‘WarGames’ reboot will let you choose your own adventure
It’s been more than 30 years since Matthew Broderick, Ally Sheedy and a WOPR supercomputer named Joshua came close to triggering World War III in the hacker movie WarGames. The phrase “Shall we play a game?” still resonates with people today, but it may soon find a new audience after MGM, which owns the rights to the cult film, announced it’s getting a modern reboot. The studio has teamed up with interactive video company Interlude to create an “original interactive short drama,” turning WarGames into a Choose Your Own Adventure (CYOA) video with brand new characters and storyline.
In this modern take on the original, MGM and Interlude say they’ll fuse “the narrative of a compelling movie with the responsiveness of a great game.” Viewers will get to choose the outcome of certain scenes and affect the story as it progresses. If you’ve played TellTale’s episodic The Walking Dead games, then you’ll have some idea of what to expect.
If WarGames was a little before your time, let us bring you up to speed. The original movie was set during the Cold War and followed a young computer gamer (Matthew Broderick) who mistakenly hacks into the WOPR (War Operation Plan Response) supercomputer. Broderick thinks he’s playing a game with the computer, which is designed to calculate possible outcomes of nuclear war, and activates a simulation that almost triggers the real thing. It earned three Academy Award nominations.
There’s no word on how the new WarGames short will be packaged, but we do know that it’s set to land in early 2016. MGM and Interlude are already working on a story that will offer a different experience each time it is watched. If it proves successful, then who knows, we might get a new WarGames movie as well.
Via: Variety
Source: Interlude
Bell Canada gets slapped for fake App Store reviews
Bell Canada has been handed down a $1.25 million CAD ($970,719) fine by Canada’s competition bureau after its employees posted fake reviews of Bell apps. According to the regulator, the carrier “encouraged” staff members to post glowing testimonials of the MyBell Mobile and Virgin My Account apps on the App Store and Google Play. Unfortunately, these overenthusiastic write-ups neglected to mention that they were written by people on Bell’s dollar. Oops.
The dodgy behavior was initially exposed by Scott Stratten, who was already well aware of the apps’ poor standing on iTunes. Suddenly, however, the rating skyrocketed thanks to a series of five-star reviews, and Stratten smelled a rat. After some digging on LinkedIn, he uncovered that the most praiseworthy mentions were all directors, marketing managers and other people paid by Bell Canada. Oooops.
The company admitted that certain employees had been encouraged to post the ratings, but as soon as bosses were made aware, they ended the practice. As part of the settlement, the firm has pledged to tighten up its compliance program, making sure every employee knows to hit no whenever they’re asked to review the app. The firm is also being forced to sponsor a workshop to “enhance Canadians trust in the digital economy,” which will probably open with a seminar on how not to get caught gaming your own app.
Via: 9to5Mac
Volvo’s first fully electric car will arrive in 2019
Volvo’s been bullish about self-driving vehicles, but it’s much more coy when it comes to electric cars. The company’s latest XC90 has a hybrid edition, and there’s an existing V60 plug-in, but nothing fully electric. Finally, the Swedish auto-maker is ready to go all in, confirming an all-electric vehicle will go on sale in 2019, plus plans to offer hybrid versions of every car in its range, alongside a new “series 40” range of smaller electrified cars. That’s still quite a wait for the full EV, and the hybrids might not show up until 2017, but as the Wall Street Journal suggests, Volvo might have been spurred on to make the announcement by the recent VW scandal around diesel engines.
There aren’t many details about what the planned all-electric Volvo would look like, but reports suggest a saloon, similar in size to the S60, with a range of over 300 miles — putting it up against Tesla’s 2016 Model 3. However it turns out, Volvo’s chief executive, Hakan Samuelsson, seems confident people are ready for more than a little spark in their Scandinavian wagons, predicting 10-percent of Volvo sales will come from “electrified” version over the next 24 months.
Via: Autoexpress, WSJ
Source: Volvo
Pandora gives its iOS app the CarPlay treatment
As the number of CarPlay-compatible vehicles continues to grow, it’s about time a few extra iOS apps made the jump to the dashboard. The latest to join Apple’s in-car operating system is Pandora, which — despite only mentioning some bug fixes in its release notes — has quietly added support in its latest app update. The addition was spotted by 9to5Mac and, as you might expect, allows drivers to access their preferred music stations without touching their iPhone. Once you’re happily streaming some tunes, you can also head back to the Now Playing screen and use the action menu to give individual tracks a thumbs up or thumbs down. Alongside Spotify, Rdio and iHeartRadio, there are plenty of ways now to get your music fix through CarPlay — handy if you’re itching to ditch Apple Music.
