Microsoft Offering MacBook Owners Up to $650 Trade-In Credit Toward Surface Pro or Surface Book
Shortly after Apple’s October 2016 event, where the company debuted the new 2016 MacBook Pro with Touch Bar, Microsoft launched a new promotion aiming to convert unsatisfied MacBook owners to either the Surface Book or Surface Pro 4.
Today, we are announcing a limited-time “trade up” offer to invite more people to experience Surface. If you have a Mac but want to experience the ultimate laptop with on-screen touch, Surface and Microsoft Store are here for you. Starting today, anyone in the U.S. can trade in their MacBook Pro or MacBook Air at a Microsoft Store or online for up to $650 off a Surface Book or Surface Pro.
Microsoft has also launched a website dedicated to letting users appraise their old MacBooks, listing a total of 117 different configurations of eligible MacBooks, MacBook Airs, and MacBook Pros. The range of eligible models goes back to the 2006 MacBook and MacBook Pros.
To be eligible for credit, the MacBook in question must not have a screen with any cracks or dead pixels. The housing must be intact and free of etchings, asset tags, or cracks. The computer must be able to power on and boot all the way to the desktop and all keyboard keys and functions must properly work. Additionally, Microsoft requires that users trade in the computer’s charger.
The trade-in offer is good at Microsoft Stores in the U.S. and on Microsoft’s website until November 10, 2016. The Surface Pro 4 tablet starts at $899 while the Surface Book starts at $1,499.
Microsoft yesterday announced the new Surface Book with Performance Base. The new hybrid laptop comes with an Intel Core i7 Processor that doubles performance over last year’s model and includes 16 hours of battery life. The new Surface Book goes on sale November 10 and starts at $2,399.
Related Roundup: MacBook Pro
Tags: Microsoft, Surface
Buyer’s Guide: Retina MacBook Pro (Buy Now)
Discuss this article in our forums
Sol Republic Amps Air Release Date, Price and Specs – CNET
Add another totally wireless headphone to the growing list of totally wireless headphones.
Sol Republic’s new Amps Air looks similar to other totally wireless earphones out there, such as the Bragi Dash and Samsung IconX, and costs $180. No word yet on UK or Australian pricing, but we’ll give it to you as soon as we get it. (For reference that converts to about £150 or AU$240, but expect final pricing to be considerably more.)
Like those competing models — and Apple’s delayed AirPods — you get two independent buds that are join together wirelessly to create a stereo pair.

The Amps Air have no wire between the two earbuds.
Sarah Tew/CNET
Design-wise, what distinguishes the Amps Air is that it’s wrapped in a silicone sleeve with tapered grooves. Sol Republic says it “grips the ear like treads on a tire for a comfortable yet secure fit and also allows airflow to reduce sweat build up during workouts.” So, yes, the Amps Air is being billed as a wireless sports headphone and it is sweat-resistant.
The buds fit my ears pretty well and also managed to hold a steady connection — both between my phone and the two buds themselves. There’s a little bit of lag in the Bluetooth transmission, so these aren’t going to be much good for watching video, but they’re fine with music and sound decent if you can maintain a tight seal.
If you don’t get a tight seal, you’ll lose a lot of bass with the sound coming across as thin and recessed. I also thought they had some treble push, which can give certain tracks a harsh edge. And the headphone performed only so-so as a headset — some callers said I sounded muffled.

In their charging case, which also can charge your phone.
Sarah Tew/CNET
Like competing models, battery life is mediocre at 3 hours, but you get a portable charging case with a 2,200 mAh battery that recharges the buds more than 15 times. The charging case also doubles as portable charger for your phone.
Each earpiece has a button on its exterior that allows you to pause and play your music, answer calls, and access voice assistants like Siri and Google Voice Search. The buds automatically turn off when you put them in their charging case and turn on when you take them out. You can also just use one bud as a mono headset for your phone. (When you make calls with both of them on, the sound only comes through one bud anyway.)
I like the design of the Amps Air and found that it worked reliably with minimal hiccups, which is an achievement with this type of headphone. I’m not sure it really distinguishes itself that much from the competition, but perhaps its price will come down with time, giving it an edge.
Apple MacBook Pro with Touch Bar (13-inch, 2016) Release Date, Price and Specs – CNET

The MacBook Pro’s new Touch Bar feature.
Apple
Apple really did think different about its new laptops.
The sheer number of big-picture changes to the iconic laptop line made my head spin during an exclusive hands-on preview of Apple’s new MacBook Pro laptops at the company’s Cupertino, California headquarters earlier this week. While Apple kept the MacBook Pro name it’s used since 2006, nearly everything about the new generation of the high end notebook has changed.
More from Apple’s Mac event
- Does the Mac still matter?
- The Mac and iPad aren’t merging. Get over it
- See all our Apple event coverage
And that’s a good thing. Apple’s last major update to the MacBook Pro, its priciest and most powerful computers, was back in 2014. That’s a long time in computer years. Phil Schiller, Apple’s senior vice president of worldwide marketing, and Craig Federighi, senior vice president of software engineering, said the wait had to do with making sure this revamp wasn’t just a “speed bump” with faster chips and memory. They were after a “big, big step forward.”

The new MacBook Pro: How Apple added touch without a touchscreen
Apple’s latest laptops have a particularly neat trick up their sleeves.
by Dan Ackerman
Close
Drag
What we’ve got now is two new 13-inch MacBook Pro models and one new 15-inch model. Schiller and Federighi walked me through the laptops’ striking evolution.
The long-rumored “Magic Toolbar,” an OLED-display strip for context-sensitive touch commands, is real. Apple calls it the Touch Bar, and it’s worth all the hubbub. Just 60 pixels high (and 2,170 pixels wide), the Touch Bar could be a tool with the potential to be the Swiss Army knife of laptop input, changing itself on the fly to work across different apps, imitating a series of touch buttons, control sliders and even jog dials. This is Apple’s answer to the touchscreens found on most Windows laptops.

