Boat thieves thwarted by teens with a Phantom drone
A group of teenagers vacationing on Camano Island in Washington State became technology-assisted crimestoppers this week, ABC News reports. 14-year-old Chris Harris and his friend were visiting the island from San Francisco when they spotted thieves in a speedboat untying their own boat they had docked at a buoy the night before. When the thieves took off with their Zodiac in tow, Harris sprung into action and followed them from the air with his DJI Phantom drone, filming them in 4K video the whole time.
“The drone was given to me as a graduation gift from my parents for making honor roll,” Harris told ABC News. Although it took a minute to get it airborne, Harris says he flew the Phantom up to 50 mph, floating around 20 feet above the speeding thieves. He was apparently able to keep up long enough to get a great shot of the thieves from above, before he eventually lost track of them. Even so, the footage was enough for the local authorities to make an educated guess as to where the thieves were headed. According to the local Sheriff’s Department, the cops were waiting for the boat thieves when they arrived at their destination.
Despite his heroics, Harris seems to know that drone flights are still a somewhat uncertain legal grey area. “There’s good things and bad things about drones,” Harris told NBC Bay Area, while staring thoughtfully out over the waters of the Saratoga Passage, “but if you use them right and properly, then it’s a positive.”
‘Overwatch’ was June’s best-selling game, even with a handicap
In case you haven’t noticed, Overwatch is really, really popular. Popular enough to support millions of active players, host high-stakes professional competitive gaming drama and even inspire a graphic novel adaptation. All this, and the game’s barely three months old. Still not convinced? Okay, we’ve got one more thing: Overwatch sold better than any other game in June — and according to NPD Group, it won that top spot with a handicap.
Having a new game from a major publisher take the top spot in NPD Group’s sales report is nothing new — but this month’s sales data is sort of unique. June marks the first time the company has been able to include digital sales numbers. The twist? Overwatch’s digital PC sales aren’t part of the total.
Confused? Don’t be. Traditionally, NPD Goup only publishes numbers tracking physical game sales, but recently it struck a deal with a handful of publishers to self-report digital sales data. Unfortunately, this means the group can only publish digital sales numbers from companies that offer them willingly, and neither Sony, Microsoft or Nintendo are willing to share that data with the public. This means that titles like Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End and Doom appear on NPD reports with an asterisk — “No digital sales included in ranking.”
Activision Blizzard, Overwatch’s publisher, actually does report console’s sales to NPD Group — but for some reason, its PC Battle.net sales weren’t included in this month’s report. It made the top spot anyway, beating out Grand Theft Auto V, Lego Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Mirror’s Edge Catalyst and more. That’s impressive! Still, it would be more impressive if the chart reflected the full digital sales for every game on every platform. We won’t really know who’s winning the so-called “console wars” until the industry opens up and makes that data available.
LevitatingCup Release Date, Price and Specs – CNET

The LevitatingCup uses an electromagnet to float above bars and tables.
LevitatingCup
If you think crystal clear ice and smoke-steeped cocktails are cutting-edge bar techniques get ready something truly wild. Behold the $179 LevitatingCup, a glass which actually floats in air inches above counters and bar tops.
Suspended by the force of an electromagnet, the creators of the LevitatingCup claim this unique system is the world’s first portable device to offset gravity using electricity. This isn’t the only levitating home gizmo we’ve caught wind of either. The Air Bonsai is a similar product billed to lift bonsai trees artfully above table tops.
Aside from the initial wow factor, the practical uses of the LevitatingCup aren’t immediately clear. For instance it remains to be seen whether customers will be able to use their own glassware with the LevitatingCup system. Another question is just how stable the LevitatingCup will be, especially in the often raucous environs of packed clubs and eateries.

Hopefully glasses will float but stay put.
LevitatingCUP
Still, the visionaries responsible for dreaming up the LevitatingCup concept are undeterred and have imagined potential follow-up products. These include ideas for a LevitatingPlate and LevitatingPillow along with a variety of colored electromagnetic bases for extra customization.
Interested? Check out the associated Kickstarter project. Backers supposedly will be able to get their hands on a LevitatingCup as early as October of 2016. Prices are expected to start at $179 for a wired base with wireless models costing more.
GE GTW810SSJWS review – CNET
The Good GE’s GTW810SSJWS washing machine looks nice, is simple to use, and offers a lot of features considering its $900 price.
The Bad It doesn’t do a great job removing stains, and the Connect Plus accessory is less convenient than a washer that’s already Wi-Fi enabled.
The Bottom Line The GE GTW810SSJWS has a lot to offer, but its disappointing performance makes it hard to recommend.
Complete with a large 5.1 cubic-foot capacity, 13 cleaning cycles and a see-through lid, GE’s GTW810SSJWS already offers more than your average top-load washer. But that’s not all: This model is also compatible with an optional $49 Connect Plus accessory. With this Wi-Fi add-on, you have access to the GE Laundry app for Android and iOS, as well as GE’s new IFTTT channel for connecting to Philips Hue bulbs and other smart home devices. The beauty here is that the whole app-enabled bit is entirely opt-in, so you aren’t paying a premium for Wi-Fi access you may not need or want.
This washer looks nice too, is easy to use, and costs just $900 ($1,000 if you want the gray metallic finish instead of white). Unfortunately, it didn’t do particularly well when we tested its stain-removal power. So despite its high-end-ish lineup of features, I can’t readily recommend this washer.
Hidden features make this GE washer smart
See full gallery





