Skip to content

Archive for

3
Jul

Aukey 4-Port USB Car Charger, $14.99


Here’s a great solution to multiple devices and only one car charger port from Aukey. This 4-port car charger allows you to connect your tablet, phone and whatever other little gizmos you may be riding down the road with. Your price: $14.99.

http://ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&OneJS=1&Operation=GetAdHtml&MarketPlace=US&source=ss&ref=ss_til&ad_type=product_link&tracking_id=acc-of-day-20&marketplace=amazon&region=US&placement=B00LJK4HE0&asins=B00LJK4HE0&linkId=OEAGWQSV3SADQPHU&show_border=true&link_opens_in_new_window=true

Join Prime and get this deal with FREE two-day shipping!

The post Aukey 4-Port USB Car Charger, $14.99 appeared first on AndroidGuys.

3
Jul

How I learned to love Alexa (and Amazon’s Echo)


After the failure of the Fire Phone and the so-so Fire TV, it was hard to get excited about Amazon’s $180 Echo wireless speaker. At best, it seemed like a superfluous device that simply mimicked voice-powered tech from our phones in monolithic speaker form. At worst, it felt like yet another way for the company to insert itself into your life — all in an effort to make you buy more crap from Amazon. I’ll admit, I wasn’t in any rush to nab an Echo of my own after it was first announced (Prime members with a special invite were able to get it for $99). And, curiously, Amazon didn’t make review units available at the time, either. But now that Echo is widely available to everyone, I was finally able to get my hands on one to test out. Surprisingly enough, I ended up falling for it big time.

To be clear, I fell for Amazon’s virtual assistant Alexa. Sure, she’s just another spin on the likes of Siri, Cortana and Google Now (time for a friendlier name there, eh Google?), but Alexa also differs in a few key ways. For one, she’s always listening, and she generally does a better job of understanding me than other virtual assistants. Alexa also has the uncanny ability to hear me even when I’m on the other side of my living room, thanks to Echo’s seven microphones. That’s something I’ve never seen with any other virtual assistant. (I even have trouble getting Siri to wake up and accurately hear my voice on my Apple Watch — and that’s right on my wrist!)

All of this is due to Amazon’s unique approach with the Echo. It’s not a portable speaker like we’ve seen from Jambox and Logitech. Instead, it’s a rather large, cylindrical device that needs to be plugged into power. It’s something you’ll likely just leave in a single spot in your home. But what you give up in portability you gain in overall reliability, as Alexa is ready to listen to your commands at the drop of a hat. After all, it’s harder for battery-powered devices to always be ready for voice commands without slowly draining power (Motorola went to great lengths to make that possible on the Moto X).

As someone who’s tied to a smartphone, tablet or computer most of the day, it was tough for me to get the hang of the Echo initially. Most of its functionality, like asking for the weather, checking on my calendar or looking up facts, is comprised of things we’re all used to doing on plenty of other devices. But eventually, its hands-free access to information began to feel downright empowering. If I’m on the way out the door, or in the middle of making dinner, it’s far easier to shout commands to Alexa rather than try to activate Siri on my phone, or load up an app. Alexa is the first virtual assistant I’ve used that actually lives up to that title.

It also helps that learning to use the Echo involves far more delight than frustration. Alexa has her limits, of course, but she also ended up consistently surprising me with her capabilities. I learned that she could tune into my local NPR station just by asking her to “play WNYC,” which pulls in a stream from TuneIn. Once I linked my Pandora account (through the separate Echo mobile app), it was easy to start playing any of my saved radio stations, or any random Pandora channel. And Alexa never failed to resume whatever I had playing whenever I interrupted her to ask a question.

Echo also shines as a decent speaker for music listening. Amazon packed in a 2-inch tweeter, a 2.5-inch woofer and an elongated reflex port in Echo’s 9-inch tall frame, giving it enough power to fill a small room with distortion-free music. It’s certainly no match for a dedicated hi-fi setup, but it’s about on par with Bluetooth speakers in this price range, with thumping lows and crisp highs. Don’t expect it to capture the nuances of a good jazz or classical performance, though. Echo’s circular design is reminiscent of Logitech’s UE Boom lineup, allowing it to spit out sound in every direction.

