Skip to content

August 8, 2017

Early benchmarks pit AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X against Intel Core i9-7900K

by John_A

Why it matters to you

Here’s an early look at how AMD’s 12-core Ryzen Threadripper 1950X processor stacks up against an equivalently priced Intel chip.

LinusTechTips scored a pre-NDA (non-disclosure agreement) deal with Dell to review the new Alienware Area-51 desktop before the review embargo lifts for AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper desktop processors. As previously reported, Dell’s new monster hexagonal desktops span two base models: one with Intel’s latest Core i9 X-Series processor, and one with AMD’s new Ryzen Threadripper 1950X chip. The Intel-based desktop may not arrive until the end of August while AMD’s two Ryzen Threadripper chips launch on August 10.

In its review, LinusTechTips pitted the 12-core Ryzen Threadripper 1950X against a stock ten-core Intel Core i9-7900X processor because they’re similar in price. That said, the benchmarks won’t be a fair 12-core to 12-core chip comparison, and LinuxTechTips also threw in stock mainstream desktop processors into the benchmarking mix as well, including the four-core Intel Core i7-7700K, and the eight-core AMD Ryzen 7 1800X.

First, we have the chips’ performance with Rise of the Tomb Raider (higher is better):

DirectX 11
DirectX 12
Intel Core i9-7900K (X299)
68FPS
67FPS
Intel Core i7-7700K (Z270)
68FPS
65FPS
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (X399)
68FPS
63FPS
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X (X370)
67FPS
62FPS

Overall, the scores here range from 62 to 68 frames per second, and only vary when DirectX 12 is in play. The site doesn’t state the resolution and graphics level they were using during the benchmark testing, as the benchmark itself doesn’t provide any adjustable settings, but instead relies on whatever you set in the game’s main Options menu. This benchmark spans three test scenarios – Geothermal Valley, Syria, and Mountain Peak – and provides an overall average generated from the three.

For the record, we benchmarked the GTX 1080 GPU and Intel’s Core i7-6820HK CPU in an Alienware 17 R4 laptop, and got an average of 59.29 fps at a 2,560 x 1,440 resolution, high/very high settings, and using DirectX 12. The results in the chart above rely on Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1080 Ti graphics card, so we suspect the results are based on a 3,840 x 2,160 resolution, and the same maximum graphics settings.

Now here are the 3DMark numbers (higher is better):

Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Time Spy (CPU)
Intel Core i9-7900K (X299)
6,896
9,586
11,081
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (X399)
6,857
9,297
8,822
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X (X370)
6,709
8,876
7,725
Intel Core i7-7700K (Z270)
6,728
8,494
5,759

Next is Cinebench Release 15 using the multi-threaded workload benchmark (higher is better):

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (X399)
2,876
Intel Core i9-7900K (X299)
2,146
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X (X370)
1,616
Intel Core i7-7700K (Z270)
975

Finally, the review used Blender 2.78c to test Ryzen Threadripper’s time to render 3D objects and environments (lower is better):

BMW
Classroom
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (X399)
2:50.59
9:21.54
Intel Core i9-7900K (X299)
3:28.16
11:29.47
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X (X370)
4:59.27
16:32.30
Intel Core i7-7700K (Z270)
7:19.58
25:07.67

Ultimately, PC gamers wanting to dump loads of cash into a new desktop can purchase the Alienware Area-51 Threadripper Edition model right now. Here are the starting points:

$3,000
$3,200
$3,550
$4,400
Processor
AMD 1950X
AMD 1950X
AMD 1950X
AMD 1950X
Graphics
GTX 1060
GTX 1060
GTX 1070
GTX 1080 Ti
Memory
8GB DDR4
@ 2,667MHz
16GB DDR4
@ 2,667MHz
16GB DDR4
@ 2,667MHz
32GB DDR4
@ 2,667MHz
Storage
2TB HDD
128GB M.2 SATA SSD
2TB HDD
512GB M.2 PCIe SSD
2TB HDD
1TB M.2 PCIe SSD
2TB HDD




Advertisements
Read more from News

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

%d bloggers like this: