Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘Samsung’

21
Jul

Silicon Valley giants side with Samsung in a dispute with Apple


Patent lawsuit shutterstock ShutterStock

Apple and Samsung have been arguing in court over various patent infringements for years now and the proceedings are still apparently ongoing. In the latest development, a number of Silicon Valley’s top firms, including Google, Facebook, HP, Dell and eBay, submitted a “friend of the court” brief on July 1st in support of Samsung, according to a newly sourced document.

For a little background, Samsung was initially order to turn over all of the profits from its Galaxy devices that the court decided were infringing on various Apple intellectual property. Patents ranged from tap-to-zoom, finger scrolling and edge-to-edge glass design, just to name a few.

The original case would have cost Samsung close to $1 billion, but the amount was reduced to $548 million following an appeal. Samsung wants the decision completely reversed.

The document signed by numerous tech giants shows support for Samsung because other companies are worried that the ruling sets a precedent and could have an impact on their own incentives to invest in future research and development. Particularly, that the current ruling could “lead to absurd results and have a devastating impact on companies who spend billions of dollars annually on research and development for complex technologies and their components.”.

“Under the panel’s reasoning, the manufacturer of a smart television containing a component that infringed any single design patent could be required to pay in damages its total profit on the entire television, no matter how insignificant the design of the infringing feature was to the manufacturer’s profit or to consumer demand.“

Essentially, the concern is that expensive and inclusive nature of these type of patent disputes could stifle innovation. Even one small and seemingly insignificant component can apparently lead to all of the profits generated from a bigger product being surrendered.

Apple has reportedly asked for a dismissal of Google’s involvement in the briefing, as its Android operating system powers Samsung’s handsets. We will have to wait and see if the intervention of Silicon Valley’s finest can tip the balance in Samsung’s favour.

21
Jul

Samsung starts rolling out Lollipop update for the Note 4 in Chile, Colombia and Uruguay


Samsung_Galaxy_Note_4_Back_Galaxy_Note_4_Logo_TA

Samsung is currently rolling out the much-anticipated Lollipop update to all unlocked variants of the Galaxy Note 4 located in Chile, Colombia and Uruguay. As far as added functionality goes, this upgrade transports Android 5.0.2 to the handset, in addition to a truckload of bug fixes and stability improvements.

Hit the break for the full changelog.

  • OS Upgrade – Lollipop 5.1.1
  • Security Enhancements
  • Improved User Interface
  • Stability Improvements
  • Further Improvements to Performance
  • Enhanced Features

As is the norm, the upgrade is being rolled out in stages, but if you don’t feel like waiting for a notification confirming that it’s ready for your device to hit your unit, you could always search for the update manually.

To do so simply open the Settings app, scroll to the bottom and tap on “About Device”, hit “System Updates”, then select “Check for updates”. Once done, the upgrade will start downloading from Samsung’s servers.

 

 

Come comment on this article: Samsung starts rolling out Lollipop update for the Note 4 in Chile, Colombia and Uruguay

21
Jul

Latest report shows market gains for Huawei this year


huawei-logo-mwc-2015-4

Market research firm TrendForce has just published its latest findings for the smartphone market in 2015. The results show gains for the booming home grown Chinese brands, while some of the big international brands have seen their shipment forecasts cut.

Looking at the big picture first, TrendForce has revised its entire forecast for 2015 shipment growth, down from 11.6 percent to just 8.2 percent. Apparently, a negative global economic outlook and falling demand are responsible, and looks to be hitting the premium brands the most.

As for the international names, Samsung is said to be experiencing mixed fortunes. Quarter on quarter growth for total shipments is expected to hit an impressive 26.8 percent, due in no small part to the launch of the Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge. However, annual shipment forecasts have been lowered to 45 million units this year, due to increased competition in the low-end market and a mark down in expected yearly demand for Samsung’s latest flagship.
Q2 2015 Global Market Share
The LG G4 is experiencing a similar slump below initial expectations, which TrendForce attributes to a lack of a hardware improvement over the G3. As a result, annual shipments may just grow by only 8 percent, suggesting that the company will miss its sales target. However, the company’s shipments are still up year-on-year.

It’s not all been bad news for Android OEMs though. Chinese manufacturers continue to show strong signs of growth. Huawei and Xiaomi have now taken a place in the global top 5.

Huawei has become the China’s number one smartphone brand this year as well, with an estimated annual shipment growth of nearly 40 percent. The company is expected to be the first Chinese company to sell 100 million phones in 2015.

