Comparison Drones: DJI Spark VS DJI Mavic

Drones have taken over the market and you might be thinking of buying one. There are so many choices in the market that anyone can become confused about what might be the best one for them. In case, you are confused between DJI Spark and DJI Mavic then, look here for Drone Comparison!

DJI is one of the renowned companies that most people go after when it comes to drones. It has built its image in the market for a while. Buy this company has launched many drones such as DJI Mavic, DJI Spark, DJI Phantom, DJI Inspire, and so on. It becomes really difficult to go with which one. Here, you will find a comparison between DJI Mavic and DJI Spark, two of the most popular drones of DJI.

DJI Mavic was launched in 2016, whereas DJI Spark in 2017. So, let’s get started with features of both these drones!

1. Size

There are some differences between the two drones in terms of design. The biggest difference between Spark and Mavic is their portability and compact size. Mavic has folded arms that make it easier to carry, whereas Spark has rigid arms. On being folded, Mavic becomes much thinner and narrower than Spark.

On the other hand, Spark has a lighter weight as well as smaller size than Mavic. Spark is of 300 grams while Mavic has 430 grams of weight. So, Mavic comes handy when it comes to size and portability.

2. Color

In terms of color, you get less choice with Mavic that offers colors such as Onyx Black, Flame Red, and Alpine White. With Spark, you get drones in colors like Lava Red, Sunrise Yellow, Meadow Green, Sky Blue, and Alpine White. However, color is not a much problem and you should look for other features while thinking of buying a drone for yourself.

3. Performance

When compared in terms of performance, Mavic outperforms Spark. Spark offers a flight time of 16 minutes but Mavic goes up to an impressive time of 21 minutes. Mavic can be controlled remotely within a transmission range of 4km while Spark has a 2km transmission range. Mavic flies 5,000 meters above the sea level and Spark, as high as 4,000 meters.

In terms of speed, Mavic wins over Spark as it offers a speed up to 42mph in the mode “Sport”, which is 11mph greater than Spark’s maximum speed of 31mph. however, both these drones can stabilize themselves after flying up to 22mph in a bad weather.

4. Camera

Both Mavic and Spark have excellent cameras but surely there’s a difference. Spark has a user-friendly as well as fixed focus camera just like Phantom drones but Mavic has massively improved optics. DJI Spark records video in full HD resolution while DJI Mavic records professional 4k resolution videos at 30 frames a second with a bitrate of 100Mbps up to a maximum. Mavic can also record slow-motion videos in 1080p at 120 frames a second.

In the case of still photography, both cameras offer the same results. Both the drones have ½.3” sensors and f/2.6 aperture lenses that can shoot up to 12Mp stills. However, DJI Mavic comes with an advanced mode for HDR. The three-axis gimbal of Mavic offers extra stability as compared to Spark. All this makes Mavic far more superior than Spark.

5. Cost

At the end, you have to make a choice between the two drones keeping your pocket in mind. DJI Spark and DJI Mavic come at different prices. Spark comes at $499 with no additional batteries and no remote. If you want to go with DJI Spark then, it is best to go with Spark Fly-More package that comes with two additional batteries, remote, and a carrying case. This Spark Fly-More package will cost you $699.

DJI Mavic costs $999 while its premium version, Mavic Pro Platinum starts at $1099. It also comes with a Fly-More package at an extra of $300 with some additional batteries, remote, carrying case, propeller guards, and propellers.

However, the prices of these drones keep on changing. You can look for prices on various sites and make a good decision on your own.

After the comparison between Mavic and Spark, it would not be much difficult for you to make a decision. If you want an efficient drone then, you should opt for DJI Mavic as it offers way better features and specifications than Spark. It is a value for money product than DJI Spark.

However, you can go with any drone based on your requirements and needs as both these drones have made a quite popular place in the market. If you are looking something for professional use then, DJI Mavic is the right choice for you. You can even explore other products in the market for a better decision. Hope this Drone Comparison helped you!

Apple Removes 11 Mac App Store Categories From the Categories Tab

Apple has slashed the number of app categories listed in the Mac App Store’s Categories tab, an apparently intentional move that may irk Mac users and developers who rely on the tab to aid app discoverability.

