Perch home monitoring system launches
If you are interested in setting up a connected smart home with the ability to monitor activity from afar, but worry you may select a solution that eventually goes out of favor, Perch may be the answer you are looking for. Perch is a home monitoring service that utilizes existing devices, like laptops, tablets, webcams and smartphones, to build an Internet of Things network to help users keep tabs on their household. Perch CEO Andrew Cohen says, “The average family has six internet connected devices. So we built an open solution that lets you get started with the hardware you already have.”
Perch is currently in public beta right now and can be installed on Android devices, laptops and PCs. Perch says in the coming months they will be adding support for iOS, for smart TVs, and for traditional security camera systems. Perch built their systems to be able to provide real-time video monitoring, including video conferencing, without the traditional home monitoring lag. The system will also be capable of connecting to IoT smart devices like lighting systems so users can control them when away.
Below you can check out an introduction video the Perch team put together showing how their system will work. Hit the source link below that or read the full press release about Perch, which came out of the Samsung Accelerator incubator.
Click here to view the embedded video.
Perch Makes the Internet of Things More Accessible With Free Home Monitoring Service
New System Delivers Real-Time Video and Home Controls
NEW YORK, NY–(Marketwired – Oct 14, 2015) – Perch, a new service designed to be the easiest way to get started in home monitoring, released its public beta today.
Perch takes devices you already own — laptops, tablets, webcams, and phones — and turns them into a simple home monitoring service. Users can get started in a few minutes by downloading an app or visiting the Perch website.
“The average family has six internet connected devices,” said Andrew Cohen, Perch CEO. “So we built an open solution that lets you get started with the hardware you already have.”
Perch, which was developed at the Samsung Accelerator, has launched its new service in an open beta, available initially for laptops, Android devices, tablets and PCs. In the coming months, the company plans to deliver support for iOS as well as integration with smart TVs and traditional security cameras.
While it’s free and accessible, Perch also delivers advanced video capabilities. Real-time video technology eliminates the frustrating 5-10 second lag time of other monitoring systems. Embedded video chats offer an immediate way to connect with kids and loved ones, and a cloud-based DVR allows users to review recorded video and capture memorable moments.
Perch also has special features for users who own smart home systems. Perch allows users to control devices in the home directly from an intuitive, real-time video interface. It’s the only system where users can click on a light and immediately see it turn on or off.
“Perch has taken a new approach to home monitoring, both by making it incredibly easy to get started and by developing cutting-edge technologies,” said Emily Becher, Vice President, Samsung Accelerator. “That’s exactly what we’re looking to support out of the Accelerator — innovative software, and technology that engages users.”
Product Specifications and Availability
Perch is available at http://getperch.com. Perch requires wifi and works with almost any laptop or standard USB webcam, and with any devices running Android 4.1 or higher, including tablets, phones and digital cameras.For more details:
- Product video: https://getperch.com/2015/10/09/perch-explainer/
- Introducing Perch blog post (including screen shots)https://getperch.com/2015/10/14/introducing-perch
About Perch
Perch is an Internet of Things startup working out of the Samsung Accelerator, part of the Samsung Global Innovation Center. Perch’s goal is to be the easiest way to get started in home monitoring. Perch is a simple and intuitive solution powered by advanced technology, including real-time video and smart home controls.About Samsung Global Innovation Center
The Samsung Global Innovation Center brings software and services innovation to Samsung Electronics by working with startups and entrepreneurs through investments, acquisitions, partnerships and the Samsung Accelerator. The GIC’s deep integration with Samsung consumer electronics and mobile business units provide entrepreneurs and startups with unparalleled access to Samsung resources, decision-makers, product roadmap, and the world’s largest platform for distribution. Opened in 2013, the GIC operates across offices in Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Francisco, New York, and Suwon, South Korea.
source: Perch
Come comment on this article: Perch home monitoring system launches
Apple TV 4 and iPad Pro Pre-Orders Begin at Select Authorized Resellers in Europe
Just weeks before the Apple TV 4 is expected to be released worldwide, select Apple Authorized Resellers in Europe have begun accepting pre-orders for the new set-top box. The Apple TV 4 is officially slated to launch in late October, but the majority of orders are unlikely to be fulfilled until November.
