BlackBerry reveals the lengths it went to make Android ‘secure’
BlackBerry’s reputation for security is so strong that its devices are frequently used by world leaders as their go-to smartphone of choice. With the forthcoming Priv, the firm has had to try and bring its brand-name security to Android, an operating system with a less-than stellar history when it comes to security and privacy. In order to reassure customers that the Priv has all of the benefits you’ll find on its BB10 handsets, Alex Manea, BlackBerry’s director of security, has opened up on the measures it took to make Android secure.
Back in July, Google revealed that it was teaming up with BlackBerry to create a vision of Android that would bake in BES12, the Canadian firm’s enterprise security service. In addition, each Priv handset has its own cryptographic key that’s been added at the hardware level to prevent any tampering out in the field. This key can then verify the software that’s running on the phones at any given time, ensuring that apps with malicious intent won’t run. BlackBerry also “hardened” the Linux kernel with various top-secret patches, plus the Priv will use the firm’s secure network for pushing data between users. Finally, there’s DTEK, a new app that monitors what software accesses your private data and can advise if your passwords are too easy to guess. We won’t know for sure if any of this effort has been worthwhile until the phone gets out into the hands of the masses, but at least BlackBerry is sure that it’s brought its A game.
Source: BlackBerry
New 64 GB Axon Pro and cheaper Axon enter the USA via ZTE’s online store

The ZTE Axon Pro will no longer be lonely in the USA market. The manufacturer is making this morning exciting by launching a couple new offerings for those who simply don’t think the current offering was enough. These would be a 64 GB Axon Pro and the new Axon (the most affordable of the bunch).
Wait… so what about the other Axon – the one that was first announced and we even reviewed? I know it’s confusing – it turns out that device was renamed as the Axon Pro when it came to the USA, and the newer Axon is a different handset. Now that we have that cleared we can move on to the juicy part of the news.

Let’s step back a second and contemplate on the first paragraph, where I say people may think the Axon Pro is not enough. How could that be? The Axon Pro is a hell of a smartphone, but it only has one storage option and no microSD card support. That was inconvenient and quite annoying, to be frank. And though the smartphone is certainly affordable, it doesn’t quite hit that mid-end level yet. The new Axon Pro takes things a step above with superior storage, while the Axon tackles accessibility.
| ZTE Axon | ZTE Axon Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Software | Android 5.1.1 Lollipop | Android 5.1.1 Lollipop |
| Display | 5.5-inch 1920×1080 display | 5.5-inch 2560x1440p display |
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 CPU |
| RAM | 2GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB | 32/64 GB |
| Rear-facing camera | 13 MP + 2 MP dual camera | 13 MP + 2 MP dual camera |
| Front-facing camera | 2MP | 8 MP |
| Battery | 3,000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
ZTE claims to have put close attention to users, which is the key reason why the main update in the higher-end handset is the addition of a 64 GB iteration. This will prove to be a major inclusion to Axon Pro fans who were holding off due to storage limitations.

.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;
On the other hand we have the ZTE Axon, with a lower resolution display and those dreaded, non-expandable 32 GB of internal storage. Those who don’t need too much storage or a fancy screen are in for a treat, though. The ZTE Axon is only $329.99. Meanwhile, the 32 GB Axon Pro has been dropped to $399.99, while the 64 GB iteration is now $449.99.
You can now grab all three from ZTE’s official website, so click on the button below and check them out first-hand! Then come back and let us know what you think of these new offerings. Are you signing up for any of them?
Deal: Brand new unlocked LG G3 on eBay for just $239.99
The LG G3 turned many heads when it released last year given the QHD screen it shipped with. The device got a lot of things right, and was selected as an Editor’s Choice when we reviewed it in June of last year. Joshua gave it a 9.0 and praised the design, display, handling, specs, laser focus system, and even the UI for it’s – then – new features. LG also made news when it became the first third party OEM to update their device to Lollipop, and in lickity-split time no less!
Thanks to an New Jersey based seller on eBay, an unlocked 32GB T-Mobile variant (D851) can be yours for just $239.99 while supplies last. The device is sold unlocked, thus no contract is needed.
The auction specifies the following main details:
The LG G3 features laser auto-focus for the best pictures, 32GB of internal memory. It is unlocked for worldwide use on GSM networks.
- Phone, Wall Charger, USB cable
- New, original box (seal broken for unlocking)
- Unlocked T-Mobile
- T-Mobile branded
Product Features / Specs:
- 2G: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900; 3G: HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100; 4G: LTE band 2(1900), 4(1700/2100), 7(2600), 17(700)
- Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat), upgradable to v5.0 (Lollipop)
- Quad-core 2.5 GHz Krait 400
- 32 GB, 3 GB RAM
- Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot
- 13 MP, 4160 x 3120 pixels, phase detection/laser autofocus, optical image stabilization, dual-LED (dual tone) flash
- 5.5 inch screen

Economy shipping appears to be offered free of charge, with Fed-Ex options available for incremental rates. Please check the auction for details and/or inquire with the seller directly to avoid any possible purchase problems in advance.
Please note that only the Black color variant is being sold, and there are limited quantities available.
Those in need of a refresher can watch our full review of the G3 here:
For the auction itself, please click the link below:
Spent on specs: are smartphone component wars overrated?

Think of a flagship, any flagship. Now think of just why that device is labeled as such. Naturally, it represents the best of a company’s product line for the year or season. But it’s also a spectacle in terms of the specs themselves, both the checklist and the potential backlash that will occur when any given product goes against the “masses”. Funny though, as the real masses don’t seem to notice or care about the issue at all, rather it’s a very select group of individuals who truly care.
Sold on specs
One of the most amusing parts of a phone review is the “gaming” segment. Despite time marching on, writers, bloggers, and videologgers still seem to be reusing the same zombie-hunting or racing games, month after month after month. Clearly the high spec hardware is supposed to show them off beautifully, yet why aren’t there hundreds of spec-spectacle apps being made, or at least a few dozen? Ironically, many of the games that are recommended tend to be those that don’t require blazing hardware components to run.
Arguably some of the best games don’t even require top-specs.
Of course, the whole spec wars issue goes back ages. Anyone over the age of 30 will likely remember the countless arguments had on the playground spent debating whether the Super NES was better than the Genesis (or even Turbo-Grafx). Indeed people love to compare theirs and have an intrinsic, almost primal need to show off their “it” thing as being better than everyone else’s.
When push comes to shove, does having the highest specs ever really matter? The way that some rant about benchmark results is just absurd at times: a device hasn’t even been announced, let alone the leaks sufficiently lubricated, and already there are complaints about score “X” being too low, or a device being “crap” because it’s only packing “Y” SoC instead of “Z”. Never mind the user experience or the build quality or anything else. Specs are apparently all that matters.
And yet, do they really?
Sensible specs

