Enter to win your own virtual reality headset in the Choose Your Own VR Experience giveaway
We all love having options, and options are what you get with this giveaway.
One hundred per cent free to enter, the Choose Your Own VR Experience Giveaway is your shot at winning either an Oculus Rift or an HTC Vive. Whichever device you choose, you’ll get to experience the groundbreaking world of virtual reality absolutely free.
The Oculus Rift uses cutting-edge optics and displays that are tailor-made for VR. Boasting a high refresh rate and a low-persistence display, the Rift creates a wide field of view that’s breathtakingly immersive. To take the experience further, the Rift’s advanced display technology works in tandem with a low-latency constellation tracking system to truly immerse you in your digital world.
Meanwhile, the HTC Vive comes out swinging with a stunningly-crisp 2160 x 1200 combined resolution and 90 Hz refresh rate for seamless interaction. The Vive also uses a front-facing camera to mesh real-world elements into your VR experience. What’s more, the HTC Vive features 32 headset sensors used to establish 360 degree motion tracking, picking up even the most subtle movements.
If you’re worried about either device fitting, fear not. The HTC Vive features interchangeable foam inserts and nose pads and fits most eyeglasses, and the Oculus Rift boasts an adjustable headset as well. Go with the Rift, and you can dive right into the thick of space combat with EVE: Valkyrie, or you can test your zombie fighting skills with the HTC Vive’s Zombie Training Simulator.
Either way, you can’t win either device without entering first. Sign up now for a free entry into the Choose Your Own VR Experience Giveaway.
MIT engineers make beaver-inspired wetsuit to keep surfers warmer
Large oceangoing creatures, like whales and seals, keep warm with thick layers of blubber. But smaller mammals like beavers and otters have a different method of insulation: Their dense fur, which traps warm air bubbles to separate their body from cold waters. MIT engineers have devised a wetsuit featuring a similar hairy layer made of rubber to insulate divers and surfers.
The researchers looked at beavers and otters because the small mammals stayed warm while remaining nimble and agile, key traits for wetsuit material. Their pelts also offered clues for how to keep surfers warm while submerged yet quickly shed water when they pop up on their boards. While the current understanding of their hair theorizes longer “guard” fur trapping air in the dense “underfur” beneath it, the exact mechanics were unknown, requiring further research by the engineers.
Their results, published in the journal Physical Review Fluids, found that the spacing of each individual hair and the animal’s diving speed affected how much air a surface would trap. They simulated the fur strands as tubes in a computer equation, resulting in a mathematical model to trapping different amounts of air, and thus, warmth.
“We have now quantified the design space and can say, ‘If you have this kind of hair density and length and are diving at these speeds, these designs will trap air, and these will not.’ Which is the information you need if you’re going to design a wetsuit,” associate head of the mechanical engineering department at MIT and co-author of the study Anette (Peko) Hosoi told MIT News. “Of course, you could make a very hairy wetsuit that looks like Cookie Monster and it would probably trap air, but that’s probably not the best way to go about it.”
Source: MIT News
Netflix deal screens movies both online and in theaters
Netflix’s first experiment with showing its original movies in theaters didn’t extend very far, but you’re about to get a better chance at catching those productions on a giant screen. The streaming service has forged a deal with iPic Entertainment that will screen movies in iPic’s upscale theaters the same day they’re available online. The agreement covers just 10 titles (starting with The Siege of Jadotville on October 7th) and will be limited to theaters in New York City and Los Angeles, at least at first. However, it’s a start — and iPic’s posh dine-in experience should make it more engaging than firing up a projector at home.
To no one’s surprise, both companies stand to gain a lot from the pact. For Netflix, this demonstrates that it’s making ‘real’ movies (i.e. not straight-to-video fluff) and might remind you that the service doesn’t just revolve around episodic stories. The move could also help close the largely arbitrary gap between theater releases and streaming availability. If studios feel the pressure to stream movies quickly, that increases the odds that they’ll turn to Netflix. It even gives Netflix a chance at winning Oscars, since the Academy won’t consider a movie unless it screens for at least a week in New York and Los Angeles.
And for iPic, this delivers a dash of much-needed content. Although it likes to host some not-quite-mainstream movies to begin with, iPic is also fighting a legal battle against major theater chains that land exclusives for big releases. This gives it a chance to fill seats in those moments when a conventionally-released blockbuster isn’t available.
