Skip to content

Archive for

21
Jul

Scientists can build lab tools using these Lego-like blocks


A team of University of California, Riverside researchers designed a special set of 3D-printed Lego-like bricks. Unlike normal Lego that serves as building blocks for toys and gadgets, their bricks can be used to make custom instruments for labs, schools and hospitals. They call them Multifluidic Evolutionary Components (MECs), and just like a Lego set, they’re comprised of different parts that make it possible to build tools for different tasks, such as pumping fluids and taking measurements.

Lead researcher Douglas Hill was inspired by his time in the electronics industry, where components are designed to work with each other. Hill was apparently “shocked to find out that bioengineers build new instruments from scratch” and can take months or even years to finish. That’s why he created something that make it possible to build affordable apparatuses on the fly.

Select undergrad students in the university have been testing the system for a while. William Grover, a team member and assistant professor of bioengineering in UCR, said they’ve “had computer science students write the code that runs the blocks, bioengineering students culture cells using instruments built from the blocks, and even art students design the graphical interface for the software that controls the blocks.” The researchers plan to give two California school districts access to their creation as part of their pilot testing. Their long-term goal, however, is to make the blocks more affordable and accessible to any kind of organization or institute that needs them.

Via: Gizmodo

Source: University of California Riverside, PLOS One

21
Jul

Take a look at how ‘No Man’s Sky’ handles combat


In the almost three years since we first saw No Man’s Sky, gameplay videos and previews have focused mostly on its exploration and survival aspects. Now, mere weeks ahead of its PlayStation 4 launch, we’re getting a better look at how the game earns its “fantasy violence” descriptor from the Entertainment Software Ratings Board. The clip embedded above focuses on combat not only in outer space against armadas of ships, but also the various procedurally generated (and dangerous) creatures on the planets you’ll galavant around.

It’s the second in a four-part series, with clips for the game’s trading and survival aspects coming next week and the following. Keeping the videos on repeat is certainly one way to make the wait for August 9th feel a little shorter, but I can’t say that I recommend doing so.

Source: PlayStation (YouTube)

21
Jul

Apple Watch Remains Nearly Three Times as Popular as Samsung Smartwatches


The latest data from market research firm IDC reveals that Apple Watch sales totaled an estimated 1.6 million units in the second quarter, for an industry leading 47 percent market share, compared to Samsung’s estimated 600,000 smartwatch sales and 16 percent market share during the March-June period.

The numbers suggest that the Apple Watch remains nearly three times as popular as Samsung Gear smartwatches, nearly fifteen months after launching in the U.S. and eight other countries. Nevertheless, Samsung did close the gap with strong 51 percent year-over-year growth and a 9 point rise in market share.

IDC-smartwatch-sales-Q2-2016
Apple, meanwhile, experienced a 55 percent year-over-year decline, but the year-ago quarter encompassed the Apple Watch’s launch and is thereby an unfair comparison. Apple Watch market share has dropped substantially, however, from an estimated peak of 72 to 75 percent following its launch quarter.

Despite a down quarter, Apple remains far and away the market leader in smartwatches. Apple faces the same challenges as other OEMs, but the pure exposure of the device and brand through tactical marketing gives it a leg up on the competition. Watch 2.0, along with updates to watchOS, could help drive existing user refresh and more importantly, a new wave of first-time buyers.

The overall smartwatch market experienced its first-ever decline as shipments fell 32 percent in the second quarter, totaling an estimated 3.5 million units compared to an estimated 5.1 million units in the year-ago quarter. Lenovo, LG, and Garmin rounded off the top five smartwatch vendors in the second quarter, but the trio combined to sell only 700,000 units. All other vendors sold a combined 600,000 units.

KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said the so-called Apple Watch 2 will debut in the third quarter, setting the stage for a possible launch alongside the next iPhone in September. The next-generation Apple Watch could feature a FaceTime video camera, expanded Wi-Fi capabilities, cellular connectivity, and other internal upgrades, while new models and bands are always possibilities.

Related Roundups: Apple Watch, watchOS 2, watchOS 3
Tags: Samsung, IDC, smartwatch
Buyer’s Guide: Apple Watch (Caution)
Discuss this article in our forums

MacRumors-All?d=6W8y8wAjSf4 MacRumors-All?d=qj6IDK7rITs

21
Jul

Square Enix Launches Teaser Website for RPG Apple Watch Game ‘Cosmos Rings’


Final Fantasy creator Square Enix has launched a teaser website for a game made exclusively for the Apple Watch, called Cosmos Rings (via CNET). The website calls the game an “RPG for Apple Watch,” but leaves any other details about its mechanics, story, and launch date completely up in the air.

