Skip to content

Archive for

8
Oct

Apple’s $120M patent victory over Samsung reinstated on appeal


Once again, the tables have turned in the Apple vs. Samsung patent saga. Back in February, a US circuit appeals court overturned the $120 million victory awarded to Apple way back in 2014, claiming that Samsung didn’t infringe on patents for swipe to unlock and an quick-link feature that turns information like addresses or phone numbers into links. But here we are six months later, with a different federal appeals court reinstating the case’s first decision awarding $120 million to Apple.

In an 8-3 decision, the new judicial panel found that the three judges presiding over the first appeal acted incorrectly by taking information into account that wasn’t in the first trial and ruling on issues never brought up on appeal, according to The Verge. But by reinstating the case’s first ruling, they also maintained that Apple pay Samsung $158,400 in damages for infringing on a video and gallery patent.

Developing…

Via: The Verge

Source: Bloomberg

8
Oct

Google Duo is pushing Hangouts off Android


It looks like Hangouts is being sent to the big office suite in the sky. According to Android Police, starting on December 1st, phone makers like Samsung and HTC will no longer be required to add Hangouts to their handsets. Instead, Duo will be the mandatory video-calling app on Google-powered devices.

This isn’t that surprising, Google has said that it will focus on making Hangouts more of a business app and after December 1st, users will be able to download it from the Play Store.

Meanwhile cross-platform Duo is geared more towards the masses with a simpler interface and “fun” features like Knock Knock which shares a video of a person before a call is answered.

But don’t be surprised if come December you see both apps on your new Android phone. Just because Hangouts is no longer a mandatory part of the default OS bundle doesn’t mean phone makers will pull it right away.

Via: The Verge

Source: Android Police

8
Oct

The FBI wants to crack another iPhone after Minnesota stabbings


The FBI and Apple might be headed for another fight over the case of a locked phone. Last night, FBI special agent Rich Thorton confirmed that the agency is trying to crack an iPhone belonging to Dahir Adan, a 20-year-old Somali immigrant who stabbed 10 people in a Minnesota mall last month. Per Wired, Thorton said the bureau was already sifting through some “780 gigabytes of data from multiple computers and other electronic devices,” but unlocking Adan’s phone could shed valuable light on why he did what he did and help figure out who (if anyone) helped him on his path.

But cracking the phone isn’t a matter of course — the FBI’s currently weighing its “legal and technical” options to get inside the unspecified device. A lot of the FBI’s work here depends on what kind of iPhone they recovered, too — the introduction of iOS 8 two years ago meant not even Apple could decrypt the contents of a locked device running that software.

“Unlike our competitors, Apple cannot bypass your passcode and therefore cannot access this data,” the company wrote in 2014, referring to photos, messages, contacts and more. “So it’s not technically feasible for us to respond to government warrants for the extraction of this data from devices in their possession running iOS 8.”

Still, that didn’t stop the FBI cracking from iPhone 5c owned by Rizwan Farook, one of the San Bernardino shooters who killed 14 people in late 2015. The road to that crack was a winding one — the FBI originally pushed Apple for support to unlock the iOS 9-powered device, and got court orders compelling the company to assist. Apple resisted, but the FBI ultimately found a way to crack Farook’s iPhone without Apple’s assistance, a move that apparently cost the bureau a tidy sum. At the time, FBI director James Comey said he hadn’t decided if the bureau would reveal that crucial backdoor to Apple out of concerns it would be closed.

While the FBI might still have that particular ace up its sleeve, the process of sifting through Adan’s data might be way more difficult. Farook’s iPhone 5c lacked the secure enclave that was baked into newer models with the A7 chipset and beyond. It’s unclear at this point how much progress the FBI has made — only time will tell if it’ll try to force Apple to help somehow, or how Apple will response if the government comes knocking.

Source: Wired

8
Oct

GoPro’s Hero5 Black and Session bring overdue improvements


Recently, GoPro unveiled an entirely new product lineup. Not just the new Hero5 Black ($399) and Hero5 Session ($299), but also the Karma drone, a surprise handheld gimbal — known as the Karma Grip — and a brand new cloud service called GoPro Plus. While it’s going to be another week or so before we can get our hands on the Karma drone, I had a chance to spend some time with the new flagship Hero5 Black and its sidekick, the Hero5 Session. Both come with some exciting, long awaited new features, which I’ll lay out in detail below. With many of the upgrades addressing common pain points, it’s clear that this year, GoPro was mainly focused on polishing the user experience.
Until the Hero5, pretty much every new GoPro camera was defined by an increase in resolution. The first Hero HD was 1080p, the Hero2 added bumped photos from 5 to 11 megapixels, and so on until the Hero4, which ushered in 4K at 30 frames per second. The Hero5 Session gets an upgrade this time around, also joining the 30fps/4K club (the original Session maxed at 1440p). But with the Hero5 you won’t see any upgrades of that sort.

