Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘Samsung’

20
Oct

Blind Camera Shootout – the winner is…


big-smartphone-camera-shootout

If you’ve been following the homepage over the past week, you’ll have seen we published a big blind smartphone camera shootout to find out how the new Sony Xperia Z5 camera compares to the iPhone 6S, Galaxy Note 5 and the LG G4. Like our past blind camera shootout, we didn’t tell you which device took each image and today, we’re revealing the results – which smartphones takes the crown?

The cameras in numbers…

Before we reveal the results, let’s recap the various camera specs of each smartphone:

  Sony Xperia Z5 Galaxy Note 5 LG G4 Apple iPhone 6S
Resolution: 23MP (5520×4140) 16MP (5312×2988) 16MP (5312×2988) 12MP (4032×3024)
Focus: Hybrid AF Autofocus Laser Autofocus Phase Detection AF
Flash: dual LED dual LED dual LED dual LED
Manual controls? Yes Yes Yes partial
Aperture: f/2.0 f/1.9 f/1.8 f/2.2
Focal Length: 24mm 28mm 28mm 29mm
Camera Sensor Size: 1/2.3″ 1/2.6″ 1/2.6″ 1/3″
Pixel Size: TBC 1.12µm 1.12µm 1.22µm
Stabilisation:
Features:
Effective
Stabilisation
OIS OIS
Colour Spectrum Sensor
Digital Image
Stabilisation
Front Camera 5MP 5MP 8MP 5MP

Numbers are only one part of the equation and while you could make a decision on which is best just based on the specs, we all know that cameras and images are about more than megapixels, and algorithms and processing play a large part. Clear your mind, settle down and let’s check out which smartphone camera really is the best.

The Galleries:

Let’s take a look at each gallery again and discuss which smartphone took the best shot. Before we do that however, it’s time to reveal which device is which:

  • Phone A = Sony Xperia Z5
  • Phone B = LG G4
  • Phone C = Apple iPhone 6S
  • Phone D = Samsung Galaxy Note 5

Now, let’s look through the galleries:

Gallery 1

Blind-Camera-Shootout1-EOS

This shootout proved to be interesting as it tested how each smartphone camera handled the change between a colour-rich subject and a sky with various shades of grey. No smartphone was able to capture the sky in all its details but the iPhone 6S seemed to handle the transition between light and dark the best.

#gallery-1
margin: auto;

#gallery-1 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-1 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-1 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 2

Blind-Camera-Shootout2-EOS

This gallery combined an interesting collection of tests; from the varying sky colours to the detail of the individual tree leaves, the sign in the foreground and the building details and colours to the right.

The Note 5 wins this test as it handles the sky well, produces a good amount of detail in the sign and has clarity in the tree outline. The LG G4 and the Xperia Z5 come second and third respectively as they both produce good all round images while the iPhone 6S comes fourth as it overcompensates for the white balance in the image.

#gallery-2
margin: auto;

#gallery-2 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-2 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-2 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 3

Blind-Camera-Shootout3-EOS

This gallery was designed to see how each smartphone handles the details and colours in and on the shop front as well as the details in the shop signs and the reflections in the windows.

The Xperia Z5 wins this shootout as it produces a saturated image with deep colours that is closest the image produced by the EOS 70D. Next up is the Galaxy Note 5, which slightly overcompensates for the light but still captures details, while the iPhone 6S comes third and the washed out LG G4 rounds off this gallery.

#gallery-3
margin: auto;

#gallery-3 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-3 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-3 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 4

Blind-Camera-Shootout4-EOS

As pointed out in the comments on the original shootout, the wide angle of the Xperia Z5 lets it down here. When evaluating this gallery, we zoomed into the Apostrophe sign, the detail on the ladies’ hair and the grille at the end of this feature.

The winner is the LG G4, which handles the range of colours better than its rivals. The others are quite close with the Xperia Z5 adding a slight hue to an otherwise good image, the iPhone 6S handling the colours in the scene quite well and the Galaxy Note 5 offering impressive detail even if colours are a little saturated.

#gallery-4
margin: auto;

#gallery-4 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-4 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-4 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 5

Blind-Camera-Shootout5-EOS

This gallery was an interesting test as it evaluated how each smartphone handled the colours in the two different LED signs, as well as the detail of the door stand, which can be seen just past the front door.

Each smartphone handled the scene differently and the winner is the Galaxy Note 5, which comes closest to the EOS 70D image with detail and accurate colours throughout. Next up is the iPhone 6S which offers great colour reproduction in the signs and this is followed by the LG G4. The Xperia Z5 brings up the rear as it over compensates for the light and hence, the signs are almost washed out.

