Hey all, I’m a bit under the weather today so let’s just jump right in:
- There are some geek holidays happening this weekend; tomorrow is Ada Lovelace’s birthday and Sunday is International Shareware Day.
- Starting next year, the Q&A section of Public Access will change. Instead of featuring interviews with notable names from the tech world, we will instead be featuring Q&A interviews with Public Access members! Stay tuned for more details about how you can qualify and get involved.
- I’m going to keep saying this as many times as it takes: Public Access members, please read and follow the rules that you see on the first landing page. If you have questions about any of them, you can email us, but we do enforce them so learn them, love them, live them.
Stats and numbers from November will go up next week, I promise! Until then, have a good one!
Looking for something to read? Check out:
Daniel Kraft’s first post on Public Access covers the evolution of work in light of current developments in AI, automation and machine learning. Kraft looks towards the future of work — and human involvement in it — predicting the next three trends that we’re likely to see in the progression of human/machine interaction in the workplace and how it could potentially change our relationship to our work.
Meanwhile, M Zahid accepted the topic suggestion “Are you interested in electric vehicles?” and responded by listing eight reasons why anyone should be intrigued by this latest automobile development — but doesn’t neglect to mention a few of the drawbacks that should be considered as well.
Lastly, Widal James gave us a solid overview of the Microsoft Hololens ecosystem complete with details on motion tracking, the CPU powering the technology and the potential for various applications across multiple industries.
Looking for something to write about? Mull over:
This week, Fitbit acquired OG smartwatch company Pebble which resulted in a lot of folks bemoaning the loss of one of their favorite devices in the comments. Engadget’s editors weighed in on their enthusiasm for, experiences with, and objections to the Pebble, and now it’s your turn: How do you feel about the demise of the Pebble?
CSAIL’s latest project is a system that lets you design, build and simulate your own drone with options on propellers, rods, and rotors as well as size, shape and structure. So… What does your dream drone look like? Fly like? What tasks can it perform? Tell us what your dream drone design is.
Super Mario Run is, according to Nathan Ingraham’s demo experience, a genuinely fun mobile game that perfectly ports the Mario experience to a smartphone. It also gets me one step closer to being able to play all my beloved childhood games on my phone (now if I could just get someone working on Tekken….). What classic/console/video game do you want to see moved to a mobile experience?
Apple announced the AirPods during September’s “See You” event with a scheduled launch at the end of October. But late that month, the company delayed shipments without setting a release date in the future. Well, the tech titan’s wireless headphones still haven’t come out and it’s unclear when they’ll finally be ready for the public. For a company that places enormous emphasis on the pageantry of dramatically unveiling and releasing its products to a ravenous public, this is an unusual and humbling letdown.
It’s the first product postponement since the white iPhone 4 back in 2010, which Apple claims was delayed due to manufacturing challenges. But the company has kept mum about why they’re withholding the AirPods from store shelves. It’s likely caused by their added complexity, a source familiar with their development told The Wall Street Journal. Unlike normal wireless headphones, which receive signal over Bluetooth in only one earpiece, both AirPod pieces do. That means Apple’s product must reconcile any delays and sync audio between them, while also addressing what happens if one of the pair’s battery dies or is lost.
Apple’s silence is tough luck for folks hoping to snag a pair for a Christmas gift. But as we noted when the AirPods were first delayed, their iPhone 7-interfacing W1 chip is present in two models of Beats headphones, the Solo3 and Powerbeats 3. Otherwise, Apple’s loss is their competitors’ gain: Wireless headphones finally outsold wired in the first half of 2016. Technically, people are still buying more pairs of wired ones, but Bluetooth headphones’ high prices mean the money has finally tipped into that camp. Just how much Apple lost out by failing to make its $160-per-unit AirPods available this holiday season is anyone’s guess.
Source: The Wall Street Journal
Remember China’s wacky Transit Elevated Bus aka TEB which promised to carry passengers over traffic? Well, we have some bad news for you. China News reported that the 22-meter-long prototype unveiled in early August had been collecting dust in its hangar for well over two months, according to the two old men who were guarding the vacated test site in Qinhuangdao. One of them added that he could no longer contact his employer. A quick look at the project’s still-functioning website is just as worrying, with its latest post dating back to September 15th.
Following China News’ report last week, The Paper reached out to an unnamed senior staffer at TEB Technology Limited and learned that the company has indeed been facing some “significant” financial issues since mid-November, and its sole investor — a Beijing wealth management company called Huayingkailai — refused to provide further funding. In fact, Huayingkailai landed in hot water recently with accusations of illegal fundraising plus fake credit rating. The Paper tried to call the numbers listed on that company’s website but none were answered; I did the same and had no luck, either.