Having the latest and greatest is not always a sure-fire win, to say the least. Qualcomm has certainly found this out the hard way in 2015 with its Snapdragon 810 SoC being almost untouchable. The company has promised major innovations with next year’s 820, but it’s likely at least a full quarter away, if not more.
Still, just what are people doing with these specs? Some are quick to point out that smartphones today have more power than the Apollo 11 did. That’s all well and good. Then again, will the average customer ever need this kind of power? Assuming they do nothing more than browse the internet, play some light games, take pictures, and make occasional phone calls, why on earth is 4GB of RAM an “absolute must”? Who cares if the SoC is an 805 or 808?
Many spec-enthusiasts were outraged LG went with a “paltry” Snapdragon 808 in its flagship G4.
The problem, perhaps, is that the vocal minority are the ones who tend to be heard the loudest, and thus it’s easy to assume their needs reflect those of the public-at-large. It’s directly parallel to the PC problem: how many tens of millions of users will be running multiple virtual desktops and environments with dozens of browser tabs running simultaneously? How many billions of people make it a point to only play a game if the FPS is running at over 50 on a QHD display?
When the average person doesn’t even know what FHD or QHD means let alone 4K, how big a difference does it make if the resolution is “only” SHD? Perhaps they can see the difference side-by-side, but do they care? The same goes with AMOLED vs LCD, or even TFT. To an extent, a debate like Snapdragon vs Exynos vs MediaTek vs Kirin is moot when considering that the average end user won’t even know what those names mean let alone know about what process was used to fabricate them.
Why specs ARE relevant
Qualcomm has big things planned for the Snapdragon 820.
Some might be quick to dismiss the entire issue of specs, arguing that they don’t matter if the main purpose of a purchase is just to do basic things. To an extent this is true, but pick up any Gingerbread-era device (such as the Nexus S) and spend a day with it. See if it doesn’t drive you mad with lag, rage over RAM, and curse over crashes. In truth, it’s not that the phone itself is “bad”, it’s just that the very apps themselves have drastically evolved from the early versions back in 2010. So too has the content on the internet.
These days, “mid-to-low” spec devices have more power than even the original top-tier OEM offerings, yet they stutter and lag. This is because the bare minimum requirements to run the “internet” and apps has evolved dramatically. Granted, it’s all a matter of expectations and familiarity: if someone has never used a top tier device before, then they won’t know what they’re missing. Likewise, if a spec-junkie suddenly test drives a Galaxy J1, they might be downright shocked.
At the end of the day, while top notch specs aren’t the be-all, end-all of smartphones, they do seek to define the very user experience that customers will have, and that can make a world of difference.
Wrap up

While it is safe to say that specs are important to an extent, things have perhaps gotten a bit out of hand when people are attacking any given OEM for failing to live up to “expectations” on a new product’s spec sheet. These companies are fighting a war that has little meaning for the time being (though it is relevant for the progress of technology) and it’s partially fueled by the demands and expectations of the very customers they sell to.
With this now said, we would like the pose the question to you, the reader: Just how important are specs to you, and which specs in particular are relevant? Please feel free to take the surveys below and then share your thoughts in the comments section!
(function ()
var opst = document.createElement(‘script’);
var os_host = document.location.protocol == “https:” ? “https:” : “http:”;
opst.type = ‘text/javascript’;
opst.async = true;
opst.src = os_host + ‘//’ + ‘www.opinionstage.com/polls/2303119/embed.js’;
(document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0] ());
(function ()
document.getElementsByTagName(‘body’)[0]).appendChild(opst);
());
Surface Pro 4 review: Yes, it can really replace your laptop
With the Surface Pro 4, Microsoft’s surprising hybrid tablet journey finally makes sense. It’s as if Microsoft was laser-focused on fixing the issues we had with the Surface Pro 3. We liked that device quite a bit, but its Type Cover was endlessly frustrating, with a sloppy keyboard and wonky trackpad. The new keyboard, on the other hand, is far sturdier and more laptop-like, and its trackpad is no longer a thing of nightmares. It’s taken a while, but the Surface Pro 4 shows Microsoft has finally accomplished everything it set out to do when it unveiled its crazy hybrid tablet concept three years ago (which makes the announcement of the Surface Book even more curious). Aside from improving the battery life and bundling in the Type Cover (just do it, already), it’s hard to imagine how much better the Surface Pro line can get. Slideshow-332228
![]()
Hardware
The biggest knock against the Surface Pro 4 is that it looks just like the Surface Pro 3. But honestly, that’s not a huge complaint since the Pro 3 still feels like a marvel of engineering today. Their frames are similarly thick (9.1mm on the Pro 3 versus 8.45mm on the Pro 4) and weigh at or near 800 grams (the entry-level Core M3 Surface Pro 4 weighs 766 grams or 1.69 pounds), making them a tad heavier and thicker than most large tablets. They also share the same magnesium case and adjustable kickstand, which can fold out almost completely flat to 150 degrees. The dimensions might not sound very exciting when compared to the ultra-thin tablets we’re seeing these days, but they’re particularly impressive when you consider that Microsoft is able to fit in modern Intel desktop chips, and not just slower mobile processors.
Look a bit closer at the front of the Surface Pro 4, however, and you’ll quickly notice some differences versus its predecessor. The screen is ever so slightly larger at 12.3 inches, for one. Microsoft chipped away at the bezel around the screen to make that possible, and it also removed the capacitive Windows button on the bezel (which is less necessary with Windows 10). The volume rocker has also been moved from the left side of the case to the top, right beside the power button. (It’s also a bit more confusing this time, since tapping left on the rocker increases the volume, while tapping right decreases it.)

Unfortunately, Microsoft didn’t add much in the way of ports. There’s still just one USB 3.0 socket and a Mini DisplayPort, which might pose a problem for road warriors with lots of peripherals. (If you’re in that boat, though, you’re probably also traveling with a USB hub.) Once again, there’s a microSD card slot under the kickstand, which lets you add up to 128GB of additional storage. Microsoft is also sticking with its proprietary power connector, which is a shame — it still feels a bit awkward and insecure when it’s connected. I’d love to see Microsoft make the move to USB Type-C next year (which would also be an easy way to include more USB connections). On the plus side, there’s still an extra USB charging port on the Surface Pro 4’s power adapter. You can never really have enough of those.
The Surface Pro 4 has a new 5-megapixel front-facing shooter that’s also compatible with Windows Hello, the company’s biometric authentication technology. Sadly, I wasn’t able to test it out in time for this review (Microsoft says it’ll be enabled with a software update), but from demonstrations I’ve seen, it typically logs you in within a few seconds. Windows Hello has the potential to completely change the way we interact with our computers, so I’ll definitely follow up once it’s working. On the rear, there’s an 8-megapixel camera with 1080p video support.
As a tablet, the Surface feels heftier than most, but it’s still easy enough to hold in one hand while browsing the web or hopping through Windows apps. The magnesium case gives it a premium feel and the kickstand is as sturdy as ever. It requires a bit of work to open up, but at least you don’t have to worry about it losing its position easily.
Display and pen input

The Surface Pro 4’s display is not only slightly bigger, but also sharper than last year’s model, with 2,736 by 1,824 resolution (around 267 pixels per inch). It packs in even more pixels than Apple’s 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro, which sports a resolution of 2,560 by 1,600. It’s not even worth comparing the Surface Pro 4 to the 13-inch MacBook Air, whose screen tops out at a comparatively low-res 1,440 by 900.
All of those pixels make for incredibly crisp text, razor-sharp photos and a great movie-viewing experience. You won’t see any individual pixels here, unless you’ve got a magnifying glass handy. For the most part, the Surface Pro 4 also delivered accurate colors, no matter what I was looking at. It’s plenty bright, too, even in direct sunlight. As with any glass-covered display (Gorilla Glass 4, in this case), there’s some reflection from light sources, but it otherwise does a good job of minimizing glare.
Microsoft has always managed to cram in great screens in the Surface line — this one just happens to be exceptional. It’s also dubbed this a “PixelSense” display, which is just a fancy marketing term for its incredibly thin stack of optical and pen-input components.