Electronics retailer Elgiganten, equivalent to Best Buy in the Nordic Region, is accepting Apple TV 4 pre-orders in Denmark and Norway with expected delivery in November. The 32GB and 64GB models are listed for 1,399 and 1,849 Danish kroner and 1,749 and 2,299 Norwegian kroner respectively.
German electronics retailer Cyberport has also listed the Apple TV 4 and iPad Pro for pre-order on its website. The authorized reseller lists the 32GB and 64GB Apple TV 4 for €179 and €239 respectively, which could be indicative of broader European pricing, although prices in other countries will likely vary depending on local taxes.
iPad Pro prices range from €899 to €1,229, compared to between $799 and $1,079 in the United States.
Cyberport advertises that the Apple TV 4 will be available from November 5, and lists the iPad Pro as not yet available. Apple has not provided a specific release date for either product beyond late October for the Apple TV 4 and November for the iPad Pro.
(Thanks, Rasmus and Maxime!)
Amazon’s 4K Fire TV is more capable, but still unnecessary
So the Fire Phone was a flop — so much so that it reportedly pushed Amazon out of the phone business entirely. But the Fire TV ($100) is still around, and judging from what we’ve seen from this year’s entry, it’s likely here to stay. The new model looks the same as the original, but it sports some powerful new hardware and 4K support. Amazon also brought over its virtual assistant Alexa from the Echo speaker, just in time to do battle with Siri on the new Apple TV. As far as upgrades go, the new Fire TV is a fairly minor leap from last year, but it shows Amazon still wants to be competitive in the set-top box arena. Unfortunately, it still hasn’t proven why anyone would want to get the Fire TV over the competition. Slideshow-330232
When I say Amazon didn’t change much about the Fire TV’s design from last year, I really mean it. Side by side, it’s practically impossible to tell the difference between the two. It’s still a nondescript, square box, with (dangerously) sharp corners. Look on the back, though, and you’ll notice one difference: a slot for a microSD card that adds up to 128GB more storage, on top of the Fire TV’s 8GB internal storage. (The $140 “Gaming Edition” Fire TV comes with a 32GB microSD card.) It’s a minor, but significant, change — the original Fire TV forced you to deal with managing apps and games with only a paltry 8GB of space. (However, Amazon released an update that allowed USB storage earlier this year.) Under the hood, there are also some big changes: a new quad-core processor that Amazon claims is 75 percent faster and an improved graphics processor to go along with 2GB of RAM (the same as the original model).

Amazon also stuck with the same Fire TV remote, which is a good thing since it was one of the best elements from last year. While it’s significantly bigger than the current Apple TV remote (I haven’t yet tested the upcoming touchpad-equipped model), it curves nicely into your hand and sports a comfortable soft, plastic finish. There’s a fairly accurate directional pad and the usual playback buttons, but the remote’s most unique feature is the microphone button on top. Tap it, say what you’d like to watch and the Fire TV quickly brings up details about the program, and also points you to it in Amazon’s video library.
While it worked pretty well last year, the new Fire TV’s additional horsepower makes its voice search significantly faster. It’s far more convenient than typing individual characters into an on-screen prompt. This time around, you can also ask Amazon’s Alexa for things like the weather, your upcoming schedule and general questions. It’s not nearly as capable as it is on the Echo though: At this point, Alexa on Fire TV doesn’t control smart home devices, and it can’t even read you the news. It’ll likely improve over time, though, just like Amazon’s speaker. And speaking of the Echo, expect to have some crosstalk with the Fire TV whenever you talk to Alexa. (Echo owners already know what it’s like to suffer through Echo commercials that inadvertently activate Alexa.)

