Skip to content

Archive for

9
Oct

Video Review: iBattz’s Mojo Refuel Invictus Case for iPhone 6s Plus Packs a Lot of Power, But Has Flaws


With the iPhone 6s and 6s Plus, Apple didn’t increase battery life over the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus, which means battery cases are going to remain a popular accessory for at least another year. In our latest video review, we went hands on with the ibattz Mojo Refuel Invictus battery case, which will fit the iPhone 6s Plus or the iPhone 6 Plus.

The ibattz is equipped with two removable and replaceable 3,000 mAh batteries, for a total capacity of 6,000 mAh. Each one of the batteries has enough juice to charge an iPhone 6 Plus or 6s Plus about 70 percent of the way, so combined, there’s enough power to keep an iPhone going for a couple of days.


With two batteries in the Invictus Refuel case, it’s quite heavy, but we didn’t think the case itself was too bulky considering it’s housing multiple batteries. There’s a power button at the bottom of the case with LEDs for each battery, so you can get an idea of how much battery is left at a glance. The case itself recharges using micro-USB.

We liked the power this case provided, but we weren’t a fan of the construction of the case itself. The materials felt a bit cheap and we were worried we’d break it putting it on the iPhone. The bulk of the phone also rendered the mute switch unusable due to a faulty mute switch on the case itself, so this is probably a case most users are going to want to pass on.

The Mojo Refuel Invictus for the iPhone 6 Plus and iPhone 6s Plus is available from the ibattz website for $129.95.

Note: MacRumors received no compensation for this review.


9
Oct

Apple Pay coming to Starbucks, KFC and Chili’s in the next year


OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

In a sign that Apple Pay is gaining traction with even more retailers, VP of Apple Pay Jennifer Bailey has just announced on stage at Code/Mobile a plan to roll out Apple Pay in Starbucks, KFC and Chili’s locations across the country. You can expect to see Apple Pay in a few pilot Starbucks outlets later this year, with a larger roll out in 2016. Apple Pay in KFC should start early next year, while Chili’s is expected to implement a unique pay-at-the-table mobile payment solution.

Bailey also talked about a broader effort to add loyalty programs to Apple Pay. Walgreens loyalty program should be added to Apple Pay soon, and there are plans in place to support programs from Kohl’s, Coca Cola, Whole Foods, Panera Bread and much more as well. One of the issues of adding loyalty programs like these is that it often requires an upgrade to the point-of-sale terminal so the process will likely take some time. There are also plans in place to support even more department store cards, which are often used as loyalty cards as well. “You’ll see many more large merchants adopt Apple Pay because of our ability to support store cards,” she said.

There are other avenues for Apple Pay beyond just the retailer too. In-flight mobile payment could be a growth area in the future, as she mentions that you can already use Apple Pay in JetBlue flights and Delta has just incorporated Apple Pay in its app today. They’re also looking at incorporating Apple Pay in gas stations.

“We see an acceleration in adoption in merchant acceptance,” she said, adding that the company is continuously working on more partnerships.

9
Oct

Instead of dislike, Facebook is testing ‘Reactions’ animated emoji


Last night Engadget brought you a sneak peek at Facebook’s new “Reactions” feature, and today the social network confirmed it’s now in testing. Instead of the often-requested “dislike” to counter the existing Like button, founder Mark Zuckerberg explains (in a video embedded after the break) that this idea is just about giving more options to express yourself. Whether or not the feelings of love, sadness and empathy are what you’re trying to project, the test is currently limited to users in Ireland and Spain. If you are there (or use a browser proxy service like Hola to fake it) you’ll see something like the picture above, after long pressing the Like button on the website or mobile apps. Depending on how things go, this could roll out to the rest of the billion or so Facebook users soon, but it looks like any official support for dislike is never going to be in the plans.

Source: Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook), Facebook Newsroom

9
Oct

HBO Go launching as a standalone streaming service in Latin America


HBO Latino: El Negocio - Private Dinner

HBO’s Go on-demand streaming service is set to launch in Latin America and the Caribbean as a standalone subscription product, the network revealed today. While HBO Go has been available in these areas for pay-TV subscribers, cord-cutters will soon be able to enjoy too — but with some added benefits. The service is expected to be similar to HBO Now, which is only available in the US, offering access to both live TV as well VOD content. HBO says it plans to rollout the service in Spanish-speaking markets across Latin America and the Caribbean, plus Brazil (Portuguese), by the end of this year. First up: Colombia, with more to follow thereafter.