Source: Wall Street Journal
ASUS ZenBook 3 review: A powerful MacBook competitor with issues
Apple’s tiny MacBook was a revelation when it debuted last year. It was thinner and lighter than most ultraportables on the market, and its refined design brought over some cues from Apple’s mobile hardware. So it was only a matter of time before a PC maker took a swing at a similar design. Enter the ASUS ZenBook 3, a minuscule machine that promises to be just as portable as the MacBook while packing in much faster hardware. But while ASUS has proved it can sell powerful machines for far less than the competition, it’s less experienced when it comes to delivering truly premium hardware. The ZenBook 3, while attractive on the surface, is a reminder that ASUS still has a lot to learn.
Hardware
At first glance, the Zenbook 3 screams luxury. Its aluminum alloy case is smooth and sleek, and it measures an impressive 11.9mm at its thickest point. I particularly liked the deep shade of blue and the gold accents, which are classy in a subtle way. ASUS’s ZenBook line is unquestionably “Apple-inspired,” with an emphasis on thin profiles and all-metal cases. But the ZenBook 3’s design in particular looks like a mixture of the MacBook and the 11-inch MacBook Air, right down to the small notch below the trackpad and the look of the speakers above the keyboard. That’s one way to evoke a premium feel, I guess. But it would have been nice to see some actual innovation, as with HP’s sexy new Spectre.
With a 12.5-inch display, ASUS managed to outdo the MacBook by half an inch. But Apple’s laptop boasts a higher-resolution 2,304 x 1,440 display, as compared with 1080p on the ZenBook. At least it’s a good-looking display, though; it’s bright enough for outdoor use, while colors appear vibrant and mostly accurate. Though it’s not a touchscreen display (that’s to be expected with such a thin laptop), ASUS covered it in Gorilla Glass 4 for extra protection. After testing out plenty of touchscreen Windows laptops over the past few years, though, I’m surprised by how much I missed that feature here.
While the two-pound ZenBook 3 feels light and sturdy at first, it wasn’t long before I started noticing flaws. Applying a bit of pressure around the laptop’s keyboard leads to some seriously disturbing creaking noises, as if the seams around the bottom of the case are rubbing against each other. It’s not something you might ever do to your laptop, but this also doesn’t bode well for long-term durability. If a bit of force from my hands can disturb the case’s integrity, how can I ever trust it in a book bag with other heavy items?
Then there’s the keyboard and trackpad, which present a different set of issues. The ZenBook 3’s buttons have more travel than those on the relatively flat MacBook, but the feedback you get when pressing them is mushy and insubstantial. Perhaps it’s just because I’m a heavy typer, but I was never able to get into a decent typing flow. While I eventually got used to the wonky feedback, I still get more typos with this machine compared with every other laptop keyboard I’ve tested recently. Honestly, even though the MacBook’s keyboard isn’t ideal either, I still prefer it to the ZenBook 3’s.
The trackpad, while large and relatively smooth, is a chore to use. It requires a lot of pressure to register clicks, which isn’t great when you’re trying to balance an ultralight notebook on your lap. It would often get confused with left and right clicks, and on several occasions I had to press down multiple times for it to register anything. Tapping the trackpad to select things isn’t great either, as it often moves the pointer off your target. And for some reason, ASUS thought it was a good idea to put its fingerprint sensor right on the trackpad. That effectively renders the top-right portion of the trackpad a dead zone most of the time.
At least the fingerprint sensor works well; it usually gets me to the desktop in less than a second. On several occasions, I received warnings about Windows Hello being disabled because of too many fingerprint login attempts, even after I was just waking it up from sleep mode. I’m not sure why those errors occurred, but it makes me think that Windows Hello is somehow trying to identify fingerprints even when the ZenBook’s lid is shut. (And that could be tied to the flexing issue as well.)
You might have noticed one other nod to the MacBook: The ZenBook 3’s only ports are a single USB-C socket and a 3.5mm headphone jack. At least ASUS was kind enough to bundle in a USB-C mini-dock, which includes an HDMI port, a traditional USB connection and another USB-C socket. Unfortunately, you can use the dock’s USB-C port only for charging, which will make life difficult if you want to connect a USB-C device and an external monitor at the same time.