A closer look at the dynamic Touch Bar.
Apple
“It provides all your system functions that you’re used to up there,” said Schiller, pointing to the Touch Bar. “But in a much more attractive, better, adaptable way.”
So, for example, you can adjust the brightness or the volume just by touching the bar. “It provides all your system functions,” he said. “That alone replaces everything that the function keys were ever being used for anymore, but it does so much more.”
He’s right. I did see it do much more than the old function key row ever did, instantly transforming itself to fit to the task at hand. But before we can talk about that, we need to talk about all the other changes to the MacBook Pro. And that includes the cost.
Apple MacBook Pro swaps outdated function…
See full gallery




1 – 4 of 60
Next
Prev
New look, higher price
Flip open the aluminum lids of these new laptops and almost everything — including the keyboard and touchpad — looks reinvented, too. On the outside, the physical design is just different enough to mark it as a new generation, without radically rewriting the DNA of the MacBook Pro.
These new laptops are thinner and lighter. That’s no surprise, although they don’t come close to competing with the slimmest high-end Windows laptops. The 13-inch model is 14.9 mm thick and weighs 3 pounds (about 1.36 kg), while the 15-inch model is 15.5 mm thick and 4 pounds (1.81 kg). That’s compared to 18 mm for the previous 13- and 15-inch Pros, which were each about a half-pound (0.23 kg) heavier than their replacements.
James Martin/CNET
If you’re looking for the thinnest possible laptop, HP’s Spectre and Acer’s Swift 7, both powered by new seventh-generation “Kaby Lake” Intel Core i7 processors, are both less than 10 mm thick. Left feeling positively massive by comparison is the classic MacBook Air, once the king of the thin laptops, at 17 mm.
Besides the traditional silver, the new MacBook Pros come in space gray, adding a splash of (muted) color to the previously monochromatic Pro. It joins the 12-inch MacBook (as well as the iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch) in giving you at least a little color customization. The space gray model isn’t as striking as the classic black MacBook, but it’s cool to see a bolder color. That’s especially true on the larger 15-inch MacBook Pro, which wears its space gray finish with a subtle sophistication.
Not so cool: The MacBook Pro gets a painful price hike.
Not so cool: The MacBook Pro gets a painful price hike. The 13-inch Pro with a dual-core Intel Core i5, 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage costs $1,799. The 15-inch model, with a quad-core Core i7 (all part of Intel’s sixth-generation of Core i-series chips, also known as “Skylake”) and 16GB/256GB, sells for $2,399. The 15-inch models also include discrete AMD Radeon graphics, just as the larger preceding Pros did. In terms of battery life, expect 10 hours of work time on both sized models. That’s a tiny boost versus the old 15-incher, and exactly the same for the 13. (See the chart at the bottom of the page for UK and Australian pricing.)
For the most part, though, these specs — especially the CPUs — are a welcome update. They finally put the MacBook Pro on par with the best Windows laptops, whereas the previous models were a generation or more behind. (Those aforementioned superslim Windows laptops are powered by even newer seventh-generation “Kaby Lake” Intel processors, but those don’t seem to offer a big performance boost over their predecessors.)
James Martin/CNET
A few other updates help justify the prices. The RAM is now a faster 2,133MHz version, while the built-in solid state storage can transfer data faster, at up to 3.1 gigabytes per second. According to Apple, the displays, while retaining the same Retina resolution, are both brighter and have a wider color range, and consume 30 percent less power. These are specs many users likely won’t notice in everyday use, although faster storage is key for transferring large files (like videos) and a brighter screen is always welcome. Left off from my personal wish list is a full OLED display, a feature just starting to turn up in a handful of high-end Windows laptops.
If that’s too much sticker shock, there’s also an entry-level version of the 13-inch MacBook Pro that keeps the new design and keyboard/touchpad, but drops some of the specs and loses the Touch Bar in favor of a traditional row of function keys. That model starts at $1,499 and is available now. But keep in mind that before today, a 13-inch MacBook Pro could be had for as little as $1,299, so this is a big step up in price no matter which model you choose. I suspect there may be a few shoppers who try and track down the last stock of the previous 13-inch Pro to save some money.
The second screen
Laptops makers who mess with the traditional keyboard-plus-touchpad design are rarely rewarded.
The idea of adding a second screen to a laptop, or another place to touch and tap besides the touchpad, isn’t new. But it rarely works. Previous attempts often included a secondary touch input at the expense of a primary input method. Razer sold a line of big-screen gaming laptops that replaced the traditional touchpad with a touch-sensitive LCD display that could act as a touchpad or as a context-sensitive screen. The clever idea was undone by two key flaws — it moved the touchpad to the far right side of the laptop, and it had limited software support (mostly a handful of PC games).
Acer tried the Iconia 6120, an ambitious full-size laptop that was essentially two 14-inch LCD screens clamshelled together. Both were standard laptop touch displays, but the bottom one could show a large, touch-sensitive on-screen keyboard, as well as media transport controls and other widgets. There was no second version.
James Martin/CNET
More recently, Lenovo released the Yoga Book, a 10-inch hybrid with a vanishing keyboard. Its lower half is a Wacom tablet that can, at the touch of a button, display a backlit keyboard overlay. It’s an impressive engineering feat, but the stylus-based slate mode worked much better than the hard-to-use keyboard.
The Touch Bar in the new MacBook Pro tries to skirt these pitfalls by focusing on the gaps left behind by the keyboard and (much larger) touchpad. It’s an additional tool, rather than a replacement for something more practical. The thing that it does replace, the function key row, is itself a relic.
“Function keys were put into the notebook so you could do terminal emulation. That use has gone away for quite a long time now,” says Phil Schiller, describing how the F-keys on your laptop were originally created for old computers to talk to even older computers. Since then, more consumer-friendly commands have been mapped to these keys, making for an occasionally awkward compromise.
“It’s kind of a crazy thing to take an old, unused technology and map things onto it just so they’re not nonfunctional.”
Phil Schiller
“It’s kind of a crazy thing to take an old, unused technology and map things onto it just so they’re not nonfunctional,” Schiller adds. “We’ve decided to remove them completely, and instead replace it with something built with modern technology that can adapt and do things we need to do with today’s computing needs.”
With its context-sensitive OLED secondary display, Apple abandons the pretext that we need a string of F-labeled keys at all. What we really want is all those other secondary commands, like adjusting the brightness or muting the audio. By default, the Touch Bar displays a command strip view with brightness, volume and other system control functions. When another Apple app is launched, including Photos, Mail or Safari, the command buttons roll up to the far right side of the strip, leaving the rest of the space free for app-specific commands, which can take the form of buttons, sliders or dials.