The sole teaser image for the game shows a screenshot of gameplay, with some kind of time dilation counter at the bottom left of the screen, along with a marker at the top left reminding players of the number of presumably in-game days that have passed while playing. Otherwise, the image doesn’t show much of what might be coming to the Apple Watch app.

The games market on Apple’s wearable device has plenty of room for creators to make a noticeable impression, since most users have yet to find any kind of killer app — even a non-gaming one — since the Apple Watch launched last year. A few gaming apps have managed to surge in popularity, focusing on mechanics that encourage short play styles, with incentive to revisit often, which may hint at Cosmos Rings’ potential gameplay.

Check out Square Enix’s website for yourself to see if you can discover any more clues behind Cosmos Rings.

Related Roundups: Apple Watch, watchOS 2, watchOS 3
Tags: Square Enix, Final Fantasy
Buyer’s Guide: Apple Watch (Caution)
Discuss this article in our forums

MacRumors-All?d=6W8y8wAjSf4 MacRumors-All?d=qj6IDK7rITs

21
Jul

BBC Launches ‘iPlayer Radio’ App in the U.S. App Store


BBC today released its iPlayer Radio app stateside, so American users on both iOS and Android can now tune in to BBC radio stations airing content from the United Kingdom (via TechCrunch). The iOS app launched in its native territory in 2012, with today marking the first time the company has expanded its app-based radio content to users outside of the U.K.

The iPlayer Radio app supports offline listening for BBC podcasts, curated selections of radio highlights for each user, and a daily schedule that makes sifting through the service’s content quick and easy. The app can even serve as an alarm clock to wake users up to a specific radio show, and conversely allow them to fall asleep without the worry of the app playing all night with “night mode.”

– Listen live to BBC Radio stations from the World Service and across the UK
– Catch up or listen again to your favourite BBC Radio programmes
– Download podcasts to enjoy anywhere, even when offline
– Browse and listen to carefully curated BBC Radio highlights and collections
– View daily schedules and categories quickly and easily
– Discover audio and video clips, including many live performances
– See what tracks are playing on air as well as track lists for on demand programmes
– Wake up to and doze off to BBC Radio with a built-in alarm clock and night mode

Those interested can download the BBC iPlayer Radio app for free from the iOS App Store today. [Direct Link]

Tags: BBC Radio, BBC iPlayer
Discuss this article in our forums

MacRumors-All?d=6W8y8wAjSf4 MacRumors-All?d=qj6IDK7rITs

21
Jul

Apple iPhone 7 Pro: Will it happen and what’s the story so far?


The rumour mill loves an Apple story. It doesn’t matter if it’s so far fetched it will never see the light of day, or whether it is something that might actually happen, it churns them all out anyway.

The latest claim isn’t for one iPhone to be announced in the latter half of this year, or even two, it’s for three. And no, we are not joking. These are all the rumours surrounding the iPhone 7 Pro.

We’ve separated them from the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus, which you can read about in our separate feature, but for those who want to know about the mysterious third device, keep reading.

Apple iPhone 7 Pro: Release date

The Apple iPhone 7 Pro is expected to debut at the same time as the rumoured iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus, which, if tradition is anything to go by should be September.

Last year, Apple held its iPhone event on the last day of consumer electronics show IFA, which was 9 September. This year’s show takes place from 2 to 7 September, suggesting we might see an Apple event within the first couple of weeks of September. 

A specific date has yet to be rumoured or officially announced but we will keep you posted as soon as we hear a peep.

Mac Fan

Apple iPhone 7 Pro: Design

Based on the rumours and the leaked images, it looks like the iPhone 7 Pro will sport a very similar design to the iPhone 7 Plus, but with the addition of a dual-camera setup and the Smart Connector found on the Pro line of iPads.

Japanese-site Mac Fan obtained some schematics for what it claims to be the iPhone 7 Pro, supporting the dual-camera setup and Smart Connector inclusion and a more recent image from Weibo showing all three devices also shows the claimed features.

The schematics show the device to measure 7.3mm, which is the same thickness as the iPhone 6S Plus, as well as what is reported for the iPhone 7 Plus. They also show a device with no headphone jack, which again is something rumoured for the iPhone 7 Plus and iPhone 7.

The image from Weibo showing the three rumoured iPhones side-by-side shows the iPhone 7 Pro and the iPhone 7 Plus to be the same size. All three devices have had their antenna strips moved to the top and bottom, revealing a more seamless metal body.

They also all have “S” underneath the iPhone at the bottom, supporting the rumours that their won’t be any significant design changes for the iPhone this year, including the retention of the protruding camera lens.

Weibo

Apple iPhone 7 Pro: Display

The Apple iPhone 7 Pro should feature the same size display as the iPhone 7 Plus if it arrives at all, and if the leaks are accurate. It’s worth bearing in mind that the iPhone 7 Plus and the iPhone 7 Pro could potentially be the same device.

