Skip to content

Archive for

1
Feb

How to install Android on a PC


RemixandGenySmall
Android is the most popular mobile operating system in the world, but that does not mean it can’t be installed on the desktop. There are many ways to get Android running on a PC, including virtual device emulators like Genymotion, bootable USB versions like Remix OS, or even full stand alone applications like BlueStacks. Each have their advantages and disadvantages depending on your needs. Here is the full breakdown of each.

Using a virtual device

GenyMotion
While this may seem like a slow, unintuitive way to use Android on the desktop, using a virtual device has many advantages. If you are a developer and need to test apps, this is the best way to make sure everything runs smoothly. There are two major virtual device emulators that are currently used, Genymotion and the Google Android Virtual Device Manager that comes with Android Studio, both are compared here.

These virtual device emulators have evolved quite a bit since their first release. If you select x86_64 as the architecture then there is the option to run the Android virtual device in “fast virt mode” which uses Intel’s Hardware Accelerated Execution Manager (HAXM) to speed up the performance. But this only works x86_64, it will not speed up x86_32, ARM or MIPS. Genymotion runs on the x86 architecture and also runs very smoothly, if not smoother than the AVD Manager. One of the biggest disadvantages of using this method is that there is no Google Play Store. Since there is no Play Store, you will not be able to install third party apps onto the virtual device without sideloading. Also if you never plan on developing, having Android Studio wasting space on your computer may be inconvenient, and Genymotion requires the virtual machine manager VirtualBox to be installed to work. This method will work on OS X, Windows and Linux without issue. Genymotion can be found here and Android Studio that includes the AVD Manager can be found here.

Using BlueStacks

BlueStacks2
While still technically a virtual machine, using a dedicated application has a lot of benefits. This method usually runs smoother and is more integrated with the host operating system. The app in mention is BlueStacks. Founded in 2011, BlueStacks set out to integrate Android onto the desktop. With BlueStacks the user has the ability to download Android apps from the Play Store and Amazon Appstore then run the apps from an app picker. By default, BlueStacks doesn’t behave like a normal Android device, but with a quick install of a third party launcher, BlueStacks can be used like any normal device.

There are some disadvantages to BlueStacks, however. The Android version used is 4.4.2 KitKat, which is now two versions old and using BlueStacks to develop on is not as easy as a standard virtual device as there are no configuration settings like hardware specifications. On the plus side, getting apps up and running takes very little effort and most run pretty well. The main exception to this is 3D games like Asphalt 8. Since BlueStacks runs at a resolution of 1280×720 on OS X and does not support real time shadows, Asphalt 8 looks down right awful on OS X and it is even unplayable in certain parts of the map since it can not render the shadows and just shows black instead. On Windows, which runs at 1920×1080, it is not much better with BlueStacks unable to handle 1080p 3D gaming, but at least the shadows are visible, but aren’t real time. Simpler games like Crossy Road run just fine however. BlueStacks also integrates with Windows to transfer files like APKs and there is even universal copy and paste. The user interface on Windows is more akin to what you would see in a web browser and offers quick app switching in a tab format on the top of the window. This is a very nice feature but it is not available in the OS X version. BlueStacks can be found here.

Using Remix OS

_DSC5990
Remix OS is a new name in the Android space but that does not mean that Jide, the company behind Remix OS, hasn’t made something awesome. Based on the work from Android-x86.org, Remix OS offers something no other Android on the desktop solution has: true multitasking. Remix OS mimics a full desktop OS with a task bar and has window support for apps. This makes multitasking a breeze and it just doesn’t feel like Android, in a good way. Right now there is only one official method to use Remix OS, and that is a bootable USB drive. You will need a USB 3.0 drive with at least 8 gigabytes of storage. Keep in mind USB 3.0 is not required, but is recommended by Jide for a smooth experience. There are two versions that are available to download, the legacy package and the EFI package. If you are unsure which one is right, download the legacy package, as it supports most PCs. If you are on Windows there is a tool included that will help you make a bootable USB drive. In the initial setup, it will be asked whether you want “Resident mode” or “Guest mode”. Resident mode will save your data between sessions and guest mode will not. It is also possible, but not supported, to make a virtual machine of Remix OS, although I could only get guest mode to boot with some tweaking. It is also possible to install Google Play Services, which are not included by default, so this means that the Google Play store can be installed and apps can be downloaded, the guide to do that can be found here. Keep in mind that this is very much alpha software so expect a few crashes. I experienced two crashes in just about an hour.

Installing Remix OS

This method is the hardest and most inconvenient way to run Android on the PC, but it is all worth it once the system is booted up (for the most part). There are two ways to install Remix OS, the first is the official way by USB and the second way is through VirtualBox.