This is bad news for Suzhou-based design firm Autek, who is still owed some 45 million yuan or about $6.5 million, according to The Paper. Song You Zhou, the so-called inventor of the TEB, acknowledged that his company has yet to settle Autek’s invoice, but he defended by claiming that it’s already been paid 60 percent of the outstanding fee instead of just the rumored 20 percent. As for TEB Technology itself, a former employee revealed that its team of over 100 engineers weren’t actually under said company, but were mainly sent in from Autek and two local universities. With a few more employees gone recently, it apparently doesn’t cost TEB Technology much to keep itself barely alive, especially in its current idle state.
The Paper also received confirmation from the district authority that the TEB project’s management and operations teams have already moved out of the city, which leaves us wondering who will be going back to pack things up. After all, even at just 300m long, the test track has become a nuisance for the locals as it takes up half a side of a functioning road, thus forcing cars on one side to squeeze into one of the three lanes on the opposite side.
According to the original agreement between TEB Technology and the district, the company was supposed to have dismantled the temporary test site by August 31st, unless they were to negotiate an extension for the trial period. Song insisted that the site was still being inspected each week, which contradicts the statements from the district authority and the guards there. Similarly, there’s no update regarding the progress of the second test site which is supposed to feature a 3km track in Zhoukou.
No matter how this company spins it, things aren’t looking good for the crazy straddling bus project. Even if it really has secured a new investor from Beijing as claimed by Song, his team has yet to convince us all that this concept works safely over real-life traffic. With such severe financial, technical and reputation issues, the TEB is just as good as dead.
Source: China News, The Paper, Sina Finance, Beijing Youth Daily
President Obama has reportedly opened an investigation into cyber attacks and foreign influence on the recent election, however, according to the Washington Post, a CIA assessment has already pointed the finger. The Post claims a CIA shared its latest report with senators in a briefing last week, telling them it was “clear” that Russia had a goal of electing Donald Trump. This differs from previous reports, where intelligence agencies said interference occurred to undermine US confidence in the election.
So why hasn’t this come out publicly? There are apparently some disagreements among officials over unanswered questions, and the Post says Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told the White House he would consider challenging the Russians to be partisan politics. Meanwhile, it also quotes Rep. Adam B. Schiff saying the Obama administration “has all the tools it needs to respond.”
Update: In response, the Trump team says “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.”
Trump team releases statement on claims of foreign interference in US election: pic.twitter.com/uZQizVoxa6
— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) December 10, 2016
Source: Washington Post
After yesterday’s report by The Information blew away some of the smoke surrounding Magic Leap, its CEO has responded. In a series of tweets over the last day and a blog post, Rony Abovitz still didn’t directly counter the article, or provide technical details on his company’s upcoming product. He did say that its first “PEQ (Product Equivalent) build of our target form factor” has been completed and that it’s about to begin a larger production run.
Believe. 😎 pic.twitter.com/wXZqrL8fZn
— Rony Abovitz (@rabovitz) December 9, 2016
According to The Information, however, as Magic Leap has had trouble developing a wearable version of its fiber scanning display tech, the PEQ is using something else. The company has not said what projection technology is at work, but the report put it as something closer to what we’ve seen already from HoloLens.
In tweets, Abovitz called the company’s first system “small sleek and cool,” comparing it to comically-larger initial test rigs. He also doubled down on that initial video, saying that not only will “everyone – skeptics and friends alike – will be able to try Magic Leap for themselves” but that they will also be able to play the game shown: Dr. Grordbort’s Invaders.
There’s a lot of bluster, but very little fact and no hardware to show so far. Hopefully that changes soon.
To a few of the grumpy mouse tech blogger writers: you too will get to play the real thing when we ship
— Rony Abovitz (@rabovitz) December 9, 2016
For our launch: everyone – skeptics and friends alike – will be able to try Magic Leap for themselves
— Rony Abovitz (@rabovitz) December 9, 2016
Source: Magic Leap blog
Apple has finally launched its long-awaited “single sign-on” feature.
But there are a few things you need to know about it before you can jump right in. For instance, it’s only available in one country right now, and it only works with a handful of cable providers and apps at launch. Confused? Allow us to explain. Here’s everything you need to know about the new single sign-on feature for Apple TV (fourth-generation) and iOS devices, including what it is and how to set it up.
- Apple says these were the best apps and games in 2016
- Apple iCloud Calendar spam: What’s going on and is there a fix?
- Apple iPhone 6 Plus ‘touch disease’ flaw: Here’s how to get it fixed
What is Apple single sign-on?
