Skip to content

Posts from the ‘Reviews’ Category

13
Sep

People Power Presence 360 Release Date, Price and Specs – CNET


presence360.jpg

People Power’s Presence 360 phone stand.

People Power

People Power, the folks behind the Android and iPhone Presence app and the Presence Security Pack, are introducing a new piece of hardware today via Indiegogo: Presence 360.

Available to pre-order worldwide now starting at $99/£75/AU$130, Presence 360 is a plug-in phone stand designed to rotate 360 degrees. Like the Zmodo Pivot camera, Presence 360 is supposed to be able to capture activity happening throughout a space — not just within a fixed field of view.

Cameras, cameras, and more cameras:
  • Salient Eye is the simplest of home security solutions
  • This free app wants to be your DIY security destination
  • Turn your old iPod into a security camera for free

Here’s a quick rundown of Presence 360’s features and capabilities:

  • 360-degree pan-and-tilt functionality
  • Set as many as 3 “vantage points,” like entryway, kitchen and living room
  • Presence 360 can automatically scan those areas for activity
  • Available in Snowflake White and Charcoal Black finishes

Combine that with the Presence app’s motion alerts and video clip storage and this seems like a fairly solid alternative to a traditional camera. I have just one question — if you’re spending $99 on this thing, why not go ahead and invest in a traditional security camera?

Close



How to turn your old iPod into a security camera for free
Drag

The whole appeal behind camera apps like Presence, Manything (featured in the video above) and Salient Eye is that you can turn a spare phone into a makeshift security device for free. $99 is less than most of the security cameras I’ve tested, but People Power plans to bump up the price of Presence 360 to $140 after the Indiegogo campaign ends.

35 connected cameras for a safer smart home…
See full gallery

security-camera-roundup-pic-1.jpg

14 of 36

Next
Prev

Given that the Zmodo Pivot costs just 10 bucks more at $150 (and is currently on sale on Amazon for $100), I’m not convinced that Presence 360 offers a good value. We’ll just have to test it out to be sure. Presence 360’s are expected to ship to backers in December 2016 whether or not its $20,000 funding goal is met on Indiegogo.

13
Sep

iPhone 7 and 7 Plus review: Apple (mostly) plays it safe


Tick-tock. Tick-tock. That clockwork rhythm has more or less defined Apple’s iPhone road map since the days of the 3GS. One year we’d get a new iPhone with a new look and loads of features to agonize over and opine about. Then, the following year, we’d get the same general design with a faster chipset and a few new tricks. The rhythm was almost comforting in its regularity, which made Apple’s unveiling of the new iPhone 7 and 7 Plus such an anomaly. It’s easy to look at these devices as another year’s worth of modest updates crammed into a familiar body, but trust me: It’s a little more complicated than that. What Apple ultimately did was create two world-class smartphones that skew more toward “safe” than “state of the art”. The big question here is whether a bunch of relatively unexciting changes add up to greatness.

Hardware

Apple iPhone 7 and 7 Plus review

You don’t need me to tell you that this year’s iPhones look an awful lot like last year’s. Like it or not, Apple believed there was still room to improve the phone design we’ve been using for two years, so it focused on that instead of cooking up a brand-new aesthetic. It’s tempting to say Apple’s current design philosophy boils down to “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” but that’s not really true either: The company actually fixed a lot this year.

Some changes are subtler than others. The 7 and 7 Plus’s antenna bands swoop around the phones’ curves instead of cutting across their backs. The iPhone’s 12-megapixel camera (or cameras, in the case of the 7 Plus) is surrounded by an aluminum hump, rather than just jutting out like in the old days. Apple finally made 32GB the new storage baseline and gave the 7 and 7 Plus a seriously spacious 256GB option. Both models are the exact same size as the models that preceded them, but the 7 and 7 Plus have each shed a couple of grams here and there. The loss of a few paper clips’ worth of weight isn’t nothing, though, especially when we’re talking about devices that we hardly ever put down.

From there, the list of changes starts to look more substantial. If you’re lucky, you’ll never need to know that the 7 and 7 Plus meet IP67 water-resistance standards. In other words, they’re built to withstand dust ingress and, more important, submersion in up to a meter of water for 30 minutes. Apple’s rivals have made big strides in making their smartphones more life-proof, so all I can really say is: It’s. About. Time. Finally, we get iPhones that’ll survive when you drop them in puddles, get caught in the rain or intentionally dunk them in beer. (Note: liquid damage still isn’t covered by Apple’s warranty.) Catching up to the competition has never been so welcome, or so tasty.

Meanwhile, the all-too-familiar home button isn’t a physical button anymore. It’s a solid-state affair that makes the phone taptically throb when you push it. This wound up being way more divisive a tweak than I expected; when I showed it off to colleagues, just about all of them recoiled at first press. As a longtime iPhone user, I can’t quite explain how off the sensation felt at first, but it only took about a day for me to get over it. Now it’s a little weird to press an older iPhone’s home button and not get the little bzzt of feedback from the Taptic Engine; but I digress.

The phones come in new colors too: a matte black and “jet black.” The former looks exactly what you’d expect a black iPhone to look like, though the dark finish does a good job obscuring those antenna bands. Jet black, meanwhile, is at once lovely and a bit of a bummer. When I say lovely, I really mean it: The moment I touched one, I couldn’t believe it was made of the same 7000 series aluminum as the others. In fact, it doesn’t feel like metal at all, thanks to Apple’s lengthy anodization and polishing process. Jet black iPhone bodies feel just as glossy and slick to the touch as their glass screens, and that unity makes them feel like seamless, cohesive wholes. The entire thing is seriously impressive, even if it feels sort of plasticky.

Then the scratches and smudges appear. I’m not a case person, but I take good care of my things and exercised what felt like a more than reasonable level of caution carrying these new phones around. It didn’t even take 24 hours for the first batch of scratches to appear on my jet black iPhone 7’s back, which was either the result of placing it on a bar’s granite countertop or repeatedly shoving it into my empty jeans pocket. Those little nicks have only multiplied, which could be an understandable deal-breaker for some of you.

And now we’ve come to the elephant in the room. Neither the iPhone 7 nor the iPhone 7 Plus has a traditional 3.5mm headphone jack. To hear Apple tell the tale, getting rid of that decades-old standard wasn’t just a practical move to make waterproofing and increased battery life possible — it was also an act of “courage.” Here’s a bit of unsolicited advice for Apple: I get that changing the world is sort of your thing, but maybe go easy on the hubris next time. Anyway. I’ll dig into audio quality in just a moment, but suffice to say that the toughest part of not having a headphone jack is trying to break all my old listening habits. I can’t tell you the number of times I tried to plug a regular pair of earbuds into these phones before — d’oh! — remembering that doesn’t work and then having to root around for the included Lightning-to-3.5mm adapter.