Assuming for the sake of this feature that there will be a third iPhone model released in September however, rumours suggest it will be another 5.5-incher. That will put the 2016 iPhone line-up at four models, with a 4-inch, 4.7-inch and two 5.5-inch devices.

There haven’t been a great deal of rumours relating to the iPhone 7 Pro’s display specifically, but we can probably expect Apple’s force touch technology – 3D Touch – to be included again. The iPad Pro range offers added functionality in its display that allow them to work with the Apple Pencil but there has been nothing to suggest the iPhone 7 Pro will offer the same. If it did, we could be looking at a Note competitor.

Will Apple up the display resolution for the Pro model? Who knows. It’s not played the numbers game in the past but perhaps it will want to differentiate the Pro further than just the dual-camera and Smart Connector.

A 2K AMOLED display has been reported for the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus, which would suggest it will also come to the iPhone 7 Pro if it appears at all. A Quad HD resolution on a 5.5-inch display would put its pixel density at 543ppi, compared to the iPhone 6S Plus’s current 401ppi. A switch to AMOLED would also deliver a greater contrast ratio for brighter, punchier colours.

MacRumours / Bastille Post

Apple iPhone 7 Pro: Camera

As we mentioned, the Apple iPhone 7 Pro is rumoured to be coming with dual-cameras on the rear. Currently, it is not clear how the setup will work though. 

Apple could go down the same route as LG by featuring a standard lens coupled with a wide-angle lens, or it could go down Huawei’s route and add a monochrome sensor to the mix. Alternatively, it could do neither and do its own thing, which is probably more likely.

Either way, Apple’s iPhone cameras have always performed well so we’d expect no less from the iPhone 7 Pro whether it comes with one sensor on the rear, or two.

The front is likely to see at least a 5-megapixel camera, like the current iPhones, and no doubt the Retina Flash will also be on board, or something similar.

Apple iPhone 7 Pro: Hardware

Aside from the addition of the Smart Connector, which allows for the transfer of both data and power at the same time, there aren’t any specific rumours relating to the iPhone 7 Pro’s hardware.

It will no doubt come with at least the A10 processor if the device arrives at all. This is what is expected for the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus too. Whether Apple will choose to put an even faster processor into the iPhone 7 Pro is unclear as we don’t even have details on the A10 but it would seem odd for the company to announce two new chips.

The Apple iPhone 7 Plus is reported to be coming with 3GB of RAM, so we would expect the same for the iPhone 7 Pro, if not more. Most competing flagship devices offer 4GB now, with talk of 6GB on its way, but Apple has always avoided the numbers game here too.

In terms of storage, it’s been claimed that Apple will ditch the 16GB model for the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus, suggesting the same will be the case for the iPhone 7 Pro. There has also been talk of a 256GB model, which can be found in the company’s iPad Pro range.

Apparently the iPhone 7 Plus will also be upping its battery capacity to 3100mAh, so we’d expect similar for the iPhone 7 Pro.

Apple iPhone 7 Pro: Software

If the iPhone 7 Pro becomes a reality, it will debut with iOS 10, like the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus.

Like every yearly software update, there are several new features and functions in iOS 10, including a revamp of Messages. You can read more about the new software and what to expect in our separate feature.

Apple iPhone 7 Pro: Will it happen?

This is the big question on everyone’s lips. We aren’t convinced at the moment but there are certainly arguments for both sides. 

Apple currently offers four iPads and no one bats an eyelid so offering four iPhones wouldn’t be a completely ridiculous suggestion, not to mention cover most bases. Some of the rumours are also reasonably plausible.

We’ve seen dual-cameras on other flagship devices and the Smart Connector is a useful feature on the iPad so why not put both on the iPhone?

The only thing we would say is why not just make the Plus, the Pro? Having the option of two 5.5-inch devices with identical designs aside from a couple of extra features seems a little excessive. It will also be very confusing.

Then again, if the Pro model makes the iPhone appealing to those who currently aren’t excited by it, or it gives people a reason to upgrade even though it might look almost identical to the iPhone 6 and 6S, we suppose that’s business. Right?

21
Jul

Say farewell to VHS (if you hadn’t already)


The last company that still makes VHS players will reportedly cease production of the technology at the end of July. The news comes from Japan’s Nikkei, which claims that Funai has decided to call it quits long after everyone pulled out of the game. The firm has decided to bow out after sourcing the components necessary to build the devices became too difficult to continue. Oh, and the fact that it’s 2016 and VHS is about as useful a format as wax cylinders in an age of lossless digital transfer. Despite this, 750,000 of the players were sold worldwide, the majority probably going to hipsters who say that they can only appreciate Terminator 2 with tracking lines.

