Russia is blocking LinkedIn
While LinkedIn is still waiting for the ink to dry on Microsoft’s $26.2 billion deal, the Russian government is gearing up to ban the professional networking site altogether. As the New York Times reports, a local court in Moscow has ruled that LinkedIn is not in compliance with with the country’s data protection rules. The company will be blocked from operating in Russia starting Thursday, but the company can still appeal the court’s decision.
The ban stems from a new set of rules passed by Russian legislators last year that requires any personal data collected on Russian citizens to be stored on servers inside the country itself. While the Russian government claimed the rules would protect the data in case of a hack like the LinkedIn breach in 2012, others have pointed out that it could give the government the ability to demand user data from international companies. As the Times also notes, Facebook and Twitter are currently in violation of those same data storage rules. While it is currently unclear why LinkedIn was called out over those larger social networks, the Russian government has also been trying to replace government software and demonize Microsoft for allegedly colluding with the US government.
Less than five million of LinkedIn’s 467 million users are in Russia and in a statement, LinkedIn said “the Russian court’s decision has the potential to deny access to LinkedIn for the millions of members we have in Russia and the companies that use LinkedIn to grow their businesses.” The company said it was interested in meeting with Roskomnadzor, the country’s telecom watchdog group, to discuss their request.
Source: New York Times
Windows 10’s virtual trackpad turns tablets into mice
Microsoft has begun testing out a new virtual trackpad feature in Windows 10, allowing users to turn their tablets into mice while using external displays. Chances are it’ll form part of the OS’s “Creators Update” arriving next spring, with the feature now live in the latest Windows 10 Insider Preview release (build 14965, if you’re interested). The virtual trackpad is exactly what it sounds like: A square boundary with left and right mouse buttons sitting below it, performing the function you’d expect but using a device’s touchscreen to receive inputs.
The idea is a Windows 10 tablet can double as a mouse while it’s hooked up to an external monitor or TV. While it may seem like a niche use case, it means anyone wanting to use their slate like a proper PC can carry one less peripheral with them — assuming it performs the task well enough. The virtual trackpad comes to Windows 10 alongside updates to Microsoft’s Sticky Notes and Windows Ink Workspace software, and you can take it for a spin right now provided you’re in the Insider program’s Fast Ring.
Here’s the new onscreen trackpad feature for Windows 10. Designed for when you connect to a second display and don’t have a mouse pic.twitter.com/yiL3uVLduS
— Tom Warren (@tomwarren) November 9, 2016
Via: The Verge
Source: Microsoft
The first VR-ready Windows 10 phone is incredibly basic
Google is leading the mobile VR race with its Daydream platform and headset, but Microsoft is getting ready to join in too. Alcatel has made a $470 Windows 10-powered version of its Idol 4S phone, and it’s the first mobile device running this OS to have virtual reality capabilities. Like its Android brother, the new Idol also comes with its own headset. I played around with it to see if this first stab at VR on Windows 10 Mobile is any good. Unfortunately, it isn’t.
First off, the Idol 4S Windows 10 doesn’t simply have a different operating system than its Android sibling, which I reviewed earlier this year. It also packs a more powerful Snapdragon processor, sharper camera, more RAM and storage, but uses weaker speakers and a lower-res full HD display.
That lower resolution was evident when I hunted down the walking dead in Zombie VR, where things like poles and seats in an abandoned subway car were clearly pixelated. The Android Idol didn’t have super smooth graphics either, but artifacts are more obvious on the Windows version.
The virtual reality experience was developed in-house by Alcatel, but Microsoft collaborated with the Chinese firm on testing for quality and compatibility. Microsoft didn’t seem to really play a part in implementing the VR, here. When asked what the company’s plans were for supporting such mobile virtual reality platforms, a Microsoft spokesperson said it looks forward to sharing more in the future. Meanwhile, what you have is a VR content store that Alcatel created, as well as an app called Tube 360, for discovering media.
The VR app store here is incredibly basic. It has two categories – Games and 360-degree Media. The former contains just seven titles right now, while the latter offers two immersive pictures and one video. That’s it. These are pulled from the Windows app store, and Alcatel said that it will add more content as it is created for the OS. Tube 360 is a preloaded third-party app that aggregates 360-degree content from YouTube and offers dozens more clips than the store does.