Speaking of pen input, Microsoft also made some significant changes to the Surface Pen this time around. It offers 1,024 levels of pressure sensitivity now (compared to 256 levels from before); there’s an eraser at the top that actually works as you’d expect; and it also magnetically attaches to the side of the Surface. That’s a big step beyond just holstering it in the Type Cover. Most importantly, though, it simply feels great. Using the Surface Pen is almost as good as putting a pencil to paper. That’s due to a combination of new pen tip and input technology. You’ll also be able to swap out the Surface Pen tips in the future, which will let you tweak its performance to better suit handwriting or drawing.
Admittedly, I’m not much of an artist. But the Surface Pro 4 and the new Surface Pen did a better job of capturing my scribbles than past Surface models, not to mention other devices, like Samsung’s Note phones and tablets. Taking handwritten notes felt natural and fluid — I can imagine it being particularly useful for instances where you need to draw diagrams more than jot down text. Just like with the Surface Pro 3, clicking the top of the pen almost instantly opens up a blank OneNote file. Tap it again and it gets sent off to your OneDrive.
Typing experience

Microsoft’s new Type Cover is simply a revelation: It finally brings a killer keyboard to the Surface lineup. It’s a tad heavier than the last Type Cover (0.68 pound compared to 0.65 pound), but it offers an experience that’s just as good as most high-end laptops. The keys stick out slightly from the cover now, rather than being uniformly flat, which gives them more feedback than before. The new Type Cover is also far stiffer — it stays flat even when confronted with heavy typers like myself. (There’s also another version of the new Type Cover coming that includes a fingerprint reader for around $150.)
So how good is it, really? I was able to transcribe a 30-minute interview while sitting on a park bench, with the Surface Pro 4 in my lap, in about the same amount of time it would take me on my 13-inch MacBook Air. I’m a pretty fast touch-typer, and I never felt like I had to slow my pace while jotting down that interview. That’s particularly impressive since past Surface models, even on a completely flat table, always required some sort of compromise when typing. I’ll admit, getting used to balancing the kickstand on your leg takes a bit of time, but once you find the right position, it’s just as “lappable” as a typical laptop. As you can see in the video above, the Type Cover also makes a solid connection to the Surface, so much so that you can lift the tablet just by lifting up the cover.
Not only has the typing experience been improved, but also the Type Cover finally delivers a decent trackpad. It’s 40 percent larger than the previous model, but most importantly, it’s smooth (finally, it’s made of glass!) and accurate. When it came to scrolling and using multi-finger gestures, it felt almost as good as my MacBook Air. The last Type Cover’s trackpad was so infuriating, with a general lack of accuracy and a tendency to misread swipes and clicks, that I avoided using it at all costs. Back in our Surface Pro 3 review, we even suggested that power users would be better off with a wireless mouse. That’s not the case here.
One of the best things about the new Type Cover: It’s also compatible with the Surface Pro 3. Credit to Microsoft for taking care of its existing customers.
Performance and battery life
| PCMark7 | PCMark8 (Creative Accelerated) | 3DMark11 | 3DMark (Sky Diver) | ATTO (top reads/writes) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface Pro 4 (2.4GHz Core i5-6300U, Intel HD 520) | 5,403 | 3,602 | E2,697/ P1,556/ X422 | 3,614 | 1.6 GB/s / 529 MB/s |
| Surface Pro 3 (1.9GHz Core i5-4300U, Intel HD 4400) | 5,024 | N/A |
E1,313 / P984 |
N/A | 555 MB/s / 252 MB/s |
| Surface Book (2.4GHz Core i5-6300U, Intel HD 520) | 5,412 | 3,610 |
E2758 / P1578 / X429 |
3,623 | 1.6 GB/s / 571 MB/s |
| Surface Book (2.6GHz Core i7-6600U, 1GB NVIDIA GeForce graphics) | 5,740 | 3,850 |
E4122 / P2696 |
6,191 | 1.55 GB/s / 608 MB/s |
| Lenovo LaVie Z (2.4GHz Intel Core i7-5500U, Intel HD 5500) | 5,232 | N/A |
E2001/ P1122 / X310 |
N/A | 555 MB/s / 245 MB/s |
| HP Spectre x360 (2015, 2.2GHz Intel Core i5-5200U, Intel HD 5500) | 4,965 | N/A |
E1667 / P932 / X265 |
N/A | 555 MB/s / 270 MB/s |
| Dell XPS 13 (2015, 2.2GHz Intel Core i5-5200U, Intel HD 5500) | 4,900 | N/A |
E2114 / P1199 / X330 |
N/A | 515 MB/s / 455 MB/s |
When it comes down to pure computational performance, I didn’t feel a huge difference between the Surface Pro 4 and the Pro 3. I’m testing a Core i5 model running at 2.4GHz with 8GB of RAM, so sure, it’s technically zippier than the Core i5 I tested last year. Really, though, it’s more useful to look at the productivity benefits the Surface Pro 4 delivers with the new Surface Pen and Type Cover. And in that respect, it’s a night-and-day difference from its predecessor.
Transcribing isn’t fun, folks — the fact that I was able to jot down a lengthy and dense interview with the new Type Cover in a less-than-ideal seating situation, with the Surface balanced on my lap, is worth praising. I also didn’t have any trouble fitting the Surface Pro 4 into my daily workflow, which is something the Pro 3 never quite achieved. Microsoft has finally managed to build a Surface that can keep up with me productivity-wise. That’s a huge win.
|
Battery life |
|
|---|---|
| Surface Pro 4 | 7:15 |
| Surface Book (Core i5, integrated graphics) | 13:54 / 3:20 (tablet only) |
| Surface Book (Core i7, discrete graphics) | 11:31 / 3:02 (tablet only) |
| MacBook Air (13-inch, 2013) | 12:51 |
| HP Spectre x360 | 11:34 |
| Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, 2015) | 11:23 |
| Chromebook Pixel (2015) | 10:01 |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | 9:11 |
| Apple MacBook (2015) | 7:47 |
| Dell XPS 13 (2015) | 7:36 |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro | 7:36 |
| Lenovo LaVie Z | 7:32 |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | 7:08 |
| Lenovo LaVie Z 360 | 6:54 |
Despite being a huge leap forward in many ways, the Surface Pro 4 still falters in one critical area: battery life. In typical daily usage, which mostly consists of lots of web browsing, some image editing, constant Spotify streaming and a bunch of Slack messaging, it usually lasted me between five and seven hours. In our standard rundown test (looping a video until the battery dies), it lasted around seven hours and 15 minutes. That’s pretty disappointing for a flagship device in 2015 — especially when the MacBook Air has been getting almost double that amount for a few years now (it’s worth noting that the super-thin MacBook clocks only 7:47 in our test). Of course, the Surface Pro 4’s svelte design limits the size of the battery Microsoft can actually fit in, but it’s still a shame that it won’t last a full workday.
Configuration options and the competition

While the Surface Pro 4 starts at $899 for the Core M3 version, we’d really recommend spending the extra $100 to step up to the Core i5 model with 4GB of RAM and 128GB SSD, at the bare minimum. If you want something more, it’s worth shelling out for the $1,299 Core i5 model with 8GB RAM and 256GB SSD. And if you’re particularly power hungry, you can nab the Core i7 Surface Pro 4 starting at $1,599 with 8GB of RAM and 256GB SSD.
Of course, you’ll also have to add another $130 to your total for the Type Cover, which is once again sold separately. I’m not sure why Microsoft still thinks anyone would buy a Surface Pro without a keyboard, especially when it’s positioning it as a device that can replace your existing laptop. You wouldn’t expect a MacBook or an HP laptop to show up at your door without a keyboard, would you? It’s worth noting that all of the Surface competitors we mention below come with keyboards. And while Apple’s new Surface-inspired iPad Pro also has a separate keyboard accessory, Apple has been very careful to position that device as mainly a tablet.
Even with the lowly Core M3 processor, an entry-level Surface Pro 4 will end up costing you around $1,030 once you add in the Type Cover. And if you want something decently powerful with a Core i5 chip, you’re looking at a $1,130 layout. I’m not pushing for Microsoft to offer the Type Cover for free (although it’s not as if it can’t absorb that loss to make the Surface successful), but it would be nice if it were more transparent with its advertised pricing.
Every time I bring up this issue with Microsoft reps, they repeat the same pre-programmed mantra: “We believe we’re delivering significant value with the Surface.” That may be technically true, but I don’t think most consumers would call the Surface’s semi-hidden fees a “significant value.”