Via: Mental Floss

Source: Nikkei

21
Jul

The live-action ‘Pokémon’ movie starts production next year


Last week the rumblings of a live-action Pokémon movie were just that. But now Legendary Pictures has confirmed that it has secured the rights for a Detective Pikachu flick, according to The Hollywood Reporter. The game it’s based on isn’t available stateside just yet, but perhaps it will be by the time production starts on the movie next year. We now know that Universal is doing the distribution work outside of Japan. However, any other details are light.

THR writes that this is being fast tracked, likely due to the franchise’s 20th anniversary, the overwhelming popularity of Pokémon Go and the mobile game’s impact on Nintendo’s stock price at the moment. Maybe this big-screen version will finally entice Danny DeVito to lend a foul-mouthed voice to the adorable electric-type pocket monster. In reality though, that seems about as shaky as the stability of Pokémon Go’s servers at this point.

Source: The Hollywood Reporter

21
Jul

‘Candid,’ the anonymous chat app, enforces civility with AI


If Twitter, 4Chan and Reddit are any indication, people will exploit even the barest of anonymization to be complete and utter asshats online. Just look at the recent attacks against Ghostbusters star Leslie Jones, or Reddit’s self-induced purge of racist, xenophobic and bigoted chat groups. Fully anonymized social services like Whisper or Yik Yak, where unidentifiable mobs can unceasingly bully other users, are no better. An app called Candid, which launches today, is designed to fight this unacceptable online behavior with artificial intelligence.

Developed by a pair of former Google project leads, Candid (the company) has developed a natural language processing system that analyzes every piece of posted content and flags inflammatory items for removal — things like hate speech, threats and slander. Off-topic posts are moved to more appropriate sections, so you won’t have to dig through political discussions to read about NASA’s mission to Mars.

Candid (the app) is available free on both iOS and Android. Similar to Yik Yak’s location-based function, each Candid user will see a personalized feed of posts and content based on their “education, employment, interests and neighborhood,” according to the company’s press release.

Interestingly, you can even sign up using your Facebook account to seed the app’s Group suggestions. That seems counterintuitive, though Candid’s stringent privacy rules account for this. All personally identifiable data — including IP address, precise location data and Facebook contacts — are encrypted with a one-way hash before they reach the company’s servers. That hash cannot be decrypted by Candid — or anyone else, for that matter. What’s more, closing or abandoning an account permanently deletes all that encrypted data from Candid’s servers.

Oddly, though, the app also requires users to provide their phone number during the initial account setup. The app even sends a two-step authentication code to confirm that the number is real. That data are encrypted like everything else Candid collects but it feels strange and out-of-place to request that right off the bat, especially from an app that sells itself on anonymity.

Once you get through the initial setup, Candid offers a number of mechanisms to maintain the user’s privacy. For example, the app applies a new, continually randomized username like “Curious Rabbit” or “Creative Lemur” to every new post. The app also gently coerces users to be polite by awarding various badges like “Explorer,” “Giver” or “Gossip” for positive posts, but will slap a “Hater” tag on people who are consistently negative.

This process, according to Candid’s PR team, is entirely automated. A “lot of factors contribute to getting the hater badge,” a rep told me, “including the number of negative comments and posts based on sentiment analysis, number of down votes a user gets and the number of posts from the user that were taken down. Posts that are taken down by the system are reviewed by a human.”

Additionally, Candid has a system in place to first identify potentially unsubstantiated rumors through its algorithmic AI, which are then verified by a person using web and Twitter results. Any rumors deemed to be false are quickly removed, while true statements — such as news leaks — remain. Similarly, if the system sees that a poster is threatening self-harm, it will issue a push notification to him or her with the number for a local crisis helpline.

So what do you get when an AI automatically scrubs your internet forum of all offensive content? Turns out, it’s banality. The test feeds that I created during my time using the service felt like a disembodied comments section, regardless of the groups that I subscribed to. While you can add external links to posts, very few of the 600-plus beta testers appear to do so. This leaves you reading strings of random, disconnected thoughts with very little context. You won’t find inflammatory content (kudos for that) but the discussions filling that void are far from riveting. Most posts echo the same shallow hot takes you’d find on YouTube or Reddit, just without the overt xenophobia and misogyny.

What’s more, there isn’t much actual discussion going on within these posts. Granted, that may be because there are only a few hundred beta testers, but most replies to posts resemble those in a YT comment section — people talk at each other, often in non sequiturs, rather than with each other. Or perhaps it’s like The New York Times comment section: There’s plenty of civility, sure, but it’s generally devoid of real interaction. Groupthink is also an issue once you delve beyond the broadest of groups. The overarching Politics Group offers a variety of thoughts and opinions but once you get into the Republican and Democrat groups or the Sanders, Clinton and Trump groups, views expressed within them become increasingly myopic.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

At a more basic level, I can’t figure out the intrinsic value or benefit this app is really supposed to provide its users. Outside divulging state secrets or posting the details of a damning business deaI — which I am willing to bet nobody reading this post has ever been in the position to do — I fail to see why one would need to go to these anonymizing lengths. If anything, this app encourages disingenuous behavior. I could go on there and make threats against the president’s life if I felt like it, with virtually no reprisal outside having the system eventually flag and delete the post. I mean, if you feel you have to shield yourself behind multiple digital walls just to toss that gem of an opinion out onto the internet, write it down in a journal instead, scream it into a pillow — or maybe just keep it to yourself.