You can launch all these games and files directly from the Windows 10 All Apps menu, or start your VR adventure with the included launcher. It’s nearly identical to the one Alcatel made for the Android version, with the same seven icons floating in a horizontal row over a starry backdrop. The only difference I spotted was in the games: instead of using the on-goggles buttons to trigger actions, you’ll have to hold your cursor (by tilting your head) over special items or symbols until a ring fills up. It’s very Kinect-like, which will be intuitive for those who use that system, but is slower than tapping the physical keys on the headset.
In the game, I could only move my head around to aim my crosshair at attacking zombies. My in-game gun fired automatically whenever I lined up my target, and I had no say over when to shoot. If I could at least use the two buttons available on Alcatel’s goggles, I could actually pull the trigger myself, and use the other key to reload or navigate.

Another problem: sounds and music in the VR apps, including the games, will only play through the phone’s speakers. I tried plugging in three different types of headphones, and the audio still streamed out of the phone. This only affected VR content, media from other sources, such as YouTube or Spotify, flowed through the headphones. Alcatel said it’s aware of this issue, and that it’s working on an over-the-air app update as soon as possible. My Idol 4S Windows 10 was a pre-production unit, too, so here’s hoping that consumer-ready versions will ship with the fix in place.
Ultimately, it feels like Microsoft could have worked better with Alcatel on this attempt to make Windows 10 Mobile VR-ready. Even though the Android version was not crafted in partnership with Google, and Alcatel will likely need to adopt Daydream’s launcher at some point, it’s still a better-implemented experience. For a phone that targets “professionals, gamers and general tech enthusiasts alike,” according to the Windows blog announcing this device, the Idol 4S with Windows needs a more cohesive virtual reality launcher and content library. It will likely get better over time with more software updates, but as it stands, the VR part of this phone is not going to win over users.
Surface Book review (2016): The laptop to beat doesn’t come cheap
Last year, when Microsoft introduced its first-ever laptop, the Surface Book, the company proclaimed that this was the “ultimate laptop.” And it was — mostly. This two-in-one notebook offered long battery life, with a distinctive, well-constructed case, a comfortable keyboard, fast performance and a detachable display that worked well as a standalone pen tablet. Starting today, the company is shipping a refreshed version, and it’s mostly more of the same. The biggest changes are under the hood, with Microsoft claiming twice the graphics performance, a second fan and a larger battery, rated for either 12 or 16 hours, depending on the configuration. It’s more of a good thing, but do you need that kind of horsepower enough to spend $2,399 and up on one of these newer models?
Hardware
Like so many other second-generation devices, the refreshed Surface Book isn’t so much a “new product” as a refinement of the original that came before it. In this case, the exterior design is identical to the original, with none of the improvements visible to the naked eye. That’s both a good and a bad thing. To its credit, the Surface Book was always a striking piece of machinery, with its solidly built magnesium case, backlit keyboard and snake-like “fulcrum” hinge. Two generations in, I maintain that the chunky hinge doesn’t offer much of a functional advantage over conventional hinges — in fact, it makes the machine look fatter when shut. But it sure is pretty.
As ever, there’s a button on the function row, right next to the Delete key, that allows you to detach the screen from the keyboard base. From there you can use it as a tablet, or reattach the display facing outward and then fold it back to use as a sort of tabletop surface. Pressing the button to release the display still makes for a neat party trick, though lining up the docking guides when it’s time to reattach it to the base can feel slightly clumsy.
Indeed, I’ve wondered at times why Microsoft didn’t just rip Lenovo’s “Yoga” design and go with a 360-degree hinge that allows the screen to flip back into tablet mode. But the answer is obvious: At 3.34 pounds, the Surface Book and dock would make for one heavy tablet. Meanwhile, as it stands, the tablet portion weighs a scant 1.6 pounds, and that’s despite having a 13.5-inch screen and Core i7 processor inside. If you’re going to use a Windows PC in tablet mode, then, it may as well be like this.
But back to the total weight for a minute: The Surface Book feels heavier than I remember. That’s because it is — the second-gen model comes in at 3.68 pounds, up from 3.34 pounds on the original, and a good deal more than, say, the new three-pound MacBook Pro 13. As it turns out, I can forgive the weight, largely because the battery life is so phenomenal (much more on that in a moment).