Apple’s Phil Schiller
James Martin/CNET
The possibilities seem limitless.
During my visit to Apple’s headquarters, I saw some examples demonstrated for me at our exclusive hands-on. These included a jog wheel for rotating photos in Apple’s Photos app, suggested words and corrected spellings in Mail, and a tiny display of open tabs in Safari.
The Messages app naturally gives you a menu of emojis. Other programs, including Adobe’s Photoshop, will support Touch Bar, which seems especially relevant for design and creativity apps. Future support from third-party apps and websites will make or break the Touch Bar. I’m eager to see what it can do when teamed with apps like Netflix or Spotify, which could hypothetically let you fast-forward through a movie or song with the slide of a finger.
Federighi says the Touch Bar will make it easier to find and use features often buried in rarely accessed software submenus. “Some of these apps have a lot of power that is often hidden behind menus and things, that they can surface contextually on the Touch Bar, which is so powerful.”
Of course, ditching that function key row claimed another casualty: the escape key. But the good news is that at least one of the customized Touch Bar designs already had a “soft” escape key right where we still expected it.

The 13- and 15-inch MacBook Pros side-by-side.
Apple
The far right side of the Touch Bar has a small square set aside for a Touch ID input. That’s the same fingerprint technology that’s in current iPhones, and lets you log into the system and make payments via Apple Pay. You can do that already if you have a MacOS MacBook and an iOS 10 iPhone, if the two devices sit close to each other, but in the new MacBook, it’s a self-contained system powered by Apple’s built-in T1 security chip.
As a clever party trick, the new MacBook Pro can also switch user profiles on the fly, just by sensing a fingerprint. Simply place your finger on the sensor, and the other person’s desktop logs out, replaced by yours.
Twice the touch
The touchpad, which still uses Apple’s Force Touch technology, now spans twice the surface area of the previous MacBook Pro’s touchpad. It’s massive — completely dominating the front of the interior. It’s also a bold challenge for other laptops to try and match (though some HP models have been down this path, too).
Like the touchpads in the previous-gen MacBook Pro and 12-inch MacBook — Apple prefers to call them trackpads — this one has four corner sensors under the glass pad, rather than the more traditional top-mounted hinge. That means the pad doesn’t actually click down, but instead gives you a little force feedback kick. It feels a lot like a touchpad click, but lets you, for example, fast-forward a video by applying more finger pressure to the glass. It also takes up less space, so laptop bodies can be thinner. It’s now in every laptop Apple makes, with the exception of the MacBook Air.
James Martin/CNET
With such a large touchpad, how does the system know to reject errant palm hits while you’re typing?
Federighi tells me the palm-rejection software was already pretty finely tuned from the last major MacBook Pro refresh in 2012. “I don’t know if we fundamentally changed our algorithms because we got it pretty solid in the last generation,” he says. “We’ve had to tune it of course. We do all kinds of tuning of these. But our old algorithm does the job.”
Cracking the keyboard code
Sitting above the larger touchpad is a redesigned keyboard. It’s going to be the topic of a lot of discussion.
Anyone familiar with the 12-inch MacBook will have a better idea of what to expect. The keyboard here uses Apple’s butterfly mechanism, which allows for shallower keys and a thinner body. Using a very shallow keyboard made sense in the very thin 12-inch MacBook, but it’ll come as a bit of a shock for Pro users, who are used to the deep, clicky physical feedback of the current MacBooks.
James Martin/CNET
The keyboard on the new MacBook Pro models have the same shallow key travel (an industry term for the distance the key moves downward to register an input) as the version on the 12-inch MacBook. But the new “feel” of the keys and how they register a click gives the keyboard a more substantial feel. In a brief typing test I was struck by how much the keyboard felt like the one on a 12-inch MacBook, and how unlike the current generation of MacBook Pros it felt. You lose that satisfying feeling of your fingers being on big, chunky keys that click down with a satisfying thunk. Instead, typing becomes a quieter, more subtle task. The keys in older MacBooks rise up from the system surface, like tiny platforms. Now, the keys just slightly break the plane of the keyboard tray.
The new keyboard feel will be one of the tallest hurdles for potential buyers to jump. MacBook keyboards are iconic, and for good reason. The biggest complaints I’ve heard from readers about Apple’s 12-inch MacBook since its 2015 release have been about the shallow keyboard and the single USB-C port. Will MacBook buyers give the new keyboard design a shot? I found that the butterfly keyboard in the 12-inch MacBook wasn’t my favorite.
I eventually got used to it after a short adjustment period. Since then, I’ve easily typed over 100,000 words on the 2015 and 2016 MacBooks. But as an all-day, everyday computer keyboard, I’m unconvinced. Check back in a few weeks of heavy use and I’ll offer a more complete opinion.
The port problem
Every time some enterprising computer company takes away a port or connection on a laptop — essentially branding it as a “legacy” port we can do without — there’s a huge outcry from aggrieved users over this loss of flexibility and expandability. Generally speaking, however, the doomsayers are almost always wrong, and the minimalists are right.
Windows laptops in mainstream sizes have mostly dropped the Ethernet jacks and even the optical drives. Before that, a process of natural selection led to a survival-of-the-fittest array of ports, with VGA and DVI connections, parallel and PS/2 ports, and others vanishing at first slowly, then all at once.
The 12-inch MacBook started the trend of dropping nearly everything in favor of USB-C, which can carry Thunderbolt-speed data, connect to power, and through add-on adaptors, support USB sticks, HDMI output, and anything else you’d want to plug into a computer.
James Martin/CNET
In the new MacBook Pro, Apple more than doubles down on the idea of USB-C; it quadruples down. There are now four USB-C ports, two on each side (except for the entry-level 13-inch Pro, which has only two USB-C ports) and nothing else. It’s a bold move for a laptop that often spends a lot of time tethered to your desk, driving external displays or connected to storage drives. As with your iPhone 7, get ready to stock up on some dongles.
Another carryover from the 12-inch MacBook: the beloved MagSafe power adapter is gone. Like the 12-inch MacBook, the new Pros juice up via USB-C, too.
Generally speaking, the doomsayers are almost always wrong, and the minimalists are right.
It’s actually not USB-C or nothing, though. There’s one more port still hanging around the MacBook Pro. The humble headphone jack, recently excised from the iPhone 7, gets a reprieve here. For now.
“We have a lot of Pros who hook up to studio speakers or amplifiers,” says Schiller, “and we absolutely believe wireless is the way to go for headphones. But there are other uses on the desktop configuration with a notebook.”
A decade-long evolution
This major reworking of the MacBook Pro comes as the Pro line hits the 10-year mark. For the past decade, the MacBook family has largely defined the idea of a laptop in the public consciousness. Its silhouette is instantly recognizable across a crowded coffee shop or conference room. There’s a reason almost every portrayal of a laptop in film or TV since the mid-2000s is either a MacBook or a silver-colored prop lookalike. The aluminum unibody, the minimal visual clutter (which I sometimes refer to as Apple’s “strictly enforced minimalism”), the soft-focus beacon of a logo beaming out from the back of the lid. These all chime with the perceived user of the laptop’s owner: young (at least in spirit), creative and, of course, affluent. These aren’t cheap machines.
My 2006 review of the first-generation MacBook Pro highlights much of what’s made the MacBook Pro such a popular laptop over the years. It reads: “Apple’s minimalist school of design is well represented in the MacBook Pro. Opening the lid, you’ll find only a power button, a full-size keyboard, stereo speakers, a sizable touchpad with a single mouse button, and a built-in iSight camera that sits above the display. We’re big fans of the keyboard’s backlighting feature and the two-finger touchpad scroll (run two fingers down the touchpad and it scrolls like a mouse wheel).”
Rereading that sent me down a rabbit hole, to the first review of the black polycarbonate MacBook (an Editor’s Choice winner for 2006) and the very first MacBook Air review from 2008. The latter is the only one of these I consciously recall writing, largely because of the active back-and-forth debates held with my CNET colleagues at the time about the scandalous omission of an optical drive from that system, and its single USB port for connectivity.
All the action at Apple’s Hello Again event
See full gallery