[Image credits: Getty Images for HBO Latino]

9
Oct

Reuters: Uber hacking investigation is targeting a Lyft exec


Uber

There is very little love lost between car-platform rivals Lyft and Uber. Nowhere is that more apparent than in a Reuters’ article about anonymous sources pointing fingers at Lyft’s technology chief Chris Lambert as the probable cause of an Uber hack. According to the report, after a massive breach of driver information back in February, Uber launched an investigation to determine who got into its system. That led it to court to determine who was behind a Comcast IP address that had accessed the security key the ride-sharing company accidentally left on GitHub. Even though the filing draws no connection to the actual hack (which according to Reuters sources was routed through a Scandinavian VPN) the court ruled that the information was “reasonably likely” to help the company find the person (or persons) involved in the breach.

Uber as a company has not identified Lambert. In fact the Comcast subscriber has remained anonymous throughout the court proceedings. Still, it’s quite a leap to go from an IP address that accessed a publicly available file to outright hacking. The company believes that while there is no direct connection between the mystery Comcast IP and the hack, the identity of the person behind that address could shed some light on the breach. Which isn’t all that far fetched.

Lance Cottrell, chief scientist of security firm Ntrepid told Engadget this type of situation is “characteristic of the kind of mistakes people make when conducting an attack.” If the person behind the IP address stumbled onto the key while perusing Uber’s GitHub account, it’s already too late to start hiding who they are. It’s usually not until a bad actor starts an actual attack that they take precautions like using a VPN or public WiFi to hide their identity. Of course that’s if the anonymous internet user is actually responsible.

Cottrell also said we should question the thoroughness in which Uber excluded other IPs. It’s unclear how many IP addresses hit the file, was in the tens or hundreds? How did it determine if someone was nefarious or not? Also, if the key was buried pretty deep in the company’s GitHub page, there’s a good chance it wasn’t cached by Google. But if it wasn’t, Google could have cached the file and anyone could have grabbed it without leaving a trail.

Concerning the speculation that an Lyft employee may have had something to do with the breach, Lyft gave Engadget the following statement: “Uber allowed login credentials for their driver database to be publicly accessible on GitHub for months before and after a data breach in May 2014. We investigated this matter long ago and there are no facts or evidence that any Lyft employee, including Chris, downloaded the Uber driver information or database, or had anything to do with Uber’s May 2014 data breach.”

Uber declined to comment for this article.

[Image credit: Getty/AFP]

Source: Reuters

9
Oct

Facebook introduces ‘Reactions’ to give users more ways to share their reaction to a post


facebook_reactions_1

Today Facebook introduced an extension to the like button, giving users the ability to chose from six different emojis that portray their reaction to a post. The new feature is called ‘Reactions’ and will first launch in two test markets, Spain and Ireland, before Facebook decides to roll it out to the rest of the world. 

We’re excited to start this test, but understand that this is a big change, and one that we want to make sure to get right. So we’re starting by offering Reactions to Ireland and Spain, where people will be able to react to any post across Facebook – a post from a friend, advertiser, publisher or business.

facebook_reactions_emojis

The Reactions emojis will be located alongside the original like button. Facebook will use Reactions to have a better understanding of what each individual user is interested in, with the goal of making news feed content more relevant to that interest. According to Facebook, it will allow businesses and publishers to better understand users’ content demand and see how people are responding to their content on Facebook. Page owners will be able to see all of the reactions to their post on Page Insights.

The new feature is still under testing, and Facebook will improve on it as users provide feedback.

Source: Facebook
Via: Techcrunch

Come comment on this article: Facebook introduces ‘Reactions’ to give users more ways to share their reaction to a post

Visit TalkAndroid for Android news, Android guides, and much more!