In particular, there’s no 4K/60fps shooting mode, as some might have hoped for. In fact, the Hero5 Black’s sensor is the same one found in the Hero4 Black. That’s not a bad thing, per se — you can still record in 4K, with additional options for 2.7K/60fps, 1080p at up to 120fps, and super slow-mo 720p at 240fps (plus all the quirky formats like 1440 that GoPro users will be familiar with).

That doesn’t mean there isn’t anything new here. In fact, the Hero5 and Hero5 Session come with a bevy of updates that make the cameras much more useful. Many of the new features come to both the Session and the Hero5 Black, though the flagship Hero5 gets a few extra tricks to keep its position at the top.

New for Hero5 Black

Waterproof design

Perhaps the most obvious change with the Hero5 Black is that it’s waterproof without a housing (the original Session and therefore new Hero5 Session already were). This means you won’t need a separate case to protect it. The upsides are obvious: Though the naked camera is a smidge bigger than the Hero4 Black (a millimeter or so each side), it’s considerably smaller than the Hero4 encased in its housing (which is how you most often see it). The result is that the Hero5 Black is much more pocket friendly, and you won’t need to pry open the case just to charge it or access the memory card.

The native waterproofing “only” works to a depth of 33 feet/10 meters, but that should be good enough for the vast majority of people. If you like, you can still buy a case for added protection up to 196 feet/60 meters. I took the Hero5 Black for several prolonged dips in the Mediterranean, and it’s much nicer to swim with the smaller camera. The rear LCD (also new) was still usable, though at times it took a few attempts to get my taps to register — something most phone owners can relate to.

Another added benefit is that without a case, the camera’s microphones record better audio both in the water or on land. The classic “rattle” you hear on GoPro many water-based videos isn’t yet a thing of the past, but the setup here is much less distracting.

There is a downside to the new design, however: The Hero5 won’t fit many accessories such as drone/handheld stabilizers that were specifically designed for the Hero3 and 4. Ditto for any accessory that uses the rear connector, since the Hero5 no longer has one (now everything goes through either the USB-C or HDMI ports on the side). I tried jury-rigging the Hero5 into a Feiyu-Tech handheld stabilizer (pro-tip: use a hairband to hold it in place) and it worked pretty well. It’s not ideal, but it might ease the transition for those with a sizable GoPro accessory kit.

The benefits of not needing a case will likely outweigh the downsides for most people — though of course if you’re invested in certain accessories, you’ll need to consider if the Hero5’s other new features are enough to sweeten the deal.

GPS

Rugged cameras and GPS go together like jam and peanut butter. Not if you owned a GoPro, though. This seemingly obvious feature has been conspicuously absent from the Hero lineup — until now. GoPro’s still not going all in, though. While the Hero5 Black does have a GPS sensor, it doesn’t do much right now other than tag your videos and photos with the location where you shot them. If you were hoping for Garmin-style data overlays showing your speed, height, location, et cetera, you’ll have to wait a bit longer. Those feature are coming, at least: GoPro recently scooped up Dashware, a company dedicated to exactly that kind of thing, so it’s only a matter of updating the software, a GoPro rep told me. Besides, and GoPro’s not shy about adding features after the fact.

Touchscreen and user interface

The Hero4 Silver was the first GoPro with a touchscreen. That single feature made it our top pick for most people, besting the screen-less (but more advanced) Hero4 Black. This time around there is no Hero5 Silver; GoPro just added a touchscreen to the Black and made the Hero5 Session the step-down model. The Hero5’s display is slightly larger than that the one on the Hero4 Silver, thanks in part to the removal of the bus port on the back. As I found too, it’s clearly visible even in direct sunlight.

Perhaps the bigger story, though, is the user interface, which feels more more simple compared to the Hero4. Access different menus (e.g., gallery, settings, camera modes) by swiping from one of the four of the edges, where’ll you then find related submenus. You might encounter a small learning curve if you’re familiar with the old UI, but I find it’s faster and easier to use once you get the hang of it.