1 – 5 of 9
Next
Prev
Taking a closer look
$900 is a decidedly midrange price for a top-load washing machine. But GE’s GTW810SSJWS has some features that put it in the realm of premium models like GE’s own $1,200 GTW860SPJMC and the $1,199 Samsung WA52J8700.
Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the three washers:
| GE GTW810SSJWS | GE GTW860SPJMC | Samsung WA52J8700 |
| $900 | $1,200 | $1,199 |
| White, Metallic (for $1,000) | Metallic, White (for $1,100) | Stainless Platinum |
| 5.1 cubic feet | 5.1 cubic feet | 5.2 cubic feet |
| 13 | 13 | 15 |
| 152 kWh/year | 152 kWh/year | 165 kWh/year |
| 28 inches x 44.5 inches x 29 inches | 28 inches x 44.5 inches x 29 inches | 27 inches x 46 inches x 29.3 inches |
| 1 year, limited | 1 year, limited | 1 year, limited |
| 120V 60Hz | 120V 60Hz | 120V 60Hz |
| Yes, Android and iPhone | Yes, Android and iPhone | No |

Screenshot by CNET
The takeaway here is that the GTW810SSJWS and the pricier GTW860SPJMC are the same in terms of basic specs and features. And aside from the premium 860 model’s auto-dispensing detergent reservoir, the only other obvious difference is that the 860 already has built-in Wi-Fi capabilities, whereas the 810 model doesn’t.
Specifically, you have to buy a separate Connect Plus gizmo, available for $49 on this GE site to give the GTW810SSJWS Wi-Fi connectivity. But it’s pretty simple. Use the included Ethernet cable to plug Connect Plus into the Ethernet port on the back of the washer, download the GE Laundry app, and follow the steps to connect.
After that, you’ll be able to view the status of your current laundry cycle on your washer — and any compatible GE dryers — remotely. You’ll also have access to GE’s new laundry-specific IFTTT channel that links compatible washers like the GTW810SSJWS (if you have the Connect Plus accessory, that is) to smart home products from other manufacturers. I connected the washer to a Philips Hue BR30 downlight so that the LED blinked whenever a wash cycle ended; it worked consistently well.
Meizu MX6 Release Date, Price and Specs – CNET
Chinese smartphone Meizu maker may not be well-known outside of its homeland, but the company has got its fans in China, thanks to its iPhone-inspired designs for its products. And on first glance, it’s obvious the Meizu MX6, launched earlier this week in Beijing, shares striking similarities with Apple’s iPhone.
That said, the Meizu phone does have its own differences. For one, the rear 12-megapixel camera is located in the middle, which makes it less likely your finger will accidentally block your shot compared with the iPhone. Another thing going for it is that unlike other Android phones, the MX6 doesn’t have the usual back and recent apps button.
Meizu’s MX6 offers plenty of familiarity
See full gallery




1 – 4 of 8
Next
Prev
Instead, the home button, which also serves as a fingerprint scanner, also acts as the back button with a simple double-touch of the button. You might be confused what I mean about double-touch — instead of pressing down on the button like you do the iPhone, you just need to touch the button quickly twice. It takes a while to get, but once you do, it’s actually quite easy to navigate the Meizu FlyMe OS, which is a customized version of Android 6.0.

The Meizu MX6’s rear camera is located in a more central location compared to the Apple iPhone.
Aloysius Low/CNET
I do like the design of FlyMe. Meizu has put in plenty of effort to make the UI design stand out compared to other Chinese Android skins and it shows. Each icon gets its own good-looking flat look. The end result is a UI that matches the iPhone-ish looks and could be something Apple wouldn’t mind having in its own phones.
Overall, the build and quality of the MX6 impresses, and I think the phone has what it takes to do well. And with 3.2 million preregistrations for the phone before it even goes on sale, it looks like plenty of Chinese fans think the same thing, too. The phone will go on sale in China on July 30 for 1,999 yuan (which converts to around $300, £225 or AU$400) and will be available globally through third-party online vendors soon.
What you need to know
- Deca-core (10) Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20
- 5.5-inch full-HD display
- FlyMe 5.2 OS on top of Android 6.0 Marshmallow
- Comes in gray, silver, gold and rose gold
- 4GB RAM, 32GB onboard storage
- USB Type-C, fingerprint scanner
- 3,060mAh battery
Alcatel Idol 4s review
Alcatel made some noise last year with the release of the OneTouch Idol 3 as an affordable and attractive package that caught the eye of consumers. The OneTouch Idol 3 was very much a budget-friendly mid-range smartphone, but while its Alcatel may have dropped the OneTouch branding with its successor, the Idol 4S improves on it by offering better specs at an equally affordable price tag. On paper, the smartphone definitely looks the part, but does it deliver?
With a few tweaks since the version we saw at MWC, is the Idol 4S a smash hit or does it fail to live up to the hype of its predecessor? Let’s find out in this, our Alcatel Idol 4S review.
Design
After what can only be dubbed a successful 2015, Alcatel is attempting to progress with its smartphone offering, and the Idol 4S comes wrapped in a build that is beautifully designed and far more premium in nature when compared to last year’s product.
Thanks to its glass-meets-metal construction and the contours of the edges, the Idol 4S reminds us of recent Samsung flagships, yet it doesn’t have the refinement of the Galaxy S7. Instead, it has the same rough edges that the Galaxy S6 did, and it’s definitely very nice to hold in the phone.

