Prescription lenses for Snapchat Spectacles start at $99
Snapchat’s video-recording Spectacles are super cool, but for folks who need prescription glasses they’re just another tech accessory that they can’t wear comfortably. Until now. The fine people who made prescription lenses for Google Glass at Rochester Optical will do the same for the ghostly wearable. Pricing starts at $99 for normal lenses, but pricing goes up for fancy options. High-index lenses are physically stronger and help slim down any Coke-bottle prescriptions, but they’ll run you $149. Polarized and photochromic options cost $200. That’s in addition to the $130 for Spectacles themselves, mind you.
As Mashable reports, you’ll have to place an order for the glasses and have them shipped directly to Rochester’s facilities. From there the company makes custom-fit lenses based on your prescription. And that’s where the devil resides: a note to opticians says that prescription total power can’t exceed -5 diopters. So if you’re blind as a bat like me, even this service might not be any help.
Via: Mashable
Source: Rochester Optical (1), (2)
Interpol is using AI to hunt down child predators online
The FBI may have scored a big win with operation Playpen, which helped dismantle a ring of TOR-based pedophiles and prosecute its members (thanks, Rule 41), but that was just one battle in the ongoing war against the sexual exploitation of children. That fight is now a bit easier for European law enforcement, which as debuted a new machine learning AI system that hunts for child porn on P2P networks.
The system, known as iCOP (Identifying and Catching Originators in P2P Networks), works similarly to Microsoft’s Photo DNA, wherein images of child porn are tagged with a digital signature after being collected in the course of an investigation. These signatures are then shared as a global database for law enforcement. If the same images or videos resurface during other investigations, they’re automatically flagged. This saves law enforcement the stomach-turning drudgery of manually checking the images against the database. This saves time, manpower and accelerates investigations. What’s more, it automatically identifies new material (anything that doesn’t get flagged), which provides fresh leads on more recent crimes.
And given that, according to the UN, 16 percent of people who possess this sort of material have themselves abused children, reducing the amount of time between discovery and arrest can help save children from further exploitation. The iCOP system is designed for use on Gnutella and has been trained with tens of thousands of images ranging from adult porn and benign images of kids to the full-on sexual abuse of minors.
Interpol has already begun testing iCOP for its own use in the Lyon region of France. Once installed on the Interpol system and linked to other databases like Project Vic, iCOP returned false positives in less than 8 percent of images and in just over 4 percent of videos.
“It significantly reduces the overhead for investigators,” Awais Rashid, a professor at Lancaster University (which helped develop the system) told WIRED. “Instead of having to trawl through large numbers of images and videos to identify new child abuse material, investigators are provided with automated matches which are highly accurate. In practice, this means investigators having to look at a small number of images and videos rather than thousands.” Given its initial success with Interpol, the iCOP team hopes to expand the system out to TOR-obscured networks.
Source: Wired
Twitter acquihires a new VP of product focused on connections
The latest update in Twitter’s executive shuffle is the arrival of a new VP of Product, Keith Coleman. The ex-Googler arrives by way of acquisition, as Twitter is absorbing his company, Yes, Inc. and shutting down its apps wyd and Frenzy. No, we’ve never used those either, but they have the usual modern look with lots of stickers and emoji. The apps were about connecting with friends either locally (Frenzy) or remotely (wyd – What You Doing).
Lately, Facebook has been lifting features from Snapchat and it wouldn’t surprise me if Twitter started doing the same thing to attract more users. wyd , especially, has a familiar look, but so far there’s little indication of what is in the works. In a blog post, the Yes team says it’s “excited to bring our efforts to connecting the world at a huge scale.” Finally, following an all-too-familiar trend, Coleman doesn’t appear to be a prolific Twitter user, with only 143 tweets. Hopefully, that doesn’t get in the way of further developing the company’s services, but it also probably won’t bring Vine back.
Thanks to the Yes Team and all our users who made the last 2 years an awesome adventure 🙂 https://t.co/GqwJLV3b2X
— Keith Coleman (@kcoleman) December 1, 2016
Yes! Keith and team are joining Twitter to help lead and strengthen our service! https://t.co/5aFouFxTsh
— 🚶🏽jack (@jack) December 1, 2016
Source: Yes, Inc.
2016 Toyota Camry Hybrid review – Roadshow
The Good The 2016 Toyota Camry Hybrid’s gasoline-electric drivetrain operates quietly and delivers 200 horsepower, while the car’s Entune App integrates online destination search and popular third-party apps with the dashboard.
The Bad While 40-plus mpg is very good for a midsize sedan, the Camry Hybrid falls behind direct competition from Chevrolet and Ford. Toyota does not offer Android Auto or Apple CarPlay integration.
The Bottom Line The 2016 Toyota Camry Hybrid makes a solid midsize sedan choice for its fuel economy and power, but it will need a generational update to catch up to the competition, which is beating it in fuel economy and cabin tech.