Some of the submenus require you to scroll or swipe through options, much like on your phone. At times, the menu wasn’t always as responsive as I’d hoped, often switching back to the previous selection or registering a swipe as a tap and choosing a menu option by mistake. This didn’t happen every time — it seemed to occur more in humid weather or when my hands were wet — but it was very annoying when it did happen. When it works, though, navigating options and viewing menus is an improved experience. It’s also great that the flagship camera now has the touchscreen it deserves (remember, the Hero4 Black didn’t have one, but the Silver version did).

Advance image capture modes

GoProRawUnDevelop2.jpgGoProRawDevelop2.jpg

Just weeks before the Hero5 launch, GoPro updated the Hero4’s firmware adding manual white balance, ISO and shutter settings. The humble action camera might be about living in the moment, but plenty of photographers like to get their hands dirty with manual controls. The Hero5 comes with the same manual exposure controls plus — drumroll, please — support for RAW image files. This is great news for those who want to develop their own digital images. It’s also an advanced feature that will keep GoPro in favor with professionals.

The slider above shows an automatically generated image by the camera (left) and a self-developed one from a RAW file (right). You can make similar corrections in using a photo editor, but the RAW file means you can develop several different versions while keeping the original source info intact.

Unlike some formats, the RAW files on the GoPro won’t eat into your memory card. In fact, often the “.GPR” file (compatible with Adobe Light Room and Camera Raw) is smaller in size compared to the accompanying .JPG (about 3.6MB compared to an average of 4.3MB for a 12-megapixel shot).

If, on the other hand, you do want a little help with your exposure, the Hero5 Black comes with a so-called WDR mode. It’s similar to the HDR function found on many other cameras, just with GoPro calling it “wide” dynamic range, instead of high. If you’re taking photos looking into the sun, or where there’s a great variation of light levels, WDR mode can help you get a more balanced exposure.

In my experience, WDR mode has a modest effect, usually adding some brightness to shaded areas in the foreground, or around the area of focus. Usually this is a welcome change, but depending on the general exposure and light conditions, it can emphasize parts of the image that are grainy or not in focus. In the example below the WDR image is on the right. As you move the slider, you can see that the bushes in the center looks more fuzzy, while the grass beneath and in front appears sharper.

Given the flexibility of RAW files, this might be a better option for those with time to edit after the fact, but WDR is a handy option if you’re in a hurry. Keep in mind, though, that you can only use one mode at a time, so if your memory card and schedule allow, go with RAW.

GoProWDROff.jpgGoProWDROn.jpg

Battery

Not so much of a new feature, but the battery inside the Hero5 Black is different than the one used in the Hero4 and Hero3. This too is bad news if you’ve built up a collection, as the ability to interchange them was always something of a bonus, especially given how easy it is to burn through one. Worse, GoPro tells me that the batteries in the Hero5 have a chip on them that only allows official cells to work. Of course, the company line is that this ensures the best user experience with only approved batteries working, but that pretty much wipes out the cottage industry of third-party (and usually cheaper) batteries that many people like to stock up on.

As for battery life, in my tests it managed just over two hours of constant recording at 1080p/30fps without GPS or any of the other energy-draining modes. Incidentally, this is almost exactly the amount of time it’ll take to fill up a 32GB SD card. The Hero5 Session faired worse, clocking in between an hour and a half and an hour and 45 minutes.

New for both cameras

Unsurprisingly, the pricier Hero5 Black got the lion’s share of new tricks, but there are some decent upgrades that apply to both cameras, including some features GoPro users have been demanding. The addition of these to the cheaper Hero5 Session make the smaller camera a tempting proposition. If you can live without the LCD and some of the advanced image modes, but still want 4K (and the features below), the $300 Hero5 Session is definitely worth considering.

Voice control

“GoPro start recording.” Expect to hear that a lot this winter on the slopes. Both new cameras respond to a slew of voice commands that let you start and stop recording, take photo bursts, set a highlight tag, shoot pictures, change modes and switch the camera off. This is great for when you have the camera mounted just out of reach (selfies!), or when pressing the button would ruin the moment like jumping off a cliff (or small diving board, in my case).