What makes it a little rough are some of the design choices, in particular the boom key. One of the key features of the Idol 4S, this has some unique features – more on that below – but is designed like and placed where a power button normally would be, which is odd at best.
Where’s the power button we hear you ask? Well it’s in the upper left corner and this means you’re always having to use your index button to operate it. In fact, if Alcatel were to offer the ability to swap these two buttons around, the Idol 4S would be a more appealing smartphone.

As we mentioned at the top, the Idol 4S has had a few tweaks since Mobile World Congress, and the release version actually sports a fingerprint sensor on the back. The sensor works well enough – when you can find it that is – but as it’s not recessed, it can be very difficult to locate immediately. Alcatel is including free cases as part of the Idol 4S bundle and these help to differentiate the fingerprint sensor from the rest of the smartphone.
Without doubt, audio is becoming a very important part of today’s smartphone experience and the Idol 4S doesn’t skimp in this department, with two front-facing 3.6-watt JBL certified speakers. The audio is powerful and sounds clean, and considering the price, are definitely very impressive.
Overall, the Idol 4S is certainly an impressively-designed smartphone and the switch to a glass-meets-metal design by Alcatel has proven itself to be a worthy successor. It’s not perfect, and needs a little refinement, but the design is definitely a plus.
Display

Last year’s Idol 3 offered Full HD resolution but this year, Alcatel have gone one step further by procuring a 5.5-inch Quad HD Super AMOLED panel from Samsung that certainly looks the part at first glance.
The display definitely increases the appeal of the device and with a max brightness of over 600 nits, it’s one of the brightest on the market. However, the screen is on the cooler side with its 7500 K color temperature and tends to produce saturated, unrealistic colors.
It’s not necessarily a bad thing but it’s also not entirely accurate, but it’s a minor quibble with what is otherwise a rather impressive display. You get the standard vivid colors and deep, vibrant blacks offered by a Samsung Super AMOLED panel – likely from a couple of years ago – without having to pay a large amount for it.
Hardware & Performance

Under the hood is where the Idol 4S seems to have had cutbacks, at least on paper. Powered by a Snapdragon 652 processor with 3GB of RAM and an Adreno 510 GPU, the Idol 4S doesn’t quite appear to be on a par with devices like the Axon 7 and Xiaomi Mi 5 which all offer the newest Snapdragon 820 processor at a similar price point.
The Snapdragon 652 is comprised of a quad-core 1.8GHz Cortex-A72 chipset and a quad-core 1.4GHz Cortex-A3 chipset, both arranged in a big.LITTLE formation. The Snapdragon 652 SoC does hold up under most conditions but it certainly isn’t on the same level as the Snapdragon 820 and as such, you can expect to find a few glitches in performance during resource intensive tasks such as gaming. For day-to-day general usage, the Snapdragon 652 is more than capable and it definitely goes the full mile.

32GB storage also comes as standard on the Idol 4S and out of the box, you’ll have around 24GB available to use. Luckily, this can be expanded using the inclusive microSD card slot – which replaces the second SIM card slot – and lets you increase the storage by up to 256GB, although we don’t recommend using a card that’s full as read times can be particularly painful.
Call quality is surprisingly great with this smartphone. The volume output is pretty strong through the earpiece and also on speakerphone, but it’s made better with the clear tone of its quality. Voices have strong emphasis, which makes it even a breeze to chit chat when there’s some ambient noise around.
Elsewhere, other notable hardware features include Hi-Fi Audio through the excellent speakers, microUSB v2.0 (no USB-C here sadly), compatibility with Alcatel’s VR Googles and the usual plethora of connectivity options including dual-band Wi-Fi ac, Bluetooth 4.2, NFC and support for all US LTE bands (2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 17). If you need an affordable unlocked phone that works across GSM networks in the US, the Idol 4S certainly meets this requirement.
Battery

Under the hood, the Idol 4S is powered by a 3,000mAh non-removable battery that is quoted as offering up to two-days battery life. In general usage, the Idol 4S gets to 1.5 days with ease and with minimal usage, you can eek out two days with the device. For the most demanding users, it should be able to get through a full day’s usage.
For the times when your device is running low, the Idol 4S offers quick charging and can be charged to full in just under 90 minutes or to 60% in just 30 minutes. It’s not the fastest charging on the market but it is on par with most major current flagships. Overall, the battery isn’t the absolute best but firmly ranks as better-than-average and for the price point, is certainly impressive.
Camera

The improvements from Idol 3 to Idol 4S don’t end there as the camera also gets a welcome bump, with a new 16MP rear Sony sensor with f/2.0 aperture, phase detection autofocus and a dual-LED dual tone flash.