When it comes to the competition, this year is looking far more interesting than the last few. We’re now seeing Surface-like devices all over the place: HP has the Spectre x2; Lenovo has the Miix 700; and Dell has the revamped XPS 12. And of course, there’s the iPad Pro on the horizon, which starts at $799 and has the aforementioned keyboard accessory and a stylus of its own, the $99 Apple Pencil (sold separately). If you’re looking for something with a bit more horsepower, it’s also hard to ignore Microsoft’s other hybrid laptop, the Surface Book ($1,499 … with a keyboard).
Wrap-up

The Surface Pro 3 was a sign that Microsoft’s crazy hybrid tablet experiment might actually have legs. The Surface Pro 4, on the other hand, is the company’s Surface dream made real. Everything Microsoft promised at that surprise Surface unveiling in 2012 is here today with the Pro 4. Future models might eventually fix the battery life issue and add faster hardware, but we’ll likely remember the Surface Pro 4 as the turning point for Microsoft.
If anything, Microsoft’s big problem now isn’t with building a killer device; it’s with public perception. It took several failed Surface models to get to this point, and the company might have a hard time convincing consumers that it’s finally cracked the code. But who knows — maybe a free Type Cover would help.
Surface Book review: the ultimate laptop, even if it isn’t perfect
For years, Microsoft has been telling us that the future of PCs was actually the tablet. The Surface Pro in particular is powerful enough that it could truly keep pace with your laptop, and Microsoft hasn’t been shy about comparing it to the MacBook Air. The message seemed clear: The Surface Pro was like a notebook, only better.
And yet, immediately after unveiling the Surface Pro 4 at a keynote earlier this month, Microsoft unleashed one last surprise: the Surface Book. At first glance, it’s a traditional 13-inch notebook, with a premium design, long battery life and the sort of performance you’ll find in only a handful of other laptops, like the MacBook Pro. Unlike a Mac, though, you can remove the screen, turning it into a shockingly light, 1.6-pound tablet — one that happens to pack a notebook-grade Intel Core processor.
This, according to Microsoft, is the “ultimate laptop.”
Slideshow-332227
Hardware and design
![]()
I was sitting in the auditorium where Microsoft unveiled the Surface Book. And a good few minutes passed before I or anybody else in the audience realized the device had a detachable screen. Until you hold down a button to release the display, the Surface Book looks just like any other clamshell laptop, with a spacious keyboard and an apparently fixed screen. That’s the whole point, really: If all you cared about were feeds and speeds, you could buy yourself a Surface Pro 4 with 16GB of RAM and a 1TB SSD, and run Photoshop to your heart’s content. But after years of trying to convince consumers that the Surface Pro could replace a laptop, Microsoft seems to have realized that some people don’t want that; they just want a laptop. The Surface Book is for people who were never open to the idea of balancing a Surface tablet in their laps or typing on a thin Type Cover keyboard. The Surface Book is for people who demand a proper notebook — one that can suffice as a tablet when the occasion calls for it.
A gorgeous, distinctive status symbol.
And what a beautiful laptop it is. Its magnesium casing and blunt, chiseled edges help it look the part of a $1,499 notebook, with details like a chrome Windows logo also serving to remind you just how expensive it is. Far from being just another MacBook Pro, though, the Surface Book has a style unto its own, marked by a funky-looking hinge mechanism that Microsoft calls the Fulcrum. The best way I can describe it is that it looks like a snake folded into itself. Whereas a snake can elongate its body, and in some cases even stand up, the Fulcrum has the same range of motion as a traditional laptop; it’s not like you can flip the screen around 360 degrees into tablet mode. Also, though I never worried the screen would suddenly detach, it wobbles a bit in laptop mode, especially when you tap at the touchscreen. In that sense, then, the Fulcrum was an impractical design choice: It makes the laptop appear needlessly fat when shut, so much so that the lid can’t lie totally flat.
If nothing else, the Fulcrum hinge is interesting looking. Beautiful, even — depending on your taste. As I worked on this review, using the laptop around the office, multiple people stopped me to ask if this was the famous Surface Book. They all wanted to look at it; watch me slide the screen out. Even my mom did a double-take when she saw me using it at her house. “That looks like a nice laptop,” she said. And let me be clear: My mom otherwise doesn’t give a shit about the gadgets I cover. I could go on, but I think you get the point: As gimmicky as that snake-hinge might seem, it does what it’s supposed to. Which is to say, it turns the Surface Book into a status symbol. A gorgeous, distinctive status symbol.
As a notebook

As a laptop with the screen attached, the Surface Book feels heavy, at least compared to other flagship Windows laptops. Then again — and I can’t stress this enough — the Surface Book isn’t like most of the other premium notebooks that cross my desk. Whereas most of those trade on a thin and light design, Microsoft’s laptop is all about horsepower: fast performance, robust graphics and unmatched battery life. You can’t get that in a sub-three-pound laptop, at least not right now. Instead, the Surface Book comes in at 3.34 pounds, or 3.48 with a dedicated GPU. For comparison’s sake, the 13-inch Retina display MacBook Pro also weighs 3.48 pounds, except it doesn’t have a touchscreen, and isn’t offered with discrete graphics. For what it is, the Surface could have been even heavier.
As you take a tour of the device, you’ll find two full-sized USB 3.0 ports on the left side, along with a full-sized SDXC card reader. On the opposite edge is a Mini DisplayPort, along with the same shallow charging connector found on the Surface Pro. As I said in my review of last year’s Pro model (and the one before that), the charging connector can be awkward to insert, and doesn’t always stay put. Finishing up our tour, the power button and volume rocker are both located on the top of the screen, so that you can use them in either laptop or tablet mode. Makes sense to me, though it was mighty confusing the first time I unboxed the Surface and couldn’t initially figure out how to turn the damn thing on.
Finishing up the show-and-tell portion of this presentation, there are speakers built into either edge of the screen, and though the grilles aren’t easy to spot, the sound they produce is louder than you might expect. Sitting alone in a quiet room, a volume level of around 30 out of 100 was more than enough for streaming Spotify; it was rare I even broke the halfway mark. Additionally, the Surface Book includes dual cameras: an 8-megapixel rear-facing unit and a 5MP one up front that supports the Windows Hello facial-recognition option in Windows 10. Both cameras shoot 1080p video, and are helped by two mics, one on each side of the tablet.
As a tablet

If the Surface Book feels slightly heavy, that’s because most of what makes it great — the optional GPU, the larger of the two batteries — is squeezed inside the keyboard. Hold down the button next to the Delete key; wait till it glows green; lift the screen away from the dock; and you’ll be left with a shockingly thin and light tablet. To echo what I said in my initial hands-on, I’ve been reviewing gadgets for eight and a half years now. I’m not easily impressed anymore. Even so, it’s hard not to feel awed by what Microsoft’s done here: cram a fully functioning Core i7 computer into a slab weighing just 1.6 pounds and measuring 7.7mm (0.3 inch). I’d even go so far as to say that the Surface Book does a better job doubling as a tablet than the Surface Pro does as a laptop. Again, though, the question of which you should buy ultimately comes down to what sort of device you’ll use most.

