GE PGB911SEJSS review – CNET
The Good The $1,200 GE PGB911SEJSS is a good gas oven that does well with basic cooking tasks, such as boiling water and broiling burgers. It also has a useful reversible griddle on its cooktop.
The Bad The oven has trouble when it comes to evenly browning two racks of biscuits at the same time, even when you use the convection fan. The Bluetooth connectivity is limited at best.
The Bottom Line The GE PGB911SEJSS is a good pick if you’re in the market for a gas range.
Chris Monroe/CNET
GE Appliances has found its sweet spot in lower-priced ovens. In the $1,200-and-less category, the manufacturer has produced ovens with simple, thoughtful designs and consistent cooking performance. Take the GE JB750SJSS electric range, which cooked up a mean chicken and costs $1,000 (and you can probably find it cheaper), or the intuitive GE PB911SJSS electric range for $1,100.
We see much of the same reliability with the $1,200 GE PGB911SEJSS gas range. The appliance delivers decent cook times and comes with a reversible cooktop griddle that makes indoor grilling fun. The range includes a Bluetooth connection, but it only controls the light and vent system with GE’s corresponding over-the-range microwave. And the oven did have trouble evenly browning multiple racks of biscuits, and none of its cook times will set the world on fire.
The GE PGB911SEJSS gas range is $200 more than a similar gas range from GE, the JGB700SEJSS. That extra money gets you a few more cooking modes, along with the aforementioned Bluetooth feature and reversible griddle. If those things are important to you, you’d be safe bringing the GE PGB911SEJSS home. But you’d also be OK with the equally solid GE JGB700SEJSS and spending your $200 on the first few meals you’ll prepare on it.
GE’s got you covered with this gas range
See full gallery
1 – 5 of 12
Next
Prev
On this GE oven, two bonus features stand out
The GE PGB911SEJSS looks similar to the other lower-cost GE ranges that we’ve reviewed. This boxy, freestanding gas range is a standard 30 inches wide with stainless steel on the oven door and control panel. The GE PGB911SEJSS comes with a 5.6 cubic foot oven that has a convection fan built into the back wall for more even distribution of hot air during baking. Cast-iron grates cover four round burners on the cooktop and a fifth, oval burner lies in the center of the surface.
GE includes a reversible griddle for the center burner; you can grill items like hot dogs or burgers on the side with the raised edges and grilled cheese sandwiches, pancakes and the like on the flat side. We’ve seen a lot of ranges that include griddles for center, oblong burners, including the LG LRG4115ST and the Samsung NX58H9500WS, but I really enjoyed cooking with the reversible option that comes with this GE range. Though it’s not a high-tech feature, it’s a wise addition that gives home cooks a few more options.
One side of the griddle works well for grilling meats like hamburgers and hot dogs.
Chris Monroe/CNET
Another noteworthy feature on this GE range is the Chef Connect button, which activates the oven’s Bluetooth connectivity. The range syncs with GE’s Bluetooth-enabled over-the-range microwave ovens so that the light beneath the microwave and exhaust fan will automatically turn on if you turn on a burner. The connection is functional but useless if you don’t have the corresponding microwave, a drawback I noted on the Bluetooth-enabled GE PB911SJSS.
Performance is on par with competition
When it comes to cook tests, the GE PGB911SEJSS held its own against similar gas ranges. None of the cook times were extremely fast or slow, but the range proved that it can complete the basic functions of an oven.
Yale Look Video Doorbell Release Date, Price and Specs – CNET
Yale’s new doorbell cam lets you see who’s rinigng
Coming in October, the $170 Yale Look is a Wi-Fi doorbell cam with its own video monitor.
by Ry Crist
Close
Drag
Video doorbells have gotten a lot of attention over the past year. Now Yale, best known for its locks and deadbolt, wants in on the action.
Its product is called Yale Look, and it’s a $170 video doorbell that you’ll mount directly onto your front door. When someone walks up, a built-in motion detector will see them and start broadcasting the video feed to a touchscreen on the inside of your door. When they ring the chime, you’ll get a notification on your phone, along with the ability to view the feed or engage in two-way audio.
A dedicated video monitor sits on the inside of your door. You can also view the video feed on your smart phone when someone’s at the door.
