Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘Google’

18
Aug

How we trained AI to be sexist


You’d never know from Jacqueline Feldman’s background that she’d become a passionate proponent of gender equality for artificial intelligence. She went the dreamer’s route at college, attending Yale for English literature and writing. She prefers casual dresses and writing from the comfort of her Brooklyn apartment surrounded by books, where she has the option of climbing to the roof for cool air on sweltering nights.

But once Feldman was hired to write the personality of a chatbot for Kasisto, a startup that focuses on artificial intelligence software for banks, she became vocal about the importance of taking gender out of the identity equation. Under her watch, MyKai, the bot she was hired to craft a personality for, would be neither female nor male.

Feldman’s boss at Kasisto, Dror Oren, says the work the team has done with the bot made him more outspoken about the need for equality in tech than he’d have imagined going into the project, and he’s a self-proclaimed feminist to begin with. Now, he’s hyperaware of the differences between the personality of Kai and overly feminine answers inside similar products made by most large tech companies.

Kasisto is on to something. There’s Apple’s Siri, which the company occasionally promotes with titillating commercials reinforcing gender stereotypes, like the one where Jamie Foxx flirts with the female virtual assistant, asking if she has a crush on him. There’s Amazon’s Alexa, which the company introduced in a roll-out video featuring a “man of the house” explaining all of the feminized assistant’s functions, while his fictional wife asks one question and gets chastised for it. And then there’s Amy, a bot that schedules meetings via emails that’s made by x.ai. The company proclaims on its site that Amy is asked out about once a month, which the company says makes it “blush.”

Play with any of those products and you’ll find the same flirty attitude promoting the gender stereotypes that make equal-treatment folks irate. Ask it to marry you and Alexa will say, “Sorry, I’m not the marrying type” or “let’s just be friends” to date requests. If you ask Siri “Who’s your daddy?” it will answer “You are…” before asking to get back to work. Microsoft’s Cortana sassily replies, “Of all the questions you could have asked,” to come-ons, something feminists will tell you makes the bot complacent in its harassment.

Kai, on the other hand, will tell users via text to stop bothering it or say it’s time to get back to banking.

Sure, many of those other companies now have a male-voice option, but those aren’t the defaults in the US, and when producing commercials for those products, the female voice is the star of the show.

Feldman says all this sexualized AI can be harmful to society.

“Some of these female-gendered personalities have what are called Easter eggs programmed into them,” said Feldman. “These are supposed to be surprising moments in the interaction, and they’re often jokes that are somewhat demeaning to the personality speaking with you.”

She adds: “If you tried that conversation on a real woman, you’d really be bothering her.”

That’s not to say Easter eggs shouldn’t exist; they’re one of the delights of AI. But rather than demeaning through a typically sexist or flirty joke, Kai will make self-aware jokes about not being alive. If you text it goodbye, it may reply, “That is the X in the top right, right?” When asked if it believes in love, Kai will respond, “Love throws me for a loop. Unconditional love is an infinite loop,” which is a nod to what happens when computers freeze. These sorts of answers make Kai distinctly artificial, not human.

Women continue to earn 79 cents for every dollar a man earns, and it certainly wouldn’t hurt their standing in society if the tech world at least thought more carefully about gender in AI. The stereotypically ladylike, deferential responses of so many virtual assistants reinforce society’s subconscious link between women and servitude. The average person’s only interaction with AI may be a female voice that can’t quite say “no, stop that,” and that’s not OK.

Even those that avoid being overly feminized, like Google’s voice assistant, aren’t entirely gender-free. Google’s lacks a girls name, but still has a woman’s voice. Those in the field will often point to findings like those of now-deceased Stanford professor Clifford Nass, who said people prefer the sound of a woman’s voice to a man’s.

Kasisto was able to avoid some of these tech landmines because Kai’s personality has to be conveyed only by the written word. But the company isn’t buying the idea that society simply prefers a female voice as a reason to keep feminized personalities in a strictly assistant role. In fact, they say, mixing up gender in artificial intelligence in tech would be good for everyone. Companies are clearly thinking about it on some level; for example, in the UK and France, Siri defaults to a man’s voice, unlike the woman’s voice we hear in the US.