The tab now lists just 10 categories, down from the 21 it had listed ever since the revamped Mac App Store debuted with the launch of macOS Mojave in September. The missing categories include Finance, Lifestyle, Sports, Weather, Medical, Travel, Education, Reference, Entertainment, Health & Fitness, and News. That leaves the following 10 categories that users can still browse individually:

• Business
• Developer Tools
• Games
• Graphics & Design
• Music

• Photography
• Productivity
• Social Networking
• Utilities
• Video

When a developer submits their app to Apple for inclusion on the Mac App Store, they can assign the app a primary category and a secondary category. The primary category is particularly important for discoverability, as this is the one in which the app appears when users browse the Mac App Store or filter search results. Up until yesterday, it also determined the app’s placement in the Categories tab.

@AppleSupport Mac App Store is no longer showing all categories, missing Finance, Medical and other categories. Reproducible on different Macs. pic.twitter.com/PUtN95GxdN

— Debit & Credit (@DebitCreditApp) November 1, 2018

OK, thanks. As it turns out, what you are noticing is expected behavior. We always appreciate hearing customer feedback. You can leave your thoughts here: https://t.co/eTPVYVFyd8

— Apple Support (@AppleSupport) November 1, 2018

It’s unclear at present why Apple has decided to hamstring the Categories tab, as the categories that are missing are still being used to classify apps in the Mac App Store, and Apple’s documentation for developers on choosing a category for their Mac app hasn’t changed. Currently, iPhone and iPad users remain able to browse all 21 categories individually in the iOS App Store app.

We’ve reached out to Apple for comment regarding the change to the Mac App Store and will update this article if we learn more.

Related Roundup: macOS MojaveTag: Mac App Store
Discuss this article in our forums

WhatsApp finally gives in to the lure of cash-generating ads

WhatsApp’s co-founders always promised to keep their app ad-free. But after they both quit, it seemed inevitable that its owner, Facebook, would find a way to incorporate ads as part of efforts to monetize the popular messaging service.

So it comes as no surprise to learn that WhatsApp is gearing up to put ads into its Status feature, the part of the app that lets you share text, photos, videos, and GIFs that disappear after 24 hours — yes, it is a lot like Stories on Snapchat and Instagram.

The news of WhatsApp’s upcoming effort to squeeze some cash out of the smartphone app comes courtesy of WhatsApp vice president Chris Daniels, who told the Economic Times this week: “We are going to be putting ads in ‘Status’.”

The executive added: “That is going to be [the] primary monetization mode for the company as well as an opportunity for businesses to reach people on WhatsApp.”

Daniels didn’t say when the ads will start appearing, but his revelation suggests work on incorporating them into WhatsApp is in the advanced stages of preparation and so they may show up soon.

Facebook acquired WhatsApp in 2014 for a colossal $19 billion. At the time the messaging app had 450 million monthly active users globally, and has since added another billion.

Co-founders Jan Koum and Brian Acton launched WhatsApp in 2004, with its only income generated by a $1 annual fee charged after a year’s use. That was dropped in 2016, making the app free for everyone. Even then, Koum and Acton promised that despite the move to ditch the fee, there would be “absolutely no ads” appearing in the app.

But then, amid reports of tension between WhatsApp’s co-founders and their bosses at Facebook about how to develop the app, Acton quit the company in 2017, with Koum following a few months later.

The pair’s departure opened the way for Facebook to proceed with various changes to WhatsApp, particularly regarding efforts to monetize it, and the incorporation of ads looks certain to be a lucrative move for the social networking giant.

How users will respond to what is essentially a broken promise remains to seen. With so many of them now long-time users of WhatsApp, it’s unlikely that any kind of mass exodus will occur, though Facebook will need to be careful with parameters such as ad frequency in order to limit any irritation among WhatsApp’s community of 1.5 billion people.

Editors’ Recommendations

• Some major Facebook investors want to oust Zuckerberg after scandals
• College students — Instagram is testing a new feature that’s just for you
• Apple acquires music-seeking app Shazam
• Instagram’s co-founders have resigned from the Facebook-owned company
• Spurred by a federal discrimination lawsuit, Facebook is cleaning up ads

Shazam hooks up with Instagram Stories for another way to share songs

Shazam

Shazam’s latest update for iDevices lets you add songs to Instagram Stories in a few taps.

Version 12.3 of Apple-owned Shazam landed this week, and the new feature is super-simple to use.