What’s nice about the Surface Book’s screen-detaching mechanism is that it uses software-based controls to make sure you remove the display safely. So, if you’re running a program using the GPU in the keyboard dock, the Surface Book will prompt you to close out of the app; otherwise you won’t be able to remove the screen. When it comes time to reattach the display, you can put it back the way you found it, or you can flip it around with the screen facing away from the keyboard. This is great for presentations, but I don’t recommend pushing the display all the way back into tablet mode — why settle for a three-and-a-half pound tablet when you can have a 1.6-pound one? If you’re wondering, this is also why the Surface Book lacks the sort of 360-degree hinge made popular by Lenovo’s Yoga line: It would solve a problem that doesn’t actually exist on this device.
Reattaching the screen isn’t hard, exactly: Just place the tablet over two guides sticking up from the keyboard dock. I stumbled my first few times doing it, but it’s since become second nature. The only thing I miss is the satisfying click of snapping a Surface into its keyboard cover, but even then, the Surface Book makes a neat little sound to indicate you’ve reattached the screen correctly.
Keyboard and trackpad

I typed most of this review on the Surface Book. In between, when I wasn’t concentrating so much on the task at hand, I used the laptop as my primary machine for email, web surfing, Facebook, Twitter, Google spreadsheets, Slack and every other app I use every day. I think it’s a testament to the Surface Book that I was so willing to make it my daily driver, and the keyboard layout here is definitely a big part of that. The buttons are well-spaced and cushy, with a generous 1.6mm of travel and a sturdy panel that stands up well to vigorous typing. I worried, when I saw the device for the first time, that the keys weren’t springy enough; that they didn’t bounce back much, and might be prone to missing button presses. As it turns out, that hasn’t been an issue — I barely make typos on this thing.
If anything, I wish the keys were quieter. I type quickly, especially once I’ve found my writer’s mojo, and when that happened this week, my typing on the Surface Book got a little clacky. To be fair, it’s no louder than the MacBook, which can also get noisy when I’m on a roll. And not all of my coworkers at Engadget even agree with me: Terrence, a longtime ThinkPad user, says the buttons are actually quieter than what he’s used to. In any case, then, you might not be bothered by the sound at all. And even if you are, it’s no worse than what you’d experience on the MacBook Pro.

As you’d expect of a laptop made by Microsoft, the Surface Book uses one of the company’s own “Precision” touchpads, which you can already find in notebooks made by other manufacturers, like Dell. It’s already the best Windows trackpad, and it mostly works well here, with smooth two-finger scrolling and pinch-to-zoom for things like maps and fine-print pages. As a warning, there were a few times when I booted up the system only to find the touchpad was unresponsive. In each case, a restart did the trick, but a Microsoft rep said the company is aware of the problem and is planning to release a fix through a firmware update. Indeed, I was testing pre-production-level hardware, so there’s a good chance you won’t encounter this issue at all.
Display

