Uber, but for toxic techbro culture

Some companies are just born with an infinite number of chances to keep doing everything wrong and yet somehow seem immune to the consequences. Uber is one of those companies. Uber’s latest scandal — a fat hack and its dirty cover-up — is just one in a long line of Uber-riffic examples on just how far a certain kind of privilege gets you.

The ride-sharing company only this week admitted to getting seriously hacked in October 2016. Its breach exposed personal information of 57 million users and leaked the license numbers of 600,000 drivers. Uber didn’t report the breach to anyone, especially not victims or regulators. The company paid $100K to the hackers in hush money (as if that actually works) and concealed the payment in an expense column called “bug bounty.”

Uber’s new CEO Dara Khosrowshahi found out about it just after he took over from Travis Kalanick in September, but sat on it for two more months while he ordered an internal investigation.

The company’s Chief Security Officer Joe Sullivan was ousted over the debacle, a mess that brought state lawsuits and federal questions. A few days after kinda-sorta facing the press over it, a letter emerged saying that Sullivan and his fellow security officers Craig Clark and Matt Henley insisted on using encrypted, disappearing messaging apps to avoid creating evidence that could be used in a lawsuit.

It’s a uniquely Uber state of affairs. Yet this wasn’t the first time Sullivan and Henley’s Uber team purposely used apps like Wickr to avoid leaving a trail.

Back in July 2016, four months before the hack and cover-up, a Yale researcher filed suit against Uber alleging price-fixing and violation of antitrust law. It later came out that Uber’s Chief Security Officer, the same Joe Sullivan, was asked by Uber lawyers to dig up dirt on the Yale researcher.

Sullivan — incidentally, Facebook’s former Chief Security Officer — forwarded the attorney’s request to the company’s head of Global Threat Intelligence, Mathew Henley — also incidentally Facebook’s former “e-crimes manager.” Court-obtained documents showed that both parties used Wickr and encrypted email “to avoid potential discovery issues.”

The kind of malignant hubris it takes to make the day-to-day of a security team into a premeditated harm machine is remarkable enough on its own. I mean, that’s quite a culture you’ve got there. Just imagine the interesting things Facebook’s security team must’ve gotten up to!

But hey. That was then, and this is Uber.

Uber launched in March 2009, when San Francisco was still reeling from the Great Recession. As is the custom, around every ten years a tech bubble bursts. All the techies helplessly watched as their mostly useless, perennially over-funded ideas exploded in their faces and made them as penniless as the poor people they’d previously stepped over to get their lattes.

The economy tanked; former high-rolling, coke-huffing, web-famous dot-com douchebags around town suddenly found themselves working in cafes, bitterly wondering why the meritocracy had forsaken them. Future Uber drivers, one and all.

All I’m saying is, it takes a special kind of person to fantasize about a white-glove, luxury, on-demand car service during a brutal recession — and launch it in a city with a world-famous homeless crisis. Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp, the two techbros who created Uber are those kind of people. The kind that start a company that not only embraced an obsession with flaunted wealth to rival the 1980s, but embodied the ideas and ideals of a libertarian playground.

And by “embodied” and “ideals,” I really mean “performed a Stanford Prison Experiment on everyone who wasn’t an executive.”

Uber was the ultimate “unicorn.” The darling of the startup scene. Uber’s early success meant that nearly every pitch by startup jocks “in Silicon Valley seemed to morph overnight into an ‘Uber for X’ startup.” Companies worshipped Uber, praying they could become the next “Uber for” anything, copying everything about Uber they possibly could.

And indeed, some were — like Wag, the “Uber for dog walking.” Companies and founders humiliated themselves by saying they were going to be “Uber for shipping,” “Uber for beauty,” and “Uber for bike repair,” among many, many other things (even “Uber for Uber wanna-bes”).

For several long, truly repugnant years in the Bay Area, everyone wanted to be Uber.

The funny thing about libertarian playgrounds like Uber is that they’re really only a playground for the bros at the top. They didn’t name it “Uber” after some god of frat boys and indifference, but it would’ve made sense.

Echoing the aspirations of a slave-owning class was practically the company’s spiritual tagline, as well as the brutal reality of its company culture. Uber centered its business model on drivers as sweatshop labor. It’s re-invention of the workplace was a virulently insecure techbro’s wet dream. Uber onboarded its new employees by having them pledge to Uber’s 14 core values, the heart of which emphasize “meritocracy,” a Silicon Valley principle that has long proven to be foundational to the startup and tech world’s massive race and gender problem. Still, Uber’s prized values also included “toe-stepping,” making bold bets, and to “always be hustlin’.”

That “meritocracy” part is probably the most important piece of this little Grimm’s fairy tale for the ages. It’s the hallmark of white male privilege. If the White House was an engine, the lie of meritocracy — and its key component, white privilege — are its oil.