The days of having to enter your cable account login details into every individual TV-streaming app on your Apple TV, iPhone, and iPad are numbered. It just depends on where you live and your cable provider. On 6 December 2016, after a couple months of teasing, Apple rolled out its single sign-on feature, which allows you to enter your cable account’s username and password just once and then automatically be signed into all the other apps on your device that also require those login credentials for viewing.
Here’s Apple’s support page that explains the feature.
Which providers support Apple single sign-on?
The following cable providers and subscription-based services in the US support Apple single sign-on (so, if you’re a customer of one these, Apple will accept your login credentials when you set up single sign-on):
- CenturyLink Prism (part of CenturyLink’s fiber optic arm)
- DirecTV (satellite TV provider owned by AT&T)
- Dish Network (satellite TV provider)
- GTA (cable provider only available in Guam)
- GVTC (broadband provider only available in Texas)
- Hawaiian Telcom (provider only available in Hawaii)
- Hotwire (fiber optic cable TV provider)
- MetroCast (provider only available in nine states)
- Sling TV (digital subscription service for cord-cutters)
Which apps support Apple single sign-on?
With Apple single sign-on, you should only need to enter your login credentials for your cable provider once, as apps supporting the feature will then have automatic access to those credentials, eliminating the need for you to manually sign in again on every single app. Now, just because your cable provider supports Apple single sign-on doesn’t mean all your apps and streaming services will automatically log in for you.
Apps need to add support for the feature, at which point they’ll then require you to update them. Also, supported apps might differ between your Apple TV (fourth-gen) and iOS device, and also based on which TV provider you use. Yeah. Not exactly simple, right? Sill, here’s a list of supported apps that currently offer Apple single sign-on (on certain devices anyway).
Note: Apple TV (fourth-generation) runs tvOS.
- ABC (iOS and tvOS)
- A&E (iOS only)
- Bravo Now (tvOS only)
- Disney Channel (iOS and tvOS)
- Disney Junior (iOS and tvOS)
- Disney XD (iOS and tvOS)
- E! Now (tvOS only)
- Freeform (iOS)
- FXNOW (tvOS)
- Hallmark Channel Everywhere (iOS and tvOS)
- History (iOS only)
- Lifetime (iOS only)
- NBC (tvOS only)
- Syfy Now (tvOS only)
- Telemundo Now (tvOS only)
- USA NOW (tvOS only)
- Watch HGTV (iOS and tvOS)
- Watch Food Network (iOS and tvOS)
- Watch Cooking Channel (iOS and tvOS)
- Watch DIY (iOS and tvOS)
- Watch Travel Channel (iOS and tvOS)
You will need to authorise every app you plan to use with single-sign on. Once you’ve setup the feature, that’s as simple as opening the app and selecting OK to authorise the sharing of your subscription data. You’ll only have to do that once. To find even more apps that support single sign on-in the future, go to the Settings app on your Apple TV, then Accounts > TV Provider, and select Find More Apps. That’s it.
How do you enable Apple single sign-on?
Apple TV (fourth-generation)
Go to Settings > Accounts > TV Provider
Choose your TV provider
Sign in with your TV-provider account credentials (username/password)
Make sure that your device is running iOS 10 or later
Go to Settings > TV Provider
choose your TV provider
Sign in with your TV-provider account credentials (username/password)
If you sign in from an iOS device that uses iCloud with the same Apple ID as your other devices, then all those devices will already be signed in to your TV provider. If you’d like to disable Apple single sign-on, all you have to do is open the Settings app, go to Accounts > TV Provider, and select Sign Out. After you sign out, apps will revert to individual authentication options.
Where is Apple single sign-on available?
Apple single sign-on is currently only available in the US.
There’s been a lot of hot air blown across headlines this week about the big cybersecurity plan proposed by the White House’s Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity (PDF).
The plan for a commission to create long-term recommendations on beefing up America’s cybersecurity was first hatched in April. It’s a roadmap that should’ve been plotted many years ago, and is now being re-gifted to the next administration. Which may or may not use it for toilet paper.
The report, which identified six key issues for improving the cybersecurity of the US as a whole, is meaningless without the buy-in of the next administration. “The Commission considers this report a direct memo to the next President,” it states. “It is critical that the next President and his Administration and Congress begin immediately to tackle each one of the issues raised.”
Seeing the report put in motion by the next administration and Congress would be a good thing, if it happens in some form or another. That’s because the report nails it when identifying problems, like securing Internet of Things (IoT) products ASAP. The report finally policy-izes fixing things people like me have been raising the alarm about for years. Namely, that the tech industry rushes things to market before securing them, that organizations no longer have control over people, devices, and data, and that attackers are cashing in on our security fatigue.