1 – 4 of 47
Next
Prev
Is the MacBook Pro still king of the laptops?
When anyone asks me the loaded question, “What laptop should I buy?” my default answer has been the 13-inch MacBook Pro. It’s as close to a one-size-fits all laptop as anyone has ever produced, and the reason the MacBook Pro has been the first choice for many people, especially creative professionals, for the past 10 years.
Of course, if you need something specifically for playing PC games, if you’re looking to spend less now, rather than making a big multi-year investment, or just want a touchscreen, detachable keyboard or any of a dozen other features that MacBooks lack, then my recommendations fan out to one of the dozens of other worthwhile laptops made by the likes of Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Razer and Samsung.
Of late, some of these PC makers have come remarkably close to hitting the same highs as the MacBook Pro, with high-res displays, powerful processors and even touchpads that are not as far from the mark as they used to be. Dell’s XPS 13 and XPS 15, Acer’s Swift 7, HP’s Spectre and the Lenovo’s ThinkPad X1 Yoga are all worth serious consideration, although none are in danger of replacing the MacBook Pro as my default starting point for laptop buying advice.
James Martin/CNET
So, what’s the new default? My head says the entry-level, 13-inch MacBook Pro is the smartest choice of these. It’s missing the new Touch Bar, but it has almost every other new feature, including the slimmer design, new keyboard and touchpad, and brighter display. Apple intends it to be the new mainstream pick, and what you should look to if you’re chasing the idea of something as portable as a MacBook Air, but with a Retina display.
But my gut says you’ll regret not having the Touch Bar. It’s only in the early stages of its development now, with a handful of partner apps, but it’s the kind of implementation that most second-screen concepts miss — adding to your experience, rather than trying to distract you with gimmicky bells and whistles. That said, even I did a double take when I heard the 15-inch version of the MacBook Pro starts at $2,399. Even $1,799 for the 13-inch with the Touch Bar is a big ask, considering where MacBook Pro prices were beforehand.
Once we’ve had a chance to fully test and review the new MacBook Pro, we’ll be able to better make a buying recommendation. But if you’re interested in one of the Touch Bar models, you have a little time to make a decision. The entry-level 13-inch Pro is available to order now, while the Touch Bar versions aren’t coming until sometime in November.
Apple 2016 MacBook Pro pricing lineup
| $1,499 | £1,449 | AU$2,199 |
| $1,799 | £1,749 | AU$2,699 |
| $1,999 | £1,949 | AU$2,999 |
| $2,399 | £2,349 | AU$3,599 |
| $2,799 | £2,699 | AU$4,249 |
2016 Lexus GS F review – Roadshow
The Good The GS F’s V8 is responsive and sounds magnificent at wide-open-throttle. Automatic transmission is smooth around town, but also delivers dual-clutch-like performance on track. Chassis and suspension tuning yields great grip for hard driving, but still has enough give for daily running.
The Bad Since the GS F doesn’t have a force-induced engine, it’s down on power compared to its German and American competition. Lexus infotainment systems still aren’t able to run Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.
The Bottom Line The Lexus GS F is outgunned in the power department, but it’s still a worthy high-performance sedan offering an attractive mix of punch, handling, looks, luxury and involvement from behind the wheel.
Blitzing GingerMan Raceway’s back straight in the Lexus GS F at 120 mph all day is easy, but braking for the 90-degree right hander at the end gets sketchy after a few laps in a street car. Seven rotations later, I’m still smirking as the V8 howls at wide-open-throttle, and surprisingly the brakes show no signs of fade.
After a few more sessions out, my admiration only increases for the GS F’s excellent handling, responsive and weighty steering, playful nature and fade-resistant Brembo stoppers. This is a Lexus that’s legitimately fun to wheel around a race track, and built to handle the grueling exercise. It doesn’t feel over-engineered and void of personality, which is something I wouldn’t have expected from Lexus, given its history.
Toyota’s luxury division initially rose to prominence with its reputation of producing well-built, smooth and coffin-quiet vehicles. The knock against them were that they lacked drive character, soul and visual flare. Things have changed, though, with the effort put into becoming a serious performance threat to its German and American competition now paying off.