This also means you can forget about charging your phone while listening to music at the same time — unless you have wireless headphones or are willing to buy a third-party adapter to split that Lightning port. (When asked if the company planned to release its own splitter, an Apple spokesperson said they had “nothing to announce.”) The iPhone 7 and 7 Plus have better batteries than the models that came before them, so charging and listening honestly hasn’t been a big issue, but still, no one would fault you for crying foul. Either way, Apple isn’t the only company to have signed the headphone jack’s death warrant. Motorola released two flagship phones this year that used their USB Type-C ports for audio, though it did so at least partially because it expected Apple to ditch that jack, too.

Display and sound

Once again, the smaller iPhone 7 has a 4.7-inch Retina HD screen, while the Plus has a 5.5-inch display. The resolution and pixel density are the same too, so you’re not going to be seeing anything more crisply now than you did in 2015. Rather than chase other companies squeezing higher-res displays into their phones, Apple chose to focus on a more fundamental part of these screens: how they render color. The 7 and 7 Plus support the DCI-P3 wide color gamut, which — long story short — means they’re capable of reproducing more colors than the standard sRGB color range. Put another way, they’re able to display more vivid, nuanced images than the iPhones that came before them, thanks to a color space that’s standard in the film industry.

So what does that mean for your day-to-day life? Well, it kind of depends on how good your eyes are. The difference between these displays and the ones we got last year aren’t always obvious. Colors are often a touch brighter, and you can see subtle shades that help images feel more lifelike: Skies are bluer, sunsets are warmer and people’s skin looks more lively. Then again, changes that seemed subtle to me were more pronounced to others, so maybe my eyes are a little dim.

The screens in the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are also notably brighter than on last year’s models, and they’ve gained a new trick for when you’re outdoors. Apple says it uses the 7 and 7 Plus’s ambient light sensor to tell if you’re inside; if not, the screen can get even brighter to compensate for sunlight. That’s right: Not all maximum brightness levels are created equal. That being the case, I’m a little surprised Apple didn’t bring the 9.7-inch iPad Pro’s TrueTone color-temperature-tweaking system to the 7 and 7 Plus. My guess is they couldn’t squeeze it into these phones’ smaller bodies.

Here’s another first: The 7 and 7 Plus are the first iPhones to feature stereo audio (another trick Android phone makers have dabbled with for ages). Why it took so long for Apple to try this eludes me; they’re a huge addition to the iPhone formula. Movies, podcasts and speakerphone calls sound dramatically better now, though the stereo separation doesn’t seem quite as pronounced as on devices like the old HTC Ones. That’s thanks to Apple’s speaker setup — rather than stick two speakers right on these iPhones’ faces, sound springs forth from the main earpiece and the speaker on the bottom-right edge. I’ll take it.

If you’re still bristling about the whole needing-an-adapter-for-your-headphones thing, well, at least the sound quality doesn’t suffer in the process. I used my go-to headphones (a pair of Samsung Level On PROs) to listen to the same music on the 6s and on an iPhone 7 with the Lightning adapter, and couldn’t tell any difference at all. Ditto for a blind listen-off between the 6s and the 7 Plus: They sounded identical to me.

Camera

This is where things get really interesting. By now you know the iPhone 7 has a single 12-megapixel camera on its back, and guess what — it’s a damned good one. That’s saying something, considering there’s been no resolution boost since last year, and the pixels on that new sensor haven’t gotten bigger either. And yet the photos they capture come out significantly better; there wasn’t a big difference in how much detail was captured, but colors looked more vibrant and true to life than on the iPhone 6s Plus.

Surprised? You shouldn’t be. The iPhone 7’s camera captures more color data than previous ones (the better to view on that wide-color-gamut display), and the results are pretty great. In fact, I generally preferred shots taken with the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus to ones captured with a Galaxy S7 Edge. The latter captured a wider field of view and was sometimes better accurately rendering green landscapes, but the iPhone’s leg up on colors meant their photos tended to look nicer (to me, anyway). Test shots taken with the iPhone 7 were also generally better exposed than similar shots taken with the 6s, which in my case usually meant fewer blown-out skies washing out my photos. But every smartphone camera does well when it’s bright outside. What about when things get dim?

It’s a toss-up. The inclusion of optical image stabilization across both versions of the iPhone 7 helps, as does the main camera’s f/1.8 aperture. Props to Samsung: Photos taken with the S7 Edge did indeed look brighter, but the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus offered more natural colors. Before today I would’ve said the S7s and the Note 7s had the best all-around smartphone cameras, but now Apple is right there, neck and neck with the best of them. The iPhone 7’s front-facing camera has also received a major upgrade. It’s been bumped up to seven megapixels and inherited some of the architecture that made the rear cameras so formidable. Long story short, your selfies are going to look lovely. Oh, and videos look really nice too, since they exhibit the same accurate colors as stills. Go forth and vlog, you pioneer.

Then, of course, there’s the iPhone 7 Plus’s dual camera setup, which pairs a 12-megapixel wide-angle shooter with a 12-megapixel telephoto camera to give the Plus an actual zoom. Apple isn’t the first to dabble in dual cameras, nor is it the first company to attempt this zooming configuration; LG tried it earlier this year with half-decent results. Apple’s approach feels more elegant, though — with a quick tap you can switch between 1x and 2x zoom modes, or you can drag a slider or pinch with two fingers for more precise control. By the way, you’ll probably want to stay at 1x or 2x zoom (or somewhere in between). Apple added digital zoom up to 10x, and the closer you get to that ceiling, the noisier and more indistinct things get. That’s not surprising, though.

This whole thing might sound like a gimmick, and it sort of feels like one for a few minutes. After that, the “what do I do with this?” factor falls away and the optical zoom just becomes a handy trick to have at your disposal. The photos turned out great too, though you might notice some differences in the colors and exposure if you take comparison shots with both of the iPhone 7 Plus’s cameras. The secondary telephoto camera still shoots 12-megapixel photos, but it has a slightly wider f/2.8 aperture. Basically, it doesn’t let as much light in, so the photos come out a little different. Avid photographers might take issue with these minute changes; everyone else need not worry. For now, this is the only trick the 7 Plus has that the smaller 7 doesn’t, but that’ll change soon. Apple’s going to update it with a feature that lets you play with depth of field when you’re shooting portraits, so you can get a little more bokeh going on.