The camera produces details that are sufficient and colors tend to be rich in tone, but the Idol 4S struggles with dynamic range, as brighter areas tend to be overexposed. HDR does go someway to solving this problem which adjusts the exposure throughout the range but tends to make the photo appear a bit artificial.
For the most part, the camera is certainly capable and on par with others in this range but it’s not the greatest smartphone shooter and tends to be a little hit-and-miss. The lack of OIS proves to be a costly miss as shoots in both low light and day light can appear to be noisy.
In most low light conditions, the Idol 4S camera does struggle and pictures come out noisy and more susceptible to blurring. The auto-focus doesn’t quite nail exposure in low light photos but manually selecting the focal point can help find the right exposure for better low light images.
Overall, the camera certainly isn’t the best in an affordable flagship but it’s more than functional. While it mostly gets the job done, it’s worth noting that other devices do offer a better camera experience at a similar price point.
Software

The Idol 4S runs Android Marshmallow with a few of Alcatel’s UX flourishes on top and for the most part, it’s one of the more pleasant interfaces on the market. By trying to remain faithful to the stock experience, the Idol 4S UX endears itself to purists and customizers alike.
Basic users will appreciate the simplicity and straightforwardness it offers, but power users will find themselves wanting more as the Idol 4S doesn’t quite have the feature set of a power-user-friendly OEM interface like Samsung’s TouchWiz.









The simplest way to describe the Idol 4S software experience is that it is very much one-step-at-a-time; while other interfaces do offer robust multitasking and are optimised for doing multiple things at once, the Idol 4S takes a more simplistic approach. It gets the job done… for the average consumer.
On the team, both Nirave and I have the Idol 4S and neither of us finds the boom key particularly useful. In truthful honesty, if the Idol 4S didn’t have a boom key, we wouldn’t be too upset and hence Alcatel allowing users to swap the functions of the power and boom keys would help improve the overall experience.
Specifications
| Display | 5.5-inch AMOLED display 1440 x 2560 |
| Processor | Octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 processor |
| RAM | 3GB |
| Storage | 32GB of on-board storage |
| MicroSD expansion | Yes, up to 512GB |
| Cameras | 16MP rear camera 8MP front camera |
| Battery | 3000mAh |
| SIM type | Nano SIM |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct, NFC, Micro USB 2.0, Bluetooth 4.2 |
| Software | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| Dimensions | 153.9 x 75.4 x 6.99mm |
Gallery
Price

The Idol 4S may not be the perfect smartphone but it does deliver in several departments and considering the price, it’s definitely a worth contender in the affordable flagship battle.
When launched stateside, the Idol 4S will come as part of a bundle that includes Virtual Reality Goggles, JBL headphones in the box (which are very, very good), a screen protector and a free case from Incipio and at a pre-order price of $349.99, the Idol 4S is definitely great value for money.
If you choose not to pre-order the handset and instead wait for it to go on sale, it’ll cost you $399.99 and at this price, it’s still a very good purchase but it is in the range of slightly better handsets such as the ZTE Axon 7. Overall though, the Idol 4S is definitely a purchase we recommend though.
Conclusion

So there you have it, our in-depth review of the Alcatel Idol 4S and it’s clear that Alcatel has certainly made some huge strides since the Idol 3. In a bid to create an excellent smartphone that is still affordable, Alcatel did have to cut a few corners but this is to be expected and for the most part, it doesn’t quite detract away from the experience.
It’s always worth remembering that Alcatel isn’t just selling a phone here and instead, they’re selling a bundled experience. At the price of $400, the Idol 4S goes head to head with the likes of the Axon 7 and the OnePlus 3 and for the most part, it very much splits these two devices.
Last year’s starting price of $250 for the Idol 3 was undeniably head turning but at $400, the Idol 4S is tougher to like. That’s not to say we don’t; the affordable flagship market is ever increasingly competitive and the Idol 4S is definitely a worthy contender for this title.
What do you think of the Idol 4S and do you plan to buy one? If not, which handset would you buy? Is a big bundle enough to make you part with your money? Let us know your views in the comments below!
Moto Z and Moto Z Force (DROID) review
Moto is back with another iteration of their flagship line, moving from X, jumping Y, and going straight to Z. With a couple of tricks up its sleeve and parent company Lenovo plainly strewn on its box, is this the next innovation in smartphones? Let’s find out in our comprehensive review of the Moto Z and Moto Z Force.
- Just add Mods: Moto Z and Z Force (Droid Edition) unboxing
- What exactly is modularity and is the Moto Z really modular?
- Moto Z and Moto Z Force hands on
We are dealing with two different versions of Moto’s new flagship device, but the differences are not vast, nor are there many. With that in mind, we will mention where the differences are and comment on them where applicable.
Buy the Moto Z Now!
Buy the Moto Z Force (Droid Edition) Now!
Design
The Moto Z Force is the larger of the two devices, with a couple of more millimeters of thickness and a significant increase in heft. While it packs a little bit more in its body as a result, credit goes to Motorola for making one of the thinnest devices out there in the Moto Z proper, with it being only about 5 mm thick, and weighing less than plenty of devices that have similarly sized screens.
A textured power button is easy to find, and is low enough on the phone for easy access. Though the flatter Moto Z is smoother all around the sides, the extra heft adds a chamfer on the Z Force. You may also notice that there is only one port on the phone, the USB-C type connector that sits alone, without there being a headphone jack.