Sounds good, right? It also includes a generous amount of attention to consumer rights, even suggesting a security “nutritional label” to help citizens assess the risks of products before they buy. Instead of telling us how many calories are in bran flakes, they want us to look at tech products and see “a rating system of understandable, impartial, third-party assessment that consumers will intuitively trust and understand.”
There is a fair amount of hate in the report for the traditional username/password system everything runs on for login security. This translated into the Commission’s hardcore fanboying of the FIDO Alliance, whose emphasis is on getting rid of the traditional password model in favor of multifactor, biometrics, and items like YubiKey.
I’ll even give the report bonus points for mentioning the Mirai attack in its intro — the concerns presented are up to date. Most reports and the cyber plans of would-be presidents are basically, “internet is dangerous because Target got hacked in 2013.” I’m not joking.
However, most of the news this week omitted the fact that the 100-page report, based on nine months of study, has a few spots of rot under its shine.
The Commission behind the report was comprised of 12 members that included corporate interests like the President and CEO of MasterCard, the corporate VP from Microsoft Research, the Chief Security Officer of Uber (Joe Sullivan, formerly Facebook counsel), and former NSA head General Keith Alexander. Some of you may remember Alexander as the NSA’s “collect it all” guy, and who was forced to admit that the number of terrorist plots foiled by blanket surveillance were wildly and inaccurately overstated.
While I agree with the report’s call to have the private sector and government collaborate on a cyber roadmap, and for that map to espouse citizens’ rights, if their idea of private sector means Uber, there’s a problem. You know, the same Uber that just decided to track its iOS users even when the app is turned off, bypassing the iPhone’s consumer-protecting anti-tracking settings.
The Commission’s twelve “subject matter experts” didn’t come from the sprawling cybersecurity industry itself, who are out there in the trenches, over which this policy will govern. Instead, the Commission tapped NIST, DHS, DoJ, DoD and GSA — to ensure the apple doesn’t fall too far from the tree, we must suppose. I mean, yay NIST. But seriously: where was the actual public sector when these guys were in the pillow fort writing fanfic about making passwords go away?
Some sections seem a little less on the level in terms of fighting the good fight for us little people.
There’s quite a bit about protecting companies from being responsible for anything if they cooperate with the government on information sharing. Because I guess CISA just wasn’t enough. Action item 1.2.3 is about public-private sharing of “risk management practices” (like the actions of an organization’s security team, etc) under the banner of security. This would explicitly protect companies from FOIA, discovery in litigation, use in regulatory enforcement, use as evidence, etc… Hey, maybe that’s one of the recommendations we can thank Uber for.
Another curious section talks about working with the international community on “harmonizing” standards and policies, all in an envelope of securing the digital economy. A sagacious person implementing this might explore how it plays out with repressive regimes who could do a lot of damage under the guise of “incident response.” Like when China and Russia made moves in 2012 to pass an international treaty that would allow UN member states to cut off and potentially intercept communications under vague wordings for cases that, “appear dangerous to the security of the State […] or to public order or decency.”
Ultimately, the report’s results are a range of recommendations as action items that direct the next president to create initiatives, carve out budgets, make Executive Orders, and collaborate extensively with the public sector. It states that within the first 180 days of the next administration, “the President should appoint an Ambassador for Cybersecurity to lead U.S. engagement with the international community on cybersecurity strategies, standards, and practices.”
The report urgently expresses the need for funds to get federal organizations like the old hacked-to-the-gills OPM up to speed with security. “The next President should formally announce his intention to increase investment in modernizing federal IT,” the Commission wrote. Based on a calamitous shortage of cyber-workers, the report urges the next President to “initiate a national cybersecurity workforce program to train 100,000 new cybersecurity practitioners by 2020.”
President Obama has made it crystal clear that it’s up to the next administration to implement this. The new guys would be handling all of its extensive recommendations for collaboration with private sector (joint public-private action). The report has its problems, yet this is likely its biggest one.
But for now, all our qualms with the report are conundrums for a quieter moment. We are on the precipice of chaos. Hucksters are selling mainly cyber solutions but also fear and uncertainty, the attackers crowd the space as they jockey to sell stolen creds for a few bucks, privacy violations heave consumers into apathy, and companies play the blame game now harder than ever. It’s a perfect storm for the selfish to advance their own interests over everyone who doesn’t get a seat at the table.