All you do is Shazam a song in the usual way to identify it, tap on the three dots to the right of the “buy” or “add to” button, and then on the share button at the bottom of the display. You’ll then see a list of options that should now include Instagram Stories. Select it and your Story will display the name of the track, the artist, and how many Shazams it’s received to date.

Any ‘grammers who view the Story can, if they’re not yet using the app, tap on the “more on Shazam” link to learn more about it.

Shazam names any song in seconds

Shazam enables users to identify songs in a matter of seconds simply by listening to it, and works anywhere with any audio source. Once the track has been identified, you get a ton of options about what to do next, such as open it in streaming services like Spotify or Apple Music, buy it on iTunes, or share it via your social media feeds.

The free app has been downloaded over a billion times globally, with people using it to identify music tracks more than 20 million times each day.

Apple completed its acquisition of Shazam in September, 2018, making it free of ads in the process. The Cupertino, California-based tech giant reportedly paid $400 million to close the deal.

“Apple and Shazam have a long history together,” Oliver Schusser, Apple’s vice president of Apple Music, said at the time, explaining that Shazam was one of the first apps available when it threw open the doors to its App Store 10 years ago.

London-based Shazam launched its music ID service in 2002, though it wasn’t until shortly after the arrival of the iPhone in 2007 that it really took off.

The latest update featuring support for Instagram Stories can be found via your smartphone’s app store app, or by hitting this iTunes link. There’s no word yet on the feature coming to Android.

Editors’ Recommendations

• Apple acquires music-seeking app Shazam
• Snap, then shop? Snapchat’s camera will soon buy stuff from Amazon
• Apple Music recommendations could get superpowers thanks to latest acquisition
• The best podcasts of 2018
• The best iOS 12 features

Your Google Home Hub won’t get hacked, but it may be rebooted

Users on the same local network can “talk” to a Google Home Hub using the same API that the Google Home app is using.

Hackers aren’t going to brick your new Google Home Hub, but Google does need to fix a few things when it comes to the smart display’s network security settings. Kind of.

It started when security advocate Jerry Gamblin did what a security advocate does and scanned his local network after he hooked up his Google Home Hub. He found which network ports were open and listening, and what they were probably configured to listen for.

I am not an IOT security expert, but I am pretty sure an unauthenticated curl statement should not be able to reboot the @madebygoogle home hub. pic.twitter.com/gCWFm5Ofyb

— Jerry Gamblin (@JGamblin) October 27, 2018

To most people, this doesn’t mean much, but to others, it shows that:

• The Google Home Hub is an advanced Chromecast (or dumbed-down Android TV device, take your pick) and not an Android Things device like the Lenovo Smart Display and other similar products.
• It’s probably “susceptible” to the same kinds of network commands that Chromecasts are, like this one that will force an OTA update if you would rather not wait in line.

We already knew that the Home Hub wasn’t running the same operating system as other smart displays, as Ars Technica reported. Now we know a little more about what operating system it is running, and how to “talk” to it and make it do things.

The Google Home Hub is really just a fancy Chromecast.

Imagine Android with the things needed to install and run normal Android apps (Dalvik and Bionic if you’re into this sort of thing) removed and a proprietary multicast DNS DIAL (the Discovery and Launch network protocol developed by Netflix and YouTube) style binary blob dropped in their place. If you knew how to communicate with that mDNS software, like say the Google Home app does, you could perform basic device functions using a command line network connection to those open ports Gamblin found.

Eureka! It turns out you can talk to that “secret” API that a Google Home Hub is using to communicate and all the things you can do are slowly but surely being documented.

This includes things like forcing a reboot or even a remote factory reset command. While not ideal, these won’t “brick” your Google Home Hub like we’ve seen being reported, but you could be forced to open the Google Home app on a phone and reconnect. It’s also important to remember that you need to be on the same local network as the Home Hub, so nobody can do any of this over the internet.

Google needs to lock things down so that only the Google Home app can “talk” to the Hub.

Google will have to find a way to clamp this down now that it’s moved away from “hacker” forums like XDA and into the mainstream. The Google Home app still needs to be able to do everything it can do now, but a way to authenticate itself with a Home Hub so another device on the network can’t connect needs to be implemented.

If you just want everything to work, you don’t have to be too alarmed unless you have someone connected to your Wi-Fi that likes to mess with things. If you are one of those people who like to mess with things, I’d recommend you get on it now before Google locks down remote access to the undocumented — and mistakenly open to the public — API.