Overall, there’s something very Lenovo-esque about these new Motos, which isn’t all that surprising, but is definitely noticeable. The all metal bodies have a distinct shine that is both eye-catching, and magnets for fingerprints. Also, the silver-lined camera package really sticks out, something that is once again eye-catching, but not particularly ideal, we think. While some might like these less subtle changes to the Moto formula, others will probably prefer to employ the included remedy.

Magnets at the top and lower thirds of the backing are accompanied by connector pins, and the Moto Mods use these to attach and connect. From a purely design-focused perspective, this is how Moto Covers can be slapped onto the back of the phones. There are also, of course, the Moto Mods, but we’ll get to them later. A dark wooden Cover came with our devices, but plenty will be made available to add further customization. It covers up the fingerprint-heavy backing, covers up the connectors, and makes the camera flush. We wouldn’t be surprised if users put their Cover on and said, “that’s more like it.”
The covers add about 30 grams of weight to these devices, making the Moto Z feel more conventional, and the Moto Z Force feel like a brick. There are a couple advantages to having the Moto Z Force however, like the larger battery, and the mere fact that when a phone is that heavy, it feels more secure in the hand. Overall handling with these 5.5-inch screens is about where one would expect, though a large bezel at the top and bottom portions of the phones can make reaching up and down a bit tough.

As you may learn in this review, there are a lot of ideas and a lot of roving parts to the Moto Z packages. They do seem more like Lenovo devices than before, but with that canvas comes a lot of room for possibilities.
Display

Both phones come with a 5.5-inch AMOLED display with a Quad HD resolution, resulting in a pixel density of 535 ppi. As far as displays go, there is little to complain about here, especially considering the higher saturation that AMOLED provides. Colors all look good, but can be toned down for users who find it a little too much. Text is easy to read and media consumption is enjoyable across the board, especially in our time playing games like Final Fantasy 7 and Pokemon Go.
The Moto Z Force, however, does come with the Moto ShatterShield, which keeps the display safe from cracks and shattering due to accidental drops. It is a multi-layer system that adds that little bit of protection, and so, even if this phone isn’t all that rugged, it will withstand a bit more than your average phone.

One returning feature from previous Moto devices is the Moto Display, which is an ambient display that allows for quick looks at notifications, and certain actions to be performed upon them. A sensor at the top of the device brings up the information, at which time users can tap and hold on the circles in the middle, and either swipe up to wake the phone in the app or swipe down to dismiss it. It’s still a useful Moto feature that benefits from the AMOLED screen.
Performance

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 processor and the Adreno 530 GPU are at the helm of either device, providing the kind of performance any flagship should have. Even with the Verizon bloatware, the phone hasn’t skipped a beat and provides a smooth, snappy experience. Credit can also be given to the iteration of Android here, which is closer to stock Marshmallow than most other phone skins. For all accounts, apps performed without any drops and few stutters even when multitasking, which is helped along by the 4 GB of RAM.
Hardware

Before we get into the Moto Mods, let’s focus on what the phones already possess without any of those additions. Connections across the board are included, and both phones benefit from Verizon’s network. Though these phones might only be available on the CDMA Verizon network, at least for now, it is pretty well known that Verizon is one of the fastest and most reliable networks. That doesn’t much help the pain of waiting for GSM capable versions of these phones coming to the US, however.
32 GB or 64 GB are the on-board storage options that are available, but microSD cards, allowing for up to an additional 256 GB, can help make sure that you never run out of space.

The fingerprint reader found below the display is a great performer. It is easy to set up, and responds in no time. It’s an easy way of waking and unlocking the device, as always, but there is an extra function programmed into it as well. By holding down on that area while in the phone, the phone will lock. This is a nice touch, no pun intended. It took some time for us to stop pressing the sensor because it seems like a home button, but it is hard not to when the on-screen navigation keys slide out of view in certain full screen situations.

Audio is a bit of a mixed bag with the Motos, but it starts off on a good note during calls. There are 4 microphones strewn about the device, and all of them help not only with the Moto Voice activations, but outbound audio on calls end up sounding really clear. Inbound sound is also good, though the speaker on these phones is found in the earpiece, anyway. That said, the speaker benefits from being front facing, but there isn’t a particularly loud or rich sound coming out of it.