A producer of beautiful noises.
Nick Miotke/Roadshow
The GS F is the second sedan in the Lexus performance lineup to receive the full F makeover, following the first-generation IS F that includes bigger power, extensive chassis revisions, suspension upgrades and more aggressive looks. With it, Lexus aims to give the likes of the BMW M5, Mercedes-AMG E63 and Cadillac CTS-V a run for their money.
Flashbacks on track
The idea of Lexus producing performance vehicles on par with BMW and Mercedes-Benz is something that I’m still getting used to, but the GS F unearths memories from five years ago, when I flogged the LFA supercar around this very same 2.1-mile west Michigan circuit. Prior to piloting that V10 animal, I didn’t think Lexus could produce a sporty driver, period. Now in the GS F, I see some of that LFA magic.
This GS F becomes wildly entertaining on track with Drive Mode Select in Sport S Plus, unlocking all of the V8’s fury, tightening steering and activating the stability control’s Expert mode, which kills traction control and gives you enough rope to pitch through corners sideways. If you get really out of shape, however, the computer still cuts in to save your keister.

A hard-charger around GingerMan Raceway.
Nick Miotke/Roadshow
Most impressive is how the GS F behaves when you stop screwing around and put down clean laps. Sharp turn-in gets the nose quickly darting in whatever direction you tell it, while it hangs on through corners with superhero-like composure. It handles GingerMan’s fast transitions beautifully, and exhibits only a smidge of understeer through the really tight stuff. It feels solid and eager, thanks to upgrades like additional underbody braces, bigger and stickier Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires, torque vectoring rear differential and reworked suspension.
The fixed suspension uses Sachs mono-tube shock absorbers with steel springs, which some may skewer as a cheaper alternative to adaptive suspensions found on the M5, Audi RS 7 and CTS-V. True, the GS F doesn’t have as wide of a damping range, but Lexus’ tune works well for the track and street.
Lexus makes the steering communicative, tricky to do with an electric system. And the torque vectoring diff, which overdrives the outside wheel in a turn, helps in getting the power back on in corners.
Speaking of power, the five-liter V8 punches in at 467 horsepower and 389 pound-feet of torque. Those numbers may sound weak compared to the force-induced nuclear reactors in some of its rivals. Today, the M5 has 560 horsepower, the RS 7 Performance packs 605 ponies and the CTS-V comes with a staggering 640 horses.

The screaming 5-liter V8 packs 467 horsepower.
Nick Miotke/Roadshow
If you’re horsepower drunk and value bench racing with your buddies yammering about specs, then the Lexus isn’t going to be for you. However, the GS F’s engine does have its benefits. Being naturally-aspirated, the V8 features a linear powerband as well as lively throttle response, and it belts out magnificent sounds at full bore.
Google Pixel XL initial review: first 48 hours
The latest and most official Google device is here. We’ve only had it for a few days total and while we are able to draw some conclusions in that time, we definitely wanted to continue putting the Pixel XL through its paces to be sure our thoughts indeed hold weight.
For now, we are bringing you what we think in this initial review of the Google Pixel XL!
Don’t miss:
- Best Android smartphones of October 2016
- Android 7.0 Nougat review: an Android version for Android fans
First, we open up the box. As the new de facto ambassador in the world of Android, it comes as little surprise that an adapter for USB and Lightning cables is included so that transferring data from other Androids or iOS devices is easy – simply connect the original cable to your previous phone and the other end, adapter ready, into the Pixel. The phone takes care of the rest. A USB-A to USB Type-C cable is included, but the plug adapter requires a cable that is fitted with USB Type-C on both ends, which is also in the box.
Google brings their own design sensibilities to the Android world, in a phone that was built from the ground up. The results are, unfortunately, pretty polarizing. Many of you have already sounded off on the design of the Pixel XL, either saying that it has a beautifully simple look or lamenting its almost generic aesthetic.

We are as split about the design as all of you.
We here at Android Authority are about as split as all of you. Personally, I had become rather accustomed to the somewhat barebones style of previous Google devices, considering that it mattered more what the capabilities were underneath the surface. There was a quiet but effective capability to the Nexus line, but each device brought single quirks to the style. The Nexus 6P had its camera ridge and the Nexus 5 had a large piece of glass adorning the camera, for example. For the Pixel line, Google gave their new phone one key differentiating feature – a top third encased in glass. I don’t particularly find it an eyesore, but I rather think of it as a boring alternative to the different quirks we used to get from phones that bore the Google name.

That said, the phone’s look and feel still do their job properly – they make the phone feel really solid and sleek despite a measure of blandness in particularly this Very Silver version. The Quite Black version might be a little easier on the eyes while the North American-only Really Blue edition is, indeed, very different, but doesn’t add much more than a different hue.
A smaller Google Pixel is available with a 5-inch screen but we have the Pixel XL which sports a 5.5-inch screen. Larger upper and lower portions make the phone feel a little taller than it probably needed to be, but if there is plenty going on underneath all that surface area, then it can be excused. Overall, the XL feels plenty hefty and takes the usual amount of hand gymnastics in order to be used in one hand. Despite the glass on the back of the device, most of the backing is made of a smooth metal that unfortunately makes it slide about in the hand a bit too easily.

The sides of the device remind us of the Moto Z Force, which had a pretty aggressive chamfer to add texture to the sides. This was definitely the right choice considering how much the phone can slide around because if the sides were just as smooth, dropping it would probably be much more likely.

We will try our best not to compare the Pixel to the Nexus too much, but we do admit that the sideways Nexus logo is a bit missed. Even with a barebones overall design, that logo was distinctive. This time around, it is simply a large G on the bottom third and the glass upper side, all of which basically make for a phone that does look different, but does it in a somewhat boring fashion.