You can connect Echo to any mobile device over Bluetooth, after which it’s recognized just like a typical Bluetooth speaker. There’s also some basic hands-free support, allowing you to use voice commands to have Alexa do things like pause and skip media tracks. Unfortunately, Echo doesn’t work as a speakerphone yet, but that’s something I’m hoping Amazon adds eventually. Its complex array of microphones and noise-canceling technology would make it pretty useful for phone calls.

On top of the functions mentioned above, Echo can also do things like set a timer or alarm; play music from your Amazon library, Prime Music and iHeartRadio; and play Audible audiobooks. Echo can also control WeMo and Philips Hue smart home devices, but I wasn’t able to test that functionality since my home isn’t very smart yet. You can also add items to a shopping list and even re-buy things from your shopping history with voice commands. To Amazon’s credit, Echo offers enough other compelling features that it doesn’t feel like a crass e-commerce Trojan horse in your home, lying in wait for your late-night impulse purchases.

I probably sound like a pretty big Echo fan by this point, but there are still things I hope Amazon improves on eventually. It’d be nice to be able to activate Echo with your own custom voice command, other than saying “Alexa” (or “Amazon,” which is just boring). Amazon also needs to add more services to make Echo more useful — it kills me there’s no Spotify support yet. And while I can understand why Echo has to be plugged in, it would still be nice to have a small battery built in to give us a few hours of portability. As much as I like Echo, its current $180 price tag (down from its original $199 non-Prime price) also seems pretty steep, especially when select Prime members were able to snag it for $99.

The good thing is that the company is constantly updating and improving Echo. I didn’t run into any of the voice-recognition issues that earlier reviewers saw, which makes me think Amazon wasn’t just twiddling its thumbs for the past few months.

Perhaps the biggest compliment I can give the Echo is that it just works in a way that Siri and Google Now don’t — at least, when it comes to actually listening to and understanding voice commands. Once it’s plugged in, you just need to learn the basic Alexa commands and you can start feeling like a pro Echo user. It’s also pretty clear that Amazon is committed to making Echo a compelling platform. It just announced a $100 million Alexa Fund to promote voice-powered apps, and it’s offering an SDK that will let developers bring their apps to the Alexa platform. Echo may have just seemed like a weird speaker gadget when it was first announced, but it might just end up being as transformational as the Kindle over the next few years.

Filed under: ,

Comments

3
Jul

Meizu MX5 can be pre-ordered worldwide via Gearbest


meizu_mx5_official_banner

Meizu this week announced its latest flagship, the MX5, and now it’s available to pre-order worldwide through online retailer Gearbest. The online retailer plans on shipping devices starting on August 1.

Keep in mind that while Meizu is selling the device relatively cheap, Gearbest has scaled up the price quite a bit at a whopping $398 USD over the $290 USD for the device in China. However, it’s the only way to get the device until Meizu expands the availability of the MX5.

Meizu’s MX5 features a 5.5-inch 1,920 x 1,080 Super AMOLED display, a 64-bit Octa-core MediaTek MT6795T CPU, 3GB of RAM, and 16, 32, or 64GB storage options. Additionally, you’ll find a 20.7-megapixel camera strapped on the back, a 3,150mAh battery, running its Flyme OS 4.5 atop of the latest flavor of Android, Lollipop.

Click here to view the embedded video.

You can pre-order the device in black, champagne, or white. If you’re interested, just hit the source link below.

e:sourc Gearbest

Come comment on this article: Meizu MX5 can be pre-ordered worldwide via Gearbest

3
Jul

Possible Google Glass successor spotted in FCC database


Google_Glass_with_frame

A new FCC filing for a device from Google that includes “GG1″ in its identifier has many thinking this may be version 2, or the consumer version, of Google Glass. There are not many details available, but a couple clues point to the device being some type of wearable.

The device will come with support for WiFi and Bluetooth LE, but at least for this filing, no wireless support. This seems to rule out a smartphone of any sort. The device will also have a non-removable battery.