Software

The iPhone 7 and 7 Plus might not seem like the most exciting hardware updates, but there’s plenty to get excited about in iOS 10. Granted, very little of it will come as a surprise, since it’s been available as a public beta for months now. Our full review is coming soon, and I’ve already detailed some of the new features, so I’ll just recap the highlights here.

It took a while for me to get used to the revamped Photos app, but I sort of love it now. The app’s original form was really basic: You could sift through your photos by “Moment” and poke around in albums, shared or otherwise. The iOS 10 version, meanwhile, uses machine learning to sort photos into themed “memories” based on where you’ve been and when you’ve done things. The best part: searching through all your photos by keyword, since iOS 10 uses AI to identify what’s in your picture. As it turns out, I have 14 pictures with bibs in them despite not being a parent.

Apple’s bright, bold new Music app was easier to jump right into, and I’m a fan now. The first time you launch the app, you’re dropped right inside your music library (which is how it should be). All of the touch targets are bigger and easier to hit, even when I was glancing down at them mid-run. It’s also satisfying to see 3D Touch finally get more use. I wrote in my iPhone 6s review that using that pressure-sensitive screen was something I eventually wanted to do all the time; too bad iOS 9’s never tapped into its full potential. Not anymore. It feels like 3D Touch is connected more strongly to iOS 10’s core; I’ve been using it to expand notifications, bring up contextual menus in Apple Music and glance at widgets for first-party apps like the dialer and Weather.

Apple is also making better use of the Taptic Engine this time around, so you’ll feel it all over the place — literally. The prominent examples are the ones you’d expect, like 3D-Touching notifications and using the home button, but you’ll also feel a brief thud when you flick the Control Center open. Skimming your Apple Music collection for a specific song? Sliding your finger down the alphabet on the side of the screen feels like running your finger down a washboard, allowing you to more easily stop on a letter.

Oh, by the way, the process of forcing your 7 or 7 Plus to restart is totally different. Instead of holding down the power and home buttons like we have been for a decade, the new process requires you to hold down the power and volume down keys.

And now for some bad news: I still haven’t been able to test some of iOS 10’s headline features. Siri’s intelligence is poised to get a big upgrade thanks to third-party apps, but I couldn’t yet ask her to call me an Uber or send my friend $20 via Venmo. And while I’m also a little obsessed with sending these weird new iMessages, it’s too bad that at time of writing, the iMessage app store was still virtually barren. I’ll update this review as the store comes online and I get to play with more weird stuff.

Performance and battery life

Another year, another high-powered A-series chip to play with. The iPhone 7 and 7 Plus both run the company’s new A10 Fusion, a quad-core chipset that pairs two speedy CPU cores with two longer-lasting ones that use 20 percent of the power the others do. It’s easily the fastest chip Apple has ever stuck in a mobile device, beating out even the 9.7-inch iPad Pro’s A9X processor. More important, there’s basically zero difference in performance between the 7 and 7 Plus, even though the smaller version has 2GB of RAM, versus 3GB on the Plus.

I restored the new iPhones from backups of our 6s and the differences were immediately clear. There’s almost no delay from when you tap an app icon to when it launches, and popping in and out of apps was noticeably faster too. Both the 7 and 7 Plus were also able to handle graphically demanding games like Warhammer 40,000: Freeblade, Submerged and Mortal Kombat X without breaking a sweat.

In fairness, the 6s and 6s Plus played these nearly as well, but the 7 and 7 Plus’s batteries don’t get depleted as much in the process. Part of that is likely due to the 6s’s battery deteriorating over time, but the A10 Fusion’s GPU is also more power-efficient. Ultimately, what might be most telling is that when it came to day-to-day use, I stopped thinking about performance completely.

3DMark Unlimited IS 37,663 37,784 24,601 27,542
Geekbench 3 (multi-core) 5,544 5,660 4,427 4,289
Basemark OS II 3,639 3,751 2,354 2,428

We can’t talk performance without delving into the 7 and 7 Plus’s batteries, and thankfully they’re an improvement over last year. One of the few upsides to removing that headphone jack was that it freed up more space to make these batteries a little bigger — 14 percent larger in the iPhone 7 and 5 percent in the 7 Plus. In our standard video rundown test (in which the phones are connected to WiFi with a video looping at 50 percent brightness), the 7 lasted for 12 hours and 18 minutes, or just about two hours longer than the 6s. The 7 Plus, meanwhile, looped Whiplash for 14 hours and 10 minutes, or about an hour and a half longer than the 6s Plus. That’s also on par with Samsung’s Galaxy Note 7. Not bad at all.

Eventually, though, I had to give up on bingeing on a raw jazz thriller and get some actual work done. These days, my usual routine involves lots of Slack messages, emails, Spotify playlists and marathon Hearthstone sessions. When put through that very specific kind of wringer, the iPhone 7 usually stuck around for a full workday and often survived until mid-morning the following day. The 7 Plus, meanwhile, frequently lasted through nearly two days of mixed use and downtime, a notable improvement over the 6s Plus. Obviously, your mileage will vary, but here’s hoping that these upgraded batteries stay this good over time. (We’ll see about that.)

The competition

Under normal circumstances, the Galaxy Note 7 would be at the top of this list, but, well … you know. While Samsung continues its global recall over exploding batteries, you should consider the Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge in the Note’s place. They share the same Snapdragon 820 chip and 4GB of RAM, not to mention the same lovely 12-megapixel cameras that rival the sensor Apple used this year. If you’re a screen snob, Samsung’s displays might be more appealing, since they run at a higher resolution and also support a wider color gamut than the sRGB standard. Apple and Android fans often tussle over which platform is superior, but make no mistake: The newest iPhones and the newest Galaxies are all truly excellent smartphones.

Looking for impeccable build quality and equally good sound? Consider HTC’s underrated 10. It’s easily the most impressive phone the company has crafted in years, and with support for hi-res audio and a headphone jack, it’s arguably a more versatile media machine. Speaking of HTC, it’s rumored to be working on the two most anticipated Android devices of the moment. We’re not entirely sure if they’ll be called Nexus phones or Pixel phones or something else entirely — either way, Google is said to be prepping for an October 4 unveiling. Codenamed “Sailfish” and “Marlin,” both are expected to pack quad-core Qualcomm chipsets (either the Snapdragon 820 or 821) with 4GB of RAM and 12-megapixel main cameras.

The biggest difference is reportedly the size of their screens, with the smaller Sailfish sporting a 5-inch or 5.2-inch 1080p display, while the Marlin runs with a 5.5-inch Quad HD screen. If you don’t care about smartphones as much as you care about getting the best phone, period, you might want to wait and see what Google has up its sleeve.

