Wilson X Connected Football review – CNET
The Good The Wilson X football can track throw speed, distance, spin rate and spiral efficiency. It has long battery life, doesn’t have to be charged and can sync wirelessly with Android and iOS.
The Bad Expensive. Included arm sleeve doesn’t fit larger phones like the iPhone 6S or 7 Plus.
The Bottom Line Wilson’s smart football is a good buy for anyone who wants to see throwing stats and have some fun, but it’s double the price of a normal football.
Visit manufacturer site for details.
For the past few weeks I’ve been testing a new kind of football that can measure metrics like throw speed, distance, spin rate and spiral efficiency. It can even detect whether my buddy catches it or not.
The Wilson X Connected Football is like no other football you’ve seen before. This $200 smart football can connect with your smartphone and show throwing stats in real time. There are even a bunch of minigames you can play.
While it costs $100 more than Wilson’s premium NFL ball (a normal football), the Connected Football could make playing catch with friends and family more exciting than ever, if you care about how you throw. It could also, perhaps, be a useful tool for young quarterbacks who want to improve their game.
This smart football has a built-in stat tracker
See full gallery





1 – 5 of 18
Next
Prev
How it works
What makes the the Connected Football special are the built-in accelerometers and Bluetooth sensors. These allow the ball to measure various throwing metrics and send the data to your smartphone. Aside from those sensors, though, this is an ordinary football, and it’s the same weight and size as balls used in the NFL.
Unlike some other smart sports gear we’ve seen, this football never has to be charged. The sensors inside are in a constant sleep mode, and must be woken up each time before you use the ball. You do this by holding the ball vertically for 2 seconds and then turning it 180 degrees. This sleep default helps preserve battery life, which will last for more than 200,000 throws or up to 500 hours of connected usage.
View full gallery Sarah Tew/CNET
Of course, when the battery finally does run out, you will be left with a normal, non-smart football. Footballs don’t last forever, anyway.
The ball also comes with a wrist sleeve for your smartphone, which gives you quick and easy access to plays and stats midgame. It made me feel like a real quarterback, a little bit. Alas, it only comes in one size and doesn’t fit bigger phones like the iPhone 6S Plus or Nexus 6P.
It’s like a video game
The Wilson X football app (Android, iOS) is where all the magic happens. It’s what allows the ball to transform into a video game. Here you can view stats, and see how you match up to others on the global leaderboards. There’s also an avatar that you can customize with your favorite NFL team (I chose the J-E-T-S, Jets, Jets, Jets, naturally). The app is easy to use and I liked how it used colorful graphics for breaking down each stat.

View full gallery Sarah Tew/CNET
There are five game modes to choose from: QB warm up, precision, elimination, game day and final drive. The warm-up and precision modes both measure throw velocity, distance, spin rate and spiral efficiency, but the precision mode will also calculate a WX rating, which is Wilson’s version of ESPN’s QBR score to measure total quarterback performance. Seattle Seahawks quarterback Russell Wilson posted a WX rating of 1,553.5 (out of 1,600) when testing the ball. I barely broke 500.
BLU Pure XR Review
Over the past couple of years there has been a surge of emerging tech companies creating mid to high-end devices, at a lower price than ever before. The competition in the market has resulted in more options and price points for purchase, and nowhere is the competition more evident than at the affordable flagship price point of $299-$399.
- BLU Pure XR announced, near-flagship specs for $299
- BLU Pure XL review
American phone-maker BLU isn’t new to this market, having previously launched the BLU Pure XL at this price point, but what of its latest affordable flagship? The BLU Pure XR looks appealing on paper but has BLU delivered? Join us as we find out in this, our BLU Pure XR review.
Buy the BLU Pure XR now
Design:
In the Pure XR, BLU has done a great job of designing and building a product that is affordable but still looks and feels premium. The BLU Pure XR’s housing is a solid piece of 7000 series aluminum, with chamfered edges and a matte finish. Along the back border of the device you will find the antenna band that’s used for wireless connectivity and unlike other devices, it blends in really well.
Moving to the front of the device you will find a 5.5” display wrapped in Corning Gorilla Glass 3 with a slight curve around the edges. Also, on the face of the phone you can see the speaker grill along the top between the front facing camera and proximity sensors.

Beneath the display is the home button that doubles as a fingerprint scanner and is flanked by the back and multi-tasking capacitive touch buttons. On the bottom of the handset, you’ll find the USB Type-C port, headphone jack, single speaker grill and microphone.
Moving around the rest of the phone and on the left of the BLU Pure XR, you have the SIM and microSD card tray that can be ejected with the included tool. On the right is a volume rocker as well as the power button and BLU’s choice of having the chamfered buttons rest in a recessed trench definitely adds to the allure of the phone.