“I don’t want to sound pretentious around it, but I think they [ other companies ] need to think seriously about how they’re designing bots,” said Oren, Feldman’s boss and co-founder at Kasisto. “I feel that we’re putting Kasisto values out there. We want to feel proud with the way our bot interacts because it reflects our values as a company.”

Amazon and Google declined to comment for this story, and Apple didn’t respond to requests for an interview. Deborah Harrison, one of Microsoft’s personality writers for Cortana, says the team considered benefits to either gender when beginning to craft the personal assistant but settled on female because they felt women are perceived as being more helpful than men. Still, she said they felt the weight of their decisions.

“This industry — digital assistants and AI research — is in many ways in its infancy, so the interactions we design now will, for better or worse, begin to become standardized through familiarity,” Harrison said via email.

Dr. Olga Russakovsky, a postdoctoral research fellow at the Robotics Institute at Carnegie Mellon, was spurred to action by how tech treats women, period. She told Engadget she started a computer-science camp for girls called SAILORS while at Stanford because of the disproportionately low number of women in the field. In 2011, only 18 percent of bachelor’s degrees and 20 percent of doctoral degrees in computer and information sciences were earned by women.

When designing the camp program, she tailored it to how girls learn, as opposed to conventional programs that tend to favor boys. Part of the problem with sexism in artificial intelligence appears to be that there aren’t enough women involved in its creation.

Russakovsky applauds work by anyone in artificial intelligence who tries to create an environment that includes women as equal beings. This isn’t about an overly PC society getting its dander up over nothing. One study she cites found there is a hidden gender bias within a large sample of news text, randomly sampled, online. She worries these subservient values will grow more entrenched over time, keeping women underrepresented in her field.

It’s possible that some of the loudest criticism of personalities like Cortana (which was initially based on a nude video-game character) has had some effect at large tech companies. Apple added a male voice option to Siri in 2013, two years after Siri was introduced. And personal scheduling software company x.ai introduced a male option a year ago, after debuting with female-only Amy.

But even these maddeningly slow additions might do little to actually reverse sexism within the very DNA of artificial personalities.

Until more people in computer science ‘fess up to the problem of overly sexualized bots, we seem doomed to travel along the same rutted tracks of homogeneous design, with too few women involved in the development of our Siris, Amys, Cortanas and Alexas. That leaves the small teams at companies like Kasisto at the forefront, dragging AI into a more inclusive world. Here’s hoping their colleagues at larger companies wake up and do the same.

18
Aug

Chrome extension restores the backspace key to its former glory


Lots of very smart people work at Google, but that doesn’t mean they’re immune from making decisions that piss people off. Consider this recent Chrome kerfuffle: some users were recently shocked to discover that, upon updating Chrome, they could no longer tap the backspace key to go back a page. Mild panic, and lots of comments, ensued. If that sounds an awful lot like you, well, you can dial down the anguish a little — Google released a Chrome extension called Go Back With Backspace that does exactly what its name implies.

“Many people lost their progress while working online by accidentally pressing backspace and leaving a page,” the extension’s description explains. “So we removed the feature from Chrome, and created this extension for those who prefer the old behavior.”

“Old behavior” is right. A little sleuthing on StackExchange has confirmed that the “backspace to go back” behavior didn’t exist in Mosaic and Netscape Navigator, two early and widely-used web browsers. If anything, looks like the behavior might have begun when Internet Explorer inherited the backspace trick from Windows Explorer in 1995, with browsers like Firefox adopting it for consistency’s sake. Anyway, there you go: if the backspace button has screwed up your workflow in the past, your life has changed for the better. And if you just wanted the backspace key to behave the way it always has, well, you’re now whole again.