Wrap-up

The iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are at once the most technically impressive smartphones Apple has ever made and the most divisive. After all, they’re excellent because of Apple’s renewed attention to the basics: the speed, the camera, the screen, the battery. None of these improvements on their own are terribly exciting, but together they make for a pair of phones that are more than the sum of their parts. Then again, where’s the envelope-pushing? Where’s the Apple that upended an industry? It’s surely still there, locked behind closed doors that won’t be opened again for another year. In the meantime, we’re left to consider this year’s work.

If you can get over the all-too-familiar design and the no-headphone-jack thing, then the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are serious contenders for best smartphones, period. Note that I used the word “best,” not “most innovative” — neither of these devices is groundbreaking. We’ve seen many of these features (or features like them) pop up in rival phones already. That headphone jack thing aside, most of the choices made in the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus feel like safe ones. There’s nothing wrong with that, but no matter how good the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are (answer: very, very good), Apple already has us all wondering what next year’s iPhone is going to be like.

13
Sep

Apple’s AirPods aren’t a must-buy — yet


The iPhone 7 goes on sale in a few days, and with it comes another nail in the headphone jack’s proverbial coffin. Included in the box you’ll find a pair of Lightning-tipped EarPods and a Lightning-to-3.5mm adapter for your analog headphones, but to hear Apple tell it, the future of music is wireless. That’s where the $159 AirPods come in: the company’s totally cordless earbuds are slated for an October launch, and they promise elegance, ease of use and great sound. They deliver … some of that, but after about a week of testing, they often felt as confusing as they did cool.

Getting started

Apple Airpods review

When you open the packaging for the first time, you’re met with a rounded white mass that looks similar to a container of dental floss. That’s the charging case, and it’s where the AirPods are going to spend most of their time. It’s almost completely nondescript, save for a chrome-accented hinge, a Lightning port on the bottom and a small button on the back — you’ll need that to pair the AirPods for the first time. Side note: You don’t need to be an iOS devotee to use these things. They paired just fine with a Galaxy S7 Edge, but all of the fun stuff basically evaporated; all you can do is listen to music and take calls.

Speaking of pairing, it’s a cinch if you’re using the AirPods with iPhones running iOS 10, though you’ll get an error if you try connecting them to a phone still on iOS 9. (The AirPods are also compatible with Apple Watches running watchOS 3 and Macs on macOS Sierra, but I didn’t have anything like that lying around.) Just open the charging case near the phone, et voilà: A window will pop up on the screen prompting you to connect the AirPods. Hold down the button and that’s it — you’re ready to let the tunes flow. Granted, it was never all that hard to get things connected via Bluetooth, but this simplicity is one of the best parts of using AirPods. They just work.

Design

Naturally, ease of use doesn’t mean a thing if you’re not comfortable having these in your ears. In brief, if you hated the way Apple’s wired EarPods looked or felt in your ears, these aren’t going to do anything for you. I never minded them myself — they were fine for when I went on runs, and I never had problems with them falling out of my ears. That streak continued nicely with the AirPods, but I know a ton of people for whom EarPods just never fit. Still others could get EarPods in their ears but couldn’t use them for long because they’d just fall out. Sound familiar? You probably shouldn’t take a chance on these.

They also just look sort of awkward, as though you popped in some EarPods and immediately snipped the cords off. My colleague Andy might have said it best: When I strolled into our San Francisco office wearing them, he said I looked like I had broken Q-Tips off in my ears. He had a point. In fairness, I’m stunned Apple squeezed as much tech into the AirPods as they did; there’s a pair of batteries to keep everything working, plus accelerometers and an optical sensor to determine whether the AirPods are in your ears.

Powering all that is a tiny chip called the W1 that manages the connection between the AirPods and the device they’re connected to. Apple has said this silicon will wind up in Beats wireless headphones soon too, though I’ll bite my tongue and not make jokes about Beats’ audio quality until I actually get a chance to try them. Oh, here’s a quick (and probably obvious) pro tip. The AirPods are prone to the same absentminded goofs that could spell doom for other completely wireless earbuds. In fact, just before I sat down to write this sentence, I rushed to my laundry room to fish the AirPods out of a pair of jeans I had just thrown in the hamper. Don’t be like me, people. Always put them back in the case.

In use

After popping in the ‘Pods and hearing the instrumental confirmation sound, things are ready to happen. Now we’re getting to the meaty part: How do these things actually sound? Not bad, but ultimately not much better than the EarPods we know and love. That’s not to say there aren’t any improvements. In general, the AirPods gave mids a little more meat than EarPods did, and drum fills felt crisper and more precise. My test tracks — which these days include a lot of jazz and EDM — came across warmer than I would have expected, which was a pleasant surprise.

That said, the all-too-familiar design means the AirPods inherit my biggest pet peeve with the EarPods — how airy they make my music sound. Songs that go heavy on the highs and lows tend to sound a little toothless, which, again, is natural for this design. I’m just frustrated that Apple couldn’t have tweaked it to achieve a little more oomph.

I also wish we had the option to customize the AirPods’ controls more. By default, double-tapping one of the buds wakes Siri up, and she can do all the things you’d expect. You can change these controls so that a double tap pauses and plays the current track, but that’s really about it. (You can also just remove an earbud to pause your music, which seems like the more natural way to go anyway.) The thing is, if you want to change tracks or tweak the volume, you have to either ask Siri to do it or reach for your phone. That’s it. Years of using Apple’s white earbuds have ingrained in me the double click to skip a song and a triple click to go back. It seems odd that there’s no way to program these common controls.

Lest you think I’m being needlessly picky, know that the AirPods actually work really well for voice calls. The stems that point down from the buds house the antenna and microphone, and no one I spoke to over the course of the week had any complaints about audio quality. The battery life has generally been impressive too, with the AirPods typically lasting a little over the five hours Apple said to expect. Frequent trips to the charging case help in a pinch too, since it can extend the Pods’ runtime by up to three hours with a 15-minute charge. I’ve plugged in the whole pod-and-case package just once since I received these things a week ago and the case is still sitting pretty with 33 percent battery life. Not bad at all.

Wrap-up

When I first encountered the AirPods, I said I didn’t think they’d be a must-have. One week later, that’s still where my head is: The Pods are smart, and their integration with iOS 10 is first-rate, but they fall short in some important ways — sound quality could have been better, and I wish the controls had some more nuance. That said, I’m intrigued by the possibilities they present. If Apple had made the software and controls a little more flexible, this review might have taken a very different turn. If you’re reading this, Apple, this was a solid first attempt. Don’t give up on the concept, because I believe future AirPods could be great.