21
Jul

Moto Z and Z Force Droid review: The risks are mostly worth it


Ever since the original Moto X came out, I’ve been fascinated by Motorola. We saw one of the biggest, oldest brands in communications take a long, hard look at where it’s been and chart a thoughtful path forward. Flash forward a few years (and a few Moto Xs) and wouldn’t you know it? Motorola started to lose some of its voltage when it came to its flagship phones. Don’t get me wrong, the Moto X Pure Edition was a fantastic device, but in hindsight it’s not hard to see that it was more of the same.

While we might still see a new Moto X this year, Motorola decided to try something different. We now have two different modular flagship smartphones, the superthin Moto Z Droid ($624) and the sturdier Moto Z Force Droid ($720). Some might bristle that both are exclusive to Verizon and aren’t yet slated for an international launch (I sure did), but there’s no two ways about it: These are still the most exciting Motorola phones in a long time.

Note: For the sake of brevity, I’m not going to bother calling these things “Droid Editions” for the rest of the review.

Hardware

Review: Motorola Moto Z and Z Force (Droid Edition)

At 5.2mm thick, the Moto Z is the thinnest flagship phone I’ve ever used, and it’s just stunning. In fact, when it comes to design, the Moto Z couldn’t be any more different from the flagship Moto Xs that came before it — the friendly curves and sloping back are gone, leaving us with something more angular and elegant. Think of it as the lightweight Lamborghini to the Moto X Pure’s friendly VW Beetle. If I’m honest, I was concerned that a phone this thin would feel insubstantial, but Motorola dodged that issue too. Aside from the pane of Gorilla Glass covering its 5.5-inch, quad HD AMOLED display, the Z’s body is crafted entirely of metal, lending it a crucial air of rigidity. Fair warning, though: Our review units came in a two-tone black and gray finish that both looks lovely and acts like a fingerprint-and-schmutz magnet.

All that said, this phone certainly isn’t for everyone. Some people I’ve shown the phone to (here’s looking at you, Devindra) think the Moto Z is too skinny to feel comfortable in-hand. More important, you can’t build a phone this thin without making a few compromises. Motorola could only squeeze a relatively modest 2,600mAh battery into the Z’s body. The 13-megapixel camera juts out from the back in a circular hump. And the most divisive change? The phone’s slim frame meant Motorola had to ax the headphone jack. Motorola is convinced it’s on the right side of history with this move, but in the short term, you’re stuck buying either a pair of USB Type-C headphones or using an adapter that comes in the box.

I’ll delve more into the audio quality a little later, but right off the bat, the change presents some tricky issues to tangle with. Let’s say you’re a klutz like me: You’re probably going to lose that dongle before long. And if you’re listening to music through wired headphones, you can’t charge the phone at the same time. Inconvenient at best; counterproductive at worst.

Motorola is so sure of this decision that the Z’s cousin, the Moto Z Force, lacks the headphone jack as well, even though its thicker body could definitely have accommodated one. Throughout my week of testing, I’ve been looking at the Z Force as the Moto Z for everyone else: It has the same new look, paired with a bigger 3,500mAh battery and Motorola’s Shattershield design to keep you from cracking your screen. Throw in an improved 21-megapixel rear camera and we have a package that more than makes up for Z Force’s heftier dimensions. If owning an incredibly thin smartphone isn’t high on your list of priorities, you’re probably better off looking at this version of the Z instead. It’s just too bad neither of these phones are waterproof: They’re nano-coated to resist splashes, but that’s it.

Despite their differences, the slim Moto Z and the sturdy Z Force share some powerful silicon. Thrumming away inside both devices is a quad-core Snapdragon 820 chip paired with 4GB of RAM and an Adreno 530 GPU — just like almost every other flagship Android phone released this year. The similarities don’t end there, either: Both sport an excellent fingerprint reader beneath the screen, either 32GB or 64GB of internal storage, a microSD card slot for as much as 2TB of extra space, and a 5-megapixel front-facing camera. A trio of tiny volume buttons and a sleep/wake key poke out of both phones’ right side, and on the bottom is a solitary USB Type-C socket for power, data transfers and audio.

