Samsung refreshes Galaxy A series with better camera, Android 5.1, more
Samsung today announced that it has refreshed the Galaxy A series of smartphones. The new 2016 line will roll out to China later this month and will later expand to other markets across the globe.

Key features in the new Galaxy A3, Galaxy A5, and Galaxy A7 are Android 5.1 Lollipop as well as optical image stabilization for the camera. Both the front and rear sensors feature an F1.9 lens which means better photos and low light and dark conditions. The new Galaxy A5 and Galaxy A7 now support Samsung pay and can be protected by fingerprint verification.
The three phones share a number of specifications across the board including the 13-megapixel rear camera and 16 gigabytes of storage. There are, of course, differences between the models such as display size and battery; processor and memory configuration very as well.
To learn more, check out Samsung’s press release.
The post Samsung refreshes Galaxy A series with better camera, Android 5.1, more appeared first on AndroidGuys.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active ultimate drop test: gets used as a hockey puck
Towards the tail-end of 2015 we’ve seen both Motorola and LG introduce highly ruggedized devices that have seen a great deal of positive praise. Yes, we’re talking about Moto’s Droid Turbo 2 and LG’s V10. Both handsets are more than capable of taking a great beating, and both companies are heavily marketing this durability. But let’s not forget about Samsung.
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;
During the summer months, AT&T and Samsung formally unveiled the Galaxy S6 Active, bringing many of the same things we liked about the Galaxy S6 but adding an increased level of durability to the mix. Recently, AT&T even started selling a 64GB storage variant as a reminder that the Active is still here, despite increasing competition in the ultra-rugged space. So how durable is the Galaxy S6 Active? A new video from Unboxing Therapy aims to find out by putting the phone to the ultimate test: using it as a hockey puck.
See also: Best Samsung Galaxy S6 Active Cases
While we won’t ruin the whole video for you, needless to say, the Galaxy S6 Active stands up admirably to the beating and it is clear that Samsung did well in creating a variant of the Galaxy S6 that can handle more than just your average daily use. Be sure to check the vid out for yourself, embedded above.
What did you think of the video? Surprised by how the GS6 Active performed or not? Let us know your thoughts in the comments. For those that are super impressed and considering buying, we recommend checking out our full review as well.
Samsung Gear VR now available to purchase in the UK for £80
The Consumer Edition of Samsung’s Gear VR is rolling out globally, and the next region to get is the UK. The virtual reality headset in Frost White is selling on Samsung’s own online store for just £80. The Korean tech giant also noted that O2 will carry the headset starting in early 2016.
Samsung in partnership with Oculus is bringing the Consumer Edition of the Gear VR to the market, saying that it’s 19% lighter than the Innovator Edition. The Consumer Edition also comes with some other minor bells and whistles, such as better padding and improved navigation.
Keep in mind that to use the headset, you’ll need one of Samsung’s more recent flagship devices to act as the screen, such as the Galaxy S6 Edge+, the Galaxy S6 Edge or the Galaxy S6. Virtual reality is still in its infancy, but there’s still some neat things you can do with it. And it’ll only get better from hear on out. That said, it might just be worth picking one up.
source: Samsung UK
Come comment on this article: Samsung Gear VR now available to purchase in the UK for £80
Samsung’s updated Galaxy A5 passes through TENAA
It looks like Samsung could be preparing to launch an updated version of its Galaxy A5 smartphone, according to a new filing at TENAA. China’s telecommunications equipment certification center certified the device, and it’s sporting model number SM-A5100. It passed through the FCC only days before.
The listing from the Chinese regulatory board shows that the new handset is equipped with a 5.2-inch OLED display, a 1.7GHz octa-core processor, 2GB of RAM, 16GB of internal storage, and microSD support up to 128GB. On the software side of things, it’s running Android 5.1.
It shouldn’t be long before Samsung gives its new line of Galaxy A devices the official unveiling. We’re not sure when that’ll be exactly, but given that the A3, A7, and now A5 have all been certified, it shouldn’t be very long from now.
Any Galaxy A fans looking forward to an updated model?