According to the filing, the device’s FCC label will not be physically printed on the device. Although the filing does not reveal why that may be, a lack of space would be one explanation. Google indicates the FCC label will be provided as an “e-label” and a sample is provided. Appearing as white text on a black background, it is not a stretch to envision this e-label appearing on the Google Glass screen assuming the consumer version takes a similar form factor as the original Google Glass.

Earlier this year Google shut down its Glass Explorer Beta program and stopped making the original version available to interested consumers. The entire project was also moved out of Google X over to the Google Nest unit headed up by Tony Fadell in preparation for the next version. However, Google has been mostly silent regarding plans for Glass.

google_glass_2_elabel_possible

source: FCC
via: Phandroid

Come comment on this article: Possible Google Glass successor spotted in FCC database

3
Jul

MasterCard wants a selfie before approving your purchases online


mastercard visa cards

MasterCard is in the process of releasing a neat new way to help curve online purchasing fraud with selfies. With the new trend of mobile payment systems, being secure is also important. So first, let them take a selfie, then buy things online at your heart’s desire.

Ajay Bhalla, Chief Product Security Officer at MasterCard is pitching the idea of using the new fad of taking a selfie to enhance online purchase security when using a MasterCard at checkout. The basic premise of the idea is when you take a photo of your face it will use facial recognition software through your phone with the app they provide to confirm your identity and approve your purchase.

So lets say you have a hankering for a new a new toy on Amazon. Once you have figured out what toy you wanted, and are at the end of the checkout process on your computer, a notification will pop up on your phone from the MasterCard app. You then snap a selfie, the software confirms your identity, approves the purchase, then checkout will finalize on the computer. It’s not limited to facial scans, biometrics will be sufficient as well and you can choose to pick either method to verify your identity. Voice recognition is also in the works. So if you haven’t gotten ready yet, or feel like crap you can simply use the fingerprint scanner on your phone.

The pilot program for this process is limited to 500 customers; therefore, we won’t be able to use this just yet. Which means this is basically an experiment to see how well this will work. MasterCard is working with many cell phone manufacturers and providers (including Apple and Google), as well a couple banks to finalize the process.

For now, all we can do is wait and see what the results are.

Source: CNN Money

Come comment on this article: MasterCard wants a selfie before approving your purchases online

3
Jul

Samsung to release J1 Pop as the J1 Ace


samsung_galaxy_j1_ace_dutch

According to Dutch retailer NieuweMobiel.NL Samsung is changing the name on the planned J1 Pop Android phone to the J1 Ace. The original Samsung J1 was a low end android smartphone that started the “J” line of phones. So expect to be seeing similar lower end phones under that line.

We all know that flagship devices set the bar as far as expectations go so this should be no exception. This new variant seems to simply be an upgraded version of the J1. Although specs were not listed, it is priced higher than the J1 so that could be a big indicator as to how better it is over its predecessor; how ever incremental the improvements may be.

Currently it’s listed on the site for €114.95, ($127.59 USD with current exchange rates).

J1 Original Specs:

  • Android 4.4.4 (KitKat)
  • 4.3 inch screen (480 x 800 pixels)
  • Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
  • 4 GB Storage w/ 512 MB RAM
  • 5MP rear camera, 2MP FFC
  • 1850 mAh battery

If you were a fan of the J1, then keep a look out for any more info on the J1 Ace.

Source: NieuweMobiel.NL
Via: GSMArena

Come comment on this article: Samsung to release J1 Pop as the J1 Ace

3
Jul

Get your free Cardboard VR headset for the OnePlus 2 launch


cardboard-vr-headset-oneplus-header-image

OnePlus wants you to experience the launch of its all-new OnePlus 2 in virtual reality. That said, the company has begun giving away Cardboard Virtual Reality headsets for free, only asking for $5 to cover shipping costs.

Google’s Cardboard VR headsets are available through many online retailers for relatively cheap prices. In fact, Google has a page dedicated to its Cardboard VR retailers. Some of them are as cheap as $5 while more advanced and improved models could cost you as much as $85.