Google opted for AMOLED touchscreens for the Pixel phones, but the smaller Pixel comes with 1080p resolution. The XL sports Quad HD, and it looks pretty dang incredible. A lot of YouTube videos have been viewed in our first few days with the device, and everything from animated content to daily vlogs look great at resolutions 720p and higher. We also had a good time with games, as colors are rendered with the proper amount of vibrancy. So far, the only gripe I had with this display is that it gets just a little too dim at the lowest brightness setting – then again, this is a common facet of AMOLED displays. On the other hand, the screen looks great even in broad daylight when pumped up to the highest setting.

There is a sense of polish and smoothness that is undeniable.
As one of the first phones to sport the Snapdragon 821, it should come as no surprise that the Google Pixel XL simply flies through its tasks without any issues. Especially considering the streamlined and pure version of Android that the Pixel sports, there is a sense of polish and smoothness that is undeniable. This is not to say that other Android devices lack in the speed department, there just seems to be a great deal of attention given to the transitions and movements among all of the Nougat 7.1 elements.

But even in situations when slowdown should have been experienced, the phone has performed wonderfully – for example, the first boot up and long setup process that included downloading and installing a ton of applications might have made the phone feel a bit warmer, but it didn’t give me the usual slowdown I experience with other phones.
We will be playing more games and performing more tasks for the coming days, but so far the Pixel XL is a good poster child for the Snapdragon 821 and, indeed, for point of using pure Android in the first place.

Hardware is a part of the Pixel phones that might put it at a disadvantage – after all, a Google device tends to not have all of the extra features plenty of Android devices sport.
Hardware is a part of the Pixel phones that might put it at a disadvantage.
That starts off with the lack of expandable storage, which I have already had to contend with in my weekend with the Pixel XL. My unit is a 32GB version, which means that 4K recording is not only stifled, but is a nuisance. Having a plethora of applications and, in particular, games installed takes up a lot of the 29.70GB made available to the user. With MOBIUS Final Fantasy, Final Fantasy 7, and Final Fantasy 9 installed, only about half of the available storage was left for me to do photos and videos with. And at the high quality 4K recording option, the camera constantly reminded me of the less than 15 minutes of recording time I had available to me. Granted, Google Photos on the Pixel allows for the full resolution uploading and saving of all photos and videos, but having to find Wi-Fi to upload and, for that matter, the need to let the app clean up the Camera folder is a step I am still not used to doing.

Sound is a welcome highlight for the Pixel, a phone that is supposed to take voice inputs at any time and play the soothing, if not robotic, voice of Google Assistant. To that end, the bottom mounted speaker (only one, the left one) is one of the best of its kind. It gets plenty loud and yet retains a good amount of body. It is by no means a good bass performer, but especially for evoking the voice of Google Assistant, it does the job incredibly well. For viewing videos or playing games, I did not feel the need to reach for a pair of headphones. Even so, the headphone experience on the Google Pixel is above average. There are no extra options and features in the phone for catering the sound like in the LG V10 or the HTC 10, but the default sound profile is still very enjoyable, with the headphone jack properly driving my pair of Audio Technica ATH-M50x headphones.

Our battery life testing is still ongoing, but I can definitely relay my experience after the last few days. A 3,450 mAh battery unit keeps the Pixel XL going for what can be described as the expected portion of the day, which can be easily tracked with the battery section of the settings. Personally, I really enjoy the way Nougat 7.1 shows the graph and the amount of time that has elapsed since unplugging the phone, even in the quick settings dropdown. With all that said, a day of somewhat aggressive usage that included GPS navigation and plenty of built-in speaker blasting took the phone out in about 16 hours with 4 hours of screen on time.

Which brings me to an interesting change in my battery usage that has only come about due to the Pixel. As I mentioned, the speaker got a lot of play and was a part of the overall battery drain. This is because Google Assistant, the main software addition the Pixel introduces, is so effortlessly useful that I have been talking and listening to this phone more than any that came before it. This is also due to a great microphone that sports noise cancellation and voice recognition that remind me of previous Moto X devices.
See also: Google Assistant: The top features you should know26
Due to one key feature of Google Assistant – the Daily Briefing – I’ve not only gotten used to saying ‘good morning’ upon waking without even touching the phone, but I’ve listened to the Assistant’s built-in podcast player that only plays a curated list of news shows. The last two days saw over an hour of news brief listening in the morning – which actually registers on the battery usage tally.
Before we get deeper into Google Assistant, we have the other marquee feature of the Pixel XL – the camera, which is a 12.3MP main camera with f/2.0 aperture and a front facing unit shooting 8MP. While the cameras of the Pixel phones might look very similar to the Nexus 6P on paper, there are a few key enhancements that we’ve already noticed and thoroughly enjoy.

First of all, the app is the same Google Camera that you may already be used to from the Nexus and the Google Play Store, meaning that it is a simple to use, auto interface without manual controls. Modes include Panorama and Lens Blur, with Slow Motion available at 120fps at 1080p resolution.
HDR is now HDR+, a version of color and contrast enhancement that is technically always on. Though the option will show HDR+ Auto, most pictures show processing of HDR+ when they are accessed in the gallery immediately after shooting. Pictures are already well rendered, but having the HDR+ add that little extra bit will make for pretty consistently pleasing photos. That said, HDR+ does do a good job of adding some extra vibrancy to photos while bringing down the highlights in any picture that has a blown out area like the sun soaked sky. And the best part about the HDR+ is that it has basically no shutter lag – in only a few photos did I notice a small amount of processing after hitting the shutter.