Both devices are showcases for Motorola’s impeccable workmanship, but they’re made even more interesting by the array of golden contacts on their backs. Those 16 points make up what the company calls its Moto Mod connector, which allows power and data to flow between the phone and optional accessories that magnetically latch to the phones’ backs. The first batch includes a tiny projector, battery case and a JBL speaker, and they add a lot to the Moto Z/Z Force formula, so I’ll be sure to dig deeper on these in just a moment. For now, just know this: Motorola’s approach to modularity is the most elegant you’ll find on the market right now.

Display and sound

Both Moto Z phones feature 5.5-inch AMOLED displays running at 2,560 x 1,440 resolution, and they’re pretty great. In addition to very accommodating viewing angles, you’ll get the usual punchy colors that come with AMOLED screens. If they’re a little too punchy for your liking, though, you can hop into the device’s settings and poke around: The “Vibrant” color mode is enabled by default, but there’s also a “Standard” option that attempts to render colors more realistically. I’ve come to prefer the slightly oversaturated look you’ll see by default, but hey, it’s nice to have choices.

It’s also worth noting that these displays don’t look identical. My Moto Z’s panel seems a little more high-contrast than the Z Force’s screen, and I’m willing to bet that’s because of the Z Force’s Shattershield construction. In case you never owned a Droid Turbo 2, here’s the skinny: Above the AMOLED panel itself, there’s a redundant touch-sensing layer and two protective lenses, all meant to keep the screen from breaking if the Z Force takes a tumble. I reluctantly treated this thing like a jerk throughout my week of testing, dropping it on concrete for laughs and lobbing it onto my desk from across the room. The damage? A couple nicks on the screen and some scuffs on the phone’s aluminum edge. Shattershield is a welcome feature indeed, but it’s important to remember that it doesn’t make the Moto Z Force invincible.

Both phones also have a single speaker above the screen, nestled in the same place as the earpiece. It’s a far cry from the stereo setups we’ve seen in other smartphones, but you know what? The Z/Z Force’s speakers consistently churned out crisp (if not terribly loud) audio. It’s not a surprise, really: Lots of companies sort of phone it in when it comes to speaker quality, and it’s clear Motorola would like you to buy one of JBL’s sweet speaker Mods.

Now, about that pesky headphone issue. I’ve used the included USB Type-C dongle with several pairs of cans and in-ears, and it doesn’t seem to affect audio quality at all when playing high-quality tunes saved on Spotify. If anything, my biggest gripes were logistical: When I didn’t keep the dongle attached to headphones, it got lost in the depths of my backpack. When I did keep it attached, it sometimes made the cord long enough to be cumbersome when jamming everything into my pocket (especially when those headphones had an L-plug).

Are these huge issues? No, not really (and if you’re a Bluetooth headphone person, basically none of these gripes apply). Still, these sticking points aren’t going away for a while, so keep that in mind before you buy.

Camera

Let’s be honest: Motorola isn’t exactly known as a leader in photography. That’s why the company’s work this year is so surprising: We now have two Motorola phones with seriously good cameras. If the normal Moto Z is your thing, you’ll get a 13-megapixel main camera with a f/1.8 aperture lens and a laser autofocus module. My expectations were set needlessly low. As it turns out, the Z’s camera takes bright, nicely detailed shots with vivid colors almost across the board. It does stumble a bit in low light, where you’ll plenty of grain and soft edges, but really, what smartphone doesn’t? The Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge are still better all-around performers, but for once, Motorola has done well to close the gap.

Meanwhile, the Moto Z Force’s camera does a slightly better job of capturing fine detail, which really isn’t surprising — it’s a 21-megapixel sensor, after all. What is surprising is how tight the image-quality race can be sometimes. For a while, the Moto Z seemed a little better at rendering accurate colors, but then photos with the Z Force started coming out a little better. Then back. Then forth. You get my drift. What makes this whole thing even stranger is that the Moto Z Force was occasionally slower to focus on subjects than the Z, despite having phase-detection autofocus in addition to a laser-autofocus module. A quick tap or two is all it takes to set it right, but that’s still a little odd. It’s the Z Force’s low-light performance that clinches the deal here: It’s not quite Galaxy S7-level, but it’s closer than I dared dream.

Despite some curious performance quirks, I’d ultimately go with the Z Force as my shooter of choice — it’s as good a camera as Motorola has ever made, even if the underlying software needs some extra polish. Still, the standard Moto Z is no slouch.

Beyond the intricacies of their sensors, the Z and Z Force camera experiences have a lot in common. They share a 5-megapixel, wide-angle camera for selfies that does a generally lovely job of capturing those fleeting moments of vanity. Speaking of vanity, there’s also a new Beauty Mode that irons out the wrinkles and blemishes that might mar one’s selfies. I wouldn’t be at all shocked if this was a feature that parent company Lenovo insisted on; these sorts of cosmetic enhancements have popped up, and continue to pop up, in Lenovo smartphones.