Tyler Lizenby/CNET
That’s not too much different than what you’ll get with similar smart home doorbells from names like Skybell, August, and Ring, but Look sets itself apart with the addition of that dedicated video monitor on the inside of the door. It seems handy for people who don’t want their smart homes to tie them to their phone, but it looks a bit clunky, and also requires you to drill through the door to stay connected to the exterior camera. Good luck selling your spouse on that — let alone your landlord.
The video monitor includes a rechargeable battery that promises to last anywhere from six months to a year depending on usage. When it runs low, you can pop it off of the mount and recharge it via USB. It also comes with an 8GB SD card to store motion-activated video clips.
Yale tells us that the Wi-Fi version of Look will arrive at retail in October, with a second $240 version due out by the end of the year that’ll add in a Z-Wave radio to let it sync up with larger smart home control platforms like SmartThings or Control4. We’ll keep an eye out for both.
Kwikset Convert Smart Lock Conversion Kit Release Date, Price and Specs – CNET
The Kwikset Convert.
Ry Crist/CNET
Kwikset’s been making smart locks for years, but now, it wants to make smart locks out of the dumb locks most of us already use, thanks to a new smart lock adapter called Kwikset Convert.
We first heard about Convert back at CES — now, months later, we got a closer look at it at the CEDIA tech showcase in Dallas, Texas. It’s basically just the interior part of one of Kwikset’s smart locks — the part with the batteries and the brains. You’ll connect it to your existing deadbolt by way of a special set of adapters designed to fit a wide variety of locks, including ones from competitors like Baldwin and Schlage.
Once it’s installed, you’ll be able to connect your lock to a smart-home hub thanks to the built-in Z-Wave radio. From there, you’ll be able to lock and unlock your door from your phone, or automatically by way of preprogrammed automations.
You’ll be able to use Kwikset Convert with a wide range of deadbolts, including those not made by Kwikset.
Ry Crist/CNET
That’s a winning pitch for anyone who’s picky about the type of deadbolt they use, or for renters, who typically aren’t able to swap their deadbolts out for smart versions. It’ll also help Kwikset keep up with the August Smart Lock, which takes a similar approach with its clamp-on, app-enabled lock-turner.
Kwikset’s approach is a bit more hands-on than that, though. You’ll still need to break out the screwdriver to disassemble the interior half of your lock, then retrofit it to work with the Kwikset Convert controller.
Kwikset Convert is slated to arrive by February 2017. Pricing is yet to be finalized, but it sounds like it’ll almost certainly cost less than August, which retails for over $200. We’ll let you know as soon as we get a chance to test one out.
Nest Cam Outdoor review – CNET
Nest takes it outdoors
Nest’s first product in a year isn’t necessarily revolutionary, but it’ll allow for Nest monitoring in an outdoor setting.
by Jeff Bakalar
Close
Drag
The Nest Cam Outdoor will be available this fall.
Nest
Nest Cam Outdoor, a $199/£150 outside-only Wi-Fi security camera, is slated to join the smart home brand’s product lineup this fall. International availability is expected to follow soon after.
Complete with 1080p video resolution, livestreaming capabilities, two-way talk, a 130-degree field of view, and night vision, Nest Cam Outdoor shares a lot of specs with the Google/Alphabet property’s existing Nest Cam, now called Nest Cam Indoor.
The team super-sized the power adapter for the outside version, and extended the power cable to roughly 25 feet. A magnetic disk gives you an instant base plate when it makes contact with a gutter or another obliging surface. And since the palm-sized Nest Cam Outdoor has a magnetic backing of its own, outdoor installation sounds really simple. In theory, at least. Of course, if you don’t have something magnetic handy, the team also includes a screw-in base for a more permanent installation.
In other Nest news:
- Same great Nest, now with even better looks
- CEO Tony Fadell announces he’s leaving Nest
- Nest Cam Indoor review
- A new Nest device to Protect what matters most
On the software side of things, Nest Cam Outdoor will be accessible via the same Android and iPhone apps as before. You’ll still have access to Nest Aware (the brand’s opt-in month-to-month subscription service), too — with a few changes. Nest Aware already allows for advanced features like motion and sound alerts, and continuous cloud recording, but it will add a facial-recognition feature called Person alerts with the launch of Nest Cam Outdoor.
While Person alerts won’t be able to distinguish between specific people and strangers like the ArcSoft Simplicam or the Netatmo Welcome, it is supposed to be able to tell the difference between a face and something else, like a passing car. Maxime Veron, Nest’s director of hardware product marketing, said in an interview that the Nest Cam Outdoor might be able to distinguish among more things in the future, too. Veron also confirmed that IFTTT and Works with Nest integrations will be available at launch.