Either way, the sky isn’t falling and your Home Hub is going to be just fine.

First 2018 MacBook Air Benchmark Shows Moderate Gains Over 2017 MacBook Air and MacBook

The first benchmark for the 2018 MacBook Air surfaced on Geekbench today, giving us our first look at how the low-power 7W Amber Lake Intel chip in the machine measures up to the performance of other Macs in Apple’s lineup.

Equipped with a 1.6GHz Intel Core i5-8210Y chip and 16GB of RAM, the benchmarked MacBook Air earned a single-core score of 4248 and a multi-core score of 7828.

As should be no surprise, it’s significantly better than the previous-generation MacBook Air equipped with a 1.8GHz Broadwell processor, which earned a single-core score of 3335 and a multi-core score of 6119.

It’s faster than the fastest Core M chip in the 2017 MacBook models, but not by much. The 1.4GHz MacBook earned a single-core score of 3925 and a multi-core score of 7567, while the base model with a 1.2GHz Core M chip earned a single-core score of 3527 and a multi-core score of 6654.

Compared to MacBook Pro models, it’s not too far off from the 2018 13-inch Touch Bar MacBook Pro with a 2.3GHz Intel Core i5 processor when it comes to single-core performance, but it can’t compete with the four cores in the 2018 MacBook Pro. That machine earned a single-core score of 4504 and a multi-core score of 16464.

It’s also slower than the 2017 13-inch MacBook Pro sans Touch Bar that Apple still sells, which earned a single-core score of 4314 and a multi-core score of 9071.

Single-Core Performance

• 2018 MacBook Air – 4248
• 2017 MacBook Air – 3335
• 1.4GHz 2017 MacBook – 3925
• 1.3GHz 2017 MacBook – 3630
• 1.2GHz 2017 MacBook – 3527
• 2.3GHz 2018 MacBook Pro – 4504
• 2.3GHz 2017 MacBook Pro – 4314

Multi-Core Performance

• 2018 MacBook Air – 7828
• 2017 MacBook Air – 6119
• 1.4GHz 2017 MacBook – 7567
• 1.3GHz 2017 MacBook – 6974
• 1.2GHz 2017 MacBook – 6654
• 2.3GHz 2018 MacBook Pro – 16464
• 2.3GHz 2017 MacBook Pro – 9071

Previous MacBook Air chips used 15W U-series chips from Intel, but the 2018 model is using a lower-power 7W Y-series chip, and there were some concerns about its performance relative to the rest of the Mac lineup.

Based on these Geekbench scores, which aren’t necessarily indicative of how these machines will perform in the real world, the MacBook Air is superior to the MacBook lineup at this time, but falls short of the base-level MacBook Pro, which is about right given its price point ($1,199 for the Air vs. $1,299 for the Pro). What the Mac lineup will look like if and when the 12-inch MacBook is refreshed remains to be seen.

Additional benchmarking results should be available soon, as the MacBook Air is set to arrive to the first customers on Wednesday, November 7, and MacBook Air reviews should come out before then.

Related Roundup: MacBook AirBuyer’s Guide: MacBook Air (Buy Now)
Discuss this article in our forums

Apple misses estimates for the iPhone, but still made more money than in 2017

Apple is having a pretty good quarter. The company has announced its fourth-quarter 2018 earnings, showing earnings that beat Wall Street estimates, thanks largely to the heightened average selling price of the iPhone.

While Apple sold about as many iPhones as it did in the fourth quarter of 2017, the iPhones it did sell were more expensive, basically meaning that the company made far more than it did with the same number of units last year. The average selling price of the iPhone came in at $793 — up 28 percent compared to 2017’s fourth quarter. The company sold 46.89 million iPhone units in the fourth quarter of the 2018 fiscal year, which didn’t quite hit the 47.5 million units expected.

Interestingly, Apple also announced that it would stop providing data related to the number of units it sold. That’s to say, it will no longer announce how many iPhones it has sold, though it will say how much it made from iPhones. It’s possible Apple has chosen to stop reporting on unit sales due to slowing sales in some market segments, though Apple argued that the decision was because earnings were more important than unit sales anyway.