USB

This is the first and perhaps best way to install Remix OS. You will get the best, fastest experience and official support. The first thing is to grab the legacy install of Remix OS here. Once downloaded unzip it and run the .exe included. Once open, chooses the .iso file from the same folder in the application. Make sure your USB stick is plugged in and click OK. This will go through all the steps to get the USB ready, once done it will ask if you want to reboot your computer. Make sure you boot from the USB drive and then selected with resident mode or guest mode. Resident mode will keep your data while guest mode will not. I was successfully able to install Google Play Services and run Antutu to get a score of 177606, while I do not take benchmarks too seriously, that is not a bad score!

VirtualBox

This method is great for people who do not want to go through all the steps to dual boot their PC. The first thing to do is download VirtualBox from here, and the legacy download of Remix OS here. Once both are downloaded unzip Remix OS to a folder. Next install VirtualBox and open it. Once VirtualBox is open click “new” in the upper left hand corner and select Linux in the first drop box and “Other Linux (64-bit)” in the second. Remix OS probably won’t need too much RAM, 2GB will be enought, but you could bumped that up as high as 4GB if you want. However never allocate more than half of your physical memory to a virtual machine.

The next step is to create a virtual hard drive, make sure the radio button labeled “create a virtual hard disk now” is selected and click create, keep the option at “VDI” and hit continue. The next screen asks if you want the drive “dynamically allocated” and the answer is yes, that way you will save hard drive space as it only takes up as much space as needed this way. Clicking continue will bring you to where you can adjust the name and size of the drive, this is up to you, but at least 16 GBs is recommended. Once you hit create the virtual machine is just about set up. Right click on the VM on the left side and click settings and go to the storage tab. From here, right next to “Controller: IDE” click the button that looks like a green plus on top of a disc and choose the .iso Remix OS file and click ok. This loads the .iso file as a boot disk when you boot up the VM.

Next click “Start” to start the VM, once it is booted you will be prompted with the same screen as you would booting from USB, but this time only guest mode will work. Choose guest mode and press tab and type in “vga=791” and press enter. This locks the resolution so it can not be scaled, this isn’t ideal but it was the only way I could get it to actually boot fully. There is no saving of data in guest mode, but VirtualBox is able to save the machine state and restore it exactly as you left it, so everything will be saved. Also a side note, VirtualBox defaults to mouse integration, which does not work properly in Remix OS, so you will have to uncheck that option once the VM is running by going to “input” and unchecking the mouse integration option. There you have it, Remix OS should now be up and running.

Using Android-x86.org

Android-x86 (Left), Remix OS (Right)

Android-x86 (Left), Remix OS (Right)

Based on the Android Open Source Project, Android-x86.org set out to make Android available to anyone with a PC. Go here here to download the latest version. At the time of this article Android 5.1 was the newest version available. You will need to download and install VirtualBox. Inside VirtualBox open click “new” in the upper left hand corner and select Linux in the first drop box and “Oracle (64-bit)” in the second. Go through the options like you would for Remix OS and once finished load the .iso as a disc by right clicking on the VM and clicking settings. Once in the setting go to the storage tab and next to “Controller: IDE” click on the disc with the green plus over it. Find the .iso you downloaded, click it and press OK.

Now run the VM by clicking “Start”. Once the VM is booted you will be presented with a screen, go to the last option on the bottom to install Android. The next screen will ask what drive you want to install Android on, just hit the enter key. You will need to format the virtual drive to install Android, I chose fat32. Once an option is selected hit enter. Next use the arrow keys to select ok and hit enter. Skip the GRUB install options as they will cause the VM to lock up and are not needed in this use case. I also chose to install the system as read/write, this is totally up to you. Click yes to create the data.img and make it as large as possible so you can install more apps.

That’s it, Android is now installed, hit enter to boot into your freshly installed OS. It should only take a few moments to boot up. This is completely stock Android with no additions whatsoever, which is a good and bad thing. The good news is that Google Play Services is installed by default, the bad news is that the VM runs at a low resolution and and using something made for touch on a desktop is not that intuitive. That being said, Android runs very smooth and I haven’t ran into any bugs in my use. I have noticed that if you shutdown the machine you will need to reinstall Android-x86 every time you want to use it. The best option is to just save the machine state like you would for Remix OS.