Xiaomi has shipped 34 million units so far this year and has also continued to see its global market share grow. Although it is looking unlikely that the company will hit its 100 million units target. OPPO and VIVO could also see their sales grow by 30 percent or more this year, thanks to their more unique product positioning.

Q2 2015 China Market Share

However, Lenovo has fallen out of the top five this year to sixth place, with shipments expected to decline by around 25 percent this year. It is possible that we may begin to see some consolidation in the Chinese market, as competition continues to drive prices down.

With the year half way through, the trends from last year look set to continue. Strong competition in the Chinese market is still resulting in high demand, while some of the more expensive manufacturers are still struggling to differentiate their products from their previous generations.

21
Jul

Silicon Valley companies back Samsung in infringement case against Apple






style=”display:block”
data-ad-client=”ca-pub-8150504804865896″
data-ad-slot=”8461248232″
data-ad-format=”auto”>
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();

The patent infringement lawsuit between Samsung and Apple has gone on for as long as anybody can be bothered to remember. Most recently, Samsung was ordered to pay $548 million USD, their total profits from Galaxy devices that were deemed to have infringed on Apple patents. However, an interesting twist has been thrown into the mix: a number of Silicon Valley companies have backed Samsung in a “friend of the court” briefing which involved the likes of Facebook, Google, eBay, HP and Dell. Their argument is that enforcing that Samsung pay Apple, the court would essentially be “stifling innovation”.

“If allowed to stand, that decision will lead to absurd results and have a devastating impact on companies, including [the briefing draftees], who spend billions of dollars annually on research and development for complex technologies and their components.”


There’s a lot of truth in that statement, as it could have been anyone instead of Samsung – Samsung just happens to be the biggest target. But of course, Apple sees differently – Apple wants the briefing dismissed, arguing that since Google is part of the movement, it can’t possibly be impartial as a “friend of the court”.

You can kind of see where each side of the argument is coming from, but ultimately this is a matter for the courts to decide – even so, what are your thoughts about who is right? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Source: MacRumors via SamMobile

The post Silicon Valley companies back Samsung in infringement case against Apple appeared first on AndroidSPIN.

21
Jul

Big tech companies back Samsung in court case against Apple


Samsung Galaxy Note 4, Apple iPhone 6

Just like Taylor Swift in Bad Blood, Samsung has also found a powerful group of backers in its fight against Apple in court. According to a document unearthed by Inside Sources, Google, Facebook, eBay, Dell, HP and other big tech corporations have submitted a “friend of the court” brief on July 1st, supporting Samsung’s stance. The two companies have been embroiled in legal fisticuffs for years, ever since Apple first filed a lawsuit against Samsung for violating various intellectual properties, such as tap-to-zoom, sinle-finger scrolling and two-finger zooming, as well as edge-to-edge glass design, among other things.

Samsung was eventually ordered to turn over the total profits of the Galaxy devices the court decided were infringing on Apple’s IPs, worth almost $1 billion. Earlier this year, the Court of Appeals lowered that amount to $548 million, but the Korean electronics maker is still fighting for the decision to be reversed completely. See, the companies that filed the friend-of-the-court briefing believe that having Samsung turn over the total profits of those devices sets a bad precedent. They think that if the decision is allowed to stand, it “will lead to absurd results.”

Inside Sources quoted this relevant part of the document to illustrate what the companies mean:

Under the panel’s reasoning, the manufacturer of a smart television containing a component that infringed any single design patent could be required to pay in damages its total profit on the entire television, no matter how insignificant the design of the infringing feature was to the manufacturer’s profit or to consumer demand.

Software products and online platforms face similar dangers. A design patent may cover the appearance of a single feature of a graphical user interface, such as the shape of an icon. That feature-a result of a few lines out of millions of code-may appear only during a particular use of the product, on one screen display among hundreds. But the panel’s decision could allow the owner of the design patent to receive all profits generated by the product or platform, even if the infringing element was largely insignificant to the user and it was the thousands of other features, implemented across the remainder of the software, that drove the demand generating those profits.

As for Apple, it has reportedly asked for the dismissal of Google’s involvement in the briefing, since it’s the company behind Android, the platform loaded on most Samsung devices.

[Image credit: Janitors/Flickr]

Filed under: Misc, Apple, Samsung, Google, Facebook

Comments

Via: The Verge

Source: Inside Sources

21
Jul

Facebook, Google and Other Silicon Valley Companies Side with Samsung in Patent Case


Facebook, Google, eBay, HP, Dell and other Silicon Valley companies weighed in on the ongoing Samsung and Apple patent case, siding with the Korean company in a “friend of the court” briefing filed on July 1 to the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals and first spotted by Inside Sources [PDF via AppleInsider]. The companies argue that the court ordering Samsung to turn over profits would lead to stifled innovation.

apple_samsung_logos

If allowed to stand, that decision will lead to absurd results and have a devastating impact on companies, including [the briefing draftees], who spend billions of dollars annually on research and development for complex technologies and their components.