When it comes to simply “[insert your preferred streaming video service] and chilling,” the Fire TV once again proves to be a capable device. Navigating through its interface is zippier than before, thanks to the better specs, and there’s very little delay when it comes to streaming video on Amazon’s video service, Hulu Plus and Netflix. As for the addition of 4K, it added a bit of clarity to shows when I watched content on a UHD monitor, but as I’ve mentioned plenty of times, it’s not something you’ll really notice unless you have a 60-inch television or above.
On another note, I was also pleased to find that the new Fire TV actually sent Dolby Digital audio streams to my receiver properly — for some reason that never worked correctly with the original. And once again, I was impressed by the overall quality of Fire TV apps. They’re far better designed and easier to navigate than the current Apple TV (although it looks like Apple improved that significantly with the upcoming model).
Unfortunately, Amazon didn’t have its new gaming controller available for us to test, but I’ll be sure to report on that later. That accessory was one of my biggest issues with the first Fire TV, so there’s definitely room for improvement. While playing a few games with the standard Fire TV remote, I noticed they loaded a bit faster than before, and I was also able to hop back to the main menu more quickly. But, on top of the drastic need for a better controller, what Amazon really needs to make the Fire TV a gaming hit is better games, and we’re not seeing much of that yet.

It’s particularly hard to ignore the Fire TV’s role as a mere Trojan horse for Amazon’s ecosystem this time around. It’s refusing to sell the Apple TV and Chromecast over the lack of adequate Prime Video support, a pretty bold move for a company that promised to be the “everything store.” I suppose now, as Amazon delves more into consumer products of its own, it’ll be more like the “everything except what conflicts with us” store.
While the new Fire TV proves to be a capable media streamer, once again, there really isn’t a huge difference from last year’s model. Current owners definitely don’t need to upgrade. And while its nice to see Amazon add 4K support (something Roku also added to its next box, and which the new Apple TV won’t support), that alone isn’t enough to differentiate it from the more established alternatives. You can still have a pretty great Amazon video experience with the Roku 4, and have the benefit of plenty more apps to boot. The Apple TV, meanwhile, offers a much better experience for iOS users, and I wouldn’t be surprised if an Amazon shows up eventually. Just like last year, the Fire TV is a decent device that doesn’t have much of a reason to exist.
Google Play’s pending redesign gets an early tease
While an app store redesign may not be the most exciting update, there are some pending tweaks to the Google Play store app that tidy things up a bit. Thanks to Google software engineer Kirill Grouchnikov, we have an early look at a few of the changes. Aside from some aesthetic polish and scrolling animations, Google is dividing the store into two main parts: Apps & Games and Entertainment. Google Play is currently divided into six categories that appear when you first open up the app, so reducing those down to two seems to simplify matters a bit. There’s also support for languages that read right to left, based on some of the screenshots Grouchnikov uploaded to Google+. Unfortunately, there’s no indication as to when Android users will receive the update. For now, you can see how the Google Play has evolved since its early days as Android market on the other side of the break.


Via: The Verge
Source: Kirill Grouchnikov (Google+)
Dell Chromebook 13 review: Chrome OS without compromise
I’ve long wondered why it was so hard to find a nice Chromebook. Sure, the Pixel may be an exemplary laptop, but it’s near-impossible to recommend that anyone spend $1,000 on a Chrome OS device. But most cheaper Chromebooks compromise your computing experience with bad displays, uninspired hardware or internals that just can’t keep up.
But there’s change in the air. Last year, Toshiba and Samsung both released 13-inch models that both moved the bar forward, but they also each had some serious flaws. Now Dell is trying its hand with its first 13-inch Chromebook, a follow-up to the successful 11-inch version it released last year. It may be marketed toward business users, but in a lot of ways this is a Chromebook that anyone who believes in the promise of Chrome OS could love. That quality comes at a cost, though: The entry price for Dell’s Chromebook 13 is $429. Does this Chromebook justify that bigger investment? Slideshow-329326
Hardware

From the outside, the Chromebook 13 follows the demure styling found in the Dell Chromebook 11 — there’s nary a hint of color here outside of the Chrome logo on the lid. It might not be the most innovative or attractive laptop out there, but it’s functional and attractive in the same way as a navy blazer — it’ll never go out of style. The gunmetal gray magnesium alloy chassis, carbon fiber weave on the lid and shiny black Dell logo are all subtle and appropriate for the computer’s business pedigree and also appear to be highly influenced by the well-designed XPS series. It’s not something any employee (or consumer) will really be able to complain about.