On the back, the BLU Pure XR sports a 16MP camera and single LED flash in the top left corner, as well as BLU logo in the middle of the phone. The rest of the design is clean and serves to show off the aluminium finish, which looks and feels great in the hand. Despite the slim 7mm profile, there’s no camera bump which means the device won’t rock when placed flat on its back on a table, a condition other phones do find themselves afflicted with.
Like other phones of this size, the BLU Pure XR can be difficult to use one-handed but BLU have reduced the overall footprint as much as possible. In particular, the slim design coupled with a large display (and a wholesome profile at 75mm wide and 154mm tall) make the Pure XR an excellent device for media consumption and two-handed use.

Of course, BLU isn’t the only phone maker in this market and the Pure XR design seems to be on par with the likes of OnePlus 3 and ZTE Axon 7. It’s not the most inspiring but it’s definitely stylish for the price tag and when you use this phone, you get the feeling that it was worth the money you paid for it.
Display:

As a media consumption device, the BLU Pure XR definitely delivers on the display front, with the 5.5-inch Super AMOLED HD display offering 1080p resolution, which results in a pixel density of 401 pixels per inch. The display may not quite be on par with Quad HD panel – although this is IPS and the handset costs more – but it’s more than acceptable for the Pure XR.
As we’ve seen from other Super AMOLED panels, the display offers good color reproduction and great viewing angles. When watching movies or reading text, the screen offers vibrant colors, deep inky blacks and a surprisingly high max brightness, which means it’s comfortable to use, even in direct sunlight. Overall, the screen is definitely pleasant to use and on par with anything else available at this price point.
Performance:

In the past, BLU has traditionally been one of the few OEMs to bring MediaTek powered smartphones to the US, even though almost all companies opted to use Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chipset. The BLU Pure XR is no different, arriving with MediaTek’s Helio P10 processor in tow backed by 4GB of RAM, 64GB of storage and a Mali-T860MP2 GPU.
The 64-bit Helio P10 features four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.9GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.0GHz, arranged in a big.LITTLE formation. The clock speeds of the Helio P10 do seem lower than other chipsets but nonetheless, in actual performance, there’s very little lag. During general use and when gaming, there were no noticeable performance issues to note.


How does it stack up in the benchmarks however? Well the results are definitely less than impressive, as an AnTuTu score of 50789 is considerably lower than the Snapdragon-backed OnePlus 3, which scores 140288 but it is on par with other Helio P10 devices, which average a score of around 51000.


Moving onto GeekBench 3 and the BLU Pure XR scores 839 in the single-core test and 3290 in the multi-core test, which is definitely not the best score but more than acceptable. By way of comparison, last year’s Snapdragon 808-backed Nexus 5X achieves a multi-core score of 3538 while the Moto G4 Plus – which costs $249 and is powered by a Snapdragon 617 processor – scores 3150.
Overall, there’s no noticeable lag or lack of fluidity when using the phone for general purpose and when gaming there weren’t any glaring issues that compromised the experience. Game load times were a bit longer than we’d have liked, but when the game gets going there aren’t any noticeable issues. The performance scores might not be the highest but the actual experience is smooth and polished.
Hardware:

On the hardware front, the BLU Pure XR comes with 64GB of internal storage and offers micro SD expansion up to an additional 64GB. The storage is certainly higher than more smartphones and the expansion means there should be enough storage for most users, although power users who need over 128GB of storage might want to look elsewhere.
Along the bottom the Pure XR does feature a single speaker, which produces loud audio while preserving clarity without distortion. The only downside to the speaker is its placement, as when holding in your hand, it was surprisingly easy to cover the speaker which results in muffled sounds. Of course, front facing stereo speakers would have solved this problem but you can’t have everything so if you plan on watching videos, we would recommend getting a stand or using headphones.



The BLU Pure XR is powered by a 3,00mAh battery, which provides good battery life. During our testing, the battery delivered around 4 hours of screen on time and we were comfortably able to get a full day of usage out of single charge. For reference, this includes streaming on YouTube, playing games, general communicating and web browsing. For the times when it is running low, the included quick charger makes it quick and simple to get fully charged up again.
Camera:

One of the most important parts of a smartphone is the camera and the BLU Pure XR seems to tick this box with a 16MP sensor of f/1.8 aperture, phase detection and laser autofocus and a single LED flash. There’s not a lot of other noteworthy camera features but on paper, the camera should be good enough to get the job done.
Like most smartphones, the Pure XR can take really sharp images in perfect conditions but it’s rare to actually be shooting in ideal conditions so you need a smartphone that can adapt and still capture an excellent picture. Sadly, this isn’t the case with the BLU Pure XR, which does seem to struggle when conditions aren’t ideal.




One of the issues is with HDR as using the feature outdoors results in highlights that were often over exposed and blown out, while in low light, using HDR results in discoloration in the shadows and an increase in overall noise. A key use-case for HDR is to prevent blow outs within photos but the Pure XR definitely fails to deliver and we wouldn’t recommend using the feature unless absolutely necessary.