Performance and battery life
| ASUS ZenBook 3 (2.7GHz Intel Core-i7-7500U, Intel HD 620) | 5,448 | 3,911 | E2,791 / P1,560 | 3,013 | 1.67 GB/s / 1.44 GB/s |
| HP Spectre 13 (2.5GHz Intel Core i7-6500U, Intel HD 520) | 5,046 | 3,747 | E2,790 / P1,630 / X375 | 3,810 | 1.61 GB/s / 307 MB/s |
| Huawei MateBook (1.1 GHz Core M3, Intel HD 515) | 3,592 | 2,867 | E1,490 / P887 | 2,454 | 538 MB/s / 268 MB/s |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet (1.2 GHz Core M7-6Y75, Intel HD 515) | 4,951 | 3,433 | E1,866 / P1,112 | 2,462 | 545 MB/s / 298 MB/s |
| Dell XPS 13 (2.3GHz Core i5-6200U, Intel Graphics 520) | 4,954 | 3,499 | E2,610 / P1,531 | 3,335 | 1.6GB/s / 307 MB/s |
| Razer Blade Stealth (2.5GHz Intel Core i7-6500U, Intel HD 520) | 5,131 | 3,445 | E2,788 / P1,599 / X426 | 3,442 | 1.5 GB/s / 307 MB/s |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 (2.4GHz Core i5-6300U, Intel HD 520) | 5,403 | 3,602 |
E2,697/ P1,556/ X422 |
3,614 | 1.6 GB/s / 529 MB/s |
| Lenovo Yoga 900 (2.5GHz Core i7-6500U, Intel HD 520) | 5,368 | 3,448 |
E2,707 / P1,581 |
3,161 | 556 MB/s / 511 MB/s |
What’s truly impressive about the ZenBook 3 is that ASUS has managed to fit in seventh-generation Intel Core processors and gobs of memory in such a tiny case. Our review unit came with a Core i7-7500U, which offers speeds between 2.7GHz and 2.9GHz, and 16GB of LPDDR3 RAM clocked at 2,133MHz. ASUS says it worked with Intel to achieve that memory speed, which is faster than any other ultraportable on the market. It even exceeds the maximum 1,866MHz RAM speeds Intel officially supports for its latest chips.
The MacBook, on the other hand, is still stuck with slow Core m3 and m5 CPUs and a maximum of 8GB of RAM. Apple might refresh it soon, now that the seventh-gen Intel CPUs are available, but for the time being, ASUS wins the spec battle.
The ZenBook 3 felt just as zippy as other high-end ultraportables. It didn’t skip a beat during my typical workflow, which involves having several browsers open with dozens of tabs each, plus Slack, Spotify and Photoshop. And thanks to the video-decoding capabilities in Intel’s new processors, the CPU usage managed to stay below 20 percent when I streamed 4K video from YouTube. Basically, you’re not sacrificing any performance here.
Battery life
ASUS ZenBook 3
9:45
Surface Book (Core i5, integrated graphics)
13:54 / 3:20 (tablet only)
HP Spectre x360 (13-inch, 2015)
11:34
Surface Book (Core i7, discrete graphics)
11:31 / 3:02 (tablet only)
Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, 2015)
11:23
iPad Pro (12.9-inch, 2015)
10:47
HP Spectre x360 15t
10:17
Chromebook Pixel (2015)
10:01
Lenovo Yoga 900
9:36
Apple MacBook (2016)
8:45
Samsung Notebook 9
8:16
Dell XPS 13 (2015)
7:36
Microsoft Surface Pro 4
7:15
HP Spectre 13
7:07
Huawei MateBook
6:35
Razer Blade Stealth
5:48
Dell XPS 15 (2016)
5:25 (7:40 with the mobile charger)
When it comes to real-world battery life, the ZenBook 3 also outshines some recent ultraportables I’ve seen, like the Huawei MateBook and the Lenovo X1 Yoga with OLED. It typically lasted an entire workday, and sometimes it even had juice left over by the time I got home. In our typical battery test, which involves looping an HD video until the power dies, it lasted around nine hours and 45 minutes. Given that Intel is stressing video decoding with its new chips, though, that figure might not be directly comparable to other ultraportables. I’ll be testing the ZenBook 3 with other battery benchmarks soon and will report back with the results.