Also, getting to test the new MacBook Pro recently has reaffirmed my preference for laptops with actual ports (i.e., ones I can use without an adapter). Whereas the MacBook Pro offers just two or four USB Type-C connections (depending on the configuration), the Surface Book still rocks two full-size USB 3.0 sockets, a Mini DisplayPort, a headphone jack and a full-size SDXC reader. If having a thicker, heavier machine means getting all the ports I need, along with potentially twice the battery life, I’m all in.
I’d also like to point out the proprietary magnetic power connector — the same one used on the last-gen Surface Book, as well as the last couple of Surface Pro tablets. I don’t like how much space the corresponding plug takes up, and I often find that it doesn’t stay put the first time I try to click it in. Also, the accompanying power brick is kind of heavy, but at least you can consider leaving it at home, what with the 16-hour battery life and all.
Finishing up our tour, there’s an 8-megapixel camera around back and a 5-megapixel one up front that supports Windows Hello facial recognition. More on that later.
In use

While I can manage the weight, however, I wish Microsoft would do something about the weight distribution. Though most of the weight is inside the keyboard dock, the 3:2-aspect-ratio screen is taller than most, which makes the machine feel slightly top-heavy when I rest it on my legs. Compounding matters, the touchscreen wobbles when poked. Rest assured, the notebook didn’t once tumble off my lap, but the base didn’t always feel as steady as I would have liked. One way to deal with this was to dip the display slightly forward, but that’s not my favorite screen position. The best angle for my eyes is the one where I push the panel back as far as possible, though this exacerbates the wobbliness. Womp, womp.
On the flip side, that 3:2 aspect ratio makes for a better standalone tablet experience. Indeed, Microsoft has designed its last few generations of Surface Pro and Surface Book devices with 3:2 screens precisely so that they’d have the same shape as a pad of paper. As ever, the pen comes included in the box and recognizes 1,024 levels of pressure sensitivity, even faint drags across the display. The pen has an eraser on top too, similar to a real No. 2 pencil. When you’re done, the pen attaches magnetically to the laptop’s right side.

Whether or not you decide to draw, and regardless of whether you’re using it in tablet or notebook mode, the Surface Book’s screen is lovely. That’s partly a matter of pixels — its 3,000 x 2,000 resolution translates to a pixel density of 267 ppi, which is slightly crisper than the 13-inch MacBook Pro’s Retina display. Beyond that, though, it’s just pretty to look at, with good contrast, pleasant white balance and a color gamut that covers the full sRGB spectrum. Just as important, that color and white balance holds up even when you adjust the screen angle (read: no washout here).
I’m a bit less impressed with the speakers: Though they’re loud, the sound quality is fairly forgettable. Passable for Spotify streaming, but not the best laptop audio I’ve enjoyed either.
To end this hardware section on a positive note, the keyboard and trackpad are the same as on last year’s model, and that is A-OK with me. At a time when Apple is going out of its way to make all of its keyboards shallower, the Surface Book’s cushy buttons feel refreshing. Not only did I type most of this review on it, but I also carried on with my normal workload, editing reviews, pounding out emails and so on. As before, though, my one complaint is that when I “pound” out said emails, I wish the keys would make less noise.
As for the trackpad, I happened to be testing the Surface Book at the same time as the newly updated HP Spectre x360, and the difference was stark. While HP’s touchpad is jumpy and occasionally unreliable, the Surface Book’s trackpad (made by Microsoft itself!) pretty much always does what I want it to, whether it’s drag the cursor across the screen, highlight text, scroll with two fingers or pinch to zoom.
Performance and battery life
Battery life
Surface Book with Perfomance Base (2016)
16:15
Surface Book (Core i5, integrated graphics)
13:54 / 3:20 (tablet only)
Surface Book (Core i7, discrete graphics)
11:31 / 3:02 (tablet only)
Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, 2015)
11:23
iPad Pro (12.9-inch, 2015)
10:47
HP Spectre x360 15t
10:17
HP Spectre x360 (13-inch, 2016)
10:03
ASUS ZenBook 3
9:45
Apple MacBook (2016)
8:45
Samsung Notebook 9
8:16
Dell XPS 13 (2015)
7:36
Microsoft Surface Pro 4
7:15
HP Spectre 13
7:07
Huawei MateBook
6:35
Dell XPS 15 (2016)
5:25 (7:40 with the mobile charger)
Make that “battery life and performance.” That’s right: I can’t wait to tell you guys about the long runtime here. Microsoft rates the new Surface Book’s battery for up to 16 hours of video playback. Though some other companies are sometimes guilty of embellishing, I have to say, Microsoft’s estimate here is on the nose. In my own test, in which I looped a video with the screen brightness fixed at 65 percent, the machine lasted a stunning 16 hours and 15 minutes. Just how long is that? Long enough for me to start the battery life test before going to bed on a Friday night and finding it still kicking when I woke up — and awake still when I returned from brunch later that afternoon.
