Fetch’s shopping app puts a smarter concierge on your wrist
Talking into a smartwatch still isn’t the most socially acceptable thing to do, but a pair of startups is hell-bent on at least making it worthwhile. Fetch and Expect Labs — a personal shopping service and a purveyor of a voice-driven AI, respectively — have teamed up to make shopping on your Apple Watch a little less tedious with an improved concierge that works from your wrist.
Back in the day (i.e. last year), Fetch was best known for using a crew of humans to respond to messages sent from the app. If you wanted to buy, say, a sweet messenger bag someone was rocking in SoHo, you could snap a photo, send it along, and someone would eventually respond with the cheapest, most appropriate listing they could find. With Expect Labs’ voice recognition and analytical chops now being baked into the existing iOS/Apple Watch app, though, those requests can be chopped up and acted on more quickly. The end result? A faster first wave of hits, and a less headache-inducing shopping experience (they hope).
Let’s say you’re itching to laze under the sun in some far-off locale. You’ll be able to ask your Apple Watch to book you on the first flight to Bangkok next Thursday, and Expect Lab’s thoughtful back-end will dig up a handful of suitable flight options. From there, those results will get passed along to Fetch’s crew of shopping concierges so they can ferret out the best option and send it back home to you for approval. Well, eventually, anyway. Fetch and Mindmeld are talking up a partnership today, but a spokesperson confirmed that the actual functionality won’t go live for another few months (hopefully in time for a last minute summer holiday). And if you’re one of the countless multitudes who don’t — or won’t — wear an Apple Watch? No worries: The feature will find its way to Fetch’s Android app, too, though you’ll have to pay Fetch $10 a month on any platform for the privilege.
Filed under: Mobile
Leak hints at the first round of Apple Watch upgrades
There hasn’t been much talk of software upgrades for the Apple Watch now that it’s a real product you can (sort of) buy, but sources for 9to5Mac understand that there are some important tweaks in the pipeline. To start with, you’ll reportedly see third-party “complications” (those elements that show calendars, the weather and more) on watch faces. This sadly wouldn’t bring true third-party watch faces, but it’d give you a quick way to check information from other apps. You could see if you have any Twitter mentions just by looking at your wrist, for example.
Apple would also tackle concerns that you’re left high and dry if you lose the Watch. It’s believed to be working on a “Find my Watch” feature that, like Find My iPhone, would help you track, lock and wipe the wristwear. Since the device can’t easily connect to the internet on its own, it’d use its wireless signals to determine its location relative to the iPhone and ping you if it thinks you’ve forgotten your timepiece. This feature might depend on newer wireless hardware to work properly, though, so there’s no guarantee that you’ll see it this year.
The rest of Cupertino’s rumored plans are definitely dependent on new hardware. The company supposedly plans to add health features (such as blood pressure monitoring and sleep tracking) over the next “several years,” some of which likely didn’t make the cut the first time around. Also, the Watch would be marketed as a “primary input device” for the next-generation Apple TV. You wouldn’t need it (there would still be that more advanced remote), but it’d play an important role. And unlike many of the features mentioned in the leak, you may not have to wait long to see what the Watch can do with Apple’s new set-top box — Tim Cook and crew are still expected to unveil the new Apple TV at WWDC in June.
Filed under: Home Entertainment, Wearables, HD, Mobile, Apple
Source: 9to5Mac
Browse your recent Google Play tunes on your Android Wear watch
Google Play Music just got a lot more convenient… if you’re using a cutting-edge Android wearable, that is. Smartwatches running the new Android Wear 5.1.1 update (such as the LG Watch Urbane) now let you browse your recent Play Music items. If you’re bent on finishing an album or can’t stop revisiting a favorite playlist, you no longer have to pull your phone out of your pocket. You can also check out All Access radio stations if you’re in the mood for some variety. This upgrade won’t be much help if you want to sift through your whole collection, but it could save you a lot of time when you’re listening on the move.
Filed under: Wearables, Software, Mobile, Google
Source: Android Central
LG Watch Urbane review: a premium watch that falls short of greatness
There are only a few companies out there with as much experience making Android Wear watches as LG. After all, the platform’s only been part of the public consciousness for a year and yet this Korean giant has already made three of them. Its first sequel — the G Watch R — was a marked improvement over its dull, plastic predecessor, but the progress isn’t quite as clear with the new Watch Urbane. Sure, it’s running a fresh version of the Wear operating system, with some neat new features that haven’t yet trickled down to the rest of Google’s wearable ecosystem. Hell, it’s even got a look that’s meant to rival the Patek Philippes in your collection. All that said, after over a week of testing, I still couldn’t help but want more out of the Urbane, and you probably will too.
Hardware