Voice commands are available in seven languages: English (US and UK), French, Italian, German, Spanish, Chinese and Japanese. It works well — once you stop being self-conscious about speaking to your camera. Often I found myself using voice commands even when I didn’t strictly need to; it was easier to say “GoPro take photo” than navigate the menus, change modes and press the shutter. Be warned that if there’s a lot of wind or background noise, the camera often won’t hear you and you’ll miss your shot. Or, at the very least, you’ll feel a bit silly having to say the command again.

There’s also a secondary benefit/downside, which will depend on whether you have idiot friends or multiple GoPros: The Hero5 literally responds to anyone’s voice. So, on the plus side, if you have a few cameras rigged up, you can easily trigger them all at once. On the down side, so can anyone else within speaking range. Pranksters can easily say “GoPro, stop recording” to ruin your moment, or of course by accident. To counter this, GoPro says future versions will learn your voice similar to Siri, but for now it’s open season. The cameras come with a list of commands, but there are a few easter eggs not included on the list that are actually genuinely useful (hint: they are mostly things people say after landing a trick or doing something exciting).

Stabilization

This is another biggie: Both Hero5 cameras finally have built-in stabilization. There are some caveats, though. It’s not full optical image stabilization (OIS) like what Sony’s Action Cam has. Instead it’s electronic stabilization (EIS), which means the camera is using software to stabilize the image. Typically, OIS is the preferred method, as this steadies the image when it enters the camera. EIS trims a little bit of the image around the edges, and uses that as a buffer to digitally create a sense of stability.

The good news is that it works well. In early side-by-side testing, while walking with two cameras side by side (one with EIS, one without), the resulting image is clearly less jittery and prone to any sort of “jelly” effect — a common occurrence in video shot with a handheld grip. As we noted in our initial hands-on, there is some noticeable distortion around the edge of the image, as the center point tends to remain fixed while the software adjusts the rest on the fly. Side note: When activated, this feature will eat into your battery life.

The addition of EIS is going to be well received, but stabilization is actually a huge part of Karma too. That drone features its own mechanical stabilizer, which GoPro designed to be removable so it can be converted into a handheld gimbal as well. In fact, stabilization is so vital to the Hero5 with Karma, that we plan to give this feature a much more through test in our Karma review. For now, though, suffice to say that the in-camera EIS will smooth out your basic footage, with the trade-off being a dent in battery life and some light distortion at the edges.

A video posted by James Trew (@thatstrew) on Oct 4, 2016 at 7:57am PDT

Linear mode

GoProNonLinear.jpgGoProLinear.jpg

GoPro is pretty much synonymous with the fish-eye lens at this point. It works well for a lot of action sports, but for casual videos it can be a distraction. As GoPro cameras find their way into the pockets of those just looking for a versatile, rugged shooter, the constant fish-eye has become a bugbear for many. You could always remove it via desktop software, or reduce it on the camera by shooting in a medium field of view, but both of those options felt like a compromise. Now, there’s Linear mode.

As you may have guessed, Linear mode removes the curved effect of the fish-eye lens, resulting in nice, straight lines — whether it’s the horizon, or a lamp post — just as nature intended. Again, it works well. So well, in fact, that it’s tempting to keep it on. But be warned: It’s another feature that’ll tax your battery. It will also slightly crop your image as the “straightened” version will inevitably be longer. Below is another slider with a regular shot and the same picture with Linear mode applied. This is especially pertinent to Karma, as aerial videos are plagued by curved horizons with a fish-eye lens. Not a problem anymore.

Apps and GoPro Plus

GoPro has made a lot of progress with the apps that you use in tandem with your camera, particularly on mobile. The main app for your phone has been rebranded Captur, and although its functionality mostly remains the same, the pairing process with the camera has been greatly improved. I used to generally avoid using the GoPro app unless I really needed to, because it always seemed to not connect properly or forget my camera completely. (I do change phones more than most, to be fair.) The setup process was also laborious, involving connecting to the camera’s WiFi hotspot, doing a little dance and hoping you remembered your password. Not anymore. Just switch the camera on, the app will find it, and basically that’s it. Much, much improved.

This brings me to GoPro Plus, a $5-per-month cloud service that will store 35 hours of video, 62,500 photos or some combination thereof. Again, this is an area where we’re likely to go into more detail when we review Karma, but I was able to try it and get a sense for how it works. The premise is simple: Come back from your day outdoors, plug your GoPro in to charge and it’ll automatically upload your videos and photos to the cloud. These files will then be available in the Captur mobile app or the Quik desktop app where you can use them to create edited videos.