When driving a car like the Jaguar F-Type, I want to be involved in the experience, hearing the exhaust note at every launch and feeling how it grips the road in hard cornering. But sometimes, I’ve got other things on my mind while traveling, like what’s for dinner or an upcoming vacation, with as little intrusion from the driving experience as possible.
For completely carefree driving, the 2016 Toyota Camry Hybrid cocoons me, making my mode of transportation the last thing I need to think about.
The Camry Hybrid operates silently, with naturally quiet electric propulsion and a gasoline engine that only sounds off under full throttle. The gearless transmission makes acceleration smooth and linear, while the cockpit presents an uncluttered, ergonomic design with intuitive placement of controls. Considering its 40 mpg average fuel economy and 17-gallon tank, stops for gasoline come few and far between.
Amidst all the intentioned blandness, I was amused that the shifter, really just another electronic control, looked worthy of a manual-transmission sport coupe.
As this generation of Camry was introduced in 2011, it is getting long in the tooth, its technology falling behind more recent competition.
Antuan Goodwin/Roadshow
Camry is, of course, Toyota’s midsize sedan, and as the most popular passenger car in the US for many years running, most people have been in one at some point in their lives. For the Camry Hybrid, Toyota takes the same gasoline-hybrid drivetrain technology it developed for the Prius, gives it a bigger engine, and puts it into play.
That means a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, similar to that found in the base level Camry, putting its 156 horsepower and 156 pound-feet of torque to work. In concert with the engine, a 105-kilowatt motor and nickel-metal hydride battery pack bring total output up to 200 horsepower, ample for a midsize like the Camry Hybrid.
Hybrid Toyota Camry a 200-horsepower…
See full gallery
1 – 6 of 23
Next
Prev
Even with that power and its sporty shifter, the Camry Hybrid doesn’t offer much in the way of engagement with the road. Suspension and steering all feel tuned for comfort, making for an easy driving experience. That’s not to say the steering wasn’t precise, it just wasn’t tuned to communicate any road feel.
The Camry Hybrid mixes power from its gasoline and electric sources seamlessly.
The Camry Hybrid mixes power from its gasoline and electric sources seamlessly. If I wanted to know what was going on with the hybrid drivetrain, I could watch a power animation on its dashboard LCD, or just check if the green EV icon was lit on the dashboard. Impressively, that green EV light showed up even when I was cruising along at freeway speeds.
I find braking in the Camry Hybrid, and most hybrids for that matter, rewarding. Instead of burning up brake pads and bringing the car closer to an expensive maintenance appointment, I knew that the car was actually saving its friction brake and largely relying on regenerative braking, recharging its battery pack to give it more electric boost. Every stop is like a mini fill-up.
As with many hybrid cars, the Camry Hybrid does away with the traditional tachometer in favor of a power gauge.
Toyota
During my testing period, I got to put the Camry Hybrid up against the Chevrolet Malibu Hybrid and Ford Fusion Hybrid in a half-mile drag race. Flooring it off the line, the Camry Hybrid took a moment figuring out that I wanted all its power, losing valuable time, but then picked up speed. Its 200 horsepower gave it an edge over the competition, beating the other hybrids across the finish line. A little better programming on the throttle for a better start and its victory would have been much more devastating.
However, those competitors beat the Camry Hybrid handily on fuel economy. Where I managed about 42 mpg on a test loop, the others achieved numbers in the high 40s.
Joule review – CNET
More about sous vide
- Anova Precision Cooker Bluetooth + Wi-Fi
- WiFi Nomiku
- A test kitchen food fight: sous vide or not sous vide?
Editors’ note, August 9, 2016: ChefSteps announced this week that it reduced the retail price of the Joule to $199 and the preorder price to $149. People who preordered the Joule at the higher price will receive a refund for the difference.
There’s not much to look at when you unbox the Joule immersion circulator. But that’s the point of the latest connected sous vide machine that’s on its way to American kitchens.
ChefSteps, the Seattle-based food and technology company that created the Joule, will begin shipping it in September to customers who preordered the $299 device. You use the Joule for a cooking method called sous vide in which you vacuum-seal food in a plastic bag and cook the food in a controlled environment, like a water bath. Like other immersion circulators, you put the Joule in water, and it circulates and heats the water to precise temperatures for cooking.
We got our hands on a beta version of the Joule, so I compared it to similar sous vide immersion circulators we’ve reviewed and cooked one steak. I still have more testing to do, but here are some initial observations about and first impressions of the Joule:
The Joule heats water for a sous vide steak.
Chris Monroe/CNET
-
The Joule stands out by standing up. The device has a strong magnet on the bottom so you can put the device right in the middle of your water bath (as long as you’re using a magnetic steel pot or induction-ready cookware). Most immersion circulators clip to the side of your container. Joule has the clip option, too, for other types of cookware, but it’s nice to see a different design for this type of product.