No, this new security camera isn’t a huge departure for the brand. In fact, we’ve been waiting for Nest’s next piece of hardware for quite awhile. Even so, I’m intrigued by Person alerts and look forward to trying it out when Nest Cam Outdoor hits stores this fall.
Polk MagniFi Mini Release Date, Price and Specs – CNET
Polk
The competition for compact, affordable sound bars is heating up with JBL, Zvox and now Polk getting in on the act.
The Polk MagniFi Mini ($299) is an “ultra-narrow soundbar and included slim wireless subwoofer” that is designed for smaller living spaces like bedrooms.
Despite the relatively low price it appears to be packed with features, including Bluetooth, networking (with Google Cast) and HDMI with Dolby Digital decoding. It also incorporates Polk’s patented sound modes for use at low volumes or to increase speech intelligibility.
Like the JBL Boost TV the Mini is compact at only 13.4 inches long and 3.1 inches high, though the JBL lacks a subwoofer. The MagniFi Mini includes four 2.25-inch drivers and two 12mm tweeters for the main unit.
The sound bar will be available in October, while UK and Australian pricing and availability are yet to be announced.
LG V20, G5, Note 7, S7 Edge: Display Showdown
If you haven’t realized it, of late, we’ve been detailing the display section of our reviews a bit more than we’ve done in the past. Since we’re always trying to evolve our reviews process, we’re diving deeper into how we look at the displays in smartphones, by taking a deliberate path of uncovering their qualities using our new benchmark process. And with that in mind, we’re focusing our attention on the latest smartphone from LG – the multimedia powerhouse in the V20.
On paper, the LG V20’s display reads very much similar to its predecessor, but we all know that it’s unlikely that the same panel has been recycled. Yes, the V20’s 5.7-inch Quad HD IPS-LCD display with Gorilla Glass 4 is identical to specs found with the V10 last year, as well as the inclusion of its Second Screen, but the company was sure to mention that the Second Screen was brighter than before, going up to 68 nits from the former’s 35 nit reach. All of that is fine and dandy, but most of the attention will be place on the main display – so with that, we’re here to uncover what LG has crafted here with the V20.
This wouldn’t be a fair analysis, after all, if we have nothing else to compare its results against. And that’s why we’re also including the Samsung Galaxy S7, S7 edge, Note 7, and LG G5 into the mix, to see exactly how LG’s latest phone fairs against the competition.
It’s really bright, brighter than most
Right from the get-go, the V20’s display is notable for the sheer amount of luminance it’s able to muster up. Reaching a peak output of 714 nits, the display ensures that visibility isn’t compromised at all when viewing it outdoors – with the sun glaring down on it. In my experience, displays that produce 500+ nits tend to be usable under these conditions, so it’s swell to know that the V20 retains substantial visibility. That, of course, is something worth praising, just because not every phone is able to remain visible when it’s used in direct sunlight. Using them in the dark is one thing, but it’s totally another outside on a sunny day.
In that respect, the V20 earns some respect for being quite usable outdoors. Comparatively speaking, it’s definitely up there when compared to its esteemed rivals – namely the stuff from Samsung’s camp. Relying on a totally different display technology, Super AMOLED to be exact, the Galaxy S7, S7 edge, and Note 7 all produce some respectable levels at a little over 500 nits, well above other high-end phones, but none of them can achieve the same level of potency.
However, the LG G5 is just a smidgen better, but not by much at all. In fact, it tops out at 755 nits, besting the V20 in the process, but we wouldn’t say that it’s enough to make it significantly noticeable day-to-day.
Unbelievably cold color temperature
Right away, something becomes apparent the moment we start surfing the web on the V20. A keen eye is definitely needed to make it out, but as we stare at some of the white dead space while surfing through some sites, it’s quite telling that there’s a colder color temperature with the display here. The color white has a tinge of blue in it, indicating the obvious: that it’s an extremely cold panel.
In our testing, the IPS-LCD display reaches a color temperature of ~9100K, which is nowhere close to the “ideal” temperature of 6500K – indicating that it’s neither too warm or too cold. Unfortunately for the V20, it steers towards the colder side of the spectrum, making it one of the coldest displays I’ve come across dealing with high-end and flagship phones.