That no-nonsense design extends to how the computer feels in your hands and in use. It’s a little thick (0.84 inch at its largest point) and a little heavy (3.23 pounds), but it at least feels strong and not cheaply built. Unlike most Chromebooks, there’s no flex when you’re typing or carrying the device around. It’s one of the best-designed Chrome OS laptops I’ve used, drawing a lot of influence from the Pixel — and it should at this price. It’s clear that Dell is leveraging a lot of its know-how from other notebooks in its lineup, and as such, this computer feels like a solid, time-tested design, not a first version of a new product for the company.
As far as I’m concerned, a Chromebook (or any laptop, really) has to get the keyboard, trackpad and screen right (which is why I’ve been so disappointed with the terrible 1,366 x 768 panels that populate most Chromebooks). Fortunately, the Dell succeeds on all counts here. The 13-inch, 1080p display is a standout — while Dell says it’s an IPS screen, viewing angles aren’t quite as good as you’ll see on more expensive computers. But it’s otherwise a wonderful-looking screen that finally offers up a decent-size workspace on a Chromebook. Sure, 1080p can make text a little tiny, but fortunately you can step it down to 1,536 x 840 if you need things to be larger. (Oddly enough, this panel can also be set to a higher, 2,400 x 1,350 resolution, but I wouldn’t recommend it.) Everything’s much sharper at 1080p, and the small text generally wasn’t a problem for me. I was happy to use this screen for hours every day during my testing.

The backlit keyboard isn’t as good as the one on the Pixel, but it’s far ahead of just about every other Chromebook I’ve used, with great travel and key caps that never feel like they’re going to go flying off if I type too vigorously. In fact, it’s as good as a keyboard on a laptop that costs twice as much. The trackpad is also a pleasure: It’s highly responsive and supports multitouch gestures. Again, it just felt like a component from a more expensive computer. I wish it were a bit bigger, but that’s the only knock I have.
One surprising thing about the Chromebook 13’s hardware is its robust audio output. Sure, you’re still listening to music on a laptop, but my casual testing revealed a computer that had solid speakers. It’s not as good as the Skullcandy setup on Toshiba’s Chromebook 2, but it’s better than I expected and certainly good enough for music or video playback in a pinch. Listening to music over headphones sounded similarly clean, with no distortion and clear playback at both high and low volumes.
As for ports, the Chromebook 13 gives you the essentials, but not much else; here are two USB ports (one 2.0 and one 3.0), an HDMI connection, a headphone jack and a microSD slot. The latter is probably my biggest issue with the laptop’s hardware: This computer feels big enough that having a full-sized SD slot on board shouldn’t have been a problem. Not having one means you’ll likely need a cable or adapter to get photos off a digital camera, which is a bummer. There’s also a 720p camera for video calls that does its job, but is otherwise unspectacular.
Performance and battery life

Dell is offering a wide variety of hardware configurations for its Chromebook 13. The $429 base model currently for sale (which I tested) features a Celeron 3205U processor along with 4GB of RAM, a 16GB solid-state drive and that 1080p non-touch display. (There’s also a $399 model with only 2GB of RAM; it’s not on sale yet and we do not recommend buying any computer with that little memory.) You can bump the processor up to a Core i3 or i5, increase storage to 32GB, jam in 8GB of RAM or get a model with a touchscreen. But for most customers, the low-end model will probably be enough for their needs — Dell’s base 13-inch Chromebook is a solid performer that outdoes just about all its competition.