(From left to right) The WiFi Nomiku, the Joule and the Anova Precision Cooker Bluetooth Wi-Fi
Chris Monroe/CNET
- Speaking of design, the Joule has a much simpler look than its competitors. The device is an 11-inch tall, white column that looks like a mod-inspired lightsaber handle. A power button on top is the only sort of built-in control. This lack of physical controls stands out, especially when you compare the Joule with the WiFi Nomiku, which has a turn wheel for setting the temperature. And the Joule is also smaller than its competitors.
- The Joule needs its app more than any other sous vide device. Wi-Fi and Bluetooth enabled sous vide machines such as the WiFi Nomiku and the Anova Precision Cooker Bluetooth + Wi-Fi let you set your desired temperature and adjust device settings from a smartphone app, but they always have some sort of controls built right onto the device. The Joule forgoes buttons and touchscreen controls and makes it mandatory to use the iOS and Android-compatible app to sous vide. The app has one of the most informative and polished interfaces I’ve seen on a sous vide-centric app. Recipes are divided into three categories: basic guides, ultimate guides for more advanced cooking and grilling guides. Each recipe has step-by-step instructions that include short video clips with each step that show you exactly what you’re supposed to be doing. So far, the app is impressive, but it makes me nervous how heavily the Joule relies on the app. What if I lose my phone but want to cook a bomb pork belly?
App instructions for preparing a sous vide steak (left), and a notification when the steak was finished (right).
Screenshots by Ashlee Clark Thompson/CNET
- You can watch the Joule circulate water in a new way. The components that make immersion circulators like the Nomiku and Anova work are hidden away on the inside of the device with openings at the bottom end that let the devices heat and circulate the water. The Joule, however, brings water into the device and spits it out through a small hole on its side. It’s like watching a small water fountain right in your pot.
- I’ve only cooked one dish, and it was delicious. I followed the Joule’s recipe for basic steak and cooked a strip steak for one hour in 136-degree Fahrenheit water. It came out medium, which was the intended result, and still juicy.
Polar M600 review
Throughout the past few years, we’ve had to choose one or the other – fitness trackers or smartwatches. Dedicated fitness trackers might be better at tracking your daily activity and heart rate, but they normally lack things like voice commands and proper notification support – two features normally found only on smartwatches. Sure, there’s always the option of buying a fitness tracker and a smartwatch, but that’s not a very elegant solution for those who are looking to wear just one device at a time.
But what if you don’t want to choose between a smartwatch and a fitness tracker? That’s where the Polar M600 comes in.
With a built-in GPS, optical heart rate sensor and plenty of other essentials found in higher-end fitness trackers, the new Polar M600 certainly brings a lot to the table. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the device, though, is the fact that it’s running Android Wear, Google’s smartwatch OS.
Does the M600 offer up enough to warrant its high price tag? Or should you opt for something else? We find that out, and more, in our full Polar M600 review.
In an effort to bring both our readers and viewers the most comprehensive review experience possible, the Polar M600 was reviewed by two different members of Android Authority. Both Joshua Vergara and I (Jimmy Westenberg) collaborated on this review.
We have both been using the Polar M600 as our main fitness tracker for roughly three weeks.
Show More
Related:
Best fitness trackers
3 weeks ago
Design
It’s clear that Polar set out to create a true fitness tracker/smartwatch hybrid device with the M600. While that may be the case on the software front, this thing doesn’t look anything like the other smartwatches currently on the market. Rather, its overall shape and size bares a slight resemblance to Garmin’s vívoactive HR, mostly because of its big, bulky design. In fact, the M600 is actually quite a bit bigger than the vívoactive HR. It measures 13mm thick, compared to the vívoactive HR’s 11.4mm.
Don’t miss:
Garmin vívoactive HR review
September 19, 2016
One of the biggest downsides of a bulky device like this is that users could potentially feel less inclined to put it on every day. Especially for sleep tracking, this isn’t the most comfortable device to wear on your wrist, so try to keep that in mind if you’re looking for a comfortable, wrist-mounted activity tracker.
On top of the size issues some may have with the M600, the design of the device is quite bland, overall. While there are a few things that help the device stand out, such as the chrome bezels on the left and right edges and Gorilla Glass 3 screen, we can’t help but think that the M600’s design feels a bit uninspired. Polar might not be in the business of creating fashionable fitness accessories, but it’s hard not to compare it to the work Fitbit is doing with its latest activity trackers.
One of the more positive aspects of the M600’s design is support for interchangeable straps. This means if your strap breaks for some reason, you can pick up a spare on Amazon for about $30 without replacing the whole unit. The M600’s straps remind us a lot of the ones found on the Moto 360 Sport. They’re very rubbery and tend to collect a lot of dust and fuzz. It’s a small gripe, really, but should still be kept in mind if you own any dogs or cats.
See also:
Moto 360 Sport review
March 4, 2016
Forget ever using the M600 with a suit or even a button up shirt
Smartwatches often try to toe the line between style and functionality, given that they often need to be quite thick in order to accommodate the technology underneath the screen. The problem with the Polar M600 is that it makes no such effort. For a watch that is supposed to be useful in more than just active situations, we felt like we could only use the watch when we were exercising or outdoors. Forget ever using the M600 with a suit or even a button up shirt – while we don’t have any problem letting others know we are active people, this fitness watch finds a way to make it a little too obvious.