9
Oct

Is OnePlus done? What next for the “Flagship Killer?”


oneplus 2 review aa (4 of 38)

Almost 18 months ago, a little known Chinese company by the name of OnePlus announced its arrival into a saturated marketplace in a big way, with the OnePlus One.

Dubbed the “Flagship Killer”, OnePlus adopted a strategy that revolved around viral marketing and aggressive pricing, and at the same time kept a high demand for their phone (or arguably the illusion of it) by making it difficult to buy, thanks to the (dreaded) invite system. The buzz around the company’s first handset was certainly large enough to see it through an entire year and while users have still ‘battled’ to get invites for this year’s OnePlus 2, the cracks are beginning to show in OnePlus’s armour.

Faced with rivals adopting parts of the model that proved so successful for OnePlus, coupled with the company’s public and abject failure in launching the OnePlus 2 properly, we’re asking: is the company done? Can it recover and if so, where does the “Flagship Killer” go from here?

What made OnePlus special?

Before we can look at the future of the company, we need to revisit its past to discover (and remind ourselves) of the things that made OnePlus special last year.


oneplus-logoSee also: Is OnePlus going to launch a Mini too?41

As a company, it launched with aplomb through clever teasers, a solid smartphone offering and a willingness to be public in its dislike of overpriced rival flagship devices. There’s an age-old saying that “You want what you can’t have” and this is a fundamental ingredient around the success of the OnePlus One; a short amount of supply.

OnePlus One in video:

.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;

.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;

.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;

@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;

@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;

body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;

body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;

Far too often, startups hope to dominate the world from day one and these lofty ambitions result in over estimation of demand, resulting in too much supply and a bottoming of the price. The net result is the company ends up selling its stock at a loss and eventually falls by the wayside. To prevent the same, OnePlus came up with the invite system, which allowed it to only produce enough handsets to meet demand but of course, the company underestimated the demand (or did it?), resulting in stock shortages for the better part of a year.

Aside from the inability to buy the OnePlus One, resulting in an increased desire for consumers to own one, the handset was also special as it was the first time we’d really seen a company offer a flagship handset at an affordable price (aside from perhaps the Nexus 4 and 5). Although the likes of Xiaomi had done this before in select markets, OnePlus gained significant global traction very quickly and much faster than any of the established players had managed.

Were we looking at the birth of a new force to be reckoned with in mobile? At the time, yes; now, over a year later and several months after the OnePlus 2, the answer is unequivocally no.

What went wrong for OnePlus?

In a word; the OnePlus 2.

The OnePlus One was fantastic as OnePlus shocked the industry by offering the same specs as the flagships of the year at a significantly lower cost, but in the year that passed between these two handsets, OnePlus’s rivals caught up and surpassed the company.

Let’s take a look at the OnePlus 2 specs and how it compares to the flagships:

  OnePlus 2 Galaxy S6 One M9 Xperia Z3+ LG G4
Display 5.5-inch LCD
Full HD (1920 x 1080)
5.1-inch AMOLED
QHD (2560×1440)
5-inch LCD
FullHD (1920×1080)
5.2-inch LCD
FullHD (1920×1080)
5.5-inch LCD
QHD (2560×1440)
SoC Snapdragon 810 Exynos 7420 Snapdragon 810 Snapdragon 810 Snapdragon 808
CPU 4x 2.0GHz Cortex-A57
4x 1.5GHz Cortex-A53
4x 2.1GHz Cortex-A57
4x 1.5GHz Cortex-A53
4x 2.0GHz Cortex-A57
4x 1.5GHz Cortex-A53
4x 2.0GHz Cortex-A57
4x 1.5GHz Cortex-A53
2x 1.8GHz Cortex-A57
4x 1.4GHz Cortex-A53
GPU Adreno 430 Mali-T760 MP8 Adreno 430 Adreno 430 Adreno 418
RAM 4GB (64GB model), 3GB (16GB model) 3GB 3GB 3GB 3GB
Storage 16/64GB 32/64/128GB 32GB 32GB 32GB
MicroSD No No Yes, up to 128GB Yes, up to 128GB Yes, up to 128GB
Unlocked Price $329 (16GB), $389 (64GB) $700 $650 $650 $540

Now let’s take a look at the OnePlus 2 specs again and this time, how it compares to other similarly priced handsets:

  OnePlus 2 Huawei Honor 7 Moto X Play Xiaomi Redmi Note 2 BLU Pure XL
Display 5.5-inch LTPS
Full HD (1920 x 1080)
401 ppi
5.2-inch IPS-NEO
Full HD (1920×1080)
424 ppi
5.5-inch IPS
Full HD (1920×1080)
401 ppi
5.5-inch IPS
Full HD (1920×1080)
401 ppi
6.0-inch AMOLED
QHD (2560×1440)
490 ppi
SoC Snapdragon 810 Kirin 935 Snapdragon 615 Mediatek Helio X10 Mediatek Helio X10
CPU 4×1.82GHz Cortex-A57
4×1.56GHz Cortex-A53
4×2.2GHz Cortex-A53
4×1.5GHz Cortex-A53
4×1.7GHz Cortex-A53
4×1.0GHz Cortex-A53
4×2.2GHz Cortex-A53
4×2.0GHz Cortex-A53
8×2.0GHz Cortex-A53
GPU Adreno 430 Mali-T628 MP4 Adreno 405 PowerVR G6200 PowerVR G6200
RAM 4GB (64GB)
3GB (16GB)
3GB 2GB 3GB (32GB)
2GB (16GB)
3GB
Storage 16/64GB 16/64GB 16/32GB 16/32GB 64GB
MicroSD No Yes, up to 128GB Yes, up to 128GB Yes, up to 32GB
(Chinese version)
Yes, up to 64GB
Camera 13MP rear
5MP front
20MP rear
8MP front (+LED flash)
21MP rear
5MP front
13MP rear
5MP front
24MP rear
8MP front
Video 4K, 1080p, 720p slo-mo 1080p, HDR 1080p 1080p 4k, 1080p, HDR
Camera Features: OIS
Laser Autofocus
OIS Phase Detection AutoFocus
Effective Stabilisation
Phase Detection AutoFocus OIS
Laser Autofocus
NFC No No Yes TBC Yes
Battery: 3300mAh
Non-removable
3100mAh
Non-removable
3630mAh
Non-removable
3060mAh
Removable
3500mAh
Removable
LTE LTE Cat 4 (150/50) LTE Cat 6 (300/50) Yes (Cat TBC) Yes (Cat TBC) LTE Cat 4 (150/50)
Other Features: Dual SIM
Fingerprint Sensor
USB Type-C
Dual SIM
Fingerprint Sensor
Fast Charging
Fast Charging Fast Charging Dual SIM
Fingerprint Sensor
USB Type-C
Unlocked Price $329 (16GB)
$389 (64GB)
~$381 (16GB, £249) ~$426 (16GB, £270)
~$487 (32GB, £319)
$128/$144 (16GB)
$160 (32GB)
$349

As you can see, OnePlus ‘suddenly’ faces significant competition from more established players who have the distribution channels and partners to put their devices into more hands quicker than OnePlus can.

Coupled with this, OnePlus also failed in the launch of the OnePlus 2, which the company has publicly admitted; ahead of the handset’s launch, OnePlus said they would have 30 to 50 times the amount of inventory, yet they repeatedly missed dates for releasing invites and even after the handset’s “launch” on August 11th, customers with invites couldn’t buy the handset. The dreaded invite system, which worked so well for the company in its first handset, proved to be its downfall.

The OnePlus 2 also has another big issue; value for money. Last year, customers rushed to become part of OnePlus’ flock as the OnePlus One offered the same specs as handsets that were double (or more) the price. Ahead of the announcement, the rumours looked to be that the OnePlus 2 would do just this, with rumours suggesting that a Quad HD display, NFC, outstanding camera and much more would all make it onboard.

What actually transpired was that the OnePlus 2 failed to bring the Quad HD screen we expected – instead it has a 5.5-inch Full HD display that doesn’t stand out in anyway – and failed to have NFC, with the company suggesting they left it out as no-one uses NFC. There’s just one slight problem with the latter; mobile payments are growing to become a large part of the smartphone industry and the lack of NFC immediately rules out the OnePlus 2 from this key growth market.