Comparing the options and wrap-up

Each method has it’s advantages and disadvantages, but it really depends on what you want out of having Android on your desktop. If you want to develop apps then AVD Manager or similar will be the best bet. If you want to use Android on your desktop like you would on your phone, then BlueStacks is for you. A virtual machine is very configurable in every way including resolution, screen size and processor architecture, while BlueStacks has no such features. BlueStacks does have the Google Play Store along with the Amazon App Store which allows third party apps to be installed. But with a low resolution and no real time shadow support, 3D games do not play well. The AVD Manager and Genymotion both have some baggage that come with them, the AVD Manager has to have Android Studio installed to run and Genymotion uses VirtualBox’s virtualization. Remix OS is the hardest to get working but offers many features and will only get better over time. This could be a desktop operating system alternative for light workloads and can even have the Play Store installed. Android-x86 works great as a proof of concept, but it isn’t that practical to use when comparing it to the other options discussed in this article. Running at a low resolution and not having any special features to set it apart, you would be better off running Remix OS and installing the Google Play Services if you want to use VirtualBox, or better yet boot Remix OS from a flash drive.

Overall, none of the solutions are perfect, all have their quirks while offering a decent experience. It really depends on your needs and it may be a good idea to install multiple solutions. Which method do you prefer? Let us know in the comments!

1
Feb

Xiaomi topped China’s smartphone market in 2015


Xiaomi Redmi Note 3-5

Although Xiaomi may not have shipped quite as many smartphones last year as some had been expecting, data from Canalys and Strategy Analytics suggests that Xiaomi was still the largest smartphone manufacturer in China in 2015. Last year, Xiaomi missed its 80 million sales target by just under 10 million units. This figure was already revised down from a 100 million global target that had been set earlier in the year.

Looking at the yearly results from Strategy Analytics, Xiaomi led China’s market with 67.5 million shipments throughout the year, followed closely by rival Huawei which shipped 62.2 million. Apple secured itself third position in the country, followed by Vivo and OPPO in fourth and fifth places.

https://live.amcharts.com/wYmEx/embed/

Although Xiaomi may still hold the top spot in China, it is Huawei which now looks to be the fastest growing of the two. Huawei saw its shipments increase from 41.3 to 62.2 million year over year, a huge growth rate of almost 51 percent. Xiaomi saw a growth rate of just 17 percent, while Vivo and OPPO grew by 52 and 49 percent respectively. Interestingly, the research notes that Huawei’s average smartphone selling price rose from $216 to $306 last year, while Xiaomi’s fell from $189 to $149.


Xiaomi Mi Home storeSee also: Xiaomi aiming to double Chinese store sales this year17

Overall, the Chinese smartphone market grew by just 3.4 percent, its slowest rate to date. Combined with the big growth of the leading manufacturers, this suggests that a number of other players are being pushed out of the Chinese market. Samsung saw its market share hit new lows in Q4 2015, according to Canalys, falling from some 11.6 percent to just 7.8 percent over the space of one year.

It was inevitable that the Chinese smartphone market would show signs of saturation, but it may have happened sooner than many had expected. Chinese consumers look to be turning their preference towards higher-end products, which has worked to the favour of Huawei and Vivo, but has slowed Xiaomi’s march. That said, Xiaomi’s flagship Mi 5 handset is right around the corner.

1
Feb

Sundance champ ‘Birth of a Nation’ chose Fox over Netflix


This weekend Nate Parker’s film The Birth of a Nation won the Sundance Film Festival Grand Jury and Audience prizes for a drama, just days after signing a record $17.5 million distribution deal with Fox Searchlight. That was in contrast to a number of other flicks that ended up signing with Netflix or Amazon, and there’s a reason. While reports from The Wrap and The Hollywood Reporter claim Netflix offered as much as $20 million during an all night bidding war, Parker wanted a large theatrical release for the movie. While Netflix movies are open for theatrical releases, so far they’ve had extremely limited showings because the company insists on offering them for streaming on the same day — most theater owners don’t want the competition.

According to Parker, Fox Searchlight is also open to his ideas about showing the movie, focusing on Nat Turner’s slave rebellion, at high schools and colleges. His purpose in making the movie is to inspire activism, and he considers himself an activist first. Fox Searchlight could also advertise itself as the studio that took 12 Years A Slave to an eventual Best Picture award. In contrast, while Netflix released the critically acclaimed Beasts of No Nation last year, (notching over three million views in a matter of days and winning Idris Elba a supporting actor trophy Saturday at the Screen Actors Guild awards) it didn’t snag a single Oscar nomination.

Another worth noting is Netflix’s interaction with the director of Parker’s last film. Before taking two years off to make this movie he had a lead role in the romantic film Beyond the Lights. In 2015 its director Gina Prince-Bythewood noted Netflix’s “more like this” suggestion algorithm tended to group movies by the racial background of their cast, more than genre.