Not surprisingly, people of color haven’t been part of Uber’s core values. A study last year found that Uber and Lyft have a pattern of discrimination against black passengers. “Waiting times for black Seattle passengers were 35% longer, and Boston drivers cancelled rides for black passengers more than twice as frequently,” press reported.

Anyway, under the banner of “toe-stepping” Uber became Lord of the Flies. After an exhaustive investigation NYT wrote:

Interviews with more than 30 current and former Uber employees, as well as reviews of internal emails, chat logs and tape-recorded meetings, paint a picture of an often unrestrained workplace culture.

(…) One Uber manager groped female co-workers’ breasts at a company retreat in Las Vegas. A director shouted a homophobic slur at a subordinate during a heated confrontation in a meeting. Another manager threatened to beat an underperforming employee’s head in with a baseball bat.

It was almost as if Uber brought its own rope to the gallows. In a 2014 GQ article, Travis Kalanick referred to Uber as “Boober” because of how the company got him laid. Two years later, engineer Susan Fowler published a detailed blog post describing a deeply-ingrained system of discrimination and sexual harassment by her managers. She had gone ignored by Uber’s HR department.

No surprise there: when Eric Alexander was Uber’s president of business in the Asia Pacific he obtained the medical records of a customer who was a rape victim: He was sure she was lying.

Despite the arrest and sentencing of the driver, Alexander refused to believe the woman had actually been raped, and was keen to convince others of this belief. At the same time Kalanick bragged about “Boober” Alexander was showing the rape victim’s medical records to Kalanick and Uber’s SVP Emil Michael. “In addition,” press wrote, “numerous executives at the car-hailing company were either told about the records or shown them.”

According to press covering her post about sexual harassment at Uber, “Ms. Fowler said the culture was stoked — and even fostered — by those at the top of the company.” Shortly after, in an emergency board meeting about the issues Fowler raised one male board member cracked a sexist joke about women talking too much.

It’s hard to figure out which of the 14 core values covers user privacy violations. Would that be “toe stepping”? The most famous incident was when Josh Mohrer bragged in 2014 to a female reporter about tracking her movements in a Uber without her consent. Though the nonconsensual spying — Uber’s so-called “God view” — had been documented as far back as 2011. When the world found out Uber execs were using “God View” feature to nonconsensually spy on customers in real time, the company told press it had strong policies against employees accessing users’ trip information.

But according to Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting, the company wasn’t coming clean. “Uber’s lack of security regarding its customer data was resulting in Uber employees being able to track high profile politicians, celebrities, and even personal acquaintances of Uber employees, including ex-boyfriends/girlfriends, and ex-spouses,” a court declaration detailed.

Interestingly, these very roads led back to Uber’s security department. Former senior security engineer Michael Sierchio told Reveal that Uber’s privacy protections for users were pretty much just a gesture. “When I was at the company, you could stalk an ex or look up anyone’s ride with the flimsiest of justifications,” he said. “It didn’t require anyone’s approval.”

Uber’s company culture, and its conduct, are a reflection of Silicon Valley and all her tech companies. And it’s a free for all! Seriously. If Uber is the ultimate unicorn and a leading example of Valley success, and its playmate Facebook, no one here seems to care about anything but themselves, at least until they’re caught.

There is no end to Uber’s prison experiment on all of us, nor of its self-entitlement at any cost. Kind of like the Trump White House. In fact, it’s a lot like the Trump White House, with whom Kalanick stubbornly defended working with until he was all but forced to resign. Outcry over the Muslim Ban — and Uber’s breaking of the taxi strike at JFK during the detentions, prompted the #DeleteUber hashtag. The pressure for Kalanick to resign from within Uber mounted, as the hashtag cost the company 200,000 users.

Really, so many good times. Remember when California forced Uber to remove its self-driving vehicles from the road? That was last year, when the state canceled the company’s controversial pilot program in San Francisco after a week of reports of dangerous traffic violations, Uber denied the violations even happened, and state officials had to step in.

There was also “Greyball” as reported by the New York Times, “a worldwide program to deceive the authorities in markets where its low-cost ride-hailing service was resisted by law enforcement or, in some instances, had been banned.” But wait, there’s more! In August the public learned that the Justice Department “has taken preliminary steps to investigate whether managers at Uber Technologies Inc. violated a U.S. law against foreign bribery.”

This is all from the company that began this year as the most valuable startup in the world. Yet simultaneously, in January 2017, Uber had lost a historic amount of money in a record amount of time: $2.2 billion in 9 months.

I mean, in case you’re wondering exactly how much a bunch of techbros can get away with.