Arguably the more elegant solution here would have just been to include a toggle in Chrome’s Settings page to enable or disable the behavior, but Googlers apparently weren’t fond of that possibility from the beginning.

“There will not be a flag for this,” said Peter Kastings, a senior software engineer on the Chrome UI team in late April. “We prefer that extensions, rather than options, be used to add non-default behavior in most cases.” Bummer.

Via: VentureBeat

Source: Google

17
Aug

Google for Education gets a host of updates as the school year starts


Google’s Chromebook has been particularly successful in the education market — and that’s helped drive its broader software platform, Google for Education. It’s similar to the business offerings Google offers, with access to Gmail, Docs, Sheets, Slides and so on, but it also adds the specialized Google Classroom tool that helps students and teachers stay in sync. With the school year about to kick off again, Google has a handful of updates ready for its education products that are rolling out today.

The first new tool for the Google Classroom app is meant to help parents stay up to date on what their kids are working on. Teachers can set up a daily or weekly summary of what the class is doing and it’ll be sent to parents automatically. It’s meant to keep parents more informed and thus more engaged with what their kids are working on, and this feature sounds like it’ll take a minimal amount of effort to make that happen.

Another addition to Google Classroom puts another nail in the coffin of the venerable whiteboard. The Classroom mobile app now supports the ability to annotate documents, for both students and teachers. Students can now sketch out things like math problems or create visuals to accompany assignments right on their devices, while teachers can go through and mark up homework like they used to do with the dreaded red marker. Teachers can also highlight passages in text assignments they send out or in digital books, as well. It sounds like a way to make digital assignments feel more like classic pen and paper work, and there’s a lot of instances where that makes sense.

Other updates to Classroom include new organization features that let you tag specific posts and then search by those tags; you can also preview documents, PDFs, images and video right in the app. Google Forms, the company’s survey / questionnaire tool, also got a pretty significant update. It now supports images, so you can include a picture along with a question or use multiple pictures as answers to multiple-choice questions. And Google for Education users can finally get their hands on Inbox, the company’s continually-updating vision for how it can handle email in different (and often smarter) ways.

Lastly, Google’s adding a number of new “expeditions” — the company’s idea of virtual reality field trips. And if you’re not a student, fear not: Expeditions are available for anyone. You just need an Android device (iOS support is “coming soon”), and you’ll probably enjoy it a lot more if you pair your phone with Google Cardboard.

17
Aug

LG gives select Korean G5 users access to Android Nougat


LG is giving very few G5 users a taste of Android’s upcoming mobile platform. And when we say “very few,” we mean it: the phonemaker is limiting beta Nougat access to 2,000 G5 owners, which is but a minuscule fraction of the world’s Android users. Also, if you want to be one of the lucky 2,000, you need to be in South Korea.
If you just happen to be in LG’s home country, you need to download the OS Preview application from the local version of Google Play, according to Droid Life. After you’ve installed and downloaded the OS, you can send in your thoughts to the phonemaker. Now, if you’re in the US and other parts of the globe, though — or if you’re using another Android device — you can always sideload the developer preview in case you really can’t wait for the platform’s official release.

Via: Droid Life

Source: LG

17
Aug

Google tells you how to vote by state with a simple search


You’re running out of excuses to not vote in this year’s US presidential election. Google has rolled out a new, state-specific voting guide for anyone who searches “how to vote” or other related queries. Google breaks down the voting process in your state, complete with information on early voting, mail-in ballots, requirements and deadlines. There’s also a drop-down menu that allows you to toggle among states.

Google rolled out a voter registration guide in July that also displayed state-specific information. The company says millions of people have used that tool and searches for voter registration information are up 190 percent nationwide compared with four years ago. Of course, internet penetration in the US has risen over that same time period.

Google is making the data behind its “how to vote” and “voter registration” searches available to the public, “so nonprofits and organizations promoting voter education can benefit and expand the reach of this critical information,” the company says. Apply for access right here.