[Image Credit: 9to5Mac]
Via: 9to5Mac
Source: Pandora (iOS)
Deal: score a VoCore mini Linux computer and a Linux learner bundle
It’s true that Linux is not the easiest platform to operate, but once you get the hang of it a whole world of opportunities opens up right in front of your techie eyes! We know it can be a bit intimidating to get started in the complex and fascinating world of Linux, so we have a couple awesome deals to get you into this adventure without spending significant amounts of cash.
The AA Deals Store currently has a couple hot offers that will rock your socks off. These are the VoCore mini Linux computer and a complete bundle of courses that will teach you the ins and outs of the platform.
VoCore: Mini Linux Computer
This tiny computer is among the cheapest, tiniest and most useful Linux boards you can find. One can’t quite use it as a full-on computer, but be sure it will be great for putting together a router, building a motherboard, inventing a new gadget, powering smart devices or running your smart home.
It comes fully equipped with OpenWRT Linux, an on-board WiFi adapter, Ethernet, a USB port, 32 MB of RAM, 8 MB of flash storage and a Ralink/Mediatek 360 MHz RT5350 MIPS SoC. All for only $39! Go get it.
Buy the VoCore mini Linux computer for $39!

Linux Learner Bundle
Now that you have invested into the awesome world of Linux, it’s time to really get the hang of the open OS. The Linux Learner Bundle offers a set of 5 classes to teach you everything there is to know about Linux. The cheapest of the courses is said to be worth around $49, while the most expensive is valued at around $200.
You don’t have to deal with those crazy prices when purchasing them from the AA Deals Store, though. The entire bundle is available for only $49. Here are the included courses.
- Learn Linux in 5 days
- Learning Ubuntu Linux Server
- Learn to run Linux servers from scratch
- Learn to run Linux servers (part 2)
- Pentester certification course
Buy the Linux Learner Bundle for only $49!

Wrapping up
So there you have it, guys. These two deals are definitely among the cheapest ways to get started with Linux and unlocking the full capacity of this platform. Go sign up! You won’t regret it.
OPPO R7 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy A8

The difference between mid-range and high-end smartphones is decreasing in relevancy, as seemingly mid-tier smartphones are getting now getting higher-end specifications, better hardware, improved software and lower prices. So, where do we draw the line between these two tiers?
Today we’re taking a look at two smartphones that are stuck in the middle of the mid-range and high-end device markets – the OPPO R7 Plus and the Samsung Galaxy A8. How do these smartphones compare to one another? Which one offers a better overall value to consumers? We aim to answer that question, and more, in this in-depth comparison between the OPPO R7 Plus and the Samsung Galaxy A8.
Pre-order the OPPO R7 Plus from OppoStyle
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;
Design

It’s pretty clear that both the OPPO R7 Plus and Samsung Galaxy A8 are great looking smartphones. They both feature an all-metal design with chamfered edges that extend along the entire perimeter of each device. This doesn’t mean the two phones don’t share their differences, though. The OPPO R7 Plus is the bigger of the two, sporting a 6.0-inch display and measuring 7.8mm thick. Handling it with one hand can be a tad difficult if you’re not used to large smartphones, but for those who are, you shouldn’t have a problem in this area.
On the other hand, the Galaxy A8 is a bit easier to hold, thanks to its slightly smaller 5.7-inch display and 5.9mm thickness. It’s Samsung’s thinnest phone to date, and despite its metal construction, it only weighs 151 grams, compared to the R7 Plus’ 192 grams.
Buttons on each phone are in their normal, easy-to-reach placements. Each device sports a power/standby button on the right side, and volume keys on the left. The R7 Plus’ 3.5mm headphone jack can be found on the top of the device, with the A8’s found at the bottom. Both devices also have a MicroUSB port at the bottom for charging and data transfer purposes, which is par for the course with most of today’s smartphones.
Don’t miss: OPPO R7 Plus review | Samsung Galaxy A8 review

As for the Galaxy A8, it sports a single speaker next to the camera module on the back, which doesn’t really provide a great sound when listening to music or watching videos. The R7 Plus also sports a rear-facing speaker, but this one is towards the bottom of the device and provides much better sound quality.