#gallery-5
margin: auto;

#gallery-5 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-5 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-5 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 6

Blind-Camera-Shootout7-EOS

While shots of scenery and subjects are always great, it doesn’t quite cover how each smartphone handles the contours and detail of a human face. This gallery aims to test just this as well as looking at the amount of bokeh in the details on the wall and mirror behind.

This proved to be a test of two halves with the Galaxy Note 5 narrowly beating the LG G4 to the top spot followed by the Xperia Z5 narrowly pushing the iPhone 6S into last place. In particular, the Xperia Z5 would have probably done a lot better had it been in oversampling mode and the iPhone 6S seems to get the white balance all wrong.

#gallery-6
margin: auto;

#gallery-6 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-6 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-6 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 7

Blind-Camera-Shootout8-EOS

For this gallery, the blue sky and amount of detail in the buildings was an interesting test of how good each smartphone’s HDR mode was. From the detail in the rooftops to the Breitling sign at the bottom of the scene and the Itsu sign in the immediate foreground, there’s a lot of detail to capture.

The iPhone 6S wins this with the Galaxy Note 5 very close behind as the sky is a little less saturated than on Apple’s flagship. The Xperia Z5 comes third over the LG G4, mainly because the latter produced a darker image and Sony managed to more accurately reproduce the colour of the sky.

#gallery-7
margin: auto;

#gallery-7 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-7 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-7 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 8

Blind-Camera-Shootout9-EOS

Almost the same scene as the above, this gallery used the red telephone box as the subject of the photo. When evaluating this, we looked for reproduction of details on and in the box, the clarity of the Itsu shop sign to the left and the amount of bokeh in the background details.

The Galaxy Note 5 wins this just for its reproduction of details inside the iconic telephone box while the LG G4 and the iPhone 6S tie for second, as the latter captures the details in the background better and the former is better at reproducing the white balance of the scene. Sony’s Xperia Z5 comes a very close fourth as a seeming lack of stabilisation results in some noise in the image.

#gallery-8
margin: auto;

#gallery-8 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-8 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-8 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 9

Blind-Camera-Shootout10-EOS

This was an interesting test as the flags had varying amounts of detail, the buildings were detailed and intricate and the sky can be just seen to the left. The Xperia Z5 has a good reproduction of the overall scene but lacks detail when you zoom into the image.

The LG G4 captures the scene well and captures good detail of the brickwork on the building while the iPhone 6S is slightly darker but does better at capturing the sky. The Galaxy Note 5 is very similar to the LG G4 as it captures the scene well including details in the brickwork but lacks depth when you zoom into the image even slights. It’s too close to call a winner in this gallery.

#gallery-9
margin: auto;

#gallery-9 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-9 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-9 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 10

Blind-Camera-Shootout12-EOS

This was an interesting gallery as it kicked off the low light testing with a combination of varying colours, intricate detail and bright lights. The Galaxy Note 5 probably wins this for the amount of detail captured even though the colour reproduction isn’t quite accurate.

Beyond this, the LG G4 comes second for the amount of detail captured and even though it is slightly noisy, the Xperia Z5 comes third with the iPhone 6S last thanks to inaccurate white balance. Interestingly, the Xperia Z5 would probably win this or come very close when used in oversampling mode.

#gallery-10
margin: auto;

#gallery-10 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-10 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-10 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 11

Blind-Camera-Shootout13-EOS

A combination a dark shop sign and a low light cream building above made an interesting test of each smartphone’s ability to handle low light conditions. The Xperia Z5 overcompensated for a lack of light resulting in a bright image but a lack of detail in the overall image.

The Galaxy Note 5 and the LG G4 tie for first place here as the overall image is almost identical from each of these devices and the iPhone 6S completely misjudges the white balance resulted in a dark image that fails to capture all the details.

#gallery-11
margin: auto;

#gallery-11 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-11 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-11 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 12

Blind-Camera-Shootout14-EOS

The last two galleries combine to form a test of the overall night shot capability of each handset. The first gallery is the scene captured with no flash and the second gallery takes the same scene but applies the inbuilt flash of each device.

As far as details in the image go, the Xperia Z5 is the best of all four devices as, although the iPhone 6S produces a lighter image, Sony’s best captures more details. The Galaxy Note 5 comes third and the LG G4 comes fourth, although it’s worth noting that the ISO is set quite low on both of these devices (although all handsets were set to auto mode) and they would produce much better images with a higher ISO.