In low light, pictures don’t seem to offer as much detail as with other phones and while there’s both phase detection and laser autofocus on the Pure XR, they don’t appear to be too effective at preventing noise. Furthermore, in general use, we found that the Pure XR doesn’t focus properly when manually setting the focus in the viewfinder: the handset doesn’t seem to respond to the selected focal point and resulting images are focused on the centre of the frame, with the edges blurred out.
BLU Pure XR Review Camera samples
On the video front, the BLU Pure XR is capable of shooting Full HD 1080p video at 30 frames per second and like photos, the results can vary significantly. For instance, the Pure XR can take decent video in good lighting (just like the camera) but when transitioning from dark to highlighted areas, the camera noticeably shifts ISO, adjusts exposure and isn’t able to handle any lens flare caused by direct sunlight. The lack of any form of stabilisation also shows as video footage can be shaky and generally, we wouldn’t recommend relying on the Pure XR camera for videos or photos.
Software:

Out of the box, the BLU Pure XR runs the Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS with BLU’s own custom skin on top and given BLU’s track record, we’re not holding out for an upgrade to Android 7.0 Nougat any time soon.
The interface does move away from conventional Android by omitting the app drawer and moving system toggles to a swipe up from the bottom, in a similar way to iOS 10 on the iPhone 7. If you’re accustomed to the traditional Android experience, you’ll find this takes some getting used to but I did find that the it feels more intuitive to have the toggles at the bottom rather than the top, especially as it helps with overall one-handed experience.

One of the selling points of the BLU Pure XR is that it comes with a pressure sensitive offering called 3D Touch, which is similar to the Force Touch feature on the Apple iPhone. Essentially, the screen can register the amount of pressure you apply which gives you additional functionality like being able to preview content, jump straight to taking a selfie and compose a text message when applying additional pressure to the home screen. It works surprisingly well and seems to be on par, at least performance wise, with the feature found on Apple’s flagships.
The Pure XR also comes with a variety of smart gestures including being able to double tap the phone to wake it, raising the phone to your ear to answer a call and flipping the phone over to silence an alarm. These features aren’t new but work well enough and help to make the experience a little better. Overall there’s not a lot of bloatware – which definitely aids the slick performance – and while the skin will definitely require acclimatising to, it’s not the most gharish out there. If you’re willing to get used to the different experience, it definitely gets the job done and you can always install an Android launcher for an alternative experience.
Specifications:
| Display | 5.5inch Super AMOLED curved display 1080p resolution, 401 ppi Corning Gorilla Glass, 3D Touch sensitive panel |
| Processor | 1.9GHz octa-core MediaTek Helio P10 Mali-T860MP2 GPU |
| RAM | 4GB |
| Storage | 64GB expandable via microSD up to 64 GB (uses second SIM slot) |
| Camera | 16 MP rear camera, f/1.8 aperture, PDAF, Laser Autofocus, LED flash 8 MP front-facing camera |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n Bluetooth 4.0, A2DP GPS + GLONASS USB Type-C Dual SIM Card |
| Battery | 3,000 mAh Quick Charging |
| Software | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| Dimensions | 154.3 x 74.9 x 7 mm 147.2 grams |
Gallery
Final thoughts