I guess that’s why the positive parts of this advisory report feel like a bitter punch. It feels slow, and it feels late. Now more than ever it feels like we’re being set up for more apathy, or worse, exploitation. It mostly feels like we should keep working on covering our own cyber-asses.
But if it makes the incoming administration think about cybersecurity a tiny bit, or as more than a tool to advance careers and screw those they disike, then I guess that little bit was worth it.
Between screaming babies, flatulent passengers and that guy ahead of you who insists on leaning all the way back, air travel can be pretty miserable. And that’s before you think about the possibility of someone loudly making a call over WiFi during your flight. The Department of Transportation wants to address that last bit, though.
Soon, it could be a requirement that if said calls are allowed on a flight, you’d know as soon as possible in an effort to find alternate travel options. This would probably mean there would be a notification when you’re booking. “DOT believes that allowing voice calls, without providing adequate notice, would be an unfair and deceptive practice,” the regulating body said in a statement.
“The Department believes that consumers would be unfairly surprised and harmed if they learned only after the purchase of a ticket (or, worse, after boarding the aircraft) that the carrier permits voice calls on its flights.”
According to the Associated Press, a vast majority of the carriers will defer to their customers and flight attendants when it comes to making a decision on this — not government law. And so far, their responses (perhaps unsurprisingly) have been against the idea. The exceptions were American Airlines and JetBlue; the former shoved any questions off on the DOT and the latter didn’t respond to for comment.
Flight attendants are worried that allowing calls could cause fights between passengers who are forced to listen against their will. By extension, this might also endanger the flight crew. The head of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA called anything other than a ban “reckless,” for instance.
There’s a 60 day window for comment on the initiative, so it’s possible that this proposal could die on the vine. If not, and you choose to make a WiFi call from 30,000 feet in the air, remember to watch what you say because the NSA is probably listening. The easiest way around that? Don’t make a call on an airplane. Please.
Via: Associated Press
Source: Department of Transportation
There are many ways Baby So Real can judge you with her animated eyes.
How do you make Cabbage Patch Kids cool again? Make the doll part robot.
Manufacturer Wicked Cool Toys gave the 1980’s phenomenon a high-tech makeover for a new generation. Cabbage Patch Kids Baby So Real is highly interactive, replacing the usual painted-on eyes with LCD screens that display a wide range of emotions. It goes for $100 in the US, which is roughly £80 or AU$135. Although it’s not widely available in the UK or Australia, you might be able to find it online.
It’s quite the talkative baby, continuously requesting things. When baby is hungry, you’ll need to use her special bottle to hit just the right spot in the mouth to register being fed. She’ll then ask for a pat on the back to burp, and sensors on the belly know if you changed the diaper when she needs it.
The animated LCD-screen eyes reveal that Baby So Real is pleased with you. (For now.)
The doll’s cheeks glow red when sick, so you’ll need to use the special interactive spoon to give her medicine until she says she feels better. She’ll also play peek-a-boo and ask for tickles with touch sensors on her feet. The only sweet relief from the demands is when she’s sleepy and shuts her plastic eyelids for a nap.
With Baby So Real, maybe kids who want to play parent will get a taste of how demanding they were as a baby. (At least the doll has removable batteries and an off switch.) The toy industry is on a never-ending quest to make a more realistic baby doll for kids to care for and love. Technology is now helping with that. But high-tech can quickly become high-maintenance.
The doll has a rubber face that’s easy to smudge and attracts dirt — yet washing it with water isn’t exactly easy when you could damage the electronic components. Also, the packaging has repeated warnings about how important it is to have the doll go to sleep on its own before hitting the “off” switch in the back. Otherwise, it cautions, the batteries will drain faster.
Naptime is your only sweet relief from her never-ending demands.
And as with all high-tech toys, moving parts mean more opportunities for things to go wrong. I accidentally dropped the doll and broke it, with its eyelids unable to open and close after the fall. A spokeswoman for Wicked Cool Toys said the company’s customer service team will work to troubleshoot problems for anyone that has a similar experience, since it was designed to withstand the play of a 3-year-old toddler.
Of course, every tech toy these days also comes with a phone app, for Android and iPhone. The app isn’t necessary, but the screen takes the guesswork out of what baby is demanding from you, and turns her needs into a game. The toy doll pairs to the app via Bluetooth. A cartoon version of your doll lives in the app, responding to the actions you give the physical doll. By making your toy happy, you earn points to buy accessories for your virtual baby.
Brace yourself for more interactive dolls next holiday season. Wicked Cool Toys is putting similar LCD-screen eyes into another iconic toy of the ’80s: Teddy Ruxpin. The talkative bear is scheduled to hit stores and melt hearts in 2017.