In typical Samsung fashion, the Galaxy A8 has a physical home button flanked by capacitive recent apps and back keys, while OPPO chose to go with on-screen buttons with the R7 Plus. The R7 Plus has a rear-mounted fingerprint scanner below the camera module, and Samsung’s fingerprint scanner is integrated into the home button.
Battery

The Galaxy A8, measuring just 5.9mm thin, has room for a non-removable 3050mAh battery. In our time with the device the A8 gave us some really impressive battery statistics, giving us around 4 hours of screen-on time during most days. It has impressive standby time, too, only losing around 2 or 3% battery when on standby overnight.
The R7 Plus has room for a much larger battery – 4100mAh to be exact. Even when streaming video and playing games, the R7 Plus consistently provided us with upwards of 5 hours of screen-on time. It’s difficult to kill this device’s battery in one day. And if you happen to succeed at that, you can take advantage of OPPO’s VOOC fast charging capabilities.
Camera

For many, the camera is among the most important factors in a smartphone, and neither of these devices skimp in this area. The R7 Plus features a 13MP main shooter with an f/2.2 aperture and Schneider-Kreuznach optics, as well as laser auto-focus and an LED flash. The front-facer on the R7 Plus comes in at 8MP, which should be great for video calls and selfies.
Images in standard, well-lit conditions come out very clear most of the time, with plenty of detail. Color accuracy is outstanding, dynamic range is decent and shooting speeds are quite snappy. Shutter speed slows down when moving to poorly-lit conditions, but ultimately the results are better than average. This is mostly because of OPPO’s RGBW sensor, which adds a white pixel to to the usual RGB set-up. This is said to increase light sensitivity by 32% and reduce noise by 78%.
The Galaxy A8 features a 16MP rear-facing camera with an f/1.9 aperture, just like what is seen with the Galaxy S6. The sensor uses ISOCELL technology, but there is no optical image stabilization available with the Galaxy A8. The camera can be launched with a double tap of the home button, which is a really nice feature to have. The front-facing camera is a 5MP unit with a wide angle lens that allows for some decent looking selfies, though we found that the default beauty mode settings are a little too aggressive.
Most of the images taken with the A8 are pretty clear and show plenty of detail, especially in above-average lighting conditions. The images are colorful and saturated as you would expect from any other Samsung camera, making for some very crisp and vibrant images. Even without OIS, the A8’s camera performs pretty well in low light conditions. Images still exhibit a nice amount of color and sharpness, and there’s not a whole lot of noise reduction going on in post-production.
Both of the software interfaces are simple and easy to use, which makes taking quick shots easy.
OPPO R7 Plus camera samples
#gallery-1
margin: auto;
#gallery-1 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 20%;
#gallery-1 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-1 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Samsung Galaxy A8 camera samples
#gallery-2
margin: auto;
#gallery-2 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 20%;
#gallery-2 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-2 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Display and hardware

The OPPO R7 Plus and Galaxy A8 are actually pretty similar on the display front. The R7 Plus sports a 6.0-inch Super AMOLED panel with 1920 x 1080 resolution and a pixel density of 367ppi, while the A8 has a slightly smaller 5.7-inch Super AMOLED panel with 1920 x 1080 resolution and a pixel density of 386ppi. Thanks to the Super AMOLED panels on both phones, you can expect deep blacks and vibrant colors. Viewing angles are quite good on both, and we haven’t had any problems with these devices in direct sunlight, either.
The downsides to both of these displays, though, is that at 5.7-6 inches, you can start noticing some pixels because of their 1080p resolution. This is par for the course when it comes to mid-range phones, though, so this isn’t anything too out of the ordinary.
If display size is something that’s very important to you, we’d recommend the OPPO R7 Plus if you’re looking for the best multimedia experience between the two. The display is bigger and the bezels are quite small, meaning you’ll have a better time watching YouTube videos or playing games. In terms of screen size, the Galaxy A8 is a bit easier to handle, so keep that in mind before you make your decision, as well.

The R7 Plus comes with 32GB of on-board storage. There’s no 64 or 128GB variant to choose from, but OPPO makes up for this by adding support for a microSD card up to 128GB in size. In contrast, the Galaxy A8 comes in both 16 and 32GB flavors and also supports microSD expansion up to 128GB.