To be clear, there’s barely anything else like this on the market. (I can remember a few machines that were advertised as having something like 20-hour battery life, but these all required a bolt-on slice battery and were aimed at corporate customers anyway.) If you’re shopping around, you’ll see Apple’s newest MacBook Pros have a rated battery life of 10 hours, not 16, and even then, I’m seeing around eight hours on the entry-level model I’ve been testing these past couple of weeks (full review coming soon). Even last year’s Surface Book had much “shorter” battery life, achieving 11 and a half hours with discrete graphics under the same testing conditions.
Just keep in mind that most of the Surface Book’s battery power is located in its keyboard base, which means you won’t get nearly the same mileage in tablet-only mode. With the keyboard detached, the machine lasted precisely four hours in the same video playback test. That’s an improvement over the first-gen Surface Book, which lasted between three and three and a half hours in tablet mode, depending on the processor. Obviously, you still shouldn’t expect to make it through a full workday without the keyboard base, but you should be able to watch a movie and still have some power left to spare.
| Surface Book (2016, 2.6GHz Core i7-6600U, 2GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M) | 5,452 | 4,041 | E8,083 / P5,980 / X2,228 | 11,362 | 1.71 GB/s / 1.26 GB/s |
| HP Spectre x360 (2016, 2.7GHz Core i7-7500U, Intel HD Graphics 620) | 5,515 | 4,354 | E2,656 / P1,720 / X444 | 3,743 | 1.76 GB/s / 579 MB/s |
| Surface Book (2.4GHz Core i5-6300U, Intel HD 520) | 5,412 | 3,610 |
E2,758 / P1,578 / X429 |
3,623 | 1.6 GB/s / 571 MB/s |
| Surface Book (2.6GHz Core i7-6600U, 1GB NVIDIA GeForce graphics) | 5,740 | 3,850 |
E4,122 / P2,696 |
6,191 | 1.55 GB/s / 608 MB/s |
| ASUS ZenBook 3 (2.7GHz Intel Core-i7-7500U, Intel HD 620) | 5,448 | 3,911 | E2,791 / P1,560 | 3,013 | 1.67 GB/s / 1.44 GB/s |
| HP Spectre 13 (2.5GHz Intel Core i7-6500U, Intel HD 520) | 5,046 | 3,747 | E2,790 / P1,630 / X375 | 3,810 | 1.61 GB/s / 307 MB/s |
| Dell XPS 13 (2.3GHz Core i5-6200U, Intel Graphics 520) | 4,954 | 3,499 | E2,610 / P1,531 | 3,335 | 1.6GB/s / 307 MB/s |
| Razer Blade Stealth (2.5GHz Intel Core i7-6500U, Intel HD 520) | 5,131 | 3,445 | E2,788 / P1,599 / X426 | 3,442 | 1.5 GB/s / 307 MB/s |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 (2.4GHz Core i5-6300U, Intel HD 520) | 5,403 | 3,602 |
E2,697/ P1,556/ X422 |
3,614 | 1.6 GB/s / 529 MB/s |
As I said, I tested the best configuration of the Surface Book that Microsoft has to offer: a $3,299 beast of a machine with a 2.6GHz dual-core i7-6600U processor, 16GB of RAM, a 2GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M GPU and 1TB solid-state drive. As you’d expect, the benchmark scores are very, very good. I’ve listed them above.
In particular, the Samsung-made disk drive was quick to copy files off a USB drive, but hard numbers might be more helpful to you there. In the ATTO test, I logged average max read speeds of 1.71 gigabytes per second, with writes topping out an average of 1.26 GB/s. That is hard, though not impossible, to find on a notebook these days — especially those write rates.
The Surface Book proved itself to be a fairly capable gaming machine too, thanks to its dedicated NVIDIA GeForce 965M graphics card. In Overwatch, senior editor and avid gamer Devindra saw speeds between 60 and 75 frames per second with medium-quality settings. Bumping up the resolution to 1,280 x 1,024, which suits the Surface Book’s screen size a bit better, dropped things down to around 45 frames per second. That’s playable, but not as silky smooth as 720p.