Netflix exec Ted Sarandos explained that while Beyond the Lights is categorized by its genre and content, the more like this suggestions depend on the statistics of what viewers actually watch the most, and that over time they should broaden. I posed the same question to VP of original content Cindy Holland and chief product officer Neil Hunt, and received a similar answer. Until, or unless, viewers make choices that reflect more diversity there’s an internal question over whether Netflix should try to nudge them that way. While this bidding war is already over, I wonder if losing out on a desirable release could spur a change in policy, or at least rekindle the issue. If it can’t win in theatrical reach and money doesn’t matter, promising that it can market to an audience without imposing antiquated limits could make it an appealing option.

Source: Fox Searchlight, The Sundance Institute

1
Feb

Man found not guilty after confiscating his child’s iPhone


You can safely say that you have control over your kids’ devices when you’re living with them, but it’s trickier if you split up with your partner and share custody — and one former couple just learned this the hard way. A Dallas judge has found Ronald Jackson not guilty of a theft charge filed after he took his daughter’s iPhone 4S (bought by his ex-partner, Michelle Steppe) as punishment for a rude phone message and refused to give it back. There just wasn’t enough evidence to pursue the case, the judge said.

Suffice it to say that Steppe doesn’t agree with the ruling. While she accepts that Jackson had the authority to confiscate the phone while his daughter was visiting, she believes that power ended the moment his daughter left his custody. This wasn’t Jackson’s property to keep, Steppe argues, even if it did teach the child a lesson about etiquette. However you see the case, it’s clear that you’re kicking a hornet’s nest the moment you decide that policing your kid’s device use trumps questions of ownership.

Via: Washington Post

Source: CBS Dallas-Fort Worth, WFAA

1
Feb

It’s official: Galaxy S7 is launching on February 21


galaxy s7 unpacked 2016

Folks, it’s set in stone: the Galaxy S7 is launching on Sunday, February 21, 2016.

Samsung sent out invites to members of the press for its February 21 Unpacked 2016 event and there’s no doubt that we will get to see the Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 Edge. The event will start at 7PM Barcelona time, on the same day LG plans to take the veils off its G5, ahead of MWC 2016. Two top Android flagships in one day, and Android Authority will be there to cover them both in detail.

Full details on the Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 Edge specs, features and release – rumor roundup

While the invite itself is rather cryptic, Samsung put out a short teaser clip featuring its Gear VR headset. It’s possible that virtual reality will be incorporated somehow in the launch or that Samsung is preparing an announcement on this front.

No teasers yet about the Galaxy S7, but thanks to the rumor mill, we have a good idea of what to expect. Full details are available in our rumor roundup linked above, but at least in terms of design you should expect something very similar to the Galaxy S6, with an all-black version to spice it up.

As for the actual Galaxy S7 release date, March 11 is when the Galaxy S7 and Galaxy S7 Edge will be available in stores in the US and Europe, and presumably more markets from around the world. That’s according to reports by @evleaks and assuming that everything goes to plan.

There were rumors that Samsung would release the Galaxy S7 early –  indeed, last year the Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge hit the stores almost a month later than the rumored March 11 release of the S7.

There’s been some confusion regarding a third version, Galaxy S7 Plus, possibly launching at MWC, but our current understanding is that only the 5.1-inch Galaxy S7 and 5.5-inch Galaxy S7 Edge are coming on February 21.

MWC is cementing its status as the most important mobile event in the world, with four major devices set to debut in Barcelona. Besides the Galaxy S7 and LG G5, Huawei is rumored to introduce the P9, while Xiaomi’s Hugo Barra will be on stage on February 24 to show the world the brand new Mi 5.

Three weeks left to Galaxy S7 launch date! Who’s excited?

1
Feb

Apple’s latest earnings have good news for Google


Apple_Store_Carrousel_du_Louvre,_18_March_2011

Depending on where one looks, Apple either had the best quarter ever at the end of last year, or else has finally started to come down from its high horse of smartphone sales. While the company did manage to make more money than ever before – $18 billion dollars in profit is no small sum – when details emerged about iPhone sales in an earnings call with CEO Tim Cook earlier this week, the big take away was that – save for China – iOS phone sales declined in every market. In contrast – save for China – Android sales have surged.

Indeed reports have been coming down the line for some time now that iPad sales have begun to slow over the past years, and many felt Apple charged too prominent a premium for its iPad Pro, released last fall, which has a comparable cost to an standard MacBook or higher end mobile PC. The fact that the product’s stylus, the Apple Pencil, was not included with the purchase only further intensified this situation for some, as did the high price for the Pencil.

Despite the high profits however, there is seemingly a big blend of trouble brewing at Cupertino when it comes to money to be made going forward. This piece will consider the details surrounding Apple’s current situation, explain why Google’s strategy is proving to be more successful, and evaluate how the marketplace metrics might look come this time next year.

apple-store-line

People line up for iPhones, but will this trend continue for the foreseeable future?