Moving to the back, the R7 Plus and A8 both sport a rear-facing speaker. In terms of sound quality, neither are anything to write home about. The R7 Plus’ speaker is easy to muffle with your hand and the A8’s speaker isn’t all that powerful. If we had to choose one, though, it’d be the R7 Plus’ speaker. It’s louder and provides better sound quality, which we’d prefer over the A8’s less powerful unit.
Below the camera module on the back of the R7 Plus sits a fingerprint scanner, which is conveniently-placed and super reliable. It’s just as fast as the unit that you’d find on the Galaxy S6 or even the iPhone. The Galaxy A8 also has a fingerprint reader in its home button, which, at no surprise to us, works just as well as other Samsung devices. This means that it all comes down to placement, and while they both have their positives and negatives, the R7 Plus’ rear-mounted scanner just suits our needs a bit better.
Performance

The internals of these two devices are actually quite similar. They both feature octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 processors, which also comes along with an Adreno 405 GPU. No, these aren’t top-of-the-line processors, but they’re both very capable chipsets that should give you little to no problems throughout your daily use. It should be noted that the R7 Plus comes with 3GB of RAM compared to the A8’s 2GB, which could potentially pose a problem for the Samsung device when it comes to software lag.
OPPO really optimized it’s custom Color OS software overlay with the release of the R7 Plus, making the device fly through everyday tasks. We experienced little to no lag in the software or overheating issues, which is a plus. The Galaxy A8 performed quite well in our full review, but not great. We experienced some lag in the software, especially when scrolling through Flipboard home screen. Overall, performance is good and on par with other similarly-spec’d smartphones.
If we had to choose one, though, it’d be the R7 Plus. Both the R7 Plus and A8 sport heavy software skins, and the fact of the matter is that the R7 Plus just handles itself better.
Software

Both devices run a heavily customized version of Android 5.1.1 Lollipop. For starters, the R7 Plus features a much-improved version of OPPO’s Color OS. It doesn’t feature an application drawer, so you’ll need to rely heavily on folders to organize your home screens, which some users might find to be too cumbersome or cluttered. If you can get past that, though, Color OS is pretty sleek.
You can double tap to wake the R7 Plus, and it even supports a handful of gestures that can be used to perform specific actions, such as drawing an “O” in the screen to launch the camera. It might seem a tad gimmicky for some, but we think they can be quite useful at times.
The Galaxy A8 runs Samsung’s typical TouchWiz user interface. This is a much leaner version of TouchWiz than we saw on the first few Galaxy devices, which means there are much fewer unnecessary pre-installed apps this time around. With that said, many of Samsung’s popular features are present on the device, such as multi-window and smart gestures. There’s also a new theming engine present on the A8 that was first introduced on the S6. This lets you easily customize and change the look of your phone’s UI if you’re not a big fan of the blue and green TouchWiz color scheme.
All in all, we’re calling the software portion of this comparison a draw. Both OPPO and Samsung have decided to include some very useful features in these devices, and honestly, it’s pretty difficult to pick between the two.
Specifications
| OPPO R7 Plus | Samsung Galaxy A8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.0-inch Super AMOLED display, 1920 x 1080 resolution, 367ppi | 5.7-inch Super AMOLED display, 1920 x 1080 resolution, 386ppi |
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 |
| GPU | Adreno 405 | Adreno 405 |
| RAM | 3GB | 2GB |
| Storage | 32GB on-board microSD expansion up to 128GB |
16/32GB on-board microSD expansion up to 128GB |
| Connectivity | 4G/LTE/HSPA | 4G/LTE/HSPA |
| Camera | 13MP rear-facing camera with laser autofocus 8MP front-facing camera |
16MP rear-facing camera 5MP front-facing camera |
| Software | Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 5.1 Lollipop |
| Battery | 4100mAh non-removable |
3050mAh non-removable |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes | Yes |
| Dimensions | 158 x 82 x 7.8mm 192g |
158 x 76.8 x 5.9mm 151g |
Gallery
#gallery-3
margin: auto;
#gallery-3 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;
#gallery-3 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;
#gallery-3 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;
/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Pricing and final thoughts
Here’s where the comparison gets interesting. The OPPO R7 Plus is available now for pre-order from OppoStyle for $499. The Samsung Galaxy A8 is available for purchase in select regions such as China, South Korea and India for $499 as well. If you want an A8 here in the U.S., though, you’re going to have to purchase one for full price from sites like eBay or Amazon, which could get pretty pricey.