Which brings us to what has already been a polarizing detail in this new line of Motos, the lack of a headphone jack, which might end up being a hard adjustment to make for some. As prevalent as Bluetooth may be, it isn’t everyone’s ideal solution for audio playback. An adapter from USB-C to headphone jack is included in the box to help this transition, but even then it is another piece of kit that could easily be lost in a bag, or just lost in general. It might be easier to just keep the adapter connected to the headphones at all times. Even then, what if one wants to listen to content and charge the phone at the same time? That all said, the listening experience is still fairly standard, and is not any better or worse than most other phones. It’s good that there is a way to still use existing headphones, but this is a change that will take some time to normalize.

The Moto Z Force has the larger battery at 3,500 mAh, while the thinner Moto Z fits a 2,600 mAh unit. Battery life has been, for the most part, pretty decent. With pretty heavy usage days that included camera usage, YouTube viewing, and gaming, the Moto Z was able to give me about 3 and a half hours of screen on time while the Z Force managed close to 5 hours. The Z Force was able to go a full day without making me feel antsy, but the Moto Z would just barely make it after the power saving mode kicked in at 15%.
Thankfully, powering up doesn’t take much time at all. There is a trade-off between both of these phones, in that the Moto Z comes with a 15 W charger, while the Z Force has a more powerful 30 W charger. Both are USB-C chargers that are tethered to the bricks, meaning that one has to use them in order to achieve the very fast charging times that Motorola claim. They are indeed fast, as I was able to get to 50% of battery in half an hour, using the correct chargers for either phone.

Further, if you are really hurting for battery, the Moto Mods will help. These are Moto’s move into the future of smartphones, and while this is not quite modularity, it is easy to throw that term around with these phones. Instead, we will keep to just calling them mods, easily connected to the back of the phone via the magnets.

A more in-depth look at the three Moto Mods currently available can be found here, but for now it should be fairly obvious that the most useful of the bunch is the Incipio OffGrid Power Mod. This 2,200 mAh capacity battery slaps right on, and essentially makes the Moto Z a 4,800 mAh phone, and the Moto Z Force a 5,700 mAh device. Power is drained either regularly to keep the phone as charged as possible, or in an Efficiency Mode, that does enough to keep the phone at 80%. In terms of screen on time, these batteries got me about another hour, to and hour and a half, when slapped onto the phone at single digit percentages.
The other two Moto Mods are the Insta-Share projector add-on and the JBL SoundBoost speaker. In a nutshell, they are definitely convenient, and make the Moto Z family quite fun to use, but are still lesser performers than standalone solutions, like a Bluetooth speaker or a separate Pico projector. Also, they are quite expensive, especially the projector.

If modularity, and in this case, mods, are the future of smartphone experiences, then Motorola have done a great job in showing us a functional, accessible, and most of all fun way of doing it. They require no changes in the hardware or software of the device, and are quite literally the definition of plug and play, or rather, attach and play. The battery case is the most practical of them all, but we hope to see even more good ideas become reality in the world of Moto Mods.
Camera

Differences between the Moto Z and Moto Z Force start with the battery and essentially end with the cameras. The Z Force has the more powerful camera, with a 21 MP shooter, while the Moto Z proper utilizes a 13 MP sensor. Pretty much everything else remains the same, including the f/1.8 apertures, the inclusions of OIS and laser autofocus, and secondary cameras that are 5 MP, with wide angles of view and f/2.2 apertures.

The apps are fairly simple to use and don’t get too much in the way of the user, unless you get into the Professional Mode, where toggles and sliders can get a little out of hand pretty quickly. When in the regular modes, it is simply a matter of tapping on a subject to put it in focus, shifting the exposure slider accordingly, and snapping. The conjunctive team of contrast, phase detection, and laser autofocus, ensure that focusing on subjects is quick and easy. A very small delay will occur if HDR is being used, but even then, the camera app is snappy and responsive.




Before we get into the analysis, we should mention that the different megapixel counts basically mean that the Moto Z Force captures more detail overall. As you can see in the pictures, cropping into the same areas simply means that there is more data in the 21 MP photos, which isn’t a surprise. Thankfully, shooting modes, video modes, and general processing all remain the same, so the cameras aren’t so different that the gap of choice between them turns out huge.




We start off with self portraits, which include a Beautification mode, which is a first for Moto, but not a first for Lenovo at large. It mainly enhances clarity and colors while smoothing out lines on the face, to varying degrees of success. A front-facing flash makes a welcome return, and proves useful for darker situations or when you need to lighten up your face in front of a bright backdrop.

Modes on the main cameras include 4K video recording, which benefits from the optical image stabilization and some software stabilization, that results in somewhat unnatural looking movements. It seems like the video mode supports the panorama mode too, as the viewfinder seems to go into a similar mode, so the user simply has to sweep across the landscape. Panorama on the Moto Z phones, then, is actually really easy to do, but suffers in lower light situations due to the required slow shutter speeds used to provide adequate exposure.