We can keep this part brief, if you’re in a hurry: The Watch Urbane is mostly an aesthetic upgrade from the company’s last attempt. A heartfelt sorry to everyone who loved the subdued, dark chassis of the G Watch R — there’s very little of that chromatic subtlety here. The stainless steel Urbane is available in both gleaming silver and brassy gold finishes for $349 a pop, making them far and away the most expensive Android Wear watches out there. I’ve been testing the silver model for a week now, and I’m terribly grateful for my luck. The gold version (which we tried on back at MWC) is so garish, some of you will have to shield your eyes when looking at it. Beyond all that curb appeal, though, lies a very familiar beast. The Urbane sports the same 1.2GHz Snapdragon 400 ticking inside as last year’s GWAR (as I’ve come to call it), along with the same 512MB of RAM and the same 410mAh battery, just inside a more premium shell. That’d be a bigger deal if the GWAR was some pokey little chump, but it wasn’t then and still isn’t now. (I’ll dig into how well the whole shebang actually works in just a bit). Still, we haven’t yet hit the ceiling for what we can cram into our wrist computers, and it’d be nice if the $100 premium actually yielded some technical improvements.

For a timepiece that’s meant to be an upscale counterpart to the G Watch R, though, it isn’t exactly a dramatic leap forward in design. The Urbane has cleaner lines than the chunky Watch R and the bezel encircling the round screen have been trimmed down just a hair. Even better, the truly heinous hour markers have been excised completely, leaving behind nothing but brushed, spotless metal. The thing is, even though the main, round section of the Urbane’s body is pretty small, the lugs (also known as the bits that the watchband locks into) jut out straight from the rest of the body, making it feel wide and a little unwieldy. Maybe if you’ve got a seriously tiny wrist, the Urbane will feel like a slab latched to your arm, but mine is pretty petite and even I was able to manage. That’s at least partially because the 22mm leather strap that ships with the Urbane is comfortable and handsome (I especially dig the contrasting stitching), if a little stiff at first. LG’s gone a little gaga over the leather lately, but it’s simple enough to swap straps with the right tools and just a modicum of patience.

I’m not terribly thrilled by the Urbane’s screen, though. It’s essentially the same as the P-OLED one we saw in the GWAR last year, meaning it’s 1.3 inches across and produces some vibrant, natural colors when the occasion calls for it. That makes it smaller than the Moto 360’s display (hooray for higher pixel density!) but it’s not as bright either. The lack of an ambient light sensor to automatically crank screen brightness up or down is a curious misstep too — for a watch that’s meant to help streamline your day-to-day doings, having to fiddle with the settings when you enter a building or go outside doesn’t make sense. To be fair, the GWAR didn’t have one either, but surely it wouldn’t be too much to ask of a watch that costs $349, right? While we’re on the subject of things the Watch R didn’t have, you can now bypass your phone completely since the Urbane has a working WiFi chip and antenna (more on that later). The last part of the Urbane equation is the tiny magnetic puck that charges it. It lacks the elegance of a wireless charging system (a la the Moto 360), but it gets the job done and doubles as a place to stick your loose paper clips.
In use

My days with the Urbane — and just about any shiny wrist computer — were spent seeing how it fit into my life and also running the thing into the ground. The latter was, unsurprisingly, more fun. We can’t talk about how the Urbane package works, though, without first digging into the updated version of Android Wear it runs. The broadest strokes remain unchanged here, so you’ll be swiping through cards and pulling down the Quick Settings shade and telling Google to do things. (An aside: I love that Google’s voice recognition renders this thing’s name as “Washer Bane.”) Anyone who’s so much as watched someone use Android Wear will feel comfortable with an Urbane strapped to their wrist. So what does the update bring to the table?
Gesture controls, for one. Once enabled, you can quickly rotate your wrist forward to scroll down through your list of notification cards (but not your list of apps, strangely). Winding up and then jerking your wrist in the opposite direction takes you up through your list of cards. They’re nice to have in theory, but they’re hardly ever better than just flicking at the screen with your finger. Chances are you just had to touch the screen to interact with cards in the first place, so why not just keep touching it? It’s faster, not to mention more natural. (That fingering a touchscreen has started to feel “natural” is a rant best saved for another time.) The other thing is, they’ll only work when the screen is awake in the first place; kind of a tricky proposition if your hands are really full. If you absolutely, positively can’t spare another hand to unlock the screen, you can try snapping your wrist around more to wake it up, but it usually took no fewer than three times to actually make it happen. That said, it’s not completely useless: The gestures came in handy precisely once, while I was furiously scouring a crusty baking dish.

