Blind Camera Shootout – the winner is…

If you’ve been following the homepage over the past week, you’ll have seen we published a big blind smartphone camera shootout to find out how the new Sony Xperia Z5 camera compares to the iPhone 6S, Galaxy Note 5 and the LG G4. Like our past blind camera shootout, we didn’t tell you which device took each image and today, we’re revealing the results – which smartphones takes the crown?

The cameras in numbers…

Before we reveal the results, let’s recap the various camera specs of each smartphone:

	Sony Xperia Z5	Galaxy Note 5	LG G4	Apple iPhone 6S
Resolution:	23MP (5520×4140)	16MP (5312×2988)	16MP (5312×2988)	12MP (4032×3024)
Focus:	Hybrid AF	Autofocus	Laser Autofocus	Phase Detection AF
Flash:	dual LED	dual LED	dual LED	dual LED
Manual controls?	Yes	Yes	Yes	partial
Aperture:	f/2.0	f/1.9	f/1.8	f/2.2
Focal Length:	24mm	28mm	28mm	29mm
Camera Sensor Size:	1/2.3″	1/2.6″	1/2.6″	1/3″
Pixel Size:	TBC	1.12µm	1.12µm	1.22µm
Stabilisation: Features:	Effective Stabilisation	OIS	OIS Colour Spectrum Sensor	Digital Image Stabilisation
Front Camera	5MP	5MP	8MP	5MP

Numbers are only one part of the equation and while you could make a decision on which is best just based on the specs, we all know that cameras and images are about more than megapixels, and algorithms and processing play a large part. Clear your mind, settle down and let’s check out which smartphone camera really is the best.

The Galleries:

Let’s take a look at each gallery again and discuss which smartphone took the best shot. Before we do that however, it’s time to reveal which device is which:

• Phone A = Sony Xperia Z5
• Phone B = LG G4
• Phone C = Apple iPhone 6S
• Phone D = Samsung Galaxy Note 5

Now, let’s look through the galleries:

Gallery 1

This shootout proved to be interesting as it tested how each smartphone camera handled the change between a colour-rich subject and a sky with various shades of grey. No smartphone was able to capture the sky in all its details but the iPhone 6S seemed to handle the transition between light and dark the best.

#gallery-1
margin: auto;

#gallery-1 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-1 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-1 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 2

This gallery combined an interesting collection of tests; from the varying sky colours to the detail of the individual tree leaves, the sign in the foreground and the building details and colours to the right.

The Note 5 wins this test as it handles the sky well, produces a good amount of detail in the sign and has clarity in the tree outline. The LG G4 and the Xperia Z5 come second and third respectively as they both produce good all round images while the iPhone 6S comes fourth as it overcompensates for the white balance in the image.

#gallery-2
margin: auto;

#gallery-2 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-2 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-2 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 3

This gallery was designed to see how each smartphone handles the details and colours in and on the shop front as well as the details in the shop signs and the reflections in the windows.

The Xperia Z5 wins this shootout as it produces a saturated image with deep colours that is closest the image produced by the EOS 70D. Next up is the Galaxy Note 5, which slightly overcompensates for the light but still captures details, while the iPhone 6S comes third and the washed out LG G4 rounds off this gallery.

#gallery-3
margin: auto;

#gallery-3 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-3 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-3 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 4

As pointed out in the comments on the original shootout, the wide angle of the Xperia Z5 lets it down here. When evaluating this gallery, we zoomed into the Apostrophe sign, the detail on the ladies’ hair and the grille at the end of this feature.

The winner is the LG G4, which handles the range of colours better than its rivals. The others are quite close with the Xperia Z5 adding a slight hue to an otherwise good image, the iPhone 6S handling the colours in the scene quite well and the Galaxy Note 5 offering impressive detail even if colours are a little saturated.

#gallery-4
margin: auto;

#gallery-4 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-4 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-4 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 5

This gallery was an interesting test as it evaluated how each smartphone handled the colours in the two different LED signs, as well as the detail of the door stand, which can be seen just past the front door.

Each smartphone handled the scene differently and the winner is the Galaxy Note 5, which comes closest to the EOS 70D image with detail and accurate colours throughout. Next up is the iPhone 6S which offers great colour reproduction in the signs and this is followed by the LG G4. The Xperia Z5 brings up the rear as it over compensates for the light and hence, the signs are almost washed out.