The companies contend that technology like smartphones, which include thousands of different components in both hardware and software, is too complex to award profits, like Samsung is being ordered to do, based on individual component infringements. They argue that any company could then be opened up to patent infringement cases for insignificant features like a specific user interface creation that only appears on a single screen of an app, therefore stifling innovation.

After the companies submitted their thoughts to the court, Apple responded by arguing their thoughts should be dismissed. The Cupertino company specifically called out Google, pointing out that the company has a strong interest in the case because its behind the Android operating system used by Samsung and that the Mountain View company cannot be an impartial “friend of the court”.

In mid-June, Samsung asked the court to reconsider a central part of a recent ruling that ensured Apple would receive $548 million in damages, with Samsung wanting the court to rehear the case with a full 12-judge roster rather than the 3-judge panel it used in the previous ruling. That previous ruling reduced Apple’s reward from $900 billion to $548 million.


21
Jul

Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 vs Apple iPad Air 2


With Samsung having unveiled their latest Galaxy Tab S2 tablets, we take a look at the competitor that this new range of tablets has been created to directly compete against – the Apple iPad Air 2.

Both the iPad Air 2 and the Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 have a 4:3 aspect ratio and the Galaxy Tab S2 is being marketed as a media consumption device, much like the iPad Air 2. As for the rest of the specs, we’ve compiled a list of the specs for each tablet and stacked the iPad Air 2 and the Galaxy Tab S2 against each other to see who comes out on top.

The winner? The Galaxy Tab S2 has a bigger battery, faster processor, and is lighter, but iOS has been proven to be better at memory management and power optimisation than Android. With that being said, it really is going to come down to the simple choice of Android against iOS given the similarities between these two devices.

Let us know what you think in the comments below.

The post Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 vs Apple iPad Air 2 appeared first on AndroidGuys.

20
Jul

MetroPCS offers free phone, free data to lure new subscribers


MetroPCS wants you to port your phone number over to its prepaid network. How badly? Well, let’s just say they’ll give you a free phone and some free data if you do so.

Starting July 20 and running through the end of September (30th), customers who bring their phone number to MetroPCS can get in on a limited-time promo. Sign up with service on a rate plan of $40 or higher and purchase the Samsung Galaxy Core Prime and you’re nearly there.

Switch to Metro-deal

Using a combination of instant rebates, the Samsung handset shakes out to zero dollars. Normally priced at $130, it’s currently offered at $50 before the new rebate.

In addition to the free phone, the qualified port-in customers can receive 1GB of 4G LTE data each month. It isn’t clear how long the free data deal lasts but small print indicates it should stick around as long as the account stays in good standing.

Note that the deal is only good in retail stores and that T-Mobile customers aren’t eligible.

MetroPCS

The post MetroPCS offers free phone, free data to lure new subscribers appeared first on AndroidGuys.

20
Jul

Opinion: Does the Galaxy Tab S2 have things going for it… or against?


samsung galaxy tab s2 9.7 5

Earlier today, Samsung finally announced the Galaxy Tab S2, successor to the premium pair of tablet products it bequeathed onto the world last year. Given the reaction some have in its wake, we felt this to be an ideal time to examine in greater detail just what’s going on with the Galaxy Tab series, and why the one device which consumers might have been looking forward to is suddenly a little less out-of-this-world.

The overview

As we mentioned in the official unveiling post, the Galaxy Tab S2 comes in 8-inch and 9.7-inch variants, both of which use a 4:3 aspect ratio. Included is a 2048×1536 pixel S-AMOLED display. They feature an Exynos 5433 octa-core SoC, 3GB of RAM, 32 or 64GB of on-board storage, and an 8-megapixel rear, 2.1-megapixel front camera combo, no flash. Android 5.0.2 will be running on top of the updated TouchWiz seen on the Galaxy S6, along with the the same “touch-based” fingerprint sensor. The tablets support microSD up to 128GB and will come in both Wi-Fi-only and LTE variants.