Furthermore, OnePlus launched the OnePlus 2 by saying it was a “2016 Flagship Killer” and this is certainly a bold claim from the company. Let’s look at the OnePlus 2 specs again and when you’re reading through them, ask yourself one question: would a flagship handset in 2016 with these specs interest you or will the industry have moved on? I know what I think.

   
Display 5.5-inch LCD, Full HD
Processor 1.8GHz Snapdragon 810
RAM 3 or 4 GB (depending on storage option)
Storage 16 or 64GB storage
Networks US GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900MHz WCDMA: Bands: 1/2/4/5/8 FDD-LTE: Bands: 1/2/4/5/7/8/12/17EU/India GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900MHz WCDMA: Bands: 1/2/5/8 FDD-LTE: Bands: 1/3/5/7/8/20
Software OxygenOS based on Android 5.1
MicroSD No
Dual-SIM Yes
Wireless Charging No
Fingerprint Scan Yes
Camera 13MP rear
5MP front
Battery 3,300mAh
Dimensions 151.8 x 74.9 x 9.85 mm, 175g

The success of OnePlus last year was also largely down to the company being an unknown player with customers unaware of how the company would handle repairs, support and returns. Naturally, with the OnePlus One proving to be so appealing, these questions were put to the back of customer’s minds but a year later, customers had a lot more information and it wasn’t pleasant reading for OnePlus.

Simply put, the company doesn’t understand returns, repairs or support. Looking across the interwebs, there’s a lot of complaints about the company’s lack of action when it came to fixing issues and even when you want to return your handset.

Some of you may point towards these being false but I can say that they seem to be accurate; a friend of mine (Holly Brockwell) had a range of issues with her OnePlus One and when requested a repair, OnePlus asked her to provide video proof of each individual fault before they would even discuss the repair. To take it a step further, the company seems to have outsourced its entire customer service department with Holly receiving the following reply to an initial email about battery life concerns: “I’m sorry to hear about the problem with your XXX”.

While these were issues when dealing with the OnePlus One, it doesn’t seem that the company has improved this much in the year that’s passed. Looking at the OnePlus forums, there’s certainly a lot of people who feel the hype has died and, although I’ve not used one extensively (but have briefly), I do feel the same.

Yes, the OnePlus 2 is definitely a lovely phone and it has a lot of positives but from a marketing perspective, the handset fails in its bid to be a 2015 Flagship Killer, let alone a 2016 Flagship Killer as OnePlus is dubbing it.

What next? Is OnePlus done?

So what next for the Chinese company that has grown to be similar to marmite in that you love it or you don’t. Can it survive in a market where the big names are now encroaching into the same part of the market that OnePlus so successfully carved a niche in for itself?

In a word: maybe.

Being a startup, OnePlus has had to be different in its approach to ensure the long term survival of the company, but while the approach certainly worked with its first handset, the company misjudged exactly what its competition would do this year. There’s no denying that the company does understand customers and what they want from a smartphone but some decisions in the OnePlus 2 make no sense. NFC chipsets are certainly not expensive and the decision to leave it out of the OnePlus, coupled with the rest of the specs, suggests the company’s bottom line has come before the same fact that set it apart; flagship specs at a reduced price.

OnePlus 2 in video:

.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;

.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;

.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;

@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;

@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;

body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;

body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;

Yes, the company can easily release another handset next year and it might pick up from the OnePlus One and prove to be a real flagship killer but doing so would only admit that the OnePlus 2 was a mistake.

What else can they do? Some suggestions include merging with another company – after all, OnePlus co-founder does want to intern at Samsung (read into that what you will), attempting to release another handset (but would it be successful?) or even being aggressive with pricing to really drive the cost of smartphones down.

All of these suggestions could theoretically work on paper but in truth, it does seem that OnePlus’ time is coming to an end. Had they launched the OnePlus One a year earlier and this year’s OnePlus 2 last year, it’s quite likely we’d have a completely different tale to tell but the fact is; in the past year, the big OEMs have launched heavily into the mid-range marketplace and rather than OnePlus offering flagship specs at a mid-range price, the company is now arguably just another mid-range player.