The M600 also carries an IPX8 waterproof rating, which means it’s suitable for swimming up to 10 meters. This is certainly one of the more positive aspects in the design department, as it means you can not only track your swims, you also don’t need to worry about it getting wet if you’re near a pool.
Now let’s talk about the display. The M600 sports a 1.3-inch TFT display with a resolution of 240 x 240, resulting in a pixel density of 260ppi. We’ve been quite happy with the quality and responsiveness of the display, though it does seem a tad small compared to the overall size of the device.
The M600 has two physical buttons – one right below the display and another off to the left. The leftmost button acts as a home button, which can also be used to wake up the display if you don’t want to swipe to wake it. The button below the display is the activity button, and pressing it will bring you to Polar’s built-in training application. From here, you get two options – Training and My day. The Training section is where you’ll go to select which workout you’d like to perform, and the My day section will give you a snapshot of the current day’s activity. You can only see your steps, distance and calories progress from this screen though; for everything else, you’ll need to open the Polar Flow app on your phone.
Features and performance
The Polar M600 is one of the most feature-rich fitness trackers we’ve tested
The Polar M600 is one of the most feature-rich fitness trackers we’ve tested. As for daily activity tracking, it’ll keep track of your steps taken, distance traveled, calories burned, resting and active heart rate, and sleep. In order for the M600 to track any of these things, you’ll first need to download the Polar Flow app on your Android or iOS smartphone. Once that’s downloaded, sync your M600 to the app and you’re ready to start tracking.
It’s also worth noting that Polar Flow has a desktop client and a browser version, too, if you’d rather look at your activity history on a computer. It’s definitely refreshing to see a fitness-focused Android Wear device with a robust companion app. While Google Fit and Moto Body are easy to use, simplistic applications, Polar Flow is much more to our liking. More on that later, though.
Before you take the M600 out for its first workout, we recommend opening up Polar Flow and navigating to the Sport Profiles section. This is where you’ll be able to load up to 20 different sport profiles on your M600 to select before you start working out. You can ‘only’ load 20 onto your device at one time, but there are over a hundred to choose from. Some of the most common Sport Profiles are running, hiking, walking, spinning, road cycling, jogging, indoor cycling and strength training. It can also track other sports like baseball, hockey and football, too.
We should clarify something here – the M600 may be able to track your activity during your Finnish baseball match or judo training class, but it won’t give you granular feedback based on that specific sport. For instance, it might be able to track your activity during your rowing class, but it won’t give you stroke rate or stroke count information.
Unlike Fitbit and some Garmin devices, the M600 doesn’t come with automatic activity recognition
Whichever sport you choose to participate in, though, you’ll need to remember to tell the device to record your activity beforehand. Unlike Fitbit and some Garmin devices, the M600 doesn’t come with automatic activity recognition. Sometimes it can be difficult to remember to record your workouts manually, but it’s only a few more buttons.
This is where we’ve found the Polar ecosystem to be one of the best in the fitness game. While the M600 may not be able to figure out automatically what kind of workout you’re performing, it will take into account the rigorousness of the current activity and put it towards your overall fitness for the day. And to that end, Polar does not solely rely on step counts in order to figure out users’ overall fitness. Instead, it uses a combination of sensors to know if the user is lying down, sitting, standing, walking, running, or otherwise being active. Based on the aggressiveness of activity, it will put the steps toward its overall count.
More importantly, however, the device will add it all to an overall percentage that, when completed, means that optimal fitness has been achieved for that day. We feel this is much better than other fitness trackers that rely only on steps (looking at you, Samsung, and your ridiculous 6,000 step goal by default) because it takes into account how rigorous the said steps are. Think of it this way: let’s say you paced around for a long time during the day and hit 10,000 steps – because you weren’t really exerting a lot of energy in doing so, you might only get to about 60% of the day’s overall optimal fitness.
See also:
Gear Fit 2 review – can Samsung get fitness tracking right?
July 11, 2016
The M600 will also let you know if you’ve been sitting down too long. Every 55 minutes you’ll get an inactivity alert, and that’s when it’s time to get up and take a walk, stretch or light jog. If you don’t get up and move within five minutes, you’ll get an inactivity stamp on your Polar Flow timeline.
The M600 has been quite accurate in terms of step, calorie and distance tracking
But how well does it perform? Throughout our testing, the M600 has been quite accurate in terms of step, calorie and distance tracking. Thanks to the built-in GPS, accurate distance tracking shouldn’t come as a surprise on the M600. This is especially good news for runners and cyclists who need accurate distance metrics, and the Polar Flow app does a great job at displaying this information.
When you’re done recording a workout, you can head into the Polar Flow app and view your past exercises in the Training section. Once you select your workout, click on the map, then use the slider on the bottom to scroll through your route. Polar Flow will give you granular details based on where you were in your route, how fast you were going, your pace at that time, and your heart rate. You can see a good example of this in the screenshots attached below.