The 9.7-inch variant will include a 5,870mAh battery, and the 8-inch variant a 4,000mAh one. Both devices will be available in either black or white, measure just 5.6mm thick and employ an aluminum frame, but soft-plastic rear panel. SamMobile has listed the following prices for the European model:

  • Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 Wi-Fi: €399  ($432)
  • Galaxy Tab S2 8.0 LTE: €469 ($508)
  • Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 Wi-Fi: €499 ($540)
  • Galaxy Tab S2 9.7 LTE: €569 ($616)

Note that European prices are often significantly higher than the price of the same product in the US.

#gallery-1
margin: auto;

#gallery-1 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 33%;

#gallery-1 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-1 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

The potential problems

As we briefly touched upon in the announcement post, there are a few issues with the Tab S2, if not Samsung’s entire 2015 tablet series at-large. None of these points are deal-breakers alone, but when factored as a whole they might serve as a second thought for the more prudent shopper. Let us break them down, point-by-point in an attempt to determine just how relevant they are:

The cost

asus zenpad s 8.0

Asus’ ZenPad S shares a number of similarities to the Galaxy Tab S2, yet costs roughly half the price.

While nothing is set in stone about what kind of money these tablets will cost, the above figures pegged the most expensive variant at roughly $616. This is indeed somewhat concerning as tablet sales are not exactly booming. Samsung’s conscious effort to continue charging a premium price for its products may be commendable, but look no further than its smartphones to see it’s not necessarily a good one. Even the near-universally praised Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge flagships aren’t selling in the vast quantities many anticipated, save for perhaps in North America. Elsewhere in the world keen competition has seen the erosion of Samsung’s unrivaled domination among Android OEMs.

The high cost of the Galaxy Tab S2 is also unlikely to do it any favors when the original Galaxy Tab S models are now reduced in price, and will probably see further cuts now that their replacement has been announced. Given that last year’s offerings were fantastic products in their own right, and still hold up quite well today – complete with Android Lollipop no less – it becomes all the more difficult to find a reason for more price-conscious customers to actively make a decision to spend more for… not so much more.

The value

One reason the cost of the Tab S2 is likely to be a problem is the perceived value of the product. These days, there are many, many other tablets to chose from, many employing top notch specs and build quality. This includes the original Tab S, but also many other products including the Nexus 9 and others featured here.

samsung galaxy s6 vs note 4 aa 5

Like the Galaxy Note 4 (right)? We hope so, because the Tab S2 is using the same SoC as opposed to the newer one featured in the Galaxy S6 (left).

It is here that Samsung may have dropped the ball. The Galaxy Tab S2 is by no means a dinosaur – far from it – but the decision to go with last year’s Exynos 5433 instead of the new 7420 seen in the Galaxy S6 is a questionable one given the cost of the tablet. Granted, the casual consumer is likely never to notice the difference, but at this price tag one gets into more hard-core users, and ones who will likely compare specs before making a decision. Likewise for a premium tablet, it only makes sense to use premium parts.

The build quality

The construction itself is questionable. Samsung has basically deemed it fit to take the “Galaxy Alpha” approach, if you will, towards the product. The Tab S2 will have a full metal frame, yet once again goes with a soft plastic backside that, while comfortable to hold based on initial reports, is decidedly not metal. How this decision was made is a mystery, but the fact it was shows that Samsung has no intention to compete earnestly with Apple. This is further emphasized by the aspect ratio and this claim by The Wall Street Journal about the early release of the Note 5, in order to avoid competing with Apple’s new generation of iPhones.

Nexus 9 vs iPad

In a very real way, the Nexus 9 (centered) could be easily swapped for the Tab S2 and the picture is still a valid comparison: one uses only a metal frame whereas the iPads have a unibody aluminum construction.

It also showcases just how maligned the naming convention for the tablets has become. The Tab A series, for example, was neither mid-range nor was it made of metal unlike the smartphone series. Likewise, the Tab S2 is neither made (entirely) of premium parts nor is it packing the best specs as per the Galaxy S smartphones. This seemingly is serving no other purpose than to dilute the brand itself by conflating them with more idealistic hardware yet providing less.

Samsung’s tablet naming conventions seemingly serve no other purpose than to dilute the brands themselves by suggesting idealistic hardware yet providing less.

Cost cutting

While very few people might actually use tablet cameras, their inclusion at all implies that they serve a function to at least some users. While the lesser nature of the Tab S2’s pair of cameras might be easy to overlook, we have said – on more than one occasion now – that the decision to remove the rear flash smacks of cost cutting. Irrespective of if anyone is actually going to use the flash, the fact that Samsung deemed it acceptable to remove it from the Tab S2 after prominently including it on both the original size variants of the Tab S hints at cost-cutting. Since when is it acceptable to remove elements from a premium product that will cost a premium price?

galaxy-note-5-render-main

This user-created render of the Note 5 showcases what it is expected to look like. Hardly an “Old Samsung” product, to be sure.