It will continue to sell a few phones but the glory days certainly seem to be over. After all, if companies such as BLU can offer a flagship phone with a Quad HD display and NFC at the same price as the OnePlus 2, there’s really no reason that OnePlus couldn’t have. Apart from its bottom line, that is.

What do you think, agree with my assessment or disagree completely? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.

9
Oct

Android founder Andy Rubin looks beyond mobile to artificial intelligence


Andy Rubin

Forbes

Andy Rubin helped build the most widely-adopted mobile operating system in the world, and now he’s looking to the future.

When the Android co-founder left Google back in October 2014, his decision wasn’t necessarily surprising by any means. After all, he played a big role in how most folks around the world connect with each other, so it only makes sense that he would continue his goal to push technology forward as best as he can. We already know of Rubin’s new hardware startup incubator called Playground Global, but how will that help push technology forward in the future? During his talk at Code/Mobile earlier today, we got a good look at what the Father of Android has in store for us.


andy rubinRelated: Android co-founder Andy Rubin launches a tech hardware incubator called Playground Global3

When asked about the future of technology and computing, Rubin explained that the next big frontier has to do with technology that doesn’t necessarily have to have a screen, such as dishwashers or traffic lights. He’s talking about automation, artificial intelligence, and machines that can take the place of something a person used to do.

What I learned [at Google] is, assuming that the cloud and computing is going to evolve at a rapid pace, neural networks, deep learning and machine learning are also going to continue to evolve. There is a point in time – I have no idea when it is – where there is some form of AI that will be the next computing platform.

“Robotics and automation are going to permeate in our lives”, Rubin continues. And it’s clear that he’s pretty invested in this idea, too. Playground Global just recently invested a massive $15 million in CastAR, an augmented reality startup that’s based in Mountain View, California, among a few other notable projects.

This doesn’t particularly mean that mobile is going away anytime soon, though. Since mobile devices are so personal and in our pockets at all times, he believes that our smartphones will remain the main screen in our lives. Basically, the technology world needs to progress, and the next step, he says, is the introduction of artificial intelligence into our lives. That’s where we’ll see the next big push.

.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;

.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;

.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;

@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;

@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;

body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;

body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;

Rubin went on to talk about what Android has accomplished in its lifetime, and that he’s proud of the team at Google that decided to make Android an open OS. He pointed out that he’s pretty amazed at what you can purchase nowadays that runs Android – phones, tablets, televisions, smartwatches and more. But when asked if there was room for a third major operating system in the mobile space, he explained:

When we pitched Android, we had a deck that said “the world doesn’t need another mobile operating system”. What the world needed was an open operating system. Once you have an open system, innovation will be built on top of it. And it came true!

“The worst thing that would happen from a product perspective would be slowing down innovation,” said Rubin. Not that innovation is dead, by any means, but it has slowed down in recent years. He goes on to say that the most recent interesting thing that’s happened in the technology space in the United States is that users are no longer forced to sign a contract with a mobile service provider.


iphone-upgrade-planRelated: Would you like to see an Android OEM directly offer its own upgrade program?37

Previously, you’d walk into your local carrier store, sign up for a new phone number, pay a reduced price for your phone, and then be locked into a two-year contract. Now, with these new types of payment plans such as T-Mobile’s Jump!, AT&T’s Next program and even Apple’s iPhone Upgrade Program you can save money by either leasing a phone through a carrier or making monthly payments on the full price of that phone. He continues:

The carriers have always been “hit makers” — they choose which phones they’ll sell and which will be successful. They thought they had the pulse on what consumers wanted, but they’re not necessarily product companies.

[This new system] makes the U.S. look a lot more like China. 80 percent of phones in China are sold open market (not through a wireless carrier). We’re at the beginning, but the U.S. could look more like that in the future.

He also touched on the big “F” word in the Android community… fragmentation. This has been a huge point of contention among fans of mobile technology for some time. During the Q&A section of the talk, when asked if fragmentation was good for consumers, he explained that he doesn’t like to use the word ‘fragmentation’ because it has a negative connotation. He says, “I prefer ‘consumer choice’ as the positive side.” Instead of looking at Android through a fragmented lens, he decided to ask the question “should we write for one screen size?”