The iPhone isn’t the only contributor to such high Apple earnings results. Alongside the new iPhone series, Apple also took the wraps off of the new Apple Watch Series 4, which has received excellent reviews since its release. Apple’s gadgets category, which includes AirPods and the Apple Watch, reached $4.23 billion in revenue, which is an increase of 31 percent over last year.

Services is another segment that Apple is doing well in. Services include things like Apple Pay, Apple Music, iCloud, and the App Store, and reached $9.98 billion, which is also up from last year, by 17 percent. Still, that’s not quite as high as what Wall Street estimated at $10.2 billion. Overall, Apple’s revenue hit $62.9 billion, more than the $61.57 billion forecast.

Despite excellent financial results, there is some cause for concern. The rising prices of Apple devices really just offset slowing sales — so while Apple may have made more money than previous years in many segments, it did not sell quite as many devices.  Because of that, by the time of this writing Apple shares had fallen 4 percent.

It’s likely Apple’s first quarter of the 2019 fiscal year will be pretty stellar, too. The company recently took the wraps off of a new MacBook Air and Mac Mini, both of which were long overdue updates, and will likely perform well in the holiday season as the new iPhone and Apple Watch will likely do, too. Apple is expected to make between $89 and $93 billion during the holiday season, which is up from the $88.3 billion revenue for the first quarter of 2018.

Editors’ Recommendations

• Huawei overtakes Apple as the second-largest smartphone seller
• Apple iPhone XS: News, release, specs, and more
• Apple iPhone XS vs. iPhone XS Max vs. iPhone XR
• iPhone XS review
• How to buy the iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, and iPhone XR in the U.K.

Apple misses estimates for the iPhone, but still made more money than in 2017

Apple is having a pretty good quarter. The company has announced its fourth-quarter 2018 earnings, showing earnings that beat Wall Street estimates, thanks largely to the heightened average selling price of the iPhone.

While Apple sold about as many iPhones as it did in the fourth quarter of 2017, the iPhones it did sell were more expensive, basically meaning that the company made far more than it did with the same number of units last year. The average selling price of the iPhone came in at $793 — up 28 percent compared to 2017’s fourth quarter. The company sold 46.89 million iPhone units in the fourth quarter of the 2018 fiscal year, which didn’t quite hit the 47.5 million units expected.

Interestingly, Apple also announced that it would stop providing data related to the number of units it sold. That’s to say, it will no longer announce how many iPhones it has sold, though it will say how much it made from iPhones. It’s possible Apple has chosen to stop reporting on unit sales due to slowing sales in some market segments, though Apple argued that the decision was because earnings were more important than unit sales anyway.

The iPhone isn’t the only contributor to such high Apple earnings results. Alongside the new iPhone series, Apple also took the wraps off of the new Apple Watch Series 4, which has received excellent reviews since its release. Apple’s gadgets category, which includes AirPods and the Apple Watch, reached $4.23 billion in revenue, which is an increase of 31 percent over last year.

Services is another segment that Apple is doing well in. Services include things like Apple Pay, Apple Music, iCloud, and the App Store, and reached $9.98 billion, which is also up from last year, by 17 percent. Still, that’s not quite as high as what Wall Street estimated at $10.2 billion. Overall, Apple’s revenue hit $62.9 billion, more than the $61.57 billion forecast.

Despite excellent financial results, there is some cause for concern. The rising prices of Apple devices really just offset slowing sales — so while Apple may have made more money than previous years in many segments, it did not sell quite as many devices.  Because of that, by the time of this writing Apple shares had fallen 4 percent.

It’s likely Apple’s first quarter of the 2019 fiscal year will be pretty stellar, too. The company recently took the wraps off of a new MacBook Air and Mac Mini, both of which were long overdue updates, and will likely perform well in the holiday season as the new iPhone and Apple Watch will likely do, too. Apple is expected to make between $89 and $93 billion during the holiday season, which is up from the $88.3 billion revenue for the first quarter of 2018.

Editors’ Recommendations

• Huawei overtakes Apple as the second-largest smartphone seller
• Apple iPhone XS: News, release, specs, and more
• Apple iPhone XS vs. iPhone XS Max vs. iPhone XR
• iPhone XS review
• How to buy the iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, and iPhone XR in the U.K.

Smartphone Battery Life May Be on the Decline Because Lithium Ion Batteries Can’t Keep Up With New Technology

Overall smartphone battery life may be declining due to the increasing demands new technologies place on lithium ion batteries, according to smartphone testing done by The Washington Post.