Unfortunately, Devindra couldn’t get the new Hitman title to get speeds beyond 5 fps via Steam, even at 720p. There’s likely some sort of driver issue causing that, and I’m hoping that Microsoft makes sure to give gamers access to the latest NVIDIA drivers. I couldn’t install the appropriate GeForce drivers from NVIDIA’s website, which makes me think there’s something special about the Surface Book’s configuration.
Throughout, the laptop mostly stayed cool. In fact, I sat for hours with it in my lap while I wrote this review. The only time I felt it heat up was when running graphics benchmarks, which isn’t surprising. I should note too that, while last year’s Surface Book took a credibility hit after reports of crashing, my experience was stable throughout. Here’s hoping you never see the ol’ Blue Screen of Death either.
In day-to-day use, the above specs were more than enough to keep up with my daily routine, which involves over a dozen open Chrome tabs, work in Google Docs and Sheets, Slack running in the background, and a near continuous stream of music from the Spotify desktop app. Boot-up was brisk too — it took about nine seconds to get to the Windows Hello screen, and around three for the machine to approve me and let me in.

Speaking of the sort, that front-facing 5-megapixel camera generally did a good job recognizing me, though it failed just about every time I happened to have eyeglasses on. Assuming I was wearing contacts, however, and remembered to look at the camera, not the blank screen in front of me, the Surface Book was quick to recognize me. When it didn’t, I entered a PIN code, which is still more convenient than entering a password.
Configuration options
As of this writing, the last-gen Surface Book is still listed on Microsoft’s online store, starting at $1,499 with a Core i5 processor, 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. Just so you know, that was the same starting price a year ago, so spending that kind of money for an already outdated machine might not be the smartest move.
To get one of the brand-new configurations, you’ll have to pay a lot more: at least $2,399. For that price, you get a Core i7 processor, 8GB of RAM and a 128GB solid-state drive. For $2,799, you can double both the storage and the memory, and get a 512GB drive paired with 16GB of RAM. Lastly, there’s the top-of-the-line edition that I tested, which steps up to a full terabyte of storage. That costs $3,299.
The competition
Obviously, the Surface Book is competing with the MacBook Pro. And that’s not just because I keep saying so in this review — Microsoft has a “Compare to Mac” page on its online store, and Apple went out of its way to unveil its new MacBook Pros the day after the Surface Book launch, which I don’t think was a coincidence.
I’ve already addressed some of the tradeoffs of the Surface Book vs. MacBook Pro, but to summarize: The Surface Book is considerably heavier but offers much longer battery life and a wider array of ports (including full-size ones) and is available with discrete graphics, which the 13-inch MacBook Pro is not. (Only the 15-inch model has a dedicated GPU.) The MacBook Pro is thinner and lighter, has better audio and has a lower starting price of $1,299 with key specs similar to what you’d get on the entry-level $1,499 Surface Book. In any case, I’ll soon have a review of both MacBook Pros, at which point I’ll be able to bring this comparison full circle.
Other than the MacBook Pro, it’s hard to find something that competes with the Surface Book quite as directly. Dell has its high-end (and well-reviewed) XPS line, but only the 15-inch model ($1,000-plus) has discrete graphics. The XPS 13 ($800 and up) remains one of Engadget’s favorite laptops, but we only recommend it for people who can settle for integrated Intel graphics. It’s a similar story with HP, whose 13-inch Spectre x360 is one of our favorite laptops but doesn’t offer the kind of horsepower you can find in the Surface Book. ASUS’s ZenBook Pro UX501VW has discrete graphics, but its 15-inch form factor means it weighs a lot more: 4.54 pounds, to be precise.
Wrap-up

The new Surface Book is but a minor upgrade over the original, but that’s still enough to help it hold its rank as one of the best laptops available. Yes, there are some purpose-built notebooks that are still better at certain things: gaming PCs that are better at gaming, and ultraportables that are better at … being portable.
But taken as a whole, the Surface Book continues to offer a remarkable all-around experience, ticking off not all, but many, boxes for many shoppers. That includes fast performance, premium design, long battery life, a great screen, a comfortable keyboard, a relatively decent selection of ports and even a smooth trackpad. Yes, you will pay for the privilege of using it, but there also isn’t anything else quite like it.