Which brings us to the other main feature of the cameras – video stabilization. The camera of the Pixel XL does not come with optical image stabilization and instead relies on analysis of the gyroscope while recording and software based post-stabilization. One immediate positive feature of this electronic image stabilization is that it is available while recording 4K video, which is not a feature commonly found on current Android phones. However, it is very common for software stabilization to lead to weird warping of a video and the dreaded ‘jello effect’ that Google hopes their version of stabilization will remedy.
So far, video stabilization has been incredible
And so far, it has blown me away. I put it through a few simple tests that included one walking shot and a couple stationary handheld examples. In all cases, the difference is basically night and day – the stabilization does a great job of noticeably making footage smoother, making it seem like the phone was on a gimbal during my walking example. Even more impressive is the lack of the ‘jello effect’ when moving from side to side. For a user like me that likes to vlog, the stabilization makes this already good performing 4K shooter an even more impressive companion to have for pictures and video, even if available space is an issue in this 32GB device.

Overall, the camera has so far been very impressive and we will be doing more testing and comparisons with other Android devices to further consider its capabilities. For now, however, I have been very impressed with the camera and already consider it one of the better automatic shooters.

Which brings us to software, which is the latest version of pure Android in Nougat 7.1. Though the LG V20 was the first phone to come with Android Nougat, the ‘.1’ that the Pixel brings is quite significant and might make it one of the most sought after versions of Android. Unfortunately, it is unclear how much of this version of Android will actually make it to other, non-Google branded devices. And that might be a shame, because 7.1 is a delight to use, mostly due to Google Assistant.

Hold the home button and Google Now on Tap is nowhere to be found – unless you swipe up from the bottom again, that is – because it is replaced with the voice-centric Google Assistant. Talking to an Android device is now as seamless as it has ever been, as everything from questions to search queries to even time-killing can be done with Google speaking right back at you. As already mentioned, this means that certain features like a daily briefing can be enjoyed by just asking the phone to do it. Even better, setting up the voice recognition makes Google Assistant ready no matter where the phone is, as long as it is near enough to hear ‘OK Google.’

The microphone is delightfully sensitive and accurate, while Assistant is really responsive and quick. There is one hiccup, as Assistant doesn’t seem to be opening appropriate apps automatically based on the query anymore like it did during my First Look. Even the quick display of the top search result is still accurate, so a small tap on it is a small trade-off. Plenty of other features are available via Google Assistant and I found myself asking random questions just to see what it can do – I even played an odd game of Mad Libs where the Assistant asked me for all of the different words it needed to construct the ridiculous narrative.

Assistant is already quite robust, but I can only imagine how much more it will grow over the life of the Pixel XL – after all, it is the centerpiece of the new Google ecosystem that incorporates Google Home.
Assistant is already quite robust, but I can only imagine how much more it will grow over the life of the Pixel XL
Otherwise, all of the different elements of Android remain very familiar even with the Pixel Launcher as the interface. The app drawer is still around, thankfully, and is accessed by swiping up on the homescreen. Google Now is still available to the left of the homescreens, while the big ‘G’ at the top gives easy access to a search bar that felt a little obsolete once I got used to using my voice instead. There are a lot of built-in wallpapers that can be used singularly or cycled from a curated list that is updated every day. Personally, I am a fan of the Live Earth wallpaper that rotates with the homescreens and mimics the real life sun, moon, and cloud conditions.

The settings area is a little easier to navigate now in Nougat, and it now has an entirely separate area for on-demand help, though I haven’t used it yet. Multitasking users finally have a Google-made multi-window feature that is accessed by dragging a window in the recent apps screen to the area up top, but this is also something that I have not used extensively because moving in and out of the recent apps screen has been as smooth as ever.

As long as Assistant continues to evolve, the Pixel has a feature that, if it never comes to other Android devices, does a great job of differentiating itself. The usefulness of Assistant predicates on whether or not the user actually takes advantage of it, and so far I think that everyone really should. Try it out with Allo and if you really enjoy Assistant, imagine having that functionality baked into the rest of the experience.

We have definitely drawn a lot of conclusions about the Google Pixel XL so far, and we are going to see if that positivity continues in our testing. A full review of the phone will be done in the coming days, perhaps just after the release of all the pre-order devices on October 20. All versions of the phone are still sold out in the Google Store, which undercuts what many users thought would be the Pixel’s Achilles’ heel – the price. For $649 on the base 32GB Pixel, the Google phones certainly hold a premium price point even if, at first glance, it doesn’t seem to offer nearly as much as the rest of the Android army. This is a very valid argument considering the Google Pixel XL at 32GB is a whole $120 extra.
Read next:
- Google Pixel XL vs Galaxy Note 7
- Google Pixel and Pixel XL vs the competition
So, before scoring the phone on its own merits, we will leave this initial review at this thought: if the rest of Android did not exist and the Google Pixel stood on its own, it would be one of the best phones we’ve ever seen or used. Unfortunately for the Pixel, the rest of Android undoubtedly offers more and for far better prices across the board. But the Pixel damn near perfects the basics where plenty of Android phones inexplicably falter. And for the first outing of the Pixel, Google has so far done a damn good job.
Does the iPad Air have a future at Apple?
During its Fall 2016 event in Cupertino on Thursday, Apple debuted its newest MacBook Pro as well as an overhaul of Final Cut Pro X and an all-in-one video entertainment app simply titled, TV. But surprisingly, there was not a word spoken about iPads.
First, a quick recap: the iPad Air and iPad Mini 2, were both released in 2013. They then both received updates the following year with the release of the Air 2 and the tepidly-received mini 3. But in less than a year, Apple had already moved on to something newer, bigger and more expensive. The iPad Pro 12.9-inch dropped in September 2015, along with the iPad mini 4, and was joined by a retina-enabled 9.7-inch Pro this past March.
That means we haven’t seen a new iPad Air in two years. And while the older models are still receiving OS updates, their A8 processors are decidedly pokey when facing the Pro’s A9x. In fact, benchmark tests indicate that the A9, which is really a desktop chip crammed into a tablet, performs nearly twice as well as the previous version.
So if Thursday’s event is any indication, it would appear that Apple is far more focused on its Pro models than the rest of its products. Just as today’s announcement of three new MacBook Pros — the base model of which, offers similar specs to the existing MacBook Air at a slightly higher price — likely spells the eventual end of the MacBook Air line, Apple’s recent release of the 9.7 and 12.9 inch iPad Pros could be bad news for the older iPads.