Source: Google

16
Aug

Google Releases New Video Calling App Called ‘Duo’


Google has announced a new one-to-one video calling app for iOS and Android called Duo, which the company says aims to take the complexity and frustration out of video calling.

Users of Duo sign into the app using just their phone number and Google then sends them a confirmation text. After that, users can video call anyone in their contacts list who also have Duo installed.

Google says Duo is built to be fast and reliable, so that video calls connect quickly and work well even on slower networks.

Call quality adjusts to changing network conditions to keep you connected — when bandwidth is limited, Duo will gracefully reduce the resolution to keep the call going smoothly. For video calls on the go, Duo will switch between Wi-Fi and cellular data automatically without dropping your call. You can start your call at home, and continue seamlessly even when you head out the door.


Apart from its simplicity, Google is heavily hyping a feature (currently limited to Android) called “Knock, Knock”, where a known caller’s live video can be transmitted before the receiver has answered, allowing them to reveal things on the screen to entice the person to accept the connection.

Once they do so, the video continues seamlessly, which makes video calling “more spontaneous and welcoming, helping you connect with the person before you even pick up,” says Google. The company has made no mention about whether the feature will be coming to iOS – and even if it did, users would have to unlock their iPhone first before taking a call.

Google notes that Duo isn’t a replacement for its other video calling app, Hangouts, which it hopes will appeal more to enterprise users as the service is further integrated into the Google Apps suite.

Google Duo is a free download that should be available on the App Store for iPhone sometime today. [Direct Link]

Tag: Google
Discuss this article in our forums

MacRumors-All?d=6W8y8wAjSf4 MacRumors-All?d=qj6IDK7rITs

16
Aug

Google will ‘increasingly focus’ Hangouts on business customers


It’s been more than three years since Google formally launched Hangouts. It was an effort to take the popular Google Talk IM app into the mobile age, but it came late to the party. Lots of competitors like Whatsapp, Facebook Messenger and iMessage were firmly entrenched in mobile chat by the time Hangouts came to life. Despite finally getting a chat and video-calling platform out for every platform, Google announced at its I/O developer conference earlier this year that it was trying again. A new video chat app, Duo, is now available, and a radical new text-based messaging app called Allo is coming soon. Ever since they were announced in May, Google users have wondered: What’s to become of Hangouts?

Google’s VP of communication products, Nick Fox, was willing to talk about that when he gave me an early demo of Duo last week. As Google said earlier this year, Hangouts isn’t going away — but the company will now focus Hangouts on its business users. Going forward, Allo and Duo will be the company’s main consumer chat plays.

“Because Hangouts is built on a Google account, because it’s deeply integrated with Google apps, the Apps suite [things like Drive, Docs, etc.], Gmail, Calendar and so on, it’s seen much more success in the enterprise,” Fox told me. “It will increasingly focus on that kind of group collaboration enterprise productivity space.”

Duo’s focus is extreme simplicity, and anyone who’s used Hangouts for any length of time will admit it’s not the simplest of services. For example, you can do video calls with multiple participants in Hangouts, while Duo allows only one-to-one video calling. That need to make things easier is likely why Google wanted a clean break with the rollout of Allo and Duo — they aren’t tied to your Google account or any of its previous communication services.

Fox also said Google recognized that it didn’t make sense to have one app do everything, something we’ve seen from companies like Facebook, which controversially broke messaging out of its main app. “We’ve historically tried to do a lot in a single app, but the reality is that are pretty different types of communication,” Fox says. “We see them differently, and we think we’ll be able to build the best experiences by building focused experiences that do what they’re intended to do really, really well.”

That doesn’t mean there won’t be consumer confusion going forward, however. Hangouts will continue to exist, and many consumers will certainly still use “Gchat” when looking at their email in a browser. But when they go mobile, Allo and Duo are entirely separate experiences with no desktop equivalent. Google may be focusing Hangouts on the enterprise crowd going forward, but there isn’t a clear path to moving consumers from Hangouts to Allo and Duo.