When considering a phone, price is often one of the biggest factors and the BLU Pure XR comes in at only $300 giving wallet-conscious customers a great offering. However, the poor camera and the questionable future upgrade plans might mean handsets such as the LG Nexus 5X and OnePlus 3 could be great alternatives if these are important concerns to you.
- BLU Pure XR announced, near-flagship specs for $299
- BLU Pure XL review
All in all, this phone definitely delivers a great experience that is reliable and slick and considering the price, it’s definitely a worthy contender if you’re shopping on a budget. What do you think of the BLU Pure XR and would you buy one? If not, what would you buy instead? Let us know your views in the comments below!
Buy the BLU Pure XR now
Apple’s $120M patent victory over Samsung reinstated on appeal
Once again, the tables have turned in the Apple vs. Samsung patent saga. Back in February, a US circuit appeals court overturned the $120 million victory awarded to Apple way back in 2014, claiming that Samsung didn’t infringe on patents for swipe to unlock and an quick-link feature that turns information like addresses or phone numbers into links. But here we are six months later, with a different federal appeals court reinstating the case’s first decision awarding $120 million to Apple.
In an 8-3 decision, the new judicial panel found that the three judges presiding over the first appeal acted incorrectly by taking information into account that wasn’t in the first trial and ruling on issues never brought up on appeal, according to The Verge. But by reinstating the case’s first ruling, they also maintained that Apple pay Samsung $158,400 in damages for infringing on a video and gallery patent.
Developing…
Via: The Verge
Source: Bloomberg
Google Duo is pushing Hangouts off Android
It looks like Hangouts is being sent to the big office suite in the sky. According to Android Police, starting on December 1st, phone makers like Samsung and HTC will no longer be required to add Hangouts to their handsets. Instead, Duo will be the mandatory video-calling app on Google-powered devices.
This isn’t that surprising, Google has said that it will focus on making Hangouts more of a business app and after December 1st, users will be able to download it from the Play Store.
Meanwhile cross-platform Duo is geared more towards the masses with a simpler interface and “fun” features like Knock Knock which shares a video of a person before a call is answered.
But don’t be surprised if come December you see both apps on your new Android phone. Just because Hangouts is no longer a mandatory part of the default OS bundle doesn’t mean phone makers will pull it right away.
Via: The Verge
Source: Android Police
The FBI wants to crack another iPhone after Minnesota stabbings
The FBI and Apple might be headed for another fight over the case of a locked phone. Last night, FBI special agent Rich Thorton confirmed that the agency is trying to crack an iPhone belonging to Dahir Adan, a 20-year-old Somali immigrant who stabbed 10 people in a Minnesota mall last month. Per Wired, Thorton said the bureau was already sifting through some “780 gigabytes of data from multiple computers and other electronic devices,” but unlocking Adan’s phone could shed valuable light on why he did what he did and help figure out who (if anyone) helped him on his path.
But cracking the phone isn’t a matter of course — the FBI’s currently weighing its “legal and technical” options to get inside the unspecified device. A lot of the FBI’s work here depends on what kind of iPhone they recovered, too — the introduction of iOS 8 two years ago meant not even Apple could decrypt the contents of a locked device running that software.
“Unlike our competitors, Apple cannot bypass your passcode and therefore cannot access this data,” the company wrote in 2014, referring to photos, messages, contacts and more. “So it’s not technically feasible for us to respond to government warrants for the extraction of this data from devices in their possession running iOS 8.”
Still, that didn’t stop the FBI cracking from iPhone 5c owned by Rizwan Farook, one of the San Bernardino shooters who killed 14 people in late 2015. The road to that crack was a winding one — the FBI originally pushed Apple for support to unlock the iOS 9-powered device, and got court orders compelling the company to assist. Apple resisted, but the FBI ultimately found a way to crack Farook’s iPhone without Apple’s assistance, a move that apparently cost the bureau a tidy sum. At the time, FBI director James Comey said he hadn’t decided if the bureau would reveal that crucial backdoor to Apple out of concerns it would be closed.
While the FBI might still have that particular ace up its sleeve, the process of sifting through Adan’s data might be way more difficult. Farook’s iPhone 5c lacked the secure enclave that was baked into newer models with the A7 chipset and beyond. It’s unclear at this point how much progress the FBI has made — only time will tell if it’ll try to force Apple to help somehow, or how Apple will response if the government comes knocking.
Source: Wired
GoPro’s Hero5 Black and Session bring overdue improvements
Recently, GoPro unveiled an entirely new product lineup. Not just the new Hero5 Black ($399) and Hero5 Session ($299), but also the Karma drone, a surprise handheld gimbal — known as the Karma Grip — and a brand new cloud service called GoPro Plus. While it’s going to be another week or so before we can get our hands on the Karma drone, I had a chance to spend some time with the new flagship Hero5 Black and its sidekick, the Hero5 Session. Both come with some exciting, long awaited new features, which I’ll lay out in detail below. With many of the upgrades addressing common pain points, it’s clear that this year, GoPro was mainly focused on polishing the user experience.
Until the Hero5, pretty much every new GoPro camera was defined by an increase in resolution. The first Hero HD was 1080p, the Hero2 added bumped photos from 5 to 11 megapixels, and so on until the Hero4, which ushered in 4K at 30 frames per second. The Hero5 Session gets an upgrade this time around, also joining the 30fps/4K club (the original Session maxed at 1440p). But with the Hero5 you won’t see any upgrades of that sort.
In particular, there’s no 4K/60fps shooting mode, as some might have hoped for. In fact, the Hero5 Black’s sensor is the same one found in the Hero4 Black. That’s not a bad thing, per se — you can still record in 4K, with additional options for 2.7K/60fps, 1080p at up to 120fps, and super slow-mo 720p at 240fps (plus all the quirky formats like 1440 that GoPro users will be familiar with).
That doesn’t mean there isn’t anything new here. In fact, the Hero5 and Hero5 Session come with a bevy of updates that make the cameras much more useful. Many of the new features come to both the Session and the Hero5 Black, though the flagship Hero5 gets a few extra tricks to keep its position at the top.
New for Hero5 Black
Waterproof design
Perhaps the most obvious change with the Hero5 Black is that it’s waterproof without a housing (the original Session and therefore new Hero5 Session already were). This means you won’t need a separate case to protect it. The upsides are obvious: Though the naked camera is a smidge bigger than the Hero4 Black (a millimeter or so each side), it’s considerably smaller than the Hero4 encased in its housing (which is how you most often see it). The result is that the Hero5 Black is much more pocket friendly, and you won’t need to pry open the case just to charge it or access the memory card.
The native waterproofing “only” works to a depth of 33 feet/10 meters, but that should be good enough for the vast majority of people. If you like, you can still buy a case for added protection up to 196 feet/60 meters. I took the Hero5 Black for several prolonged dips in the Mediterranean, and it’s much nicer to swim with the smaller camera. The rear LCD (also new) was still usable, though at times it took a few attempts to get my taps to register — something most phone owners can relate to.