Come comment on this article: Samsung’s updated Galaxy A5 passes through TENAA
Report: Samsung Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge to have “little overhaul”

When Samsung formally took the wraps off the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S6 Edge earlier this year, the reaction was a mysteriously mixed message: the Korean conglomerate was clearly showing the world – and its most vocal critics – that producing a “premium” non-plastic device was hardly beyond its ample means.
At the same time however, the lack of a removable battery and microSD support angered some long term users. The big question now, especially amid mounting rumors, is just what the Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 Edge will ultimately shape up to be. According to a new report from The Korea Times, the shape itself may not be such a surprise.
Specifically, an industry source has said the following:
The venue for unveiling new Galaxy smartphone, tentatively named the Galaxy S7, is still undecided. Though Samsung has so far been preferred to hold its own unpacked event for new products, the S7 will get a little change.
Another source, who spoke to the news organization via telephone, offered the following:
As the S6 and S6 Edge represented progress, the S7 will have improvements both in picture quality, performance and other some new features. But because smartphones have already been commoditized, you don’t need to spend more on a surface overhaul…The key point is can consumers enjoy content with enhanced viewing quality and boosted processing speed.
To this end, it is suggested that the new pair of premium products to release early next year will focus more on increased performance from the SoC, and new DRAMs, and a brighter and/or higher quality SAMOLED panel.
Rumors have suggested the S7 and S7 Edge may see a return to the inclusion of microSD support. Those hoping for a revival of removable power cells however should potentially prepare for disappointment now.
Tears of a clone: Could the S7 and S7 Edge look virtually identical to this year’s flagships?
Analysis: more of the same?
In the recent past, Samsung has been suffering from declining mobile revenue and market share due in no small part to keen competition from China. Once the undisputed leader in said country, domestic OEMs such as Xiaomi, Huawei, Oppo, and OnePlus have eroded the stronghold Samsung once had.
These manufacturers, many by selling exclusively online and thus eliminating costs associated with marketing and traditional distribution channels, are offering highly competitive products at costs far below those of the “old guard” of Android. The game has changed significantly in the past two years. Vlad Savov of The Verge recently said “the flagship smartphone is dead” and mused that, “the demise of terrible phones has made all phones exceptional.”
The demise of terrible phones has made all phones exceptional. (Vlad Savov, The Verge)
Samsung’s top management is well aware of this situation, and has been taking drastic action in recent weeks, with perhaps the most noticeable being yesterday’s replacing the organization’s head of mobile operations. This comes shortly after a powerful call to arms from the conglomerate’s Vice Chairman, Kwon Oh-hyun, who stated that “If we resist changes, then we won’t survive.”
Assuming today’s report of some similarity between the S6 and S7 pans out to be true, it would suggest that Samsung has accepted the change in market and thus did not feel it prudent to spend mass scale resources on designing a brand new looking handset when the existing one is more than sufficient. Apple successfully does this every other year, and even Sony and HTC have followed suit with their flagships in recent times.
According to Counterpoint, the Samsung J series has been performing the best in the third quarter of this year.
Where is the growth?
Assuming that Samsung isn’t going to make significant superficial changes to its 2016 flagships, it follows logically to infer a segment of its potential customer base, be it existing or future, might not feel compelled to upgrade to the new variants coming next Spring. Those that have the S6 or S6 Edge might see little reason, and those who don’t might find the 2015 models to be of better value given that their cost will invariably come down even further.
The question then, becomes where Samsung might be getting the money it may be missing from this situation. The Korea Times points out that:
Counterpoint, a market research firm, recently said that Samsung’s market share gains have come at the low-end in the Galaxy J series during the third quarter of this year, strengthening views that price and hardware-initiated specifications are the “factors” rather than the appealing and curvy surface design.
Indeed Samsung’s fantastic third quarter earnings this year were such largely due to component sales and a favorable exchange rate. That the company would seek to push hardware internals in 2016 as opposed to spending large sums of cash on design R&D makes sense. Likewise, any new breakthroughs or developments made can ultimately help the OEM with future B2B contracts for components.
