Skip to content

Archive for

20
Oct

AT&T scoops up Kyocera Hydro Air for GoPhone plans


kyocera_hydro_air_masthead-phone

AT&T is now selling the waterproof Kyocera Hydro Air as part of its GoPhone prepaid service. Priced $99, the phone runs Android 5.1 Lollipop and features a 5-inch qHD (960×540 pixel) display.

The Hydro Air is IP57 rated, meaning it can withstand sitting in up to 3 feet of water for up to 30 minutes. Powered by a 1.2GHz quad-core processor, other specs include a 5-megapixel rear camera, 1GB RAM, and 8GB internal storage. Users who need more space for media such as pictures and music can take advantage of the microSD expansion card slot for up to 32GB.

The Hydro Air offers gloved and wet-finger tracking so it will work even in the rain or when you’re just hopping out of the pool. Rounding things out, the phone includes a 2300mAh non-removable battery.

AT&T GoPhone rate plans are $45 per month for 1.5GB of data or $60 per month for 4GB of data. Customers can save $5 each month with Auto Pay.

Purchase the Kyocera Hydro Air for AT&T though Walmart for $99.

The post AT&T scoops up Kyocera Hydro Air for GoPhone plans appeared first on AndroidGuys.

20
Oct

LG and Samsung unveil new battery tech for future wearables


galaxy round spare battery

LG and Samsung have been showing off a selection of new flexible battery cells designed for wearable products at an exhibition in Seoul today. Given the limited space inside wearable products and the long life time demanded from smartwatch consumers, new battery technologies are seen as a key to help drive the market forward.

Samsung SDI unveiled two new types of flexible batteries, a stripe and a band. The stripe battery is just 0.3mm thin and is built from a flexible fibre that enables the cell to bend. This cell is designed for use in very small, thin wearables, such as a necklace, hair band or bracelet. Samsung also has a band-type battery designed for smartwatches, presumably in the wrist band, that can add up to 50 additional battery capacity compared with current designs and can resist over 50,000 bends.

LG Wire Battery

LG Chem showcased its own wire battery technology again at the event, which was originally shown off back in 2013. The wire battery can be bent in half without breaking. The company’s hexagonal battery for smartwatches, which was unveiled earlier in the year, was also on display. This design can potentially double the battery capacity of smartwatches by making better use of the space available inside products.


LG Chem hexagonal batterySee also: LG hexagonal batteries improve smartwatch battery life7

Samsung’s and LG’s battery divisions are looking to design power cells for the next generation of wearables, as shipments are expected to surpass the 100 million mark in 2020, according to Gartner. Lower performance wearables, such has fitness trackers, have actually proven more popular than expensive smartwatches, which are expected to account for 40 percent of smart wrist devices by 2016, and these thin battery technologies could enable new form factors and products in these categories.

20
Oct

Deal: build robots and more with the Raspberry Pi Hacker Bundle (last chance) and the Raspberry Pi 2 Starter Kit


Raspberry-Pi-2-IMG_1510

Getting into hardware, programming and building technology sounds intimidating. Surely, only engineers can do that kind of stuff, right? Well, not really. Coding is definitely a skill that needs to be worked on, but there are tools that can make your learning process smooth and enjoyable. Today we have a couple deals from the AA Deals Store for those of you who like to fiddle with technology.

One of them is a Raspberry Pi course bundle, while the second deal offers the necessary hardware to get yourself started. Let’s jump right in!

The Complete Raspberry Pi 2 Starter Kit

Have you ever heard of the Raspberry Pi 2 (here’s our review)? This thing is pretty much a tiny computer that allows developers, robot builders and gadget makers to tap into a whole world of digital possibilities. You can use it to build robots, create wearables, put together IoT devices and much more.

raspberry-pi-intro

Want to join the fun? the Complete Raspberry Pi 2 Starter Kit offers everything you need to get started with your tech tinkering. For only $115, you can put your name to a Raspberry Pi 2 Model B, a Quick Starter Kit and a set of courses for learning the basics of working with this platform.