12
Sep

The RetroUSB AVS just replaced my childhood Nintendo


When I was a child, I fought with my brothers. A lot. It was part of being the youngest, and part of being a family. Most of our sibling rivalry died with our youth, but one single, never-ending quarrel outlived our childhood: the Nintendo Entertainment System. My oldest brother and I have been bickering over our original NES for decades. Who really owns it? Me, the guy who scoured garage sales to build our collection of classic games, or him, the firstborn who — by sibling law — is right by default? To this day, we still argue about whose house our childhood console should live in. Today, that war finally ends. I don’t need our old Nintendo anymore. I have the RetroUSB AVS.

Think of the AVS as an unofficial hardware refresh for the original Nintendo Entertainment System. It plays the same games and even uses the original controllers, but everything else is brand-new. Instead of pushing a fuzzy, ugly picture through ancient composite cables, it pipes a crisp, high-definition signal over HDMI. In lieu of a cumbersome AC adapter, the AVS uses a humble USB cable — and can be powered solely by the media port on your HDTV. And, unlike the RetroN 5 or Analogue NT, the AVS is all new hardware: a custom FPGA board programmed to replicate the NES’ original processor. No emulators. No repurposed hardware.

OK, that might sound like splitting hairs. After all, don’t all three of these consoles pipe HD NES games to modern televisions via HDMI? Well, yes — but how they do it varies wildly. The RetroN 5, for instance, is actually a $160 Android device that runs cartridges through an emulator. It’s also widely derided in the gaming community for allegedly stealing code. The Analogue NT is completely legit, and actually uses repurposed Famicom chips to run the games on a mix of old and new hardware — but it’s also a premium device, costing a steep $500. The AVS is something of a happy medium: It’s not made from original parts, but it authentically replicates their functionality without legal ambiguity. At $185, the RetroUSB AVS is comparatively affordable too.

Nostalgia by design

The RetroUSB AVS’ trapezoidal chassis is nothing short of a love letter to the NES’ iconic design. Obviously, the monochromatic color scheme is a nod to the black and gray tones of the original’s case, but it’s the little things that make this homage truly delightful. This includes the shape of the lid that covers the console’s cartridge slot, and “power” and “reset” buttons that look and feel identical to their 1980s inspiration — but the most wonderful (and pointless) details can be seen only when you turn the console over.

Here you can see three trenches leading up to an empty recessed square that represents the original NES’ unused expansion slot, vent placement that mirrors the layout of the original console, and foot pads that look identical to the rubber nubs on my childhood console. All of these design nods are completely unnecessary, and on a part of the device most users will never even bother to look at. Clearly, the designers love the original Nintendo. It shows.

As much as I love how weirdly accurate the AVS’ retro design is, it might be nostalgic to a fault. That cover over the console’s cartridge slot does look exactly like the old NES chamber lid, but it’s a lot longer too. It feels like a compromise, designed to ensure that users can more easily insert and remove games — but opening and closing it feels awkward. I’m constantly worried it’ll bend too far and snap off. With front-loading US region games, it at least feels secure when the lid is closed, but Japanese region Famicom titles use a separate top-loading cartridge slot that forces the door to stay open. It looks weird, and it makes me nervous.

Speaking of games, loading them can be a bit tricky. US titles slide in horizontally, just like on the original, but I never managed to seat a cartridge into the connector on the first try. Wiggling them back and forth a little usually did the job. The connector also holds on to games tightly — removing them was just as much an exercise in wiggling as putting them in. It’s not a deal-breaker, but I do wish changing games were a little easier.

Finally, it’s worth noting that the AVS features four controller ports and a Famicom expansion slot — which enables compatibility for the rare four-player NES game (they do exist!) and for extra controllers compatible with the original Japanese Famicom.

Practically pixel perfect

Playing NES games on the RetroUSB’s console is like putting on prescription glasses for the first time: It brings a blurry, indistinguishable mess of light and color into focus. OK, the original NES isn’t that bad, but the difference between composite cables and 720p over HDMI is startling. Did you know that Mega Man’s sprite actually has white behind its eyes? I didn’t. It always blended in with the character’s pale skin tone. Backgrounds that were once a blurry haze of color now appear as distinct patterns; characters and stages are flush with “new” details and brighter colors. It’s a surreal experience: I’ve been playing these games for 30 years, but now it seems like I’ve never really “seen” them before.

I know what you’re thinking: Can’t I already play NES games in HD through the Nintendo Wii U’s Virtual Console? You can, but they’ll look worse. For some reason, the Wii U’s VC implementation presents classic games in dull, muted colors with a side of blur. I tested Punch-Out!!!, Dr. Mario and a couple of Mega Man games side by side, and the Wii U versions looked worse by every measure. The games are no less fun on the official hardware, but they lack pop and polish compared with how my old cartridges look on the RetroUSB AVS. Here, the AVS does better than even Hyperkin’s RetroN 5 — which looks much sharper than the Virtual Console but tends to have overblown, inaccurate colors.

Best of all, every classic game I own ran perfectly on the AVS — and that’s not something I can say about every NES clone console I’ve come across. Most of these products use NES-on-a-chip solutions that either gets audio wrong or simply won’t play certain games. Paperboy, for instance, isn’t playable on either the Retro Duo or the FC Twin, and both consoles play off-key audio in specific games. Not so with the RetroUSB AVS: Everything I played looked and sounded exactly as it was supposed to. It even got the glitches right, faithfully reproducing minor visual hiccups in Mega Man 3 and Super Mario Bros. 3 that were present on the original hardware.

Of all the devices that play NES games in my house, the RetroUSB AVS is the most accurate, hands down — but that doesn’t mean it’s perfect. When compared directly with my childhood NES, it’s clear that the AVS color palette is just a bit brighter. It’s not overblown or washed out like the colors on the RetroN 5, but it does come across as a bit richer than the original hardware. I noticed it most in Castlevania and Mega Man 3. On the AVS, the bricks of Dracula’s castle have more red in them, and Mega Man’s helmet appears to be a darker shade of blue.

When I asked RetroUSB’s Brian Parker about the difference, he chalked it up to differences in televisions. “NTSC,” he joked. “Never The Same Color.” I’m probably just seeing the difference between a clear digital signal and the fuzzy output of the old console’s composite cables. Even if the colors are wrong, Parker says it’s just part of the console’s NES/RGB lookup table. “Easily changed with a firmware update,” he says. The AVS also outputs only in 720p, but considering it still looks better than the RetroN 5 and Wii U at 1080p, it’s a flaw I’m happy to overlook.