Of course, for lots of users, that likely won’t matter. Google is right to make mobile its focus because that’s clearly where consumers are. If Duo and Allo are successful, Hangouts will simply fade into memory, used by people who need its more-robust feature set. It’s not what Google had in mind when the product launched three years ago, but sometimes a reboot is necessary.

16
Aug

Duo, Google’s supersimple video chat app, arrives today


Back in May at its I/O developer conference, Google introduced a pair of new communication apps: Allo for text-based communication and Duo for video calling. Allo is the more interesting of the two, with its deep usage of the intelligent Google Assistant bot — but Duo is the one we’ll get to try first. Google hopes it’ll stand out among a bevy of other communications apps thanks to a laser focus on providing a high-quality mobile experience. It’s available today for both the iPhone and Android phones.

“The genesis of Duo was we really saw a gap when it came to video calling,” Nick Fox, Google VP of communications products, said. “We heard lots of [user] frustration, which led to lack of use — but we also heard a lot of desire and interest as well.” That frustration came in the form of wondering who among your contacts you could have video calls with, wondering whether it would work over the wireless connection you had available and wondering if you needed to be calling people with the same type of phone or OS as yours.

To battle that, Google made Duo cross-platform and dead simple to use. You can only call one person at a time, and there’s barely any UI or features to speak of. But from a technology standpoint, it’s meant to work for anyone with a smartphone. “It shouldn’t just work on high-end devices,” said Fox. “It should work on high-end devices and on $50 Android phones in India.”

Google designed it to work across a variety of network connections as well. The app is built to provide HD video when on good networks and to gracefully and seamless adjust quality if things get worse. You can even drop down to a 2G connection and have video pause but have the audio continue. “We’re always prioritizing audio to make sure that you don’t drop communications entirely,” Fox said.

All of this is meant to work in the background, leaving the user with a clutter-free UI and basically no buttons or settings to mess with. Once you sign into the Duo app with your phone number (no Google login needed here), you’ll see what your front-facing camera sees. Below that are a handful of circles representing your most recent calls in the lower third of the screen. You can drag that icon list up and scroll through through your full list of contacts; if people in your phonebook don’t have the app, you can tap their number to send an SMS and invite them to Duo.

For those who do have Duo, tapping their number initiates a video call. Once you’re on the call, you just see the person you’re talking to, with your video feed in a small circle, not unlike Apple’s FaceTime. Tapping the screen reveals the only UI elements: a hang-up button, mute button and a way to flip between the front and back cameras.

Duo is even simpler than FaceTime, and far simpler than Google’s own Hangouts app, which the company says will now be more focused on business and enterprise users. In that focus on simplicity, Fox and his team left out a number of features you might find in other video-calling apps. Chief among them is that Duo can’t do group calls; it’s meant only for one-to-one calling. Google also decided against making desktop apps for Duo or Allo.

“We forced ourselves to think exclusively about the phone and design for the phone,” Fox says. “The desktop experience is something we may build over time. But if you look around the world at the billions of people that are connected to the internet, the vast majority have one device, and that device is a phone. So it was critical for us to really nail that use case.”

That’s part of the reason Google is tying Duo to a phone number rather than your Google account: Your phone already has your contacts built in, while many people might not curate or manage their Google contacts list. This way, you can see exactly who in your usual phone book is using Duo (and if they’re not, you can send them an SMS invite).

Perhaps the most clever feature Google included is Knock Knock. If you’re using an Android phone and someone calls, you’ll see a preview of their video feed on the lock screen. The person calling can wave or gesture or make a silly face to try and draw you into the conversation, and Fox says that makes the person on the receiving end a lot more likely to answer with a smile rather than a look of confusion as they wonder if they video is working properly. For the sake of privacy, you’ll only see a video feed from people in your contacts list, and you can turn the feature off entirely if you prefer.

It’s all part of Google’s goal to make the app not just simple but “human” as well. “It’s something that you don’t generally hear from Google when we talk about our apps,” Fox admits, “but video calling is a very human experience, so it’s very important that you feel that in the app as well.”