Configuration options and the competition
You have two choices with the ZenBook: the $1,099 model with a Core i5-7200U processor, 8GB of RAM and 25GB of storage; or the more powerful $1,599 version with a Core i5-7500U chip, 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD. The latter model was the one I tested, so keep that in mind if you’re hoping to achieve the kind of performance reflected in our benchmarks.
Apple’s MacBook, which is really the only direct competitor, starts at $1,299, with a significantly slower Core M3 CPU, 8GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD. Bumping up to $1,599 gets you a Core M5 and more storage, but you’ll still be stuck with 8GB of RAM.
If you can live with something slightly heavier, then you’ve got a wealth of ultraportable options to choose from, including HP’s revamped Spectre 13 (2.45 pounds), the fantastic Dell XPS 13 (2.6 pounds), and even Microsoft’s Surface Pro 4. All of those machines will likely get upgraded soon with Intel’s seventh-gen CPUs, so it might be worth waiting a bit (or snap up one of last year’s models if they’re on sale).
Wrap-up
Ultimately, with the ZenBook 3, ASUS did what it does best: pack in plenty of powerful hardware for a cheaper price than the competition. But the company’s inexperience at crafting truly high-end machines shows, with some truly worrying durability and usability issues. I give ASUS credit for building such a thin and powerful device, but what does that matter if the keyboard and trackpad are a pain to use?
‘Gears of War’ is headed to the silver screen
Today Microsoft has announced that it’s partnering with Universal Pictures to bring Gears of War’s hulking soldiers and massive monsters to the big screen. There’s no word on casting yet, but there is some information about who will be on the other side of the camera. Scott Stuber and Dylan Clark (Ted and the recent Planet of the Apes movies) will produce, and… well, that’s about all that’s known.
The Hollywood Reporter writes that New Line tried adapting the game for awhile before, but then licensing rights lapsed. We can only hope that this turns out better than the most recent, long-in-development video game movie, Warcraft.
This isn’t the first time Microsoft has flirted with Hollywood. However, a fundamental lack of knowledge for how the movie industry works rendered a Halo movie stillborn. It looks like since then, the folks in Redmond have learned a bit more about the movie business.
Gears of War 4 comes out October 11, 2016.
Samsung acquires Viv, an AI platform from the makers of Siri
Just a day after Google revealed its premium Pixel phone and Google Home featuring Assistant AI baked in, Samsung is making a splash by buying up some AI power of its own. Viv Labs was founded by some of the same people behind Apple’s Siri technology, who have referred to their new platform as an assistant that’s capable of anything. Co-founder and CEO Dag Kittlaus writes in a blog post that “Samsung will drastically accelerate our vision.” Samsung says the team will continue to operate independently, but it clearly has an eye towards integrating natural language understanding into its phones, TVs, appliances, VR and everything else.
Developing…
Source: Dag Kittlaus (Medium), Samsung Newsroom
Samsung Acquires Viv, the AI Assistant From the Creators of Siri
Samsung has acquired Viv, the AI assistant co-founded by Dag Kittlaus, Adam Cheyer and Chris Brigham, who created Siri, which was acquired by Apple in 2010, reports TechCrunch. The trio left Apple in 2012 and founded Viv. Viv will continue to operate as an independent company.
Viv has enhanced contextual understanding thanks to “dynamic program generation,” which means that Viv can understand the intent of a user’s queries and self-code responses on the fly. Viv can understand context and stack multiple queries on top of each other. For instance, at TechCrunch’s Disrupt NY event last year, Kittlaus was able to ask Viv whether it was raining in Seattle a couple days prior, following up with whether it’ll be warmer than 70-degrees near Golden Gate Bridge after 5pm the day after tomorrow.
Kittlaus tells TechCrunch that the reason it sold to Samsung was ubiquity. The company ships 500 million devices a year, he explained, which gives Viv a large distribution network. On the other hand, the acquisition gives Samsung its own AI assistant that can go toe-to-toe with Siri, Google Assistant and Amazon’s Alexa.
Samsung says that while the acquisition was done by its mobile team, the company sees the benefits to multiple product categories. “From our perspective and from the client’s perspective, the interest and the power of this really comes from taking advantage of the Samsung scale overall, as well as the richness of the touch points we have with consumers.” Viv’s technology may eventually work its way into Samsung’s non-mobile devices, like washing machines, refrigerators and TVs.