It’s too bad it doesn’t work very well. I snapped selfies at both ends of the Beauty mode spectrum and neither did much for my looks. This year, Motorola also added a Professional Mode that allows for more granular control over your photos. Once enabled, you’ll get full control over ISO, white balance, shutter speed and exposure — change any of those settings and you’ll get a live update on your display. Just maybe don’t go too crazy with them. I managed to crash the camera app a few times doing that.

Moto Mods

Of course, the story of the Moto Z and Z Force extend beyond the devices themselves. Motorola has a vision centered on accessories that snap onto the phone with magnets. Not only is this less annoying than LG’s attempt with the G5 — it’s simpler and cleaner too. Motorola has also said that these first-generation Moto Mods will work with next year’s model as well, though the company isn’t promising anything beyond that.

First up: Motorola’s Insta-Share projector. When fully charged, the projector will run for about an hour on its own before using the battery in your phone. Stick it far enough away from a wall and you can get a picture that’s about 70 inches diagonal, a pretty big jump from the clunker of a TV I bought on sale years ago. Your environment needs to be superdark, and it can be tough to get the focus right, but once everything came together, I had a bit of a “wow” moment I didn’t see coming. There are, however, two potential issues to keep in mind. First, the speakers baked into the projector aren’t great, so you’ll want an external set if you’re really after something resembling a movie-theater experience. Second, it’ll set you back $299. If you’ve got money to burn, then by all means, go for it, but for most, it won’t be worth it.

Compared with that, the $79 JBL speaker Mod seems way more modest. I probably pissed off a few people in the office by cranking it up all the way, which can be almost unpleasantly loud depending on the kind of music you’re listening to. It lasts about 10 hours on a charge, and the speaker burns through that juice before switching to the phone’s battery for power. Alas, the audio doesn’t sound as meaty as I imagined; it seems to do better with podcasts and songs with lots of action in the mid and high range. Here’s my issue, though: You could get a portable Bluetooth speaker that sounds better (and works with any smartphone) for around the same price. Either way, you’d have to carry around a second piece of hardware. On the plus side, though, it has a kickstand to prop up the phone — a helpful touch when you’re watching videos.

Really, though, the best Moto Mod is a battery back that basically doubles the Moto Z’s battery life while still managing to feel like a natural extension of the phone. If you buy a Moto Z, this needs to go with it.

By building the Moto Mod connector and inking deals with companies like JBL, Motorola is admitting that we can’t always have everything we want in one single device. The beauty of Motorola’s design, though, means the things we add to the Moto Z feel like seamless parts of the device itself. It’s still early days for the Moto Mods program, and the only way to ensure it goes anywhere is to buy this stuff. Hopefully, enough people invest in this new ecosystem of hardware to keep it alive. It would be a shame to see such an elegant solution flounder.

(Side note: if you’ve got a brilliant idea for a Moto Mod of your own, Motorola is opening up its developer program in August — $125 gets you a hardware-development kit for bread-boarding and hashing out initial designs.)

Software

Motorola is well known for releasing smartphones that run very clean, almost stock versions of Android… unless those smartphones are Verizon exclusives like these. The broad strokes of Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow are still there, and for the most part, Motorola seemed happy to leave well enough alone; the most notable visual tweak is a dark theme applied to the familiar Marshmallow menus and app launcher.

Still, Verizon’s influence is undeniable. There’s a separate-but-optional setup process to get started with Verizon’s cloud upon first boot, and lots of preloaded software I never touched. I’m talking VZ Navigator, VZ Protect, Message+, Caller Name ID and a cloud app, not to mention NFL Mobile, Slacker, Audible and a ton of derivative games. You can delete some of them, but the rest need to be disabled in the settings and I couldn’t so this fast enough.

Curiously, the Motorola-made apps that used to come preloaded on the company’s Verizon-bound phones aren’t here anymore. If you want Loop and Zap (which let you keep tabs on loved ones and share content with people nearby, respectively), you’ll have to get them from the Play Store. I love it when companies stop trying to force apps of dubious value on us — HTC recently did this too — but Verizon pushed enough bloatware that Motorola’s cleanliness almost went unnoticed.

On the plus side, Motorola’s thoughtful software tricks are all still here. The sensors on the Z’s face can still detect your hands as they approach, and they’ll light up part of the display to show you the time and your notifications. Like before, you can double-twist your wrist to launch the camera, and a double karate chop turns on the flashlight. As it happens, Motorola added a new gesture this year: If you swipe up from the bottom of the display, the on-screen view will shrink so you can reach the notification shade without having to reposition your hand.