Wrap Up
We would like to hear your thoughts on this issue. For those that own an S6 or S6 Edge, would you feel compelled to buy an S7 or S7 Edge even if they retain an extremely similar design? What might make you upgrade? For those who don’t have an S6 or S6 Edge, would you be more likely to purchase them instead of next year’s offerings due to cost-performance issues?
Please feel free to take our surveys below and then drop us a line in the comments section to voice your opinion!
(function ()
var opst = document.createElement(‘script’);
var os_host = document.location.protocol == “https:” ? “https:” : “http:”;
opst.type = ‘text/javascript’;
opst.async = true;
opst.src = os_host + ‘//’ + ‘www.opinionstage.com/polls/2313217/embed.js’;
(document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0] ());
(function ()
document.getElementsByTagName(‘body’)[0]).appendChild(opst);
());
Samsung’s Gear VR goes on sale in the UK for £80
If you’re intrigued by VR and whether the technology is really up to snuff, there’s a new smartphone-powered headset by Samsung to consider. The consumer-ready Gear VR is now available in the UK, replacing the “Innovator Edition” models that were aimed at developers and early adopters. It’ll set you back £80 and, like its predecessors, requires a Samsung smartphone to act as the display. The Galaxy Note 5, Galaxy S6, Galaxy S6 Edge and Galaxy S6 Edge+ are all compatible — which is fine if you already own one of them, otherwise it’s quite an investment.
Via: Wareable
Source: Samsung Shop
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active survives multiple slap shots
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is aimed at being a more rugged alternative to the normal Galaxy S6 for people with more rugged lives. However, just how strong is it? YouTube channel, Unbox Therapy, has decided to test just that by taking it out to a hockey arena and using it as the puck.
I expected the S6 Active to basically break right away, but it did way better than I would of guessed. It was used as a puck for pretty much every aspect of a hockey game from passing to slap shots.
Click here to view the embedded video.
The most insane part is it even survives not one, but two full-on slap shots. The only time it blew up was when one shot was just a little too hard and it hit the post. No phone will ever survive that. Obviously, we do not recommend you go out and try this with your S6 Active, but pretty cool to watch someone else do it.
Come comment on this article: Samsung Galaxy S6 Active survives multiple slap shots
Samsung Internet for Gear VR is a browser made for 3D headsets

Why should VR headset be limited to their own apps and specialized software? There’s a world of information out there, waiting to be found by curious users surfing the web. Remember. The internet has evolved, so someone had to come up with a good browser made for virtual reality; that someone seems to be Samsung.
The Korean giant has just announced Samsung Internet for Gear VR, a browser optimized for 3D headsets. Now users can take advantage of the whole internet without having to download anything locally. That is, aside from the growing catalog of apps and content becoming available to this newly-adopted technology.
See also: Samsung Gear VR reactions at Oculus Connect

This browser does support 360-degree video streaming, as well as HTML5 content, so it will be a breeze for developers to offer content for the Gear VR without having to go through specific app/content stores. They can simply make anything available through their own websites!
.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;
.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;
.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;
.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;
.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;
.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;
.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;
@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;
@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;
body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;
But there is one major issue to tackle before any browser makes it to market – input. How can we type with a VR headset? Samsung has implemented a couple methods. The first is voice recognition, a technique that…. speaks for itself. The second is a bit more interesting. There is an on-screen keyboard that can be manipulated with Gaze Mode, which means you can select letters, numbers and symbols by simply directing your moving your head around and pointing at your character of choice.

Samsung Internet for Gear VR is a pretty interesting concept and we really can’t wait to try it out. We are sure you feel the same way so let’s touch on how you can get your hands (or eyes) on this browser. The beta version will become available for download beginning December 2nd (tomorrow) from the Oculus Store. You will need a supported device. These include the Samsung Galaxy S6, Galaxy S6 Edge, Galaxy S6 Edge+, Galaxy Note 4 and Galaxy Note 5.
Who is downloading? Let us know how it treats you in the comments below!