Either way, OnePlus says they have improved upon Google’s design, making the cardboard more compact, durable, and resistant to stains. As is the case for most of these headsets, OnePlus says it should be compatible with most devices up to 6-inches in size, which means Note users should have nothing to fear.

Keep in mind that there’s probably limited quantities available in this initiative to make VR more accessible. “We aren’t making any money by offering OnePlus Cardboard. In fact, we are losing money with each one,” OnePlus says.

It’ll be interesting to see just how well VR will work with the OnePlus 2 launch later this month. It’s said to be a powerful device, packing a Snapdragon 810 CPU, and a fingerprint scanner “done right.”

If you’re interested in getting your own Cardboard VR headset from OnePlus, just hit the source link below. They begin shipping on July 10.

source: OnePlus

Come comment on this article: Get your free Cardboard VR headset for the OnePlus 2 launch

3
Jul

Samsung and Oppo sued over bloatware in China


oppo factory and office visit aa (2 of 53)

Bloatware is something that I’m sure we’re all familiar with in some form, but some manufacturers and carriers are significantly worse at filling up internal memory with useless apps than others. This problem is particularly bothersome in China and the Shanghai Consumer Rights Protection Commission has decided to take legal action against Oppo and Samsung.

The lawsuit came about following numerous consumer complaints about unwanted apps. This case is the first of its kind filed by the consumer rights commission to be accepted by a Shanghai court.

While Samsung’s TouchWiz and apps have been broadly accused of being bloated by some, the Galaxy Note 3 (SM-N9008S) takes this to whole new level with 44 pre-installed apps in the Chinese market. The Oppo Find 7a (X9007) is an even worse offender, with 71 different programs crammed into memory by default.

“We hope it will force other companies in the sector to end the unreasonable, but common, practice of pre-installing apps without telling consumers. This is something that is very much necessary for the healthy development of the whole industry,” – Tao Ailian, Commission Secretary-General

A study of 20 smartphones found offending apps ranging from moderately useful applications, such as a dictionary, to games and online shopping services. Some of the apps were also accused of stealing cellular data. A similar case regarding user data had been brought against Apple’s iPhone 5, but the court ruled in Apple’s favour.

We saw a similar state of affairs when we took a look at the Chinese Galaxy Note 4, which attempts to make up for the lack of pre-installed Google Services with apps such as the Baidu Search Widget and other pieces of Chinese software, most of which cannot be uninstalled from the smartphone.

Chinese Galaxy Note 4 apps

Although not as bad, we found a number of pre-loaded apps couldn’t be uninstalled with the Chinese Galaxy Note 4.

The commissions biggest complaint is that neither company informed consumers about the number of apps pre-installed on the handsets and that consumers are not offered any information on how to uninstall those which they don’t want. The legal case is seeking a ruling that would require Samsung and Oppo to label the apps on packaging and to provide instructions on how to remove said apps.

The two smartphone companies have 15 days to enter a defense, after which a trial date will be announced. Hopefully this case will reel in the amount of bloatware included with some handsets.

3
Jul

“We invented copying”: Apple Music parody makes fun of Apple’s streaming service






style=”display:block”
data-ad-client=”ca-pub-8150504804865896″
data-ad-slot=”8461248232″
data-ad-format=”auto”>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();

We love a good Apple parody ad, and we love it even more now that it seems like Apple’s antics (or at the very least, perceived antics) are being widely caught onto and satirized. An Apple Music parody is on the menu today after College Humor rightfully identified the similarities between Apple Music, and the preexisting Spotify service. While we’re sure Apple representatives will have a million ways to convince you that the two are actually very different, and we’re aware of the irony that Spotify itself is a copy, it’s nonetheless an amusing watch as the satire goes beyond just Apple Music:

While it’s not quite as good as their Apple Watch parody, we’re really enjoying College Humor’s Jony Ive impression. And all the callbacks to the U2 debacle make this parody all the more sweet – for anyone who didn’t hear, Apple gave all its users the new U2 album for free last October, to which many people complained, and some were just plain confused. Who complains about free stuff?