The Surface Book has an unusual screen size: 13.5 inches, with an equally odd resolution of 3,000 x 2,000. Microsoft could have easily gone with a more standard cut, like 13.3 inches, but it chose a slightly larger panel so that it could achieve the same 3:2 aspect ratio as its other Surface devices — the idea being that in tablet mode the screen would have the same shape as a pad of paper or a clipboard. In fact, that’s what Microsoft calls the detached screen: not a tablet, but a “clipboard.” Excuse me, but I’ll just call it a tablet anyway if you don’t mind.
Marketing speak aside, that aspect ratio is one of the things that makes the Surface Book so comfortable to use as a standalone slate: It’s not as long in either portrait or landscape mode. If you like, you can also draw on it, using the included pen, which attaches magnetically to the side of the device. (Don’t worry, I keep the pen there regularly and haven’t lost it yet.) The pen now recognizes 1,024 levels of pressure sensitivity and has an eraser at the top, both of which should serve you well in everything from drawing apps to the markup feature in Windows Edge. In OneNote, pen input felt smooth and controlled, with just enough resistance to make it feel sort of like I was writing on paper. (Nothing can fully replicate the real deal, but this was close.) I found that the screen picked up even faint lines without me having to go back and re-trace my marks, and yet it was smart enough to ignore my fingers when I was just picking up the device in my hand.
A “clipboard.”
As a laptop screen, it’s a little taller than other 13-inch notebook displays. As it happens, I’ve spent months using the Chromebook Pixel, which also has a 3:2 panel, so I tend to notice the odd screen shape less than perhaps some casual users might. In any case, even if it looks slightly strange at first, you won’t notice any meaningful difference in the way you use Windows. Yes, if you had a standard 3,200 x 1,800 screen, you’d have 200 extra horizontal pixels for viewing apps side by side. That said, I had no problem multitasking in a split-screen layout, even with slightly fewer pixels from left to right. Conversely, the extra 200 vertical pixels on the Surface Book meant I could technically see just a little bit more of webpages before having to scroll, but it’s not something I ever noticed in practice.
Whether you use it as a laptop or tablet, the display is as gorgeous as you’d expect on something billed as the ultimate laptop. With a pixel density of 267 ppi, it’s even crisper than both the Chromebook Pixel (239 ppi) and the 13-inch Retina display MacBook Pro (227 ppi), and even those make it hard to pick out individual pixels. Aside from the resolution, you’re looking at some rich, but not overbearing colors, with a wide palette that covers 100 percent of the sRGB spectrum. And though the glossy screen finish wasn’t immune to sun glare, I found it mostly stayed readable in different conditions, including my office, where I sit next to an east-facing window that lets in lots of light every morning.
Performance and battery life
| PCMark7 | PCMark8 (Creative Accelerated) | 3DMark11 | 3DMark (Sky Diver) | ATTO (top reads/writes) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surface Book (2.4GHz Core i5-6300U, Intel HD 520) | 5,412 | 3,610 |
E2,758 / P1,578 / X429 |
3,623 | 1.6 GB/s / 571 MB/s |
| Surface Book (2.6GHz Core i7-6600U, 1GB NVIDIA GeForce graphics) | 5,740 | 3,850 |
E4,122 / P2,696 |
6,191 | 1.55 GB/s / 608 MB/s |
| Lenovo LaVie Z (2.4GHz Intel Core i7-5500U, Intel HD 5500) | 5,232 | N/A |
E2,001/ P1,122 / X310 |
N/A | 555 MB/s / 245 MB/s |
| HP Spectre x360 (2015, 2.2GHz Intel Core i5-5200U, Intel HD 5500) | 4,965 | N/A |
E1,667 / P932 / X265 |
N/A | 555 MB/s / 270 MB/s |
| Dell XPS 13 (2015, 2.2GHz Intel Core i5-5200U, Intel HD 5500) | 4,900 | N/A |
E2,114 / P1,199 / X330 |
N/A | 515 MB/s / 455 MB/s |
Over the past two weeks, I’ve had the opportunity to test not one, but two Surface Book configurations: one with a dual-core Core i5-6300U CPU, 8GB of RAM and integrated Intel HD 520 graphics, and another with a Core i7-6600U processor, 16GB of RAM and a custom 1GB GPU based on NVIDIA’s Maxwell architecture. The two machines delivered similar scores in CPU-oriented tests like PCMark, with disk speeds matching as well: top read speeds of about 1.6GB per second, and max reads of around 600 MB/s. Startup is similar across different configurations too: between 10 and 15 seconds to the login screen, which is fast, but also fairly standard for a flagship laptop with an SSD.
But, as you’d expect, the GPU-enabled model soared in graphics tests, sometimes delivering as much as a 70 percent improvement. Clearly, it’s unlike almost any other thin-and-light Windows flagship laptop on the market, and if you intend to use apps like Photoshop or a video editor, you’ll appreciate the added clout. That said, the Surface Book’s results in more gaming-focused tests like 3DMark’s “Sky Driver” benchmark suggest that although the machine has plenty of graphics power, it wasn’t built for gamers. Maybe it was the relatively modest 1GB of VRAM, or maybe this just isn’t the best GPU NVIDIA has to offer, but in Sky Driver’s gaming simulations, titles ran at an average of around 30 frames per second. That’s playable, but it was slow enough that I decided against running additional benchmarks that simulated an even more graphically intensive game.
Also, games were one of the few things to really make the fans start whining. For the most part, during my two weeks of testing, I enjoyed quiet performance, with a chassis that didn’t stay cool, exactly, but never burned my hands or legs either. Get a game going, though, and the fans will get quite loud. To Microsoft’s credit, at least, the noise pipes down quickly — in some cases a few seconds after you close the offending app.
|
Battery life |
|
|---|---|
| Surface Book (Core i5, integrated graphics) | 13:54 / 3:20 (tablet only) |
| Surface Book (Core i7, discrete graphics) | 11:31 / 3:02 (tablet only) |
| MacBook Air (13-inch, 2013) | 12:51 |
| HP Spectre x360 | 11:34 |
| Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, 2015) | 11:23 |
| Chromebook Pixel (2015) | 10:01 |
| Microsoft Surface 3 | 9:11 |
| Apple MacBook (2015) | 7:47 |
| Dell XPS 13 (2015) | 7:36 |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro | 7:36 |
| Lenovo LaVie Z | 7:32 |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 3 | 7:08 |
| Lenovo LaVie Z 360 | 6:54 |
Microsoft rates the Surface Book for up to 12 hours of battery life with the keyboard dock attached. I’d say that’s a conservative estimate: I logged nearly 14 hours on the integrated-graphics model, and that was with a 1080p video looping and the brightness fixed at a punishing 65 percent. Even the configuration with a Core i7 CPU and discrete graphics managed 11 and a half hours in the same test, and that’s on par with the 13-inch MacBook Pro, which doesn’t have discrete graphics. Either way, I have no doubt that with a dimmer setting (not to mention the ambient brightness sensor enabled), you could squeeze out even more runtime.
The catch is that most of that battery capacity lives inside the keyboard dock, meaning you won’t be able to use the Surface Book for more than a few hours in tablet mode before needing a trip back to the charger. With a Core i5 processor, the tablet lasted a brief three hours and 20 minutes; with a more power-hungry i7 chip, that number dropped to three hours.
In any case, I suppose none of this is surprising: It’s a 1.6-pound tablet with a Core processor and a 3,000 x 2,000 screen. Something has to give, and that something is battery life. I won’t knock the Surface Book too much for that, but I would remind you to see this for what it is: a laptop that can be used as a tablet. If what you really want is a tablet that can replace your laptop, you’d be better served by the Surface Pro.
Configuration options
The two Surface Book configurations I tested represent two extremes: the entry-level model and the most tricked-out SKU Microsoft has to offer. Separating them is $1,700 — and a potentially big performance gap. So let’s break down what you can get as you move up in price. Starting at $1,499 you get a Core i5 CPU with 8GB of RAM, a 128GB SSD and integrated graphics. For $200 more ($1,699) you can double the storage to 256GB.
If you want discrete graphics, the least expensive model is the $1,899 configuration, which also has a Core i5, 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage space. From there, you can get a Core i7 machine with the same NVIDIA GPU and 256GB of storage with 8GB of RAM ($2,099), or a 512GB SSD with 16 gigs of memory ($2,699). Finally, that brings us to the big kahuna: a $3,199 beast of a system with a Core i7 processor, 16GB of RAM, discrete graphics and a full terabyte of solid-state storage. Basically: The one we all want, but few of us can afford.
The competition

When Microsoft unveiled the Surface Book, I was just one of many who said that other PC makers should be worried. Still, that doesn’t mean they’re doomed. Although the Dells, HPs and Samsungs of the world sell flagship laptops, most of them are in a different category than the Surface Book. Which is to say, they tend to be thinner and lighter, but their specs aren’t as robust and they aren’t quite as comfortable to use in tablet mode. If you’re looking for a machine with discrete graphics, and maybe 16GB of RAM and a full terabyte of solid-state storage, you wouldn’t have been satisfied with the likes of the Dell XPS 13 ($800-plus) or HP Spectre x360 ($900-plus). Likewise, if you don’t require that level of performance — or if you don’t care about using your PC as a tablet — you might indeed prefer one of those other models, both of which weigh less than the Surface Book.
Also, most competing Windows laptops start somewhere below $1,499 — often well below. So, you know, they have that going for them too.
That said, there are a couple Windows models that come a little closer to competing with the Surface Book. One is Dell’s redesigned XPS 15. Yes, it’s bigger than the Surface Book, and has a fixed screen, which means you can’t use it as a tablet. But at 3.9 pounds, it’s in the same ballpark as Microsoft’s laptop, and with a compact footprint more in line with 14-inch notebooks, it’s not that much bigger than the 13.5-inch Surface Book. Also, it has the potential to perform like the Surface. Although the entry-level $1,000 model has plain ol’ integrated graphics, the top-end configuration packs a sixth-gen Core i7 processor, color-accurate 4K screen, 16GB of RAM, a 2GB NVIDIA 960M GPU and a 1TB PCIe SSD. Battery life there is rated at up to 17 hours with a lower-res 1080p screen, but even with that top-end SKU, you’re still looking at around 11 hours, according to Dell.