Why 2016 will be the year of the Chinese, unlocked budget smartphone
Samsung, LG, Sony, HTC, and Motorola are all Android names we are all very familiar with. Those tech giants have been making our phones for quite a few years, and have been charging us an arm and a leg for flagship devices, which typically last anywhere from one to three years if you’re lucky. Flagship devices from these manufacturers can cost as low as $450 and can go as high as $850 depending on where you buy them from.
In general, most of them perform the same functions since they are all based on Google’s Android platform. And they all keep us pretty happy. Sure there are differences that justify cost differences, and for the most part, most smartphone enthusiasts will always create a market for high-end smartphones. Smartphones are no different than cars – some will prefer sports cars from the likes of Porsche and Ferrari, while other will prefer luxury from Mercedes and Audi. For the vast majority of people, they will stick to their GM, Toyota and Ford made vehicles opting to save a little bit of money in features they do not need. At the end of the day, all cars serve to provide a means of transportation.
Flagship smartphones like the Samsung Galaxy Note5, the LG V10, Moto X Pure, HTC One, and the Sony Xperia Z5 premium are all fantastic devices. They all have high-end processors, super clear and colorful displays up to 4k resolution, fantastic speakers and software features that other mid-range and budget phones do not have. And for many of us enthusiasts, we will ALWAYS buy flagship devices, as we really love technology and maximize our usage from these devices. There is no argument from me that there is value in these flagships. But…
What do most of us use our phones for?
There is a good amount of people who need flagship devices to keep up with their lifestyles. But there are more people who simply use smartphones for phone calls, text messaging, scheduling, social media, photos, email, internet browsing, shopping, and basic gaming. All of the flagship devices do all of those tasks with ease.
The things we hoped smartphones would do, like replace desktop computers simply is not happening and probably won’t happen anytime soon. Whether we have a two year old Nexus 5, Galaxy Note5, or brand new LG V10 all Android devices perform the basics.
The difference in internal hardware is becoming less obvious
A couple of years ago it was very easy to pick up on the differences between phones with big V12 engines like the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, versus the first four cylinder powered Moto G. The Moto G was terrible at gaming, didn’t get LTE data reception, had a very basic camera, and had a poor to average looking display.
The Note 3, on the other hand, had a great looking OLED 1080p display, Snapdragon 800, 3GB of RAM, 32GB of memory, a 3200mAh battery, and a 13MP rear camera. The 2013 Moto G on the other hand had a 720p display, Snapdragon 400, 1GB of RAM, 8GB of memory, 2070mAh battery and a measly 5MP rear camera. The differences in hardware back in 2013 were significant and the price difference justified the performance. Keep in mind the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 was four times more costly than the Moto G.
Fast forward to 2015, and compare the Samsung Galaxy Note5 to the Letv 1s. Yeah I know you probably haven’t heard of Letv, but there’s a good chance you didn’t hear of Huawei until this year too. Only until the Nexus 6P did many people in the U.S. take Huawei seriously, even though they had been dominating in China for some time now. They’re a major part of the reason why Samsung’s profits have been on the decline recently.
Both the Letv 1s and the Note5 have octa-core processors and 32GB of internal memory. Yes the processors are made by two different manufacturers, but the difference in processors is slim in real world performance. Both devices have beautiful and durable build quality, with the Letv 1s being made in all metal, and the Galaxy Note5 being a combination of glass and metal. The Letv 1s also comes with the latest USB type-C standard found on the Nexus 6P, Nexus 5X and OnePlus 2. Both smartphones have a fingerprint reader and both currently run Android 5.1. The major differences are the Note 5 has a 16MP rear camera, 2k display and 4GB of RAM, whereas the Letv 1s has a 13MP camera, 1080p display and 3GB of RAM. The biggest difference between the two, is the Letv 1s comes fully unlocked at $180 whereas the Note5 comes in at $750. That’s quite a price difference.
The cost of phone insurance is extremely high
One of the biggest scams in the U.S. mobile industry is smartphone insurance. Most of us cannot afford to replace a $750 phone if we were to drop it or get it wet, so we rely on insurance to get us out of a jam. There are many companies who offer phone insurance. Why? Because they make lots of money on insurance plans. No company would exist if they lost money.