Kaesler Media / Shutterstock.com

The spin is in

It should surprise no one that, despite data suggesting otherwise, Apple was more than willing to spin the situation the company is in. Mr. Tim Cook presented the case as follows: Hordes of Android users are switching over to iPhones, and that the company – when considering the total number of iPhone users prior to the release of the 6 and 6 Plus – has a major majority of potential customers who have not yet even upgraded to an iPhone 6/6 Plus or iPhone 6S/6S Plus. Specifically:

“We were blown away by the level of Android switchers that we had last quarter. It was the highest ever by far. And so we see that as a huge opportunity…The number of people who had an iPhone prior to the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus announcements — and so this was in September of 2014 that have not yet upgraded to a 6, 6 Plus or 6s or 6s Plus is now 60%. So, another way to think about that is 40% have, 60% have not.”

The problem is that, despite the spirited talk, data provided by Kantar Worldpanel ComTech indicates something far different is going on as far as Apple’s smartphone sales are concerned: Google’s undisputed dominance. In fact, the chief of research at Kantar, Carolina Milanesi, had the following to say:

Apple loyalty in the U.S. is at its highest since 2012, reinforcing the fact that customer retention is not an issue. However, customer acquisition from Android has gone from 13% in 4Q14 to 11% in 4Q15, and the contribution that first-time smartphone buyers make to Apple overall sales numbers went from 20% to 11% over that same period.

Thus despite Tim Cook boasting about impressive side shifting from Android to iOS, the numbers are actually declining. The following data from Kantar illustrates the point quite clearly:

kantar-december-2015-2

Curious how, save for China, all countries listed above saw iOS sales decrease. This goes a long way to illustrate the belief that Apple’s golden days of smartphone sales may be at an end. As Business Insider pointed out in a recent piece, there is additional evidence to support this claim via Raymond James research:

screen shot 2016-01-27 at 10.43.58

The above graph shows that Android has gradually reached new heights over the past few years, whereas Apple on the other hand, has never managed to regain the peak it once did in the Fall of 2013 when the iPhone 5S and iPhone 5C released.

There will inevitably be a number of Android users who make the switch to Apple’s ecosystem. Some of them, like Joshua Vergara, will switch back to Android, but most probably won’t. Does it make sense? Sure. Consider that before 2014, Apple didn’t have a larger screen iPhone, and thus there are untold numbers of customers who basically “caved” and went to Google’s mobile OS simply out of a desire to use a larger product.

For those who switched and were unhappy with Android, or else still found iOS to be more to their liking, it would have made perfect sense to revert back to Apple’s camp when the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus released. But then again, those who were on contracts may have just waited until the 6S and 6S Plus landed. Anyone who gave in at the launch of the iPhone 5S in 2013 would have thus reached the end of their contract when Q4 2015 dawned.

Even so, data from Raymond James suggests that even if Android users are “jumping ship” there isn’t enough to make a difference as the current trend shows increasing loyalty for Google’s OS while Apple paradoxically is experiencing a downshift:

screen shot 2016-01-27 at 10.44.09

It could very well be that, perhaps surprisingly, now that Apple’s big screen smartphone debut is behind it, customers are finally starting to get fed up with the limitations of the hardware and software. This could be the lack of widgets, the closed ecosystem, the high prices, the lack of “normal” NFC, the design or any number of other possibilities. In a sense, now that customers with “size envy” have gotten what they wanted, they suddenly find themselves realizing they are tired of the iPhone altogether.

The size factor itself

Another factor that may be contributing to the “end” of Apple’s smartphone sales stronghold is the size factor itself. In any given place, look around and chances are there will be someone – perhaps many people – who are still using an iPhone 5, iPhone 5S, or iPhone 5C. Chances are also high that, if asked, these users will indicate they have not chosen to upgrade because (1) their current phone still works, (2) their contract isn’t up, or (3) they don’t want a large screen iPhone, be if the 6 or the 6 Plus.

samsung galaxy s6 vs apple iphone 6 aa (5 of 29)

In an almost ironic twist of fate, by “going big” Apple has turned its back on countless iOS fans who once loved the company because it still made small smartphones. This mentality is largely behind the rumors that continue to surface about Apple launching a new 4-inch smartphone, now referred to as the iPhone 5SE. The idea is that the device will be essentially an iPhone 5S but with more modern internals.

While this could definitely go a long way to help Apple’s sales, the chances are less likely given that such a product will inevitably be sold at a lower price point than the 6S and 6S Plus. Meanwhile, there are countless Android products in any number of given sizes and form factors that accommodate the needs of those who feel “displaced” by Cupertino.