Devindra Hardawar and Aaron Souppouris contributed to this review
Microsoft patches Google-outed Windows security hole
As promised, Microsoft has issued a fix for the Windows security flaw that Google disclosed before a patch was ready. The update tackles vulnerabilities in numerous versions of Windows (from Vista through Windows 10) that would let an attacker get control of your system through a malicious app. You’re already safe if you use Windows 10 Anniversary Update and an up-to-date browser, we’d add — this is for people who can’t or won’t move to a newer operating system.
You have a strong incentive to upgrade quickly if you’re affected. The attack is known to have been used by hacking group Strontium for a low-intensity but targeted phishing campaign. It’s not certain that other organizations used the hole, but you likely don’t want to find out about new attacks first-hand.
The patch ends a brief but tumultuous episode between Google and Microsoft. Google published details of the flaw after learning that it was already being used for real-world attacks, but Microsoft criticized the move as irresponsible. It put users at “potential risk” by making it easier for malware writers, the Windows creator said. Whether or not that’s true, the question is whether or not the two sides are taking steps to minimize these issues in the future — ideally, any security disclosure comes with a patch ready and waiting.
Via: ZDNet
Source: Microsoft
It sounds like Microsoft has shelved its Xbox streaming stick
Prior to Microsoft’s keynote at E3 this year, a raft of rumors were swirling about. Microsoft’s answer to the PlayStation 4 Pro (which we now know as Project Scorpio) and the Xbox One S garnered most of the attention, but loose lips also suggested an Xbox-branded streaming dongle was in the works as well. The Chromecast-like device would’ve streamed Windows 10 apps and “light Universal Windows Platform” games in addition to content from an Xbox One. It would cost $99 according to Windows Central. Not anymore, however.
“Project Hobart” (apparently the cool sounding codenames are reserved for gaming hardware), was pushed under the rug ahead of E3 to focus on the Xbox One S and revealing next year’s high-end Xbox One, Project Scorpio. As WC tells it, Microsoft was going to order 300,000 units of the device and it’d release shortly after E3. Furthermore, Microsoft was apparently forced to prematurely reveal Scorpio after Sony spilled its guts to the Financial Times about PlayStation 4 Pro, just ahead of gaming’s grand gala.
That last bit makes a lot of sense considering Microsoft has said close to nothing about the console in terms of real information, and chose to rattle off system specs and video of a motherboard instead of a console and games in June.
But this isn’t all. The company apparently scrapped a few non-Xbox devices ahead of last month’s Surface Studio event as well, according to The Verge. CEO Satya Nadella reportedly cancelled a Surface Mini tablet at the last minute, in addition to an Amazon Echo-like device that would feature the Cortana digital assistant.
Again, these are all reports with no official confirmation from Microsoft, so there’s still the chance that we could see any of the aforementioned devices at some point in the future.
Via: The Verge
Source: Windows Central
Facebook wants a piece of LinkedIn’s job recruiting features
After seeing businesses and employers post ad hoc job openings on their Facebook pages, the massive social network is finally experimenting with job recruitment tools in earnest. As TechCrunch reports today, Facebook is testing out a new “Jobs” tab for business pages alongside an “Apply Now” button for applicants that will start filling out a job application with information from the user’s Facebook profile.
That Jobs tab acts as a landing page where businesses can send potential new hires and interested folks rather than directing them to a jobs page on their own website or a third-party job board. Users looking to get their foot in the door at a specific company could also subscribed to that company’s Facebook page to get notified about future openings. Businesses will also be able to pay to post their openings in the News Feed for additional reach or laser-focused targeting to reach people with the right credentials.
From the job applicant’s side, the “Apply Now” button will save users the trouble of entering resumé details and job history information, similar to how other job board sites already use Facebook Connect. On the other hand, that feature might be less appealing to users who like to keep their professional and personal lives separate on social media. When a user does apply, the application is sent in to the business in the same way as a normal Facebook message, which could get a little messy for companies that handle a large volume of customer support requests through Facebook. With nearly four times as many users as LinkedIn, Facebook offers a much larger pool of potential applicants — many of whom might not even know their next job was out there looking for them.