And that’s definitely worked out to Android’s advantage, too. This decision to not base Android around one screen size enabled the OS to reach automobiles, televisions, watches and more faster than any other company could.


what-is-iot-video-thumbnailDon’t miss: What is the Internet of Things? 14

Before wrapping up the big talk, Rubin touched on some of the things he finds to be too cumbersome in the IoT (Internet of Things) space. For instance, going to bed at night and plugging in five devices isn’t a good experience for the consumer. “As it scales, your door lock, security system, toaster oven, you have to be really careful and thoughtful about how much tech you adopt. I think one of the dangers is one company providing all the tech in your home. The real question is how to do you create interoperability without making the consumer frustrated.”

What are your thoughts on the future of mobile devices? Will they diminish in importance, or will they remain prevalent in our lives through the adoption of artificially intelligent machines? Speak up in the comment section!

9
Oct

Apple Claims TSMC vs Samsung A9 Chip Variants Result in Only 2-3% Difference in ‘Real World’ Battery Life


Over the past several days, a slew of battery tests on the iPhone 6s and the iPhone 6s Plus have revealed some performance differences between models that have an A9 chip manufactured by TSMC and those with an A9 chip created by Samsung. While various benchmarking and real world usage tests have shown differences of 6 percent to 22 percent, in favor of TSMC chips, Apple says that its own testing has shown battery life variations of only two to three percent.

a9chipsiphone6s
In a statement given to TechCrunch, Apple says that it has done internal testing and gathered customer data to determine the performance difference between the two chips in the iPhones.

With the Apple-designed A9 chip in your iPhone 6s or iPhone 6s Plus, you are getting the most advanced smartphone chip in the world. Every chip we ship meets Apple’s highest standards for providing incredible performance and deliver great battery life, regardless of iPhone 6s capacity, color, or model.

Certain manufactured lab tests which run the processors with a continuous heavy workload until the battery depletes are not representative of real-world usage, since they spend an unrealistic amount of time at the highest CPU performance state. It’s a misleading way to measure real-world battery life. Our testing and customer data show the actual battery life of the iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus, even taking into account variable component differences, vary within just 2-3% of each other.

Apple says that early battery benchmark tests conducted by customers, such as those we shared yesterday, are not reflective of real world usage conditions. The two to three percent difference that Apple has seen in data gathered from customers is “well within its manufacturing tolerances” and is a level of variation that could be seen between two devices with the same chip.

Apple’s statement on real world usage reflects what recent YouTube tests have revealed. Side-by-side battery tests comparing a TSMC iPhone and a Samsung iPhone did not show differences as dramatic as benchmark tests have shown, but those videos are also not quite indicative of real world usage results. On the MacRumors forums, opinions on battery life have been highly mixed. While some users with Samsung chips have reported poor battery life, others have not reported issues.


9
Oct

Apple Pay Coming to Starbucks, KFC, and Chili’s in 2016


Popular coffee chain Starbucks will begin accepting Apple Pay by the end of the year, says Apple Pay vice president Jennifer Bailey, who spoke today at Re/code‘s Code Mobile Conference in Half Moon Bay, California.

Starbucks plans to team up with Apple to launch an Apple Pay pilot program in select stores this year before rolling Apple Pay out to approximately 7,500 company-owned Starbucks locations in early 2016. The Apple Pay payments service will be connected to Starbucks’ own loyalty program, but it is not clear if Starbucks customers who make purchases with Apple Pay will be able to earn Starbucks rewards.

jenniferbaileycodemobile
At the current time, Starbucks uses its own barcode-based in-app mobile payments system for coffee and snack purchases made within its retail stores. The Starbucks iOS app does support Apple Pay, but only for reloading Starbucks cards. Given the popularity of Starbucks, Apple Pay availability at the chain could be a major boon for Apple.

In addition to Starbucks, Apple Pay will also be available in KFC fast food locations and Chili’s sit-down restaurants starting next year. In Chili’s, customers will be able to pay for their food directly at their tables using Apple Pay.

On stage, Bailey said Apple was “fully committed to NFC,” calling it the “best technology out there” for mobile payments. She also said Apple wants to bring Apple Pay to as many countries as possible in the future, expanding beyond the United Kingdom and the United States.