Extra features

If you’re looking for a console to imbue your classic games with fancy graphics filters, instant-save-state features and other bells and whistles, look elsewhere: The AVS keeps things pretty simple. Beyond simply playing classic games in crisp, high definition, this console doesn’t do much. In terms of visual options, the AVS allows users to switch between NTSC and PAL modes, adjust the screen margins (to hide overscan garbage in specific games) and adjust scanline darkness. The console’s controller menu allows you to turn on some basic turbo features and see how many gamepads are connected, but that’s about it.

At the end of the day, there are only two special features that the AVS adds to the vanilla NES experience: built-in cheat codes and an integrated scoreboard. The first is self-explanatory: The AVS automatically recognizes the game in its slot and offers players a short list of the most popular Game Genie codes. The second takes a little more legwork; if the AVS is being powered by a PC or Mac’s USB port, users can download companion software that will keep track of their in-game score while they play and allow them to upload it to an online leaderboard.

Unfortunately, the AVS itself doesn’t make this process clear, presenting users with only a menu that fails to connect to an amorphous server. There are no setup instructions for the scoreboard in the console’s menu or the manuals that came in the box, or even on the product’s website — I had to ask Parker via email. Still, it’s a neat feature if you can get it up and running.

Finally, RetroUSB offers one special feature that no competitor can boast: new NES games. The company has kind of made a name for itself in manufacturing new cartridges for homebrew developers, and it’s neat to see that business cross over here to create a series of “launch titles” that work on both the AVS and the Nintendo’s original hardware. I tried Twelve Seconds, a simple jumping game that challenges you to race to the top of the screen as fast as possible. None of the $45 launch titles seem particularly complex, but there’s definitely a thrill to playing a new NES game after all these years.

Wrap-up

For me, the AVS is the ideal replacement for my original hardware — it plays my cartridge collection perfectly, with better visuals than the original — but it’s not for everybody. Gamers who need modern conveniences like save states and graphic filters will probably rather have a RetroN 5. Folks seeking a nostalgic experience, but who don’t already own a library of classic games will probably be happier with the 30 built-in games that come with Nintendo’s NES Classic. Even hardcore collectors who demand that their games run on original hardware have other options in the expensive Analogue NT Mini or a Hi-Def-NES mod.

If you have a classic game collection, however, and you don’t care for the prestige of original hardware or the allure of added bells and whistles, check out the RetroUSB AVS. It’s probably the best modernized NES experience you can get for under $200.

12
Sep

Blu Vivo 5R unboxing and first impressions


The Blu Vivo 5R is the sixth in the Vivo series of smartphones, which is essentially a mid-range line of devices. To be fair, though, the mid-range pretty much only applies to the hardware that powers the experience; the exterior is quite polished and punches above its weight.

We’ve had a Vivo 5R in our possession for a few days now and have come to really like the look and feel of the phone. Designed with aluminum and curved glass, the handset looks like it would cost at least $50-$75 more than it does. Indeed, this $200 experience has all the trappings of a flagship model yet it’s not too much phone for the average user.

blu-vivo-5r

Aside from the outward appearance, a few things we’ve already come to appreciate in the Vivo 5R include the fingerprint reader and Android build. The former is new to the Vivo line while the OS is an updated, more secure, and feature-rich platform.

Let’s face it, it’s not as if the Vivo 5 needed to be refreshed already. Given it’s only eight months old, we would not have been surprised if another 2-4 months went by without a successor. Thankfully, Blu decided the time was right to drop a refresh.

Not only do we get more memory and storage in the Vivo 5R, but users also pick up an extra half-inch of display. There’s a slight trade-off in terms of size, of course; it’s taller than its predecessor and a teeny bit bigger on the other edges. It’s barely taller than the OnePlus 3, but it’s every bit as pocketable and one-hand friendly.

img_20160909_105023

One thing we were glad to see in the Vivo 5R was its $200 price tag. This is the same space that the Vivo 5 occupied so it’s essentially like getting a punch up barely one half year after release. We’re not sure what will happen to the cost of the older sibling, but we’re guessing a price drop is soon in order.

We love the rear placement of the fingerprint sensor as it’s right where your finger tends to rest. It’s the same spot as where you’ll find it on a Nexus 6P or where the volume buttons are for the recent LG G models. Thus far it has been snappy all around. Speaking of snappy, we appreciate that it can also be used to activate the shutter of the camera.

The 3150mAh battery carries over from the Vivo 5, which is a big win in our eyes. More than enough to get users through a day or more of typical tasks, it’s bigger than what most lower-cost phones offer. We might have liked the USB Type-C connector, but not everyone is making the jump yet. But, given Blu has included it in a number of recent models, we were surprised to see the microUSB port.

img_20160909_105046

The nearly stock Android build is present, something we’ve come to appreciate in Blu models. There’s a few apps pre-loaded from the handset maker, but it’s not heavy handed. Aside from McAfee Security and Opera, the only other non-Blu touches are apps from Amazon. If you’re new to Android, you’ll get the near-Nexus software, and is almost exactly what Google intends for users. It’s intuitive, friendly, secure, and smart.

When it comes to cameras, we’re yet-again astonished by what we’re getting out of Blu, especially for the price. To us, it’s getting harder and harder to justify spending more than $400 on a phone. When you look at some of the pictures you can take in a $300 phone like the Pure XR, it’s tough to consider pulling more out of the wallet. The same goes for the Vivo 5R; it’s amazing what you get out of the Sony sensor.

img_20160909_105113Keeping in mind that we’ve only had the Vivo 5R for just over three days, we’re totally digging it. Having just used the Pure XR for a daily driver over the last few weeks, we expected to feel the difference, literally. We figured it would come across as cheaper in texture or build. We were happy to be proven wrong.

In terms of performance, we’ve not put this one through a battery of daily driver tests. We’re just starting out with the stock experience to see how it goes out of box. Another couple of days and we’ll put on the various accounts and apps to get rolling.  Suffice it to say, even though it has less internal hardware power than the recently released Pure XR, it’s negligible for the most part. Again, a few days from now we might sing a different tune, but the octa-core processor with 3GB RAM is plenty for many users.

img_20160909_105016

Kudos to Blu for throwing in the screen protector and rubber protective case on top of the headphones and power cable. It’s a small gesture that saves a little bit of money, but it’s certainly appreciated.

We’ll be putting together the formal review over the next few days so be sure to check back for more coverage.

12
Sep

TiVo Bolt+ Release Date, Price and Specs – CNET


boltplusrfw-remote.jpg TiVo

TiVo’s Bolt+ might be the shock your home entertainment system has needed.