If you’re at all familiar with Polar’s other products, you’re probably aware that the company has made a name for itself by producing high-quality, accurate heart rate monitors. With that said, it should come as no surprise that the M600 sports a very impressive optical heart rate monitor, complete with six LED lights.
Throughout this review period, we’ve tested the M600’s heart rate monitor against the Wahoo TICKR X. From what we’ve been able to gather, the M600 has one of the most accurate wrist-mounted heart rate monitors we’ve used thus far. When comparing it to the TICKR X, the M600 was never off by more than 4bpm or so, even during high-intensity workouts. We usually see wrist-mounted heart rate monitors slip up when reaching upwards of 160bpm, but we’re happy to say the M600 experienced no such problems.
Take a look at the screenshots attached above. The two on the left are from the Polar Flow app, while the two on the right are from the Wahoo TICKR X. As you can see, the M600’s heart rate monitor had no problems keeping up with the TICKR X during the highs and lows of the workout. If you’d like a more detailed look at the M600’s heart rate recordings, see the screenshot below.
If you’d rather not use the M600’s built-in heart rate sensor, you can pair it with a third-party chest strap
If you’d rather not use the built-in heart rate sensor on the M600, though, you can pair it with a third-party chest strap. Not only will this give you more accurate heart rate data, pairing a chest strap to the M600 is easy. Just press the center button on your M600 (the one below the screen), then tap Training. If your chest strap is turned on, you should see a connect option on your screen. Tap that, and you’re good to go. Your M600 will now use the heart rate data from your chest strap.
Another bonus: once your chest-mounted heart rate monitor is connected, you can take the M600 off. This is useful for those times when the watch is simply too big for the activity being done (like hitting a punching bag, as it is too difficult to get gloves on while wearing the M600). You will still get an accurate reading of the exercise being done via the continuous heart rate monitoring from the strap.
While the Polar M600 doesn’t offer up automatic activity recognition, it does, however, record sleep automatically. There’s no need to tap a sleep now button or anything before you pass out. Just fall asleep with the device strapped to your wrist, wake up, and your sleep data will be recorded in the Polar Flow app. The M600 will record your total time asleep, restful sleep percentage, restful sleep time, and restless sleep time. Those are the only stats you’ll get by default, but since this is Android Wear, you can download a third-party app like Sleep as Android if you need more granular stats.
Also read: The best sleep trackers
From what we’ve been able to tell, the M600 is very accurate at tracking sleep, though we would have liked to see more sleep stats offered up by default. Polar Flow doesn’t display sleep cycle information, for instance.
Under the hood, the M600 sports a MediaTek MT2601 processor backed by 512MB of RAM. That’s par for the course when compared to other Android Wear devices on the market. Plus, it comes with 4GB of on-board storage, so you can save your favorite playlist locally for offline listening with a pair of Bluetooth earbuds.
The device also features a 500mAh battery, which Polar says will be able to get you about two full days of use or eight hours of training on a single charge. And for the most part, that’s absolutely correct. With moderate use, we’ve had no problems getting the M600 to last two full days, even with roughly an hour’s worth of exercise tracking on each day. If you’re constantly receiving notifications, replying to text messages or using Google Maps to navigate from your watch, however, the device will probably last closer to one full day.
Compared to the other Android Wear devices on the market, the M600’s two-day battery life is very impressive.
A quick tip – turn on Do Not Disturb when you sleep. It’ll keep the notifications from coming in and the alarm will still go off. After getting into this habit for just about any wearable, we’ve found battery life to be much closer to the claims that the various companies make. Two days is great for the Polar M600, but we could have done away with the proprietary charging cable that Polar uses for most of their peripherals. A microUSB connection would have worked just fine, as it did with the previous M400. Why they felt the need to go to a completely different charging connector is beyond us.
| Display | 1.3-inch TFT display 240 x 240 resolution, 260ppi Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Processor | 1.2GHz dual-core MediaTek MT2601 |
| RAM | 512MB |
| Storage | 4GB |
| Battery | 500mAh |
| Heart rate sensor | Yes, optical heart rate sensor with 6 LED lights |
| GPS | Yes |
| Other sensors | Accelerometer, Ambient Light Sensor, Gyroscope, Vibration motor, Microphone |
| Water resistance | Yes, IPX8 Suitable for swimming, up to 10 meters |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth 4.2 Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Software | Android Wear |
| Notifications | Call, text, calendar alerts, and more |
| Compatibility | Android phones running 4.3 Jelly Bean or higher iPhone 5 or later running iOS 8.2 or higher |
| Dimensions and weight | 45x36x13mm 63g |
Software
One of the most unique aspects of the M600 is its software, and that’s mainly due to the fact that this is one of the first fitness-focused Android Wear devices we’ve seen thus far. The Polar M600 is running Android Wear 6.0.1, version 1.5.0.3062003.