Buy the Complete Raspberry Pi 2 Starter Kit

Raspberry Pi Hacker Bundle

Is there not enough knowledge in the previous deal? You can super-size your package by getting the super affordable Raspberry Pi Hacker Bundle. This one is a set of courses that will help you further polish your Raspberry Pi skills. Here’s what it includes:

  • Introduction to Raspberry Pi – Enter the World of Coding & Hardware with This Miniature Computer ($199 value)
  • Hardware Projects Using Raspberry Pi – Utilize Raspberry Pi as a Tool for Learning Physical Computing ($199 value)
  • Python Programming for Beginners – Conquer This Beginner-Friendly Programming Language ($99 value)
  • Real World Guide to Hardware Design – Get Expert Tips & Tricks for Designing Hardware with Ease ($99 value)
  • PiBot: Build Your Own Raspberry Pi-Powered Robot – Experiment with Raspberry Pi & Bring a Small, Mobile Robot to Life ($29 value)

f06845e6d52e08244bc1f680fa9fe714a166c39b_main_hero_image

By the way, all of those courses can be had for only $39! But hurry, because this one happens to be a last chance offer. The deal ends this Wednesday.

Buy the Raspberry Pi Hacker Bundle

20
Oct

HTC wants another shot: watch their One A9 event here


HTC-Logo-3 (1)

Folks at HTC probably would probably like to forget the M9 ever existed. A disastrous mix of bad reputation and some very real flaws have crippled the M9, and with it, HTC as a whole. The company is a ghost of its former self, but it’s not ready to walk into the light just yet.

Today, HTC is trying again. More importantly, it’s trying something new. The One A9 is a real departure from the M9 (and its various lookalikes), though you will probably still experience a case of déjà vu. Yes, the One A9 looks like Apple’s iPhone, and HTC isn’t ashamed of it. In fact, CEO Cher Wang was open about HTC’s intention to create a “worthy alternative” to the iPhone.

Regardless how you feel of the design of the A9, the specs will likely elicit a weaker response. Rumors talk about a mid-range affair, and hopefully, the One A9’s price tag will reflect that.

HTC will be livestreaming the One A9 launch event in about 2.5 hours, and we will be bringing you our in-depth coverage as soon as we can. You can watch the live stream right here, starting from:

  • 9AM San Francisco
  • 12PM New York
  • 5PM London
  • 6PM Berlin
  • 9:30 New Delhi
  • 1AM Tokyo
  • 3AM Sydney

Excited for the One A9? Let us know your thoughts!

20
Oct

Blind Camera Shootout – the winner is…


big-smartphone-camera-shootout

If you’ve been following the homepage over the past week, you’ll have seen we published a big blind smartphone camera shootout to find out how the new Sony Xperia Z5 camera compares to the iPhone 6S, Galaxy Note 5 and the LG G4. Like our past blind camera shootout, we didn’t tell you which device took each image and today, we’re revealing the results – which smartphones takes the crown?

The cameras in numbers…

Before we reveal the results, let’s recap the various camera specs of each smartphone:

  Sony Xperia Z5 Galaxy Note 5 LG G4 Apple iPhone 6S
Resolution: 23MP (5520×4140) 16MP (5312×2988) 16MP (5312×2988) 12MP (4032×3024)
Focus: Hybrid AF Autofocus Laser Autofocus Phase Detection AF
Flash: dual LED dual LED dual LED dual LED
Manual controls? Yes Yes Yes partial
Aperture: f/2.0 f/1.9 f/1.8 f/2.2
Focal Length: 24mm 28mm 28mm 29mm
Camera Sensor Size: 1/2.3″ 1/2.6″ 1/2.6″ 1/3″
Pixel Size: TBC 1.12µm 1.12µm 1.22µm
Stabilisation:
Features:
Effective
Stabilisation
OIS OIS
Colour Spectrum Sensor
Digital Image
Stabilisation
Front Camera 5MP 5MP 8MP 5MP

Numbers are only one part of the equation and while you could make a decision on which is best just based on the specs, we all know that cameras and images are about more than megapixels, and algorithms and processing play a large part. Clear your mind, settle down and let’s check out which smartphone camera really is the best.