You also might want to consider Lenovo’s just-announced Yoga 900 ($1,200 and up), which replaces last year’s Yoga 3 Pro. At 2.8 pounds, it’s considerably lighter than the Surface Book, and can also be used in tablet mode, but it, too, is offered with sixth-gen Core i5 and i7 processors, a similar 3,200 x 1,800 screen and up to 512GB of storage. The trade-off seems to be that in exchange for a thinner and lighter design, you get shorter battery life (up to nine hours, says Lenovo) and no discrete graphics.
And, of course, there’s the machine against which Microsoft itself is comparing the Surface Book: the MacBook Pro. Let’s stick with the 13-inch Retina display MBP, which starts at $1,299 and weighs a similar 3.48 pounds. At that price, it comes with a Core i5 processor, 8GB of RAM, a 128GB SSD, Intel Iris 6100 graphics and a 12-hour battery, although you can also configure it with a 1TB solid-state drive. Other than that, though, Apple has saved its best specs for the 15-inch MacBook Pro, including discrete graphics and a quad-core Core i7 option. There’s nothing wrong with the larger model, except at 4.49 pounds it’s far heavier than the Surface Book. Either way, it has no touchscreen and can’t be used as anything other than a clamshell laptop. Similar to what I said earlier, if you want something that can double as a tablet, you’re likely to ignore the MacBook Pro, regardless of the size.
Wrap-up

The Surface Book isn’t perfect — no product is. But if “the ultimate laptop” merely means it raises the bar for other laptops, then it mostly lives up to that promise. I would recommend it based on its long battery life alone — 11 hours at a minimum. Even if you consider the detachable screen little more than a party trick, you still get a well-built laptop with unmatched runtime and performance options that most other 13-inch systems simply don’t offer. Because the screen is detachable, too, it’s more comfortable to use as a 1.6-pound tablet than all of those Yoga-like PCs are with their screens flipped back. It’s just a shame about the Surface Book’s battery life in tablet mode — it’s comfortable to use, but you won’t last long without a power cord.
There will, naturally, be people who don’t need the option of discrete graphics or 16GB of RAM, and there will also be folks who just want a traditional laptop, and not necessarily a laptop/tablet mashup. For those people, there are other PCs that are lighter, cheaper or both. Machines like the Dell XPS 13, which is still one of my favorites. Otherwise, I highly recommend the Surface Book, especially to people who value performance, battery life and design above all else, even if it means you don’t get the lightest-possible machine. You’ll pay dearly for such a machine, of course, but that will be true of any halo product.
Ultimately, though, I wonder if Microsoft’s true no-compromise device is yet to come. The original promise of the Surface has always been to combine the best of a tablet and laptop. Both the Surface Book and the Surface Pro attempt to do that: While the former is surprisingly comfortable to use as a tablet, the latter has gotten steadily more powerful over the years, not to mention easier to type with or use in the lap. As it stands, the two devices serve different purposes, but they also appear to be moving in a similar direction. I would one day like to see a laptop with the Surface Book’s build quality, battery life and performance, just a little lighter and with better endurance as a standalone tablet. For now, the Surface Book is at its best as a laptop, which really is the whole point.
ICYMI: Insect robot for kids, paralysis fixed and more
![]()
Today on In Case You Missed It: We are covering the drone guideline news from the FAA the only way we know how: With some silly videos and real ones as well, like the Google X drone delivery test video — all to warn you all that UAV regulations are finally coming. A new Kickstarter for a toy insect robot comes with origami-like assembly, to teach kids about coding and engineering. And scientists at Ohio’s Case Western Reserve University have electronically bridged a gap between a paralyzed person’s spinal column and arms using brain wave sensors, in effect letting him use his arms once again.
In case you hadn’t heard, Giphy just launched a GIFmaker service that makes creating gifs from video clips easy to do.
If you come across any interesting videos, we’d love to see them. Just tweet us with the #ICYMI hashtag @engadget or @mskerryd.
Starbucks’ store of the future bets on tech, luxury and alcohol
Starbucks stores are designed to feel welcoming and instantly familiar. In most locations, you know exactly what to do — a long bar sits against one of the walls and you slowly work your way down, explaining your order, paying and finally waiting for your chosen beverage(s) at the end. Not so in London’s Starbucks Reserve Bar. A first for Europe, this new establishment on Upper St. Martin’s Lane uses technology to radically change the in-store experience. For starters, there are only a couple of traditional cash registers — Starbucks has given tablets to a handful of staff instead, which they can use to take your order from anywhere inside the store. The company hopes this will reduce queue times and also create a more “open” atmosphere in the bar. If you’re an iPhone user, you can also use Mobile Order & Pay in the Starbucks app to complete an order at any time.
Slideshow-332212
The Reserve Bar’s interior design is refreshingly different too. It’s split into two halves, with the bulk of the seating on the left-hand side and an open kitchen on the right. Food is freshly prepared in store and the baristas will talk you through Starbucks’ luxurious Reserve brews, which include the Piccino (a Ristretto double shot espresso) and Americano Con Crema (an espresso blended with orange Piloncillo syrup and finished with coffee spiced foam infused with cinnamon). The atmosphere inside is unlike most Starbucks stores, emphasising the discovery of new coffee and slower, relaxed conversations.
If you’re the type that jumps into Starbucks just to charge your phone or use the normally reliable WiFi, the Reserve Bar has got you covered too. The tables are littered with wireless charging points; just grab an appropriate connector from the stand, plug it into your phone and line up the circular handle. There are enough around the store that you shouldn’t find yourself tussling for specific seats, and they’re spread out so that you won’t see a huddle of smartphone addicts huddled in a corner of the room. The store also boasts “ultra-fast” WiFi with speeds of up to 100Mbps — a first for its European stores, Starbucks claims. The network certainly seemed snappy while I was browsing on my laptop, although in fairness there were only a handful of other journalists to really stress-test the network.

Look around and you’ll notice a few of the other technology-fuelled delights. There are no paintings or photographs on the walls — Starbucks uses a projector to cast a handful of different images above the bar. The large menu near the entrance is actually a screen, and it updates automatically depending on the time of day. None of these integrations are a world-first, but they’re done tastefully and give Starbucks an upmarket appearance.
The Reserve Bar is also the first licensed Starbucks store in London, meaning you can order wine and beer up until 9pm. Few people think of Starbucks as a place where you can stop and socialise for an evening — you might chat with a friend over coffee, but it’s not the sort of establishment where most people like to waste away an entire evening. But that’s the new image Starbucks seems to be shooting for here — the Reserve Bar can be a quick coffee stop, sure, but it’s also somewhere to grab lunch, dinner or casual drinks.

Technology is just one part of the pitch. The Reserve Bar is currently a concept store and the company is staying hush-hush about whether it’ll be replicated elsewhere. It’s certainly a departure from the established Starbucks formula, and it could be a glimpse into the company’s future — if it feels it needs to do more than sell grande cappuccinos.
23andMe given permission to offer some limited health reports
23andMe has been given the green light to resume some, but not all, of the health reporting that the FDA prohibited it from carrying out in 2013. The startup launched with the pitch that a sample of your saliva was enough to tell you where your ancestors came from as well as if you would go bald in old age. Controversially, the company also told you if you were at risk of a wide variety of diseases, but never asked for permission to do so. That’s why regulators shut it down, since the outfit was unable to supply the data to prove that the tests were accurate.
The New York Times is reporting that 23andMe has now made nice with the FDA, but as part of the deal, can only offer limited but proven tests concerning carrier status. This is where you screen a person’s genes looking for mutations like sickle cell anaemia or cystic fibrosis that could be passed down if they had children. As the paper points out, however, this isn’t an uncommon test and can be taken with several other labs across the country.
23andMe founder Susan Wojcicki hasn’t given up hope of restoring her company’s original testing plan if she can satisfy the FDA that it’s reliable and accurate. In many ways, it’s becoming an incidental part of the business, since the firm is now using its growing database for drug development and discovery. At the start of the year, a deal was signed that gave researchers at Pfizer access to the genetic records of consenting users, opening up a pile of new data that could, one day, be used to build new treatments.
[Image Credit: nosha/Flickr]
Source: NYT
‘Back to the Future Part II’: science fiction vs. reality
If you came of age in the late ’80s, there’s a good chance that Back to the Future Part II was a formative film that helped inform your idea of what society might look like in the not-too-distant future. BTTF creators Bob Gale and Robert Zemeckis certainly weren’t trying to predict the future as much as they were trying to build a world that worked with their story. And in fact, the entire trilogy features less than 40 minutes of time in 2015. But that doesn’t mean this limited glimpse at the future wasn’t thrilling and hilarious to moviegoers in 1989. Now, it’s just fun to look back and see what, if anything, they got right — particularly today, the day that Marty and Dr. Emmett L. Brown traveled forward in time to. We can now finally judge how the fictional world of Hill Valley in 2015 matches up with reality.
All images courtesy Screencapped.net
Flying cars