As we all know by now, Google doesn’t give OEMs too much wiggle room in terms of the customization of Android Wear. Thus, the on-device software package that ships on the M600 will seem incredibly familiar to those who have used an Android Wear device in the past. Polar does include a good amount of its own watch faces, but only two of them display activity data on the screen. Plus, none of Polar’s watch faces are customizable, so you’ll need to download a third-party watch face if you’re looking to give your M600 a unique look.
While Polar’s implementation of Android Wear is familiar, we’ve also experienced quite a few bugs. We’ve paired our M600 with the Galaxy S7 Edge, HTC 10 and Nexus 6P throughout this review period, and we’ve found bugs and inconsistencies when paired to each device. For instance, the first time we paired the device with our HTC 10, an error would occur whenever we tried deleting emails from the watch. Perhaps the most notable bug we’ve discovered occurs when pairing the watch to a new phone. Our M600 has frozen up during the pairing process multiple times, forcing us to restart the watch and start the pairing process from the beginning. This wouldn’t be an issue if it happened just once or twice, but the fact that it happens multiple times during each setup is obviously an issue.
Related:
Best Android Wear watches
3 weeks ago
Aside from the software bugs, we’ve been quite impressed with the device’s OS. With Android Wear, you’ll get notifications from as many applications as you’d like, voice commands, silent alarms, music playback, and much more. Plus, if Polar Flow doesn’t offer a certain type of functionality, you can simply download your favorite third-party fitness tracking app and use that instead. Fitness stats might be more streamlined in Polar’s own Flow app, but other options are there if you need them.
Oh, and because this is an Android Wear device, all of your fitness activity will also be recorded in Google Fit. Google’s fitness app is simplistic and intuitive, though the fitness-focused crowd will be much better off using Polar Flow.
The combination of Android Wear and Polar’s own software makes things too cluttered
This, however, makes this combination a little bit confusing for most users, especially those who have already enjoyed previous Polar models. The M400 software was updated recently so that it could provide notifications to the user via beeps (the M400 does not have vibration feedback) and through a simple text display using its typical digital watch screen. To that end, having Android Wear and all that it brings makes notifications and app connections a lot better, but when you can use just about any other fitness tracking software over Polar’s own built-in app, things seem just a little too cluttered in the end. Polar already does a great job with their own app, which makes it all the more confusing. We’re all for freedom of software choice, but we don’t expect existing Polar users to really go for the M600 simply because it has Android Wear, especially considering the M400 is much of the way there and costs much less.
Read more: The best fitness tracking apps for Android
The Polar Flow app is where you’ll be spending most of your time, and that’s a good thing. We’ve found the app to be a joy to use over the past few weeks. It’s well designed, intuitive, and gives you plenty of granular information without coming off as cluttered.
The app is divided up into three main sections: Feed, Activity and Training. The first section, Feed, is basically a timeline of your daily activity, which displays a snapshot of your activity statistics for each day. You’ll be able to see your total active time, calories burned and total steps taken. And if you connect with friends, you’ll be able to see, comment on and thumbs up their activity.
The next section, Activity, is where you’ll see your daily, weekly and monthly activity. Daily activity is displayed in a unique clock-like view, showing your activity type for each time of day. It’s a good way to visualize just how lazy or active you tend to be at certain points in the day. Additionally, Polar Flow will tell you how much time you’ve spent lying down, sitting, standing, walking, or working out for each day, which has also proven to be quite useful. Many fitness apps simply tell you how much exercise you’ve done for each day, but not many will tell you how long you’ve been lying down or sitting. As for week and month views within the Activity section, you’ll see a graph in each section which displays your activity levels overtime, as well as a percentage detailing your daily goal completion average.
If you need to look back on any previous activity, head to the Training section of the app. You’ll get a simple calendar view on the top of the screen, where you can navigate to a specific day and get detailed information on each one of your workouts.
Aside from the few hiccups here and there, we’ve been huge fans of the M600’s software package overall. The combination of Polar’s robust fitness tracking features and Android Wear make for an all-around great fitness tracking experience.
Gallery
Should you buy it?
The crux of the M600 is how it fits into the giant world of fitness trackers, and unfortunately that’s the device’s biggest downfall. Without looking at its price point, the M600 is a well-performing fitness smartwatch that’s packed with features. Not only does it offer up an accurate heart rate monitor and GPS capabilities, it’s also compatible with tons of third-party applications thanks to Android Wear. While the software package as a whole may be a bit buggy sometimes, the software package overall has impressed us over the past few weeks.
In a world where Garmin’s vívoactive HR is available for around $200, it’s tough to recommend the M600
We also need to talk about the M600’s price point, though, and the fact that it costs about $80-$100 more than some of the higher-end fitness trackers out there. The Polar M600 is available for $329.95, and there are a few reasons for that steep price tag. GPS fitness trackers always cost quite a bit more than ones without this feature. Plus, since this is an Android Wear smartwatch, that also warrants a higher price tag. But in a world where Garmin’s vívoactive HR is available for a little over $200 and boasts just about the same feature set (minus the Android Wear part), it’s tough to recommend the M600.