Let’s take a look at Best Buy’s Geek Squad insurance program.
$7.99 per month for insurance actually doesn’t seem too expensive, especially when it covers drops, spill and cracks. But when you factor in the deductible cost of $149.99 per incident on phones up to $800, a new display can cost $150 plus $7.99 in the first month of ownership. If you purchase the insurance and use it 11 months into owning your device, to replace a cracked display, the cost of that protection now is $88($7.99 x 11 months) plus the $149.99 deductible for a grand total of $233. Worse yet, do not use the insurance over two years, and you just paid $192($8 x 24 months) for peace of mind! That peace of mind is more expensive than a brand new and unlocked Letv 1s.
The total cost of ownership for a Samsung Galaxy Note5 over two years with insurance is close to $1000 with taxes. The total cost one Letv smartphone without insurance (no need to buy insurance if it is more expensive than the phone) is five times less expensive. You could spend that $800 in savings on an Android Wear smartwatch of your choice, headphones, wireless speakers, or better yet your child’s college education. Heck, if you want, buy one Letv 1s this year, and buy the upgraded version next year, and you’ll still have an extra $600 in your pocket if we can assume the next generation stays under $200.
Budget smartphones don’t need insurance and you can even make an argument that they don’t even need a screen protector nor cell phone case which is additional savings.
Keep in mind, almost all phones comes with a one year warranty which protects against manufacturer defects. They just don’t cover accidental damage or loss with those warranties.
Regardless of how you buy your phone, through financing or on a two-year contract, you will pay the full price for the device. Cellular providers use confusion to build in costs.
T Mobile has shaken up the cellular industry in many ways, and one of the most significant ways was by blowing up the two-year contract. AT&T and Verizon have contributed to making cell phone plans very confusing through gimmicks such as the two-year contract. The two-year contract offered expensive flagship phones for prices of $200 or less with the actual retail prices being close to $750. Many consumers were fooled into believing a two-year commitment was enough to justify the discounted price of the smartphone.
AT&T and Verizon were not giving the phones away at $500+ discounts out of the kindness of their hearts – they were simply hiding the fees of the phones in other ways. Rather than charge a customer directly for the full price of a smartphone, Verizon and AT&T would, and still do charge higher fees for a “connection.”
For example, let’s buy a Samsung Galaxy Note5 through AT&T.
There are three options to choose from the first of which is buying outright for $739.99 plus tax. Buying outright qualifies the customer to a $25 discount of their smartphone plan. Total cost of the smartphone is $739.99 plus taxes.
The second option is paying $24.67 for 30 months on the Next plan with a $25 monthly discount on your bill, or paying $249.99 down without the $25 discount for 24 months. $24.67 over 30 months works out to be $740.01, but the $25 discount that applies to your bill is given as a “connection fee” discount which normally costs $40 per month. You don’t have to take my word for it, you can read the fine print at at&t.com.
Lastly you can buy the Note5 on a two-year contract for $249.99, plus tax on the full retail value, plus a $45 upgrade fee, and you lose the $25 discount over those 24 months. The cost excluding taxes, since taxes are applicable to all three methods is $845. So you actually pay more when you sign a two-year contract since you lose the $25 per month discount on service.
The take home message, is no matter how you buy a new smartphone, whether being on a two-year contract, or financing the device through the Next program, you will pay the full price of the phone. Again you don’t have to take my word for it, just read the fine print in your contract. If you have an attorney who represents you, I suggest you have him/her read the fine print and explain it to you, because it truly is confusing.
T-Mobile exposed the nature of hidden fees, but that just opened the door for unlocked smartphones.
The problem with unlocked budget smartphones is there are very few trustworthy reviews
The big manufacturers of smartphones like LG and Samsung have been sending reviewers test units for many years now. New and upcoming Chinese smartphone manufacturers don’t have the same budgets that the big players do, and every dollar counts. It’s why OnePlus created the dreaded invite system, so that they don’t over produce smartphones and have to sell them at a loss later.