In a series of battery life tests where multiple smartphone models from the past few years were set at the same brightness and forced to reload the same sites, newer smartphones were not able to last as long as older devices.

When it comes to the iPhone, for example, the iPhone XS died an average of 21 minutes earlier than the previous-generation iPhone X. Battery life impact was most noticeable with the Google Pixel 3, which lasted an hour and a half less than the Pixel 2.

According to The Washington Post, the iPhone XR, which uses an LCD instead of an OLED display, was a notable exception, performing well on the battery life tests. The iPhone XR boasts the longest battery life of any iPhone with 25 hours of talk time, 15 hours of internet use, 16 hours of video playback, and 65 hours of audio playback.

It lasted the longest in the battery test, besting the Pixel 3XL, the Samsung Galaxy Note 9, and the iPhone XS Max.

Apple’s iPhone XR, the new phone I recommend to most people, has a different approach. It scales back on the screen tech — lower resolution, less bright and lower-quality color — in ways that benefit battery life tremendously: The XR lasted 3 hours longer than the top iPhone XS, even though the its screen is actually a smidge larger. (Bonus: It also costs $250 less.)

Nadim Maluf, CEO of battery optimization firm Qnovo, told The Washington Post that batteries improve at about “5 percent per year” but smartphone power consumption is growing faster than that.

The Washington Post consulted with other tech sites like Tom’s Guide and CNET, and came to the conclusion that high-resolution OLED displays and cellular connectivity are major factors that impact battery life.

Turning down display brightness and using WiFi when possible, two well-known techniques for preserving battery life, are among the site’s recommendations for eking more juice out of a smartphone.

The Washington Post’s battery life test focused on the display, but other battery life tests, such as one conducted by Consumer Reports using a machine that opens up apps, had different results, with the iPhone XS beating the iPhone X due to improvements Apple has made with the processor.

Variations in battery life due to different tests and different real-life usage situations can make it difficult to tell whether overall battery life is increasing or decreasing over time, says the site.

Battery company Onavo’s CEO believes that consumers should “start getting ready for compromise,” settling for smartphones with increasingly bigger batteries that result in larger, heavier devices or lesser technologies like the LCD display in the iPhone XR.

Related Roundups: iPhone XS, iPhone XRBuyer’s Guide: iPhone XS (Buy Now), iPhone XR (Buy Now)
Discuss this article in our forums

Apple Blames Currency Fluctuations and Uncertainty in Emerging Countries for Weak Holiday Sales Estimates

Though iPhone revenue was up in 4Q 2018, fourth quarter iPhone XS and XS Max sales were not as strong as expected, and iPhone sales growth was essentially flat. Apple sold 46.9 million iPhones during the quarter, compared to 46.7 million in the year-ago quarter, missing analyst estimates.

Apple’s $89 to $93 billion revenue forecast for the first fiscal quarter of 2019 is rather also cautious, which Apple blamed on foreign exchange costs, issues with supply/demand balance, and weakness in emerging markets.

“Virtually every foreign currency has depreciated against the dollar over the last 12 months,” said Apple CFO Luca Maestri. “That adds 200 basis points of headwinds to the tune of $2 billion to our revenue.”

Uncertainty in emerging markets is also a factor. “There’s some level of uncertainty at the macroeconomic model in some emerging countries where consumer confidence is not as high,” said Maestri.

Maestri also said that Apple has launched an “unprecedented number” of new products over the course of the last six weeks, and Apple has “some uncertainty” around supply/demand balance for some of these products. The launch timing of the new iPhones is also a factor, with the iPhone XR coming later than the XS and the XS Max. This had an effect on Apple’s Q4 revenue and will also impact Q1.

Despite the cautious guidance for the first fiscal quarter of 2018, Apple is “very excited” about its lineup of products and services entering the holiday shopping season, and Maestri said that Apple has the “strongest lineup” it’s ever had.

Going forward, Apple does not plan to break down unit sales of the iPhone, iPad, and Mac, a major change to the way that earnings data is presented. Apple will, however, continue to provide details on overall iPhone, iPad, and Mac revenue.

Apple CEO Tim Cook and Apple CFO Luca Maestri explained during today’s earnings call that Apple does not believe that providing unit sales is relevant for the company at this point.

Tag: earnings
Discuss this article in our forums