It’s also hard to recommend this watch to anyone that is already a part of the Polar ecosystem. Sure, there might be users out there who will really want Android Wear on their existing watch, and that’s quite literally what the M600 is. But in the scheme of sheer fitness tracking, the M600 doesn’t offer anything too different from the company’s existing trackers. Because of that, any current Polar users will probably find the price way too high to change it up.
If you’re looking for a true fitness tracker/smartwatch hybrid and don’t mind paying upwards of $300 to get that experience, you should absolutely buy the M600. But if you’d rather save some money and don’t mind living without Android Wear, we’d recommend passing on this one and going for the vívoactive HR.
What are your thoughts? Does the Polar M600 have you interested? Be sure to let us know your thoughts in the comments below!
Next:
The best smartwatches
3 weeks ago
How an obscure rule lets law enforcement search any computer
With today’s amendments to Rule 41, the statute that regulates legal search and seizure, the US Department of Justice has a new weapon to fight cyber crime — but it’s a double-edged sword. The changes expand the FBI’s ability to search multiple computers, phones and other devices across the country, and even overseas, on a single warrant. In an increasingly connected world, amending the rules is both necessary for law enforcement agencies and deeply concerning for digital privacy advocates. And for everyday citizens, it’s a little bit of both.
Today’s changes allow judges to issue warrants for federal agencies to remotely access, search, seize and copy digital information that’s been concealed via anonymizing software like Tor or a VPN. The changes also allow judges to grant warrants for the search, seizure and copying of information on any connected device that’s attacked in a hacking campaign. Officially, the amendments read as follows:
“A magistrate judge with authority in any district where activities related to a crime may have occurred has authority to issue a warrant to use remote access to search electronic storage media and to seize or copy electronically stored information located within or outside that district if: (A) the district where the media or information is located has been concealed through technological means; or (B) in an investigation of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5), the media are protected computers that have been damaged without authorization and are located in five or more districts.”
Two recent hacking instances offer insight into how these new rules might play out in the real world.
First up, the FBI’s global Dark Web pedophilia sting, Operation Pacifier: In 2015, the FBI took over a child pornography website on the Dark Web and, over the course of two weeks, deployed malware to users in order to bypass the anonymizing software and catch 1,500 pedophiles. FBI agents did this on the order of a single warrant issued by a magistrate judge. In the ensuing court battles, some defense lawyers successfully argued that the entire sting relied on an invalid warrant.
At the same time, a senior US District Court judge ruled the FBI did not need a warrant at all to infiltrate a stateside computer, saying, “Generally, one has no reasonable expectation of privacy in an IP address when using the internet.”
The new Rule 41 addresses this issue head-on. Now, a magistrate judge does indeed have the authority to issue a warrant allowing federal agents to search and seize any number of computers within or outside of that judge’s district.
Secondly, there’s the Mirai botnet attack that shut down internet service across the country in late October. Hackers took advantage of weak security protocols in connected home devices like security cameras, DVRs and routers to hit a large domain name server with a distributed denial of service attack that took out Twitter, Spotify, Reddit, The New York Times and other major websites.
In this case, the new rules would let a judge issue a warrant allowing federal agents to search, seize and copy all of the information on these hacked IoT devices. Yes, the victims of the hack are open to digital search and seizure.
This potential scenario worries privacy advocates like the Electronic Frontier Foundation. The organization wrote in a blog post, “Government access to the computers of botnet victims also raises serious privacy concerns, as a wide range of sensitive, unrelated personal data could well be accessed during the investigation. This is a dangerous expansion of powers, and not something to be granted without any public debate on the topic.”
Additionally, the first part of the amendment, which targets people using anonymizing software to obscure their location or identity, is vague enough to apply to a broad range of common services, the EFF argues.
“For example, people who use Tor, folks running a Tor node, or people using a VPN would certainly be implicated,” the EFF says. “It might also extend to people who deny access to location data for smartphone apps because they don’t feel like sharing their location with ad networks. It could even include individuals who change the country setting in an online service, like folks who change the country settings of their Twitter profile in order to read uncensored tweets.”
On the other hand, the benefits for law enforcement are clear: The FBI and other agencies need a way to track and prosecute crimes that take place on the Dark Web or by people using privacy software to hide their identities. Rule 41 now enables the Justice Department to operate in an online world.
“From a law enforcement agent’s perspective, yes, we need these kinds of rules, obviously,” says Gail-Joon Ahn, director of Arizona State University’s Center for Cybersecurity and Digital Forensics. “But from the victim’s perspective — the actual victim as well as the witness — when they present their evidence, their mobile phone or computer, to law enforcement agencies, they have a concern. They are willing to share some evidence related to particular crimes but they may not want to share all the information [on their devices].”