The idea is that editing will be even more convenient. And it does, but my personal workflow is already built around handling memory cards and offline files. So now I find I’m manually importing for the most part, with Plus serving as a handy backup. As with all cloud services, the bottleneck is with the uploading and the downloading on the other end. GoPro tells me that eventually cloud videos will be directly editable from the Quik mobile app (currently only offline videos are available). Once this is the case, Plus will be much more useful.

Cloud services have great potential, but there’s also a downside: the monthly cost. Five dollars isn’t a huge amount, and you get access to a large library of free-to-use music in addition to your storage space. But with Google and others offering a basic service for free, Plus will mostly appeal to hardcore GoPro users — in the beginning, anyway. Not least because it’ll also get you a 20 percent discount on accessories, so it could pay for itself if you’re the spendy type.

If you’re not ready for the cloud just yet, GoPro also introduced a mobile accessory called the “Quik Key,” which is essentially an iOS- or Android-compatible microSD card reader on a key fob that costs $20 for Android phones, or $30 for iOS. Place your memory card in the fob and stick it into your phone, and it’ll open the Quik app automatically, making file transfers incredibly fast and efficient. This is basically GoPro’s mission: to get you making mini movies as easily as possible, and Plus, Quik Key and the Quik app are all designed with this goal in mind. My favorite combination is Quik Key and the mobile app. The first mini edit I made with this combination was simple and suprisingly fun. It makes you want to do more, and the best part is there’s no need to sit hunched over a computer.

Wrap-up

GoPro made its name by making tough, little cameras. Over time, those cameras got more and more capable, but in the race for more features, some of the fundamentals seemed overlooked. With Hero5 Black and Hero5 Session, GoPro has made a big push to rectify these neglected areas. Some of the new features are still under-exploited (GPS, Plus etc.), but for the first time in a while, GoPro looks like it has a clear vision.

The cameras are much simpler to use. Heck, more fun to use too — and getting video and photos out of them is easier than ever. There are still a few areas for improvement, though. I’ll never stop wanting more battery life from a GoPro, and I’d love optical image stabilization, as well as some general image improvements. But all in all, this is a strong response from GoPro to a turbulent 18 months.

Photos by Edgar Alvarez.

8
Oct

Alphabet is working to squash the Zika virus, too


There are a few ways to kill off a pest: eliminate its food supply, or, make sure it can’t effectively procreate. Since the pest in question for this post is mosquitos, the former solution isn’t an option. So, Verily, the life-science division of Alphabet Inc., is addressing the Zika-carrier with a spin on the latter, according to MIT Technology Review.

As is normal with the company’s far-fetched projects, the anti-mosquito experiments have mostly been done under the veil of secrecy. But because one of the tests involves driving vans into neighborhoods and releasing millions of altered male mosquitoes, Verily is pulling the curtain back a little bit.

“People in some parts of the U.S. are asking for help,” Verily’s vice president of engineering Linus Upson told Technology Review. “But if we are going to release mosquitoes in the real world, we need to talk to communities. This isn’t like launching a consumer internet service.”

And he’s right. One method of stopping the diminutive airborne scourge is administering a gene drive, a DNA construct that turns poisonous when passed onto offspring. That’s still in its infancy. Another is infecting the bugs with the bacteria Wolbachia, which, when carried by males, causes females eggs to not be fertilized properly. From the sounds of it, that one is in the embryonic stages as well, but the closest to being tested and accepted by communities. For example, trials from other companies using methods similar to that haven’t caused any public outcry.

The FDA has already approved using genetically modified mosquitoes to combat Zika, so perhaps Verily’s efforts will see the light of day sooner rather than later.

Source: MIT Technology Review

8
Oct

Google Assistant is gender-neutral(ish), but it’s not feminist


In a world occupied by Siri, Cortana and Alexa, Google Assistant is a bit of an anomaly. It’s the first widely used voice assistant to eschew a female name, which the company reportedly did to avoid giving it a personality. The company would rather you imagined yourself talking directly to “Google the search engine” than a go-between. Avoiding a gendered name just happened to be a happy coincidence, it seems.

Despite Google (perhaps unintentionally) shunning obvious sexism in its AI, it still fell into the gender bias trap by giving Assistant a female voice. And that’s a problem, a problem that will require the collective effort of the industry’s powerhouses to fix.