Advanced AI assistants have become a focus amongst Apple and its rivals recently. In May, it was reported that Apple was planning on introducing a next-gen natural language API in its rumored Amazon Echo competitor. The technology behind the API is the work of VocalIQ, a natural language outfit purchased by Apple in October 2015. The API has the ability to do “session-based” contextual responses similar to Viv.
Tags: Siri, Viv
Discuss this article in our forums
Pebble 2 review – CNET
The Good Affordably priced. Five-day battery life. Swim and shower-proof to 30 meters. Always-on display. Improved software makes glancing at quick notifications easier. Built-in microphone for quick text message responses. Works with Android or iOS.
The Bad Baked-in fitness tracking is uneven, especially heart rate and workout tracking. Plastic design. Small black and white screen is sometimes hard to read. Pebble’s apps and watch face options are often ugly.
The Bottom Line The Pebble 2 doesn’t win on fitness tracking, but it’s still a solid pick for simple notifications and messages on a long-battery budget smartwatch.
Visit manufacturer site for details.
I like the Pebble 2 as a watch, but I don’t like it as a fitness tracker.
Smartwatches are about compromise. Fitting everything on a tiny little wrist-gadget isn’t easy. And one thing most smartwatches cut short is battery life. That’s why Pebble’s watches have always earned a soft spot in my geek heart: they compromise on other things, but deliver on longer battery.
Pebble watches have features that no other smartwatches have really been able to crack: longer battery life, truly always-on screens, and all Pebbles (except the Round) have been water resistant, even for swimming.
Now, the Pebble 2 is going after full-on fitness tracking. Fitness trackers dominate sales on the list of top watches and wearables. The Apple Watch shifted into a fitness-forward mode. And so it’s no surprise that Pebble has jumped into fitness feet-first now, too.
View full gallery
Optical heart rate onboard.
Sarah Tew/CNET
New to this year’s Pebbles is an optical heart rate tracker: both the Pebble 2 and upcoming Pebble Time 2 (a color-screened sequel to last year’s Pebble Time Steel, coming later this year) have them.
The Pebble 2 is, otherwise, like a true sequel to the original, utilitarian black-and-white Pebble model from 2013, keeping that plastic design and tiny Game Boy-like screen. The Pebble 2 adds some improvements, like a Gorilla Glass-covered display and a built-in microphone to create voice notes or voice-respond to texts and Gmail (even on iPhones). It’s more compact, too. But it’s that fitness tracking, specifically heart rate, that’s new.
The Pebble 2’s going for fitness, not style. Can heart rate, combined with automatic step and sleep tracking, turn this smartwatch into a full fitness tracker…for $130 or £100 (equivalent to AU$170)?
Well, that’s where I ran into problems. I wish I could say everything worked as well as promised. I’ve been wearing the Pebble 2 for a week, and it’s far from what I’d call a great fitness tracker. But it’s trying really hard.
View full gallery
Step tracking has been available since earlier this year on Pebble Time watches.
Sarah Tew/CNET
Pebble as fitness tracker: Leaving a lot to be desired
Thanks to updates, last year’s Pebble Time and Time Steel have already been able to track steps and sleep automatically, with decent success. The Pebble 2 + HR model reviewed here (there’s another heart-rate-free Pebble 2 that costs only $100; this heart-rate-enabled version costs a bit more) takes things another step forward, with an optical heart rate tracker that sits on the back of the watch and spits out flashing green LED lights.
There are compelling reasons for the idea of Pebble-as-fitness-tracker: its battery lasts longer than any Android Wear, Samsung or Apple Watch (five days, even with heart rate enabled). And yes, the tracking for heart rate, steps and sleep is all automatic. It’s swim-friendly. And the only thing you need to manually do is start and stop workouts via a new included Fitbit Workout app.
View full gallery
Automatic sleep tracking works, basically.
Sarah Tew/CNET
But…Pebble’s fitness tracking feels like a bonus feature more than the main event, and that’s where many people will get turned off from the start. Pebble doesn’t have any of its own fitness watch faces, meaning you’ll have to find a third-party one that works for you if you want at-a-glance data without clicking down into Pebble’s app menus.