#gallery-5
margin: auto;

#gallery-5 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-5 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-5 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 6

While shots of scenery and subjects are always great, it doesn’t quite cover how each smartphone handles the contours and detail of a human face. This gallery aims to test just this as well as looking at the amount of bokeh in the details on the wall and mirror behind.

This proved to be a test of two halves with the Galaxy Note 5 narrowly beating the LG G4 to the top spot followed by the Xperia Z5 narrowly pushing the iPhone 6S into last place. In particular, the Xperia Z5 would have probably done a lot better had it been in oversampling mode and the iPhone 6S seems to get the white balance all wrong.

#gallery-6
margin: auto;

#gallery-6 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-6 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-6 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 7

For this gallery, the blue sky and amount of detail in the buildings was an interesting test of how good each smartphone’s HDR mode was. From the detail in the rooftops to the Breitling sign at the bottom of the scene and the Itsu sign in the immediate foreground, there’s a lot of detail to capture.

The iPhone 6S wins this with the Galaxy Note 5 very close behind as the sky is a little less saturated than on Apple’s flagship. The Xperia Z5 comes third over the LG G4, mainly because the latter produced a darker image and Sony managed to more accurately reproduce the colour of the sky.

#gallery-7
margin: auto;

#gallery-7 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-7 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-7 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 8

Almost the same scene as the above, this gallery used the red telephone box as the subject of the photo. When evaluating this, we looked for reproduction of details on and in the box, the clarity of the Itsu shop sign to the left and the amount of bokeh in the background details.

The Galaxy Note 5 wins this just for its reproduction of details inside the iconic telephone box while the LG G4 and the iPhone 6S tie for second, as the latter captures the details in the background better and the former is better at reproducing the white balance of the scene. Sony’s Xperia Z5 comes a very close fourth as a seeming lack of stabilisation results in some noise in the image.

#gallery-8
margin: auto;

#gallery-8 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-8 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-8 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 9

This was an interesting test as the flags had varying amounts of detail, the buildings were detailed and intricate and the sky can be just seen to the left. The Xperia Z5 has a good reproduction of the overall scene but lacks detail when you zoom into the image.

The LG G4 captures the scene well and captures good detail of the brickwork on the building while the iPhone 6S is slightly darker but does better at capturing the sky. The Galaxy Note 5 is very similar to the LG G4 as it captures the scene well including details in the brickwork but lacks depth when you zoom into the image even slights. It’s too close to call a winner in this gallery.

#gallery-9
margin: auto;

#gallery-9 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-9 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-9 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 10

This was an interesting gallery as it kicked off the low light testing with a combination of varying colours, intricate detail and bright lights. The Galaxy Note 5 probably wins this for the amount of detail captured even though the colour reproduction isn’t quite accurate.

Beyond this, the LG G4 comes second for the amount of detail captured and even though it is slightly noisy, the Xperia Z5 comes third with the iPhone 6S last thanks to inaccurate white balance. Interestingly, the Xperia Z5 would probably win this or come very close when used in oversampling mode.

#gallery-10
margin: auto;

#gallery-10 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-10 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-10 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 11

A combination a dark shop sign and a low light cream building above made an interesting test of each smartphone’s ability to handle low light conditions. The Xperia Z5 overcompensated for a lack of light resulting in a bright image but a lack of detail in the overall image.

The Galaxy Note 5 and the LG G4 tie for first place here as the overall image is almost identical from each of these devices and the iPhone 6S completely misjudges the white balance resulted in a dark image that fails to capture all the details.

#gallery-11
margin: auto;

#gallery-11 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-11 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-11 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 12

The last two galleries combine to form a test of the overall night shot capability of each handset. The first gallery is the scene captured with no flash and the second gallery takes the same scene but applies the inbuilt flash of each device.

As far as details in the image go, the Xperia Z5 is the best of all four devices as, although the iPhone 6S produces a lighter image, Sony’s best captures more details. The Galaxy Note 5 comes third and the LG G4 comes fourth, although it’s worth noting that the ISO is set quite low on both of these devices (although all handsets were set to auto mode) and they would produce much better images with a higher ISO.

#gallery-12
margin: auto;

#gallery-12 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-12 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-12 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 13

Now to the final gallery – which smartphone has the strongest and most accurate flash? The EOS 70D has a significant advantage thanks to its Xenon flash and while companies such as Nokia have used Xenon in the past, a dual/triple LED flash is the common standard as it can be used for both photos and videos (Xenon cannot be used while video recording).