Just about a year ago, TiVo introduced the Bolt, a single smaller, speedier box for watching and recording cable or over-the-air (OTA) broadcasts, as well as streaming over-the-top (OTT) services such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Hulu, YouTube and more.

But for those in need of an expansive multiroom solution, the Bolt came up short in tuners — it has just four — and storage maxed out at 1TB, enough for about 150 hours of HD content. The Bolt+, on the other hand, has six tuners, so adding a TiVo Mini extender or two (each of which uses one of the Bolt’s tuners for streaming live TV) still leaves you extra tuners for recordings. And with 3TB of storage you can record up to 450 hours of HD programming.

Unfortunately, this comes at the cost of being able to watch and record OTA broadcasts. Otherwise, the Bolt+ gets all of the Bolt’s performance and feature enhancements, including SkipMode for blowing past commercial breaks with a single button press, in- and out-of-home streaming of your recordings, and 4K support for Netflix and YouTube.

Also, TiVo would really like to remind you the Bolt+ (and the cable/OTA Bolt for that matter) support Plex, just in case you had it in your head that an HDHomeRun would be a better option.

The TiVo Bolt+ costs $500, not including the monthly service fee. It will be available on September 15 through TiVo’s site, Amazon, Magnolia stores and custom install dealers across the US.

10
Sep

Fluance Signature Series Floorstanding Speakers review – CNET


The Good The Fluance Signature Series Floorstanding Speakers look like a million bucks with an attractive piano finish and striking yellow midrange driver. The huge 8-inch drivers are able to deliver all but the very deepest of bass.

The Bad Poor documentation about how to install the floor spikes. Competitors offer more flexibility and smoother sound for the same or less.

The Bottom Line The Fluance Signature Series Hi-Fi Three-Way Floorstanding Speakers offer gorgeous looks, impressive size and exciting sound quality.

Visit manufacturer site for details.

At the budget end of the A/V spectrum, Canadian company Fluance has been making its name as a high-quality speaker manufacturer since the turn of the century. After a run of seriously impressive Bluetooth speakers, the company is spreading its design wings and gliding from entry-level up into enthusiast territory with its new Signature Series floorstanders.

The Signature Series Hi-Fi Three-Way Floorstanding Speakers are available separately for $799 or as part of a 5.0 system (with surrounds and a center channel, but no subwoofer) for $999.

We first encountered the Signature Series in February 2016 and were unimpressed with what we heard. While movie sound was fine, the speakers couldn’t attempt any kind of music at all. We scored them a 6.6 out of 10. But it appears the company has made some tweaks, and while the outward design appears identical, we’re happy to say the wait has been worth it.

The floorstanders’ main strength remains the sizable 8-inch drivers, which virtually do away with the need for a separate subwoofer. But the midrange has now had the upgrade the speakers deserved. Music is expressive, wide-open and has a dynamic heft it lacked before.

While the Fluance’s main attraction is their overwhelming size and astonishing looks, the designers have tried to ensure that the speakers now sound every bit their $800. To the designer’s credit, we can say they’ve been quite successful.

Meanwhile, Fluance representatives have informed us if customers who bought their speakers in 2016 have an issue they should contact Fluance to discuss replacement (with potential shipping costs covered).

Editors’ note: This review has been updated to reflect the new version of the speakers available as of September 2016. The rating has been raised to account for the improved sound.

Design

fluance-signature-series-02.jpgView full gallery Sarah Tew/CNET

It seems Fluance is participating in an arms race to create the biggest speakers possible, a race in which it is the only participant. The company’s previous flagship, the Fluance XL7F, was a stupendously large speaker. We said at the time that it dwarfed the others before it.

fluance-signature-series-05.jpgfluance-signature-series-05.jpg
View full gallery
Sarah Tew/CNET

Well, imagine a school bus being swallowed by a sperm whale and you get an idea of how big the new Signature Series is. At 4 feet tall, they could be the largest consumer speakers we’ll ever see in the CNET audio lab.

And heavy. At 62.4 pounds per speaker, you’ll definitely need help from a friend to set them up.

fluance-signature-series-04.jpgfluance-signature-series-04.jpg
View full gallery
Sarah Tew/CNET

The Fluance is a three-way speaker with a 1-inch silk dome tweeter and a 5-inch yellow glass fiber driver, which looks smaller than it is thanks to the enormous dual 8-inch bass woofers it sits above.

The crossover network seems to have had some attention this time around, for while the original points were set at (an insanely high) 1.2kHz and 2.3kHz to the tweeter, the blend is much more natural.

10
Sep

Laurastar Smart Release Date, Price and Specs – CNET


img0139.jpg

Ashlee Clark Thompson/CNET

I hate wrinkles. I also hate ironing my clothes. So I’m probably not the target audience for the more-than $1,000 smart ironing system that a Swiss company debuted at an international trade show. Yes, you read that correctly.

The Laurastar Smart was on display last week at the IFA trade show in Berlin. The Laurastar Smart, which will start at $1,400 (roughly £1,050 in the UK and AU$1,825) when it comes to the US in the coming months, includes an ironing board with a built-in water tank and filter and a Bluetooth-enabled iron.

The iron connects to an app that provides ironing tutorials and real-time guides to improve your ironing technique, just in case you’ve reached that point in your life when you can afford a $1,400 iron but don’t know how to use it. The app also gives you statistics about your equipment, such as your water levels, how much your ironing board cover is wearing and information about how much time you really spend ironing, a fun tidbit you can throw out at cocktail parties whilst wearing a crisp button-down that you ironed yourself.

Laurastar has spent more than 35 years making high-end ironing systems, some of which cost as much as $3,000 (about £2,250 and AU$3,910), according to the company’s website, so the shocking price isn’t new to its product line. Some features of its products include “a blower and vacuum system to prevent unwanted creases” and an integrated steam generator. And it looks like real-life people have not only bought, but like their expensive ironing system.

The casual ironer won’t need such an involved and expensive system as the Laurastar Smart or the brand’s other products. But maybe folks who iron a lot like seamstresses and tailors would find it useful? Honestly, I’m struggling to come up with a worthwhile reason to buy an iron that costs as much as an oven.

The fabulous appliances and smart home gear…
See full gallery

aeg-sensecook.jpg

aeg9000erserie.jpg

my-aeg-app.jpg

ifadayone-25.jpg

14 of 29

Next
Prev

  • For all of CNET’s coverage from IFA, click here
10
Sep

Hunter 44157 review – CNET


The Good The $25 Hunter 44157 thermostat hides all of its clutter under a convenient plastic case. Its blue backlight makes the display easier to read in low-light conditions.

