging crowd. At the same time, the GH5 is a great camera for general photography, but a 10.2-megapixel mirrorless that costs $400 more is a pretty tough sell, even with the GH5s’ new 14-bit RAW mode.

As someone who does a fair amount of video work, I applaud Panasonic for building the GH5s and would recommend it for pro or keen amateur video shooters over Sony’s A7S II. At the same time, if you don’t depend on video for your livelihood, I wouldn’t advise spending $2,400 on it (nor would i recommend the A7S II). If you do both video and photography equally, then your best option is probably, yes, the older GH5 or, if you have more cash and want a full-frame sensor, the A7R III or Canon 5D Mark IV.

Sky Q is getting better personalisation features and Spotify

All of a sudden, Sky has become the prize in a bidding war between US media giants Fox and Comcast, but for now, it’s business as usual on the ground. The pay-TV provider has today announced a number of new features coming to its Sky Q service, primarily focused on making the user experience more personalised. Machine learning will begin to play a more important role throughout — surfacing different TV shows depending on the time of day, for example. The sports tab is also becoming better tailored, assessing your viewing habits and liaising with the Sky Sports app so it knows your favourite events and teams.

These updates will feed into a “brand new widescreen user interface” that blends personal recommendations with a selection of on-demand TV curated by Sky. New ‘most recent recordings’ and ‘favourite channels’ sections on the homepage are intended to connect people with what they want to watch quicker. Additional voice commands that reflect the personalisation push are also coming to the service — “show movies for me,” for instance. Moreover, voice control will be extended to certain apps, meaning you’ll be able to ask your Sky Q box what the weather’s doing that day.

To complement the Sky Kids mobile app, set-top boxes are getting a new “kids mode.” It sounds like a walled garden for the little ones to bounce around in, letting you plop them in front of the TV and know they aren’t going to stumble upon a rerun of Dexter or something. Other, top-level updates include HDR support on Sky Q — the amount of 4K content on the service will also double this year, apparently — and letting users stream TV to more devices than before (two is the current maximum) via the Sky Q app. Related to that, Sky is releasing Q apps for smart TVs and other “third-party devices” (we imagine this means Apple TVs, Rokus, Fire TVs etc.). Not only will this make multiroom simpler, since Sky Q Mini boxes won’t be a necessity, but it’s also Sky following through on its plans to offer Q without a satellite dish.

Lastly, Sky Q will be getting its very own Spotify app this spring — much to the chagrin of MTV and the seven music channels it somehow manages to keep on air. It’ll end up being the first high-profile app to come to the platform since it launched two years ago. The aforementioned updates won’t be hitting set-top boxes all at once, but Sky’s effectively laid out a roadmap of new features it’ll begin drip-feeding into the system from next month onwards.

Source: Sky

Google releases info on 2.4 million ‘right to be forgotten’ requests

Google has received 2.4 million “right to be forgotten” requests since 2014, most of which came from private individuals, according to its latest transparency report. Europe’s biggest court passed the right to be forgotten law in 2014, compelling the tech titan to remove personal info from its search engine upon request. In the report, Google has revealed that it complied with 43.3 percent of all the requests it’s gotten and has also detailed the nature of those takedown pleas.

France, Germany and the UK apparently generated 51 percent of all the URL delisting appeals. Overall, 89 percent of the takedown pleas came from private individuals: Non-government figures such as celebrities submitted 41,213 of the URLs in Google’s pile, while politicians and government officials submitted 33,937. As Gizmodo noted, though, there’s a small group of law firms and reputation management services submitting numerous pleas, suggesting the rise of reputation-fixing business in the region.

Out of those 2.4 million requests, 19.1 percent are directory URLs, while news websites and social networks only make up 17.6 and 11.6 percent of them. Majority of the URLs submitted for removal are random online destinations that don’t fall under any of the previous categories. As for the takedown’s reasons, it looks 18.1 percent of the submissions want their professional info scrubbed, 7.7 percent want info they previously posted online themselves to be removed and 6.1 percent want their crimes hidden from search.

If you’re wondering why Google only complied with less than half of the takedown pleas it received and want to know how to submit a successful request, take this info into account:

“A few common material factors involved in decisions not to delist pages include the existence of alternative solutions, technical reasons, or duplicate URLs. We may also determine that the page contains information which is strongly in the public interest. Determining whether content is in the public interest is complex and may mean considering many diverse factors, including—but not limited to—whether the content relates to the requester’s professional life, a past crime, political office, position in public life, or whether the content is self-authored content, consists of government documents, or is journalistic in nature.”

We’ll find out more about what the law thinks Google should and shouldn’t remove once the tech titan faces a couple of lawsuits filed against it in London. Two individuals want the company to remove URLs that have something to do with their previous convictions from search, and the first trial is scheduled to be heard today, February 27th.

Via: Gizmodo

Source: Google