The Galleries:

Let’s take a look at each gallery again and discuss which smartphone took the best shot. Before we do that however, it’s time to reveal which device is which:

  • Phone A = Sony Xperia Z5
  • Phone B = LG G4
  • Phone C = Apple iPhone 6S
  • Phone D = Samsung Galaxy Note 5

Now, let’s look through the galleries:

Gallery 1

Blind-Camera-Shootout1-EOS

This shootout proved to be interesting as it tested how each smartphone camera handled the change between a colour-rich subject and a sky with various shades of grey. No smartphone was able to capture the sky in all its details but the iPhone 6S seemed to handle the transition between light and dark the best.

#gallery-1
margin: auto;

#gallery-1 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-1 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-1 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 2

Blind-Camera-Shootout2-EOS

This gallery combined an interesting collection of tests; from the varying sky colours to the detail of the individual tree leaves, the sign in the foreground and the building details and colours to the right.

The Note 5 wins this test as it handles the sky well, produces a good amount of detail in the sign and has clarity in the tree outline. The LG G4 and the Xperia Z5 come second and third respectively as they both produce good all round images while the iPhone 6S comes fourth as it overcompensates for the white balance in the image.

#gallery-2
margin: auto;

#gallery-2 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-2 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-2 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 3

Blind-Camera-Shootout3-EOS

This gallery was designed to see how each smartphone handles the details and colours in and on the shop front as well as the details in the shop signs and the reflections in the windows.

The Xperia Z5 wins this shootout as it produces a saturated image with deep colours that is closest the image produced by the EOS 70D. Next up is the Galaxy Note 5, which slightly overcompensates for the light but still captures details, while the iPhone 6S comes third and the washed out LG G4 rounds off this gallery.

#gallery-3
margin: auto;

#gallery-3 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-3 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-3 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 4

Blind-Camera-Shootout4-EOS

As pointed out in the comments on the original shootout, the wide angle of the Xperia Z5 lets it down here. When evaluating this gallery, we zoomed into the Apostrophe sign, the detail on the ladies’ hair and the grille at the end of this feature.

The winner is the LG G4, which handles the range of colours better than its rivals. The others are quite close with the Xperia Z5 adding a slight hue to an otherwise good image, the iPhone 6S handling the colours in the scene quite well and the Galaxy Note 5 offering impressive detail even if colours are a little saturated.

#gallery-4
margin: auto;

#gallery-4 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-4 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-4 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 5

Blind-Camera-Shootout5-EOS

This gallery was an interesting test as it evaluated how each smartphone handled the colours in the two different LED signs, as well as the detail of the door stand, which can be seen just past the front door.

Each smartphone handled the scene differently and the winner is the Galaxy Note 5, which comes closest to the EOS 70D image with detail and accurate colours throughout. Next up is the iPhone 6S which offers great colour reproduction in the signs and this is followed by the LG G4. The Xperia Z5 brings up the rear as it over compensates for the light and hence, the signs are almost washed out.

#gallery-5
margin: auto;

#gallery-5 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-5 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-5 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 6

Blind-Camera-Shootout7-EOS

While shots of scenery and subjects are always great, it doesn’t quite cover how each smartphone handles the contours and detail of a human face. This gallery aims to test just this as well as looking at the amount of bokeh in the details on the wall and mirror behind.

This proved to be a test of two halves with the Galaxy Note 5 narrowly beating the LG G4 to the top spot followed by the Xperia Z5 narrowly pushing the iPhone 6S into last place. In particular, the Xperia Z5 would have probably done a lot better had it been in oversampling mode and the iPhone 6S seems to get the white balance all wrong.

#gallery-6
margin: auto;

#gallery-6 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-6 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-6 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 7

Blind-Camera-Shootout8-EOS

For this gallery, the blue sky and amount of detail in the buildings was an interesting test of how good each smartphone’s HDR mode was. From the detail in the rooftops to the Breitling sign at the bottom of the scene and the Itsu sign in the immediate foreground, there’s a lot of detail to capture.

The iPhone 6S wins this with the Galaxy Note 5 very close behind as the sky is a little less saturated than on Apple’s flagship. The Xperia Z5 comes third over the LG G4, mainly because the latter produced a darker image and Sony managed to more accurately reproduce the colour of the sky.