A Google spokesperson told Engadget that the company started with a female voice for Assistant “as it’s something we already had available via the Google voice search technology.” This is the same voice that’s been used in many Android devices for years now, responding to our “OK Google” commands and requests. It’s been extensively fine tuned and worked on over time. A male voice was not available in Android, except via the text-to-speech output settings, which required users to install and switch to new language packs (such as British English). Google’s spokesperson said that the company is “thinking about how to expand beyond a female voice but (has) nothing to share at this time.”

Using a woman’s voice for a bot named “Assistant” is a problem because it ties that subservient role directly to gender. But the thing is, it’s not Google’s fault. It’s not even really the tech industry’s fault. Studies have shown that people prefer female voices for biological and historical reasons. The modern generation has also grown used to them — in-car GPS units and plenty of other audio devices have long used calm-sounding feminine voices to talk to us. It’s so ingrained in our collective subconscious that, even though you can already change Siri’s voice to a male one, the female version is the one that’s become iconic. Can you imagine Siri as a guy? Probably not. But it’s time for a change.

AI makers can start by offering options. It’s not going to be easy to just implement a new voice altogether, but at least Google says it’s thinking about the issue. Amazon and Microsoft still don’t have male options for their assistants and don’t appear to have plans to change that. Apple is the only one right now that lets you pick from a variety of languages, accents and genders for Siri, though it still uses a female name. That should also be changed. It’s not enough to just offer male vocal alternatives without changing the character’s basic identity. Companies should also work towards providing different characters of all genders that users can choose and avoid defaulting to a woman all the time.

Creating options is a good first step, but it’s important for these tech titans to work toward crafting a gender-neutral assistant. Startup Kasisto has proven it’s possible with its androgynous MyKai chatbot, although, like Facebook’s M, it doesn’t have a voice. If these bots are meant to be nothing more than helpers that yield to our every will, it’s better to dehumanize them altogether by not assigning genders than to pretend we have a person (or a feminine non-human) at our beck and call.

8
Oct

Why ‘teleportation’ makes sense in virtual reality


Getting around in virtual reality is a bit tricky right now. Even in room-scale VR, players are restricted by the physical size of their play space. Trying to walk to a point on a digital horizon might cause you to crash into a very real wall — which is why VR games like Robo Recall and Budget Cuts allows players to teleport through the experience, rather than walk. This works surprisingly well, but I could never put my finger on why it worked. At Oculus Connect 3 this week, VR filmmaker Eric Darnell gave me an answer: teleportation in VR works because I grew up watching television.

Darnell has a lot to say about the future of storytelling in virtual reality — as the co-founder of Baobab studios, he’s made VR filmmaking his business. Teleportation, he says, is really just the VR equivalent of the “cuts” we’re used to seeing in TV and film. He credits Bullet Train for pioneering the practice in virtual reality, but seems to think the mechanic was inevitable. “Teleportation in games is like giving the viewer or player the ability to ‘edit’ their experience in film.” It feels somewhat natural because it’s a storytelling tool filmmakers have been using for over a century. Giving that control to the player, however, makes his job a little harder.

The challenge of VR storytelling, Darnell says, is that the filmmaker is forced up to relinquish control over the narrative to their viewer. The audience now has the ability to look away from the action, ignore the cues of the director or, in some cases, simply teleport away from the narrative altogether. The challenge of the VR storyteller is to be a director for the viewer, coaxing them to look, be and do what you want to move the story forward. Darnell thinks his team was able to accomplish that with their first film, Invasion, and hopes to get similar results from their follow up, Asteroids. The first film is available on the Gear VR store now, with the second coming soon.

8
Oct

US catches spies shipping military tech to Russia


We got some good things out of the Cold War, like James Bond and John le Carré, but overall it was a pretty miserable period in history. That’s why it’s so disappointing to see Russia trying to bring us back to those dark with its latest attempt at ham-fisted espionage. The Department of Justice has announced that an American and two Russians have been arrested on suspicion of running a scheme to swipe military technology. According to a statement, the trio posed as a US electronics startup in order to buy integrated circuits for weapons.

The story centers around Alexey Barysheff, a Brooklyn resident, and Russian nationals Dimitrii Karpenko and Alexey Krutilin. Barysheff posed as a technology entrepreneur, setting up front companies BKLN Spectra and UIP Techno. These firms were designed to purchase integrated circuits, digital-to-analog converters — although not the sort you’d expect to find in an audiophiles’ music room. Instead, they were components created by military suppliers for use in satellites, radar and missile guidance systems.