What do you think of this Apple Music parody? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Source: YouTube

The post “We invented copying”: Apple Music parody makes fun of Apple’s streaming service appeared first on AndroidSPIN.

3
Jul

Apple Music Connect’s ‘Clunky’ Posting Process Detailed by Indie Artist [iOS Blog]


After the launch of Apple Music earlier in the week, many users began searching and following their favorite artists on Apple’s new social platform Connect, which aims to showcase new songs, videos, and pictures to fans of artists like Pharrell, Dr. Dre, and more, directly within the app. The process that artists have to take to create content for their fans was unknown, until today, when app developer and indie musician of the band Airplane Mode, Dave Wiskus, posted a detailed summary on his blog of the steps needed to make a post on Apple’s new social platform.

Wiskus hoped that Apple’s promise of Connect at WWDC meant a more level playing field between the musician and app developer worlds within the iTunes marketplace, and that “giving musicians any control at all over their brand identity on the iTunes Music Store,” would create a more stress-free and inviting platform for musicians, especially independent ones. So, Wiskus and his band Airplane Mode decided to put Connect through the ringer: debuting a brand new track on the service and seeing if the fans’ connection is as front-and-center as Apple intended.

The musician’s first thoughts of the upload process are summed up in one word: “clunky.” Wiskus found he needed the song he wanted to post to be in My Music in the iOS Music app, so for a brand-new, unreleased track, he had to sync it off his computer and then search for it on iOS. GarageBand updates for iOS and Mac released earlier this week also support uploads to Connect, but it is unclear if the format and process of using those apps was even more awkward or if Wiskus was unaware of these options.

1-newpost
In the next step — giving musicians the ability to edit song artwork and track details — Wiskus also had troubles with finishing up the post, the “Done” button staying grayed out and refusing to let him finish up and send it out to fans. After trying basic troubleshooting like backing out and making sure all the required fields were filled in, he discovered the problem: “I had to edit the artist name, add a space, and then remove the space. Then I could post the song. Of course.”

4-over-it
He also wondered how someone would delete a Connect post should there be a mistake, but eventually discovered that each post on the service can be brought up in a single post view with a “Delete” option. The issue being that since the entire post is treated as an interactable, tappable cell, “it’s not obvious” for users who may need to delete something in a hurry. But the musician noted that the biggest personal drawback is the complete lack of any in-depth fan interaction for his band once the content is actually uploaded to Connect.

3-posts1

But the worst offense of all is this: I can see no way to invite people to follow us on Connect. I can share the link. I can even tweet about it. Yet there’s no way to know how many followers we have, encourage people to follow us, or directly engage with anyone who hasn’t already purchased a song from us on iTunes. That feels broken. Somehow people were able to comment, which is great, but it makes me sad that I feel no sense of… well, connection. And I really, really want that connection.

Someone asked why I believed that Connect would ever be better than Ping, Apple’s previous attempt at socialifying iTunes. Ping’s mistake was that it tried to connect listeners to each other, as a way of discovering new music. Apple Music has re-thought that problem in some very interesting ways, and early indications are that the new approach works. For the social component, Connect wants to be about connecting artists with their listeners, but at the moment, it falls short.

While Connect lacks any of these basic features that services like Twitter and Facebook provide in abundance, Wiskus encourages Apple to begin consulting with bands who have both made it and use social media successfully every day, and the ones who haven’t yet but know the tools they need to make it there.

The indie musician makes multiple good points, especially in the lack of any in-depth social networking features on the service. Taking his band’s new post as an example, Airplane Mode’s post for the new song “Over It” got 7 loves and 4 comments, but the band can’t determine its own follower count or the amount of people that actually interacted with the post.

Lacking as well is any interaction on a user’s name or handle, which aren’t clickable on iOS or Mac and PC, leaving musicians with no real way to browse their fan community in any meaningful way. But, as Wiskus notes, the service has laid the groundwork for a possibly richer version of itself in the future. “These are early days,” the musician notes, “And there’s hope.”