Another added benefit is that without a case, the camera’s microphones record better audio both in the water or on land. The classic “rattle” you hear on GoPro many water-based videos isn’t yet a thing of the past, but the setup here is much less distracting.
There is a downside to the new design, however: The Hero5 won’t fit many accessories such as drone/handheld stabilizers that were specifically designed for the Hero3 and 4. Ditto for any accessory that uses the rear connector, since the Hero5 no longer has one (now everything goes through either the USB-C or HDMI ports on the side). I tried jury-rigging the Hero5 into a Feiyu-Tech handheld stabilizer (pro-tip: use a hairband to hold it in place) and it worked pretty well. It’s not ideal, but it might ease the transition for those with a sizable GoPro accessory kit.
The benefits of not needing a case will likely outweigh the downsides for most people — though of course if you’re invested in certain accessories, you’ll need to consider if the Hero5’s other new features are enough to sweeten the deal.
GPS
Rugged cameras and GPS go together like jam and peanut butter. Not if you owned a GoPro, though. This seemingly obvious feature has been conspicuously absent from the Hero lineup — until now. GoPro’s still not going all in, though. While the Hero5 Black does have a GPS sensor, it doesn’t do much right now other than tag your videos and photos with the location where you shot them. If you were hoping for Garmin-style data overlays showing your speed, height, location, et cetera, you’ll have to wait a bit longer. Those feature are coming, at least: GoPro recently scooped up Dashware, a company dedicated to exactly that kind of thing, so it’s only a matter of updating the software, a GoPro rep told me. Besides, and GoPro’s not shy about adding features after the fact.
Touchscreen and user interface
The Hero4 Silver was the first GoPro with a touchscreen. That single feature made it our top pick for most people, besting the screen-less (but more advanced) Hero4 Black. This time around there is no Hero5 Silver; GoPro just added a touchscreen to the Black and made the Hero5 Session the step-down model. The Hero5’s display is slightly larger than that the one on the Hero4 Silver, thanks in part to the removal of the bus port on the back. As I found too, it’s clearly visible even in direct sunlight.
Perhaps the bigger story, though, is the user interface, which feels more more simple compared to the Hero4. Access different menus (e.g., gallery, settings, camera modes) by swiping from one of the four of the edges, where’ll you then find related submenus. You might encounter a small learning curve if you’re familiar with the old UI, but I find it’s faster and easier to use once you get the hang of it.
Some of the submenus require you to scroll or swipe through options, much like on your phone. At times, the menu wasn’t always as responsive as I’d hoped, often switching back to the previous selection or registering a swipe as a tap and choosing a menu option by mistake. This didn’t happen every time — it seemed to occur more in humid weather or when my hands were wet — but it was very annoying when it did happen. When it works, though, navigating options and viewing menus is an improved experience. It’s also great that the flagship camera now has the touchscreen it deserves (remember, the Hero4 Black didn’t have one, but the Silver version did).
Advance image capture modes


Just weeks before the Hero5 launch, GoPro updated the Hero4’s firmware adding manual white balance, ISO and shutter settings. The humble action camera might be about living in the moment, but plenty of photographers like to get their hands dirty with manual controls. The Hero5 comes with the same manual exposure controls plus — drumroll, please — support for RAW image files. This is great news for those who want to develop their own digital images. It’s also an advanced feature that will keep GoPro in favor with professionals.
The slider above shows an automatically generated image by the camera (left) and a self-developed one from a RAW file (right). You can make similar corrections in using a photo editor, but the RAW file means you can develop several different versions while keeping the original source info intact.
Unlike some formats, the RAW files on the GoPro won’t eat into your memory card. In fact, often the “.GPR” file (compatible with Adobe Light Room and Camera Raw) is smaller in size compared to the accompanying .JPG (about 3.6MB compared to an average of 4.3MB for a 12-megapixel shot).
If, on the other hand, you do want a little help with your exposure, the Hero5 Black comes with a so-called WDR mode. It’s similar to the HDR function found on many other cameras, just with GoPro calling it “wide” dynamic range, instead of high. If you’re taking photos looking into the sun, or where there’s a great variation of light levels, WDR mode can help you get a more balanced exposure.
In my experience, WDR mode has a modest effect, usually adding some brightness to shaded areas in the foreground, or around the area of focus. Usually this is a welcome change, but depending on the general exposure and light conditions, it can emphasize parts of the image that are grainy or not in focus. In the example below the WDR image is on the right. As you move the slider, you can see that the bushes in the center looks more fuzzy, while the grass beneath and in front appears sharper.
Given the flexibility of RAW files, this might be a better option for those with time to edit after the fact, but WDR is a handy option if you’re in a hurry. Keep in mind, though, that you can only use one mode at a time, so if your memory card and schedule allow, go with RAW.