The decision to use a plastic back, as mentioned above, is yet another element of keeping manufacturing prices down. The same goes for the SoC, and perhaps even the omission of UFS 2.0 storage. All of this was fine-and-dandy in 2014 when the “Old Samsung” was still out to play, yet it seemed like the Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge were the products of a new Samsung, the same one that is seemingly going to produce a similar-looking Note 5.

The aspect ratio

While some might be perfectly OK with the 4:3 aspect ratio, the vast majority will not, less there would be far more Android tablets made already of this alternative size situation. Full-screen does have its fair share of uses to be sure: it’s much better for browsing the web or even reading eBooks. But is it mainstream? Perhaps not. While this might have been acceptable on the Tab A, the decision to make both size-variants of its premium offering 4:3 might come back to haunt Samsung. The choice also means this product is directly competing with the iPad Air 2 and iPad Mini 3, along with whatever new devices Apple will release this year. The same is also true of the Nexus 9, and even the much more price-friendly Galaxy Tab A and Asus ZenPad S.

00_SM-T815_Black_black_Standard_Online_S1

Putting aside accusations of “chasing Apple”, it is quite feasible that Samsung chose 4:3 to try and reach out to new potential consumers, ones who aren’t happy with the vast number of widescreen offerings that comprise the near-entirety of Android tablets. It also serves to make the Tab S2 stand out from the previous incarnation and that is, in-and-of-itself, a deciding factor for some.

.rvs_wrapper
width: 350px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left
float: left;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none
width: 100%;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center
text-align: center;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: none;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos:not(.align_none) ul li:nth-child(2n+1)
clear: both;

.rvs_title
font-weight: 600 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
font-size: 24px !important;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right .rvs_title
padding-left: 20px;

.rvs_title a
font-family: ‘Roboto Condensed’;
color: #3a3a3a;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
padding-top: 10px;

.rvs_wrapper.align_left.cbc-latest-videos ul li,
.rvs_wrapper.align_none.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 15px 0 0;

.rvs_wrapper.align_right.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 0 0 15px;
float: right;

.rvs_wrapper.align_center.cbc-latest-videos ul li
padding: 0 7px;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a
font-weight: 400;

.rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li > a .yt-thumbnail
margin-bottom: 0;

@media only screen and (min-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
width: 100% !important;

@media only screen and (max-width : 480px)
body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos
width: 100%;
float: none !important;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;

body #page .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul
overflow: auto;
max-height: none;

body .rvs_wrapper.cbc-latest-videos ul li
float: left !important;
clear: none !important;

Wrap up

The Galaxy Tab S2 is by no means doomed, nor is it a bad product. It’s definitely an improvement over last year’s offerings, on paper. It has a beautiful SAMOLED screen of which no other company can rival and that accounts for a lot. The question, however, is just how competitive the Galaxy Tab S2 is among an ocean of tablets, most of which have long-since decided to forgo premium price points yet still provide killer hardware. Samsung needs to put its best foot forward in light of declining profits, and while the Tab S2 definetly has a nice pedicure, we’re not quite sure all the rough edges were polished.

In the coming weeks, we will be offering detailed reviews and comparisons of the Galaxy Tab S2 line, so let’s reserve final judgement until then. Please be sure to leave us your comments below, along with any suggestions for which products you would be interested in seeing it compared to.

// <![CDATA[
(function () ());
// ]]>

20
Jul

Samsung is preparing to launch the Galaxy A8 in South Korea on July 24


samsung_galaxy_a8_landscape

According to a new report, Samsung is gearing up to launch its recently-announced high-end smartphone, the Galaxy A8, in its home country on Friday, July 24. The handset is believed to carry a 649,000 Korean Won ($563) price tag and will be available in both white and gold colorways.

In case you need a refresher on its specifications, the Galaxy A8 sports a 5.7-inch Super AMOLED display, a 2.5GHz Snapdragon 615 quad-core processor, 2GB of RAM, an Adreno 405 GPU, a 16-megapixel rear-facing camera, a 5-megapixel front-facing shooter and a 3,050mAh non-removable battery.

This divulgence comes just a matter of days after the Chinese prices were leaked — $515 for the base model and $564 for the 32GB variant — where it’s rumored to be launching at the end of this month.

Source: SammyHub

Come comment on this article: Samsung is preparing to launch the Galaxy A8 in South Korea on July 24