| SunSpider v.1.0.2* | Google Octane | Mozilla Kraken* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell Chromebook 13 (Celeron 3205U, 4GB RAM) | 371ms |
14,430 |
2,242ms |
| ASUS Chromebook Flip (Rockchip RK3288C, 4GB RAM) | 700ms |
6,748 |
5,527ms |
| Chromebook Pixel (2015, Core i5, Intel HD 5500) | 298ms |
23,907 |
1,428ms |
| Toshiba Chromebook 2 (Celeron N2840, 4GB RAM) | 967ms |
7,714 |
4,284ms |
| Samsung Chromebook 2 (11-inch, Celeron N2840, 2GB RAM) | 525ms |
7,223 |
3,936ms |
| Acer Chromebook 13 (NVIDIA Tegra K1, 2GB RAM) | 609ms |
7,051 |
4,816ms |
| Lenovo N20p (Celeron N2830, 2GB RAM) | 567ms |
7,288 |
4,287ms |
| ASUS C200 Chromebook (Celeron N2830, 2GB RAM) | 483ms |
7,198 |
4,291ms |
| Acer C720 Chromebook (Celeron 2955U, 2GB RAM) | 342ms |
11,502 |
2,614ms |
| Dell Chromebook 11 (Celeron 2955U, 4GB RAM) | 340ms |
11,533 |
2,622ms |
|
*SunSpider and Kraken: Lower scores are better. |
|||
Intel’s newer Celeron 3205U processor appears to be a big step up over the N2840 model used in last year’s Toshiba Chromebook 2, although it’s not as big a step up over the Celeron 2955U chip used in the Acer C720 and Dell’s own 11-inch model. But the only Chromebook we’ve tested that definitively outperforms Dell’s new model is the Pixel. It wasn’t just in these benchmarks, either — the Chromebook 13 rarely slowed down at all, no matter how many tabs I had open. I’d typically have instances of Tweetdeck, Slack, Simplenote and Google Play Music or Spotify running alongside at least two more Chrome windows full of tabs and things ran smoothly nearly all the time. If I really pushed the number of tabs, I could cause music playback to start stuttering a bit, but in my normal usage scenarios, the Chromebook 13 ran admirably.
That excellence extended to the battery life. If I brought this computer fully charged to the office and forgot the power cable, I would not even break a sweat. As I write this review, the Chromebook 13 has been off the charger for over seven hours — and the computer still has 33 percent of its battery life left. That’s simply excellent, and results when running our battery test (looping HD video playback with screen brightness set to 65 percent) were similarly strong. Dell’s Chromebook 13 lasted 10 hours and 25 minutes during our test. This laptop also charges particularly fast — plugging it in completely dead for 30 minutes got me up to 35 percent, which is good for over three hours of work according to the battery life indicator. And it only took about 90 minutes to charge it completely.
|
Battery life |
|
|---|---|
| Dell Chromebook 13 | 10:25 |
| MacBook Air (13-inch, 2013) | 12:51 |
| ASUS Chromebook Flip | 10:49 |
| HP Spectre x360 | 11:34 |
| Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, 2015) | 11:23 |
| ASUS C200 Chromebook | 11:19 |
| Acer Chromebook 13 | 10:07 |
| Chromebook Pixel (2015) | 10:01 |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | 9:11 |
| Samsung Chromebook 2 (13-inch) | 8:22 |
| HP Stream 11 | 8:17 |
| Apple MacBook (2015) | 7:47 |
| Dell XPS 13 (2015) | 7:36 |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro | 7:36 |
| Lenovo LaVie Z | 7:32 |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | 7:08 |
| Lenovo LaVie Z 360 | 6:54 |
| Toshiba Chromebook 2 | 6:34 |
| Acer C720 Chromebook | 6:27 (Core i3) / 5:57 (Celeron) |

Of course, none of this matters if you can’t live your computing life in Chrome OS. If you haven’t checked it out lately, it’s a much more mature OS than it was a couple years ago. Almost every part of my daily workflow functions perfectly well in Chrome. Slack, Tweetdeck, Simplenote, Dropbox and Wunderlist all run as well as browser tabs as they do on my Mac; Spotify’s web player has improved a lot over the last year; and, obviously, all Google apps and services work like a charm. With more and more software moving online, the case against a Chromebook is harder to make these days. Even the Office documents I have stored in my Dropbox are easy enough to edit: I can access them through the Dropbox web interface, open them in Office Online with one click, make my edits, save them and exit right back to Dropbox. It’s a surprisingly efficient workflow that makes having a full Office install basically unnecessary for me.