A victim of its own success

The final consideration of Apple’s iPhone sales may also ultimately stem from the fact that the iPhone Plus may have been “all that and a cup of coffee” and as such there was less of a burning desire to update last year. This goes even further when one considers the idea that 3D Touch is arguably nothing more than a desperate marketing gimmick. To put it one way, for all but the most adamant of supporters, Apple may have already “peaked” in terms of its mainstream users mindset; once people have their basic needs met, there is far less utility value in seeking to satisfy minor quibbles.

On the other hand, when looking at Android, manufactures like Samsung have – almost ironically so – made a case for upgrading simply from the use of metal and glass. The Galaxy S6 was the first Samsung phone of its kind, and that had people talking about it endlessly. To this day customers still debate the decision to remove microSD and a user-replaceable battery. How fitting then, that the Galaxy S7, which will launch in under a month, is rumored to include microSD support and possibly be waterproof to boot. Samsung has created its own way to keep consumers coming back on a bi-annual cycle.

apple 3d touch

Likewise, even Google is getting in on the game. Last year saw the Nexus 5X and Nexus 6P. This pair of products met two different types of consumer’s needs, as well as added major functionality in terms of the Nexus Imprint fingerprint sensor, granular permissions along with a number of other OS tweaks. This year has only just begun and already rumors are surfacing about the potential for HTC to make new Nexus devices.

The Android anomaly

Based on the data contained in this piece, it would indeed seem logical to say that Android OEMs are raking in the cash. Yet this is exactly what is not happening. Samsung, for example, had an unfavorable Q4 2015, as did LG. Unsurprisingly, poor smartphone sales factored into both equations. Even Xiaomi, which has been seen as an unstoppable juggernaut in China, failed to meet the lofty sales expectations it set for itself. So the question is, if Android is doing better than ever before, where is the money going?

Unfortunately with so many products and OEMS – The Wall Street Journal claimed there were over 1000 last year – it is difficult for any one to make an unprecedented , obscene profit compared with the situation just a few years ago. The average price is going down, the average specs are going up, and much like it was argued earlier, just like with Apple, many existing users may be satisfied with what they have now.

Midrange smartphones 2015-7

The real “money” may yet to be made though, as Apple has finally, essentially, admitted that pricing considerations are now being taken into account with respect to customer spending. In addressing the issue of Cupertinio’s anticipated 11% decline in revenue for Q1 2016, the company’s CFO, Luca Maestri, said:

“Inevitably over time, higher prices affect demand and so we’re capturing that in our guidance. So, I would say these are the major reasons and the drivers for the guidance on revenue.”

Tim Cook expanded on this sentiment, explaining that:

“I think you can tell from the numbers that Luca is talking about just on the currency side and that’s before thinking through the effect that price increases can sometimes have on the business over a period of time, it’s clear that the economic piece is large.”

Because Apple’s customers may have finally found satisfaction with the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus, because Android products are getting cheaper yet Apple products are either remaining the same or in many markets getting more expensive due to local pricing issues and exchange rates, it finally seems as if Apple’s golden days have peaked. If the company refuses to lower its obscenely high profit margins – the likes of which allow it to have 95% of the industry’s profits – it’s possible users will simply switch to Android when the time comes to upgrade.

The switch

Just looking at how mid-range devices have become mini powerhouses in their own regards last year, it would follow that they will only get more and more powerful. If the average consumer is faced with the prospect of getting another $700 iPhone, or getting a $200 Android device that has similar if not better – specs come next year, why would they stick with the iPhone?

The Apple brand? Sure. But if the company’s star is starting to fall, that brand may not hold nearly as much value come 2017. The ecosystem? Possibly, but many users don’t buy apps and thus can get the same free ones with Android. The design? Maybe, but then again products like the Galaxy A7 and countless offerings from Chinese OEMs all use premium parts yet cost less than an iPhone.

why i switched to iphone aa (14 of 18)

Wrap Up

Suffice to say, Apple is facing some very tough competition as 2016 gets started. The company is looking at a double-digit decrease in revenue predicted for Q1 2016. It admits that over 60% of its customer base has not updated to a new iPhone since the iPhone 5S/5C era. It admits that price is now factoring into customer’s buying considerations. It is facing diminished product loyalty and sales growth. All this while Android has seen an almost universal increase in sales growth and an increase in loyalty.