#gallery-12
margin: auto;

#gallery-12 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-12 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-12 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 13

Blind-Camera-Shootout15-EOS

Now to the final gallery – which smartphone has the strongest and most accurate flash? The EOS 70D has a significant advantage thanks to its Xenon flash and while companies such as Nokia have used Xenon in the past, a dual/triple LED flash is the common standard as it can be used for both photos and videos (Xenon cannot be used while video recording).

The LG G4 and the Galaxy Note 5 tie for first place here as the former reproduces details better (albeit with a slight hue) while the latter captures the light better but lacks somewhat in the details. Sony’s Xperia Z5 comes a close third and the iPhone 6S rounds off this shootout in a lowly fourth place.

The results:

Now to the results – which device wins the shootout? Here’s how the voting stands at the end of this shootout:

(function ()
var opst = document.createElement(‘script’);
var os_host = document.location.protocol == “https:” ? “https:” : “http:”;
opst.type = ‘text/javascript’;
opst.async = true;
opst.src = os_host + ‘//’ + ‘www.opinionstage.com/polls/2300099/embed.js’;
(document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0] ());

It turned out to be quite a close-run race between the iPhone 6S and the Galaxy Note 5 for the title but Apple’s latest just beat Samsung’s latest with 38.2 and 34.1 percent of the 7810 votes respectively. Sony’s Xperia Z5 comes in third with 17.7 percent of votes while the LG G4 brings up the rear with 10 percent of all the votes.

The phones in detail…

.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;

.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;

.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;

@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;

@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;

body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;

body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;

As mentioned in the original gallery post, all the settings were at their maximum resolution, which proved to be detrimental to the Xperia Z5 (which relies on the 8MP oversampling mode for its best shots). We’ll be retesting these smartphones along with a few others in the big camera shootout in the coming weeks so stay tuned! Let us know what you thought about these results in the comments below guys and head over to the original shootout post for all the galleries.

20
Oct

Specifications of Samsung’s latest clamshell phone, the Galaxy Golden 3, leak on benchmark site


Galaxy_Golden_Front_and_Rear

If you thought that clamshell phones were a relic of the past, you are in for a surprise because Samsung is busy working on what is believed to be the Galaxy Golden 3, sporting similar internals to the Galaxy S6. It carries the model number SM-W2016, and like its predecessors, will likely only be available in select Asian countries.

Much like the Galaxy S6, the SM-W2016 (Galaxy Golden 3) sports the octa-core Exynos 7420 processor, ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU, 3GB of RAM, and runs Android 5.1.1. Unlike the S6 though, the clamshell only has a 4.6-inch display with a paltry 1280 x 768 resolution. The combination of such a low-resolution display with such a high-end processor and GPU should result in the Galaxy Golden 3 flying high in the benchmarks.

According to the GFXBench report, the Galaxy Golden 3 also features a 16MP rear camera, 5MP selfie camera and 64GB of internal storage. You can check out the full specifications below.

Samsung_Galaxy_Golden_3_GFXBench_

Source: GFXBench
Via: TechGadgetsz

Come comment on this article: Specifications of Samsung’s latest clamshell phone, the Galaxy Golden 3, leak on benchmark site

20
Oct

Next Samsung Galaxy S7 rumour suggests it will have a magnesium alloy body and better sound



http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();

It seems like we’re getting a new Samsung Galaxy S7 rumour every day this week. The latest rumour about Samsung‘s upcoming flagship is that it is going to have a slightly different construction with a magnesium alloy body, but still retaining some glass panels, presumably on the back of the device. There’s also a report that suggests that the Galaxy S7 is going to have more impressive sound quality compared to its predecessors – it’s been suggested the the Galaxy S7 will feature a ESS Technology chip which will give audio quality akin to analog sound. The area of sound in smartphones is very interesting at the moment with more and more mobile devices adopting technology that will make the devices more attractive to audiophiles.

This latest rumour comes on the heels of another report that the Galaxy S7 is going to be unveiled as early as January next year, earlier than the usual February/March slot that Samsung is more used to. Naturally, we can’t confirm any of this news yet, but it all sounds very good if this does turn out to be true.


What do you think about this Samsung Galaxy S7 rumour? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Source: MyDrivers, Weibo via SamMobile

The post Next Samsung Galaxy S7 rumour suggests it will have a magnesium alloy body and better sound appeared first on AndroidSPIN.