The LG G4 and the Galaxy Note 5 tie for first place here as the former reproduces details better (albeit with a slight hue) while the latter captures the light better but lacks somewhat in the details. Sony’s Xperia Z5 comes a close third and the iPhone 6S rounds off this shootout in a lowly fourth place.

The results:

Now to the results – which device wins the shootout? Here’s how the voting stands at the end of this shootout:

(function ()
var opst = document.createElement(‘script’);
var os_host = document.location.protocol == “https:” ? “https:” : “http:”;
opst.type = ‘text/javascript’;
opst.async = true;
opst.src = os_host + ‘//’ + ‘www.opinionstage.com/polls/2300099/embed.js’;
(document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0] ());

It turned out to be quite a close-run race between the iPhone 6S and the Galaxy Note 5 for the title but Apple’s latest just beat Samsung’s latest with 38.2 and 34.1 percent of the 7810 votes respectively. Sony’s Xperia Z5 comes in third with 17.7 percent of votes while the LG G4 brings up the rear with 10 percent of all the votes.

As mentioned in the original gallery post, all the settings were at their maximum resolution, which proved to be detrimental to the Xperia Z5 (which relies on the 8MP oversampling mode for its best shots). We’ll be retesting these smartphones along with a few others in the big camera shootout in the coming weeks so stay tuned! Let us know what you thought about these results in the comments below guys and head over to the original shootout post for all the galleries.

Blind camera shootout – Xperia Z5 vs LG G4 vs Galaxy Note 5 vs iPhone 6S

With every announcement of a new flagship, we hear companies claim that they have improved and advanced their camera and it is the best they’ve ever put, and there’s a good reason for that: for many people, smartphones have become the only camera they need.

In the case of Sony, LG, Samsung and Apple, each company has promised improved cameras in its latest flagship smartphones, but do any of them come close to matching a dedicated camera? Have we finally reached the stage where a smartphone can beat a DSLR camera?

To test this, we took our trusty Canon EOS 70D (with a 18-55m Sigma f/2.8 lens) into London along with the cameras found on the Sony Xperia Z5, LG G4, Samsung Galaxy Note 5 and the Apple iPhone 6S. Read on to find out who wins.

Like our previous blind camera shootout, we’re not telling you which smartphone took each image but this time, we have an image from the Canon EOS 70D as a control shot. When deciding which smartphone camera is the best, refer to the control image and vote for which you think is the closest.

N.B. As the Xperia Z5 comes with HDR turned on by default (and no way to turn it off unless you switch to manual mode), all phones had Auto HDR turned on by default. The EOS 70D images were edited post-capture to reflect HDR and are most representative of the scene. All the images captured have been cropped to 16×9 aspect ratio.

The cameras in numbers…

Before we run through the various galleries, let’s take a quick look at the various camera specs of each smartphone:

	Sony Xperia Z5	Galaxy Note 5	LG G4	Apple iPhone 6S
Resolution:	23MP (5520×4140)	16MP (5312×2988)	16MP (5312×2988)	12MP (4032×3024)
Focus:	Hybrid AF	Autofocus	Laser Autofocus	Phase Detection AF
Flash:	dual LED	dual LED	dual LED	dual LED
Manual controls?	Yes	Yes	Yes	partial
Aperture:	f/2.0	f/1.9	f/1.8	f/2.2
Focal Length:	24mm	28mm	28mm	29mm
Camera Sensor Size:	1/2.3″	1/2.6″	1/2.6″	1/3″
Pixel Size:	TBC	1.12µm	1.12µm	1.22µm
Stabilisation: Features:	Effective Stabilisation	OIS	OIS Colour Spectrum Sensor	Digital Image Stabilisation
Front Camera	5MP	5MP	8MP	5MP

Numbers are only one part of the equation and while you could make a decision on which is best just based on the specs, we all know that cameras and images are about more than megapixels, and algorithms and processing play a large part. Clear your mind, settle down and let’s check out which smartphone camera really is the best.

Let the voting begin:

For each of the galleries below, you’ll find the EOS 70D image as the control shot beneath the gallery title and then you’ll find the four smartphone images in this order in the gallery beneath it: Phone A, Phone B, Phone C and Phone D. The same smartphone took each picture throughout the comparison; i.e. phone A is the same throughout all and so on.

Gallery 1

Taking a look at this image, we can see a contrast between the sky and the buildings. Do pay attention to the detail in the building on the left of the scene.