Ironically, AMOLEDs have been known to be exceptionally cold with their color temperatures, but in recent years, Samsung has perfected its own homemade Super AMOLED displays to be on par to those using LCD technology. In this scenario, all of Samsung’s recent smartphones exhibit color temperatures that are very close to the ideal level of 6500K.
All told, the V20’s display is just obnoxiously colder toned than most other things on the market right now.
Ouch, it’s poorly color calibrated
Things don’t get better for the V20’s ability to accurately reproduce colors in the sRGB color spectrum chart, where it just fails to hit the reference points within the boundary. Sad to say, it manages to hit only one single target, but fails miserably with everything else. Bringing your attention to its color gamut chart in the sRGB spectrum, you can see how all the colors are inaccurately produced.
Yellows seems to be influenced by greens, while magentas have a hint of blue in them. Even worse, the V20 can’t even properly recreate the color teal, which is arguably the easiest color to reproduce out of the bunch. Honestly, it’s pretty rare for a display to botch the color teal, but the V20 does exactly that – wherein teals creep into blue territory.
Now, it’s one thing to be overblown and saturated, but there’s no consistency to the V20’s color path. For those who are particular about color accuracy, the V20 is an unlikely candidate, due to how it just can’t produce realistic, true-to-life colors. Well, it definitely shows that the V20 follows after the G5, seeing that the two results are nearly identical.
Over on the AMOLED side, Samsung’s offerings are close to perfect as they come when it comes to color accuracy – albeit, you’ll need to set the display to basic mode. Under its adaptive mode, the phones tends to produce more saturation with colors, which is not a bad thing for some folks.
Conclusion
Going back to its specs, we have zero complaints about what we see on paper with the V20’s screen. Quad-HD resolution, check. Sizable screen, check. Second screen, that’s a nice addition. But even though it’s able to push out some serious luminance, the overall tone of the display is subdued. Some displays just have that iridescence and charm when we first peek at them, drawing us closer to inspect them even more. With the V20’s display, however, I didn’t find myself ogling or drooling over the screen – it just looked decent, almost blah in a way.
That, of course, could all be attributed to its poor color temperature and its inability to accurately produce colors realistically. While its luminance isn’t called into question at all, since it’s actually one of the more potent ones out there, the other two qualities I mentioned just limits its ability to be compelling – from a display standpoint, naturally. You might not feel the same way, but if you were to place it besides any of Samsung’s flagships, you’ll see exactly how its superior qualities makes for a mesmerizing display that gets more attention.
What are your thoughts? Shout them out in the comments.
Galaxy Note 7 replacements hit stores on September 21st
If you’ve turned in your Galaxy Note 7 (like you should!), you’ve probably been wondering when Samsung would start getting replacement devices out the door. Turns out you won’t have to wait too long: the company just announced that “most retail locations” in the US will have the phone available on September 21st. This news comes as the US consumer safety group officially recalled the product, a move that Samsung already made a few weeks earlier.
In case you haven’t been paying attention to Samsung’s issues, the company recalled the Galaxy Note 7 after reports of the battery overheating and, in some cases, exploding. It’s been a tough few weeks for the company since, as it lost a huge amount of market value and had to suffer such indignities as the NYC MTA telling consumers not to use the phone on the subway and the FAA warning against using the Note 7 on airplanes.
The good news is that replacement phones will be out in the wild and in consumer’s hands less than a month since these troubling reports first started coming in. If you own a Note 7, you can either turn it in and get a new one when your preferred retailer has stock, swap it for a Galaxy S7 or S7 Edge and get a refund for the price difference or get a full refund. It looks like Samsung will have this embarrassing incident behind it before long, but it’ll certainly feel the impact when the company reports its financials next month.
Source: Samsung (BusinessWire)
Samsung’s Galaxy S7 camera lens case is a wonderful, hard-to-justify accessory
Just about everyone’s taking smartphone pictures with the same focal length — but you can change that.
Since the Galaxy S7 and S7 edge were released, I’ve been enamored by the official Samsung “camera lens case” that lets you attach two high-quality camera lenses — one wide-angle, one telephoto — to the phone for unique shooting possibilities. Then Samsung just didn’t launch the cases in the U.S., or pretty much any big market around the world. Being a self-proclaimed photography nerd I just had to try them, though.