20
Oct

Will the Samsung Galaxy S7 be unveiled in January?



http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();

We’re heard quite a few Samsung Galaxy S7 rumours of the last few days including the fact that the new smartphone may have a form of 3D Touch and a USB Type-C port. The latest suggestion is that Samsung‘s new smartphone from its most iconic line of devices will be announced early. This would make sense given that the Galaxy Note 5 and Galaxy S6 Edge+ were announced in August, a month earlier than the usual September slot, which begs the question: will the Samsung Galaxy S7 be unveiled in January?

Note, that this is not anything unusual for Samsung – the Korean manufacturer has been very happy to forgo attending large conferences in preference of personalized events to show off their new devices. If Samsung were to announce the Galaxy S7 in January, this would give them a full month’s headstart before MWC 2016 which happens at the end of February – they might even have the device ready to sell at that point if all goes to plan. Of course, all of this is just conjecture at this point, but given how much Samsung is rocking the boat at the moment, we wouldn’t be surprised if this is how it all turned out.


What do you think about Samsung announcing the Galaxy S7 in January? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Source: ETNews via Phones Review

The post Will the Samsung Galaxy S7 be unveiled in January? appeared first on AndroidSPIN.

20
Oct

Will Samsung unveil the Galaxy S7 this January?


samsung_logo_with_peopleWe have been hearing some rumours here and there about the new Galaxy S7. Now, there are some new ones saying Samsung might speed up the launch of the S7 to this January.

We already know that Samsung will for sure release a flat screen phone and a dual curved edge phone just like they did this year. It’s hard to say exactly when Samsung will show off these new devices to the world, but the rumours are pointing to January 19th. That would be two weeks before MWC starts, Samsung usually unveils new devices there. It’s not too far fetched to believe this date since it’s only two weeks before the normal unveil time and because the Note 5 was also pushed up two weeks compared to it’s normal release date.

The report is also saying the S7 may feature a new ePoP chip which combines all the main sensors on a single die. The first phones to use this before were the S6 and S6 Edge last year.

Source: Etnews
Via: Sammobile

Come comment on this article: Will Samsung unveil the Galaxy S7 this January?

19
Oct

Rumor: Samsung Galaxy S7 to be announced in January?


samsung galaxy LOGO 2

Rumors about the Galaxy S7 have been circulating since Samsung’s current smartphone hit stores – if not earlier – and while most have been seemingly based on sheer conjecture or else not worth repeating, today’s offering seems a bit more believable. Korean news outlet ETNews is reporting that the new super smartphone will make its official debut in January – possibly the 19th – and that there should be both a “premium” and a “sub-premium” variant.

SamMobile had previously reported that this dual dichotomy is going to be a follow-up to the S6 and S6 Edge; the SM-G930 being the standard-affair offering, and the SM-G935 featuring the OEM’s iconic curved display.

Also mentioned in today’s rumor report is a claim that “Project Lucky” will use an ePoP chip to integrate all the necessary sensor components on a single die, an engineering strategy employed by the S6 to help improve efficiency.

samsung galaxy s6 edge logo mwc 2015 c 3

Spec-wise, the details are somewhat confusing. There may be several different processor variants depending on the market the S7 is sold in, and the flagship smartphone may use a pressure-sensitive display technology similar to what Apple has started marketing. Also slated are USB Type-C support and even a dual-camera arrangement with a brand new 20-megapixel primary sensor.

As with all rumors, this piece should not be considered as factual until Samsung so speaketh. The specs could change, and the product launch could even be held later than the typical MWC-debut. Just a few weeks back, some were claiming the S7 would be announced in December, for reference. Still, given the strategic decision to launch the Galaxy Note 5 (and S6 Edge+) earlier than usual, anything is possible.

19
Oct

US Jury fines Apple $234 million in damages for infringing on a CPU patent owned by the University of Wisconsin


Apple-iPhone-6

Apple earlier was facing almost a billion dollars in fines for infringing on a University of Wisconsin-Madison patent that improved processor efficiency. Now, Apple has only been ordered to pay $234 million in damages, as a US jury has come to the conclusion that Apple did not infringe on the patent willfully.

The University of Wisconsin-Madison holds a patent that aims to improve processor speed and efficiency, but upon an investigation, Apple was found to be using the technology in its A7, A8, A8X processors, which are found in the iPhone 5S, iPhone 6, and iPhone 6 Plus, respectively. There is an ongoing separate lawsuit for violating the patent with its A9 and A9X chipsets, which are found in its new iPhone 6S and iPhone 6S Plus devices.