Profit margins are slim when you make devices under $200. Chinese smartphone manufacturers have to adhere to strict budgets and have not sent U.S. tech reviewers many phones to review. They also do not have a presence in U.S. stores like Best Buy, Frys, or even AT&T, Verizon and T Mobile stores. And many tech reviewers are so spoiled by getting free review units that they won’t spend their own money on unlocked review units. Plus it is a lot more fun to review a full fledged flagship than a sub $200 smartphone.
Many people who buy smartphones come to websites like ours to get unbiased reviews. Without trustworthy reviews, it’s hard to trust a company you have never heard of and I don’t blame you.
Why 2016 will be the year of the unlocked smartphone
Most importantly hardware differentiation between budget and flagship devices are becoming more and more difficult to realize as a user. There is a good chance many of you have not used the latest budget smartphones from Chinese manufacturers like Xiaomi, Letv, Huawei(excluding the Nexus 6P), Doogee(who?), Bluboo, Meizu, Elephone and Ulefone. There’s more than that too. You may have read about them and have been intrigued by Chinese budget devices, but without having the ability to see one for yourself in person, you probably have not pulled the trigger on actually buying one.
Recently I have had the pleasure of using a couple of these unlocked devices under $200 and they have run Android 5.0 or 5.1, work with LTE on AT&T, and most importantly they can keep up with my needs. I consider myself a power user(subjective of course). By power user, I mean I text frequently, make phone calls, browse the internet, watch movies, play games, email, take pictures and more.
I have been pleasantly surprised to learn that budget phones from China are incredibly well built, use high-end materials, have great displays, have high megapixel cameras, and are very snappy when it comes to performance.
As you readers become more educated in the hidden fees of cell phone ownership, and Chinese manufacturers start to enter the U.S. market, many of you will start experimenting with these devices and spreading the word like wildfire that these phones are highly capable of being daily drivers. I have made a commitment to buy at least four to six devices under $300 from Chinese manufacturers with my own money so I can provide high quality reviews. And to prove my reviews true, I will be giving away each phone after I review it to one lucky reader who can validate or invalidate what I said in my review.
My first two reviews will be of the ASUS Zenfone 2(I know, it is more well known, but I wanted to start with an established brand) and will follow up with the Doogee F5.
If I’m lucky, many Chinese manufacturers will see the value in my reviews and will maybe provide me with review units at cost or free which means more free devices for you too.
But take my word for it that 2016 will be the year of the unlocked, Chinese budget smartphone. Come back in 2017 and let me know if I’m wrong. Huawei already proved they can build one of the best Android devices by offering us the Nexus 6P, now the doors are wide open for Xiaomi, Letv, Doogee, Meizu and the others to flood the U.S. market with affordable devices that can withstand daily usage. Watch out Samsung, LG, HTC, Motorola – you have a giant target on your back.
The post Why 2016 will be the year of the Chinese, unlocked budget smartphone appeared first on AndroidGuys.
Dongjin Koh is the new president of Samsung’s mobile business
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();
It was only a matter of time before things were changed up at the top in Samsung‘s mobile division, and the Korean manufacturer moved to make those changes yesterday. Dongjin Koh is the new president of Samsung’s mobile business, taking over the day-to-day management of the business group from J.K. Shin, who remains in charge of long term strategy and areas for the company to grow into. However, for those of you who think this change at the top will drastically change things at Samsung, think again – according to one expert from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Chang Sea-jin:
“Koh is basically the same person as Shin… There is no real change and Samsung appears to be continuing on the hardware-centric path.”
So, that’s cool.
Koh moves into the top spot after leading the mobile R&D division to make arguably Samsung’s most impressive devices to date, the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy Note 5 – though none of this has managed to turn around the mobile division’s fall from grace. However, the hope is that this changing of the guard may improve things, somehow.
What do you think about Samsung mixing things up at the top in the mobile division? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
The post Dongjin Koh is the new president of Samsung’s mobile business appeared first on AndroidSPIN.