The sale and export of such technology is strictly regulated by the Department of Commerce to prevent it falling into enemy hands. UIP and Spectra arranged deals with vendors using false paperwork and lied about the reasons behind the purchase. Crates of military tech were then sent to Finland before being sent on to Russia in order to conceal the packages’ true destination. The trio will make an initial appearance in court later today with Barysheff in NYC, Karpenko and Krutilin in Denver. If found guilty of illegally exporting controlled technology, they’ll face a jail term of up to 25 years and a fine of $1 million.

Via: Daily Dot

Source: US DoJ

8
Oct

Top Russian officials authorized the DNC hack and others, US says


Russia directed the hack of the Democratic National Committee and other recent invasions of political organizations, according to the US Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security. The collective US Intelligence Community says that the attacks were intended to disrupt the on-going US presidential election, and given the scope of the intrusions, only the most senior Russian officials could have authorized them.

“The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts,” the USIC writes.

Russia has long been accused of orchestrating the hacks, but top officials have just as often denied their involvement. In early September, Russian president Vladimir Putin said, “On a state level Russia has never done this,” but then followed it with a caveat, saying, “Listen, does it even matter who hacked this data? The important thing is the content that was given to the public.”

The USIC also addressed recent foreign attempts to swipe data from state elections systems, noting that even though the attacks stemmed from servers operated by a Russian company, it wasn’t clear if the Russian government was involved. However, since voting machines are not connected to the internet and there are other safeguards in place, hackers wouldn’t be able to directly influence the election with an attack on these systems, the USIC says.

“The USIC and the Department of Homeland Security assess that it would be extremely difficult for someone, including a nation-state actor, to alter actual ballot counts or election results by cyber attack or intrusion,” USIC says. “This assessment is based on the decentralized nature of our election system in this country and the number of protections state and local election officials have in place.”

Still, the DHS is helping some states improve their cybersecurity systems and it urges officials to ask for assistance in running scans, assessing risks and establishing best practices.

Source: Office of the Director of National Intelligence

8
Oct

Silicon Valley bro sues Yahoo for reverse discrimination


This week hasn’t been particularly kind to beleaguered internet company Yahoo. CEO Marissa Mayer, former chief marketing officer Kathy Savitt and editor-in-chief of Yahoo News Megan Liberman have been accused of engaging in gender discrimination. According to The Mercury News, a lawsuit has been filed by former editorial director Scott Ard on the grounds that “Mayer encouraged and fostered the use of (an employee performance-rating system) to accommodate management’s subjective biases and personal opinions, to the detriment of Yahoo’s male employees.”

Ard’s suit also claims that within a year and a half, CMO Savitt had increased the number of “top female managers” from 20 percent to 80 percent.

“Savitt has publicly expressed support for increasing the number of women in media and has intentionally hired and promoted women because of their gender, while terminating, demoting or laying off male employees because of their gender,” the suit states.

“Of the approximately 16 senior-level editorial employees hired or promoted by Savitt in approximately an 18-month period, 14 of them, or 87 percent, were female.”

Ard, former Yahoo editorial director and current editor-in-chief of the Silicon Valley Business Journal, says that the performance review system was put in place to side-step California’s Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) act. WARN requires early warning of mass layoffs. He says that in 2014, his job was given to a recent female hire. Ard claims during his subsequent January 2015 review call he was told that because he wasn’t performing up to standards, he was being fired.

That’s after being rewarded with positive performance reviews and stock options for “fully satisfactory” work prior.

For its part, Yahoo says that the performance review process wasn’t guided by misandry, but fairness.

“Our performance-review process was developed to allow employees at all levels of the company to receive meaningful, regular and actionable feedback from others,” according to spokesperson Carolyn Clark in a statement to the Mercury News. “We believe this process allows our team to develop and do their best work. Our performance-review process also allows for high performers to engage in increasingly larger opportunities at our company, as well as for low performers to be transitioned out.”

Yahoo diversity reports indicate that women in leadership positions grew a whopping one percent from 2014 to 2015 (PDF). Those numbers don’t exactly support Ard’s claims, and this seems more like a pushback against diversity initiatives at tech companies than it is rooted in facts. Now, investigations surrounding how the company covered up a massive data breach and claims of it aiding the US government’s surveillance efforts are another matter entirely.

Via: Gizmodo

Source: Mercury News