Yes, there will always be people who need more full desktop-class apps, but nearly everything seems to be moving online right now — even Photoshop will work on Chromebooks soon enough. You should still carefully consider what you need your computer to do before buying a Chrome device, but I’m finding more and more apps every year that let me accomplish nearly everything I want to do with a Chromebook. Photo editing does remain a big problem — Google Photos is a wonderful place to back up, view, share and make minor tweaks to your pictures, something that’ll be enough for most people. But when it came time to process the photos for this review, I went right back to my Mac. Sooner or later, I’m sure this issue will be solved, but we’re not there quite yet.
The competition
At $429, Dell’s Chromebook 13 is in a class of its own. As I’ve mentioned, most other Chromebooks out there can’t really compete on fit and finish, display quality, overall hardware or performance. There is one that can: Toshiba’s newest Chromebook 2. Toshiba just updated the laptop with a newer Celeron CPU — and it’s selling for a full $100 less. And if you want more power, you can upgrade it to a Core i3 processor for the same $429 as Dell’s Celeron model goes for. We haven’t tested it yet, so the question of battery life remains; the original Toshiba Chromebook 2 lagged behind a lot of the competition in that department. The Dell model also feels like a more solid piece of hardware, although Toshiba’s screen is probably the better of the two. I’m partial to the great keyboard and insane battery life of the Dell, but your mileage may vary.
Wrap-up

It’s a good time to be in the market for a Chromebook. That’s because laptops like Dell’s newest model go a long way toward dispelling the notion that Chromebooks are cheap, compromised machines that don’t have the hardware or software to cut it as your main computer. Chrome OS will likely always lack some features or applications that Windows or Mac options offer — but for a lot of people, living life in the browser is becoming more and more viable every day.
Until recently, finding good Chrome OS hardware has been as hard (or harder) than finding a good web-based workflow — but Dell’s Chromebook 13 raises the bar on how good a relatively inexpensive computer can be. Yes, it costs more than most other options out there, but you get a lot for your money. If you’re on a tight budget, Toshiba’s Chromebook 2 is probably a better option, but for my money, the Dell is the best Chromebook I’ve used. There’s just no compromise to speak of here, and as such it’s an easy laptop to recommend to anyone who might want to make a Chromebook their main computer. That may have been a crazy idea just a few years ago, but it’s not anymore.
Authorities test autonomous helicopter’s firefighting capabilities
Lockheed Martin’s and Kaman’s K-MAX helicopters are known for transporting cargo in Afghanistan, but it might soon be saving lives and nature in the US, as well. The companies have demonstrated an autonomous K-MAX with firefighting capabilities in front of federal officials on October 14th near Boise, Idaho. While there was a pilot onboard during the flight, he had his hands up most of the time, indicating that the aircraft can fly on its own. Within an hour-and-a-half, the chopper completed seven tasks, including scooping up water and dropping it on targets.
Feds want to use autonomous choppers to fight wildfires, as they the can fly at night and even in low visibility (e.g. when the smoke gets too thick), without endangering pilots’ lives. The K-MAX used for the demo flight can be controlled remotely, though it can also fly on its own — even if it loses its connection with ground control — so long as it’s preprogrammed with a route and a destination. It’s equipped with three communication methods and has two different satellite links, as well. Authorities are still considering other companies’ choppers for the project, but Interior Department’s Mark Bathrick said autonomous helicopters could be battling wildfires as soon as next summer.