The Moto Z siblings are great at listening for your voice commands, too. Once you’ve trained them to listen to your activation phrase (mine is the dull “OK, Moto Z”), the phones will wake up and take requests like a proper assistant. That might not sound like a high bar to clear — after all, virtual assistants have come a long way since the earliest days of Siri and Google Now — but Motorola was one of the first companies to go big on phones that always listened, and they’re still very good at making them.

Performance

We can keep this part simple: The Moto Z and Z Force are damned fast. Is that really any surprise? Both run with the same high-end Snapdragon silicon as most other flagship Android phones I’ve played with this year, and they’ve all been really fast too. As always, my week of testing included all the usual, frenzied multitasking for work, along with loads of Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat X, Hearthstone and Pokémon Go when the news died down. Try as I might — and trust me, I tried — the Moto Z and Z Force handled all of my trials with gusto. (They do get noticeably warm when you starting to push them, though.) Ultimately, now that premium smartphones like the Moto Z and its ilk all fall into the same performance range, the details that make these devices different are more important than ever.

AndEBench Pro 16,678 16,455 14,168 16,673
Vellamo 3.0 5,613 5,727 4,285 4,876
3DMark IS Unlimited 29,117 28,964 28,529 26,747
GFXBench 3.0 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (fps) 49 49 45 48
CF-Bench 45,803 44,977 51,227 49,891
SunSpider 1.0.2: Android devices tested in Chrome; lower scores are better.

Consider batteries, for instance. Thanks to its slim body, Motorola fitted the Moto Z with a 2,600mAh cell. Not bad, but definitely not great. I’ll admit, even though I’ve used smartphones with similar specs and battery sizes before, I went into this review expecting the worst. Thankfully, that was unwarranted. On days of heavy use, the Z would get me through the work day but give up the ghost not long after. That works out to about 11 hours of pretty continuous use, though you can stretch that up to about a day and a half if you’re a very, very cautious user. In our standard Engadget rundown test (looping a video with the screen brightness set to 50 percent and WiFi connected), the Moto Z lasted about just north of 10 hours. That’s on par with the LG G5 and HTC 10.

This means the Moto Z’s battery will probably cut it for most people, but anyone on the fence should consider the next step up. As you’d expect, the Moto Z Force blew its skinny sibling out of the water. I routinely got two full days of use out of its larger 3,500mAh battery, and got closer to three days over a particularly quiet weekend. Not bad at all. And in our rundown test, the Z Force looped the same sample video for 14 hours and 12 minutes, just 18 minutes less than Samsung’s Galaxy S7 Edge.

The competition

I probably sound like a broken record saying this, but there’s really never been a better time to buy a top-tier Android phone. While some are better suited to certain situations than others, there really isn’t a bad choice among them. Samsung’s Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge are waterproof and still lead the pack in camera performance, though you’ll have to deal with the (much improved!) TouchWiz interface that’s layered on top of Android Marshmallow. The HTC 10’s fit and finish is first-rate, and it handles media better out of the box: It’ll tune your music for your preferences and headphones, for one, and it’s the first Android phone to officially support Apple’s AirPlay streaming standard. Meanwhile, if you’re shopping for flagship power on a budget, the reasonably priced OnePlus 3 brings the speed for a fraction of what the Moto Z and Z Force cost.

But if we’re looking at the Moto Z and Z Force as modular phones, first and foremost, the only real comparison this year is LG’s G5. The broad strokes are similar — Snapdragon 820, 4GB of RAM, a circle of “Friend” accessories — but the Moto Z’s elegant execution gives those two phones a clear edge. Just look at LG’s setup: modules connect to the bottom of the G5, requiring you to remove the phone’s battery, attach it to the new module, stick that whole thing back into the phone and power it up. At best, it’s an annoyance. On the plus side, though, you’ll be able to swap batteries willy-nilly, and you have a really neat dual-camera setup to play with.

Wrap-up

I have to give Motorola credit for doing what LG couldn’t: building modular smartphones that are convenient, cool and worth using. It doesn’t hurt, either, that the Moto Z and Z Force are two of the best-made devices in Motorola’s history, and that they can go toe-to-toe with any other flagship Android phone out there. These devices represent Motorola at the top of its phone-making game.

It’s a shame, then, that some curious decisions have kept me from loving the Z and Z Force more fully. Part of it is the lack of a headphone jack. Maybe I’m old-school, but I can’t be the only one who misses it. Part of it, too, is that some of the Mods are of dubious value. Worse, only a certain chunk of people — Verizon customers — can buy these phones. Ultimately, though, the strength of the Moto Z line and the potential of Moto Mods outweigh the few cons. If you’re a Verizon customer on the hunt for a powerful smartphone, pay attention to these two. (And if you’re a klutz, pay closer attention to the Z Force.) The rest of us will just have to hang in there — Motorola can’t let phones this good stay exclusive for too long.