So when the good people over at MobileFun offered to send me a Galaxy S7 camera lens case for review, I took them up on it right away. Here’s what I’ve found using is odd-looking contraption for my photographic escapades.
A fun new way to shoot
The important starting point here is that this is a package deal — in order to use the two lenses, you need to use the included case. Rather than sticking or clamping onto the phone like third-party solutions, you put a slick little silicone case on the phone that includes threads around the hole that exposes the phone’s camera lens. You then simply screw the lens you want into the nicely textured case, and you’re up and running — this ensures the lenses fit perfectly onto the built-in camera lens, for distortion-free shooting.
Nicer metal and glass than any third-party lens you’ll find
In the package you get a wide-angle lens and a telephoto lens. Samsung doesn’t give details on the focal length, but my educated guess is the wide-angle lens sits at about a 18 mm equivalent, and the telephoto a 60 mm equivalent. The lenses are good bookend focal lengths for the Galaxy S7’s integrated lens to sit right in the middle, giving you a triumvirate of lens options altogether.
Yes, this is very much the same idea on offer in slightly different ways in both the the LG V20 and iPhone 7 Plus, but the size and quality of these secondary Samsung lenses is in no way matched by those tiny integrated units. Both lenses are extremely well-made bits of metal with nice glass inside, and when they’re screwed into the case you get as good a connection to the phone’s camera lens as you can expect. They’re sturdy, look nice and stay put. The lenses have their own plastic carrying case that stows the lenses locked together with lens caps on the end.
The wide-angle lens is the smaller of the two, but still pretty big. It’s about twice the thickness of the Galaxy S7 itself. It’s almost small enough to let me fit the phone with the lens attached in my front pants pocket comfortably, but its size meant I couldn’t do that for long. If I wanted to commit to having the lens attached, that meant carrying the phone in my hand while it was put together. The lens is small enough as to not be conspicuous when you’re out taking photos, though.
At a glance it isn’t that large, and it’s even small enough that you can set your phone down on a table without it looking weird. The phone case also provides a small lip around the front of the phone that’s big enough to let you put the Galaxy S7 face-down on a table, which surely is to keep you from relying on putting pressure on the lens in the back.
Being used to the constraint of the typical focal length of a phone camera, I really enjoyed shooting with the wide-angle lens. With the lens attached you get a whole new look to your shots, letting you fit a huge scene into one snap, rather than doing some sort of panorama shot. There’s just enough of a fisheye effect here that you see curves in long straight lines, which is a little bit of a hallmark of such a wide lens.
Our own Jerry Hildenbrand (also a photography nerd) noted that some software tuning in the phone to fix the distortion in the wide-angle shots would have been nice, but I personally quite like the slightly distorted view. That little fisheye look gives it a unique feeling that clearly separates it from the view of the internal lens, and I used it to good effect in some specific shots that really accentuated the scale and scope of everything in the frame.
For as big as the wide-angle lens is, the telephoto lens immediately invokes visions of sports photographers on the sidelines with massive lenses hanging off of their DSLRs. The Telephoto lens is roughly double the thickness of the wide-angle lens. It’s big enough that you can set the Galaxy S7 on a table in landscape mode and the lens props it up like a kickstand (maybe a nice little backup feature).
It’s far too big to fit in your pocket, and it really sticks out when you’re just trying to use the phone “normally” while not taking photos. While you can kinda get away with having the wide-angle lens on the phone, the telephoto is very much something you put on, take some photos, then take off the phone for another time.
While I’m completely smitten with the look from the wide-angle lens, the telephoto offering is a bit more of a mixed bag. The roughly 60 mm equivalent is drastically different from what you’re used to shooting with a phone’s camera, and it takes a bit of getting used to. The combination of such a long focal length and still an f/1.7 lens behind it means you’re going to see lots of defocusing of the foreground/background and vignetting around the edges of the scene in practically every shot.
If you play around with it for a while you can use the features of the lens for really unique shots you aren’t getting anywhere else on a smartphone, at least not without synthetic software blurring of shots. But unlike the wide-angle lens, this telephoto lens isn’t so “point and shoot” ready. There were a lot of photos I took with the telephoto lens that were just bad and I deleted — it definitely took some finessing to get right.
Actually using the lenses regularly
I seriously enjoy the new shooting options and the great quality of the photos I get from these external lenses. The only real issue here is that the lenses themselves are horridly large in relation to a thin and compact phone. The little carrying case for the lenses is as compact as it can be, and the phone case is one I wouldn’t mind using every day — but the lenses are just too big to carry around on a regular basis.