As far as the fine goes, whether it be almost a billion dollars or as low as $234 million, it’s nothing more than a slap on the hand for Apple. After all, the Cupertino-based company netted $184 billion in revenue during 2014. It goes without saying, the company is sitting on quite a hefty amount of cash.

Apple has been subject to many of these types of lawsuits over the years, with some high profile cases against Samsung. At some point, these lawsuits just get ridiculous, as many of these patent infringements in question should be labeled as fair use. After all, there’s not many ways that you can make slide-to-unlock functionality and autocorrect unique to your company.

Apple wasn’t able to be reached for comment, but is expected to appeal the court’s decision in the University of Wisconsin-Madison case. In other words, it could be years before we see a final, set-in-stone decision.

source: BBC

Come comment on this article: US Jury fines Apple $234 million in damages for infringing on a CPU patent owned by the University of Wisconsin

19
Oct

New patent suggests Samsung Galaxy S7 will have 3D Touch too



http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();

In case you might not have heard, the new iPhones were released with a feature called “3D Touch” which allows for pressure sensitive functionality on a smartphone. Apple wasn’t exactly the first to get it out there (Huawei beat them by a few weeks), but naturally everyone only remembers Apple’s version. As is commonplace in the smartphone industry, when a new and wonderful feature is released on a competitor’s device, it’s only a matter of time before somebody copies it, which makes it less surprising that a new Samsung patent appears to suggest that the Samsung Galaxy S7 will have 3D Touch.

Samsung Galaxy S7 will have 3D TouchOkay, so it doesn’t explicitly say anything about the Galaxy S7 and it definitely won’t be called 3D Touch (unless Samsung wants to get in an expensive lawsuit against Apple again), but it’s no coincidence that this patent is appearing not long after the iPhone’s release and it’s obvious that Samsung hates being a step behind Apple. We’ll have to wait this one out and see whether Samsung actually makes use of this patent, but we’ve got a good feeling that they will.


What do you think about the Samsung Galaxy S7 having 3D Touch? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Source: galaxyclub.nl via SamMobile

The post New patent suggests Samsung Galaxy S7 will have 3D Touch too appeared first on AndroidSPIN.

19
Oct

Samsung Pay support rolling out to compatible Verizon devices


Samsung Pay press

Is Google Wallet simply not good enough for you? Maybe you want to try an alternative, something Samsung smartphone owners have been enjoying since late last month. But apparently not all Sammy handsets are created equally, or at least they are not supported equally. Samsung Pay was a little late to Verizon devices, but the carrier told us a software update would end the wait soon.

The day has come and now Big Red subscribers with supported smartphones can enjoy Samsung Pay support. The trick here is that the update with support is rolling out, but Verizon users won’t see the application already installed. Instead, they will have to download it from the Google Play Store.

Download Samsung Pay from the Google Play Store!

samsung-pay

Regardless, the update will be hitting the latest Samsung handsets soon, including the Galaxy S6, Galaxy S6 Edge, Galaxy S6 Edge+ and Galaxy Note 5.

Samsung videos

.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;

.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;

.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;

@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;

@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;

body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;

body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;

Samsung Pay is still evolving, though, so you will need to be a little patient with the manufacturer. Right now the service only supports American Express, Bank of America, U.S. Bank and Synchrony Financial. Not to mention the fact that there isn’t much support at stores to even use wireless payments.

I haven’t seen the update hit my Verizon Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S6 Edge yet, so we are sure the update is rolling out slowly. Have any of you gotten it? Also, please share your thoughts on Android Pay if you have been using it!

SamsungPay-Trial_Main_1

18
Oct

Verizon’s Samsung Pay update now out for compatible phones


Verizon has started rolling out the software update it promised earlier this October — one that adds Samsung Pay to the Galaxy S6, S6 Edge, S6 Edge+ and Galaxy Note 5. A Reddit user has posted a snapshot of an email sent to Samsung reps at Best Buy confirming the upgrade, while Android Central’s Andrew Martonik has already installed it on his Galaxy S6. The mobile payment app arrived in the US for other carriers in September, but Big Red was a bit late to the party. Take note that it only works with MasterCard, Visa or AMEX issued by a major bank, though, such as Citi and Bank of America. Even if you couldn’t care less about Samsung Pay, you may still want to download that update when you get it. It also patches up the Stagefright Android vulnerability, which gives hackers access to your phone just by sending an infected MMS.

Via: Reddit, Droid Life, Android Central

Source: Droid Life, Android Central, Reddit