#gallery-7
margin: auto;

#gallery-7 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-7 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-7 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 8

Blind-Camera-Shootout9-EOS

Almost the same scene as the above, this gallery used the red telephone box as the subject of the photo. When evaluating this, we looked for reproduction of details on and in the box, the clarity of the Itsu shop sign to the left and the amount of bokeh in the background details.

The Galaxy Note 5 wins this just for its reproduction of details inside the iconic telephone box while the LG G4 and the iPhone 6S tie for second, as the latter captures the details in the background better and the former is better at reproducing the white balance of the scene. Sony’s Xperia Z5 comes a very close fourth as a seeming lack of stabilisation results in some noise in the image.

#gallery-8
margin: auto;

#gallery-8 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-8 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-8 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 9

Blind-Camera-Shootout10-EOS

This was an interesting test as the flags had varying amounts of detail, the buildings were detailed and intricate and the sky can be just seen to the left. The Xperia Z5 has a good reproduction of the overall scene but lacks detail when you zoom into the image.

The LG G4 captures the scene well and captures good detail of the brickwork on the building while the iPhone 6S is slightly darker but does better at capturing the sky. The Galaxy Note 5 is very similar to the LG G4 as it captures the scene well including details in the brickwork but lacks depth when you zoom into the image even slights. It’s too close to call a winner in this gallery.

#gallery-9
margin: auto;

#gallery-9 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-9 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-9 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 10

Blind-Camera-Shootout12-EOS

This was an interesting gallery as it kicked off the low light testing with a combination of varying colours, intricate detail and bright lights. The Galaxy Note 5 probably wins this for the amount of detail captured even though the colour reproduction isn’t quite accurate.

Beyond this, the LG G4 comes second for the amount of detail captured and even though it is slightly noisy, the Xperia Z5 comes third with the iPhone 6S last thanks to inaccurate white balance. Interestingly, the Xperia Z5 would probably win this or come very close when used in oversampling mode.

#gallery-10
margin: auto;

#gallery-10 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-10 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-10 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 11

Blind-Camera-Shootout13-EOS

A combination a dark shop sign and a low light cream building above made an interesting test of each smartphone’s ability to handle low light conditions. The Xperia Z5 overcompensated for a lack of light resulting in a bright image but a lack of detail in the overall image.

The Galaxy Note 5 and the LG G4 tie for first place here as the overall image is almost identical from each of these devices and the iPhone 6S completely misjudges the white balance resulted in a dark image that fails to capture all the details.

#gallery-11
margin: auto;

#gallery-11 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-11 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-11 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 12

Blind-Camera-Shootout14-EOS

The last two galleries combine to form a test of the overall night shot capability of each handset. The first gallery is the scene captured with no flash and the second gallery takes the same scene but applies the inbuilt flash of each device.

As far as details in the image go, the Xperia Z5 is the best of all four devices as, although the iPhone 6S produces a lighter image, Sony’s best captures more details. The Galaxy Note 5 comes third and the LG G4 comes fourth, although it’s worth noting that the ISO is set quite low on both of these devices (although all handsets were set to auto mode) and they would produce much better images with a higher ISO.

#gallery-12
margin: auto;

#gallery-12 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-12 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-12 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 13

Blind-Camera-Shootout15-EOS

Now to the final gallery – which smartphone has the strongest and most accurate flash? The EOS 70D has a significant advantage thanks to its Xenon flash and while companies such as Nokia have used Xenon in the past, a dual/triple LED flash is the common standard as it can be used for both photos and videos (Xenon cannot be used while video recording).

The LG G4 and the Galaxy Note 5 tie for first place here as the former reproduces details better (albeit with a slight hue) while the latter captures the light better but lacks somewhat in the details. Sony’s Xperia Z5 comes a close third and the iPhone 6S rounds off this shootout in a lowly fourth place.