There are tons of watch faces on Pebble’s app store, many of them fitness-related, and some tap into the Pebble’s onboard heart-rate data, but they mostly look terrible, and aren’t easy to look at or use. A few are keepers. They tend to have a home-made, throwback, slightly ugly aesthetic. Pebble’s watchfaces aren’t easy to swap out, either, and can’t be easily be customized with complications — bits of at-a-glance data. Some watch faces support customizations, but you’ll have to hunt for a solution. I’d kill for a handful of good baked-in Pebble fitness watch faces.
View full gallery
What a workout readout looks like. Not a great use of screen space.
Sarah Tew/CNET
To see steps, sleep and heart rate data, you press up on the Pebble 2’s side buttons. Steps and activity are tracked automatically, which is handy. The Pebble phone app also syncs this data and presents graphs of daily steps and sleep, and all-day heart rate charts.
But workouts are a problem. A new Workout app has been added to the watch, which tracks walks, runs or generic “workouts.” Starting a workout means heart rate data, distance, pace and steps are shown at a glance. I found, however, that tracking walks or runs sometimes ended up with the app folding in data from before my stated workout time…as if the app sensed I had been walking already, and wanted to count those steps. But what if I don’t?
View full gallery Sarah Tew/CNET
Looking at the workout app, and even starting and stopping exercises, isn’t easy either: the Pebble 2’s side buttons are super small, and hard to recognize by feel (there are three buttons on the right, one on the left).
Even worse, the Pebble 2 doesn’t currently sync workout data to the phone app at all. An update to allow this is expected by November, but right now it means there’s no meaningful accumulation of workout info. So, right now, the Pebble 2 doesn’t keep track of workouts.
Pebble stores fitness data on the Pebble phone app, but doesn’t cloud-store the data like Fitbit. That means if you install the Pebble app on another device, you’ll lose the data. Pebble can sync its data (minus heart rate) via Apple’s HealthKit or Google Fit, but I’d be worried about suddenly losing a lot of accumulated charts down the road. The Pebble 2 works with a handful of other fitness apps, including Runkeeper, but support for these apps is a mixed bag, and not everything works with the Pebble 2’s heart rate monitor.
You can now shop entirely in Facebook Messenger
You’ve had the option of chatting with stores in Facebook Messenger for a while. Wouldn’t it be nice if you could complete the entire sale without leaving chat? Shopify thinks it can help on that front: it’s trotting out a feature that lets you browse and buy from just about any store using its platform while remaining strictly in Messenger. You don’t have to visit a website just to pick an item or check out. You’ll likely have to start the conversation from a company’s Facebook page, but it’s entirely possible that you could stick to chat from then onward.
The move helps stores, of course, since it may simply be more convenient to shop from an outlet where you already have a chat thread going. However, it could be particularly convenient to you if you regularly purchase through your phone. You don’t have to navigate a cut-down website or download a store-specific app — you’re using the same interface you use to talk to your friends. While there are certainly things a website or app can do that Messenger can’t (you won’t get elaborate product tours), it’s good to have options.
Via: TechCrunch
Source: Shopify
How to give Siri access to third-party apps in iOS 10 – CNET
Siri’s new tricks in iOS 10
In iOS 10, Siri can control third party apps so you can order a Lyft, send a WhatsApp or pull up animal Pins on Pinterest without touching your phone.
by Vanessa Hand Orellana
Close
Drag
When you install a new or updated app that promises to work with Apple’s Siri voice assistant, the natural thing to do is fire up Siri and try it out.
Only, you’ll quickly find either Siri has no clue what you’re talking about, or it prompts you to give access to the app’s information.
To save time, here’s how to give Siri permission to use apps beforehand:
Enlarge Image
Screenshot by Jason Cipriani/CNET
- Launch the Settings app on your iOS device.
- Tap on Siri.
- Tap on App Support.
There you’ll find a list of apps installed on your iOS device that will work with Siri. Enable the app or apps you want to use by sliding the switch to the On position, and then exit Settings.
The next time you use Siri, it should know exactly what you’re asking for and interact with the given app.
For example, I can say, “Call an Uber” to Siri and then it walks me through the process of getting a car without ever launching the Uber app itself.
You can read more in Taylor Martin’s guide to Siri’s new superpowers in iOS 10.
Here are the coolest new features of iOS…
1 – 5 of 11
Next
Prev
AIVAnet 