Kalanick stepped down as CEO in June, much to the outrage of his servile fellow techbros, but Uber still struggles to wrest control from his hands. The firing of security team lead Joe Sullivan after the hack and cover-up investigation seems positive, yet that new CEO Dara Khosrowshahi knew about it for months before its victims did isn’t exactly a great look for a new Uber. Travis Kalanik may be gone, his legacy permeates the walls, the framing, the foundation.

Travis Kalanick himself summed it up best perhaps, when he yelled at an upset driver to ‘take responsibility’ for his ‘own shit’.

Okay, I’ll stop now.

Images: Richard Levine/Corbis via Getty Images (Coffee shop); Mehdi Taamallah/NurPhoto via Getty Images (Wolf of Wall Street / DiCaprio); REUTERS/Danish Siddiqui (Kalanick / Uber)

Twitter is making excuses for allowing hate speech

Twitter sure is having a hard time explaining and enforcing its policies around hate speech. Earlier this week, the company responded to Trump’s retweet of violent anti-Muslim propaganda, telling Engadget that some videos may remain up if they are newsworthy or of public interest. Today, Twitter changed that position, saying that, instead, the tweets in question are still on the service because they are permitted based on the company’s current media policy.

However, Twitter’s policy against hate speech clearly states that “You may not promote violence against or directly attack or threaten other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or disease. We also do not allow accounts whose primary purpose is inciting harm towards others on the basis of these categories.”

The media policy today’s tweet references says that “Some forms of graphic violence or adult content may be permitted in Tweets when they are marked as sensitive media. However, you may not include this type of content in live video, or in profile or header images. Additionally, we may sometimes require you to remove media containing excessively graphic violence out of respect for the deceased and their families if we receive a request from their family or an authorized representative.”

Twitter’s two policies are vague and confusing at best, if not outright conflicting. It’s certainly not good for a platform that continues to be ripe for abuse and similar instances occur regularly. We’ve reached out to the company for further comment and will update this post when we hear back.

To clarify: these videos are not being kept up because they are newsworthy or for public interest. Rather, these videos are permitted on Twitter based on our current media policy. https://t.co/RqEQy3skgc

— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) December 1, 2017

Source: Twitter

3D-printed bacteria ink could be used to treat burns

In a new study published today in Science Advances, researchers present a 3D-printable ink that contains bacteria and they say that depending on what species of bacteria it holds, the ink stands to have a number of useful applications. “Printing using bacteria-containing hydrogels has enormous potential, as there is such a wide range of useful bacteria out there,” Patrick Rühs, an author of the study, said in a statement.

The scientists behind the material have dubbed it “Flink,” for “functional living ink and it’s composed of a hydrogel mixed with both bacteria and the nutrients required to keep that bacteria alive. It can be 3D-printed into nearly any shape, but the challenge was finding the right texture. If the ink is too stiff, the bacteria aren’t be able to move and in some cases aren’t able to secrete useful products, limiting their benefits. However, if it’s too thin, the structures aren’t able to hold their shapes. “The ink must be as viscous as toothpaste and have the consistency of Nivea hand cream,” said Manuel Schaffner, a researcher on the project.

The research is in the early stages, but the ink could be used in many different ways. In the study, the researchers showed that with one type of bacteria, the ink could be used to break down a toxic chemical often produced as a byproduct in the chemical industry while a second type of bacteria that naturally secretes cellulose could be used in medical applications, like burn treatments and skin replacements, for example. With other species of bacteria, the researchers envision uses for cleaning up oil spills, sensing toxins in drinking water or studying how bacteria form biofilms.

The next steps are to find ways of speeding up printing times and scaling up production.

Via: The Verge

Source: Science Advances

MacRumors Giveaway: Win a ‘Baxter’ Storage Shelf for Your iMac

For this week’s giveaway, we’ve teamed up with Understands to give MacRumors readers a chance to win one of several “Baxter” storage solutions for the iMac.

Joe Baxter
Currently available through a Kickstarter project that launched this week, Baxter is a series of rear-mounted storage options designed to add more storage space to your iMac.

Nigel Baxter
There are several different Baxter configurations, each of which is made from a lightweight laminated birch wood and mounts to the back of an iMac. Every one of the Baxters is available with metallic paint, a walnut veneer, a stock image, or a custom print at varying price points. Configurations and starting price points are as follows:

• Nigel Baxter ($45) – A single shelf for the rear of the iMac, able to hold a few accessories.
• Shira Baxter ($45) – A six-shelf arrangement that’s designed to hold hard drives or other small accessories.
• Mary Baxter ($45) – Two wide shelves that can hold twice as much as the Nigel.
• Joe Baxter ($55) – Two shelves like the Mary Baxter, with 8 cable wraps for keeping your cords organized.
• Art Baxter ($75) – A customized backing for the iMac that does not include any shelves.