The Bad This thermostat’s ambient temperature reading was consistently 2 degrees lower than the four competitors I tested alongside it. I heard a faint, but distinct humming sound every time I pressed a button.

The Bottom Line I like the design of this simple programmable thermostat, but its low temperature reading and humming sound make it hard to recommend.

I recently moved from a home with a Wi-Fi-enabled Nest Learning Thermostat to a home with a very old, very basic programmable temperature controller. Maybe it’s because I regularly write about connected thermostats, but I find my comparatively “simpler” model much more confusing.

So I decided to investigate. Is this the case with all inexpensive programmable models or just mine? After testing out the Lux TX500U and the Honeywell RTHL2310B, I realized some affordable thermostats are fairly straightforward. Others, like the $25 programmable 44157 by Hunter, unfortunately aren’t.

5 programmable thermostats you can find for…
See full gallery

programmablethermostatspictures-1-1.jpg

emerson-17f8-151-thermostat-product-photos-1.jpg

emerson-17f8-151-thermostat-product-photos-1.jpg

dumbthermostatspictures-4-1.jpg

emerson-17f8-151-thermostat-product-photos-1.jpg

15 of 15

Next
Prev

You can only set two programs with 5-2 thermostats like the 44157 — one for the weekdays and another for the weekends. That means this Hunter thermostat is fairly limited in terms of features.

At the same time, it has a jumble of buttons that aren’t particularly responsive, a faint, but annoying buzzing/humming sound that emanates from the thermostat for a brief period after you press any button, and an ambient temperature reading that runs roughly 2 degrees cooler on average than any of the other four models we tested alongside it.

In other thermostat news:
  • These smart thermostats steal the heating and cooling spotlight
  • Ecobee’s smart thermostat closes in on Nest
  • Same great Nest, now with even better looks
  • Thermostat buying guide

Ultimately, you’re only spending 25 bucks on this thing, so it isn’t a huge loss if you just bought Hunter’s 44157 for your home. You will have to interact with it to set programs and to override those programs during times when you want manual control, though. And this thing is downright annoying. I’d get the $30 Lux TX500U or the $25 Honeywell RTHL2310B instead.

Note: This thermostat is compatible with basic heating and cooling systems; click here for more details. If you have questions about installation, consult a professional.

Comparing thermostats

Honeywell RTHL2310B Hunter 44157 Emerson 1F78-151 White-Rodgers P200 Lux TX500U
MSRP: $25 Lowe’s: $24.98 MSRP: $25 Amazon: $20.59 MSRP: $43 Amazon: $26 MSRP: $50 Amazon: $23.77 MSRP: $30 Amazon/Home Depot: $30
White White White White White
Yes, two AAA Yes, two AA Yes, two AAA Yes, two AA Yes, two AA
Yes, green Yes, blue No Yes, green Yes, blue
4.75 x 3.4 x 1 inches 8 x 6 x 1.6 inches 6.2 x 4.2 x 1.8 inches 6.5 x 4.5 x 1.5 inches 5.4 x 3.4 x 1.1 inches
Digital Digital Digital Digital Digital
Yes, 5-2 Yes, 5-2 Yes, 5-2 Yes, 5-1-1 Yes, 5-2
10
Sep

Emerson 1F78-151 review – CNET


The Good The Emerson 1F78-151 thermostat reliably automates your weekday and weekend temperature presets.

The Bad It feels cheap, has a particularly bland design and doesn’t come with a backlight for making manual adjustments in low-light conditions.

The Bottom Line Emerson’s 1F78-151 programmable thermostat is fine, but its competitors offer more in terms of features and design.

Of the five affordable programmable thermostats I’ve reviewed to date, Emerson’s $43 1F78-151 — sold on Amazon for $26 — is the least interesting. Sure, it will dutifully adjust the temperature for you four times a day, but it really doesn’t have much else going for it, and that makes it hard to recommend for purchase over most of its competitors.

5 programmable thermostats you can find for…
See full gallery

programmablethermostatspictures-1-1.jpg

emerson-17f8-151-thermostat-product-photos-1.jpg

emerson-17f8-151-thermostat-product-photos-1.jpg

dumbthermostatspictures-4-1.jpg

emerson-17f8-151-thermostat-product-photos-1.jpg

15 of 15

Next
Prev

To begin, the 1F78-151 doesn’t come with a backlight like the Lux TX500U, the Hunter 44157, the White-Rodgers P200 and the Honeywell RTHL2310B. Of course, not having a “nightlight” feature isn’t exactly a deal-breaker at this price range, but it would definitely make the small display easier to read — especially in low-light situations.

This thermostat also feels cheaply made from its white plastic casing to its buttons and its display. I know, all of these thermostats cost at or under $30, so what should I expect? But some of these competitors really do stand out by comparison, especially the streamlined, backlit Lux TX500U.

In other thermostat news:
  • These smart thermostats steal the heating and cooling spotlight
  • Ecobee’s smart thermostat closes in on Nest
  • Same great Nest, now with even better looks
  • Thermostat buying guide

To appear more minimal, many manufacturers attach a plastic covering to their thermostats. That way, you can flip open the covering when you need to access certain buttons and can otherwise keep them covered. Instead, Emerson’s 1F78-151 displays everything up front in a way that looks cluttered.

Its default is also to flash the time and the current ambient temperature reading, something I find slightly annoying. I would much rather the thermostat display stay fixed and not alternate between different types of information. The Emerson 1F78-151 is decent, but I would consider the Lux TX500U or the Honeywell RTHL2310B instead.

Note: This thermostat is compatible with basic heating and cooling systems; click here for more details. If you have questions about installation, consult a professional.

Comparing thermostats

Honeywell RTHL2310B Hunter 44157 Emerson 1F78-151 White-Rodgers P200 Lux TX500U
MSRP: $25 Lowe’s: $24.98 MSRP: $25 Amazon: $20.59 MSRP: $43 Amazon: $26 MSRP: $50 Amazon: $23.77 MSRP: $30 Amazon/Home Depot: $30
White White White White White
Yes, two AAA Yes, two AA Yes, two AAA Yes, two AA Yes, two AA
Yes, green Yes, blue No Yes, green Yes, blue
4.75 x 3.4 x 1 inches 8 x 6 x 1.6 inches 6.2 x 4.2 x 1.8 inches 6.5 x 4.5 x 1.5 inches 5.4 x 3.4 x 1.1 inches
Digital Digital Digital Digital Digital
Yes, 5-2 Yes, 5-2 Yes, 5-2 Yes, 5-1-1 Yes, 5-2