Given this timing — release, update within a year, then nothing for the next two — does not bode well for the iPad Air line, especially with the more recent release of the Pros. What’s more, the 9.7-inch iPad Pro offers superior performance in the same form factor as the Air 2 for just $200 more. So why would Apple keep the Air 2 around when it could simply eliminate the model and force consumers to shell out an extra two bills for the Pro? Remember this is a company that recently eliminated the iPhone 7’s headphone jack in favor of selling us $180 wireless AirPods and just today rolled out a series of laptops that can’t connect to any peripheral you already own without an adapter.
In the end, there’s no way to confirm that this is the end of the line for the iPad Air. Apple is notoriously secretive when it comes to upcoming product announcements. There are some unsubstantiated rumors that the next Mini could be announced in the spring of 2017, and maybe the Air will be brought along, but we’ll have to wait for March to find out.
Click here to catch all the latest news from Apple’s “Hello again” event.
Apple Releases $49 Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 Adapter Alongside New MacBook Pro
Alongside the new MacBook Pros, which only include four USB-C ports with Thunderbolt 3 support, Apple has released a Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) to Thunderbolt 2 Adapter.
Priced at $49, the Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 Adapter will allow customers who purchased a new MacBook Pro to connect Thunderbolt 2 accessories like hard drives to one of the Thunderbolt 3 ports in the new MacBook Pro.
Because the adapter is bidirectional, it can also be used to connect Thunderbolt 3 devices to a Mac that’s equipped with a Thunderbolt or Thunderbolt 2 port.
The new Thunderbolt 3 to Thunderbolt 2 Adapter is not yet available in Apple retail stores, but it can be ordered online. Deliveries placed today will ship on November 4 at the earliest using the fastest shipping method.
Discuss this article in our forums
How the MacBook’s new Touch ID fingerprint scanner works – CNET

MacBook gets Touch ID fingerprint scanner
Apple updates the MacBook with its Touch ID fingerprint scanner. Users can also use Apple Pay with the feature.
Close
Drag
Apple added Touch ID to its new MacBook Pros today, bringing its killer security feature to computers for the first time.
This isn’t the first time we’ve seen fingerprint-scanning on a laptop, but its a first for MacBook users and a familiar feature for those who use Touch ID on an iPhone or iPad for unlocking their devices and using Apple Pay.
But, no — you’re not going to bring the new MacBook into stores to make purchases. Here’s what it can — and likely will — do.
Exclusive interview

Does the Mac still matter?
Apple Pay
You can already use Apple Pay in Safari, but your phone is required to complete purchases. When you’re ready to complete a transaction using Apple Pay, your phone lights up and asks you for your fingerprint. Clever. But not streamlined.
With Touch ID embedded into the MacBook, you’ll just tap your finger on the Touch ID sensor (on the far-right side of the Touch Bar) and you’re set. No iPhone, no problem.
Logging in and out
Just like Touch ID unlocks your iPhone or iPad, Touch ID on the MacBook gives you a password-free way to log into your laptop.
Multiple users can register their fingerprints and associate them with their Mac OS accounts. Apple even added an easy way to switch users using Touch ID — no matter which screen you’re on, a scanning of a fingerprint prompts the system to switch users.
This is a developing story. Follow CNET’s Apple live blog and see all of today’s Apple news.
Apple MacBook Pro swaps outdated function…





1 – 5 of 60
Next
Prev
How the MacBook’s Force Touch trackpad works – CNET

Test driving Apple’s Force Touch trackpad
Don’t wait for the 12-inch MacBook, you can get the new Force Touch trackpad in this updated 13-inch Pro model.
by Dan Ackerman
Close
Drag
Apple’s new Macbooks include a wider, more spacious trackpad, giving you more room than ever to use Force Touch.
Force Touch, originally introduced on Apple’s 2015 MacBook and 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro, is like 3D Touch for your Mac. When you push into your trackpad — with force — new options appear. For instance, if you force-touch over an image file, a preview appears.
Apple
How the Force Touch trackpad is different
Current trackpads use what Apple called a “diving board” design, where the top edge of the trackpad near the keyboard is fixed in place, allowing the rest of its surface to be clicked. The Force Touch trackpad, however, features four sensors that let the trackpad be clicked anywhere, including along its top edge.
When editing photos, for example, I sometimes lose track of where I am on the trackpad and have a click denied when attempting to click a spot too close to the top edge. With Force Touch, no longer will I feel the frustration of a denied click.
But, remember: a “click” on a Force Touch keyboard isn’t a true click. What feels like a click is actually haptic feedback based on the amount of pressure you’ve applied to the trackpad.
Why it’s different from a right-click
When the first Macbooks with Force Touch were announced in 2015, it seemed like, maybe, the right-click was being phased out. It’s clear now, however, that’s just not the case.
Here are the primary ways to use Force Touch:
- Force click. This is the closest thing to a right-click, except, other options appear. For instance, you can force-click a link to preview it in Safari.
- Force pressure. The Force Touch trackpad can sense how hard you’re pressing, giving you even more control. For instance, when you’re watching a movie, the pressure of your click determines how fast you fast-forward or rewind. The same function works for zooming in on Maps or adjusting the weight of a drawing tool.
More than one kind of force-touch
Not all clicks are created equal with the Force Touch trackpad. It can tell the difference between a light tap and a deep press, which has allowed Apple to create new Force Touch gestures. You can deep-press on a word when browsing Safari, for example, to call up a Wikipedia entry. You can deep-press an address to bring up its location on a map or preview a file in Finder.
The pressure sensitivity also lets you make small changes in pressure to adjust the speed when fast-forwarding through QuickTime, for example, or zooming in on a map. Apple also showed that the trackpad’s will also make electronic signatures more realistic.
Apple Watch event: The latest from San Francisco…





1 – 5 of 30
Next
Prev
Along with the new sensors, the Force Touch trackpad features a taptic engine that provides tactile feedback, letting you know by feel when you performed certain tasks. Apple gives the example of aligning annotations on a PDF. You’ll get a little pulse when things are lined up just so.
Follow CNET’s Apple live blog and see all of today’s Apple news.