The fact of the matter is, both of these smartphones bring a lot to the table, so it really depends on the market in which you’re currently residing. If you can get your hands on a Galaxy A8 for an affordable price point, that’s not a bad idea. But in most other cases, we’d say go for the OPPO R7 Plus.
Huawei Watch review: Does function match design?
Huawei has been making quite the statement in 2015. Other than being one of Google’s partners for the Nexus 6P, Huawei has been releasing a slew of high-quality products that have been turning heads everywhere. Slowly, but surely they have been making a name for themselves, and it’s obviously caught the attention of the big boys in California.
In addition to the various phones that Huawei has introduced, they also entered the Android Wear smartwatch race. The Huawei Watch was introduced at Mobile World Congress in February of 2015, and then officially released just last month. When Huawei showed off their Android Wear smartwatch, there were lots of ooh’s and ah’s due to the beautiful design.
Design
Sporting a stainless steel casing, the Huawei Watch features a traditional round-face, with a simple button on the upper right-hand side of the watch. As someone who’s owned a Moto 360, I was interested in seeing a smartwatch take advantage of ALL the screen real-estate, without worrying about having a flat tire, that cuts off parts of the watch faces. Luckily, the Huawei Watch does not have this chin, but there’s also a glaring hole that the Huawei Watch fails to fill.
Part of why the Moto 360 has that hideous flat tire on the face, is to house all the sensors, including the ambient light sensor. Well, the Huawei Watch is without this light sensor, meaning that this smartwatch stays at the same brightness all the time. This can be frustrating, and you would think that the lack of an ambient light sensor would take a toll on the battery life, but you might be surprised.
The somewhat larger size of the Huawei Watch helps to protect your new smartwatch from getting scratched or anything, and the glass covering the watch face does the same. Made out of sapphire crystal, the Huaweai Watch provides another first for Android Wear devices, making it the first of its kind with this type of protection for your watch face. What makes sapphire crystal different from the rest, is that it’s harder than Corning’s Gorilla Glass. This will allow for you accidentally bump into something and have a little more peace of mind about whether you just cracked the face of your favorite smartwatch.
Specs
Below the hood, the Huawei Watch has a 1.4-inch display with, 400×400 resolution at a rate of 286 pixels per inch. This is the highest resolution of any Android Wear device today. Powering that beautiful, high resolution display is a 1.2GHz quad-core Snapdragon 400 processor, 4GB of storage, 512MB of RAM and a 300mAh battery. Additionally, the Huawei Watch has a few other features that help it stand apart from the crowd.
The built-in Wi-Fi will come in handy if you’re using the Huawei Watch and your Bluetooth paired device isn’t near you. That way you will still be able to get your notifications even if you’re outside of the range of the Bluetooth. With an IP67 rating, your watch will be able to withstand you taking a shower with it on, and the occasional rain-drops, but don’t play on taking this on a swim with you. The Huawei Watch also has a heart-rate monitor on the bottom of the watch, and while it doesn’t continuously monitor your heart-rate, the added functionality is definitely a plus.
Huawei didn’t really design their watch to be a “sporty” device, instead focusing more on fashion with this one. In that regard, there isn’t GPS built-in, so you won’t be able to track exactly where you go. However, you will be able to keep track of your steps, distance, and calories burned with the Huawei Watch.
These are some pretty impressive specs, compared to other Android Wear devices that have been released in 2015. The Huawei Watch isn’t without it’s flaws, unfortunately. The casing, while beautiful and professional looking, is a bit thick and heavy. For someone with large wrists like myself, and one who usually wears a G-Shock, this isn’t really a problem at all. But we can imagine those with normal-sized wrists, running into some issues with the heft of the Huawei Watch.
Where’s the Qi?
Another downside to the design of the Huawei Watch would have to be the charging capabilities. As stated above, I am coming from the first-gen Moto 360 with its wireless Qi-charging. When the Huawei Watch was first announced, I was a little more than disappointed with the announcement regarding the lack of Qi-charging. Huawei opted for the pogo-pin style charging, which automatically limits the ways you will be able to charge the Watch. Maybe this has something to do with the already thick casing of the watch, but it’s an interesting omission nonetheless.