All of this adds up to a product that is refreshingly uncluttered and has a clear sense of purpose. It doesn’t fundamentally change the video-calling experience, but it is frictionless and very easy to use on a moment’s notice. Under the hood, the app does live up to its promise of updating the call based on changing network conditions — you can even flip between WiFi and cellular networks without dropping a call. There’s not a whole lot to say about the experience, and that’s probably for the best. You can make calls to people in your contacts list easily, not worry too much about dropping them, and then get on with your life.

That ease of use is what Google hopes will pull users into the app. It does indeed feel simpler than most other options out there. But given the huge variety of communication apps available and Google’s strange historical difficulty with the space, it’s not hard to imagine Duo being a niche app. That won’t be for lack of effort — Duo actually does make video chat easier than making a phone call.

16
Aug

Google to move Hangouts On Air to YouTube Live


Several years ago when Google+ launched, one of its key features was Hangouts, a video chat program that allowed several people to chat online at once. Hangouts grew so popular that it eventually spun off a public-facing option called Hangouts On Air, where would-be stars could interact with their adoring fans. Indeed, actual public figures like Tyra Banks, Brad Pitt and even the President have taken to Hangouts On Air in the past to answer queries. But come September 12th however, that option will be no longer, at least on Google+. Instead, users will be prompted to use YouTube Live, Google’s other live video product, to broadcast in real-time.

According to a Google support document, you can set up the new Hangouts On Air by creating either a “Quick event” or a “Custom event” using YouTube Live’s Creator Studio tool. You can either go live immediately or schedule a YouTube Live broadcast for later. As with the version on Google+, you can have the Hangout be public, unlisted or private to just a select group of invited guests. Unfortunately, Hangout On Air apps like Q&A, Showcase and Applause aren’t currently available on YouTube Live, though they might be in the future.

The move to YouTube is yet another sign that the company is moving away from Google+. Last year, it moved Google Photos to its own product and even completely redesigned Google+ to be more of a community site than a social network. It also retired the G+ account as a requirement to register for services like Google Play Games and YouTube.

Via: VentureBeat

Source: Google

16
Aug

HTC’s Nexus phone efforts show up at the FCC


If there was any doubt that HTC is working on at least one Nexus phone this year, the FCC (and a handful of leaks) just erased it. The regulator has received an HTC filing for smartphones that will be explicitly branded as a Nexus — a letter says you’ll find the user manual on Google’s Nexus page. The entries don’t really show the devices or say exactly what they can do, but the hardware should have full network support for all major North American carriers and beyond. Not that there’s much mystery as to what one of those devices looks like, as you’ll soon see.

Leaks from both Android Police and @Usbfl on Twitter show photos of what’s believed to be the 5-inch Marlin, the smaller of two Nexus devices that HTC is reportedly making this year (the other is the 5.5-inch Sailfish). They line up with a previous render AP made based on a source’s description, and support earlier rumors that both HTC Nexus devices would have a metal-and-glass design, not just the larger one like last year.

Assuming the images are accurate, they also suggest that earlier spec leaks are on the mark. Whether you choose Marlin or Sailfish may depend entirely on your preferred screen size. Both would have a higher-end Snapdragon processor (most likely the 820 or 821), 4GB of RAM, a 12-megapixel rear camera, an 8-megapixel front shooter and at least 32GB of built-in storage. Logically, 2015-era perks like a rear fingerprint reader and USB-C would carry over. There’s still no definitive release window for either Nexus, but they won’t necessarily launch at the same time as the Android Nougat upgrade arrives. Most likely, you’ll have to wait until sometime after LG unveils the first Nougat phone on September 6th.

The 2016 HTC Nexus looks like a cross between the Nexus 4 & iPhone with glass and fingerprint scanner on the back. pic.twitter.com/7pm9fhszki

— nexus (@usbfl) August 14, 2016

Via: The Next Web

Source: FCCID.io, Android Police, Usbfl (Twitter)