All of the Baxter prices listed above are entry level. Customization and walnut veneer are more expensive, but for those who have access to a laser machine or who are crafty, there are options to buy raw design files or a DIY kit at much lower prices. Design schematics can be purchased for as little as $2, while DIY kit pricing starts at $20.

Mary Baxter
Baxter storage solutions fit onto the back of iMacs with no tools or adjustments required, and they are compatible with both 21.5 and 27-inch iMac models. Understands says they’ve been manufactured to add stability to the Mac, so the weight of accessories should not be a problem.

Shira Baxter
Baxter storage solutions can be purchased right now from Kickstarter with an estimated ship date of January 2018, but we have 15 to give away to MacRumors readers. Winners can choose the configuration and color of their choice. To enter to win, use the Rafflecopter widget below and enter an email address. Email addresses will be used solely for contact purposes to reach the winners and send the prizes. You can earn additional entries by subscribing to our weekly newsletter, subscribing to our YouTube channel, following us on Twitter, or visiting the MacRumors Facebook page.

Due to the complexities of international laws regarding giveaways, only U.S. residents who are 18 years or older and Canadian residents (excluding Quebec) who have reached the age of majority in their province or territory are eligible to enter. To offer feedback or get more information on the giveaway restrictions, please refer to our Site Feedback section, as that is where discussion of the rules will be redirected.

a Rafflecopter giveawayThe contest will run from today (December 1) at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time through 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time on December 8. The winners will be chosen randomly on December 8 and will be contacted by email. The winners will have 48 hours to respond and provide a shipping address before new winners are chosen.

Tag: giveaway
Discuss this article in our forums

iPhone X Models With Qualcomm Modem Still Have Faster LTE Speeds Than Those With Intel Modems

iPhone X models equipped with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X16 modem get consistently better LTE speeds than versions with Intel’s XMM7480 modem, according to wireless signal testing firm Cellular Insights.

For context, Cellular Insights used professional measurement equipment equipped with four Vivaldi antennas to simulate LTE performance at different distances from a cellular tower with the Qualcomm and Intel models.

Cellular Insights started with a LTE signal from a strong -85dBm, and gradually reduced the power level to simulate moving away from a cellular tower where signal is weaker, until the modems lost their cellular connectivity.

The testing, shared with PC Magazine, was based on performance on LTE Band 4, which is used by every major carrier in the United States except Sprint, as well as in Canada and parts of Latin America.

The results reveal that with only limited attenuation, or signal reduction in simple terms, the iPhone X with an Intel modem started to experience lower LTE download speeds than the iPhone X with a Qualcomm modem.

While both modems started out with 195Mbps of download throughput on a 20MHz carrier, the Qualcomm difference appeared quickly, as the Intel modem dropped to 169Mbps at -87dBm. The Qualcomm modem took an additional -6dBm of attenuation to get to that speed.

Cellular Insights said the difference is most noticeable in very weak signal conditions, in which the iPhone X with a Qualcomm modem experienced 67 percent faster LTE download speeds on average compared to the Intel model.

At very weak signal strength, below -120dBm, the Qualcomm modem got speeds on average 67 percent faster than the Intel modem. The Intel modem finally died at -129dBm and the Qualcomm modem died at -130dBm, so we didn’t find a lot of difference in when the modems finally gave out.

iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus models with Qualcomm modems also had faster LTE download speeds than their Intel counterparts last year, but Cellular Insights said the gap was narrower between iPhone X models.

PC Magazine speculated that Apple could be artificially crippling the Qualcomm modem to have similar performance as the Intel modem, given the controversy that arose with the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus last year.

Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X16 is a gigabit-class modem that supports 4×4 MIMO, for example, but the functionality is disabled in the iPhone X. The result is that both the Qualcomm and Intel versions of the iPhone X have a peak theoretical download speed of 600 Mbps in most countries.

All in all, what this all means is that customers who want to ensure they receive the absolute highest LTE speeds in areas with weaker signal reception should put some thought into which iPhone model they purchase.

Apple offers the iPhone X, iPhone 8, and iPhone 8 Plus in two models everywhere but Japan. The first is the Qualcomm-based model A1865, which works with CDMA networks like Verizon and Sprint in the United States. The second is the Intel-based A1901, which works with GSM networks like AT&T and T-Mobile.

If you want the best possible LTE performance, purchasing the A1865 model is the best option. For now, this requires ordering the Verizon model if you want an unlocked device in the United States. In many other countries, and in the U.S. soon enough, Apple sells an unlocked SIM-free A1865 model.

Related Roundup: iPhone XTags: Intel, QualcommBuyer’s Guide: iPhone X (Buy Now)
Discuss this article in our forums