Sadly, those gestures don’t extend to another new facet of the Android Wear experience: a full-blown app list. In its earliest days, Wear basically insisted that you bark out a command at your watch, which would then figure out what app was already connected to that action. “OK, Google, tell me my heart rate,” for instance would inevitably fire up Google Fit or LG Pulse, or whatever you’d assigned as the best choice from your phone. Now, though, you can just flick through a list of Wear apps you’ve already installed and leap right into the mix. It’s a welcome change — there’s no more hesitation when you want to do something slightly more arcane — but it is a pretty interesting interface concession on Google’s part. It’s probably for the best, though, considering some of the common issues that still pop up when talking to your Watch.
There were a few times when I’d speak some responses aloud and get a big, friendly checkmark to confirm they’ve been sent, only to get a notification card moments later saying they actually haven’t gone anywhere. (Minor niggle: I hate that Google’s voice-to-text engine won’t properly capitalize my first spoken sentence, but handles the rest just fine.) At that point, I had to fire up the Hangouts app on the phone, and wouldn’t you know it? The logjam chose that moment to break loose and all of the messages would get sent at once. My ASUS ZenWatch and Moto 360 were guilty of this too, so it hardly seems fair to crucify the Urbane, but man, Google, there’s got to be a better way to handle this. Beyond that and the occasional Android Wear crash, swiping around and actually using the Watch is as smooth and reliable as ever — the Snapdragon 400 chipset isn’t showing its age just yet. Turns out, the Urbane is even pretty good at sussing out stuff you draw on-screen. Another recent addition to the Wear formula is improved emoji support, which you can either select from a list (boring) or render a rough approximation of one with your finger. It does a fine job of figuring out what you were going for, but I never managed to remember how to draw the funnier ones I prefer peppering my dumb conversations with.

Also new to the fold is a low-power mode for most of LG’s (generally quite pretty) stock watch faces. Now, when you clamp your hand over the screen to turn out the lights, you’ll be treated to a full-color watch face (sans second hand) ensuring for the first time that your watch actually looks the way it’s supposed to when you’re not using it. They’re all pretty legible under the unrelenting spring sun, too, though you’ll have to squint and/or fire up the Brightness Boost mode to help get you through those moments when the sun’s directly overhead and you’re feeling sort of miserable because of it.
Like I mentioned about a thousand words ago, you can connect the Urbane straight to a WiFi network (if it’s secured, you’ll have to complete the process on your phone) to keep the notifications rolling in. This part, thankfully, works just fine. I’d occasionally forget to grab the Android phone the Urbane was lashed to on my way out the door in the morning, but the steady hum of messages and Swarm updates resumed without hesitation once I wandered into our New York City office. Since it’s easier than ever to keep the Urbane connected to something, I was worried that battery life might take a hit as a result. That’s not exactly the case.
Gauging the battery life on smartwatches is always a bit tricky, since everyone uses them a little differently. While pretending to be a power user — responding to every message I could using my voice, running apps to kill time here instead of whipping out my phone, cranking brightness all the way up to fight solar interference — I found the Urbane would stick around for just under a full day. When I just focused on using the Urbane as a watch by keeping app usage and notifications to a minimum, I could squeeze way more out of it than expected. After one sad day when absolutely no one wanted to talk to me, the Watch leapt between Bluetooth connections to my phone and my home WiFi network for nearly two full days before finally taking a trip back to its magnetic charging cradle.
The competition