This almost certainly means that Apple with either aggressively try to compete with its rivals, or else continue to do its own thing and watch as its market share and brand value erodes once again while its chief competitor reaps the benefits. At the same time, rumors of the company developing a self-driving car and now even a VR headset seemingly make greater sense as the company tries to literally create – or perhaps just innovate – the next big profit center for its emerging empire.

samsung gear vr oculus connect aa (3 of 15)

Interestingly enough however, various companies have already jumped onto VR, everyone from Sony to HTC to Facebook to Samsung to even Google. And likewise self-driving cars are already well into planning stages by some companies. It is quite feasible that, unlike the iPhone and iPad where Apple “gave” the world the “new” product formats, its future business models will be based on the “me too” approach taken by the Apple Watch – which released months after Android Wear was introduced and especially after the original Galaxy Gear hit, and even the iPhone 6 Plus.

Of course, to Apple’s credit, with some of these products – namely the wearable segment and large screen tablet – much of the industry’s actions seem like trying to preempt Apple itself. The question will then become who can make the product(s) that sell the best. While several years ago it would arguably be Apple hands down, with new product genres it’s anyone’s guess given that Cupertino’s smartphones may have finally reached the pinnacle of their (sales) performance power. 2016 will be interesting, indeed.

1
Feb

Samsung Galaxy Unpacked 2016 is booked for February 21st



http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();

If there was any doubt that Samsung would be launching their next Galaxy S device at a Samsung Unpacked event, Samsung has put that doubt to rest by announcing its intentions to host Samsung Galaxy Unpacked 2016 on February 21st, 2016 in Barcelona. For those keeping track, that’s the day before MWC 2016 (Mobile World Congress) and is pretty much the traditional spot where the new Samsung Galaxy S smartphone is announced every year. Naturally, we’re expecting the Galaxy S7 to be announced, and while all we have to go on is rumours and hearsay, Samsung released a teaser trailer with today’s news that perhaps give us some very vague clues to what their emphasis will be this year:

Right from the beginning of the teaser, it’s clear that VR is going to take the centre stage. Whether this is the device’s own capabilities, or whether Samsung is planning to stream its announcement as a VR-enabled video remains to be seen, though we wouldn’t be surprised if both were true too. Given that Samsung has only just started to get its mobile business headed in the right direction again, you can bet that the Galaxy S7 is going to be a pretty impressive device – as if we expected anything else.


What do you think is in store at Samsung Galaxy Unpacked 2016? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

Source: Samsung

The post Samsung Galaxy Unpacked 2016 is booked for February 21st appeared first on AndroidSPIN.

1
Feb

HAVIT Bluetooth 4.1 wireless sport headphones: review


The days of wired headphones are limited with more options of Bluetooth headsets. I’ve been using the HAVIT Bluetooth 4.1 wireless sport headphones for the last two weeks and honestly had low expectations. They are currently priced at just $26.99 with free 2-day shipping at Amazon.com, and with my experience in headphones, you normally get what you pay for. But in rare cases, you sometimes get so much more than you were expecting, and that’s what I got with the HAVIT wireless sport headphones.

DSC00316

Design

At first inspection, the HAVIT wireless sport headphones don’t really look “sporty”. They are not brightly colored nor do they look small. You get two earpieces which are about the size of a two U.S. Nickles and are connected by a single cable with a rubber coating. The two earpieces are made from plastic, and the right earpiece is the one that contains the brains – the volume up/down buttons, on/off switch, charging port and Bluetooth connection button. The left earpiece is identical in design, it just doesn’t have any built in controls.

DSC00317

On the right earpiece you will also find the tiny holes that house the dual microphones that allow you to make wireless calls. There is absolutely nothing fascinating about the design, but they are actually very well built. The buttons are in logical places, seams match up quite nicely, and the charging port is accessible and out of the way from any potential sweat that may harm the headphones if you were to wear them while working out.

And although they look large, there are small protruding earpieces which fit directly into your ear canal. And those earpieces are actually rather light weight.

Usage

Honestly I wasn’t expecting much when it came to sound quality. But with my first listening attempt with Charlie Puth’s Marvin Gaye, I was instantly surprised at how great these Bluetooth headphones performed. In the YouTube video of Charlie Puth’s song, it opens up with a drum scene and my ears could instantly feel the drum roll. And then the music comes to life with a full range of bass, decent mids, and clear highs.

Bluetooth music suffers to its wired counterpart when it comes to sound quality, but the gap is getting much smaller as time progresses. What helps sound quality dramatically is the type of seal you get with the earpieces. The HAVIT wireless sport headphones block out almost all outside sound with the silicon tips it provides out of the box. They’re extremely comfortable and can be worn for hours. I know they can because I wore them on a two and a half hour flight last week. With the great seal and improvement in Bluetooth technology, the sound is actually really great and most importantly these headphones are fun to listen to.