The results:

Now to the results – which device wins the shootout? Here’s how the voting stands at the end of this shootout:

(function ()
var opst = document.createElement(‘script’);
var os_host = document.location.protocol == “https:” ? “https:” : “http:”;
opst.type = ‘text/javascript’;
opst.async = true;
opst.src = os_host + ‘//’ + ‘www.opinionstage.com/polls/2300099/embed.js’;
(document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0] ());

It turned out to be quite a close-run race between the iPhone 6S and the Galaxy Note 5 for the title but Apple’s latest just beat Samsung’s latest with 38.2 and 34.1 percent of the 7810 votes respectively. Sony’s Xperia Z5 comes in third with 17.7 percent of votes while the LG G4 brings up the rear with 10 percent of all the votes.

The phones in detail…

.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;

.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;

.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;

@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;

@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;

body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;

body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;

As mentioned in the original gallery post, all the settings were at their maximum resolution, which proved to be detrimental to the Xperia Z5 (which relies on the 8MP oversampling mode for its best shots). We’ll be retesting these smartphones along with a few others in the big camera shootout in the coming weeks so stay tuned! Let us know what you thought about these results in the comments below guys and head over to the original shootout post for all the galleries.

20
Oct

ARM announces Mali-470 GPU, halves power consumption of the Mali-400


ARM-logo

Today, ARM has announced its new Mali-470 GPU, which is designed primarily for the wearables and Internet-of-Things markets. The GPU is the successor to the hugely popular Mali-400 GPU found powering a range of entry-level smartphones and smartwatches.

The major advancement with the Mali-470 is that is consumes roughly half the power of the Mali-400, making it an even better fit for scenarios with limited battery capacities and particularly strict thermal limits, such as wearables. Performance remains consistent with the Mali-400, meaning that these extra energy savings are not coming at the expense of raw grunt.

Mali-470 normalized energy efficiencyARM has updated the GPU’s Vertex Processor and Fragment Processor designs to make the energy efficiency savings. Microarchitecture improvements have also been made to make more aggressive use of clock gating and block bypassing. Scaling up to larger core configurations also continues to make use of power gating for advanced thermal and power management.

Just like the Mali-400, the Mali-470 scales up from one to four pixel processors for additional performance. The Mali 450 chip in the range can be scaled up to eight cores, if a product developer need to display content at a higher resolution.

If the Mali-400 range sounds familiar to smartphone users, the Utgard architecture originally powered older Android handsets and can be found in mid-range SoCs such as the octa-core MT6592. It turns out that this graphics technology is pretty well suited to the lower power requirements of wearables. Midgard is ARM’s latest architecture for higher performance Mali GPUs, such as its T-760, found in high-end smartphones like the Galaxy S6, and the recently announced T-880.

As a result of the redesign, the Mali-470 can squeeze into a slightly smaller die area size than the Mali-400 as well, depending on how silicon partners decide to design the chip. ARM envisions the new GPU paired up with its efficient Cortex-A7 or A53 CPU designs for a low-power SoC.

Mali-470 evolution

In terms of target products, the Mali-470 is designed for a range of relatively low power applications, including wearables, home electronics and automotive that make use of a graphics user interface. To support this, the Mali-470 works with OpenGL ES 2.0 and 1.1, the minimum requirement for Android Wear. While OpenGL ES 3.0 may be newer, the additional features aren’t worth the extra power requirements that they would place on the GPU’s hardware design, especially as the Mali-470 is aimed primarily for use in GUI oriented situations. OpenGL ES 2.0 is already widely used in these type of products, so swapping a chip into designs should be relatively straight forward.

As with all chip releases, there is some time to wait until the Mali-470 makes it way into consumer products. ARM expects that the first silicon partners could have SoCs using the new GPU ready by the end of 2016, which means that products could begin showing up sometime in the first half of 2017.

20
Oct

Google launches beta testing program for Search app on Android


If you’re the type to sign up for beta testing programs to get first access to upcoming features, then Google wants your help. Mountain View is looking for beta testers for Android’s Google Search app — Droid Life says the company has released a Now card looking for volunteers, but you can also join through the official Play page. Once you’re part of the program, you’ll get notified of new updates, as always, which you can get through Google Play. This time, though, you’re downloading features ahead of most people, some of which might never make it to general release. For first timers, know that a lot of things that go through beta testing are still buggy and unstable, so prepare to use features that still don’t work as intended.