In the packaging, you’ll receive a charging cable with the pogo-plug pad for the Huawei Watch to be charged. I must admit, this was the most frustrating part of the review. There were multiple times, where I laid the Huawei Watch on the charging pad, thinking that it was charging because of the magnet in the charger, only to find out that the Watch was dead the next morning. In order to make sure I had a good contact between the Watch and the charging pad, I would pick up both the charger and the watch, and made sure that the pins were lined up correctly.
This is an area that could see some improvement from the folks at Huawei, but it’s not the end of the world either. Hopefully, since more of the world is moving towards wireless charging, Huawei will follow suit if they end up releasing an updated version in the future.
Battery Life
As for the battery life, I’ve taken a look at a few of the other Huawei Watch reviews, just to get a feel for what other folks have been getting and I must say that I must have the golden egg. Other reviews state that they can’t get through an entire day, let alone two, without having to recharge. This was not the case in my experience with the Huawei Watch.
After the first week, when the updates were installed, and the internal dust settled, I was getting great battery life. My work day starts at 6AM but I have to leave my apartment at about 5AM or so. I was able to get through the entire day, with heavy usage, and still have about 40% or so left over when I got back to my apartment around 4 or 5PM. With that battery life, there were times that I would be able to use the Huawei Watch up until I got home the next day.
Swap those bands
Being able to change out the various bands is always a fun experiment, regardless of whatever watch you get. The Huawei Watch supports both 18mm and 21mm straps that can be easily swapped out at your discretion. There is a quick release tab on the ends of the band that allow for replacing the bands without any tools. No longer do you have to worry about fumbling around with swapping the bands out.
The final “gripe” I have with the design, isn’t necessarily for me, but I can see it being problematic for others. Huawei decided to not add an NFC chip within the Huawei Watch. While the casing is already thick, I can imagine there would be room somewhere to add this feature. With contactless payments, like Android Pay and Samsung Pay, becoming more and more popular, the lack of NFC is a bit of a head-scratcher. We’ll have to see if Huawei hits the mark on the next rendition.
Usage and Software
Throughout my testing of the Huawei Watch, I paired the Watch with three different devices; OnePlus 2, Samsung Galaxy Note5, and the iPhone 6s. At the core, the software is the same that can be found on every other Android Wear device. However, the Huawei Watch comes preloaded with a boatload of watch faces, 40 to be exact. And while the face itself is fairly large, the Google Now cards that would pop up, took up too much of th screen.
There were times of frustration, where I would get annoyed with the size of the cards, and going on a swiping frenzy to get rid of the notifications. If there was a different way to view the notifications or a way to change the size of the Google Now cards, that would be pretty awesome. But that’s not the fault of the Huawei Watch, or any other Android Wear device for that matter.
Something worth taking note of, is related to the charging notification you get when plugging in your new Huawei Watch. The icon is extremely tiny, and there are times where you can’t even see whether it’s charging or not. That should be something that can be changed on Huawei’s side, and make it easier for us to tell whether your Watch is charging or not.
Empty those wallets
If you want to get this bad boy, be prepared to empty your wallets out. There are six different options you can get from either Huawei or Amazon, and the pricing ranges from $349 to $449. Here are the listed options below:
- Huawei Watch with Black Suture Leather Strap – $349.99
- Huawei Watch with Stainless Steel Mesh Band – $399.99
- Huawei Watch with Stainless Steel Link Band – $399.99
- Huawei Watch Black with Black Stainless Steel Link Band – $449.99
- Huawei Watch Rose Gold with Alligator Brown Leather Strap – $699.99
- Huawei Watch Rose Gold with Rose Gold Stainless Steel Link Band – $799.99
As I stated, you can head over to either Huawei or Amazon and grab the Huawei Watch. Currently, all the options are in stock, except for the option with the Stainless Steel Link Band. But if you already have an 18mm or 21mm band, you’ll be good with grabbing one of the other options and using your own. Plus, you’ll be able to save a few bucks that way.
Regardless of its flaws, the Huawei Watch is an absolutely gorgeous device. We recognize where the Huawei Watch can be troublesome for some (i.e. small wrists), but overall, the Huawei Watch is one of the best Android Wear devices you can get today.
Have you used the Huawei Watch already? What were your impressions on it, and where it stands amongst the ranks of other Android Wear devices? Drop us a line below and let us know.
The post Huawei Watch review: Does function match design? appeared first on AndroidGuys.
The new OnePlus giveaway may be its worst yet

Do you own one of Samsung’s 2015 flagship phones? Are you itching to get rid of it for a phone that costs about half of the price you paid? Our saviors OnePlus are here to rescue you from those curved edges and styluses.