HDR can be on auto when shooting in the normal photo mode, and it does a good job of enhancing the photo. The effect is pretty noticeable in the heightened shadows, the higher clarity, and the punched up colors. Especially when used in the right situations, HDR here is a viable tool.
Moto Z camera samples
Overall, pictures look pretty good with accurate colors, meaning that the saturation is not really overdone. The majority of pictures keep from looking too dull, but if a bit more punch is needed, throwing on the HDR mode is always an option. We notice a bit of noise reduction happening, making the finer lines of a photo look quite smudged out, especially in low light situations. However, taken as they are ,and especially in bright situations, the pictures that come out of the Moto Z and Z Force are pretty pleasing to the eye. In dark situations, it can be rather difficult to get a sharp picture, because the night shooting mode requires a very steady hand with the shutter being open for longer periods of time.
Moto Z Force camera samples
A steady hand will go a long way to making low light shots better, but in all other situations, the Moto Z line does a good job at being a pocket photography companion
Software

On the software side of things, we have Android 6.0 Marshmallow powering this version of Android, and thankfully, Moto keeps their version pretty close to stock. That basically means that all of the basics are there, with any Moto extras found when you dig deep enough. Contrary to how some other OEM skins tend to be, the additions in this version of Android are really useful.
Moto features are found in the app drawer, under an app called Moto. This is where users can toggle and customize the Moto Actions, Display, and Voice. There are a number of different gestures that can be used, including a double chop to easily activate the flashlight, and a double twist motion that opens the camera app. There is also a gesture to make the entire display easier to navigate with one hand.

We already mentioned Moto Display, where a minimal ambient display will show notifications and music controls that can be utilized even when the phone is locked. Users can also add dark hours to the Moto Display, typically to when there is no need for it.
Finally, there is the Moto Voice, the customizable way of getting the phone to unlock and go straight into a Google Voice Search. Setting it up requires a quiet room and a few repetitions of the recorded phrase, but in the end it is a great way to get a search done on the phone from start to finish, just using one’s voice. More syllables mean that typical speech patterns won’t accidentally trigger Moto Voice. You might remember that I used the phrase “X, activate” on my Moto X. Well, with the Moto Z, I use the phrase “Zero, help me out.”

Moto manages to keep the good times rolling in their version of Android that will undoubtedly satisfy Android purists, but will also please those who need a little more from their operating systems. This is because the Moto additions are useful but generally are out of the way.
Specifications
| Display | 5.5-inch AMOLED display Quad HD resolution, 535 ppi |
5.5-inch AMOLED display Quad HD resolution, 535 ppi |
| Processor | 2.15 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 Adreno 530 GPU |
2.15 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 Adreno 530 GPU |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 32/64 GB expandable via microSD up to 256 GB |
32/64 GB expandable via microSD up to 256 GB |
| Camera | 13 MP rear camera, f/1.8 aperture, OIS, dual LED flash 5 MP front-facing camera |
21 MP rear camera, f/1.8 aperture, OIS, dual LED flash 5 MP front-facing camera |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Bluetooth 4.1 GPS + GLONASS NFC USB Type-C 1.0 |
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Bluetooth 4.1 GPS + GLONASS NFC USB Type-C 1.0 |
| Battery | 2,600 mAh | 3,500 mAh |
| Software | Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| Dimensions | 153.3 x 75.3 x 5.2 mm 136 grams |
155.9 x 75.8 x 7 mm 163 grams |
Gallery
Moto Z
Moto Z Force
Pricing and final thoughts
The Moto Z and Moto Z Force DROIDs are available only on Verizon, for the full prices of $624 and $720, respectively. Monthly payments using Verizon’s financing put the Moto Z at $26 a month and the Z Force at $30 a month.