Source: TechCrunch
Xbox Insider Program opens its previews to everyone
The Xbox Preview Program has been helpful for gamers who want to see the future of Microsoft’s console software before it’s finished, but Microsoft thinks it can do better. It’s renaming the offering to the Xbox Insider Program, and instituting key changes both to the software as well as availability. For most people, the biggest change is simply who can access the program — it’ll “soon” be open to anyone with an Xbox. Access to system updates is still limited to those already participating, but that won’t preclude you from getting sneak peeks for apps and games so long as you meet qualifications (such as your region or tenure in the program).
You should notice more than a few changes in the Preview Dashboard, too. There’s a new user interface (based on the current Xbox One UI) that helps you find info and provide more detailed feedback. Also, it’s much more personalized: you should see more relevant news and chances at early access. There’s an Insider profile card that highlights your efforts, and multiple users can finally offer feedback from one console. Finally, your roommate won’t be left out of the loop.
The Insider Program software changes start arriving today, although you’ll have to be one of the most active contributors to be part of the first wave. Everyone enrolled in the program should see the updates within the next few weeks.
Source: Xbox Wire
Former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer Admits He Was Wrong About the iPhone
In a new Bloomberg interview with Steve Ballmer, the former Microsoft CEO revisited his famously dismissive remarks about the iPhone when it launched back in 2007.
Shortly after Steve Jobs revealed the first iPhone, then-Microsoft CEO Ballmer was asked what he thought of the device during a press conference.
500 dollars? Fully subsidized? With a plan? I said that is the most expensive phone in the world. And it doesn’t appeal to business customers because it doesn’t have a keyboard. Which makes it not a very good email machine. … Right now, we’re selling millions and millions and millions of phones a year. Apple is selling zero phones a year. In six months, they’ll have the most expensive phone by far ever in the marketplace.
Speaking to interviewer Emily Chang recently, however, Ballmer praised Apple’s cellular subsidy model and admitted he wished he had come up with it first.
I wish I had thought of the model of subsidizing phones through the operators. People like to point to this quote where I said the iPhones will never sell. Well the price of $600 or $700 was too high and it was business model innovation by Apple to get it essentially built into the monthly cell phone bill.
Ballmer also admitted it was a mistake for Microsoft not to make handsets and tablets sooner. “I would have moved into the hardware business faster and recognized that what we had in the PC, where there was a separation of chips, systems, and software, wasn’t largely going to reproduce itself in the mobile world,” he said.
Steve Ballmer is asked about Apple’s iPhone in 2007
Ballmer revealed his decision to take Microsoft into the hardware business contributed to the breakdown of his relationship with co-founder Bill Gates. “There was a fundamental disagreement about how important it was to be in the hardware business,” Ballmer said. “I had pushed Surface. The board had been a little reluctant in supporting it. And then things came to a climax around what to do about the phone business.”
Microsoft entered the hardware market in 2012 with the Surface RT tablet, which sold poorly and saw the company take a $900 million charge to write down the value of inventory. Since then, Microsoft’s Surface range has taken off, and generated more than $4 billion in sales for the company for the fiscal year ending June 2016.
Tag: Microsoft
Discuss this article in our forums
Windows Store ‘CoD’ buyers can’t play with Steam friends
Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare and Modern Warfare Remastered have come to the Windows 10 Store, but you may want to think twice about buying the games there. According to Activision, those versions don’t support console cross-play, and won’t even work with versions on other PC platforms like Steam. In other words, you’ll only be able to play with other Windows 10 Store buyers and not the millions of players who bought the game elsewhere. They aren’t part of the Xbox Play Anywhere program either, meaning you’ll be stuck with the Universal Windows Platform (UWP) version on Windows 10.
Developers like Epic have complained about the closed nature of the Windows 10 Store, but the Call of Duty restrictions apparently aren’t Microsoft’s fault. Windows Central reports that the decision to separate the UWP game from other Windows platform players was made entirely by Activision. Microsoft affirmed that it supports device and platform cross-play “for partners who want to enable it.”
Though the lack of cross-play is Activision’s decision, users have complained about other aspects of UWP games, like the lack of multi GPU support for SLI or Crossfire, and no support for unlocked frame rates. However, Microsoft recently unlocked frame rates for UWP games and launched MultiGPU support for DirectX 12 games like Rise of the Tomb Raider. It’ll have to do more to open up the platform, though — if buyers see nothing but downsides, they’ll simply buy elsewhere.
Via: Windows Central
Source: Activision