If your wallet has seen better days and you’re still clamoring for a Wear watch, you might consider ASUS’ ZenWatch. It’ll set you back a relatively scant $200, and while it doesn’t have niceties like a wrist-facing heart rate sensor (it’s baked into the bezel instead), the surprisingly stylish ZenWatch does a respectable job of blending in with your wardrobe. Then, of course, you’ve got LG’s own wares to consider. The $249 G Watch R is still one of our favorite Android Wear devices, and there’s a decent chance you’ll prefer its slightly less ostentatious looks. Save for the hardware-centric bits like WiFi connectivity, all of the new software tweaks found on the Urbane will find their way onto the Watch R (and just about every Android Wear device with the proper hardware) in due time.
The thing to keep in mind about buying decisions is we’ve still got a pair of handsome, premium options waiting in the wings too. With all the hinting that it’s done, Motorola might as well have announced its Moto 360 sequel already, and Huawei, of all companies, has a (pretty thick) looker in the Huawei Watch, which should start hitting store shelves any time now.
Wrap-up

The Urbane is a clear (and mostly thoughtful) improvement) over LG’s last two watches, and stands right up alongside the rest of the Android Wear greats. In fact, the blend of LG’s hardware and Google’s updated software makes the Watch Urbane the most complete example of Mountain View’s wearable vision to date. With all that said, though, its broad, chunky design, hefty price tag and lack of any dramatic technical improvements make the Urbane a hard sell. If you’re gung-ho about Android Wear and need something that won’t clash with your suit, the Watch Urbane is your single best choice right now. Still, with Google I/O basically right around the corner and some interesting new hardware in the offing, waiting to weigh out your options is probably your best move right now.
The ASUS ZenWatch is receiving its Android Wear 5.1.1 update
The ASUS ZenWatch is the latest smartwatch to be updated to Android Wear 5.1.1, in what is likely to be a staggered roll-out. LG’s Watch Urbane was the first to receive the update, and its good to see the update appearing for other members of the Android Wear family.
Reddit user Verdes8891 noticed his ZenWatch updating itself to build 1.1.1.1910765 while he was at work and was quick-witted enough to take the above image.
The update brings several features such as wrist gestures, always-on apps, and the ability to draw emoji’s on the watch display. One notable absentee is WiFi support. This is because, much like the LG G Watch, the ZenWatch doesn’t have the necessary WiFi component. The update should be hitting your ZenWatch soon, in the meantime, you can always get a sense of what Android 5.1.1 will bring by having a look at our walk-through here.
Source: Reddit
Come comment on this article: The ASUS ZenWatch is receiving its Android Wear 5.1.1 update
Android 5.1.1 for Android Wear is starting to roll out, ASUS ZenWatch gets first dibs
style=”display:block”
data-ad-client=”ca-pub-8150504804865896″
data-ad-slot=”8461248232″
data-ad-format=”auto”>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();
We know that the LG Watch Urbane is currently the only smartwatch on the market that is available with Android 5.1.1 for Android Wear, but we’ve been stumped by when the other devices running on the operating system would be receiving the update. Hopefully, it’s been a little demystified today after users have started reporting that their devices are receiving the Android 5.1.1 update as of today. In particular, Reddit user Verdes8891 posted a photo of his ASUS ZenWatch which had just received the update:
While it appears the rollout of Android 5.1.1 does indeed appear to have started, you shouldn’t get too excited just yet if you’re an Android Wear device owner – the ZenWatch is among one of the few Android Wear devices that doesn’t support the new Wi-Fi capabilities of Android 5.1.1 which would intuitively mean its update would ship first. By that logic, the LG G Watch and LG G Watch R should be receiving their updates quite soon as well, with all the other devices getting update some time after that. We’ll be interested to see who is actually next to update their smartwatch though – please be Motorola.
What do you think about the rollout of Android 5.1.1 for Android Wear starting? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Source: Reddit
The post Android 5.1.1 for Android Wear is starting to roll out, ASUS ZenWatch gets first dibs appeared first on AndroidSPIN.
Deal: Motorola Moto 360 leather-bound smartwatch on sale for $129.99
If you’re looking to pick up a leather-bound Moto 360 smartwatch, Woot has an excellent deal on the device.
For $129.99, you can get a stylish Moto 360 on your wrist. Keep in mind that the smartwatches they are selling are reconditioned. However, they do still come with the 1-year factory warranty, so if anything were to malfunction on the hardware side, Motorola would probably be willing to swap it out for you.
Reconditioned, that can be a real concern. However, it’s an excellent discount for this piece of hardware, and Motorola has an excellent warranty. Also, do keep in mind that this is the leather Moto 360 smartwatch–the metal-bound models are much pricier. Amazon lists their leather-bound Moto 360’s at $169.99, while getting them through Motorola’s MotoMaker is a flat $249, whether it be leather or metal.
Be sure to hit the source link below to pick up a discounted Moto 360. Not quite sure on getting the smartwatch? Be sure to check out our review.
source: Woot
Come comment on this article: Deal: Motorola Moto 360 leather-bound smartwatch on sale for $129.99
I regret buying an Apple Watch (and I knew I would)
I bought an Apple Watch. I didn’t preorder it, because at first I didn’t even want one. I warned people who asked me about the company’s first wearable: These things (Apple things) always get much better on the second attempt. Apple’s product history, perhaps even more so than other tech companies, is peppered with examples: the substantially thinner second iPad, the next iPhone that had 3G data, the MacBook Air sequel that had decent battery life and a slimmer design. Despite knowing that, something changed for me. I became an early adopter.
Our Editor-in-Chief Michael Gorman has already tested the Apple Watch. Thanks to a handful of early positive-but-with-caveat reviews and even more previews in the run-up to launch, I knew what it could do. Still, I felt like there must be a way that the watch would effortlessly dovetail into my life, reducing the need to constantly paw my phone and further lowering the barrier between myself and technology.
I’m not sure if it was Apple offering three different tiers of entry, or its plan to literally strap it to tastemakers and celebrities before mere muggles could buy one, but come launch day, I was intrigued. I called up my closest exclusive fashion boutique and made an appointment for a consultation. I wanted the old-school retail hit. The cold, hard sting that can only happen when you physically open your wallet to pay for This Thing You Want Right Now. To the tune of seven hundred dollars. Weeks later, it still stings.