OnePlus is hosting a contest, and if you’re one of 50 lucky winners, you can trade in your $650+ Samsung Galaxy S6, S6 Edge, S6 Edge+ or Note 5 for the hard to purchase, $389 “flagship killer”. Never mind the fact that you could sell your phone for more than the OnePlus 2 costs new. Never mind that Swappa has 53 listings for OnePlus 2’s for as low as $395, with recent sales going as low as $360.
This, again, is another ridiculous giveaway only there to drum up free press for OnePlus. And yes, I realize the irony that we’re writing about it. The point of this article today is tell you to not buy a OnePlus 2, even if you are “lucky” enough to get an invite.
“The OnePlus 2 was created by tech lovers, for tech lovers. We keep our devices free from gimmicks and bloatware. We explore what’s fresh and exciting, as opposed to recycling the same technology as incredible breakthroughs time and time again. That’s why we are giving those who may have settled for The Next Big Thing an interesting opportunity.“
OnePlus has demonstrated time and time again that they’re unprofessional, arrogant and not very good at what they’re doing. From the disastrous, sexist “Ladies First” contest to blacklisting bloggers because an editorial exposed them as frauds, to being unable to deliver on promised launch dates. OnePlus is bad and they should feel bad.
This doesn’t even take into account that the OnePlus 2 isn’t the “2016 Flagship Killer” that they promise. The lack of NFC has been well documented, and with the rise of convenient mobile payments on the rise, it is actually a big deal. This is the first item on a very long list of why OnePlus missed the mark.
To be honest, I did get an invite and I did buy a OnePlus 2. And I returned it. The phone never made it out of the packaging before I sent it back because I’m uncomfortable giving this company my money and you should be too.
OnePlus states on their giveaway page that they’re going to be giving away the collected phones to HopePhones. If you’d like to support HopePhones, who connect medical technology to those in need I suggest you donate directly to the company instead.
The post The new OnePlus giveaway may be its worst yet appeared first on AndroidGuys.
LG first to push Android Marshmallow to its own flagship
LG’s gearing up to roll out Android Marshmallow to its devices, and you can install it as soon as next week… if you own a G4 handset and live in Poland. The South Korean manufacturer will release the latest Android version in the European country first, but it promises that America, Asia and the rest of Europe will follow. Unfortunately, the company doesn’t have exact dates for those markets yet. Local carriers will likely announce the upgrade when it becomes available, though; in the US, T-Mobile already confirmed that the G3 and the G4 will get Marshmallow in the future.
LG claims the G4 is the first in the world to get Marshmallow besides Google’s own Nexus devices. According to its VP of marketing communications, Chris Yie, it’s because the company worked closely with Google to make it happen.
By working closely with Google, LG has been able to bring Android 6.0 to the G4 ahead of any of our competitors. While speed alone isn’t an indicator of great service, it does go a long way toward giving consumers the confidence that LG is committed to its existing customers first.
Source: LG
Researchers are helping robots avoid expensive face plants
Why are robot tumbles comedy gold? Unlike humans, they make no effort to protect themselves, resulting in flailing, extra hard falls (bottom). But the high-g impacts are hell on the extremely expensive, often one-of-a-kind machines, so researchers from Georgia tech developed algorithms to give them some sense of self-preservation. They made them copy exactly what we do instinctively — stick out a limb to break the fall. “(That way), every time you make contact with the ground, some of the energy is dissipated,” said Georgia Tech professor Karen Liu.
That algorithm helps robots to quickly contort their bodies to create the maximum number of contact points to spread the force of the fall. With tests on a small robot, the algorithm helped the robots land with considerably less force — 5.5 g versus 8.04 g in the head area with a moderate push, for example. During a hard push, the robot was able to stick out a leg for a more graceful summersault (below).
Right now, robots like Big Dog and Atlas from Google-owned Boston Dynamics go limp when they detect a fall. However, as the robots become more advanced, they’ll need better loss-of-balance tech to not just protect the robots, but the humans they could fall onto. After all, Boston Dynamic’s Atlas stands 6 feet tall and 330 pounds, so it could cause considerable mayhem during a badly-timed spill.
Source: Technology Review




















