Battery
Not so much of a new feature, but the battery inside the Hero5 Black is different than the one used in the Hero4 and Hero3. This too is bad news if you’ve built up a collection, as the ability to interchange them was always something of a bonus, especially given how easy it is to burn through one. Worse, GoPro tells me that the batteries in the Hero5 have a chip on them that only allows official cells to work. Of course, the company line is that this ensures the best user experience with only approved batteries working, but that pretty much wipes out the cottage industry of third-party (and usually cheaper) batteries that many people like to stock up on.
As for battery life, in my tests it managed just over two hours of constant recording at 1080p/30fps without GPS or any of the other energy-draining modes. Incidentally, this is almost exactly the amount of time it’ll take to fill up a 32GB SD card. The Hero5 Session faired worse, clocking in between an hour and a half and an hour and 45 minutes.
New for both cameras
Unsurprisingly, the pricier Hero5 Black got the lion’s share of new tricks, but there are some decent upgrades that apply to both cameras, including some features GoPro users have been demanding. The addition of these to the cheaper Hero5 Session make the smaller camera a tempting proposition. If you can live without the LCD and some of the advanced image modes, but still want 4K (and the features below), the $300 Hero5 Session is definitely worth considering.
Voice control
“GoPro start recording.” Expect to hear that a lot this winter on the slopes. Both new cameras respond to a slew of voice commands that let you start and stop recording, take photo bursts, set a highlight tag, shoot pictures, change modes and switch the camera off. This is great for when you have the camera mounted just out of reach (selfies!), or when pressing the button would ruin the moment like jumping off a cliff (or small diving board, in my case).
Voice commands are available in seven languages: English (US and UK), French, Italian, German, Spanish, Chinese and Japanese. It works well — once you stop being self-conscious about speaking to your camera. Often I found myself using voice commands even when I didn’t strictly need to; it was easier to say “GoPro take photo” than navigate the menus, change modes and press the shutter. Be warned that if there’s a lot of wind or background noise, the camera often won’t hear you and you’ll miss your shot. Or, at the very least, you’ll feel a bit silly having to say the command again.
There’s also a secondary benefit/downside, which will depend on whether you have idiot friends or multiple GoPros: The Hero5 literally responds to anyone’s voice. So, on the plus side, if you have a few cameras rigged up, you can easily trigger them all at once. On the down side, so can anyone else within speaking range. Pranksters can easily say “GoPro, stop recording” to ruin your moment, or of course by accident. To counter this, GoPro says future versions will learn your voice similar to Siri, but for now it’s open season. The cameras come with a list of commands, but there are a few easter eggs not included on the list that are actually genuinely useful (hint: they are mostly things people say after landing a trick or doing something exciting).
Stabilization
This is another biggie: Both Hero5 cameras finally have built-in stabilization. There are some caveats, though. It’s not full optical image stabilization (OIS) like what Sony’s Action Cam has. Instead it’s electronic stabilization (EIS), which means the camera is using software to stabilize the image. Typically, OIS is the preferred method, as this steadies the image when it enters the camera. EIS trims a little bit of the image around the edges, and uses that as a buffer to digitally create a sense of stability.
The good news is that it works well. In early side-by-side testing, while walking with two cameras side by side (one with EIS, one without), the resulting image is clearly less jittery and prone to any sort of “jelly” effect — a common occurrence in video shot with a handheld grip. As we noted in our initial hands-on, there is some noticeable distortion around the edge of the image, as the center point tends to remain fixed while the software adjusts the rest on the fly. Side note: When activated, this feature will eat into your battery life.
The addition of EIS is going to be well received, but stabilization is actually a huge part of Karma too. That drone features its own mechanical stabilizer, which GoPro designed to be removable so it can be converted into a handheld gimbal as well. In fact, stabilization is so vital to the Hero5 with Karma, that we plan to give this feature a much more through test in our Karma review. For now, though, suffice to say that the in-camera EIS will smooth out your basic footage, with the trade-off being a dent in battery life and some light distortion at the edges.
A video posted by James Trew (@thatstrew) on Oct 4, 2016 at 7:57am PDT
Linear mode


GoPro is pretty much synonymous with the fish-eye lens at this point. It works well for a lot of action sports, but for casual videos it can be a distraction. As GoPro cameras find their way into the pockets of those just looking for a versatile, rugged shooter, the constant fish-eye has become a bugbear for many. You could always remove it via desktop software, or reduce it on the camera by shooting in a medium field of view, but both of those options felt like a compromise. Now, there’s Linear mode.
As you may have guessed, Linear mode removes the curved effect of the fish-eye lens, resulting in nice, straight lines — whether it’s the horizon, or a lamp post — just as nature intended. Again, it works well. So well, in fact, that it’s tempting to keep it on. But be warned: It’s another feature that’ll tax your battery. It will also slightly crop your image as the “straightened” version will inevitably be longer. Below is another slider with a regular shot and the same picture with Linear mode applied. This is especially pertinent to Karma, as aerial videos are plagued by curved horizons with a fish-eye lens. Not a problem anymore.
Apps and GoPro Plus
GoPro has made a lot of progress with the apps that you use in tandem with your camera, particularly on mobile. The main app for your phone has been rebranded Captur, and although its functionality mostly remains the same, the pairing process with the camera has been greatly improved. I used to generally avoid using the GoPro app unless I really needed to, because it always seemed to not connect properly or forget my camera completely. (I do change phones more than most, to be fair.) The setup process was also laborious, involving connecting to the camera’s WiFi hotspot, doing a little dance and hoping you remembered your password. Not anymore. Just switch the camera on, the app will find it, and basically that’s it. Much, much improved.