The new Rule 41 could deter hacking victims or people with information about illegal online activity from even coming forward, over concerns that their personal information would become part of the investigation, Ahn says. However, the FBI and other federal agencies need to be able to track and prosecute cyber criminals, and the new rules will be immensely helpful in that regard. Agents face strict rules when it comes to preparing a case for court, and current regulations don’t address many new forms of online communication, giving cyber criminals ample opportunity to escape justice.
Ahn lays out the four rules of evidence in computer forensics as follows:
- Admissibility: The evidence must be legally collected.
- Accuracy: The information collected should point directly to a particular identity or particular groups acting illegally.
- Timeline: All of the information needs to connect, presenting the comprehensive story behind the case. If there are gaps in the timeline, that evidence can’t be used in court.
- Compliance: The tools used to collect the evidence must be explained and these systems can’t alter the evidence they’re collecting.
Today’s Rule 41 amendments are most closely related to steps 1 and 3, admissibility and timeline. FBI agents are now able to legally collect stores of digital information in order to present a complete picture to the court.
“From their perspective, they need more evidence to resolve their cases,” Ahn explains. “Obviously they need some power to access all the evidence in your systems, so that’s why they need these kinds of rules.”
The changes to Rule 41 are not inherently benign or evil. They’re an attempt to make the Department of Justice effective in the digital age, and the ethics behind these changes will only become clear as agencies actually use the updated ruleset. It’ll be a case-by-case scenario.
Rule 41 isn’t the end of the conversation about cyber security and privacy. As technology continues to advance, the federal government will attempt to keep up with criminals and citizens alike, using new, potentially double-edged, weapons along the way.
53 Oculus Rift titles will support Touch controllers at launch
We’re less than a week away from the December 6th release of the long-awaited Oculus Touch controllers, and it looks like lucky Rift owners will have plenty of reasons to use them. Oculus just announced that they’ll be launching with 53 supported titles. That includes existing games like The Climb and Job Simulator, as well as new entries like the magic multiplayer fest The Unspoken and the graffiti simulator Kingspray. Check out our coverage of those games, along with plenty of other intriguing Oculus Touch titles, from the company’s developer conference last month.
Looking ahead to 2017, Oculus says we can expect titles like Robo Recall, Arkitka.1 and Giant Copy: Justice Above. The company also revealed that its demo title Toybox will also be available for free when the Touch Controllers launch. That’ll join Medium, Quill and Dead and Buried among the free titles Oculus is offering, as well as the pre-order bonuses VR Sports and The Unspoken.
Source: Oculus
Apple Retail Stores Sporting Red Logos for World AIDS Day
Over 400 Apple retail stores around the world have red logos today, in recognition of World AIDS Day. The logos, which Apple has put up at its stores for the last several years on December 1, are meant to raise awareness for the global fight against AIDS.
Earlier this week, Apple announced plans to donate $1 to partner charity (RED) for every Apple Pay purchase made at an Apple Store, on Apple.com, or through the Apple Store app as part of a World AIDS Day campaign. Apple has pledged to donate up to $1 million during the event, which will last until December 6.
Bank of America is also making a donation for every Apple Pay transaction made using its cards from December 1 to December 7, with plans to donate up to $1 million.
In addition to its Apple Pay promotion, Apple has released several new PRODUCT(RED) items over the course of the last month, including an iPhone 7 Smart Battery Case, an iPhone SE case, a Beats Pill+ Portable Speaker, and Beats Solo3 Wireless Headphones. Throughout the year, a portion of the proceeds from PRODUCT(RED) sales goes to The Global Fund to put a stop to AIDS.
Several App Store apps are also offering limited-edition custom (RED) content for World AIDS Day, and all in-app purchase proceeds will be donated. Participating apps include popular titles like Best Fiends, Boom Beach, Clash of Clans, Candy Crush Jelly Saga, Farm Heroes Saga, PewDiePie’s Tuber Simulator, Hay Day, Plants vs. Zombies Heroes, and more.
Apple Stores around the world are @RED today for #WorldAIDSDay. Together we can #endAIDS. pic.twitter.com/yFrLua7IoR
— (RED) (@RED) December 1, 2016
The (RED) initiative has raised more than $365 million to date to stop AIDS in Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Rwanda, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, and Zambia. Funds raised by (RED) are donated to The Global Fund, a group that works to end AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria as epidemics.
Apple is one of (RED)’s biggest contributors and has donated nearly $120 million over the last 10 years.
Discuss this article in our forums
Daydream View headsets in Crimson and Snow now available for preorder
They will all look the same when your eyes are covered.
Google’s put the Crimson and Snow colors of the Daydream View headset up for pre-order at the device store today. Shipping starts December 8 and the price — $79 US — is the same as the gray version that was already available.
For that matter, everything else is the same, too. You’ll need to have a Daydream compatible phone — right now that means the Pixel or a Moto Z that’s been upgraded to Android 7 — an active Google account to install the stuff needed from Google Play, and some free time in an uncrowded room.
A spirit of adventure helps, too. Check ’em out at the link below.
See at Google
AIVAnet 