And even when I have my messenger bag or a backpack with me to carry the lenses, I’m not exactly willing to plant my feet, open up my bag, take out and attach a lens just to take a photo or two before returning the lens to its case. It’s too much friction for me, and in my case it takes longer than simply pulling out the Olympus OM-D E-M5 that’s in my bag and taking a far superior photo.
Worth the money?
So taking that all into consideration, let’s talk price and value. Though the MSRP is a bit higher, retailers have the Galaxy S7 camera lens case on sale for about $110; that gets you the case and both lenses. (It’s also available for the Galaxy S7 edge, by the way.)
When it comes to add-on camera lenses for phones, it should be said I’m not the biggest fan overall. Having standalone separate lenses that you have to carry around and attach kind of defeats the purpose of having a great compact camera in your pocket that you can pull out and snap a picture in an instant. But if you’re someone who’s going to consider buying an external lens solution for the Galaxy S7, this official case is the only way to do it. No fussy clips, no low-quality components — just a system that’s designed specifically for the phone, that enables you to take great photos that you can’t get any other way.
Whether or not that’s worth $110 to you is another question that you’ll have to answer for yourself. The case you’re required to use for this setup is quite nice, and factoring that in may bring down the effective price for you… but this is still a big ask for something that you may end up finding isn’t something you’ll use regularly enough to justify owning. True photography nerds may get in on it, but average Galaxy S7 owners will likely stick with their integrated lens.
See at Amazon
Samsung Galaxy S7 and S7 edge
- Galaxy S7 review
- Galaxy S7 edge review
- U.S. unlocked Galaxy S7
- Should you upgrade to the Galaxy S7?
- Best SD cards for Galaxy S7
- Join our Galaxy S7 forums
Unlocked
AT&T
Sprint
T-Mobile
Verizon
Here’s how the new PlayStation 4 compares to the original!
How much thinner is the new PlayStation 4?
While all eyes were on Sony’s big PlayStation 4 Pro during the announcement, a new slimmer PlayStation 4 snuck onto store shelves. Instead of being called a Slim model like previous generations, it’s simply also called PlayStation 4.
The goal is to replace the current PlayStation 4 on store shelves eventually, leaving only this new model and the PlayStation 4 Pro for shoppers to choose between. Until that happens, there are a pair of boxes labeled PlayStation 4 on shelves and it’s not entirely clear what the differences between them are. Here’s what you need to know!
In keeping with Sony’s previous slim PlayStation releases, the goal with this new PS4 is mostly aesthetic. Sony claims the new PlayStation 4 consumes less power, but the big feature here is size. The new PlayStation 4 is noticeably thinner, and slightly narrower. As you can see by comparing the two side by side, the updated design drops the even split on either side of the big black line in the middle of the console and instead makes the top way thinner. This updated design is also matte black instead of glossy on half, and the under side of the casing swaps out streaks of anti-skid rubber for PlayStation themed anti-skid marks.
As silly as this may seem, the biggest update to the new PlayStation 4 design is the inclusion of discrete buttons on the face of the console. These two buttons, instead of the touch sensitive strips on the face, make it abundantly clear when you’re powering on/off and ejecting a disk. It’s a fairly small update in the grand scheme of things, but anyone who regularly tapped the front of the original PlayStation 4 only to have nothing happen will welcome the change.
Sony’s DualShock 4 controller has also received a slight update, though you wouldn’t know it by looking at them powered off. The touch pad in the center of the controller now shows you a sliver of light coming from the light bar. This means you know when the controller is producing light without looking at the back of the controller, and no extra power is consumed in the process. It’s a nice little detail, but not something that will send most folks scrambling to replace their existing controllers.
The new PlayStation 4, which is currently being sold in a 500GB bundle with Uncharted 4, is exactly what we’ve come to expect from Sony with its “slim” releases. It’s a physical update so this standard PlayStation 4 looks like a sibling to the PlayStation 4 Pro. It looks nice unless you’re a fan of the white version of the PlayStation 4, and as the packaging suggests it’s everything you need to get ready for PlayStation VR. Just like choosing between this new PlayStation 4 and the PlayStation 4 Pro, the biggest reason anyone would choose the original version over this newer version is price.
See at Amazon
AIVAnet 