[Image credit: Lockheed Martin]
Via: ABC News
Source: US Department of the Interior
Your PS Vita deserves to live again
There’s no PS Vita 2 on the horizon. So now what? There are a whole bunch of reasons why the now three year-old handheld may not be the mega-hit that Sony hoped for. As Kotaku’s elaborated on already, the company isn’t completely blameless, but that isn’t to say there aren’t plenty of reasons to still pick up a Vita, play the crap out of it, recharge it and do it all again. Here’s a handful of ’em to start you off. We also want to hear your own recommendations, which is what our new comment system was made for. Slideshow-328533
Hacker drama ‘Mr. Robot’ hits the UK via Amazon Prime Video
Britain is fast-approaching winter, and as temperatures plummet we’re all a little more inclined to stay indoors and binge-watch TV shows at the weekend. If you’re looking for some TV inspiration, you might want to check out Mr. Robot, which dropped on Amazon’s Prime Video service in the UK today. The show follows Elliot, a cyber-security engineer that works as a vigilante hacker by night. It’s already built up quite a following in the US, but until now there hasn’t been a way to watch it legally in the UK. The first season is only 10 episodes long, so it should be a little easier than The Walking Dead to binge-watch over a weekend. If streaming them all back-to-back sounds a little much though, there’s always Beasts of No Nation, the first feature film by Netflix, that can act as a palette cleanser.
[Image Credit: USA Network]
Source: Amazon
US appeals court rules Google’s book-scanning project is legal
Google’s goal of scanning millions of out-of-print books for online access has drawn the ire of authors and publishers for years. Today, a US appeals court ruled that the practice is in fact legal. Claims of infringement brought by the Authors Guild and a group of writers were rejected by the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York. The court says Google Books offers a public service by posting pieces of text online and that it doesn’t encroach on laws that protect intellectual property. Instead, the practice falls under “fair use.” This isn’t the first time the legal system has sided with Mountain View, despite repeated attempts by authors, publishers and rival tech companies to combat the book-scanning project. Back in 2011, a $125 million settlement was rejected by a judge in New York who originally approved the deal in 2009 four years after the first lawsuit was filed. Perhaps today’s ruling will be the last we hear of the Google Books saga. But then again, probably not.
[Image credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images]
Source: Reuters
Researchers build a cheap camera that sees what we can’t
Normally, our eyes can see things better than our cameras, which is why those smartphone shots of a full moon at night are so bad. Hyperspectral imaging is a way to fix that, since it can capture parts of the electromagnetic spectrum, like near-infra-red light, that humans are incapable of seeing. Unfortunately, these cameras are hideously expensive, so you’re more likely to find one on a military satellite than in Best Buy. Thankfully, a team made up of members from the University of Washington and Microsoft Research think that they’ve been able to create a hyperspectral camera smartphone accessory that would cost just $50. It’s not just useful for improving your Instagrams, either, since these devices can tell you if fruit has gone bad, peer into your body and even find mineral deposits underground.
Washington and Microsoft’s version is called Hypercam, and will capture a series of 17 images at various points of the spectrum. Then, much like a HDR image, software will mash them together in the hope of finding things that wouldn’t be visible otherwise. There’s a security element to all of this, too, since these cameras can spot the structure of someone’s veins and skin pattern — similar to Fujitsu’s palm vein sensing technology. Researchers have also used the gear to scan avocados and were able to tell with a 94 percent success rate if they were ripe enough to eat or not. Admittedly, it’s not the first time that we’ve seen “cheap” hyperspectral cameras: the University of Vienna was able to knock one up with a DSLR and some PVC pipe back in 2012.
Now that the team has shown off its findings, however, it’s back to the lab in order to try and refine the technology some more. For instance, the gear doesn’t work particularly well in bright light, and there’s still the issue of making it small enough to clip onto a smartphone. Whatever happens, the idea of using your phone to check if food is safe to eat is enough to get us excited on this chilly October day.
[Image Credit: University of Washington]
Source: University of Washington