Let’s get the big one out of the way first: No, we’re not even close to the flying-car technology seen in Back to the Future Part II. Where we’re going, we still need roads, unless we’re torturing ourselves with commercial air flight. The good news is that while our cars are still strictly land-based, they’re becoming increasingly less reliant on gasoline.
The Mr. Fusion system that powers the DeLorean’s time-travel capabilities with garbage in the second and third BTTF films shows that Gale and Zemeckis were thinking about alternative energy, but we don’t know what the main power source for 2015’s flying cars is. Here in reality, electric vehicles are becoming more commonplace and getting better every year. Couple the advances Tesla is making with hydrogen-powered cars like the Toyota Mirai and there’s no question our automotive technology has made great leaps since 1985.

A car that’s only emission is water is a lot more important to the future of transportation than one that can fly above traffic. And that’s not even mentioning self-driving cars, technology that could make driving a lot safer than it is today — there’s no sign of any such vehicles in the BTTF universe at all. There’s still no word on replacing our ancient license plates with barcoded versions, however.
Hoverboards

If flying cars were the most iconic part of Back to the Future Part II‘s vision of 2015, hoverboards are right behind them for capturing our imagination. The hoverboard that Marty “borrows” from a little girl ends up being an essential tool for many of his adventures over the second and third films — he wouldn’t have gotten back to 1985 without it. Hoverboards aren’t commonplace toys yet like they are in the film, but they’re getting a lot closer to being a reality. Lexus showed off a prototype recently, and last year we got to take a $10,000 hoverboard out for a spin. For now, we’ll just have to keep hoping that hoverboards make it to the mainstream sooner than later.
Fashion

Much like hoverboards, the fashion tech in reality hasn’t quite caught up with Back to the Future Part II just yet. Marty’s self-lacing Nikes were easily the most memorable future fashion shown off in the movie. Nike tried to capture that magic back in 2011 with a pair of Nike MAGs that didn’t lace themselves, but there have been plenty of rumors about a self-lacing pair actually being released this year. Future day has arrived and Nike hasn’t yet dropped that bombshell, so we’re still waiting for this one to come true.

People generally are dressing a lot less outlandishly in reality than they do in the film, no big surprise there. In a lot of ways, the fashion of BTTF‘s 2015 just takes a lot of the worst tendencies of ’80s fashion and draws it out to its logical conclusion. Marty’s future outfit is a bit of an exception — sure, his self-drying and self-fitting jacket has a number of futuristic technological and fashion touches, but it’s otherwise pretty tame compared to what everyone else around him is wearing. Even though we don’t have self-drying clothing yet, there have been numerous advances in high-tech fabrics that let clothing wick moisture away, dry quickly and breathe or stretch more than ever before. Anyone who spends lots of time outside for fitness or recreation has likely benefited from the advances in clothing technology we’ve seen over the last 30 years.
Eyewear

Google Glass may have crashed and burned thus far, but there’s still plenty of interest in augmented reality and virtual reality here in the real world. The same goes for Back to the Future‘s 2015. Doc sports a sort of digital binoculars that overlay data on top of the display, and he also wears a pair of opaque metallic shades while flying that seem like they should block his vision — but they don’t.
Marty’s kids both wear some sort of augmented reality goggles when hanging around their home (even at the dinner table!). We don’t get a lot of details on what exactly those goggles are for — all we know is that Marty Jr. answers a video call on them before sending the call to his dad on the living room TV screen. Furthermore, video calling seems entirely commonplace in BTTF‘s 2015. It seems like the default way of communicating, with voice-only calls apparently phased out for the most part. Of course, video calling is quite popular here in the real 2015, but we’re even more addicted to text-only communication at this point.
In the home

Video calling is far from the only forward-looking technology in Marty and Jennifer McFly’s future home — there are plenty of other smart home innovations that should sound familiar. It starts at the front door, where your thumbprint is used to enter instead of a doorknob. We may still mostly use locks and keys, but you can get your hands on a doorknob and lock that you can open with your finger. Marty’s home also adjusts the lights and temperature for him when he enters, something similar to what many smart home systems promise.
Perhaps the thing that’s most notable around the McFly household is how much voice control has been integrated into the home. The TV, phone, lights, air conditioning, kitchen appliances and more all respond to human speech. We’re getting there with Siri, Cortana, Google Now, Alexa and all the rest, but we’re still not quite to the point where we can just bark commands from anywhere in the home and expect our wishes to be granted.
The house also features a “video shade” over the windows that projects whatever sort of image you want outside. Not something we have yet (nor something that makes a whole lot of sense), but we do sometimes Chromecast fireplace scenes to our TVs. It’s not all that different. Marty’s kitchen is also advanced in some ways that we don’t have, most notably the food rehydrator that takes a tiny little pizza and blows it up to a fully cooked pie in just a few seconds.

Marty’s son vegges out with a giant flat-screen TV before dinner, something that’s pretty commonplace in many homes around the world now. However, most of us don’t try to binge-watch six channels at a time, fortunately. (Although you could argue we’re just distracted in different ways, with plenty of people multitasking on other screens while they watch TV.) One staple in the McFly household that is definitely not a factor in the real 2015 is the fax machine. For some reason, their house has multiple fax machines all over the house — even in the closet.

Life in 2015
Back to the Future Part II is filled with plenty of other small tidbits about life in 2015, some of which I surely wish were real. Doc notes that the justice system is incredibly fast and efficient now because they abolished all lawyers, something that makes me wonder just what other massive changes to the justice system may have taken place. Weather forecasts are even better and more efficient as well, with up-to-the-second predictions routinely coming true. It’s something that causes Doc to wish that the post office were as efficient as the weather service. It sounds like the good old USPS is just as maligned in the BTTF universe as it is here.

When it comes to pop culture, BTTF does a good job at predicting the sequel-itis that plagues Hollywood — a giant 3D ad for Jaws 19 nearly scares Marty out of his self-lacing shoes. We’re fortunate not to have 19 Jaws films, but Robert Downey Jr. has played Iron Man in six different movies in the last seven years or so. And we’re in the middle of a world in which reboots on film and TV are incredibly commonplace. The idea of Jaws 19 doesn’t seem so laughable now.
One thing we can sadly say has definitely not come true yet is a World Series victory for the Chicago Cubs — although this could be the year. Marty sees a new reel claiming the Cubs won over a team from Miami for its first title in well over 100 years. While Gale and Zemeckis did predict the existence of a team in Miami, the Marlins and Cubs both play in the National League, making it impossible for them to play each other in the World Series. Additionally, the Cubs are currently down to the Mets in the National League Championship Series, and the World Series hasn’t even started yet. We’ll give the BTTF team a pass on not realizing that the baseball season would somehow get even longer in the last 26 years. Still, there’s hope that the Cubs could make the craziest part of this prediction come true — but the team will have to step up its game to do so.

[Image credits: Screencapped.net]