#gallery-1
margin: auto;

#gallery-1 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-1 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-1 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 2

For this image, the tree was the focus of every image but the real question was, how much detail could each smartphone capture in the sign on the left of the image and the sky. The results are certainly interesting…

#gallery-2
margin: auto;

#gallery-2 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-2 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-2 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 3

This test certainly proved interesting as it tested not only the ability of each smartphone to handle the myriad of colours in the shop front but also the reflections and, most importantly, the level of details and the colours inside the shop through the front door. Let’s see how the phones performed…

#gallery-3
margin: auto;

#gallery-3 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-3 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-3 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 4

This proved to be an interesting test, not only for the unique view but also the level of detail captured in the grille at the end, the apostrophe restaurant sign in the near background and the tree, sky and building in the background. Lots of details, which phone did best?

#gallery-4
margin: auto;

#gallery-4 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-4 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-4 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 5

From a shop that’s open for business to one that’s closed for the day and this is an interesting test as it reveals how each smartphone handles neon lights, contrasts and of course, reflections. Which do you think manages best with such a myriad of different colours and focal points?

#gallery-5
margin: auto;

#gallery-5 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-5 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-5 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 6

From outdoor shots to capturing the human face in all its detail and this is where a lot of smartphones can often be found out. After all, everyone likes to take images of themselves or their group so it’s definitely something that’s worth testing. Look, not only for colours and facial features but also the detail in the background and in the mirror.

#gallery-6
margin: auto;

#gallery-6 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-6 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-6 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 7

Another test and this time, questioning how each handset handles the varying lighting in the sky coupled with the level of detail in the buildings. Which phone blows out the sky and which captures the scene in stunning detail?

#gallery-7
margin: auto;

#gallery-7 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-7 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-7 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 8

It wouldn’t be a camera shootout in London without an iconic photo of a London phone box and there’s nothing more to say other than look, not only for details and colours in the phone box itself but also the background and the Itsu restaurant details on the left.

#gallery-8
margin: auto;

#gallery-8 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-8 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-8 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 9

Another stapleton of the upper echelons of London society and the iconic Claridges. As you can see this image was captured at a distance so look for details in the buildings and particular, details on the various flags. Which do you think handles this shoot best?

#gallery-9
margin: auto;

#gallery-9 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-9 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-9 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 10

From daylight to low light and a test of handling different colours; this is Selfridges on Oxford Street at night and there’s a lot of detail on show in the various columns and the iconic design itself. Look for which smartphone handles the detail in the buildings coupled with the colour the best.

#gallery-10
margin: auto;

#gallery-10 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-10 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-10 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 11

Another low light shot and this one looks at handling the contrast between black and light, with the Adidas store sign lit up and the building above it quite dark. Which phone over compensates the darkness and which comes closest to the EOS 70D?

#gallery-11
margin: auto;

#gallery-11 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-11 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-11 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 12

To our last two galleries and these are linked. First, we’ve got an image captured in almost darkness without the flash on and we’re looking at detail in the two statues as well as the cement bricks, fence in the background and the overall scene. The results are definitely interesting…

#gallery-12
margin: auto;

#gallery-12 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-12 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-12 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Gallery 13

The final gallery brings you the same exact scene as the previous gallery but this time we’ve fired up the flash to test how each smartphone’s reflective flash works in almost darkness. Again, look for clarity and detail in the overall scene as well as colours in the statues, cement bricks and the fence. Which smartphone will reign supreme as the king of darkness?

#gallery-13
margin: auto;

#gallery-13 .gallery-item
float: left;
margin-top: 10px;
text-align: center;
width: 25%;

#gallery-13 img
border: 2px solid #cfcfcf;

#gallery-13 .gallery-caption
margin-left: 0;

/* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */

Which do YOU think is the best?

We could reveal which image took each picture but to ensure there is no bias, we want you to look at each image and then decide which you think is the best. Once you’ve decided, vote for your favourite in the poll below and be sure to let us know which you voted for (and why) in the comments below.

Like the last blind comparison, you’re welcome to guess at which phone is which but of course, we won’t confirm which is which until the results in roughly a weeks’ time. Get voting guys and why not share this using the links at the bottom so we can get more opinions on which is best!

(function ()
var opst = document.createElement(‘script’);
var os_host = document.location.protocol == “https:” ? “https:” : “http:”;
opst.type = ‘text/javascript’;
opst.async = true;
opst.src = os_host + ‘//’ + ‘www.opinionstage.com/polls/2300099/embed.js’;
(document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0] ());