I tried on a few different Apple watches (although several of the models were already sold out). And yes, of course I tried the Apple Watch Edition — in gold! — mostly for a laugh, and to see if I could tangibly feel the wealth. It was, er, heavier. However, I’d already decided I wanted the Apple Watch: I wanted the sapphire display and the stainless steel body, because I’m a clumsy fool and I’m bound to bump it against brickwork or accidentally drop it into a pit of spikes. The assistant gestured toward a corner: “There’s a mirror in the corner.” I winced, but then I went and stood in front of the full-length mirror. And stared at my wrist. And myself. And I looked like an idiot.
But I liked how the watch felt. More than the watch itself, I fell in love with the Milanese band that magnetically lashed it to my wrist. As it says on Apple’s own site:
“Selecting a watch is very personal. As with all things you wear, how it looks is at least as important as what it does.”
As a smartwatch — as a watch — it looks good. The materials, the attention to detail that Apple products are known for. It’s all on show here. Compared to the Android watches I’ve tested and played with, the feel, the quality, is on a completely different level. But many other (non-smart) watches at this price look just as good or better. I bought this because of what it could do beyond those mere timepieces. Indeed, it can do more, but it doesn’t do enough. Not yet. It doesn’t illuminate my life like my first iPhone, or revolutionize my work routine like the take-it-anywhere MacBook Air. To be fair, the Watch does some things well — notifications aren’t jarring and you have a lot of control over what appears and what doesn’t — but it just doesn’t do much once you’re wearing it. I use it a fraction of the time I use my phone. I’ve paid all that money for a smartwatch whose time hasn’t quite arrived.
I think about how much better next year’s Watch will be. It’ll almost certainly be thinner, possibly lighter, have a better screen and the battery will tick along substantially longer than this first model. (Curiously, I don’t really mind charging something nearly every day: With a metal strap, I would take the thing off each night regardless of whether or not the battery was on its last legs.)

But then, (nearly) every product sequel is better than the last, so why do I hold the Watch to a higher standard? Why do I regret the purchase? Me, the early adopter. (I bought a Pebble, for crying out loud.) It’s because I haven’t used it much since I got it home and synced the apps from my phone. I put it on and… I don’t know what to do with it. I flip around the watch faces, customize a chronograph with my own charms of choice and then waver between that and the addictive foot-tapping Mickey. I see how Instagram looks on my wrist; I get lost spinning around the moon, the Earth, the Milky Way. I send some NSFW doodles to a colleague, and then my heartbeat. I dictate to Siri a text message to my mum back in the UK. And I’m at a loss to what to do next. When I get a new phone, I can’t help but tinker around with apps, wallpaper, the camera, adding my music. The Apple Watch brings your apps closer, but it feels like a lot of things are trapped behind a glass display case. While I can see my notifications from a wide array of apps, interaction is either impossible for a lot of them, or limited to a few prescribed patterns or functions. Siri can send a text message, but you’d need the iPhone to do the same on email.
After two weeks of wearing the Watch, nothing has changed. I wear it, but I’m not gaining anything from the experience. My phone is typically nearby. Perhaps I’m just not a smartwatch kind of guy. I like to wear a watch, but when it’s the Apple Watch, it’s not giving me enough bang for my buck. I hand it to a friend to play with, and they press or swipe (or do something) and I see a screen I’ve never seen before — there’s very much a learning curve.