This brings me to GoPro Plus, a $5-per-month cloud service that will store 35 hours of video, 62,500 photos or some combination thereof. Again, this is an area where we’re likely to go into more detail when we review Karma, but I was able to try it and get a sense for how it works. The premise is simple: Come back from your day outdoors, plug your GoPro in to charge and it’ll automatically upload your videos and photos to the cloud. These files will then be available in the Captur mobile app or the Quik desktop app where you can use them to create edited videos.
The idea is that editing will be even more convenient. And it does, but my personal workflow is already built around handling memory cards and offline files. So now I find I’m manually importing for the most part, with Plus serving as a handy backup. As with all cloud services, the bottleneck is with the uploading and the downloading on the other end. GoPro tells me that eventually cloud videos will be directly editable from the Quik mobile app (currently only offline videos are available). Once this is the case, Plus will be much more useful.

Cloud services have great potential, but there’s also a downside: the monthly cost. Five dollars isn’t a huge amount, and you get access to a large library of free-to-use music in addition to your storage space. But with Google and others offering a basic service for free, Plus will mostly appeal to hardcore GoPro users — in the beginning, anyway. Not least because it’ll also get you a 20 percent discount on accessories, so it could pay for itself if you’re the spendy type.
If you’re not ready for the cloud just yet, GoPro also introduced a mobile accessory called the “Quik Key,” which is essentially an iOS- or Android-compatible microSD card reader on a key fob that costs $20 for Android phones, or $30 for iOS. Place your memory card in the fob and stick it into your phone, and it’ll open the Quik app automatically, making file transfers incredibly fast and efficient. This is basically GoPro’s mission: to get you making mini movies as easily as possible, and Plus, Quik Key and the Quik app are all designed with this goal in mind. My favorite combination is Quik Key and the mobile app. The first mini edit I made with this combination was simple and suprisingly fun. It makes you want to do more, and the best part is there’s no need to sit hunched over a computer.
Wrap-up
GoPro made its name by making tough, little cameras. Over time, those cameras got more and more capable, but in the race for more features, some of the fundamentals seemed overlooked. With Hero5 Black and Hero5 Session, GoPro has made a big push to rectify these neglected areas. Some of the new features are still under-exploited (GPS, Plus etc.), but for the first time in a while, GoPro looks like it has a clear vision.
The cameras are much simpler to use. Heck, more fun to use too — and getting video and photos out of them is easier than ever. There are still a few areas for improvement, though. I’ll never stop wanting more battery life from a GoPro, and I’d love optical image stabilization, as well as some general image improvements. But all in all, this is a strong response from GoPro to a turbulent 18 months.
Photos by Edgar Alvarez.
Alphabet is working to squash the Zika virus, too
There are a few ways to kill off a pest: eliminate its food supply, or, make sure it can’t effectively procreate. Since the pest in question for this post is mosquitos, the former solution isn’t an option. So, Verily, the life-science division of Alphabet Inc., is addressing the Zika-carrier with a spin on the latter, according to MIT Technology Review.
As is normal with the company’s far-fetched projects, the anti-mosquito experiments have mostly been done under the veil of secrecy. But because one of the tests involves driving vans into neighborhoods and releasing millions of altered male mosquitoes, Verily is pulling the curtain back a little bit.
“People in some parts of the U.S. are asking for help,” Verily’s vice president of engineering Linus Upson told Technology Review. “But if we are going to release mosquitoes in the real world, we need to talk to communities. This isn’t like launching a consumer internet service.”
And he’s right. One method of stopping the diminutive airborne scourge is administering a gene drive, a DNA construct that turns poisonous when passed onto offspring. That’s still in its infancy. Another is infecting the bugs with the bacteria Wolbachia, which, when carried by males, causes females eggs to not be fertilized properly. From the sounds of it, that one is in the embryonic stages as well, but the closest to being tested and accepted by communities. For example, trials from other companies using methods similar to that haven’t caused any public outcry.
The FDA has already approved using genetically modified mosquitoes to combat Zika, so perhaps Verily’s efforts will see the light of day sooner rather than later.
Source: MIT Technology Review
Google Assistant is gender-neutral(ish), but it’s not feminist
In a world occupied by Siri, Cortana and Alexa, Google Assistant is a bit of an anomaly. It’s the first widely used voice assistant to eschew a female name, which the company reportedly did to avoid giving it a personality. The company would rather you imagined yourself talking directly to “Google the search engine” than a go-between. Avoiding a gendered name just happened to be a happy coincidence, it seems.
Despite Google (perhaps unintentionally) shunning obvious sexism in its AI, it still fell into the gender bias trap by giving Assistant a female voice. And that’s a problem, a problem that will require the collective effort of the industry’s powerhouses to fix.
A Google spokesperson told Engadget that the company started with a female voice for Assistant “as it’s something we already had available via the Google voice search technology.” This is the same voice that’s been used in many Android devices for years now, responding to our “OK Google” commands and requests. It’s been extensively fine tuned and worked on over time. A male voice was not available in Android, except via the text-to-speech output settings, which required users to install and switch to new language packs (such as British English). Google’s spokesperson said that the company is “thinking about how to expand beyond a female voice but (has) nothing to share at this time.”