While we hope that the new Motos are eventually made available unlocked and/or GSM compatible, there is one undeniable fact: if you are on Verizon, this is the phone to beat. Despite changes to the overall Moto formula, the aspects that made previous Moto X devices great are found here in one way or another.
Adding the Moto Mods brings versatility, and if the mods continue to bring convenient but useful features, the packages of the Moto Z and Moto Z Force can be really hard to pass up. As phones on their own, the new Motos are still worthy of their flagship designation, boasting every feature that a high-end device should have, and the user experience that can prove reliable on the daily.
- Just add Mods: Moto Z and Z Force (Droid Edition) unboxing
- What exactly is modularity and is the Moto Z really modular?
- Moto Z and Moto Z Force hands on
What do you think of the Lenovo-made Motorola Moto Z and Z Force? Do you plan to buy one or both of them and what about Motorola’s exclusivity deal with Verizon? Let us know your views in the comments below!
Buy the Moto Z Now!
Buy the Moto Z Force (Droid Edition) Now!
iOS 10 changes how you unlock iPhone – here’s how to switch it back
This is exactly why Apple lets you test unfinished versions of iOS updates.
A couple of weeks ago, iOS 10, Apple’s next major update to iOS, became available as a public beta, allowing intrepid iPhone/iPad owners to sample the software and give feedback. The idea behind this is that, with the help of your feedback, Apple could stomp out bugs before giving iOS 10 a wide release this autumn. For most consumers, there is little reason to upgrade when the finished product is only a few months away, but there are some benefits to upgrading now. Early adopters, for instance, can get a head start on using new features.
One such feature in iOS 10 is a reimagining of the lock screen experience. Here’s what you need to know about that: Apple changed how the Touch ID sensor works when unlocking your iPhone, with the purpose of stopping you from flying past all the notifications that have stacked up on your lock screen since the last time you used your iPhone. Apple wants you to actually stop and use this space, rather than simply skip past it when unlocking your device. But the new change might put a cramp into your daily workflow.
For years you’ve been unlocking your iPhone the same way. It’s burned into your muscle memory. When Apple rolled out the first beta for iOS 10, it suddenly change this years-old habit. Well, the company must have collected a tonne of negative feedback from the public, because with the second beta of iOS 10 that released on 20 July, Apple included a setting that lets you revert back to the old way of doing things. Apple could remove this new setting before iOS 10 is finished, but for now, here’s how to switch back.
How do you unlock iPhone in iOS 10?
Ever since Touch ID was introduced you had to place your finger on the home button – without pressing – to unlock and open your iPhone (or you could use the “slide to unlock” gesture). Simple, right?
Well, in the first public beta of iOS 10, all that changed.
Apple not only got rid of “slide to unlock” but also made it so Touch ID worked entirely different when unlocking your device. With iOS 10, using Touch ID will still unlock your iPhone, but it won’t immediately open it for instant access to your Home screen and apps. Instead, you have to scan your finger to unlock your iPhone, and then press the home button to open it up.
Don’t worry about feeling like a luddite if you’ve been trying to embrace the change and can’t seem to get used to the new way of unlocking your device. The new setup is extremely clunky.
Thankfully, Apple has “fixed” the issue in its latest release.
How can you switch back to the old way of unlocking iPhone?
Apple appears to have acknowledged that the initial change in iOS 10 was a mistake, because in the second public beta of iOS 10, it has offered a way to make the Touch ID sensor work as it did under iOS 9. If you’re running iOS 10 Beta 3 or Public Beta 2, you can enable a new setting called “Rest Finger to Open” in order to switch back to the old way of doing things. Go to Settings > General > Accessibility > Home Button.
Is that it?
Yep. Now continue testing iOS 10 and submitting feedback. If you want more information about how to join Apple’s public beta testing program and get iOS 10 up and running on your iPhone today, refer to Pocket-lint’s step-by-step guide.
- How to get iOS 10 right now and get it working on your iPhone and iPad
- Apple iOS 10 lock screen: What’s new and how does it work?
- iOS 10 Messages explained: What’s new and how you’ll use it
Apple’s electric car might not hit the streets until 2021
Apple’s electric car initiative, dubbed ‘Project Titan,’ has been sort of an open secret for awhile now — but how close the company is to actually releasing a vehicle is anybody’s guess. Initial reports pegged 2019 as Apple’s foray into the automotive industry. Some sources predicted the first cars to roll off the line in 2020. Today, that presumptive launch date gets pushed back just one more year: according to The Information, we may not see an Apple car until 2021.
This new target date reportedly comes from an employee who was only briefly working with the Project Titan team — though during their time on the project, the delivery goal was apparently pushed from 2020 to 2021. The comment was presented as an aside in a profile piece on three brothers who worked on the project, but a delay wouldn’t be out of the question. Earlier this year, the Project Titan’s leader left Apple for personal reasons, and analysts have been wondering how the departure might effect the project’s timeline. Even so, we still don’t know when we’ll see an Apple vehicle on the road. At least not until the folks in Cupertino decide to speak up.
Via: 9to5Mac
Source: The Information
Police get dead man’s finger 3D-printed to unlock his phone
Michigan State University professor Anil Jain’s work focuses on how to make biometric signifiers like facial recognition as difficult to hack into as possible. But when police approached him to break into someone’s phone, they didn’t want backdoor access around security measures — they wanted him to 3D-print a dead man’s finger to get into his smartphone.
According to Fusion, the ongoing investigation prevented Jain from sharing specific details, but the digest version is that the police suspect foul play and the dead man’s phone might provide clues to his suspected killer. Since the police happened to have taken his fingerprints when he was alive (he’d been previously arrested), they gave them to Jain to make 3D-printed versions of all ten digits.
But since touch sensors are capacitive and require living skin to disrupt the electrical surface, Jain covered the mock fingers with a thin layer of metallic particles to trick the phone. That’s the theory, anyway: Jain and his PhD student still have a few weeks to refine the printed digits before they hand them off to the police.
While using a dead person’s fingerprint to break into their own phone sidesteps the hassle of forcing phone makers to allow access, it’s also legally uncertain. In this case, though, the subject is neither the criminal suspect nor alive to dispute police action.
“The Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination. Here, the fingerprints are of the deceased victim, not the murder suspect. Obviously, the victim is not at risk of incrimination,” security and law researcher Bryan Choi told Fusion.
But for living suspects, a legal standard hasn’t been set to decide whether police can force folks to unlock their own phones using their fingerprints. One Los Angeles court just required a suspect in an FBI case to open her device that way back in May, but it’s still unclear whether such legal force violates a person’s Fifth Amendment right not to self-incriminate. Doing so could be interpreted as equivalent to testifying.
Source: Fusion