I’m not demanding (and not sure I want) smartphone-like functionality; I like the rigorously lightweight nature of how the Apple Watch deals with things. It takes a while to realize that, unlike iPhones and iPads, it’s not the apps that form the basis of how I use the Watch (it’s the swipe-up Glances for weather, music controls and activity monitoring). But I just don’t gain enough from these easily accessible features. At least not yet. Where the Apple Watch delivers best in functionality (like its fitness monitoring, which I’m continuing to use), I could get from a whole range of devices that are markedly cheaper.
It’s also (at least in my case) $700. Given how it looks and feels, and the technical accomplishments that go on inside that shell, is that the right price? I like it, but it’s not “hundreds of dollars” like. Maybe I’ll love next year’s model, or the 2017 edition — but I’ll likely be ill at ease to admit it, because I’ll still have the original Apple Watch, depreciated substantially. If anything is going to make smartwatches a mainstream thing, given what’s beating inside (and the HealthKit stuff, and Apple’s sheer influence when it comes to app developers), Apple will be the one to do it.
But it hasn’t yet — and I wish I hadn’t opened my wallet for this first effort. I expected that I’d be using it so much more than I am at the moment. The curse of a new product category, or an Apple product that I don’t need in my life? I’ll know one way or the other in the next six months. And if I change my mind, when I’m using Glances untold times a day, when the apps are perfectly attuned to a wearable, I’m willing to eat crow and tell you how it all changed.
ASUS ZenWatch 2 launching in Q3 2015 with improved battery life
While the likes of the LG G Watch R, Watch Urbane and the Moto 360 have taken all the attention among the Android Wear smartwatches, the ASUS ZenWatch has also received considerable praise from the customers.
A new report now suggests that the successor to the wearable will arrive in the third quarter of the year and will sport significantly upgraded hardware. The company CEO Jerry Shen brushed aside rumors of the smartwatch facing release delays and said that the ZenWatch 2 will be shown off at Computex Taipei between the 2nd and 6th of June.
It is also said that the ZenWatch 2 will come with a 4-day battery life, double the amount of battery that the current model offers. It’s not known if the smartwatch will sport a different display design this time around, but luckily we don’t have to wait long to find out.
Source: Focus Taiwan
Via: G For Games
Come comment on this article: ASUS ZenWatch 2 launching in Q3 2015 with improved battery life
The Moto 360 successor may have just visited Bluetooth SIG, announcement imminent?
<ins class="adsbygoogle"
style=”display:block”
data-ad-client=”ca-pub-8150504804865896″
data-ad-slot=”8461248232″
data-ad-format=”auto”>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();
The Motorola Moto 360 is one of the most successful smartwatches to date, which is no small feat considering the fledgling nature of the smartwatch market. A lot of its success has been attributed to its striking looks, but whatever its winning qualities are, we’re excited to see what Motorola has up its sleeves for the Moto 360 successor. Today, it’s been suggested that such a successor has just appeared on the Bluetooth SIG website and that the same thing happened just days before Motorola announced the original Moto 360. Hype train engaged.
The device on the listing is named BTMW03 and is only referred to as a “Motorola Android Device”. So how are we sure that it’s the next Moto 360? Last year’s device was called BTMW01 in Bluetooth SIG’s database, and we can’t imagine that the model numbers could be this similar and not be similar. With Google I/O just around the corner as well, it’s high time we saw some action from Motorola, who’s Moto 360 was the star of the show at 2014’s event.
Do you think the listing at Bluetooth SIG has anything to do with the Moto 360 successor? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Source: Bluetooth SIG via Droid-life
The post The Moto 360 successor may have just visited Bluetooth SIG, announcement imminent? appeared first on AndroidSPIN.