Using a woman’s voice for a bot named “Assistant” is a problem because it ties that subservient role directly to gender. But the thing is, it’s not Google’s fault. It’s not even really the tech industry’s fault. Studies have shown that people prefer female voices for biological and historical reasons. The modern generation has also grown used to them — in-car GPS units and plenty of other audio devices have long used calm-sounding feminine voices to talk to us. It’s so ingrained in our collective subconscious that, even though you can already change Siri’s voice to a male one, the female version is the one that’s become iconic. Can you imagine Siri as a guy? Probably not. But it’s time for a change.
AI makers can start by offering options. It’s not going to be easy to just implement a new voice altogether, but at least Google says it’s thinking about the issue. Amazon and Microsoft still don’t have male options for their assistants and don’t appear to have plans to change that. Apple is the only one right now that lets you pick from a variety of languages, accents and genders for Siri, though it still uses a female name. That should also be changed. It’s not enough to just offer male vocal alternatives without changing the character’s basic identity. Companies should also work towards providing different characters of all genders that users can choose and avoid defaulting to a woman all the time.
Creating options is a good first step, but it’s important for these tech titans to work toward crafting a gender-neutral assistant. Startup Kasisto has proven it’s possible with its androgynous MyKai chatbot, although, like Facebook’s M, it doesn’t have a voice. If these bots are meant to be nothing more than helpers that yield to our every will, it’s better to dehumanize them altogether by not assigning genders than to pretend we have a person (or a feminine non-human) at our beck and call.
Why ‘teleportation’ makes sense in virtual reality
Getting around in virtual reality is a bit tricky right now. Even in room-scale VR, players are restricted by the physical size of their play space. Trying to walk to a point on a digital horizon might cause you to crash into a very real wall — which is why VR games like Robo Recall and Budget Cuts allows players to teleport through the experience, rather than walk. This works surprisingly well, but I could never put my finger on why it worked. At Oculus Connect 3 this week, VR filmmaker Eric Darnell gave me an answer: teleportation in VR works because I grew up watching television.
Darnell has a lot to say about the future of storytelling in virtual reality — as the co-founder of Baobab studios, he’s made VR filmmaking his business. Teleportation, he says, is really just the VR equivalent of the “cuts” we’re used to seeing in TV and film. He credits Bullet Train for pioneering the practice in virtual reality, but seems to think the mechanic was inevitable. “Teleportation in games is like giving the viewer or player the ability to ‘edit’ their experience in film.” It feels somewhat natural because it’s a storytelling tool filmmakers have been using for over a century. Giving that control to the player, however, makes his job a little harder.
The challenge of VR storytelling, Darnell says, is that the filmmaker is forced up to relinquish control over the narrative to their viewer. The audience now has the ability to look away from the action, ignore the cues of the director or, in some cases, simply teleport away from the narrative altogether. The challenge of the VR storyteller is to be a director for the viewer, coaxing them to look, be and do what you want to move the story forward. Darnell thinks his team was able to accomplish that with their first film, Invasion, and hopes to get similar results from their follow up, Asteroids. The first film is available on the Gear VR store now, with the second coming soon.
US catches spies shipping military tech to Russia
We got some good things out of the Cold War, like James Bond and John le Carré, but overall it was a pretty miserable period in history. That’s why it’s so disappointing to see Russia trying to bring us back to those dark with its latest attempt at ham-fisted espionage. The Department of Justice has announced that an American and two Russians have been arrested on suspicion of running a scheme to swipe military technology. According to a statement, the trio posed as a US electronics startup in order to buy integrated circuits for weapons.
The story centers around Alexey Barysheff, a Brooklyn resident, and Russian nationals Dimitrii Karpenko and Alexey Krutilin. Barysheff posed as a technology entrepreneur, setting up front companies BKLN Spectra and UIP Techno. These firms were designed to purchase integrated circuits, digital-to-analog converters — although not the sort you’d expect to find in an audiophiles’ music room. Instead, they were components created by military suppliers for use in satellites, radar and missile guidance systems.
The sale and export of such technology is strictly regulated by the Department of Commerce to prevent it falling into enemy hands. UIP and Spectra arranged deals with vendors using false paperwork and lied about the reasons behind the purchase. Crates of military tech were then sent to Finland before being sent on to Russia in order to conceal the packages’ true destination. The trio will make an initial appearance in court later today with Barysheff in NYC, Karpenko and Krutilin in Denver. If found guilty of illegally exporting controlled technology, they’ll face a jail term of up to 25 years and a fine of $1 million.
Via: Daily Dot
Source: US DoJ