Via: Droid Life

Source: Google Play

20
Oct

Social media users give UK storms the most British names ever


Lightning

Last month, the Met Office announced it would begin naming the storms that batter the UK and Ireland and asked social media users to put their suggestions in the hat. By giving them a moniker, the weather service hopes that people will track storms when they hit our rainy isles and raise awareness of their impact. That list has now been finalised, and as expected, we’ve done ourselves proud.

Introducing Abigail, Barney, Frank, Gertrude and Nigel. They’re just a handful of names that will be assigned to weather patterns that will potentially cause “medium” or “high” winds across the UK, Ireland or both. It starts with Abigail and will alternate between male and female names as it moves through the alphabet.

The winning names are as follows: Abigail, Barney, Clodagh, Desmond, Eva, Frank, Gertrude, Henry, Imogen, Jake, Katie, Lawrence, Mary, Nigel, Orla, Phil, Rhonda, Steve, Tegan, Vernon and Wendy. Q, U, X, Y and Z have been omitted in order to align with official storm naming in the US.

Tipsters were invited to get involved via Facebook, Twitter and email, although the final decision was made by the Met Office and Irish weather service Met Éireann. To qualify, winds must reach average speeds of between 55 and 63mph — only then will a storm take on the name of one of your friends’ grandparents.

[Image credit: Brian Tomlinson, Flickr]

Source: Met Office (Twitter)

20
Oct

LG’s much-improved G Vista 2 is coming to AT&T


LG G Vista 2

You’d be forgiven if you forgot about LG’s G Vista — the smartphone’s huge size couldn’t make up for the ridiculously low-res display and slow processor. You might just remember its sequel, though. AT&T has unveiled the G Vista 2, and it fixes just about every gripe you had from before. The 5.7-inch screen now touts a much more acceptable 1080p resolution, and the combination of an eight-core processor (unnamed, but likely a Snapdragon 615) with 2GB of RAM should keep up with most tasks. You’ll also get a handy stylus, a 13-megapixel rear camera, a 5-megapixel front cam and 16GB of expandable storage. AT&T hasn’t yet said when the G Vista 2 ships or how much it’ll cost you, but talk of a “revolutionary” price hints that you won’t be paying much of a premium over the phone’s predecessor.

Via: GSMArena

Source: AT&T (YouTube)

20
Oct

NY Times launches VR app with Google Cardboard giveaway


Inside Tokyo Game Show 2015

The New York Times is launching a VR app, and will give a million plus subscribers a Google Cardboard VR viewer to use it. It’ll also debut a VR film for the app called The Displaced, which details the struggles of three children caught in the global refugee crisis. Executive Editor Dean Baquet said the NYT “created the first critical, serious piece of journalism using virtual reality, to shed light on one of the most dire humanitarian crises of our lifetime.” The film is best viewed on Cardboard, but will also be available on YouTube and smartphones via a 2D version of the app.

The Times will release a series of VR films for the app, including an existing piece showing how it made the New York Times MagazineWalking New York cover. It said the app also “supports virtual reality playback for Google Cardboard as well as playback of 360-degree video mobile navigation.” Executive VP Meredith Kopit Levien said “the great irony here is that it takes (a 164-year old) print newspaper… and its still remarkable distribution system to deliver one of the most advanced digital storytelling technologies to more than a million people.”

The great irony here is that it takes (a 164-year old) print newspaper… and its still remarkable distribution system to deliver one of the most advanced digital storytelling technologies to more than a million people.

The Times advised subscribers to keep their Cardboards for subsequent releases coming in December and later. (If you’re a subscriber and not sure what we’re talking about, Google’s Cardboard is a fold out device that turns your smartphone into a basic virtual reality viewer, letting you see 3D and 360-degree videos.) The app will arrive on November 7th for Android and iOS, and subscribers will receive Cardboard with their weekend paper starting the same day. Times Insiders and some digital subscribers will instead get a promo code for the viewer, which normally runs about $25.

Source: New York Times