DSC00309


http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();

I also was not expecting much in terms of call quality. The microphones are built into the right earpiece so you won’t have a mic hanging down in front of your face which is nice. In my recent experience with wireless headsets, I haven’t had much luck with superior call quality.

Until now. HAVIT uses Bluetooth 4.1 and CVC 6.0 noise cancellation technology which actually works well. While walking my dog and while hanging out with her at the dog park I took a few calls to give this tech a try. I asked my test subjects if I sounded loud and clear, and all four of them answered with a unanimous yes.

My only real complaint with these headphones is the volume doesn’t get as loud as I sometimes need. Gyms can be very loud at times with music blasting in the background, weights clanking, and with people talking. It can sometimes push my volume needs a little beyond what most people would listen to, and to a level that probably isn’t good for my ears. But when I work out I need to block out all outside sound. There were times when I could still hear outside noise which sometimes left me desiring more volume.

Other than that, the battery life is great at five to six hours of use, build quality is better than I expected, and the light-weight is a great factor when wearing these. They feel no heavier than my custom in ear monitors and are comfortable to use.

Specifications:

Bluetooth version: V4.1 + EDR
Operating Range: 10M
Talk time: about 6.5h
Charging length: about 2h
Music Duration: about 6h
Voice prompts: Support
Channel: two-channel stereo
Support Agreement: A2DP / HFP / HSP / AVRVP
Functions: answer / end / reject / redial, mute, volume control / switch songs, multi-point links, music, noise cancelling
Charger Port: Micro USB

Summary

For $26.99 the HAVIT Bluetooth 4.1 wireless sport headphones are an absolute steal. I definitely was not expecting much with the price I paid, but was happily surprised that the headphones offer exceptional sound with a high quality build. Materials were nothing to write home about, but everything else was worthy. If you are on a budget, or if you don’t want to waste money on a good set of headphones to use at the gym or on a run, I can highly recommend the HAVIT Bluetooth 4.1 wireless sport headphones. Especially when they are priced at just $26.99.

Check out the HAVIT Bluetooth 4.1 wireless sport headphones at Amazon.com.

 

http://ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&OneJS=1&Operation=GetAdHtml&MarketPlace=US&source=ss&ref=ss_til&ad_type=product_link&tracking_id=androidguysco-20&marketplace=amazon&region=US&placement=B00WR0WNGA&asins=B00WR0WNGA&linkId=QUV62IBJDTSY7MFI&show_border=true&link_opens_in_new_window=true

DSC00312

The post HAVIT Bluetooth 4.1 wireless sport headphones: review appeared first on AndroidGuys.

1
Feb

Facebook, Instagram make text art from your photos


Who knew that Facebook had a secret artistic side? Mathias Bynens did, at least. He recently noticed that Facebook and Instagram automatically turn many public photos into ASCII art just by adding a file extension to the end of the web link — “.html” if you want a color image, or “.txt” if you’d prefer it in black and white. I’ve tried the trick with a few of my photos (see above and below for examples), and it definitely works — the results have a great lo-fi vibe that could work well for a Facebook background image or even a poster.

As to why Facebook is doing this? It’s not clear yet. This could be for some as yet unknown app or service, or it could just be engineers having fun with code. We’ve reached out to the company, and we’ll let you know if it can solve this mystery. In the meantime, have fun. It’s a simple way to inject new life into photos that might otherwise gather virtual dust.

[Original image credits: the author, Instagram (top, bottom)]

Instagram flower shot turned into ASCII art

Via: The Next Web, The Verge

Source: Mathias Bynens (Twitter)

1
Feb

Comcast customer’s Raspberry Pi bot tweets when speeds are lousy


No one likes complaining to an internet service provider, but it’s especially frustrating when you’re not getting the performance you’re paying for. Many ISPs refuse to do anything unless your speeds are truly glacial, even if the slowdowns create serious problems. Well, Comcast customer AlekseyP has devised a clever way to make his voice heard: he created a Raspberry Pi-powered Twitter bot. The machine automatically tweets his speeds to Comcast whenever the downstream rate falls below 50Mbps, or a third of the 150Mbps he’s supposed to be getting. The approach saves him the trouble of calling out Comcast himself, and catches those speed drops even when the house is empty.

Aleksey admits that he hasn’t actually followed up with Comcast on his slow connection, since he believes that everyone should get their advertised speeds, not just the individual customers who raise their voices. That’s a bit counterintuitive when ISPs rarely do anything without a formal complaint in hand. Still, efforts like these could be worthwhile if they get internet giants to notice service quality problems that they’d otherwise ignore. If you’re willing to try it yourself, you can grab the source code to set up a Raspberry Pi watchdog for your own connection.

Via: The Next Web

Source: Reddit, AComcast User (Twitter), Pastebin